Immigrants from Guatemala vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Hmong
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,702,886 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Hmong.
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 23.3%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $91,296, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $56,339, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $35,498, a difference of 0.15%), median household income ($75,123 compared to $75,839, a difference of 0.95%), and per capita income ($37,550 compared to $38,120, a difference of 1.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,550 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $87,191 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,123 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,851 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,244 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,444 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,447 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,341 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,573 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,950 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Tragic 27.7% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 44.5%), receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and single female poverty (24.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Hmong |
Poverty | Tragic 15.5% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Tragic 12.0% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.6% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.9% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.1% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.3% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.2% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.1% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.6% | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 58.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Hmong |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.7% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.6% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.73%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Tragic 81.7% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 35.1%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.98%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Hmong |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.8% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.8% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.41 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.5% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.1%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.86%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 83.6%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and associate's degree (38.1% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.4% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.4% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 90.7% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.4% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 85.8% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.0% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.4% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.9% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.1% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Hmong |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.1% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |