Speaking abroad for the first time as president, Joe Biden on Wednesday elicited cheers for vowing to get tough on Russia’s Vladimir Putin. He told U.S. troops at a British airbase that he planned to “meet with Mr. Putin, to let him know what I want him to know.” The service members exploded into applause for what they hailed as a tough message to a menacing adversary.
Was Biden’s message really all that “tough?” After all, what he was calling for—a meeting to talk with the Russian leader—is practically the definition of diplomacy and dialogue, which Biden has advocated since April. In the same speech, Biden repeated his goal of a more “stable and predictable relationship” with Russia, which some commentators believe is an overly soft approach, especially after Putin’s recent crackdown on Alexei Navalny’s organization and the “state-sponsored hijacking” of a civilian aircraft by the pro-Kremlin regime in Belarus.
Yet the fact is, the cheering troops are right: Biden is being tough on Putin, but not just because he’s saying the right things. When it comes to the difficult, high-stakes U.S.-Russia relationship, toughness doesn’t mean refusing to talk to the other side, even when they’ve engaged in bad behavior. American presidents over the years have shown that successfully managing this relationship demands three different kinds of toughness: talking tough, toughing it out, and hanging tough. Though they can be easily overshadowed by the political theater of U.S.-Russia conflict, these three kinds of toughness are essential foundations for any communication between Washington and Moscow to bear fruit.
Read More »