Cambridge University Press
978-1-107-00388-0 - Buddhist Funeral Cultures of Southeast Asia and China
Edited by Paul Williams and Patrice Ladwig
Excerpt
More information
chapter 1
Introduction: Buddhist funeral cultures
Patrice Ladwig and Paul Williams
death at the centre of buddhist culture
The statement that ‘death is the origin and the center of culture’ (Assmann
2005: 1) might at first sight seem like a simple generalisation that misses out
on many other aspects of culture. However, when the study of death is not
simply reduced to a rite of passage, we believe that approaching Buddhist
cultures through their ideas, imaginaries and practices related to death can
help us to understand crucial facts that reach beyond the domain of death
and dying. First, death offers a unique departure for understanding the
relations between people, monks, ritual experts and other entities that are
commonly labelled as ‘the dead’, but can in fact comprise a multitude of
entities of various ontological statuses. Second, death reaches out into such
diverse domains as agricultural fertility, human reproduction, political cults
and the economy and therefore constitutes a total social fact (Mauss 1990).
Jan Assmann’s statement also has a particular relevance for the history of
Buddhism. Death indeed was and is at the centre of Buddhist culture and
has on a ritual, ideological and even economic level played a crucial role in
its development and spread. Death was from its beginning an event that was
seen as particularly central to Buddhist interests. Throughout Asia it has
always been recognised that Buddhists are specialists in death. One of the
things that attracted Chinese (and Tibetans, for that matter) to Buddhism
was its clarity about what happens at death, the processes needed to ensure a
successful death – the welfare of the dead person and his or her mourners –
and its clarity about what happens after death and its links with the whole
way someone has lived their life. No other rival religion in Asia had at that
time such clarity. It was a major factor in the successful transmission of
Buddhism from its original Indian cultural context.
Why was Buddhism so successful in explaining death? Death was written
into Buddhism from the beginning. It is universally accepted in the various
hagiographies of Siddhārtha Gautama (died c. 400 bce), the wealthy aristocrat
1
© in this web service Cambridge University Press
www.cambridge.org
Cambridge University Press
978-1-107-00388-0 - Buddhist Funeral Cultures of Southeast Asia and China
Edited by Paul Williams and Patrice Ladwig
Excerpt
More information
2
patrice ladwig and paul williams
who was to become the so-called ‘historical Buddha’, known as Śākyamuni,
that one of the things which first gave him the existential crisis that led to his
spiritual search was the sight of a dead man. This came as a shock, but much
more was the shock when he applied the lesson to himself. He too would one
day be as this man was – dead. The breakdown which resulted took from him
all taste for the pleasures of life. Aware that there were others in north India
who felt like he did, and who sought a state of being in which death would
have ceased to be a problem for them, he renounced his life of luxury (and his
wife and child) and joined them, a ‘drop-out’. After many years in the forest, a
homeless ascetic who lived on alms and practised physical austerities and
deep meditation, he came to understand that if he could see in the deepest,
most life-transforming way things the way they really are then death would no
longer be anything to him. Seeing things that way, Buddhists hold, made
Siddhārtha Gautama the Awakened One, the Buddha. This is a matter of
the mind, understanding reality as it is, not physical asceticism but mental
comprehension brought about through deep meditation. And that awakening
was accompanied, so Buddhist tradition holds, by a triumph over Māra, the
Buddhist ‘tempter’, whose very name suggests etymologically a personification
of death.
So the Buddhist path from the beginning lay in a confrontation with
death, at least for the spiritual virtuosi who could manage it. Doctrinally and
philosophically speaking, there is also an intimate link between the notion
of impermanence (Pali: anicca) and death. Things naturally arise and fall
in accordance with impersonal causal processes. We suffer, we suffer all
the time – including the unbearable but inevitable suffering of death –
because we try to fix the processes of change, and we crave changeable things
which in their cessation are bound to cause the one who craves them to
be miserable. Applied to our lives, we are naturally bound to die, just as
throughout life we were really inexorably dying all the time, from moment
to moment, or even split moment to split moment. Our craving for our own
permanence – something which is quite impossible – is one of the crucial
factors that entail our deep existential suffering and misery. We are bound
to die, and release comes when we let go in the deepest possible way and
cease at even a subliminal level from resisting our inevitable impermanence.
For, the Buddhist tradition argues, there is nothing about us unenlightened
and hence inevitably suffering folk that could ever stand firm against the
inexorable process of dissolution.
In this view, death is overcome through its deep acceptance, and its
acceptance involves seeing that it is constantly occurring, from moment to
moment to moment. Buddhist philosophy elaborated in great detail the
© in this web service Cambridge University Press
www.cambridge.org
Cambridge University Press
978-1-107-00388-0 - Buddhist Funeral Cultures of Southeast Asia and China
Edited by Paul Williams and Patrice Ladwig
Excerpt
More information
Introduction: Buddhist funeral cultures
3
different types of impermanence, and the complex causal connections
between impermanent events. Impermanence and death are of the very
essence of Buddhism. And it is this centrality of impermanence and death in
Buddhism, reflected in the Buddhist doctrinal emphasis on change and
absence of enduring identity – for death is a constant occurrence, we are
really in many ways dead even while we are alive – when expressed in living
cultures where close reciprocal relationships with the dead ancestors are
essential to social identity and cohesion, that we shall see reflected in the
studies contained in this book.
the dead between ‘doctrinal absence’ and
‘anthropological presence’
As many contributions in the present volume show, the dead continue to play a
role in the life of the living; not only in the form of memory, but as ‘active’
members of a family or a community. They can live on in the form of other
entities, as ancestors, spirits, ghosts. Therefore, what counts as dead, as being
and agency has to be explored in very specific contexts. As Holt (2007) puts it
for Sri Lankan Buddhism, the dead are ‘gone, but not departed’. As classical and
recent anthropological studies of death (Hertz 1960; Metcalf and Huntington
1991) have shown, in many societies death is usually conceived as a process of
transformation, and less as the end of the agency of a deceased person, as is very
often assumed in biological, ‘Western’-inspired understandings. And yet the
idea of ‘the dead’ as active members of the community, while undoubtedly very
much present in the cultures covered by this book, provides an obvious paradox
for anyone whose exposure to the study of Buddhism has been entirely or
primarily its doctrine. For from the beginning, we have been taught, Buddhism
holds that the dead have been reborn (or reincarnated – the attempt sometimes
made to suggest some sort of difference between the two in ‘Buddhist English’
has little to recommend it). Whether the dead are reborn immediately after
death, as is the doctrinal position of the Theravāda Buddhism of Southeast Asia,
or there exists a short period of up to forty-nine days before rebirth, as is
common in the Buddhism of e.g. Tibet or China, makes little difference. The
fact is that soon after death the dead have gone beyond recall, reborn perhaps as
happy beings known as ‘gods’ (deva), or as warlike ‘anti-gods’ forever jealous of
the gods, or perhaps once more as humans, or non-human creatures such as
animals, fish, cockroaches or wiggly worms, or hungry ghosts, or worst of all
reborn in one of the many terrible hells of Buddhism in accordance with the
moral quality of their past deeds while alive (‘karma’).
© in this web service Cambridge University Press
www.cambridge.org
Cambridge University Press
978-1-107-00388-0 - Buddhist Funeral Cultures of Southeast Asia and China
Edited by Paul Williams and Patrice Ladwig
Excerpt
More information
4
patrice ladwig and paul williams
Of course, it is perfectly possible that one’s dead family members have
been reborn close to their living descendants, and hence are still capable one
way or another of being in a dependence relationship with the living. But
once more the majority doctrinal position of Buddhism has been to deny
that these beings could be seen as actually still being our former family
members who have passed on and to whom we hence preserve our familial
duties of former times. This is because (we are told in so many introductory
books on Buddhism) the Buddha did not hold that the reborn being is
literally in all respects the same as the being who died. The reborn being is
certainly not in any meaningful sense the same person as the one who died,
and this point is recognised quite explicitly in several influential Buddhist
philosophical traditions (Williams 1998: Chs. 3, 5). A cockroach cannot be
the same person as one’s grandfather.
The link between the ‘reborn being’ and the ‘being that died’ is explained
in terms of causal dependence, where karmic causation is held to be a central
factor in holding the whole process together. And it is essential to Buddhist
doctrine that with causation there is absolutely no need for some sort of
permanent, unchanging, enduring self-identical bearer of personal identity –
a ‘Self’ – to link the one who dies and their rebirth (Collins 1982). All that
happens is that at death the psychophysical bundle, made up out of a stream
of physical events, sensations, conceptual activities, various other mental
events including crucially one’s intentions, and that awareness which is
necessary to any conscious experience (i.e. the five classes of psychophysical
events known as the ‘aggregates’) reconfigures. Doctrinally speaking, a
living being is nothing more than a temporarily structured configuration
of physical events, sensations, events of conceptualisation, various mental
events such as intentions, and awareness, without any enduring Self
(Pali: attā; Sanskrit: ātman) to glue him or her all together. Even when
alive these aggregates (Pali: khandha; Sanskrit: skandha) form a flow, a
stream, with no stability save that provided temporarily by the structuring
causal force of previous actions. At death one configuration breaks down
and another configuration takes place. Thus the person is reducible to a
temporary bundle of events where all constituent events are radically
impermanent, temporarily held together through causal relationships.
Thus even if one’s family members have been reborn in close relationship
to their grieving family, this doctrinal position would entail that the rebirth
cannot in any meaningful sense preserve enough identity to entail the
normal social relationships and duties incumbent upon close or even fairly
distant family members. The dead may be all around us, but they are no
longer our dead.
© in this web service Cambridge University Press
www.cambridge.org
Cambridge University Press
978-1-107-00388-0 - Buddhist Funeral Cultures of Southeast Asia and China
Edited by Paul Williams and Patrice Ladwig
Excerpt
More information
Introduction: Buddhist funeral cultures
5
And yet, as we shall see in the collection of papers published in this book,
anthropological work in cultures where Buddhism plays a major part shows
that the doctrinal scenario represented here must obviously be transformed
and reinterpreted where reciprocal relationships with the dead ancestors is an
essential part of living as a member of the group and its own social identity and
cohesion. These dead ancestors are frequently felt to be present and still to be
themselves for sometimes a considerable, if not indefinite, time after death,
certainly more than forty-nine days. They continue to be present, albeit as
transformed entities. Because Buddhism is in a society it necessarily performs
a social role, and that role (a role of all religions) is one of caring and coping for
the needs of society. As society also includes the dead, Buddhist funeral
cultures comprise a multitude of ritual and other activities focusing on
those who remain alive in some sense despite being considered dead. The
deceased have to be cared for, they have to be fed, to be appeased or simply to
be remembered as the duties to and relationships with the dead are essential to
the flourishing of many, perhaps all, societies.
imagining death and the ritual process
With the expression ‘Buddhist funeral cultures’ we do not strictly limit ourselves to the domain of ritual or text, or an original idea of death in early Indian
Buddhism. We understand the term in the sense of an imaginary, the latter
term here denoting not something false or fantastic, but – similar to Steven
Collins’ notion of the ‘Pali imaginaire’ (1998: 72ff.) – as a concept referring to a
capacity or faculty of the mind dealing with death and the dead. This imaginary
is also created and expressed in ritual and everyday practices. Farrer (2006) has
used the term ‘deathscapes’ in a very similar sense. On the one hand this can
refer to concrete spaces of death like cemeteries, crematoria, monuments or, in
general, material aspects of death (Sidaway and Maddrell 2010). On the other
hand, this can deal with the complex conglomerate of abstract discursive and
subjective spaces which death ‘inhabits’: texts, stories, emotions, but also rites
and social practices are just a few examples. These stand in constant dialogue
with the concrete spaces of death mentioned before. Due to these multiple
links of death to various fields and domains, it cannot be understood as a
timeless and universal idea or concept. Because ‘society is not only made up
of the living but also includes the dead’ (De Coppet 1981: 198), death reflects
the larger changes in society and history. Rituals, death imaginaries and
deathscapes are open to transformations caused, for example, by political
changes, sectarian divisions or religious purifications. In the chapters dealing
with death and spirits in Laos (Bouté and Ladwig: Chapters 5 and 6) and
© in this web service Cambridge University Press
www.cambridge.org
Cambridge University Press
978-1-107-00388-0 - Buddhist Funeral Cultures of Southeast Asia and China
Edited by Paul Williams and Patrice Ladwig
Excerpt
More information
6
patrice ladwig and paul williams
Heise on the Chinese ghost festival (Chapter 10) we see how socialist
revolutions have led to certain rationalisations or even ritual restructurings
that still have an influence in the present. Another example of the change of
funerals is how the civil war in Sri Lanka has also left its traces in the
preachings performed at funerals (Kent 2010). Robinne’s chapter on theatre
plays staged at a monk’s funeral in Burma (Chapter 8) show that these
performances are also commentaries on the present state of affairs. Besides
dramatising the emotions of loss and mourning, imposed government
propaganda (including the caricaturing of Westerners, for example) has
been integrated into these plays. However, also a subversive and subtle
critique of the Burmese junta can be aired in these performances.
What one encounters in the field, especially when dealing with local
Buddhist funeral experts, is the claim that the rites – as prescribed and
normative forms of behaviour – have changed little. Although Langer in her
contribution (Chapter 2) proposes for the Sri Lankan case that ‘death rituals
appear to be quite resilient to change’, closer inspection through a historical
perspective often reveals a different picture. As in Chirapravati’s contribution (Chapter 4), this might be expressed through a change in the role of
objects in funerals, but might also be visible through deeper ritual restructurings. However, taking our informants seriously in that matter also means
acknowledging that the imaginary of continuity, or the non-change of certain
elements of these rites, is crucial for them. In the sense of Langer’s quote
above, death is considered a serious issue that demands regulation and the
weight of a continuous tradition to be dealt with.
Death is a total social fact that cannot be cut out and analysed as a singlestanding social event; it is rather a starting point of a long transformative
process and an initiation into an afterlife (van Gennep 1960) of various
deathscapes. Many studies of the volume therefore focus on the collective
experience of death and how it is dealt with ritually. Death, as a disruption,
the occurring of a sudden absence and non-presence, poses a threat to the
social and cosmic order. Rites can be understood as instant and prophylactic
measures to handle this exceptional situation and regain order. This process
is most clearly expressed in Robert Hertz’s classical study on the collective
representations of death:
The brute fact of physical death is not enough to consummate death in people’s
minds: the image of the recently deceased is still part of the system of things of
this world, and looses itself from them only gradually by a series of internal
partings. [. . .] Thus, if a certain period is necessary to banish the deceased from
the land of the living, it is because society, disturbed by the shock, must gradually
regain its balance. (Hertz 1960: 81–2).
© in this web service Cambridge University Press
www.cambridge.org
Cambridge University Press
978-1-107-00388-0 - Buddhist Funeral Cultures of Southeast Asia and China
Edited by Paul Williams and Patrice Ladwig
Excerpt
More information
Introduction: Buddhist funeral cultures
7
This shock, or state of exception caused by death, is a confrontation that
calls for ritual explication, but also a ritual smoothing of the transition. As
Faure (1991: 184) has attested for Chan Buddhism, ritual is a form of
mediation that ‘simultaneously hides and reveals death: it marks its apotheosis, but also diffuses or defers its suddenness by turning the corpse or its
substitutes into signifiers’. Ritual in that sense structures the space and time
necessary for the movements and transformations of the corpse (Parkin
1992). This transformation of the corpse involves a number of stages such as
the preparation and laying out of the corpse, recitation of texts, procession,
and the final transformation of the corpse through incineration or burial.
This process is accompanied by a ‘care for the dead’ by the living by
providing food, merit, prayer and so forth. Obviously, there are large
variations to this pattern. Even in one culturally relatively homogenous
community differences caused through status distinctions can be huge:
a monk has a very different funeral from a well-off layperson, and again
this one is differentiated from the poor peasant. Langer’s contribution starts
with the (rhetorical) question ‘Is there such a thing as Theravāda Buddhist
funeral?’, to which Tam in his contribution on Southeastern Chinese
funeral rites (Chapter 11) gives us an indirect answer. For him, ‘in the end
defining a “standard” Chinese Buddhist death ritual is not a particularly
useful project’ (a similar point made for Tibet in Gouin 2010). It is not
about the search for an original, historical blueprint of these rites, nor about
defining a standard. So does the search for common patterns or a comparison between larger categories make sense at all?
comparisons, categories and differences
Large-scale comparisons are, since the theoretical decline of grand narratives
and the influence of deconstruction, a bit out of fashion. Recent research on
the basic categories of Buddhist studies such as ‘Theravāda’ or ‘Mahāyāna’
have been critically scrutinised (Skilling and Carbine 2011). However,
Williams argues that despite doctrinal diversity one can with appropriate
caution speak of Buddhism and Mahāyāna as categories. Buddhism in that
sense has ‘doctrinal diversity and (relative) moral unity’ (Williams 2009: 1).
Although we cannot offer in this volume a systematic comparison between
mainland Southeast Asian Theravāda Buddhist funeral cultures and
Chinese cases, we believe the outcome of such an endeavour depends on
the framework and scope of comparison. There is a whole spectrum
between deconstructing categories such as Theravāda through, for example,
the study of in-depth micro-histories, and the reflexive conceptualisation of
© in this web service Cambridge University Press
www.cambridge.org
Cambridge University Press
978-1-107-00388-0 - Buddhist Funeral Cultures of Southeast Asia and China
Edited by Paul Williams and Patrice Ladwig
Excerpt
More information
8
patrice ladwig and paul williams
categories that can serve as a basis for systematised and general comparisons.
Neither the contributions in the volume nor this introduction deliver a
systematic comparison, but we suggest that it is worth paying attention to
several potential fields of comparison. First, there is a certain historical and
regional affinity. Mainland Southeast Asia, especially the mountainous
border regions of Yunnan, Laos and Burma, are a meeting place of both
regions (Evans et al. 2000). Laos, for example, represents the eastern limit
of Theravāda’s expansion into Southeast Asia. In relation to funeral cultures, Gregory Kourilsky (2012) has, for example, suggested that certain
elements found in the Lao Ghost Festival have clear parallels in the Chinese
and Vietnamese festivals. Ladwig’s and Heise’s chapters deal with these
festivals in their respective contexts and can serve as comparative examples.
Here, the textual sources such as the story of Mulian in China and the
Theravāda Moggallāna point to common origins that are ritually interpreted in different ways. Kapstein (2007) has also looked at the transformations of this narrative in the Tibetan-Chinese context.
A second example for the potential of comparison in the domain of
funeral cultures can be advanced with regard to the importance of ancestor
cults. Bouté’s contribution on the Phunoy – a Tibeto-Burman minority
living in the borderlands of Laos and China – suggests that their ancestor
cult at least bears some resemblance to Chinese practices. The same can be
said for the descriptions of bad or ‘green’ death, which also contains a
comparative potential (see further below). We do not want to suggest that
mainland Southeast Asian Buddhism is simply a mixture of Chinese and
Indian influences, but that some partial connections exist and are worth
following up in future research. Peter van der Veer’s (2009) comparison
between India and China as civilisations can here serve as a model.
Another level of comparison inside the Theravāda tradition is advanced by
Langer. Looking at funerals and chants in Sri Lanka, Laos, Thailand and
Burma, her comparative examination looks for ‘core elements’ of these rites
and their variation. Langer gives us an overview of these elements: the presentation of a rag-robe (pamsukūla), the giving of merit, the asking for forgiveness and
religious wishes. She˙then discusses the ‘optional elements’ like Abhidhamma
chanting and the use of protective parittas. With reference to Lévi-Strauss’s idea
of bricolage, Langer understands the performed rites and the chanted texts as a
toolbox from which certain elements can be drawn. Although religious specialists might point to the coherence of chants and their genealogy from the Pali
canon, variation and individual appropriation is rather the norm than the
exception. Here, the canon (for the Theravāda case) and the chants used in
funeral rites, are less a fixed compendium of texts, but rather an ‘idea’ that is
© in this web service Cambridge University Press
www.cambridge.org
Cambridge University Press
978-1-107-00388-0 - Buddhist Funeral Cultures of Southeast Asia and China
Edited by Paul Williams and Patrice Ladwig
Excerpt
More information
Introduction: Buddhist funeral cultures
9
efficacious through its imagined homogeneity and continuity (Collins 1995).
Despite these variations, Langer – through a meticulous analysis of funeral
chants – succeeds in uncovering common patterns across a vast temporal and
spatial spectrum perhaps also based in the long tradition of regular exchanges
between Southeast Asian and Sri Lankan Buddhism. Langer concludes her
contribution with the statement, ‘On the whole, Theravāda monks from
Thailand would find little difficulty in joining into a chant of monks from Sri
Lanka.’
Comparison, however, is also based on markers of difference. In contrast
to the chapters dealing with Theravāda in mainland Southeast Asia, the two
contributions by Tam and Chen (Chapters 11 and 12) both refer to the
‘imperial metaphor’ (Feuchtwang 1991) that becomes visible, for example,
in the passport-like documents that the deceased need in order to cross the
boundary to the afterlife. This is completely absent in the instance of
Theravāda and the Chinese cases are marked by a different idea of orthopraxy. For Feuchtwang (2009: 103), China has ‘a civilization of the government of conduct, its correction, exemplary performance and enforcement’.
Although Ladwig has found similar ideas of the bureaucracy of hell in Laos
that could be related to the imperial metaphor, the difference between them
is still large. There is no bank of hell among Theravāda Buddhists and no
burning of spirit money or houses can be observed. The sacrificial economy
connecting the world of the living and the dead follows a different logic.
The latter point is also visible in the different roles of monks. Whereas in
China expert laypeople or half-official monks can also officiate at funerals
(see the xianghua heshang in Tam’s chapter), the Theravāda saṅgha seems to
have a much more clearly defined position in death rituals. Without them,
the contact to the dead is difficult whereas in China burning money or
paper replicas of offerings can be done without the intermediary role of
monks. On the whole, our volume has more contributions regarding mainland Southeast Asia, but the excellent volumes edited by Cuevas and Stone
(2007), and Watson and Rawski (1988) present more information on East
Asian funeral cultures. The material presented there can be contrasted and
compared with the Theravāda cases presented here.
the localisation of buddhist funeral cultures
The majority of contributions look at Buddhism as being very much ‘of a
place’, as all Buddhism really is and to which all study of Buddhism needs
constantly to return. In cultures where Buddhism has been predominant,
the relationship between Buddhist doctrine and social behaviour is a very
© in this web service Cambridge University Press
www.cambridge.org
Cambridge University Press
978-1-107-00388-0 - Buddhist Funeral Cultures of Southeast Asia and China
Edited by Paul Williams and Patrice Ladwig
Excerpt
More information
10
patrice ladwig and paul williams
complex one indeed (see, for example, Gombrich 1971). But it would be
quite wrong to approach Buddhism as it occurs ‘in a place’ (and when does
it not occur in a place?) with some sort of legislative model of what should
happen or what Buddhists must do. Given the large variety of what has been
called ‘Buddhisms’ (Ling 1993), we do not intend to reconstruct an original
death ritual and then look at the local variations that have evolved. Instead,
we want to examine the creative local appropriations that in a manner of
a bricolage make use of certain elements already apparent, for example,
in early Buddhism. The Mahāparinibbāna Sutta, recounting the last days,
death and the funeral of the Buddha (cf. Strong 2007), could in this light be
seen as a textual toolbox out of which certain elements are appropriated and
are then translated into ritual practices constituted by partially prescribed,
but also improvised actions accommodated to a local context.
Given the centrality of funeral rites in the development and spread of
Buddhism, many of the contributions give us a detailed image of the localisation of Buddhism in the field of funeral culture. The interaction with
pre-Buddhist ideas and cosmologies of the dead are, for example, exemplified
in the multiplicity of concepts of what constitutes a person and how this entity,
substance or conscience is transformed in the course of death. Conceptualising
this interaction of Buddhist concepts and their transformation on the local level
in a specific setting has a long history in anthropology and Buddhist studies.
Discussions on the interaction of ‘great and little tradition’ (Obeyesekere 1963),
the structural division of labour of Buddhism and spirit cults (Tambiah 1970),
or more generally speaking notions of syncretism, have all examined the
transformation of Buddhism on the local level. These discussions can also be
applied to Buddhist funeral cultures.
However, like the concept of comparison discussed above, most of these
discussions are currently somewhat out of fashion through the influence of
a flexible hybridism model of culture. Shaw and Stewart (1995: 7), for
example, propose that seeing a ritual or religion as syncretic ‘gets us practically nowhere, since all religions have composite origins and are continually
reconstructed through ongoing processes of synthesis and erasure’.
Historical studies of Buddhism have proposed a less radical, but still similar,
view. Buddhism was from its very beginning linked to a variety of local cults
and entities that have been subsumed under the category of spirits or
ancestors, as for example DeCaroli (2004) has shown. Through this flexible
approach to funeral culture we can understand that there were also specific
openings in Buddhist cosmology that allowed for an easy integration of
indigenous cults. Reynolds (1976: 207) suggests that ‘one of the reasons
Buddhist cosmography fitted so well into mainland Southeast Asian
© in this web service Cambridge University Press
www.cambridge.org