research
‘I consider myself sadistic’:
a qualitative analysis of
sadistic endorsement in a
ABSTRACT
Sadistic behaviour is not
group of Irish undergraduates
uncommon in offender
populations, especially in some
Jason Davies
groups of violent and sexual
CLINICAL LECTURER, CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY UNIT,
UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD
offenders. However, little
British Jnl Forensic Practice 2007.9:24-30.
research has been conducted
on sadism in a non-offender
Aisling O’Meara
group who are not part of a
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH,
MAYNOOTH, CO. KILDARE, IRELAND
sadomasochistic culture or club.
Twelve undergraduates, six of
whom considered themselves
sadistic and six who did not,
completed an open-ended
questionnaire exploring
individuals’ experiences and
views of themselves and others.
Questionnaire responses were
analysed using a thematic
analysis approach and
substantial differences were
found between the two groups.
Further research should be
conducted with general
population groups to further our
understanding of sadistic
behaviour and attitudes.
KEYWORDS
sadism; attitude; sexual
behaviour; personality;
thematic analysis
Introduction
There is a lack of good research on sadistic personality and sexual
sadism, both as diagnostic constructs and as clinical presentations. In
the diagnostic arena, sadistic personality disorder (SPD) in particular
has moved in and out of fashion, appearing in DSM-III-R (APA,
1987) as a personality disorder requiring further study, and
subsequently being removed from the manual in its fourth edition
(DSM-IV; APA, 1994). As a result, sadism is defined by many solely
by reference to a particular sexual behavioural expression (sexual
sadism), rather than by the motives or personality factors leading to
such behaviours (for example power, control).
Research conducted to date on the construct of sadistic personality
has taken place predominantly in populations of violent and or sexual
offenders (Darke, 1990; Gratzer & Bradford, 1995; Seto & Kuban,
1996), or with those who engage in sado-masochistic sexual practices
(for a review see Sandnabba et al, 2002). This has limited the research
population to individuals who have demonstrated their sadistic
interest through sexual behaviours, possibly in the context of the
commission of a crime as well as those who were otherwise
incarcerated. Additionally, researchers have tended to use a variety of
definitions of sadism as a basis of study, many of which are counter to
specific criteria outlined in either the DSM or other contemporary
researchers’ definitions, or both (Langevin, 1983; Dietz et al, 1986).
With such a restricted research population and ill-defined research
area, it is understandable that demographics indicate inconsistent and
ultimately low prevalence rates of sadism in forensic, clinical and
24
The British Journal of Forensic Practice • VOLUME 9 • ISSUE 1 • APRIL 2007
© Pavilion Journals (Brighton) Ltd
‘I consider myself sadistic’: a qualitative analysis of sadistic endorsement in a group of Irish undergraduates
general populations. Such contentious research
findings therefore necessitate clearer research on the
general population, not just the over-restricted
prison population.
For the purpose of this paper, a sadistic
individual is defined as:
British Jnl Forensic Practice 2007.9:24-30.
A person who humiliates others, shows a longstanding pattern of cruel or demeaning behaviour
to others or intentionally inflicts physical, sexual or
psychological pain or suffering on others in order to
assert power and dominance or for pleasure and
enjoyment.
This definition is designed to include a broad
range of behaviours and intentions, as well as a
number of their functions.
The prevalence of sexual sadism in the general
population is currently unknown, but Hunt
(1974), Crepault & Coutre (1980) and Anrdt et al
(1985) have suggested that 10% to 50% of people
have fantasies of hurting or humiliating others, and
2% to 5% report obtaining sexual gratification
from inflicting pain on others. O’Meara et al
(2004) found that approximately 6.9% of a sample
of 407 undergraduates from the UK and Ireland
considered themselves sadistic. However, there
appear to be individual differences in relation to
understanding and defining sadism which may
account for the increased prevalence in this sample.
The research
This research aims to explore behaviours, attitudes
and experiences associated with sadistic
endorsement in a student population.
Method
Twelve undergraduate students from a university in
Ireland agreed to take part in the qualitative study on
sadism. These individuals had previously taken part
in a larger study (O’Meara, 2004) relating to the
ongoing validation of a measure of sadism – the
Sadistic Attitudes and Behaviours Scale (SABS;
Davies & Hand, 2003; O’Meara et al, 2004),
designed to gauge endorsement levels of the
characteristics of sadism. Participants in the current
study were included on the basis of their response to
a single item in the larger scale psychometric study,
namely ‘I consider myself a sadistic person’, which
was rated on a four-point scale from strongly disagree
to strongly agree. An equal number of respondents
from the ‘strongly agree’ group (21.6 yrs, four male,
two female) and ‘strongly disagree’ group (21.8 yrs,
four male, two female) were included.
The study reported here consisted of an openended questionnaire designed by the researchers
specifically to investigate differences between the
two groups’ accounts of behavioural, attitudinal,
and developmental aspects of sadism. This
questionnaire included sections on bullying,
relationships and a series of hypothetical
scenarios, in which participants said how they
would respond to seeing or causing physical or
emotional anguish in someone close or unknown
to them. Responses were analysed using a standard
thematic analysis approach. This consisted of four
steps, namely reading through and noting
items/ideas of interest, sorting items into ‘protothemes’, re-examination of the data for material
relevant to the theme, and naming, defining and
supporting/illustrating the theme.
Results
Initial analysis of these questionnaires showed a
notable lack of consistency in participants’
understanding of what the term sadism actually
meant. Both groups often gave control, dominance,
disrespect for others’ feelings and obtaining
pleasure from infliction of pain on others as
descriptors of sadists. Despite the variety of
definitions, those who considered themselves
sadistic differed from those who did not in a
number of ways. These are summarised in Table 1,
overleaf, while a broad categorisation is provided in
Table 2, page 27.
First, those who considered themselves sadistic
tended to justify sadistic behaviour, suggesting that
it was a means of protecting oneself, a way of
making oneself feel better, or a fear response to the
prospect of being hurt. In contrast, those who did
not consider themselves sadistic suggested that
sadists were incapable of empathy, apathetic
towards others’ physical state or selfish individuals
for whom the infliction of pain was reinforcing.
Those endorsing the sadism statement who
reported having experienced being bullied or treated
sadistically by others attempted to rationalise these
25
The British Journal of Forensic Practice • VOLUME 9 • ISSUE 1 • APRIL 2007
© Pavilion Journals (Brighton) Ltd
British Jnl Forensic Practice 2007.9:24-30.
Summary of themes and ideas differentating those who consider themselves sadistic from those who do not
© Pavilion Journals (Brighton) Ltd
The British Journal of Forensic Practice • VOLUME 9 • ISSUE 1 • APRIL 2007
I consider myself sadistic
Strongly agree
Strongly disagree
Defining /explaining sadism
Justify sadistic behaviour
Sadists incapable of empathy, apathetic towards others’ physical state
Means of protecting oneself
Selfish individuals for whom the infliction of pain is reinforcing
A way of making oneself feel better
Fear response to the prospect of being hurt
Comments on bullying
Attempts to rationalise own experiences
Initially felt isolated and excluded
(eg due to being ‘foreign’ or ‘fat’)
Unperturbed by the experience at present
Anger and a desire for revenge for own maltreatment
Sadistic behaviour
No admission of committing sadistic acts
Playful biting and disrespecting a partner
Evaluations of their fathers
Short-tempered
Intelligent
Angry
Loving
Irritable
Disinclined to ‘show much weakness’
Opinionated
Descriptions of self
Reaction to others’ distress
Analytical
Optimistic
Irritable
Open
Uptight
Bubbly
Lack of morals
Sound
Neutrality or non-concern:
Greater propensity to help
‘I’d leave them alone’
More empathy for others’ distress:
‘try to help but not really give a s**t’
‘I’d feel upset’
‘I’d probably laugh’
‘I’d try to comfort them, almost feel their pain’
‘feel sorry for them’
‘I consider myself sadistic’: a qualitative analysis of sadistic endorsement in a group of Irish undergraduates
26
TABLE 1
‘I consider myself sadistic’: a qualitative analysis of sadistic endorsement in a group of Irish undergraduates
British Jnl Forensic Practice 2007.9:24-30.
TABLE 2
Broad categorisation of the differences between the strongly agree and strongly disagree groups
I consider myself sadistic
Strongly agree
Strongly disagree
Self descriptions
Negative
Positive
Attitude towards sadism
Defensive
Offensive
Evaluation of father
Negative
Positive
Helping behaviours
Weak
Strong
experiences, offering possible justifications (located
within themselves) for their treatment. They
included suggesting that they had been bullied
for being ‘foreign’ or ‘fat’. Anger and a desire for
revenge characterised these individuals’ reactions
to their maltreatment. In contrast, those not
endorsing the sadism statement, and who reported
having experienced bullying by others, stated that,
while initially they felt isolated and excluded, they
were now unperturbed by the experience.
Contrary to expectations, none of those who
considered themselves sadistic admitted to
committing acts that they would consider sadistic
(one participant in this group did offer an act of
masochism), while two of those who did not
consider themselves sadistic presented playful
biting and disrespecting a partner as sadistic acts
they had engaged in.
Generally, participants’ reports about familial
and romantic relations yielded no specific
features which distinguished the two groups
or which appeared to influence sadistic
presentations. However, one difference did
present itself in relation to how the respective
groups evaluated their fathers. Those who
considered themselves sadistic, and who described
their parents individually, described their fathers
as ‘short-tempered’, ‘angry’, ‘irritable’ and
‘opinionated’. In contrast, those who did not
endorse the sadism item described their fathers
as ‘intelligent’ and ‘loving’.
The members of each group largely used neutral
descriptions of themselves. However, those who did
not consider themselves to be sadistic tended to be
positive in describing their own attributes (for
example, ‘optimistic’, ‘open’, ‘bubbly’, ‘sound’),
while those who identified themselves as sadistic
used more negative language (such as ‘analytical’,
‘irritable’, ‘uptight’, ‘lack of morals’).
In response to the hypothetical scenarios of
others’ physical and mental suffering (What would
you do if you saw someone you know in pain?;
How would you feel if you saw a stranger upset?),
helping behaviours were pervasive in the entire
sample. However, levels of concern differed
between the two groups. Those who considered
themselves to be sadistic reacted with neutrality
or non-concern, as indicated by the statements
‘I’d leave them alone’ and ‘try to help but not
really give a s**t’, while those who did not
consider themselves to be sadistic indicated a
greater propensity to help and demonstrated more
empathy for others’ distress, for example, ‘I’d feel
upset’, ‘I’d try to comfort them, almost feel their
pain’, ‘feel sorry for them’. Despite these
differences, a number of individuals from both
groups claimed that they would ‘probably laugh’
if they saw someone being humiliated. One
participant who did consider themselves to be
sadistic who gave this response, emphasised,
however, that they did not enjoy seeing ‘real’
people in pain, bringing into question individuals’
understanding of sadism.
Discussion
This study represents the first qualitative
exploration of sadistic attitudes, behaviours and
development in a student population. Despite the
small numbers and the limited design and scope
of the study, it is possible to draw out a number
of observations and highlight a number of avenues
worthy of further research in this area.
Throughout the analysis of the responses, there
was a notable lack of consistency in participants’
understanding of sadism. This suggests that sadism
does not have a clear shared meaning to the general
population, and may mean that those who consider
27
The British Journal of Forensic Practice • VOLUME 9 • ISSUE 1 • APRIL 2007
© Pavilion Journals (Brighton) Ltd
British Jnl Forensic Practice 2007.9:24-30.
‘I consider myself sadistic’: a qualitative analysis of sadistic endorsement in a group of Irish undergraduates
themselves sadistic are a heterogeneous group,
at least in part as a result of the idiosyncratic
meanings linked to the term. However, the lack of
consistency may also reflect sadism as a multi-level
construct, as suggested by Baumeister (1997) and
Millon (1996). Thus, the findings here could
support the notion that sadism exists on a
continuum, starting with interest, then extending
through passive to active sadism.
Passive sadism may be defined as cruel or
demeaning behaviour of a playful or benign nature
where no real hurt is intended. This may explain
the ‘laugh response’ suggested by a range of the
participants to the humiliation of others, with the
caveat of ‘as long as no-one is really in pain’, as one
of the self-proclaimed ‘sadistic’ participants put it.
It might also account for the popularity of TV
programmes depicting ‘benign’ acts of humiliation
or suffering (such shows as Jackass TV, broadcast on
MTV, You’ve Been Framed broadcast on ITV or the
Japanese show Endurance), and may explain
disclosure of acts of biting described by some of
those in the ‘non-sadist’ group. Baumeister (1997)
makes the important point that the inhibiting
influence of guilt may prevent ‘passive sadists’ from
engaging in ‘active sadism’. However it may also
be that there are thresholds to overcome (akin to
the notion of ‘permission giving’ for offenders) in
any move from passive to active sadism. These
thresholds may carry with them social or
psychological costs which typically serve to inhibit
such a transition.
Active sadism, in contrast, constitutes willingly
abusing others, psychologically and physically, in
order to assert power or for pleasure. Although
those who considered themselves to be sadistic did
not disclose definitive acts of sadism, the use of
sadistic behaviour as a means to change mood was
evident. This study suggests some limited support
for Baumeister’s model, but this requires further
testing in a general population.
In the research reviewed by Sandnabber and
colleagues (2002), attachment to the father was
connected to physical abuse, alcohol consumption
and emotional closeness. The words the
participants in our study used to describe their
fathers could be seen to overlap with these
concepts, but it is unclear from the Sandnabber et
al (2002) research what implications this might
have in relation to sadism or its development. It
may be worth exploring further the descriptions of
their fathers by participants who considered
themselves sadistic.
In their self-descriptions, those who consider
themselves sadistic provide far less optimistic or
favourable comments than do those who do not
consider themselves sadistic. However, of the words
and phrases used, it is only reference to ‘lack of
morals’ that may reflect characteristics more widely
associated with sadism. In order to explore this
further, it may be useful for future research to use
techniques such as self-characterisation, a method
drawn from personal construct psychology, in order
to expand the level, quantity and quality of the
self-description gathered.
Finally, it is worth commenting on the views
of the two groups towards those who might have
bullied them, or why they might have been
recipients of bullying. Those who considered
themselves sadistic were more self-critical in
explaining why they might have been bullied,
internalising the ‘blame’. In addition, this group
commented on the anger they felt towards those
who had bullied them and expressed a desire for
revenge for their own maltreatment. Such
descriptions could be seen within a
powerless/powerful description of the motive for
sadism. In contrast, those who did not see
themselves as sadistic appeared to have managed
their experiences of being bullied and had ‘moved
on’ psychologically from the experience. What is
not clear, however, is whether the experiences of the
two groups were equivalent in nature and extent.
Knowing this would ensure that the difference
between the groups is derived from individual
differences rather than differences in the nature or
severity of the event(s).
Implications for forensic practice
The research described here has a number of
implications for forensic practice. First, the diverse
way in which individuals have understood sadism
suggests that, when working with offenders
considered (either by themselves or others) to be
sadistic, practitioners should seek a definition
including attitude and behaviours from the
individual, rather than making assumptions about
28
The British Journal of Forensic Practice • VOLUME 9 • ISSUE 1 • APRIL 2007
© Pavilion Journals (Brighton) Ltd
‘I consider myself sadistic’: a qualitative analysis of sadistic endorsement in a group of Irish undergraduates
British Jnl Forensic Practice 2007.9:24-30.
such things. Second, the lack of disclosure in relation
to sadistic behaviour among the group describing
themselves as sadistic might reflect denial or
reluctance to disclose such things. Although more
work needs to be done to test whether this is the
case, the lack of behaviours described here suggests
that non-disclosure may be common rather than
deviant. In the same vein, mention of behaviours
such as biting may not, in themselves, indicate
sadistic intent or attitude. Practitioners should again
not make assumptions based on such descriptions.
Finally, the rationale for engaging in sadism, the
justifications offered, the view of the self and the
wish for revenge all indicate the need for an
individual formulation approach to be taken in
understanding and working with individuals who
indicate sadistic interest or behaviour.
Conclusions and future research
We recognise that the research described here can be
considered only a very initial exploration of sadism in
a non-offender group who are not part of a specialist
sado-masochistic scene or group. Despite this
caution, the results suggest that sadistic interest and
behaviour are part of the normal spectrum of attitude
and behaviour and that differences can be identified
which could distinguish sadistic individuals from
those who do not view themselves as sadistic. Future
research could focus on:
• understanding the continuum model proposed
by Baumeister (1997), which has received some
support from the findings described here
• investigating individuals’ relationships with
significant others (especially father figures)
• self-characterisation to understand views of
the self
• experiences of abuse and/or bullying,
in order to build on the conclusions drawn here.
In addition, further development of techniques for
assessment of sadistic behaviour and attitude,
which have clear reference to the general
population, should be pursued.
Address for correspondence
Dr Jason Davies, Clinical Psychology Unit,
University of Sheffield, 302 Western Bank,
Sheffield, S10 2TP. Tel. (+44) (0)114 2226632.
Email: Jason.Davies@sheffield.ac.uk.
References
American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edition,
revised) Washington, DC: APA.
American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edition)
Washington, DC: APA.
Baumeister RF (1997) Evil; Inside Human Violence and
Cruelty. New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.
Darke JL (1990) Sexual aggression: achieving power
through humiliation. Handbook of Sexual Assault: Issues,
theories, and treatment of the offender. New York: Plenum.
Davies J & Hand N (2003) Sadistic interest: an
exploratory study. Presentation at Division of Forensic
Psychology Annual Conference, March 2003.
Dietz PE, Harry B & Hazelwood RR (1986) Detective
magazines: pornography for the sexual sadist? Journal of
Forensic Science 31 197–211.
Gratzer T & Bradford JMW (1995) Offender and
offence characteristics of sexual sadists: a comparative
study. Journal of Forensic Sciences 40 450–5.
Langevin R (1983) Sexual Strands: Understanding and
Treating Sexual Anomalies in Men. Hillside NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Millon T (1996) Disorders of Personality: DSM-IV and
Beyond (2nd edition). New York: John Wiley & Sons
Inc.
O’Meara A (2004) The prevalence, characteristics, and
development of sadism in a student population: setting
the framework for future research. Research
Dissertation. National University of Ireland, Maynooth.
O’Meara A, Davies J & Barnes-Holmes Y (2004) The
prevalence and characteristics of sadism in an Irish
student population. British Psychological Society,
Division of Forensic Psychology Annual Conference,
March 2004.
29
The British Journal of Forensic Practice • VOLUME 9 • ISSUE 1 • APRIL 2007
© Pavilion Journals (Brighton) Ltd
‘I consider myself sadistic’: a qualitative analysis of sadistic endorsement in a group of Irish undergraduates
Sandnabba NK, Santtila P, Alison L & Nordling N
(2002) Demographics, sexual behavior, family
background and abuse experiences of practitioners of
sadomasochistic sex: a review of recent research. Sexual
and Relationship Therapy 17 (1) 39–55.
Seto MC & Kuban (1996) Criterion-related validity
of a phallometric test for paraphilic rape and sadism.
Behaviour Research and Therapy 34 175–83.
Working with Risk
British Jnl Forensic Practice 2007.9:24-30.
Trainer’s Manual
and Practitioner’s Manual
New from Pavilion for Summer 2007
Identifying and managing risk and constructive risk-taking
require a sophisticated degree of collaborative working
and analysis of information. Primarily, this requires greater
connection to the perspectives and experiences of service
users and carers than presently happens within a narrow
and restrictive approach to risk assessment.
Working
with Risk
Steve Morgan
This new pack sets out a framework that places the
engagement of service users’ views and experiences
as the foundation for collaborative risk assessment
and management.The tools are developed as a flexible
system for prompting and capturing good practice
through a more expansive appreciation of risk in
everyone’s lives, as well as recognising the need to
counter-balance the negative view of risk, with an
appreciation of personal strengths and potentials.
The materials come in two parts:
The Trainer’s Manual
This sets out how good risk assessment,
risk management and risk-taking practice
should be followed for all users of health
and social care services.It is designed to
develop and extend personal reflection
on an individual’s knowledge and
experiences.
Topics covered include:
• wider context of risk
• working with service users
• working with suicide and self-harm.
This contains all the materials needed to run the two-day
workshop including full introduction and evaluation of the training.
Day one focuses on exploring ideas and issues related to risk while
day two focuses on putting risk into practice.
The manual is divided into eight sessions:
Session 1 – Exploring the wider context of risk
Session 2 – Working with service users
Session 3 – Working with suicide and self-harm
Session 4 – Positive risk-taking
Session 5 – Risk decision-making and communication
Session 6 – Assessing and managing risk 1: practice
Session 7 – Assessing and managing risk 2: case study
Session 8 – Taking risks: case study
£44.95
£195
Format: ringbound resource
Format: ringbound resource including OHP and handout masters.
ISBN: 978 1 84196 213 9
ISBN: 978 1 84196 212 2
The Practitioner’s Manual
Order online
or call
www.pavpub.com/trainingmaterials
and click on ‘Mental Health’
0870 890 1080
30
The British Journal of Forensic Practice • VOLUME 9 • ISSUE 1 • APRIL 2007
© Pavilion Journals (Brighton) Ltd
(credit and debit card orders only)
!"#$%&'"()*$!%#$+**,$("'*-$+./
British Jnl Forensic Practice 2007.9:24-30.
! "#$%&'%$( )#*+,-( "%,#$( .%/01,!( 23 2!( 4( .1,5607&0/1( 81/01*( #9( 81,1%65'( 81+%&0$:( &#( ;%<#=%,#5'0,=>( ?#$,0<16%&0#$,( 9#6
?+0$05%+()6%5&051!( !"#$%&'(!)$"#*+(00-(22@A2@B!(C?6#,,819D