If it was an action pertaining to the recovery of credit card debt and the state SOL was expired, the debt is no longer valid and cannot be collected. The creditor will have to drop all collection procedures (although sometimes they keep trying,which is illegal). If it was the for the correction of a credit report then either the time for dispute has expired or the time for the expunging of the debt from the cr was reached before the case was heard. One other factor is how the case was dismissed, w/o prejudice means the issue for the lawsuit is still valid and might still be subject to legal remedies. With prejudice means a lawsuit cannot be refiled unless evidence can be provided that a fraudlent or unknown act made it impossible for a fair hearing.
Yes, if the debt is not barred by the statute of limitations. In addition each state has different rules on the timeframe.
I would pay the collection account. Try not to let the account get that far that it becomes a charge off. It would be better to pay them all on time, of course. They both do damage to your credit. The charge off is normally paid less than the original charge. After paying, they both will show paid on your credit file if the companies filed them correctly. Make sure you have the company mail you a letter of Debt satifaction with a statement notifying the credit bureau. This is your responsibility to make sure it happens. Good luck..
if you know someone who owes income taxes and never paid you, and is receive disability can you take his disability?
A charge off is a term that refers to an amount of debt that is unlikely to be paid back. A charge off is then listed on a person's credit report and also on credit bureau reports. A charge off is a bad thing to have because it can make obtaining credit, either secured or unsecured, much more difficult.
generally 7 yrs. You may get it removed sooner if you try disputing it w/ the credit bureau.
No. "Dismissed" means exactly what it says.. the charge was dismissed!
I'm not totally sure, but I don't believe that there is one. Technically you are a free person and without charge. But, if/when the prosecutor once again has sufficient information to charge you, he may do so. Best thing - have your attorney petition the court to have the charge totally dismissed for "Want of Prosecutiron.'
dismissed charge
There is nothing to dismiss. You were charged with DUI and the appropriate penalty assessed. The charge does not necessarily go away unless you ask the court to erase it.
The statute of limitations on a case dismissed without prejudice should be the same as the statute of limitations for the charges. Being dismissed without prejudice just means either the plaintiff or the state has dropped the case for now, but still have the right to bring it back. For example, if they dismiss a murder case without prejudice, there's no statute of limitations. They can bring it back at any time. For personal injury, the length varies by state. It could be anywhere between 1-6 years where they could bring the case back. Check the charge number for your state. You could probably Google "statute of limitations (state) (charge)". Many states list their statutes online. Hope this helps
The Bureau of Engraving and Printing is in charge of printing money.
Dismissed WITH or WITHOUT prejudice? On a misdemeanor - IF it was dismissed WITH prejudice - you probably can.
no
WHAT notice are you referring to, and HOW was the charge dismissed? Insufficient information is given.If a charge has been dismissed by the court FWOP (For Want of Prosectuion), then it is dismissed upon the judge's ruling.However, the judge MAY have dismissed the charge either WITH prejudice or WITHOUT prejudice.With prejudice means that particular charge is gone forever.Without prjudice means the prosecution or plaintiff may approach the court at a later time and re-institute the charge or suit.
No. The charges were dismissed.
yes they do . i had background check and one charge i had came up that was dismissed.
He did not get convicted, as a juror on his trial was dismissed due to misconduct. This triggered a mistrial and the charge was dismissed.