www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2014, 07:10 PM
 
15,881 posts, read 14,529,165 times
Reputation: 12004

Advertisements

I think you need to loosen you tin foil hat. It cutting off circulation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NLVgal View Post
Not exactly true, BBMW. Patents for innovative products have been purchased and squashed. Batteries are big business, and big business does not like change. Why should they? They are making lots of $$ with the status quo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2014, 07:12 PM
 
15,881 posts, read 14,529,165 times
Reputation: 12004
A lot has changed like the whole raft of antitrust laws.

Quote:
Originally Posted by extremeatheist View Post
Take a look at what happened to Nikola Tesla. That business practice hasn't changed, it's only gotten worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 09:45 PM
EA
 
Location: Las Vegas
6,791 posts, read 7,131,941 times
Reputation: 7580
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBMW View Post
I think you need to loosen you tin foil hat. It cutting off circulation.

I think you should look into it. The us patent system is all messed up and rife with shelved patents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 09:54 PM
 
15,881 posts, read 14,529,165 times
Reputation: 12004
How far back are you going? Patents only last 17 years. They're also public record. It there was some hot battery design that someone came up with, patented and then canned. It would be there to be dug up. Once the patent expires, its fair game.

Also, the Chinese, who've gone big into solar development, and are deep in the red on it, wouldn't play that game. If they found battery designs that would let them leverage their solar development, they do it in a second, despite any US patents that might be in place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 10:23 PM
 
49 posts, read 101,326 times
Reputation: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoopLV View Post
That's all well and good.

But I'm sticking with the "be unusually efficient" approach. Our highest power bill over the past three years was $120. Most of our summer bills hover around $100 and the rest of the year it's always less than $40.

Point blank -- we spend roughly $700 per YEAR on electricity. Why on earth would we want to "invest" $30K to generate "free" electricity? Granted, we spent a few thousand to get our house this efficient. But much of it was sweat equity -- fabricating and installing solar screens, a pergola, roll down solar shades for the patio, and similar projects.
I too spend about $700/yr on electricity (or did anyway). I got a 5 kw system for $21k before rebates, $6.5k after rebates (most was from local energy provider). With those numbers my payback time is a bit less than 10 yrs, after that it's free energy. And for the whole 10 yrs before payback, virtually all my energy consumption is from "clean" energy.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 10:39 PM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,830,328 times
Reputation: 5478
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBMW View Post
How far back are you going? Patents only last 17 years. They're also public record. It there was some hot battery design that someone came up with, patented and then canned. It would be there to be dug up. Once the patent expires, its fair game.

Also, the Chinese, who've gone big into solar development, and are deep in the red on it, wouldn't play that game. If they found battery designs that would let them leverage their solar development, they do it in a second, despite any US patents that might be in place.
I agree and I have a few dozen. The system has recently gotten itself into a mess by screwing around with software patents...a huge error. But aside from that the system is pretty straight forward.

You can still have wars over a patent...and it is reasonably difficult to really establish a clean patent.

But suppression? Nah. Old Wife's Tale.

I would point out there actually has been a lot of progress on batteries. But there still is a long way to go.

The big need is for industrial strength and size batteries and we still are not there though there has been some significant progress recently. I also hold some hope for the use of nano structures to build ultra capacitors.

But no there is far too much value in a great battery for anyone to successfully suppress it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 10:39 PM
 
Location: california
7,325 posts, read 6,946,285 times
Reputation: 9262
I am primarily on a battery system , Most of my lighting is 6 or 12 volt DC.
I use solar, and wind, and city power, and generator, to supplement.
I bought my solar panels a little at a time as I could afford them, or as special deals came up.
The beauty of solar is that they don't all have to match to contribute.
Some panels do .5 amps some 2.0 amps some 3.o amps and some 10. amps. and a few in between.
Some panels are new some are at least 40 years old .
If you by a grid link system , when the power goes down yours does too. It's not allowed to stay on. some one could get hurt .
If you build your own system with batteries and no link, you may never notice the city power going down.
Or like me I have both but they are not interconnected.
No synchronous inverter involved.
My heavy appliances are on the city and the rest on my own system.
I have welders heavy grinders, and large air compressors .
I can't run them on generators, because motors take 3-4 times the rated running amperage to start up. No job is worth jeopardizing both tools.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2014, 01:45 AM
 
Location: Sunrise
10,864 posts, read 17,018,430 times
Reputation: 9086
Quote:
Originally Posted by jclimber99 View Post
I too spend about $700/yr on electricity (or did anyway). I got a 5 kw system for $21k before rebates, $6.5k after rebates (most was from local energy provider). With those numbers my payback time is a bit less than 10 yrs, after that it's free energy. And for the whole 10 yrs before payback, virtually all my energy consumption is from "clean" energy.

Cheers.
Where do you live? I know of no program(s) in Las Vegas that subsidize solar to the tune of $15K. If we had that sort of program here, I would very likely go for it. That is significantly more cost-effective than the last time I looked at solar a few years ago. ($25-35K to save $700 per year.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2014, 03:07 PM
 
49 posts, read 101,326 times
Reputation: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by jclimber99 View Post
I too spend about $700/yr on electricity (or did anyway). I got a 5 kw system for $21k before rebates, $6.5k after rebates (most was from local energy provider). With those numbers my payback time is a bit less than 10 yrs, after that it's free energy. And for the whole 10 yrs before payback, virtually all my energy consumption is from "clean" energy.

Cheers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoopLV View Post
Where do you live? I know of no program(s) in Las Vegas that subsidize solar to the tune of $15K. If we had that sort of program here, I would very likely go for it. That is significantly more cost-effective than the last time I looked at solar a few years ago. ($25-35K to save $700 per year.)
Austin, TX. $12K was rebate from local municipal utility company. $3K was federal rebate. At the time the utility rebate was $2.50/W (March 2012). Since then the rebate has dropped to $1.25/W, though install costs have also dropped (mine was originally $4.26/W).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2014, 12:31 AM
 
Location: Sunrise
10,864 posts, read 17,018,430 times
Reputation: 9086
We're still looking at $20-30K to save $700/year. Still not worth it. Maybe someday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top