Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Habitat Choices of Nubian Ibex (Capra Nubiana) Evaluated with A habitat Suitability Modeling and Isodar Analysis
In: Israel Journal of Ecology and EvolutionThe value of a habitat for a forager may be affected by habitat characteristics related to food availability, energetic costs of foraging, predation costs, and the foraging opportunities available in other habitats. Nubian ibex (Capra nubiana) are stout, sure-footed social wild goats that inhabit arid landscapes with steep terrain. We investigated their habitat selection behavior using indicators to (1) develop a habitat suitability index (HSI) model that would account for the variation in the activity densities of Nubian ibex across habitat types and seasons, (2) apply the isodar technique to look for density-dependent habitat selection behavior in Nubian ibex, and (3) investigate the proximate environmental factors that correlate to relative activity densities of Nubian ibex. We determined relative densities of the ibex by recording sightings of animals along standard walking transects. We incorporated the habitat variables that had greatest influence on the densities of Nubian ibex into habitat suitability index models for both spring and summer seasons.
The HSI models revealed that Nubian ibex most preferred open cliff face habitat offering safety during the spring season, but their habitat preference shifted towards an area with watered gardens ("grave area habitat") during the summer season. Significant isodars were only obtained for the summer season comparisons between grave area versus cliff face, and between grave area versus plateau habitats. The slopes of the isodars suggest that the grave area habitat is 10.5 and 7.6 times more productive than the plateau and the cliff face habitats, respectively. Our results suggest that the relative abundances and habitat preferences of Nubian ibex varied with the seasonal availability of habitat resources, extent of predation risks, and human nuisance disturbances across the landscape. We recommend that wildlife managers dealing with the conservation and protection of the endangered Nubian ibex should focus on the various ecological and anthropogenic factors governing the habitat selection and preferences.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Arenz, C. L., Leger, D. W. 1997. Artificial visual obstruction, anti-predator vigilance, and predator detection in the thirteen-lined squirrel (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus). Behaviour 134: 1101-1114.
-
Baharav, D., Rosenzweig, M. L. 1985. Optimal foraging in Dorcas gazelles. J. Arid Environ. 9: 167-171.
-
Berger, J. 1991 Pregnancy incentives, predation constraints and habitat shifts: experimental and field evidence for wild bighorn sheep. Anim. Behav. 41: 61-77.
-
Boyce, M., McDonald, L. 1999. Relating populations to habitats using resource selection function. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 268-272.
-
Brooks, D. M. 1993. Distribution, habitat association, and factors determining assemblage composition of mammals in the Paraguayan Chaco. MSc. thesis. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA. 35 pp.
-
Brown, J. S., Mitchell, W. A. 1989. Diet selection on depletable resources. Oikos 54: 33-43.
-
Brown, J. S., Alkon, P. U. 1990 Testing values of crested porcupine habitats by experimental food patches. Oecologia 83: 512-518.
-
Buckland, S. T. 1993. Distance sampling. In: Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Loake, J. L., eds. Estimating abundance of biological populations, South Wales. Wildl. Res. 25: 449-466.
-
China, V., Kotler, B. P., Shefer, N., Brown, J. S., Abramsky, Z. 2008. Density-dependent habitat selection and patch use in gerbils: consequences of safety in numbers? Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54: 373-388.
-
Cressman, R., Krivan, Y., Garay, J. 2004. Ideal free distributions, evolutionary games, and population dynamics in multiple-species environments. Amer. Natur. 164: 473-489.
-
Cattling, P. C., Burt, R. J., Forrester, R. I. 1998. Models of the distribution and abundance of ground-dwelling mammals in the eucalyptus forests of Southeastern New South Wales. Wildl. Res. 25: 449-466.
-
Cresswell, W. 1994. Flocking is an effective anti-predation strategy in Red Shanks Tringa tetanus. Anim. Behav. 47: 433-442.
-
Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species. Murray, London.
-
Death, R. G. 1995. Spatial patterns in benthic invertebrate community structure: products of habitat stability or are they habitat specific? Freshwater Biol. 3: 1365-2427.
-
Demment, M. W. 1983. Feeding ecology and the evolution of body of baboons. Afr. J. Ecol. 21: 219-233.
-
D�rgeloh, W. G. 2001. Habitat suitability model for roan antelope in the Nylsvlei Nature Reserve, South Africa. Afr. J. Ecol. 39: 313-316.
-
Druce, D. J. 2005. Species requirements, coexistence and habitat partitioning at the community level: rock hyrax and klipspringer. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
-
Emmons, L. H. 1984. Geographic variation in densities and diversities of non-flying mammals in Amazonia. Biotropica 16: 210-222.
-
Fabricius, C., Mentis, M. T. 1991. The use of habitat suitability models in game ranch management. In: Renecker, L. A., Hudson, R. J., eds. Wildlife production: conservation and sustainable development. AFES misc. pub. 91-6. University of Fairbanks, Alaska, USA,.
-
Fretwell, S. D. 1972. Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey.
-
Gibbs, J. P. 2000. Monitoring populations. In: Biotani, L., Fuller, T. K., eds. Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 213-252.
-
Gross, J. E., Alkon, P. U., Demment, M. W. 1995. Grouping patterns and spatial segregation by Nubian ibex. J. Arid Environ. 30: 423-439.
-
Gutzwiller, K. L., Anderson, S. H. 1986. Improving vertebrate-habitat regression models. In: Verner, J., Morrison, M. L., Ralph, C. J., eds. Wildlife 2000. Modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, pp. 161-164.
-
Hirzel, A. H. 2008. Using relative capacity to measure habitat suitability. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54: 459-471.
-
Hochman, V., Kotler, B. P. 2006a. Effects of food quality, diet preference and water on patch use by Nubian ibex. Oikos 112: 547-554.
-
Hochman, V., Kotler, B. P. 2006b. Patch use, apprehension, and vigilance behavior of Nubian ibex under perceived risk of predation. Behavioral Ecology 18: 368-374. doi:10.1093/be-heco/arl087.
-
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN). 2008. IUCN red list of threatened species in 2008. Available online at www.iucnredlist.org
-
Jakimchuk, R. D., Ferguson, S. H., Sopuck, L. G. 1987. Differential habitat use and sexual segregation in the central arctic caribou herd. Can. J. Zool. 65: 534-541.
-
Johnson, D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability of measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61: 65-71.
-
Jonzen, N. 2008. Habitat selection: implications for monitoring, management, and conservation. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54: 459-471.
-
Kohlmann, S. G., Muller, D. M., Alkon, P. U. 1996. Anti-predator constraints on lactating Nubian ibex. J. Mammal. 774: 1122-1131.
-
Kotler, B. P., Gross, J.E, Mitchell, W. A. 1994a. Applying patch use to assess aspects of foraging behavior in Nubian ibex. J. Wildl. Manage. 58 :299-307.
-
Kotler, P. B., Brown, J. S., Mitchell, W. A. 1994b. The role of predation in shaping the behavior, morphology, and community organization of desert rodents. Aust. J. Zool. 42: 449-466.
-
Krebs, J. R., Davies, N. B. 1997. Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
-
Lima, S. L., Dill, L. M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
-
Lima, S. L., Bednekoff, P. A. 1999. Temporal variation in danger drives anti-predator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis. Amer. Natur. 153: 649-659.
-
Main, M. B., Weckerly, F. W., Bleich, V. C. 1996. Sexual segregation in ungulates: new directions for research. J. Mammal. 77: 449-461.
-
Morris, D. W. 1988. Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure. Evol Ecol. 2: 253-269.
-
Morris, D. W. 1987. Tests of density-dependent habitat selection in a patchy environment. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 269-281.
-
Morris, D. W. 2003a. Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. Oecologia 136: 1-13.
-
Morris, D. W. 2003b. How can we apply theories of habitat selection to wildlife conservation and management? Wildl. Res. 30: 303-319.
-
Morris, D. W. 2004. Some crucial consequences of adaptive habitat selection by predators and prey: apparent mutualisms, competitive ghosts, habitat abandonment, and spatial structure. Isr. J. Zool. 50: 207-232.
-
Morris, D. W., Kingston, S. R. 2002. Predicting future threats to biodiversity from habitat selection by humans. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4: 787-810.
-
Morris, D. W., Mukherjee, S. 2007. Is density-dependent resource harvest a reliable habitat indicator for conservation and management? Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 53: 371-387.
-
Morris, D. W., Clark, R. G., Boyce, M. S. 2008. Habitat and habitat selection: theory, tests, and implications. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54: 287-294.
-
Morrison, M. L., Margot, B. G., Madonna, W. 1998. Wildlife habitat relationships: concepts and applications. Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison, USA.
-
Muller, D. M., Kohlmann, S. G., Alkon, P. U. 1995. Nubian ibex nursery: creche or natural trap. Isr. J. Zool. 41: 163-174.
-
Prins, H. H. T. 1996. Ecology and behavior of the African buffalo. Social inequality and decision making. 1st ed., Chapman and Hall, London.
-
Reid, C. 2004. Habitat suitability and behavior of springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis) at Augrabies National Park. Master thesis. University of Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
-
Rosenzweig, M. L. 1991. Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism. Amer. Natur. 137: S5-S28.
-
Schamberger, M. L., O'Neil, L. J. 1986. Concepts and constraints of habitat model testing. In: Verner, J., Morrison, M. L., Ralph, C. J., eds. Wildlife 2000: Modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, pp. 5-10.
-
Senft, R. L., Rittenhouse, L. R., Woodmansee, R. G. 1985. Factors influencing patterns of cattle grazing behavior on short grass steppe. J. Range Manage. 38: 82-87.
-
Stuart, C., Stuart, T. 2000. Field guide to the larger mammals of Africa. 2nd edition. Cape Town: South Africa.
-
Sukumar, R., Gadgil, M. 1988. Male-female differences in foraging on crops by Asian elephants. Anim. Behav. 36: 1233-1235.
-
Van Horne, B., Wiens, J. A. 1991. Forest bird habitat suitability index models and the development of general habitat models. Fish and Wildlife Research 8. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D. C., USA.
-
Verner, J., Morrison, M. L., Ralph, C. J. eds. 1986. Wildlife 2000. Modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
-
Vincent, J. P., Hewison, A. J. M., Angibault, J. M., Cargnelutti, B. 1995. Testing density estimators on a fallow deer population of known size. J. Wildl. Manage. 60: 18-28.
-
Young, T. P., Isbell, L. A. 1991. Sex differences in giraffe feeding ecology: energetic and social constraints. Ethology 87: 79-89.
-
Zeigenfuss, L. C., Singer, F. J., Gudorf, M. A. 2000. Test of a modified habitat suitability model for bighorn sheep. Restor. Ecol. 8: 38-46.
-
Ziv, Y. 1998. The effect of habitat heterogeneity on species diversity patterns: a community-level approach using an object-oriented landscape simulation model (SHALOM). Ecol. Model. 111: 135-170.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 308 | 88 | 3 |
| Full Text Views | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 17 | 2 | 0 |
Habitat Choices of Nubian Ibex (Capra Nubiana) Evaluated with A habitat Suitability Modeling and Isodar Analysis
In: Israel Journal of Ecology and EvolutionThe value of a habitat for a forager may be affected by habitat characteristics related to food availability, energetic costs of foraging, predation costs, and the foraging opportunities available in other habitats. Nubian ibex (Capra nubiana) are stout, sure-footed social wild goats that inhabit arid landscapes with steep terrain. We investigated their habitat selection behavior using indicators to (1) develop a habitat suitability index (HSI) model that would account for the variation in the activity densities of Nubian ibex across habitat types and seasons, (2) apply the isodar technique to look for density-dependent habitat selection behavior in Nubian ibex, and (3) investigate the proximate environmental factors that correlate to relative activity densities of Nubian ibex. We determined relative densities of the ibex by recording sightings of animals along standard walking transects. We incorporated the habitat variables that had greatest influence on the densities of Nubian ibex into habitat suitability index models for both spring and summer seasons.
The HSI models revealed that Nubian ibex most preferred open cliff face habitat offering safety during the spring season, but their habitat preference shifted towards an area with watered gardens ("grave area habitat") during the summer season. Significant isodars were only obtained for the summer season comparisons between grave area versus cliff face, and between grave area versus plateau habitats. The slopes of the isodars suggest that the grave area habitat is 10.5 and 7.6 times more productive than the plateau and the cliff face habitats, respectively. Our results suggest that the relative abundances and habitat preferences of Nubian ibex varied with the seasonal availability of habitat resources, extent of predation risks, and human nuisance disturbances across the landscape. We recommend that wildlife managers dealing with the conservation and protection of the endangered Nubian ibex should focus on the various ecological and anthropogenic factors governing the habitat selection and preferences.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 308 | 88 | 3 |
| Full Text Views | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 17 | 2 | 0 |