Christof21

You do not demonstrate that there is no blur at pixel level... Only at image level. Maybe this is true at pixel level but this no is not what you demonstrate. To demonstrate it, you have to proove ...

I think you make a confusion. You have extended dynamic range when you select DR400, not DR100. So in the second picture, you can see that it preserved highlights by underexposing. It brightens the ...

Pixel level performance is my concern when I shoot landscape for instance (where high resolution is appreciated) but dof is also my concern... So yes for me it is true to say that diffraction is ...

Diffraction at pixel level will be more visible with higher mp. Maybe you meant at image level (when looking the image at a given normalized size) ? If your logic is that these cameras have about ...

What you have read makes sense. With a Full Frame, you may use slower shutter speed than with other cameras if you want to maximize the dynamic range and still have enough dof. You can still use ...

You have problems not only understanding physics but also understanding english. The dpr article explains that the graph is not only about dof, that's why one of the member posted this graph. You ...

What is more important is that people wanting to get some relevant information in this forum are not misinformed by people like you.

Whatever you may say, you won't change the optic laws ! I confirm what DPR and other articles explain clearly, the equivalence is not only about dof, it is also about light (noise). We could add ...

Light also... Otherwise, ask DPR to change their article on equivalence and buy a small compact with a "fast" aperture.

Diffraction would be a non factor in real world usage ???? Stop reading if you want but please start learning.

100mm f4 is interesting in fact.... You are talking about dof, but the background blur is interesting. What matters is the ratio focal/aperture. So a 100mm f4 has the same amount of background blur ...

Yes Yes You have to consider both to know the final resolution... In fact, you evaluate the resolution of a system (lens+sensor) and ususally, this is what is done in the tests (dxomarks,...) But ...

6mp... You are right so here the sensor resolution is the limiting factor (see my other answer) and is inferior to the fz200.

The theory can answer precisely to your questions ! Your fz200 f2.8 is equivalent to f9.7, means that it is as if you were shooting with a f9.7 lens on aps-c. You multiply by the crop factor, the ...

I agree that there are compromises to make in photography. But there are good and bad compromises.... No OIS on a standard zoom is a bad compromise in my opinion

This is not because they say it that this is true.. I mean they want to sell their lens, now they have to justify their choice. Personnaly, I think they under--estimated the importance of ...

Hi, Do we read the same forum ? Most people in this forum say that OOC Jpeg are great. I am a raw shooter but I don:t have problems with people shooting Jpeg very numerous in this forum. No ...

More pixels does not mean more diffraction. At pixel level yes, but not when you normalize the size of the image. You can still shoot at f8, the result will be certainly as good as before but with ...

A7 in this case. X-T1 is overpriced. The A7 kit lens is really good (contrary to the A6000 one)., I think this is a really good investment for the future, this system is going to develop I guess ! ...

To have an idea of the efficiency , you can compare the low light dxo score, but you have to multiply by the square of the crop factor. If a m43 camera scores at 800 for low light, a comparable FF ...