x-men, origins:, wolverine, (2009), entertainment"/> Scott Mendelson: Huff Post Review -- X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009)
www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

 
Quantcast

Scott Mendelson

Scott Mendelson

Posted May 1, 2009 | 05:01 PM (EST)

Huff Post Review -- X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009)



2009
107 minutes
Rated PG-13

X-Men Origins: Wolverine is a film that has no particular reason for existing. It tells the background story behind a major character from the X-Men film franchise. But Wolverine was the lead character of said films, and we've already learned everything we need to know from the films in said franchise (like The Powerpuff Girls Movie, it is a feature length variation of an origin story that we already knew). And the extra information given here actually serves to make the character of Logan/Wolverine less interesting. It's not necessarily that a character like Wolverine is better when his past is left a mystery, so much of that past that is revealed here is so astoundingly conventional, uncompelling, and completely cliché. In a time when even bad comic book films like The Spirit have a certain 'are you kidding me?' nerve, Wolverine is shocking in its adherence to formula and lack of imagination.

A token amount of plot: Born with mutant powers that consisted of healing abilities, unnaturally slow aging, and the ability to pop boney claws out of his hands, the man who would be Wolverine finds himself at home on one war-torn killing field after another, along with his friend and apparent brother Victor Creed/Sabretooth (a slumming Liv Shreiber, who does so little with the role that they should have just rehired Tyler Mane). After they are captured and unsuccessfully executed during the Vietnam War, they are both recruited into a super secret black-ops program known as Weapon X. Led by the mysterious William Stryker (Danny Huston, as the man who would be Brian Cox in X2: X-Men United), this band of super powered assassins proves too much for Logan, and he quits after Creed murders innocent civilians in an operation. Six years later, Stryker tracks down Logan with the information that someone is apparently murdering members of his old team. But before you can say Commando, the insidious plot hits close to home, shattering Logan's world and putting him on a course to become the steel-clawed superhero we know and love.

The resulting film is every bit as predictable and dull as the information imparted above. The entire film is a muted, oddly lifeless affair. Without knowledge of the behind the scenes struggles between Fox and director Gavin Hood, I cannot say who is truly to blame. But the filmmakers seem to be under the impression that 'dark and moody' means visually gray and woodenly acted. Hugh Jackman does what he can with the character that he so obviously adores, but the bland, expository dialogue and routine storytelling leave him adrift. For all the blather about presenting a darker, more animalistic Wolverine, Logan is still the conflicted but generally morally sound do-gooder that he is in the X-Men pictures. Actually, within his element, he's actually far less menacing than he was in the first X-Men, where he theoretically posed a genuine threat to the children of Xavier's institute. He may occasionally kill his opponents, especially while at war, but he is friendly to kind-hearted older people and is no threat unless attacked first. In the end, the legendary Logan is rendered no more savage or dangerous than Jason Statham on a bad day.

That brings up another issue, which is the lack of memorable action set pieces. While the X-Men pictures were not legendary action-fests, they were rooted in quality storytelling and character-driven drama. Since those components are so lacking here, it would be up to the fights and chases to merit actually viewing this picture. But there are really only two even competent set-pieces. The first-act black-ops take down resembles a deleted scene from Spawn. The only action scenes of note are the climax and a mid-film chase involving a motorcycle against several hummers and helicopters. But, alas, every single gag in the mid-film chase has been revealed in the trailers.

The already short running time is padded with several fights between Wolverine and fan-favorite cameos. Did anyone really want to see Logan boxing Blob? As for Gambit, he barely appears and exists only to appease the few and vocal. His fight scene with Logan is especially amusing, as it causes tons of property damage without comment, and because it quickly becomes a classic 'neither of us want to lose, but the fans want to see us fight' smack down, resulting in no real outcome and no story advancement (see The Forbidden Kingdom for another example).

So the action is more or less dull, the writing feels like a bad television pilot, and the acting is barely perfunctory. To make matters worse, a few would-be plot twists seem specifically designed to aggravate the very hardcore fans that would theoretically flock to this picture. The climax, for reasons that I won't reveal, will absolutely infuriate devotees of a specific fan-favorite character (for comparison, imagine if, at the end of Spider-Man 3, Eddie Brock turned into The Vulture). A couple future X-Men make brief appearances, but their roles in the narrative ends up contradicting explicit X-Men continuity. The cameo that is revealed in the previews is especially odd, as Scott Summers finally gets a moment to shine, in a Wolverine spin-off of all things. This is of course ironic since Cyclops constantly had his story lines muted or stolen in the X-Men pictures by filmmakers who wanted to emphasize Wolverine at all costs.

Between Deadpool, Sabretooth, Gambit, Agent Zero, and Kestrel, 20th Century Fox could have started a whole new Weapon X franchise. Alas, none of these characters are even remotely developed. Dominic Monaghan has a moment of bitterness and regret as a light-controlling mutant named 'Bolt', but he's brushed off screen right before he gets interesting. None of the other c-level X-universe characters make any such impact, and nonfans will struggle to remember their names as the credits role. Ironically, this is as much of a franchise killer as Stephen Summers's Van Helsing (which also starred Hugh Jackman), which wrecked the film making potential of the entire Universal monsters library for several years afterward.

It's been awhile since such a major tent pole picture that felt so lifeless and ordinary. The plot and story are Mad Libs by the book. The writing is shockingly lazy with even the simplest details (certain supporting characters are rarely if ever referred to by their names, leaving the audience wondering who they are), and the action scenes vary between dreadfully dull, completely pointless, and utterly ridiculous. This film is the kind of bland and boring assembly line product that makes me appreciate the ambitious comic book films that I didn't care for (Spider-Man 3, Superman Returns, The Spirit, etc) and it makes me a little less hostile toward the lousy comic book adventures that at least had a junky spark (think Ghost Rider or Judge Dredd). Tragically for all involved, X-Men Origins: Wolverine is the worst major comic book adaptation since Catwoman.

Grade: D

 
 
Comments
22
Pending Comments
0
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Carl Lewis See Profile I'm a Fan of Carl Lewis permalink
photo

I would be curious to know what Mr. Mendelson would label a good comic book movie, if he feels any are good at all. Saw the film last night and loved it and loved it for three reasons. First, It was better than the previous 3 movies in the franchise, granted not a high bar, but the Disney-esque camp that saturated the first 3 films making them all as unconsumeable as a stack of blueberry pancakes covered in maple syrup, was replaced by a mid-grade level of grit and realism, and on that fact alone it should be at least C. The Second reason is that Liv Schreiber was Sabertooth and they never called him sabertooth once in the movie. It should also be noted that creed didn't become Sabertooth until he got his adamantium skeleton. It was appreciated to see victor creed being portrayed as an intelligent character instead of a grunting meat head. Third it told the story period. It's clear you didn't read the paternal works. Thing is when they first started this comic book movie thing they tried moving out of the box the original work had built for the characters and they sucked. The Movie was true to the comic, it was entertaining, and aside from the ending the excessive creative license taken with regards to Deadpool was a solid bit of story telling, short, sweet and full of dangling plot devices. I say Win sir.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 05/07/2009
- New Scott Mendelson - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Scott Mendelson permalink

Fair enough...

Superman: The Movie, Batman, Dick Tracy, The Flash (TV pilot), Batman Returns, Batman: Mask Of The Phantasm, The Phantom, Men In Black, Blade, X-Men, Batman Beyond: Return Of The Joker, Blade 2, Spider-Man, X2: X-Men United, Batman Begins, Fantastic Four (director's cut), The Dark Knight.

Nobile failures (at least they were trying) - Hulk, Spider-Man 2, Superman Returns, Watchmen

Flawed but interesting - Superman II, Batman Forever, X-Men: The Last Stand, Fantastic Four 2 (a great, character-driven opening 25 minutes), Spider-Man 3

Not really comic book films, but still among the best of the genre- The Mask Of Zorro, Unbreakable, The Incredibles

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 05/07/2009
- skateboy30 See Profile I'm a Fan of skateboy30 permalink

My only problem w/ Wolverine is it would have probably been a much better film had it been rated R. R is much more appropriate to the story and this version had little to no blood for 2 guys running around for 100 years killing people with claws.

Granted studio execs (include Jackman in this group) want PG-13 summer releases to guarantee box office.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 05/05/2009
- skateboy30 See Profile I'm a Fan of skateboy30 permalink

Wolverine was far more entertaining than the negative reviews make it out to be.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 05/05/2009
- ahmedhasanovic See Profile I'm a Fan of ahmedhasanovic permalink

Wow......... really!!! I went to see this movie thinking it would be a total failure, after one of my friends had told me that it was not worth the eight dollars. However after watching the whole movie including after the credits, I was farily suprised. The only thing that would have made the movie better is if wolverines adamantium claws didn't look so weird, and that wade wilson(ryan reynolds character) had been in themovie longer. Other then that this movie was pretty good I enjoy'd it very much.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 05/04/2009
- Bobrobert See Profile I'm a Fan of Bobrobert permalink

roflmao

Are you kidding or are you just a silly adult with no common sense???

The movie is a major money maker... no one cares if you want to prove you just don't get it by your poor opinion and lame argument.

Get a large pop corn and a large coke ... see it again and try to enjoy it.

Silly silly girl.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 PM on 05/03/2009
- MikeDu See Profile I'm a Fan of MikeDu permalink
photo

Yeh, history shows 'a major money maker' ALWAYS means its a quality picture (snicker).
Cartoon franchises, overblown CGI, and big up-front press does not necessarily make a watchable picture. See Fantastic 4 or Spiderman 3 or the earlier Batman franchise as examples.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 PM on 05/03/2009
- rjmiller See Profile I'm a Fan of rjmiller permalink

Indeed, we should all be thankful that the acting was at least better than Fantastic 4.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 AM on 05/04/2009
- liberalgirl31 See Profile I'm a Fan of liberalgirl31 permalink

Star Trek has been getting good buzz from the critics, so it may be the rare prequel that works. But I thought Wolverine Origins was an unnecessary movie, just like the Star War prequels.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 05/02/2009
- ramblingjohnny See Profile I'm a Fan of ramblingjohnny permalink
photo

One could argue that the Star Trek movie is a reimagining just like BSG and Batman Begin thus preserving the "Prequel suck!" rule!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 AM on 05/03/2009
- BustMyChops See Profile I'm a Fan of BustMyChops permalink

I'm not a big X-Men fan but the graphic novel "Wolverine Origins" was actually a very good read. Wolverine was just a kid / teenager though(so Hugh Jackman wouldn't be right). It was very dark and had a terribly sad(but good) ending. It's obvious from the previews that this movie has nothing to do with the comic from which it takes it's name. It's a pity. That would have been a ballsy hardcore movie. Thanks for the review....I will not be seeing this piece of junk.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 AM on 05/02/2009
- BustMyChops See Profile I'm a Fan of BustMyChops permalink

ORIGIN by Bill Jemas, Joe Quesada and Paul Jenkins.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 PM on 05/02/2009
- ramblingjohnny See Profile I'm a Fan of ramblingjohnny permalink
photo

The "prequel idea" need to be put out of it misery it did not work for star wars and it sure as hell going to damage the X-Men franchise. What marvel need to do is mothball the franchise for a few years than retool and reboot with a director that have at least some talent because after two strong movies it their second failure in a row and am sorry to say but this is Batman Forever bad!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 AM on 05/02/2009
- liberalgirl31 See Profile I'm a Fan of liberalgirl31 permalink

Well, at least you get to see Hugh Jackman naked in this!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 PM on 05/01/2009
- William Bradley - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of William Bradley permalink

The movie lacks the intellectual depth and soul frequently found in the X-Men series, but it's a pretty good action flick. I was entertained. But it's going to fall far short measured against Star Trek and Terminator in the cultural significance sweepstakes.

A couple of points ...

You might tell your readers that the movie isn't actually over when the credits roll. There's not one but two sneak endings after the credits start rolling.

I think you're off on your X-Men mythology. The special ops team Logan and his brother were in wasn't Weapon X, it was Team X.

Team X predated Weapon X, which was a supersoldier program in which people were forced against their will to undergo extreme modifications.

And in this movie, Weapon X, i.e., Wolverine, was the 10th subject in that program or some studio-ized version thereof.

What I found worst about the movie is that the big surprise twist is totally unbelievable.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 PM on 05/01/2009
- LLNYRN See Profile I'm a Fan of LLNYRN permalink

Other than having one of the WORST movie-going experiences in my life (all I'll say that is that it involved TONS of kids who came to the film as a school-trip), the film was dissapointing.
A very engaging first half (excellent credit sequence)basically shot down by a horrid second act. There's no denying Jackman's persona. You can't help but love this guy. But the dude definitely deserved a better written script and better direction. This genre clearly was not Gavin Hood's forte.
Glad I paid just $6 admission.
Now let's get on to "STAR TREK"!!!
Got my IMAX ticket for the first show on May 7th.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 05/01/2009
- RueKraehe See Profile I'm a Fan of RueKraehe permalink

Differs for you from the other three x-men movies, which lacked substantial or interesting plot development, and left much to be desired in the way of development of other female x-men characters, such as Lady Death Strike, or Psylocke. The other three movies also diverged from original x-men plot and character development, and although I would have liked more from all four of these movies they were extremely interesting and entertaining to watch. I also would disagree about the action sequences. Perhaps I don"t watch enough action movies, but I feel that the fights were entertaining. I did want to see Gambit fighting Wolverine, and it also was incredibly entertaining as an x-men comic fan to watch Wolverine box the Blob. Although I agree that the acting and dialogue was bad at most times, and the character development was also lacking, it was an entertaining movie, perhaps deserving of a higher rating than D. After all, after the last three x-men movies what did you expect?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 05/01/2009
- kps888 See Profile I'm a Fan of kps888 permalink

Everything you described just means that the fanboys will love this.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 05/01/2009
- Q2 See Profile I'm a Fan of Q2 permalink

Did you watch the same movie I watched?? First of all, as a minor point, Weapon X, as mentioned in the film, means Weapon 10 - that's Wolverine. Not the black ops team. Weapon 11 is Deadpool.

Anyways I had a lot of fun watching this movie, the effects were great, it tied in really well with the other X-Men movies, and it was just non-stop action movie fun. Take a deep breath, relax, and enjoy yourself.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 AM on 05/01/2009
- Scott Mendelson - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Scott Mendelson permalink

You're right. I was thinking that the program was also called that, re the comic book title that is called Weapon X that I assumed was the name of the group. Thanks for the clarification. I'm glad you enjoyed it more than I.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 05/01/2009
- Gary Rogers See Profile I'm a Fan of Gary Rogers permalink
photo

Two simple words.....

I Agree

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 AM on 05/01/2009
- artimus711 See Profile I'm a Fan of artimus711 permalink

me too....just saw it.....huge disappointment.....movie sucked......

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 PM on 05/01/2009

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or