What
You're Missing in our subscriber-only CounterPunch newsletter
HOW HADITHA HAPPENED; WHY IT WILL
HAPPEN AGAIN
"You
live like an animal. You learn to like killing. .. Hate civilians.
Can't trust the bastards. You hate taking prisoners. You'd rather
kill them. Why?" Read Vietnam vet Marc Levy's extraordinary
Primer on the Whys and Wherefores of PTSD and understand what
is happening in Iraq. PLUS
Andrew Lack on the incredible frauds of the bottled water industry.
Why you should drink tapwater out of a glass and save your money
PLUS Jeffrey
St Clair on the deadly secrets of America's oldest bomb factory
PLUS Chris Reed on Eros
and Militarization: how Japan's sexpot schoolgirls fit into the
right's Re-Arm agenda. CounterPunch Online is read by millions of viewers
each month! But remember, we are funded solely by the
subscribers to the print edition of CounterPunch. Please support this website by buying a subscription
to our newsletter, which contains fresh material you won't find
anywhere else, or by making a donation for the online edition. Remember contributions
are tax-deductible.Click
here to make a donation. If you find our site useful please:Subscribe
Now!
Nearly
Half of Mexico Lives Under the Poverty Line
Mexico:
Their Brand is Crisis
By MARK WEISBROT
A brilliant documentary by Rachel Boynton,
released this year, chronicles the adventures of one of America's
most influential public relations firms as it applies the most
advanced polling, advertising, and focus group techniques to
the 2002 presidential elections in Bolivia. The company, Greenberg
Quinlan Rosner, has the daunting task of winning the election
for Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada, a former president who speaks
Spanish with an American accent and is not well-liked.
The firm decides that the only way "Goni," as he is
called, can succeed is to convince the voters that if his opponent
wins, the country will suffer a devastating economic meltdown.
"Our brand," explains an operative of the firm, "is
crisis" -- hence the title of the film.
This has become the default strategy for incumbent political
parties in Latin America, as one government after another faces
opponents from the left. Next up is Mexico, where the ruling
National Action Party (PAN) faces a strong challenge from former
Mexico City major Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the Democratic
Revolutionary Party (PRD) on July 2. Lopez Obrador is a popular
-- some would say populist -- left-of-center leader whose main
campaign slogan is "for the good of everyone, the poor first."
It's pretty clear that Mexico needs to reconsider its economic
policies.
Over the 25 years since 1980,
income per person in Mexico has grown by just 17 percent. To
see how bad this is, one need only look at the 20 years from
1960-1980, when the country's per capita income grew by 99 percent.
If the Mexican economy had simply continued to grow at its pre-1980
rate, average income in Mexico would be at the level of Spain
today. There would be far fewer Mexicans looking to emigrate
illegally to the United States.
Mexico's pre-1980 growth was good but nothing spectacular for
a developing country -- South Korea grew more than twice as fast
and Taiwan at nearly three times Mexico's rate over the same
period. So the country's past growth performance is a reasonable
benchmark by which to compare the unprecedented growth failure
of the last quarter-century. Many have hailed Mexico's post NAFTA
growth as a success, but even this was only about a third of
its pre-1980 performance.
However, most people do not understand what economic growth is
or why it is so important. For comparison, imagine a discussion
about baseball where hardly anyone understood batting averages,
and those who understood them did not distinguish between good
and bad averages, labeling a .175 average "outstanding."
As a result, the focus of criticism is on Mexico's poverty, which
is mainly a result of the growth failure. In 2004, nearly half
the country lived below the official poverty line of about $4.00
per day.
Will a left government cause an economic crisis in Mexico?
It is worth recalling that
the same was said about President Lula da Silva when he ran for
office on behalf of the leftist Workers' Party in Brazil four
years ago, but the crisis never materialized. It is often maintained
that this was because Lula did everything that the financial
markets wanted. But across the border in Argentina, President
Nestor Kirchner did what the financial markets didn't want, and
the economy has been booming at about 9 percent annually for
more than three years.
Latin America's left governments are doing pretty well, regardless
of whether Washington or anyone else approves of their policies.
Venezuela is tied with Argentina as the fastest-growing economy
in the hemisphere. And Evo Morales has only been president of
Bolivia for half a year, but the government's increased revenues
from natural gas have helped to fund its reform program, and
its re-nationalization of the industry has not caused an economic
or political crisis.
Mexico will likely face problems as the big imbalances in the
U.S. economy -- the housing bubble, trade deficit, and unsustainably
low long-term interest rates -- are corrected. Our last recession
in 2001 cause a downturn in Mexico's economy, and the next one
will probably do the same. But Mexico's current economic policies,
which tend to sacrifice growth and employment in the fight against
inflation, may be the wrong recipe for recovery. Mexico may need
a Franklin D. Roosevelt at the helm in the next few years, rather
than a Herbert Hoover.
CounterPunch
Speakers Bureau Sick of sit-on-the-Fence speakers, tongue-tied and timid?
CounterPunch Editors Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St Clair
are available to speak forcefully on ALL the burning issues,
as are other CounterPunchers seasoned in stump oratory. Call
CounterPunch Speakers Bureau, 1-800-840-3683. Or email beckyg@counterpunch.org.