View source for Trust and Safety/Case Review Committee/Charter

== <translate><!--T:13--> Requirements</translate> ==

<translate><!--T:14-->
All Case Review Committee members are required to:

<!--T:15-->
# Abide by the terms of this charter;
# Sign committee-specific NDAs or other legal documents as required by the Wikimedia Foundation’s Legal department to obtain access to confidential case data;
# Agree that their Wikimedia user names will be shared with the Wikimedia Foundation, certain members of the Board of Trustees,<ref>The Chair, the Vice Chair, and the Chair of the Product Committee, which also advises Trust & Safety work within the Foundation</ref> the Ombudsman Commission, and other members of the Committee;
# Otherwise agree that their membership in the Case Review Committee will remain anonymous and that they will not share the legal identities or usernames of any other members of the Committee, in order to protect all volunteer participants in the committee from retaliation;<ref>Members may choose to disclose their own identities, but not the identities of other members, six months after their departure from or the dissolution of the committee.</ref>
# Complete a series of training on policies and protocols conducted by the Wikimedia Foundation’s Legal department;
# Be available to review cases before the Case Review Committee of up to five hours per week for most weeks for the duration of their appointment by reading existing Trust & Safety case files (not by independent investigation), with as much advance notice as possible of upcoming unavailability;
# Inform the General Counsel immediately if subject to any community sanctions during their term. Sanctions are not automatic grounds for exclusion, but will warrant counsel review; and
# Inform the Committee Chair and the General Counsel if at any time they are asked to review a case for which they feel they may have a conflict of interest (such as close relationship with an individual involved in a case) for their assessment of appropriateness of assignment. Individuals are encouraged to instead recuse themselves if they are aware that such a conflict does exist (whether positive or negative) or if they have been involved in the details of the case in question.</translate>