Are Gender Differences Status Differences?

• Alexander, C.N., and Wiley, M.G. (1981). Situated activity and identity formation. In M. Rosenberg and R. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 269–289 ). New York: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, L.R., and Blanchard, P.N. (1982). Sex differences in task and social-emotional behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 109–139.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bales, R.F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  Google Scholar 

• Bartol, K.M., and Martin, D.C. (1986). Women and men in task groups. In R.D. Ashmore and F.K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relations: A critical analysis of central concepts (pp. 259–310 ). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Becker, B.J. (1986). Influence again: Another look at studies of gender differences in social influence. In J.S. Hyde and M.C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 178–209 ). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Berger, J., and Conner, T. (1974). Performance expectation and behavior in small groups: A revised formulation. In J. Berger, T. Conner, and M.H. Fisek (Eds.), Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program (pp. 85–110 ). Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

  Google Scholar 

• Berger, J., Conner, T., and Fisek, M.H. (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

  Google Scholar 

• Berger, J., Fisek, M.H., Norman, R.Z., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction. New York: Elsevier.

  Google Scholar 

• Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479–508.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Berger, J., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (1985). Status, rewards, and influence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• Borgatta, E.F., and Stimson, J. (1963). Sex differences in interaction characteristics. Journal of Social Psychology, 60, 89–100.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Brown, S.M. (1979). Male versus female leaders: A comparison of empirical studies. Sex Roles, 5, 595–611.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Butler, D., and Geis, F.L. (1990). Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 48–59.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carbonell, J.L. (1984). Sex roles and leadership revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 44–49.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carli, L.L. (1982). Are women more social and men more task oriented? A meta-analytic review of sex differences in group interaction, reward allocation, coalition formation, and cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  Google Scholar 

• Carli, L.L. (1989). Gender differences in interaction style and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 565–576.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carli, L.L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 941–951.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cota, A.A., and Dion, K.L. (1986). Salience of gender and sex composition of ad hoc groups: An experimental test of distinctiveness theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 770–776.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Deaux, K., and Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dovidio, J.F., Brown, C.E., Heitman, K., Ellyson, S.L., and Keating, C.F. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender-linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580–587.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eagly, A.H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 38, 971–981.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Eagly, A.H., and Carli, L.L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1–20.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eagly, A.H., and Karau, S.J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685–710.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eagly, A.H., and Wood, W. (1985). Gender and influenceability: Stereotype versus behavior. In V.E. O’Leary, R.K. Unger, and B.S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology (pp. 225–256 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Fennell, M.L., Barchas, P., Cohen, E.G., McMahon, A.M., and Hildebrand, P. (1978). An alternative perspective on sex differences in organizational settings: The process of legitimation. Sex Roles, 4, 589–604.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fisek, M.H., and Ofshe, R. (1970). The process of status evolution. Sociometry, 33, 327–346.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fishman, P. (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems, 25, 397–406.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fleischer, R.A., and Chertkoff, J.M. (1986). Effects of dominance and sex on leader selection in dyadic work groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 94–99.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Foschi, M. (1988). Status characteristics, standards, and attributions. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, and B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress: New formulations (pp. 58–72 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Foschi, M. (1990). Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association, Victoria, B.C., May, 1990.

  Google Scholar 

• Hall, J.A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hall, K.E. (1972). Sex differences in initiation and influence in decision-making among prospective teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

  Google Scholar 

• Henley, N.M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Hoffman, C., and Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rational-ization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197–208.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hollander, E.P., and Julian, J.W. (1970). Studies in leadership legitimacy,influence, and innovation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 33–69 ). New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Jones, E.E. (1964). Ingratiation: A social psychological analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

  Google Scholar 

• Jones, E.E., and Pittman, T.S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-Presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Kollack, P., Blumstein, P., and Schwartz, P. (1985). Sex and power in interaction. American Sociological Review, 50, 34–47.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lockheed, M.E. (1985). Sex and social influence: A meta-analysis guided by theory. In J. Berger and M. Zelditch (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence (pp. 406–429 ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• Maccoby, E.E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A development account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Major, B., Schmidlin, A.M., and Williams, L. (1990). Gender patterns in social touch: The impact of setting and age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 634–643.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Maltz, D.N., and Borker, R.A. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J.J. Gumperz (Ed.), Language and social identity (pp. 196–266 ). New York: Cambridge.

  Google Scholar 

• Meeker, B.F., and Weitzel-O’Neill, P.A. (1977). Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups. American Sociological Review, 42, 9 1105.

  Google Scholar 

• Megaree, E.I. (1969). Influence of sex roles on the manifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 377–382.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nyquist, L.V., and Spence, J.T. (1986). Effects of dispositional dominance and sex role expectations on leadership behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 87–93.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Piliavin, J.A., and Martin, R.R. (1978). The effects of sex composition of groups on style of social interaction. Sex Roles, 4, 281–296.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pugh, M.D., and Wahrman, R. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? American Journal of Sociology, 88, 746–762.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ridgeway, C.L. (1978). Conformity, group-oriented motivation, and status attainment in small groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 41, 175–188.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ridgeway, C.L. (1982). Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47, 76–88.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ridgeway, C.L. (1983). The dynamics of small groups. New York: St. Martin’s.

  Google Scholar 

• Ridgeway, C.L. (1988). Gender differences in task groups: A status and legitmacy account. In M. Webster and M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 188–206 ). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Ridgeway, C.L., and Berger, J. (1986). Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review, 51, 603–617.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ridgeway, C.L., Berger, J. and Smith, L. (1985). Nonverbal cues and status: An expectation states approach. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 995–978.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ridgeway, C.L., and Johnson, C. (1990). What is the relationship between socio-emotional behavior and status in task groups? American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1189–1212.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shackleford, S., Wood, W., and Worchel, S. (1989). How can low status group members influence others? Team players and attention getters. Unpublished manuscript, Texas A and M University.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith-Lovin, L. (1988). The affective control of events within settings. In L. Smith-Lovin and D. Heise (Eds.), Analyzing social interaction: Advances in affect control theory (pp. 71–102 ). New York: Gordon and Breach.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith-Lovin, L., and Brody, C. (1989). Interruptions in group discussions: The effects of gender and group composition. American Sociological Review, 54, 424–435.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Strodtbeck, F.L., and Mann, R.D. (1956). Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 19, 3–11.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wagner, D.G. (1988). Gender inequalities in groups: A situational approach. In M. Webster and M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 55–68 ). Stanford, CA: Stanford Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Wagner, D.G., Ford, R.S., and Ford, T.W. (1986). Can gender inequalities be reduced? American Sociological Review, 51, 47–61.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wentworth, D.K., and Anderson, L.R. (1984). Emergent leadership as a function of sex and task type. Sex Roles, 11, 513–524.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• West, C. (1984). When the doctor is a “Lady”: Power, status and gender in physican-patient exchanges. Symbolic Interaction, 7, 87–106.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• West, C., and Zimmerman, D.H. (1977). Women’s place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent-child interaction. Social Problems, 24, 521–529.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wood, W., and Karten, S.J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 341–347. 180 Cecilia L. Ridgeway and David Diekema

  Google Scholar 

• Yamada, E.M., Tjosvold D., and Draguns, J.G. (1983). Effects of sex-linked situations and sex composition on cooperation and style of interaction. Sex Roles, 9, 541–553.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zimmerman, D.H., and West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions, and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne and N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105–129 ). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

  Google Scholar 

Download references