Abstract
Increased stress, psychosocial problems, economic disadvantages, and lack of prenatal care are proposed to explain discrepancies in the outcome of unintended pregnancies. Studies of maternal intention and pregnancy outcomes have yielded varied results. Objective is to review studies of the risk of low birth weight (LBW)/preterm births (PTB) associated with unintended pregnancies ending in a live birth. We reviewed studies reporting on maternal intentions and outcomes from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and bibliographies of identified articles. An unintended pregnancy was further classified as mistimed (not intended at that time) or unwanted (not desired at any time). Studies reporting an association between pregnancy intention and any of the outcomes were included. Study quality was assessed for biases in selection, exposure assessment, confounder adjustment, analyses, outcomes assessment, and attrition. Unadjusted and adjusted data from included studies were extracted by two reviewers. There were significantly increased odds of LBW among unintended pregnancies [odds ratio (OR) 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25, 1.48] ending in a live birth. Within the unintended category, mistimed (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13, 1.52) and unwanted (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.29, 1.78) pregnancies were associated with LBW. There were statistically significantly increased odds of PTB among unintended (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09, 1.58), and unwanted (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.41, 1.61) but not for mistimed (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.96, 1.93) pregnancies. Unintended, unwanted, and mistimed pregnancies ending in a live birth are associated with a significantly increased risk of LBW and PTB.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- LBW:
-
Low birth weight
- PTB:
-
Preterm birth
- SGA:
-
Small for gestational age
References
Bitto, A., Gray, R. H., Simpson, J. L., Queenan, J. T., Kambic, R. T., Perez, A., et al. (1997). Adverse outcomes of planned and unplanned pregnancies among users of natural family planning: a prospective study. American Journal of Public Health, 87(3), 338–343.
Orr, S. T., Miller, C. A., James, S. A., & Babones, S. (2000). Unintended pregnancy and preterm birth. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 14(4), 309–313.
Cartwright, A. (1988). Unintended pregnancies that lead to babies. Social Science and Medicine, 27(3), 249–254.
Mohllajee, A. P., Curtis, K. M., Morrow, B., & Marchbanks, P. A. (2007). Pregnancy intention and its relationship to birth and maternal outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109(3), 678–686.
Messer, L. C., Dole, N., Kaufman, J. S., & Savitz, D. A. (2005). Pregnancy intendedness, maternal psychosocial factors and preterm birth. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 9(4), 403–412.
Joyce, T. J., Kaestner, R., & Korenman, S. (2000). The effect of pregnancy intention on child development. Demography, 37(1), 83–94.
Hellerstedt, W. L., Pirie, P. L., Lando, H. A., Curry, S. J., McBride, C. M., Grothaus, L. C., et al. (1998). Differences in preconceptional and prenatal behaviors in women with intended and unintended pregnancies. American Journal of Public Health, 88(4), 663–666.
Sable, M. R., Spencer, J. C., Stockbauer, J. W., Schramm, W. F., Howell, V., & Herman, A. A. (1997). Pregnancy wantedness and adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences by race and Medicaid status. Family Planning Perspectives, 29(2), 76–81.
Morris, N. M., Udry, J. R., & Chase, C. L. (1973). Reduction of Low Birth Weight Birth Rates by the Prevention of Unwanted Pregnancies. American Journal of Public Health, 63(11), 935–938.
Stroup, D. F., Berlin, J. A., Morton, S. C., Olkin, I., Williamson, G. D., Rennie, D., et al. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(15), 2008–2012.
Higgins, P. T, Green. S. (2008). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration 2008 [cited 2008 Mar 1] (Version 5.0.0) Available from: URL: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
Peters, J., & Mengersen, K. (2008). Selective reporting of adjusted estimates in observational epidemiology studies: Reasons and implications for meta-analyses. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 31(4), 370–389.
Higgins, J. P., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558.
Afable-Munsuz, A., & Braveman, P. (2008). Pregnancy intention and preterm birth: differential associations among a diverse population of women. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 40(2), 66–73.
Durousseau, S., & Chavez, G. F. (2003). Associations of intrauterine growth restriction among term infants and maternal pregnancy intendedness, initial happiness about being pregnant, and sense of control. Pediatrics, 111(5 Part 2), 1171–1175.
Eggleston, E., Tsui, A. O., & Kotelchuck, M. (2001). Unintended pregnancy and low birthweight in Ecuador. American Journal of Public Health, 91(5), 808–810.
Gadow, E. C., Paz, J. E., Lopez-Camelo, J. S., Dutra, M. G., Queenan, J. T., Simpson, J. L., Jennings, V. H., Castilla, E. E. (1998). Unintended pregnancies in women delivering at 18 South American hospitals. NFP-ECLAMC Group. Latin American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations. Human Reproduction, 13(7), 1991–1995.
Hultin, M., Ottosson, J. O. (1971). Perinatal conditions of unwanted children. Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica Supplementum, 59–76.
Kost, K., Landry, D. J., & Darroch, J. E. (1998). The effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care. Family Planning Perspectives, 30(5), 223–230.
Pulley, L., Klerman, L. V., Tang, H., & Baker, B. A. (2002). The extent of pregnancy mistiming and its association with maternal characteristics and behaviors and pregnancy outcomes. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34(4), 206–211.
Sharma, R., Synkewecz, C., Raggio, T., & Mattison, D. R. (1994). Intermediate variables as determinants of adverse pregnancy outcome in high risk inner-city populations. Journal of the National Medical Association, 86(11), 857–860.
Baydar, N. (1995). Consequences for children of their birth planning status. Family planning perspectives, 27(6), 228–34, 245.
Keeton, K., & Hayward, R. A. (2007). Pregnancy intention and birth outcomes: does the relationship differ by age or race? Journal of Women’s Health(Larchmt), 16(4), 510–516.
McCormick, M. C., Brooks-Gunn, J., Shorter, T., Wallace, C. Y., Holmes, J. H., & Heagarty, M. C. (1987). The planning of pregnancy among low-income women in central Harlem. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 156(1), 145–149.
Unintended pregnancy–New York, 1988–1989. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report 1991, 40(42):723–725.
Bouchard, G. (2005). Adult couples facing a planned or an unplaned pregnancy: Two realities. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 619–637.
Korenman, S., Kaestner, R., & Joyce, T. (2002). Consequences for infants of parental disagreement in pregnancy intention. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34(4), 198–205.
Lakha, F., & Glasier, A. (2006). Unintended pregnancy and use of emergency contraception among a large cohort of women attending for antenatal care or abortion in Scotland. Lancet, 368(9549), 1782–1787.
Santelli, J., Rochat, R., Hatfield-Timajchy, K., Gilbert, B. C., Curtis, K., Cabral, R., et al. (2003). The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35(2), 94–101.
Kaufmann, R. B., Morris, L., & Spitz, A. M. (1997). Comparison of two question sequences for assessing pregnancy intentions. American Journal of Epidemiology, 145(9), 810–816.
Acknowledgments
We would sincerely like to thank Elizabeth Uleryk, Chief Librarian at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, for her contribution in developing search strategy and running searches on a periodic basis. We would also like to thank Karen Wade from Toronto Public Health Department for her critical review of this manuscript. Funding: This study was supported by funding from Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) Knowledge Synthesis/Translation grant # KRS 86242. CIHR has no role in analyses, writing of the report, interpretation of data or decision to submit the manuscript.
Conflict of interest statement
None for any authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
On behalf of Knowledge Synthesis Group on LBW/preterm birth.
Members of Knowledge Synthesis Group on determinants of LBW/preterm births: Prakesh Shah, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Arne Ohlsson, University of Toronto, Canada; Vibhuti Shah, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Kellie E Murphy, University of Toronto, Canada; Sarah D McDonald, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Eileen Hutton, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Christine Newburn-Cook, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Corine Frick, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Fran Scott, University of Toronto and Toronto Public Health, Toronto, Canada; Victoria Allen, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada; Joseph Beyene, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shah, P.S., Balkhair, T., Ohlsson, A. et al. Intention to Become Pregnant and Low Birth Weight and Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review. Matern Child Health J 15, 205–216 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0546-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0546-2