Content deleted Content added
|
|
|
{{Wikithanks|Thanks for being a vandal fighter.}}--[[User:I dream of horses|I dream of horses]] <span style="border:1px solid #ffa500;background:#ffce7b;"><small>If you reply here, please leave me a {{[[Template:Talkback|Talkback]]}} message on [[User talk:I dream of horses|my talk page]].</small></span> @ 03:38, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
== Primary and secondary sources ==
Please use high quality references per [[WP:MEDRS]] such as [[review articles]] or major textbooks. Note that [[review articles]] are NOT the same as [[peer reviewed]] articles. A good place to find medical sources is [http://www.tripdatabase.com/ TRIP database] Thanks.{{-}}[[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:03, 18 December 2013 (UTC) / We do not use primary sources to refute secondary ones.
:Nothing in WP:MEDRS forbid primary sources (use them with caution ; that's all) and there are already some in that statin article. Why not using primary source to modulate secondary sources or meta-analysis? If it's absolutely impossible so all the work of Popper about [[falsifiability]] of scientific theories is pure nonsense. Albert Einstein is reported to have said: "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong." So, a simple study can prove false a temporary paradigm based on consensus or meta-analysis. Don't forget [[http://pla.ce.bo.free.fr/images/galilee.gif Galileo]]!
:By the way, cardio-vascular specialists know nothing about cancer or immunology of cancer, like I do.
:Thank's for indicating me the TRIP database link I didn't know yet but I'm used to [[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed NCI/Pubmed]] which I find far better (and not commercial...) [[User:Double Vigie|Double Vigie]] ([[User talk:Double Vigie|talk]]) 00:26, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
|
