Content deleted Content added
Cyberbot II (talk | contribs) Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Food and drink}}, {{WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health}}. Remove 6 deprecated parameters: b1, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6. Tag: |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Food and drink |importance=Top |Foodservice=yes}}
}}
▲{{WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health |class= B |importance= low }}
== Old discussions ==
Line 20 ⟶ 17:
We can't say both "ISO 22000 is the new standard bound to replace HACCP" and in the next paragraph "ISO 22000 will not replace HACCP". Someone who knows what the real deal is, please correct this (I'm not qualified myself I'm afraid). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/85.112.166.103|85.112.166.103]] ([[User talk:85.112.166.103|talk]]) 06:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
AFAIK, ISO 22000 should be one of many certification standards, which is not the equivalent to HACCP. ISO 22000 (assuming it is equivalent to, e.g., FSSC 22000, SQF 8.1, BRC, etc.) is a set of standards that govern the food safety standards and employee & business practices. The various modern day standards and auiditing schemes all each have their own variances and overlap, but each notable scheme generally must meet or exceed the benchmark as set by the GFSI. HACCP, on the other hand, is (to put it more simply) a "tool" or "template" that is used by the majority of the food safety sector globally. While a complete and robust food safety system almost always include a current and well written HACCP/HARPC Plan, a HACCP plan in and of itself does not constitute as a complete Food Safety system, especially with the rapidity of evolving standards taking place in recent years. In fact, many certifying bodies that audit for the, e.g., SQF 8.1 for Manufacturing standard also offer a HACCP stand-alone audit (often recommended to newer companies or those preparing to pursue a GFSI-level certification). As far as I can think of, I believe there may be two sources of confusion being the cause here: 1) the adoption and relatively recent implementation of HARPC, though it does not exactly "replace" HACCP in a realistic sense, or 2) the increasing prevalence of retailer-driven requirements for vendors to have a current GFSI equivalent certification (with some exceptions, such as Costco -- whom requires and addendum audit -- or Trader Joe's -- whom contracted SAI Global to provide auditing services for a custom-tailored and more intensive TJ's audit, etc). However, in both cases, the HACCP plan itself is still intact (except maybe those who are regulated by -- and this is in the US that I am referring to -- FDA only with no USDA grant of inspection; even then, I can't say for sure having only a HARPC Plan is viable).
By the way, I work at a frozen food manufacturer in the US as the SQF Practitioner Primary and PCQI, and I developed and maintain our HACCP plan, which is only one of many programs in place. [[User:Rannison|Rannison]] ([[User talk:Rannison|talk]]) 10:57, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
I'm embarrassed to say, but my previous comment was not entirely accurate. I've recently answered a Quora post<ref>{{Cite web|title=What is difference between Haccp and ISO 22000?|url=https://www.quora.com/What-is-difference-between-Haccp-and-ISO-22000|access-date=2021-10-08|website=Quora|language=en}}</ref> regarding this topic, which you may reference for corrected information. [[User:Rannison|Rannison]] ([[User talk:Rannison|talk]]) 8:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}
== External links modified ==
Line 33 ⟶ 38:
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
Cheers. —[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 05:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
== External links modified ==
Line 48 ⟶ 53:
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 06:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
== Radiological ==
"Radiological hazards" is not a categorical addition to the three hazard types (although in the initial years when the FSMA rollout was impending, I saw and had erroneously believed myself that it was). In current HACCP/HARPC plans (in the US at least), radiological hazards of concern are addressed under chemical hazards. [[User:Rannison|Rannison]] ([[User talk:Rannison|talk]]) 11:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
== List the hazards introduce by irrigation practices ==
Becuase I want more knowlegde [[Special:Contributions/41.113.4.193|41.113.4.193]] ([[User talk:41.113.4.193|talk]]) 11:37, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
| |||