Content deleted Content added
SMcCandlish (talk | contribs) |
SMcCandlish (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 129:
:I don't think the limited content on the article is intentional. The best way to expand an article to put in the work yourself. [[User:Zenomonoz|Zenomonoz]] ([[User talk:Zenomonoz|talk]]) 08:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
::Do you believe it would go better under "Modern Eugenics" or "History"? I'm also considering renaming "Modern Eugenics" as it covers more speculation on ethics. [[User:CLMeadow|CLMeadow]] ([[User talk:CLMeadow|talk]]) 19:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
:::Neither, but in the "Forced sterilization" section, since both of those are about alleged forced sterilization (some claims of which turn out not to be true, but are really cases of something like "enticed sterilization", though of course the motivation behind it is still eugenic). Have you actually read the article? You seem unaware of its basic structure yet are convinced that it is faulty. And let's do one thing at a time; it's unclear exactly what you mean by "as it covers more speculation on ethics", and "Modern eugenics" appears to be a perfectly reasonable section heading for material on eugenics-related debate from the 1980s onward (nor have you suggested an alternative – no one here is a mind reader. :-) <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — [[User:SMcCandlish|'''SMcCandlish''']] [[User talk:SMcCandlish|☏]] [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|¢]] 😼 </span> 12:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
== Revealed: US pro-birth conference’s links to far-right eugenicists ==
| |||