Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 323:
:::'''Proposal''': Reword what PTM currently says to "It is <s>entirely</s> often proper to include such placenames in the '''See also''' section of disambiguation pages with the specific title". [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 10:13, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
:::I don't think this is just for see also, because I have encountered numerous examples of toponyms where this would not match real-world circumstances, and this sort of a thing could well be controversial. --[[User:Joy|Joy]] ([[User talk:Joy|talk]]) 14:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
::::I think in the case of "Vic", for most places like "Vic-sur-Aisne" it is common to use plain "Vic" when there is no ambiguity. For instance in the neighbouring town Cœuvres-et-Valsery the road leading to Vic-sur-Aisne is called "Route de Vic", Similarly, the "Route de Rabastens" leads to Rabastens-en-Bigorre. So yes, I think places like Vic-sur-Aisne should be listed on the disambiguation page "Vic". The "-sur-Aisne" is not really generic, more a specifier or disambiguator (because there are several places named "Vic"). [[User:Markussep|Markussep]] <sup>[[User talk:Markussep|Talk]]</sup> 08:09, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
| |||