www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Colour wheel theory of love: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edit by 176.205.205.173 (talk) to last version by 2604:F580:14D:6600:7032:35D5:ED54:EDB8
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 17:
Erotic lovers view [[marriage]] as an extended [[honeymoon]], and sex as the ultimate aesthetic experience. They tend to address their lovers with pet names, such as "sweetie" or "sexy". An erotic lover can be perceived as a "hopeless romantic". The erotic lover wants to share and know everything about their loved one and often thinks of their partner in an idealized manner. The erotic lover's reaction to criticism from their partner is one of hurt and intense pain. The erotic lover's reaction to separation from the partner is agony and despair. Those of other love styles may see erotic lovers as unrealistic, or trapped in a fantasy.
 
The advantage of erotic love is that the hormones and emotions cause lovers to bond with each other, and feelings of lust and feelings of love alternatively reinforce each other. It is very relaxing for the person doing it. It affords a sense of security to both partners who recognize and see sexual complementation in each other and a sense of life's purpose. Sexual contentment lies at the bottom of [[Maslow's hierarchy of needs]] along with hunger and shelter.<ref>Lumen Learning (2022). Introduction to Business. Lumen Learning https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wmintrobusiness/chapter/reading-need-based-motivation-theories/</ref> It requires both partners to accord validity to each other's sexual feelings, work on sustaining interest and maintain the sexual health of the relationship. A disadvantage is the possibility of the decay in attraction and the danger of living in a fantasy world. In its extreme, Eros can resemble [[naivety]]. A partner not as sexually inclined may also feel one's physical body being taken for granted and may perceive the Eros lover as looking for carnal gratification.
 
Examples of Eros may be seen in movies including ''[[The Blue Lagoon (1980 film)|The Blue Lagoon]]'', ''[[Return to the Blue Lagoon]]'', ''[[Pretty Woman]]'', ''[[Working Girl]]'', and ''[[Girl with a Pearl Earring (film)|Girl with a Pearl Earring]]''.
Line 115:
 
==Measurement==
Clyde Hendrick and Susan Hendrick of [[Texas Tech University]] expanded on this theory in the mid-1980s with their extensive research on what they called "love styles". Their study found that male students tend to be more ludicLudic, whereas female students tend to be Storgic and Pragmatic.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.confisus.co.uk/mindlabs/blackeyedsusan/Documents/Hendrick%20and%20Hendrick%20Love%20attitudes.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2014-12-19 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141219175815/http://www.confisus.co.uk/mindlabs/blackeyedsusan/Documents/Hendrick%20and%20Hendrick%20Love%20attitudes.pdf |archive-date=2014-12-19 }}</ref> Whilst the Ludic love style may predominate in men under age thirty, studies on more mature men have shown that the majority of them do indeed mature into desiring monogamy, marriage, and providing for their family by age thirty.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Why do men marry and why do they stray?|first1=Jeffrey|last1=Winking|first2=Hillard|last2=Kaplan|first3=Michael|last3=Gurven|first4=Stacey|last4=Rucas|date=7 July 2007|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences|volume=274|issue=1618|pages=1643–1649|doi=10.1098/rspb.2006.0437|pmid=17456459|pmc=2169272}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|title=Genetic variation in the vasopressin receptor 1a gene (AVPR1A) associates with pair-bonding behavior in humans|first1=Hasse|last1=Walum|first2=Lars|last2=Westberg|first3=Susanne|last3=Henningsson|first4=Jenae M.|last4=Neiderhiser|first5=David|last5=Reiss|first6=Wilmar|last6=Igl|first7=Jody M.|last7=Ganiban|first8=Erica L.|last8=Spotts|first9=Nancy L.|last9=Pedersen|first10=Elias|last10=Eriksson|first11=Paul|last11=Lichtenstein|date=16 September 2008|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|volume=105|issue=37|pages=14153–14156|doi=10.1073/pnas.0803081105|pmid=18765804|pmc=2533683|bibcode=2008PNAS..10514153W|doi-access=free}}</ref>
 
Hendrick and Hendrick (1986) developed a self-report questionnaire measure of Lee's love styles, known as the Love Attitudes Scale (LAS).<ref name=":0">{{cite journal |vauthors=Hendrick C, Hendrick SS |title=A theory and method of love |journal=Journal of Personality and Social Psychology |volume=50 |issue=2 |pages=392–402 |date=Feb 1986 |doi=10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.392}}</ref> A shortened version of the LAS, presumably for researchers trying to keep their surveys as concise as possible, was later published,<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Hendrick C, Hendrick SS, Dicke A |title=The Love Attitudes Scale: Short form |journal=J Pers Soc Psychol |volume=15 |issue=2 |pages=147–59 |year=1998 |doi=10.1177/0265407598152001 |s2cid=145583028 }}</ref> and other variations appear to have been used by some researchers. Respondents indicate their level of agreement or disagreement with the LAS items, examples of which include "My partner and I have the right physical 'chemistry'" (eros) and "Our love is the best kind because it grew out of a long friendship" (storge). Depending on the version of the LAS one administers, there are from 3 to 7 items for each of the six styles described above. A 2002 article illustrated the use of the LAS.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Fricker J, Moore S |title=Relationship Satisfaction: The role of Love Styles and Attachment Styles |journal=Current Research in Social Psychology |volume=7 |issue=11 |year=2002 |url=http://www.uiowa.edu/~grpproc/crisp/crisp.7.11.htm |access-date=2016-05-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080117182741/http://www.uiowa.edu/~grpproc/crisp/crisp.7.11.htm |archive-date=2008-01-17 |url-status=dead }}</ref>