Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 19

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 00:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• EarthBound 3 → Mother 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"earthbound" is mother 2, with mother being referred to as "earthbound beginnings" when it finally got officially released outside of japan. some fans used to refer to mother as "earthbound zero" before. in any possible case that doesn't involve not knowing that the franchise has a different name in japan or being from an alternate timeline where mother was released internationally with its intended international name (earth bound), mother 3 would be earthbound 2 cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. By your own logic, this redirect should point towards Mother 4, a game that does not exist. We have a page titled Mother 4, but it is a redirect towards Earthbound fandom#Fangames, which talks about two fan-projects that took the name 'Mother 4', neither of which have released. In any case, if someone searches for 'Earthbound 3', I would assume first that they were looking for Mother 3 (and had forgotten that the franchise has a different name (edit: AND numbering schema 19:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)) in Japan), over assuming they were looking for a fan-project that never released. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep While it is true that if localized, Mother 3 will probably be called Earthbound 2, it is an easy error for fans to make and therefore a believable search target. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - agree with the above BugGhost🪲👻 16:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - The chain of thought is easy to follow. I want Mother 3. The Mother series is EarthBound in the west. Thus, I should search for EarthBound 3. This is the best target. Fieari (talk) 04:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Anabaptist Healthshare → Health care sharing ministry  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Singular mention of this organization that this redirect was intended for was removed in October 2023 per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Mention is unlikely to be restored. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 20:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not help readers.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 08:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not mentioned, potentially confusing, serves no navigational purpose. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:39B9:A943:564A:3BA (talk) 23:09, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• It hurts it hurts it hurts it hurts it hurts it hurts it hurts it hurts → Yahtzee Croshaw#Chzo Mythos  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

like with "intruder alert! intruder alert!" before, i don't think a basic thing said multiple times in this manner can be primarily associated to one person or piece of media. also not or at least no longer mentioned in the target, i guess cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 19:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete delete delete delete delete as vague per nom. Also, potentially Daftify. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 20:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as definitively implausible. The target section of the redirect doesn't even exist, and the phrase doesn't exist in that article anyway. — Smuckola(talk) 03:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as confusing at best --Lenticel ^(talk) 04:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I'm actually not confused by this one, and quite familiar with the reference (the Chzo Mythos is surprisingly compelling), but it's utterly unneeded and not particularly notable, even amongst fans. I'm sure Croshaw doesn't have a monopoly on this phrase anyway. Fieari (talk) 05:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This seems to be extremely generic, based on internet search. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy close without prejudice due to the ongoing move discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 10:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• X (social network) → Twitter  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Currently, there's a discussion for moving Twitter under Elon Musk to this page name, for consistency, it should redirect to Twitter under Elon Musk. However, today it was retargeted to Twitter, making it strange. Web-julio (talk) 17:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — Like you noted, there's an active requested move at Twitter under Elon Musk where people are currently discussing this exact thing. I'd ask that you consider withdrawing this RFD and talking about it in the RM instead; we really don't need to drag this debate across every single venue on Wikipedia. Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 17:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I second Dylnuge here. While I have already given my thoughts at the recently reopened RM, I do not think this is good practice to have a separate RfD for this redirect at this time. @Web-julio, please, withdraw or I !vote for a speedy close. Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted per G5 by CactusWriter. (non-admin closure) — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 17:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:J.Williams → J. Williams  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The disambiguation page was never a draft. This was a result of a previous redirect hijacking from sockpuppets. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 16:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 14:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Candidates in the 2022 French legislative election → List of deputies not running for re-election in the 2022 French legislative election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Target is opposite of redirect, doesn't have the contents one would expect when searching for this Fram (talk) 13:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There doesn't appear to be such a list on enwiki at the moment. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 17:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close shadowing the closure at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fashion in China. by Wcquidditch. The issue at hand here is now moot and the nominator has expressed a desire for withdrawal. No prejudice against renomination here at any time. (non-admin closure) — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 01:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Fashion in China → Fashion in China.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is now a "Fashion in China." page (note full stop). I've redirected this redirect to point there, but ideally we can delete the redirect and then move the new page to not have the full stop. (Edit to add: I know technically this belongs on the technical requests page, but since the new page already exists, I think it makes sense here?) Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget back to Chinese clothing, like it was earlier today. Fashion in China. should probably get deleted or merged into Chinese clothing seeing as it seems to be a one-editor job with a lot of cross over, and it was only moved out of draft-space today. BugGhost🪲👻 15:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Fair enough, should I go ahead and revert my change and add Fashion in China. to AfD? Smallangryplanet (talk) 22:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget back to Chinese clothing; send Fashion in China. to AfD. In the event that Fashion in China. is kept (which is unlikely tbh), it can easily be moved over Fashion in China as the latter is merely a redirect. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 16:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Move over redirect and suppress the title with improper punctuation. Whatever happens with the 'Fashion in China' title (e.g. it remains as an article or becomes a redirect again) aside, 'Fashion in China.' should not exist as a tile because that title format has no affinity to this topic over any other. Trivial history on the unpunctuated title, making a histmerge likely unnecessary. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 18:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted my change to the original redirect, am I able to close this as no action taken or does an admin need to do so? I can't imagine there will be any additional discussion. Smallangryplanet (talk) 12:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are instructions for non-admins that want to close an RfD; they're Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Non-administrators_closing_discussions here for the "non-admin" instructions (what you're allowed to do and how you should go about it), and here for the RfD-specific instructions on how closing an article works.

For the record, I believe the correct result would be "Nomination Withdrawn". 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Make it mac tonight → Mac Tonight  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Absolutely unnecessary redirect. Bgsu98 (Talk) 04:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Being completely unfamiliar with this advertising campaign (and not really wanting to become more familiar) I'm not sure whether it's a necessary redirect or not but a Google search reveals the last line of a Mac Tonight jingle may in fact have been "Make it Mac Tonight!" (although my source is a Reditt post and I wasn't subjecting myself to the video so take that with a pinch of salt unless anyone else can find it mentioned in a reliable source). It's Mac Tonight is also a redirect to this page with it categorised as a redirect from a lyric. Adam Black ^{talk • contribs} 04:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect was also created by a user who was blocked as a long-term vandal, so I tagged this redirect as a Speedy Delete (G5) after sending it here. BTW, if you didn't experience this ad campaign in person, you didn't truly experience the 1980's. Bgsu98 (Talk) 04:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Per above. Just found this via the ANI thread. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Per above. It's just as invalid and implausible as "it's mac tonight", like any other obsessive WP:FANCRUFT campaign to pretend to make something out of nothing, and try to make "fetch" happen. — Smuckola(talk) 05:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).