User talk:ThaddeusB: Difference between revisions

Thanks for the tip.

I'm not going to bother to fight this in the same way any more. I'm taking this to WP:AIV. — Alan^✉ 20:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I just ask you why you blocked me? I did as you requested and created the discussion topic. However, you still went ahead and blocked me anyway. It seems to me that you didn't give me much of a chance and were just carrying out some kind of vendetta.

I don't understand. I said arguably terrible quality. And it was arguably terrible, backed up by the fact that it was cancelled and had very low ratings indeed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colonelfistertaketwo (talk • contribs) 18:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? I'm sure if you looked hard enough you'd find much worse examples than that on this site...Also, not that I'm conceding to your point, but who cares about being against someone like Littlejohn anyway? I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who would complain about what I wrote. Therefore, I put to you that you are being overly neurotic about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colonelfistertaketwo (talk • contribs) 18:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a question of quality though is it? I made a deduction based on the information already given that in no way altered the direction of the article. My contribution was totally inoffensive and I think that if you actually thought about it, you would see that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colonelfistertaketwo (talk • contribs) 18:28, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not. The information served to reiterate the fact that Littlejohn failed in his foray into television. I believe that that is a useful piece of information, and in no way "sloppy and unprofessional". Therefore, I request that you replace my contribution. --Colonelfistertaketwo (talk) 19:18, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Colonelfistertaketwo (talk) 18:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism at cloud computing. I have warned the user. samj (talk) 06:23, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Thaddeus, I really appreciate the barnstar. ;) And, I'm just doing my job with reverting nonsense from articles, I gots to do it. Thanks again. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:35, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you mean by this however, I don't work in or for the site. I am a user of the site and noticed that it did not have a wikipedia article. I am new to creating and editing wikipedia and just copied factual information from the site, If you wish to correct what I have written please look at the site and feel free to do so. thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spindoctor69 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I admit I left a nasty comment on a discussion page and I shouldn't have, but is that REALLY a reason for you to go around reverting my edits? All I did was take out a bit in the Deuce Bigalow:Male Gigalow entry because I didn't think the comments of a political pundit were relevant to an entry on a comedy film, and I explained myself on the discussion page. I'm not a vandal and I do not feel it is fair for you to treat me like one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.224.68.67 (talk) 19:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]