User talk:ThaddeusB: Difference between revisions

Thanks for the tip.

I'm not going to bother to fight this in the same way any more. I'm taking this to WP:AIV. — Alan^✉ 20:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not. The information served to reiterate the fact that Littlejohn failed in his foray into television. I believe that that is a useful piece of information, and in no way "sloppy and unprofessional". Therefore, I request that you replace my contribution. --Colonelfistertaketwo (talk) 19:18, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Colonelfistertaketwo (talk) 18:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. I said arguably terrible quality. And it was arguably terrible, backed up by the fact that it was cancelled and had very low ratings indeed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colonelfistertaketwo (talk • contribs) 18:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? I'm sure if you looked hard enough you'd find much worse examples than that on this site...Also, not that I'm conceding to your point, but who cares about being against someone like Littlejohn anyway? I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who would complain about what I wrote. Therefore, I put to you that you are being overly neurotic about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colonelfistertaketwo (talk • contribs) 18:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a question of quality though is it? I made a deduction based on the information already given that in no way altered the direction of the article. My contribution was totally inoffensive and I think that if you actually thought about it, you would see that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colonelfistertaketwo (talk • contribs) 18:28, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]