User talk:CanonNi
My talk page | |||||||||
|
Messages older than 3 days may be manually archived and added to one of the following categories when more than 3 sections are present:
|
Leave me a new message |
This means that if I don't reply to your message quickly, it's not because I'm ignoring you, I'm probably just asleep.
Invite to Draft
Draft:Anuvadi Swara has been created. Link is https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Anuvadi_Svara#References Kharavela Deva (talk) 13:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Kharavela Deva please move the citations to the end of the statements they support (instead of in the "references" section). See Help:Referencing for beginners for more info. I've fixed some formatting issues for you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
stop that
stop deleting my messages and no i did not commit arson 5.62.145.144 (talk) 13:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't. Nobody said you commited arson. Wikipedia is not for hosting hoaxes. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 14:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- first of all. yes you dd.
- second: this is not a Hoaxes this is real. not a hoax ;) 5.62.145.144 (talk) 14:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Your messages were removed, but not by me. Also, yeah... no. It wouldn't have been deleted if it wasn't a hoax. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 14:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Request to review an AfC
Hello CanonNi, I hope you are good. I submitted a draft a few weeks ago and it was reviewed by a reviewer, I made the suggested changes, however, since then, I am unable to contact that reviewer. I was wondering if you could have a look at that draft and review it. I would be very grateful to you. Synchaas (talk) 12:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Synchaas sorry, but I, like many other AfC reviewers, do not review drafts on request. It's in good shape though, and should be reviewed soon. Feel free to ask here or at the Teahouse if you have any other questions. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 13:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Understandable, have a good day. Synchaas (talk) 14:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Is it a given name or a patronym
Hi CanonNi, would you like to review this edit considering that both articles in the DAB suggest that this is a patronym rather than a given name? TIA Andrewa (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Andrewa you're right, I've fixed the error. Thanks for pointing it out! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks... an excellent example of The Wikipedia Creed in action. Andrewa (talk) 00:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Question from Aline.flament (16:27, 28 June 2024)
Hi CanonNi, I am trying to publish an article in the name of the company (Westlake Epoxy) I am working for but my article was rejected.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. I should rewrite my submission in a more encyclopedic format and avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
I don't know what they mean and how to proceed. Could you help me?
Thank you! Best regards, Aline --Aline.flament (talk) 16:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)