www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

User talk:BilCat: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:BilCat/archive25. (BOT)
Line 83: Line 83:
* [[User talk:BilCat/archive28|Archive28]]
* [[User talk:BilCat/archive28|Archive28]]
}}
}}

== Edit of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helicopter_Interdiction_Tactical_Squadron ==

Hello Bill. You recently did an edit to the Coast Guard HITRON page I had edited and you stated no source stated. The problem is, the “only” source available are the actual people, such as myself, that actually built the unit up from ground zero. Their were only 10 of us, be happy to have a “second” of one of the other plank owner members back me up on any and all info I add to this page, as, not to boast, I am a subject matter expert on. Please do me the courtesy and contact me direct on this request. I anm older now annd a dinosaur when it comes to a lot of computer and Wiki protocols so please, not to excuse my lack of this knowledge, but trying the best I can do as I always do through a 32yr military career. Appreciate your time. Charlie [[User:H10Plank|H10Plank]] ([[User talk:H10Plank|talk]]) 02:07, 16 September 2023 (UTC)


== Oops ==
== Oops ==

Revision as of 13:26, 3 October 2023


Oops

Mixed up the before and after on the Gimli Glider edit. Mea culpa, thanks for the fix. –IagoQnsi (talk) 05:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I've mixed up diffs plenty of times myself. At first I wasn't sure what had happened, but once I looked at you userpage, talk page, and recent contributions, I figured it was probably a mistake. I just made my edit as clear as possible (on then second try!), and moved on. I'm glad that you realized your mistake, and that you let me know. Take care. BilCat (talk) 07:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently noticed your addition of a label about the criticism or controversy section of this article and alleging it may compromise neutrality. I'm unsure of adding it to the "development" section, even though it seemed from the beginning to me that since the C-17 plans were stolen from Boeing and the Xi'an Y-20 is a copy more or less, it probably would best go there since that was an integral part of the development of the aircraft. However, I have seen a lot of other articles where things like this are specifically listed in a "Controversy" section. Do you have any recommendations on which part of the article this information should go in? Thanks. jlcoving (talk) 19:46, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not right off, though it's probably best to bring this up on the article's talk page to get broader input. BilCat (talk) 19:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]