User:Kenneth M Burke: Difference between revisions
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===Kenneth Morgan Burke=== |
===Kenneth Morgan Burke=== |
||
---- |
---- |
||
* Not to be confused with the lawyer from Belleville, IL (though it appears we went to the same college). |
* Not to be confused with the lawyer from Belleville, IL (though it appears we went to the same college). When I signed up to Wikipedia, I really did not know Kenneth M Burke would be tagged to everything I did. I chose to sign up with my real name because I guess I simply do not understand the use of pen names and multiple users. I certainly do understand user privacy, but I have no qualms in being who I am, Kenneth Burke. |
||
* '''Grammar: ''' Nobody is perfect, and everyone can always benefit from a review: [http://www.arts.uottawa.ca/writcent/hypergrammar/ HyperGrammar] |
* '''Grammar: ''' Nobody is perfect, and everyone can always benefit from a review: [http://www.arts.uottawa.ca/writcent/hypergrammar/ HyperGrammar] |
||
: & I simply like to copy edit. |
: & I simply like to copy edit. |
||
| Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
[[Image:Maple,OakForest.jpg|thumb|250px|[[Maple]] and [[Oak]] (broadleaf, deciduous) forest in [[Wisconsin]] in winter.]] |
[[Image:Maple,OakForest.jpg|thumb|250px|[[Maple]] and [[Oak]] (broadleaf, deciduous) forest in [[Wisconsin]] in winter.]] |
||
|} |
|} |
||
===Notes=== |
===Notes=== |
||
<sup>1</sup> It might be debated whether Bertalanffy would necessarily be directly categorized as a neo-Kantian philosopher. The theorist critiques and offers perspective for a redefinition of Kantian epistemology, and, in this respect, clearly shared much in common with Jean Piaget. In particular, see “An Essay on the Relativity of Categories,” ''Philosophy of Science'', Vol. 22, No. 4, (1955): 243–263, Heinz Werner Lectures “Organismic Psychology and Systems Theory” by Bertalanffy, and “On the Development of Memory and Identity” by Piaget (Worchester, MA, Clark University Heinz Werner Institute).<br> |
<sup>1</sup> It might be debated whether Bertalanffy would necessarily be directly categorized as a neo-Kantian philosopher. The theorist critiques and offers perspective for a redefinition of Kantian epistemology, and, in this respect, clearly shared much in common with Jean Piaget. In particular, see “An Essay on the Relativity of Categories,” ''Philosophy of Science'', Vol. 22, No. 4, (1955): 243–263, Heinz Werner Lectures “Organismic Psychology and Systems Theory” by Bertalanffy, and “On the Development of Memory and Identity” by Piaget (Worchester, MA, Clark University Heinz Werner Institute).<br> |
||
Revision as of 16:42, 26 June 2007
Welcome
Kenneth Morgan Burke
- Not to be confused with the lawyer from Belleville, IL (though it appears we went to the same college). When I signed up to Wikipedia, I really did not know Kenneth M Burke would be tagged to everything I did. I chose to sign up with my real name because I guess I simply do not understand the use of pen names and multiple users. I certainly do understand user privacy, but I have no qualms in being who I am, Kenneth Burke.
- Grammar: Nobody is perfect, and everyone can always benefit from a review: HyperGrammar
- & I simply like to copy edit.
|
Some Contributions Wikifile - Not sure why, I should work on my user page.
Copy editing |
|
 |
 |
Notes
1 It might be debated whether Bertalanffy would necessarily be directly categorized as a neo-Kantian philosopher. The theorist critiques and offers perspective for a redefinition of Kantian epistemology, and, in this respect, clearly shared much in common with Jean Piaget. In particular, see “An Essay on the Relativity of Categories,” Philosophy of Science, Vol. 22, No. 4, (1955): 243–263, Heinz Werner Lectures “Organismic Psychology and Systems Theory” by Bertalanffy, and “On the Development of Memory and Identity” by Piaget (Worchester, MA, Clark University Heinz Werner Institute).
2 Edgar H. Schein became an influential organizational psychologist when the area sought to evaluate and redefine itself throughout the 1970s. In Organizational Psychology (N.J., Prentice-Hall, 1980) the author references many of the classics in organizational theory and management throughout the Cold War era, including readings such as Dalton, M., Men Who Manage (New York, Wiley, 1959) and Cartwright, D. (ed.), Studies in social power, (Ann Arbor, Mich, University of Michigan press, 1959).
3 The source referenced is from a special issue of Social Psychology Quarterly 53(2) on social structure and psychology, edited by James S. House and Jeylan T. Mortimer, which includes a range of important themes such as stratification.