Talk:Wars of the Roses: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Wars of the Roses/Archive 1) (bot |
→Lead image: Reply |
||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
The current lead image (a 20th century painting of a [[Shakespeare]] play), whilst nice, is probably more fitting for ''[[Henry VI, Part 1]]'' than it is for a series of very real wars that took place in the 15th century. We could go for a depiction of any of the battles instead, or the collage of images that I have put forward, which are pictures of the four kings most involved in the fighting. Thoughts? [[User:Tim O'Doherty|Tim O'Doherty]] ([[User talk:Tim O'Doherty|talk]]) 22:37, 4 February 2023 (UTC) |
The current lead image (a 20th century painting of a [[Shakespeare]] play), whilst nice, is probably more fitting for ''[[Henry VI, Part 1]]'' than it is for a series of very real wars that took place in the 15th century. We could go for a depiction of any of the battles instead, or the collage of images that I have put forward, which are pictures of the four kings most involved in the fighting. Thoughts? [[User:Tim O'Doherty|Tim O'Doherty]] ([[User talk:Tim O'Doherty|talk]]) 22:37, 4 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Hi Tim. Did there end up being a discussion on this? While I don't have a problem with the new image (which is consistent with many other lead images on medieval/early modern warfare articles), I do think that the original worked very well as a symbolic representation of the conflict - capturing the essence of the conflict as a contest between two families and instantly evoking (and explaining) the name of the war itself (in spite of the fact that the actual scene is fictional of course). I'd prefer the original, but I'm all for further discussion. [[User:Otters B. Bothers|Otters B. Bothers]] ([[User talk:Otters B. Bothers|talk]]) 06:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:28, 19 March 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wars of the Roses article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
Wars of the Roses was a Warfare good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 22, 2005, May 22, 2006, and May 22, 2007. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The name.
The article still doesn’t say what this war (these battles) were called just prior to being called The Wars of the Roses.
Were they still called The Civil War, until the "Great Rebellion" became The Civil War?
In 1814 (Walter Scott)?
After 1911? English Civil War#Terminology
Any validity for "Cousin's War"?
MBG02 (talk) 17:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- To (kind of) answer my own question…
- Archives says Cousins’ War probably arose with the novels of Philipa Gregory.
- The first use by Philippa Gregory (that I can see), is in The White Queen (2009). Google says Kevin P Phillips published The Cousins' Wars (1999).
- The same post has a link which fails (for me), but Google can get it: http://www.susanhigginbotham.com/blog/posts/the-myth-of-the-cousins-war-a-guest-post-by-leanda-de-lisle/ .
- That blog says the term Wars of the Roses can be dated to David Hume (I guess c1762). The blog, and this article, mention Shakespeare's roses (implying the name could be older).
- MBG02 (talk) 07:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Draft:Leadership in the Wars of the Roses requires attention
Draft:Leadership in the Wars of the Roses exists for a long time. At AfC review it was suggested that before splitting it should be discussed here. Though the main author lost interest in the article (I think so, maybe I'm wrong), the article looks well-sourced. Would be great if somebody would look / accept / comment on it. Artem.G (talk) 16:46, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
note re article revisions
I made a few revisions. just two or three. or maybe more. hope everyone finds them helpful. thanks! Sm8900 (talk) 17:47, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Lead image
The current lead image (a 20th century painting of a Shakespeare play), whilst nice, is probably more fitting for Henry VI, Part 1 than it is for a series of very real wars that took place in the 15th century. We could go for a depiction of any of the battles instead, or the collage of images that I have put forward, which are pictures of the four kings most involved in the fighting. Thoughts? Tim O'Doherty (talk) 22:37, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Tim. Did there end up being a discussion on this? While I don't have a problem with the new image (which is consistent with many other lead images on medieval/early modern warfare articles), I do think that the original worked very well as a symbolic representation of the conflict - capturing the essence of the conflict as a contest between two families and instantly evoking (and explaining) the name of the war itself (in spite of the fact that the actual scene is fictional of course). I'd prefer the original, but I'm all for further discussion. Otters B. Bothers (talk) 06:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class Medieval warfare articles
- Medieval warfare task force articles
- C-Class Middle Ages articles
- High-importance Middle Ages articles
- C-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- C-Class Lancashire and Cumbria articles
- High-importance Lancashire and Cumbria articles
- C-Class Yorkshire articles
- High-importance Yorkshire articles
- WikiProject Yorkshire articles
- C-Class England-related articles
- High-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- C-Class Medieval Scotland articles
- Mid-importance Medieval Scotland articles
- C-Class Scotland articles
- Mid-importance Scotland articles
- All WikiProject Scotland pages
- C-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- C-Class European history articles
- Mid-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages