Talk:Postal service privatization: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Substing templates: {{Sofixit}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info. |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub| |
|||
{{Philately}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Philately |importance=Mid|attention=yes}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Murray Rothbard== |
==Murray Rothbard== |
||
Apparently the reference to Murray Rothbard is politically motivated, and verges on an advertisement for Libertarian ideologues. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:70.123.140.199|70.123.140.199]] ([[User talk:70.123.140.199|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/70.123.140.199|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> 18:07, 27 July 2011 |
Apparently the reference to Murray Rothbard is politically motivated, and verges on an advertisement for Libertarian ideologues. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:70.123.140.199|70.123.140.199]] ([[User talk:70.123.140.199|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/70.123.140.199|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> 18:07, 27 July 2011 |
||
:Are you suggesting the statement is untrue. It is properly sourced. [[User:Ww2censor|ww2censor]] ([[User talk:Ww2censor|talk]]) 00:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC) |
:Are you suggesting the statement is untrue. It is properly sourced. [[User:Ww2censor|ww2censor]] ([[User talk:Ww2censor|talk]]) 00:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
::I don't think it's in doubt whether or not this is an accurate quote, rather the issue is whether it is appropriate to include a single person's opinion in this way. [[User:RitKill|RitKill]] ([[User talk:RitKill|talk]]) 20:20, 11 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::What would be the guidelines-based argument against its inclusion? - [[User:KeithTyler|Keith D. Tyler]] [[User_talk:KeithTyler|¶]] 04:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== This article is pretty useless unless ... == |
|||
Could someone maybe try updating this, so it's not nine years out of date and incomplete (ever heard of the Netherlands?). What's the point of an online encyclopedia if articles like this remain to remind us of the bad old days of paper encyclopedias?! <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.197.170.130|216.197.170.130]] ([[User talk:216.197.170.130#top|talk]]) 21:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
: Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to change it. We encourage you to [[Wikipedia:Be bold|'''be bold''' in updating pages]], because [[wiki]]s like ours develop faster when everybody edits. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. You can always [[Help:Show preview|preview]] your edits before you publish them or test them out in the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you need additional help, check out [[Help:Getting started|our getting started page]] or ask the friendly folks at [[Wikipedia:Teahouse|the Teahouse]]. <!-- Template:Sofixit -->. [[User:KeithTyler|Keith D. Tyler]] [[User_talk:KeithTyler|¶]] 04:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:58, 8 April 2024
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Murray Rothbard[edit]
Apparently the reference to Murray Rothbard is politically motivated, and verges on an advertisement for Libertarian ideologues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.123.140.199 (talk • contribs) 18:07, 27 July 2011
- Are you suggesting the statement is untrue. It is properly sourced. ww2censor (talk) 00:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think it's in doubt whether or not this is an accurate quote, rather the issue is whether it is appropriate to include a single person's opinion in this way. RitKill (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- What would be the guidelines-based argument against its inclusion? - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 04:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it's in doubt whether or not this is an accurate quote, rather the issue is whether it is appropriate to include a single person's opinion in this way. RitKill (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
This article is pretty useless unless ...[edit]
Could someone maybe try updating this, so it's not nine years out of date and incomplete (ever heard of the Netherlands?). What's the point of an online encyclopedia if articles like this remain to remind us of the bad old days of paper encyclopedias?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.197.170.130 (talk) 21:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to change it. We encourage you to be bold in updating pages, because wikis like ours develop faster when everybody edits. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in the sandbox. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at the Teahouse. . Keith D. Tyler ¶ 04:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)