www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Nanjing Massacre: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 88: Line 88:
:Per [[WP:NOTCENSORED]] and [[WP:PROFANE]], no they should not be removed. The images have captions which tie them into the article in an encyclopaedic fashion. [[User:Traumnovelle|Traumnovelle]] ([[User talk:Traumnovelle|talk]]) 22:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
:Per [[WP:NOTCENSORED]] and [[WP:PROFANE]], no they should not be removed. The images have captions which tie them into the article in an encyclopaedic fashion. [[User:Traumnovelle|Traumnovelle]] ([[User talk:Traumnovelle|talk]]) 22:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
::I am not disputing that thei caption is encyclopaedic. I am questioning if they are necessary. As above WP:PROFANE and [[WP:Manual of Style/Images]] states:"Material that would be considered vulgar or obscene by typical Wikipedia readers should be used if and only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, [...]" ... so once again: is it a necessary image to warrent the offensive- and disrepectfulness of the image? Is the article less informative if only the caption remains as normal text or does the reader get more knowledgable by seeing this image? [[User:Nsae Comp|Nsae Comp]] ([[User talk:Nsae Comp|talk]]) 23:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
::I am not disputing that thei caption is encyclopaedic. I am questioning if they are necessary. As above WP:PROFANE and [[WP:Manual of Style/Images]] states:"Material that would be considered vulgar or obscene by typical Wikipedia readers should be used if and only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, [...]" ... so once again: is it a necessary image to warrent the offensive- and disrepectfulness of the image? Is the article less informative if only the caption remains as normal text or does the reader get more knowledgable by seeing this image? [[User:Nsae Comp|Nsae Comp]] ([[User talk:Nsae Comp|talk]]) 23:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
:::The captions make little sense without the image itself, furthermore without images it's easy to say 'okay X wrote about but is there proof'. [[User:Traumnovelle|Traumnovelle]] ([[User talk:Traumnovelle|talk]]) 23:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:37, 24 April 2024

Former good article nomineeNanjing Massacre was a Warfare good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 14, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 13, 2004, December 13, 2005, December 13, 2008, December 13, 2011, December 13, 2012, and December 13, 2014.

Relocation of the capital to where?

The article says the capital was relocated several times, but not to where. Elcalebo (talk) 23:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Nationalist government moved to Chungking. Traumnovelle (talk) 09:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 April 2024

In the section called 'Matsui's reaction to the massacre', I request for where it says "On December 1937, as General Iwane Matsui began to comprehend the full extent of the rape, murder, and looting in the city, he grew increasingly dismayed" to "On December 1937, as General Iwane Matsui began to comprehend the full extent of the rape, torture, murder, and looting in the city, he grew increasingly dismayed" please. 95.147.145.134 (talk) 13:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 14:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 April 2024

I request for where It says "Rape and looting was widespread" to "Rape, torture, and looting was widespread". 95.147.145.134 (talk) 21:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a source that states that torture was widespread? I see sources for widespread rape and looting in the article but not torture. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Ferien (talk) 22:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image of person stabed in their genitals

Hi there everyone! I want to argue that the image of the person stabed in their genitals is unnecessary and does not enough for the article to warrent such an extreme image. I guess its purpose is to depict the extremes of the massacre. As much as I get that I though want to ask if that is necessary? (similarly with some other close images of single corpses, mostly children) Nsae Comp (talk) 22:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NOTCENSORED and WP:PROFANE, no they should not be removed. The images have captions which tie them into the article in an encyclopaedic fashion. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not disputing that thei caption is encyclopaedic. I am questioning if they are necessary. As above WP:PROFANE and WP:Manual of Style/Images states:"Material that would be considered vulgar or obscene by typical Wikipedia readers should be used if and only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, [...]" ... so once again: is it a necessary image to warrent the offensive- and disrepectfulness of the image? Is the article less informative if only the caption remains as normal text or does the reader get more knowledgable by seeing this image? Nsae Comp (talk) 23:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The captions make little sense without the image itself, furthermore without images it's easy to say 'okay X wrote about but is there proof'. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]