Talk:International Classification for Standards: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with 'Is it possible for ISO to generate a classification for organizations, in addition to the classification of standards? My understanding is that classification of o...' |
→Kaprekar number: new section |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is it possible for ISO to generate a classification for organizations, in addition to the classification of standards? My understanding is that classification of organizations and classification of standards are often crossly utilized |
Is it possible for ISO to generate a classification for organizations, in addition to the classification of standards? My understanding is that classification of organizations and classification of standards are often crossly utilized |
||
== Kaprekar number == |
|||
Why is it relevant, in /any/ way, that 999 is a Kaprekar number? And why is it explained that 98 + 1 is 99? Am I missing something here? --[[User:Tunheim|Tunheim]] ([[User talk:Tunheim|talk]]) 19:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:13, 30 May 2008
Is it possible for ISO to generate a classification for organizations, in addition to the classification of standards? My understanding is that classification of organizations and classification of standards are often crossly utilized
Kaprekar number
Why is it relevant, in /any/ way, that 999 is a Kaprekar number? And why is it explained that 98 + 1 is 99? Am I missing something here? --Tunheim (talk) 19:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)