Talk:Hazard analysis and critical control points: Difference between revisions

Food and drink: Foodservice B‑class Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Related taskforces: /  This article is supported by the Foodservice task force (assessed as Top-importance). Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Occupational Safety and Health B‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I agree with Rcharman's comment below. The HACCP graphic does not accurately represent the seven principles, in my opinion. I have a HACCP certification so I consider myself qualified to make that call. I'm going to design a better graphic based on the FSIS/USDA Rule. --FakeSinatra 16:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For having seven principles, why does the HACCP graphic only show six sections? Rcharman 13:08, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me like there should be section on criticisms of the system, safety gaps etc. 24.225.59.8 10:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still, they are basically catching up to a year old system, but they still have a lot of work to do to become competitive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.109.7.89 (talk) 18:51, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We can't say both "ISO 22000 is the new standard bound to replace HACCP" and in the next paragraph "ISO 22000 will not replace HACCP". Someone who knows what the real deal is, please correct this (I'm not qualified myself I'm afraid). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.112.166.103 (talk) 06:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Hazard analysis and critical control points. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041018035508/http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=35496 to http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/basic_profile.cfm?ident_number=35496
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091227115527/http://www.fda.gov:80/Food/FoodSafety/Product-SpecificInformation/AcidifiedLow-AcidCannedFoods/Regulations/default.htm to http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/Product-SpecificInformation/AcidifiedLow-AcidCannedFoods/Regulations/default.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]