www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Rick Alan Ross: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ABCD (talk | contribs)
m Reverted edits by 67.134.82.77 to last version by Zappaz
Zappaz (talk | contribs)
Reverted edits by 67.134.82.77 to last version by ABCD
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
(No difference)

Revision as of 19:51, 22 July 2005

Rick Ross (born November 1952) is a controversial protagonist of the anti-cult movement who maintains a website with an extensive listing of articles about cults, controversial groups, and new religious movements, and related research about mind control theories.

Ross, a former deprogrammer who has no academic credentials, describes himself today as a "cult intervention specialist". He has been interviewed and quoted by the media as a cult expert in the United States and around the world, and he has been called as an expert witness on several occasions.

He has numerous critics, especially from groups listed on his website, and he has played controversial roles in the case of Jason Scott and the ill fated Waco standoff with the Branch Davidians.

Britain's FHM magazine named Rick Ross "America's number one cult buster", the New York Daily News referred to Ross as "Self-styled cult buster" and Time Magazine referred to him as “a veteran cult watcher."

Life

Rick Ross was born in November of 1952 in Cleveland, Ohio into a Jewish family. As a child his family moved to Arizona. His formal education extended through high school, which he completed in 1971.

He was arrested for two non-violent crimes committed in 1974 and 1975. On April 2, 1976, Ross was found guilty of conspiracy, 2nd degree, to commit grand theft, a felony, and was sentenced to four years probation and a fine of $1,100. Maricopa County, Arizona Superior Court vacated judgment and restored Ross' civil rights in 1983.

Ross's involvement with cults started in 1982, when a messianic group infiltrated the Jewish nursing home in Arizona where his grandmother was a resident. Working with the director of the facility and the local Jewish community, Ross managed to stop their involvement. That incident led to further involvement with the Jewish Federation of Greater Phoenix, and an appointment by the Union of American Hebrew Congregations (UAHC) to a national committee focused on cults and interreligious affairs. Ross also represented the Jewish community on the Religious Advisory Committee to the Arizona Department of Corrections and was later elected its chairman. He also served as the chairman of the International Coalition of Jewish Prisoners Programs sponsored by B'nai Brith in Washington D.C. Ross' work within the prison system included inmate religious rights and educational efforts regarding hate groups.

In 1986 Ross left the the Jewish Prisoners Program and became full-time private consultant, lecturer and cult intervention specialist. In the next years he was involved in involuntary deprogramming cases, at the request of the families of the cult members.

Ross wrote an 11-page paper "The missionary threat" in which he describes present-day Christian missionary activities "the greatest missionary threat in history" with which Jews are faced.

In recent year Ross, like much of the anti-cult community after the controversy and court cases against his deprogramming business, no longer advocates involuntary or coercive interventions for adults, preferring instead what he refers to as voluntary "exit counseling". (Note: Ross has no professional accreditation in counseling)

Ross' resume lists lectures at Rutgers University, Penn University of Pennsylvania, Dickinson College, Baylor University, the University of Chicago, Carnegie Mellon University and Arizona State University. He has been a paid consultant for the television networks CBS, CBC and Nippon of Japan and retained as a technical consultant by Miramax/Disney for the Jane Campion film Holy Smoke. He has been qualified and accepted as an expert witness in eight states and has been deposed and/or submitted affidavits as an expert in an additional five states.

In 1996, Ross started a website which is widely cited by the anti-cult movement as a resource for information about controversial groups and movements. The website's FAQ takes care to clarify that not all new religious movements are cults (nor all cults religious), nor all cults necessarily unsafe and/or destructive.

Ross moved to New Jersey in 2001 and two years later he founded the ""Rick A. Ross Institute for the Study of Destructive Cults and Controversial Groups"" a nonprofit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization located in New Jersey. Its stated mission is "public education and research," largely done through Ross's website, although it only declared less than $25,000 income in 2004, as reported by Philantropic Research's GuideStar [1].

On the FAQ of his website, Ross states that the average intervention costs about $5,000.00, excluding payment for testimonies of former members ($500 per day), travel expenses, or if additional research is needed.

Jason Scott case

In 1990, Ross and associates abducted Jason Scott, then an 18-year-old member of the Life Tabernacle Church, affiliated with the United Pentecostal Church International. Scott's mother, Katherine Tonkin, had been a member of the church, but had left due to concerns about the means the church used to keep members in line, their focus on material donations to the church, and a relationship between an elder church member and one of her two minor sons, Jason's younger brothers. After leaving the church herself, and on the suggestion of the Cult Awareness Network (CAN), whom she called, she asked Ross to assist her in the deprogramming of her two minor sons. After speaking with Ross, the two minors chose to leave the church.

Tonkin then made an attempt, again with the help of Ross, to provide a similar intervention for Jason in 1991. This attempt was unsuccessful, and criminal charges were brought against Ross and two others for unlawful imprisonment of Jason during the deprogramming, charges that were filed, dropped, and then re-filed two years later. The trial ended in acquittal for Ross in 1994, but a civil suit was filed in 1995, with long-time counsel for the Church of Scientology Kendrick Moxon representing Jason Scott. The jury in that second trial held Ross liable for conspiracy to deprive Scott of his civil rights of freedom of religion. The suit ended in Ross and the Cult Awareness Network being ordered to pay large judgments:

The jury awarded Jason Scott $875,000 in compensatory damages and punitive damages in the amount of $1,000,000 against CAN, $2,500,000 against deprogrammer Rick Ross, and $250,000 each against Ross’ two accomplices. [2][3]

The large punitive damages awarded were described in the judgement as follows:

“A large award of punitive damages is also necessary under the recidivism and mitigation aspects of the factors cited in Haslip. Specifically, the Court notes that Mr. Ross himself testified that he had acted similarly in the past and would continue to conduct ‘deprogrammings' in the future.”

The suit pushed Ross into bankruptcy, from which he later emerged, and along with over 50 similar suits (most of them brought by Moxon) pushed CAN into bankruptcy, where its name, its logo and its files were considered assets, assets then purchased by the Church of Scientology.

In December 1996, Scott reconciled with his mother and settled with Ross for $5,000, and for 200 hours of Ross's services "as an expert consultant and intervention specialist". Moxon was fired the next day and Scott then retained long-time Church of Scientology opponent Graham Berry as his lawyer instead. Moxon, who had argued in the case that Ross and associates had hindered a competent adult's freedom to make his own religious decisions, immediately filed court papers seeking to appoint a guardian for Scott, whom he called "incapacitated", and rescind the settlement. That effort failed. [4]After deprogramming hundreds of Americans and some Canadians, Ross made news in 1995 when a jury ordered him to pay over two million dollars for the unlawful imprisonement of Jason Scott, during an deprogramming attempt, which resulted in the bankrupting of both Ross and CAN.

Branch Davidians

The role of Ross and the influence he had with the FBA during its dealings with the Branch Davidians is controversial.

Ross claims to have deprogrammed two Branch Davidians prior to the raid at Waco, Texas. He was a major source for a series on the group in the local newpspaper. Prior to the raid the BATF consulted him. During the subsequent standoff he approached the FBI and requested that he be interviewed, which he was.

The Report to the Deputy Attorney General on the Events at Waco, Texas (February 28 to April 19, 1993) states that:

The FBI interviewed Ross only at Ross' request, and politely declined his unsolicited offers of assistance throughout the standoff. The FBI treated the information Ross supplied as it would any other unsolicited information received from the public: it evaluated the credibility of the information and treated it accordingly.

Nancy Ammerman contradicted the FBI's denial that they did not consult Ross and instead insisted they relied on him too much. In her official report to the Justice Department Ammerman wrote:

In late March, Ross recommended that agents attempt to humiliate Koresh, hoping to drive a wedge between him and his followers. While Ross's suggestions may not have been followed to the letter, FBI agents apparently believed that their attempts to embarrass Koresh (talking about his inconsistencies, lack of education, failures as a prophet, and the like) would produce the kind of internal dissension Ross predicted. Because Ross had been successful in using such tactics on isolated and beleaguered members during deprogramming, he must have assumed that they would work en masse. Any student of group psychology could have dispelled that misapprehension. But the FBI was evidently listening more closely to these deprogramming-related strategies than to the counsel of scholars who might have explained the dynamics of a group under siege. [5]

Ammerman claims that the FBI interview transcripts on the Waco tragedy include the note that "[Ross] has a personal hatred for all religious cults" and would aid law enforcement in an attempt to "destroy a cult". Ross denies having talked about destroying a cult.

Carol Moore, author of "The Massacre Of The Branch Davidians A Study Of Government Violations Of Rights, Excessive Force And Cover Up" 1994 [6], writes:

Ross told the Houston Chronicle that Koresh is "your stock cult leader. They're all the same. Meet one and you've met them all. They're deeply disturbed, have a borderline personality and lack any type of conscience. . .No one willingly enters into a relationship like this. So you're talking about deception and manipulation (by the leader), people being coached in ever so slight increments, pulled in deeper and deeper without knowing where it's going or seeing the total picture."

Kimberly Post wrote in 1997:

Relying heavily on reports from a few former members of the Branch Davidians, Marc Breault (a former member and angry apostate) and Rick Ross (a deprogrammer and anti-cultist), Aguilera's affidavit delved into topics not under the jurisdiction of the BATF or part of the initial investigation into firearms violations, such as allegations of child abuse. His affidavit and the assumptions put forth by Breault and Ross decisively influenced the investigation and opinion of Koresh and his followers by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Attorney General Janet Reno, and President Clinton.[7]

Ross recounted his role regarding the Waco Davidian standoff in a letter to Attorney General Janet Reno [8] and responded to critics such as Ammerman in a statement published by the Washington Post. [9]

Catherine Wessinger, Professor of the history of religions and women's studies at the Loyola University in New Orleans, characterizes Ross as a "spurious self-styled expert[s]" in her paper The Branch Davidians and the Waco Media, 1993-2003[10]

Criticism

Ross is criticized for his lack of academic credentials, for a criminal record that predates his cult interest, and for his former deprogramming activities. A great part of the criticism originates from those associated with new religious movements, controversial groups or organizations which are listed in his website, such as the Church of Scientology and the New Kabbalah Movement.

His very critical attitude towards Christian missionary movements brought him in conflict with other protagonists in the anti-cult movement Anton Hein, and Steven Hassan called it a personal attack, that he was at a time listed in the database of Rick Ross.

Scientology

The Church of Scientology, known for no-holds-barred actions against their critics, maintains a 17-page critique about him supplemented by a 196-page document at "Religious Freedom Watch"[11].

Shupe and Darnell

Anson D. Shupe played a controversial role in the Jason Scott process where was one of the witnesses against CAN and got critized by anti-cultists for his deposition, his expertise in the case and his cooperation with Scientology lawyer Kendrick Moxon.

In a paper with Susan Darnell, he levels a critique of self-professed cult experts at Ross. They write that "[...] It is sociologically understandable that deprogrammers came to acquire “spoiled identities” as vigilantes and mercenaries rather than as bonafide counselors or therapists. Their coercive tactics outraged new religious movements (NRMs) and civil libertarian sympathizers and caused many deprogrammers to face legal and criminal complications when (as often happened) their “interventions” did not work. Operatives’ quest to institutionalize themselves as legitimate professionals acting within the law began not long after CAN was founded."[12]

Shuppe and Darnell also assert that Ross engages in anti-Christian rhetoric, referring to a letter to Priscilla Coates, a CAN activist, dated July 30, 1987, in which Ross complained about not getting deprogramming referrals from CAN and that "some parents are so cheap they prefer to let their kids 'bang the bible' than pay."[13] In another letter from Ross to Coates, dated April 28, 1988, Ross describes his strategy to manipulate the media to promote his business as a deprogrammer. He told Coates about his idea to get on television as someone that “had deprogrammed fundamentalist Christians” in order to “stimulate some deprogramming cases in California.”

External links

Waco controversy

Critical websites

References

  1. Shupe, Anson and Darnel, Susan E. - (2003) The Attempted Transformation of a Deviant Occupation into a Therapy: Deprogramming Seeks a New Identity. A paper presented at the 2003 annual meeting of the SSSR/RRA, Norfolk, VA, October 2003. Available online
  2. US Department of Justice, Report to the Deputy Attorney General on the Events at Waco, Texas: Part IV, The Role of Experts During the Standoff, February 28 to April 19, 1993. Available online
  3. Moore, Carol, (1994). Branch Davidians: A study of Government, Violations of Rights and Cover Up,in consultation with Alan Forschler, Ian Goddard, James A. Long, Richard J. Sanford, Timothy Seims and Andrew William. Available online.
  4. Suppe, Anson & Darnell, Susan (2001) Sampler of Deprogramming Cases [14]
  5. Brown, John II, (2005).Jehovah's Witnesses and the Anti-cult Movement: A Human Rights Perspective, CESNUR 2005 International Conference, June 2-5, 2005 – Palermo, Sicily. Available online
  6. Hamerman, Warren A.J. Cult Awareness brainwashers, Executive Intelligence Review V20, #12
  7. Palmer, Susan J. Apostates and their Role in the Construction of Grievance Claims against the Northeast Kingdom/Messianic Communities Avalilable online
  8. Cleveland Jewish News, KABBALAH CENTRE hawks 'snake oil for the soul, July 29, 2004. Available online
  9. Wessinger, Catherine Phd., The Branch Davidians and the Waco Media, 1993-2003, a paper presented at the CESNUR 2004 international conference, Baylor University, Waco (Texas), June 18-20, 2004. Available online
  10. “Interim Report to the Deputy Attorney General Concerning the 1993 Confrontation at the Mt. Carmel Complex Waco Texas” (2000) John C. Danforth, Special Counsel.
  11. “Final Report from John C. Danforth, office of Special Counsel, Waco Investigation,” PRN Newswire November 8, 2000.