Patterson v. Alabama: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
→‎top: add "use mdy dates" template
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case
{{SCOTUSCase |Litigants=Patterson v. Alabama
| Litigants=Patterson v. Alabama
| ArgueDate=January 16
|ArgueDateA=February 15
| ArgueYear=1978
|ArgueDateB=18
| DecideDate=May 30
| ArgueYear=1935
| DecideYear= 1978
| DecideDate=April 1
| DecideYear= 1935
| FullName=Patterson v. Alabama
| FullName=Patterson v. Alabama
| USVol= 436
| USVol= 294
| USPage=412
| USPage=600
| ParallelCitations= 55 S. Ct. 575; 79 [[L. Ed.]] 1082
| Citation= 294 U.S. 600 (1935)
| Prior=''Patterson v. State'', 229 Ala. 270, 156 [[Southern Reporter|So.]] 567 (1934); [[Certiorari|cert]]. granted, {{ussc|293|554|1935|el=no}}.
| Holding= Solicitation of prospective litigants by nonprofit organizations that engage in litigation as a form of political expression and political association constitutes expressive and associational conduct entitled to First Amendment protection.
| Holding= An African-American defendant is denied due process rights if the jury pool excludes African Americans.
| Majority=Powell
| Majority=Hughes
| JoinMajority=Burger, Stewart, Blackmun, White, Stevens
| JoinMajority=Van Devanter, Brandeis, Sutherland, Butler, Stone, Roberts, Cardozo
|Dissent=Rehnquist
| Dissent=
|JoinDissent=
| JoinDissent=

| NotParticipating=Brennen
| NotParticipating=McReynolds
| LawsApplied=[[Constitution of the United States|U.S. Const.]] [[Amendment I|amends. I]], [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|XIV]]
| LawsApplied=14th amendment, 1st amendment
}}
}}
TEXT


'''''Patterson v. Alabama''''', 294 U.S. 600 (1935), was a [[United States Supreme Court]] case which held that an [[African-American]] defendant is denied due process rights if the jury pool excludes African-Americans.
==See also==

* [[Scottsboro Boys ]]
==Background==
* [[Powell v. Alabama]]
This case was the second landmark decision arising out of the [[Scottsboro Boys]] trials (the first was the 1932 case, ''[[Powell v. Alabama]]''). Haywood Patterson, along with several other African-American defendants, were tried for raping two white women in 1931 in [[Scottsboro, Alabama]]. The trials were rushed, there was virtually no legal counsel, and no African-Americans were permitted in the jury. All defendants, including Patterson, were convicted. The [[Communist Party of the United States]] assisted the defendants and appealed to the Supreme Court, which overturned the convictions in 1932 (in the ''[[Powell v. Alabama]]'' decision) due to lack of legal counsel.

A second set of trials was then held in [[Decatur, Alabama]]. In spite of lack of evidence, the jury sentenced Patterson to death in the electric chair. Judge [[James Edwin Horton]] overturned the verdict, and a third trial was held in 1933. The third trial also resulted in a death penalty verdict. No African Americans were included in any of the juries, nor were any ever considered for jury duty in Alabama. This decision was appealed to the Supreme Court, on the basis that the absence of African Americans from the jury pool denied the defendants due process.

The Supreme Court agreed, and the convictions were overturned.

In 1936, the defendants were tried, some for the fourth time, again for rape. In this trial, the verdicts were again guilty, but sentences were long prison terms rather than the death penalty.


==Notes and references==
==Notes and references==
{{clear}}
{{reflist}}
{{reflist|colwidth=30em}}
* <cite id=refPatterson1950>{{cite book
* {{cite book
| last=Patterson | first=Haywood | authorlink=Haywood Patterson
| last1=Patterson | first1=Haywood | author-link=Haywood Patterson
| last2=Conrad | first2=Earl
| last2=Conrad | first2=Earl
| title=Scottsboro boy | publisher=Doubleday| year=1950|isbn=978-1-59740-102-9
| title=Scottsboro boy | publisher=Doubleday| year=1950|isbn=978-1-59740-102-9
| url=http://books.google.com/?id=YOV2AAAAMAAJ&q=Scottsboro+Boy&dq=Scottsboro+Boy&cd=1
| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YOV2AAAAMAAJ&q=Scottsboro+Boy
|ref=refPatterson1950}}
| doi= | id= }}</cite>


==External links==
==External links==
{{wikisource}}
* {{wikisource-inline}}
* {{caselaw source
* {{caselaw source
| case=Patterson v. Alabama - 294 U.S. 600 (1935)
| case=Patterson v. Alabama, {{ussc|294|600|1935|el=no}}
| justia=http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/600/case.html
| justia=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/600/
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep294/usrep294600/usrep294600.pdf
}}
}}
* [http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/587/case.html Norris v. Alabama - 294 U.S. 587 (1935)]

{{Equal protection and criminal procedure|jury|state=expanded}}

[[Category:1935 in United States case law]]
[[Category:1935 in United States case law]]
[[Category:Cases related to the American Civil Liberties Union ]]
[[Category:American Civil Liberties Union litigation]]
[[Category:Civil rights movement case law]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court]]
[[Category:African-American history of Alabama]]
[[Category:1935 in Alabama]]
[[Category:Legal history of Alabama]]
[[Category:United States racial discrimination case law]]

Latest revision as of 02:52, 13 September 2023

Patterson v. Alabama
Argued February 15–18, 1935
Decided April 1, 1935
Full case namePatterson v. Alabama
Citations294 U.S. 600 (more)
55 S. Ct. 575; 79 L. Ed. 1082
Case history
PriorPatterson v. State, 229 Ala. 270, 156 So. 567 (1934); cert. granted, 293 U.S. 554 (1935).
Holding
An African-American defendant is denied due process rights if the jury pool excludes African Americans.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Charles E. Hughes
Associate Justices
Willis Van Devanter · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · George Sutherland
Pierce Butler · Harlan F. Stone
Owen Roberts · Benjamin N. Cardozo
Case opinion
MajorityHughes, joined by Van Devanter, Brandeis, Sutherland, Butler, Stone, Roberts, Cardozo
McReynolds took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV

Patterson v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 600 (1935), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that an African-American defendant is denied due process rights if the jury pool excludes African-Americans.

Background[edit]

This case was the second landmark decision arising out of the Scottsboro Boys trials (the first was the 1932 case, Powell v. Alabama). Haywood Patterson, along with several other African-American defendants, were tried for raping two white women in 1931 in Scottsboro, Alabama. The trials were rushed, there was virtually no legal counsel, and no African-Americans were permitted in the jury. All defendants, including Patterson, were convicted. The Communist Party of the United States assisted the defendants and appealed to the Supreme Court, which overturned the convictions in 1932 (in the Powell v. Alabama decision) due to lack of legal counsel.

A second set of trials was then held in Decatur, Alabama. In spite of lack of evidence, the jury sentenced Patterson to death in the electric chair. Judge James Edwin Horton overturned the verdict, and a third trial was held in 1933. The third trial also resulted in a death penalty verdict. No African Americans were included in any of the juries, nor were any ever considered for jury duty in Alabama. This decision was appealed to the Supreme Court, on the basis that the absence of African Americans from the jury pool denied the defendants due process.

The Supreme Court agreed, and the convictions were overturned.

In 1936, the defendants were tried, some for the fourth time, again for rape. In this trial, the verdicts were again guilty, but sentences were long prison terms rather than the death penalty.

Notes and references[edit]

  • Patterson, Haywood; Conrad, Earl (1950). Scottsboro boy. Doubleday. ISBN 978-1-59740-102-9.

External links[edit]