Journal ranking: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m mv . |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*[[h-index]] – Attempts to measure both the scientific productivity and the apparent scientific impact of an individual scientist. |
*[[h-index]] – Attempts to measure both the scientific productivity and the apparent scientific impact of an individual scientist. |
||
*[[SCImago Journal Rank]] – A measure of scientific influence of scholarly journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from. |
*[[SCImago Journal Rank]] – A measure of scientific influence of scholarly journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from. |
||
*Expert [[survey]] – A score reflecting the overall quality and/or contribution of a journal is based on the results of the survey of active field researchers, practitioners and students (i.e., actual journal contributors and/or readers), who rank each journal based on specific criteria.<ref>Serenko A., Dohan M. , "[http://foba.lakeheadu.ca/serenko/papers/JOI_AI_Journal_Ranking_Serenko.pdf Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of Artificial Intelligence]", Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 629-648, 2011</ref> |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
* [http://www.arc.gov.au/era/default.htm Australian Research Council ranking of journals worldwide] |
* [http://www.arc.gov.au/era/default.htm Australian Research Council ranking of journals worldwide] |
||
* [http://dbh.nsd.uib.no/kanaler/?search=advanced Norwegian ranking of journals worldwide] |
* [http://dbh.nsd.uib.no/kanaler/?search=advanced Norwegian ranking of journals worldwide] |
||
* [http://lamp.infosys.deakin.edu.au/journals/index.php John Lamp’s Index of Information Systems Journals] |
|||
[[Category:Bibliometrics]] |
[[Category:Bibliometrics]] |
||
Revision as of 02:14, 13 October 2011
Journal ranking is widely used in academic circles in the evaluation of an academic journal's impact and quality. Journal rankings are intended to reflect the place of a journal within its field, the relative difficulty of being published in that journal, and the prestige associated with it. They have been recently introduced as official research evaluation tools in some countries such as Norway, Australia and France.[1]
Measures
- Impact factor – Reflecting the average number of citations to articles published in science and social science journals.
- Eigenfactor – A rating of the total importance of a scientific journal according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals.
- h-index – Attempts to measure both the scientific productivity and the apparent scientific impact of an individual scientist.
- SCImago Journal Rank – A measure of scientific influence of scholarly journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from.
- Expert survey – A score reflecting the overall quality and/or contribution of a journal is based on the results of the survey of active field researchers, practitioners and students (i.e., actual journal contributors and/or readers), who rank each journal based on specific criteria.[2]
References
- ^ Pontille D., Torny D. , "The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities", Research Evaluation, 19(5), 347-360, 2010
- ^ Serenko A., Dohan M. , "Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of Artificial Intelligence", Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 629-648, 2011