www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Marriage: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
m Date/fix maintenance tags
Joie de Vivre (talk | contribs)
m "become known as" isn't very accurate, I have never heard anyone known as "Wife" or as "Husband"; because those words are ''terms'' used to ''describe'' people, not names for them.
Line 8: Line 8:
'''Marriage'''
'''Marriage'''
is a [[government|governmentally]], [[society|societally]], or [[religion|religiously]] recognized [[interpersonal relationship]], usually [[Intimacy|intimate]] and [[Human sexual behavior|sexual]], and often created as a [[contract]].
is a [[government|governmentally]], [[society|societally]], or [[religion|religiously]] recognized [[interpersonal relationship]], usually [[Intimacy|intimate]] and [[Human sexual behavior|sexual]], and often created as a [[contract]].
The most frequent form of marriage is between a man and a woman, who become known as [[husband]] and [[wife]].<ref> {{cite web |url= http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20040524-103201-1169r.htm
The most frequently occuring form of marriage is between a woman and a man, where the feminine term ''[[wife]]'' and the masculine ''[[husband]]'' may be used to describe them.<ref> {{cite web |url= http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20040524-103201-1169r.htm
| title= Dictionaries Take Lead in Redefining Modern Marriage |accessdate=2007-02-03 |publisher = Washington Times |format= |work= }}</ref><ref>[http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/marriage | Merriam-Webster definition].</ref> Other forms of marriage also exist. [[Polygamy]], in which a person takes more than one spouse, is present in many societies' traditions.<ref name=Murdoch>
| title= Dictionaries Take Lead in Redefining Modern Marriage |accessdate=2007-02-03 |publisher = Washington Times |format= |work= }}</ref><ref>[http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/marriage | Merriam-Webster definition].</ref> Other forms of marriage also exist. [[Polygamy]], in which a person takes more than one spouse, is present in many societies' traditions.<ref name=Murdoch>
{{cite book
{{cite book

Revision as of 19:14, 14 February 2007

Template:Totally disputed


Marriage is a governmentally, societally, or religiously recognized interpersonal relationship, usually intimate and sexual, and often created as a contract. The most frequently occuring form of marriage is between a woman and a man, where the feminine term wife and the masculine husband may be used to describe them.[1][2] Other forms of marriage also exist. Polygamy, in which a person takes more than one spouse, is present in many societies' traditions.[3] The institution of marriage has also, from 2001, been expanded to include same-sex marriage in some areas. Civil unions are another, separate form of legal union open to couples of the same sex, with wider acceptance currently than same-sex marraige. Like marriages, civil unions are performed and recognized by some religious denominations.

The act of marriage often creates obligations between the individuals involved, and in many societies their extended families [citation needed]. The reasons people marry vary widely, usually including: the public declaration of love, the formation of a family unit, legitimizing sexual relations and procreation, social and economic stability, and the education and development of offspring.[4][5]

A marriage can be declared by a wedding ceremony,[6] which may be performed either by a religious officiator or through a similar government-sanctioned secular process. Marriages are perpetual agreements with legal consequences, terminated only by the death of one party or by formal dissolution processes such as divorce and annulment.

Definitions throughout history

A medieval woodcut of a marriage from Holland

Marriage of some kind is found in virtually every society. Except in societies where post-marital residence is traditionally matrilocal, patrilocal, or avunculocal, married people typically form a household, which is most often subsequently extended biologically, through children. In the West the nuclear family emerged during the late medieval period.[7] Most non-Western societies have a broader definition of family that includes an extended family network.

One universal and unique attribute of marriage is the creation of affinal ties (in-laws). [citation needed]

Marriage remains important as the bond that socially sanctions a sexual relationship. Children born outside of marriage have been legally known as illegitimate, or bastards. This has also applied to children who were born inside a marriage, which was then annulled, as in the case of the two daughters of Henry VIII, Mary I and Elizabeth I, who were declared illegitimate after their father annulled the marriages that they had been born into.

Historically, many societies have allowed some form of polygamy. Europe, the United States and Canada have, for the most part, defined themselves as monogamous cultures. This partially stemmed from Germanic cultural traditions, Christianity, and mandate of the Roman Law. However, Roman Law permitted prostitution, concubinage, and sexual access to slaves. The Christian West formally banned these practices with laws against adultery, fornication and other relationships outside a monogamous lifelong covenant.

Marriage was a civil institution in nations until about the mid 5th century AD.[citation needed] Around that time, Augustine and others philosophized about marriage and the Christian Church started taking an interest in co-opting it.[citation needed] Christians began to have their marriages conducted by ministers in Christian gatherings. It was in the 12th century that the Roman Catholic Church, as well as other orthodoxies, formally defined marriage as a sacrament. In Roman Catholicism, the Sacrament of Matrimony is between God, the man and the woman.[8] The Protestant Reformation reformulated marriage as a life-long covenant; Protestant leaders like Martin Luther and Calvin denied that marriage was a sacrament.

Recognition

File:Jpmullins.jpg
A justice of the peace presides over a civil marriage ceremony by a lake in Connecticut.

The participants in a marriage usually seek social recognition for their relationship, and many societies require official approval of a religious or civil body. Sociologists thus distinguish between a marriage ceremony (wedding) conducted under the auspices of a religion and a state-authorized civil marriage.[citation needed]

In the Protestant tradition, Calvin and his colleagues reformulated marriage through enactment of The Marriage Ordinance of Geneva imposing, "The dual requirements of state registration and church consecration to constitute marriage."[9]

In England and Wales it was Lord Hardwicke's Marriage Act that first required formal ceremony of marriage, thereby curtailing the practice of Fleet Marriage.

In many jurisdictions the civil marriage ceremony may take place during the religious marriage ceremony, although they are theoretically distinct. In most American states, the marriage may be officiated by a Priest, Minister, Rabbi or other religious authority, and in such a case the religious authority acts simultaneously as an agent of the state. In some countries such as France, Spain, Germany, Turkey, Argentina and Russia, it is necessary to be married by the state before having a religious ceremony. Some states allow civil marriages in circumstances which are not allowed by many religions, such as same-sex marriages or civil unions, and marriage may also be created by the operation of the law alone as in common-law marriage, which is a judicial recognition that two people living as domestic partners are entitled to the effects of marriage. Conversely, there are examples of people who have a religious ceremony that is not recognized by the civil authorities. Examples include widows who stand to lose a pension if they remarry and so undergo a marriage only in the eyes of God and the community, homosexual couples (where same-sex marriage is not legally recognized), some sects which recognize polygamy, retired couples who would lose pension benefits if legally married, Muslim men who wish to engage in polygamy that is condoned in some situations under Islam, and immigrants who do not wish to alert the immigration authorities that they are married either to a spouse they are leaving behind or because the complexity of immigration laws may make it difficult for spouses to visit on a tourist visa.

In Europe it has traditionally been the churches' office to make marriages official by registering them. Hence, it was a significant step towards a clear separation of church and state and also an intended and sufficient weakening of the Christian churches' role in Germany, when Chancellor Otto von Bismarck introduced the Zivilehe (civil marriage) in 1875. This law made the declaration of the marriage before an official clerk of the civil administration (both spouses affirming their will to marry) the procedure to make a marriage legally valid and effective, and reduced the clerical marriage to a private ceremony.

Rights and obligations

A Ketubah in Aramaic, a Jewish marriage-contract outlining the duties of each partner.

Marriage sometimes establishes the legal father of a woman's child; establishes the legal mother of a man's child; gives the husband or his family control over the wife's sexual services, labor, and/or property; gives the wife or her family control over the husband's sexual services, labor, and/or property; establishes a joint fund of property for the benefit of children; establishes a relationship between the families of the husband and wife. No society does all of these; no one of these is universal (see Edmund Leach's article in "Marriage, Family, and Residence," edited by Paul Bohannan and John Middleton).

Marriage is not a prerequisite for having children. In the U.S., the National Center for Health Statistics reported that in 1992 30.1 percent of births were to unmarried women.[10][11] Some married couples remain childless by choice or due to infertility, age, or other factors preventing reproduction. In some cultures marriage imposes upon women the obligation to bear children. In northern Ghana, for example, payment of bridewealth signifies a woman's requirement to bear children, and women using birth control face substantial threats of physical abuse and reprisals.[12]

Most of the world's major religions tell couples they should marry before having sexual intercourse.[13] They teach that unmarried people should not have sex, which they refer to as fornication. Fornication is sometimes socially discouraged or even criminalized. Sex with a married person other than one's spouse, called adultery, is universally condemned by all major world religions, and has often been criminalized. It is against the governing law of the U.S. military. Nevertheless, three recent studies in the U.S. using nationally representative samples have found that about 10-15% of women and 20-25% of men engage in extramarital sex.[14] [15][16].

Conversely, a marriage is commonly held to require a sexual relationship, and non-consummation (that is, failure to engage in sex) may be held grounds for an annulment (as for instance John Ruskin's abortive marriage).

Polygamy

Polygamous marriage, in which a person takes more than one spouse, is accepted in a majority of global social traditions, though it is far less common than monogamy.[3] Africa has the highest rate of polygamy in the world.[17] In Senegal, for example, nearly 47 percent of marriages are multiple.[18] Polygyny is the typical form of polygamy, while polyandry is rare.[19] Anthropologists distinguish between these forms of multiple marriage, where one person separately marries more than one spouse, and group marriage, in which multiple spouses all become married to one another. The group marriage form of polygamy is rare.[3] In the U.S. the historic Oneida Colony provides a prominent 19th century example of a polygamous group marriage.

Marriage restrictions

Many present-day societies, even those with a cultural tradition of polygamy, recognize monogamy as the only valid form of marriage. For example, China shifted from allowing polygamy to supporting only monogamy in the Marriage Act of 1953 after the Communist revolution. Polygamy is practiced illegally by some groups in the United States and Canada, primarily by Mormon fundamentalists sects that separated from the mainstream Latter Day Saints movement after the practice was renounced in 1890. While many peoples in African and Islamic societies do allow polygyny (around 2.0 billion people), perhaps less than 3% of all Muslim marriages are polygynous.[citation needed]

Since the later decades of the 20th century, many ideas about the nature and purpose of marriage and family have been challenged in some countries, in particular by LGBT social movements, which argue that marriage should not be exclusively heterosexual. Some people also argue that marriage may be an unnecessary legal fiction.[citation needed] This follows from an overall shift in Western ideas and practices of family; since WWII, the West has seen a dramatic increase in divorce (6% to over 40% of first marriages), cohabitation without marriage, a growing unmarried population, children born outside of marriage (5% to over 33% of births), and an increase in adultery (8% to over 40%)[citation needed]. A de facto system of serial monogamy has emerged. On the other hand, demands for same-sex marriage have led to its legalization in some Western countries.

Today, the term marriage is generally reserved for a union that is formally recognized by the state (although some people disagree). The phrase legally married can be used to emphasize this point. In the United States there are two methods of receiving state recognition of a marriage: common law marriage and obtaining a marriage license. The majority of US states do not recognize common law marriage. Many localities do support various types of domestic partnerships.

Many countries regulate the age at which one can get married. Societies have always placed restrictions on marriage to relatives, though the degree of prohibited relationship varies widely. In almost all societies, marriage between brothers and sisters is forbidden, with Ancient Egyptian, Hawaiian, and Inca royalty being the rare exceptions. In many societies, marriage between some first cousins is preferred, while at the other extreme, the medieval Catholic church prohibited marriage even between distant cousins. The present day Catholic Church still maintains a standard of required distance (in both consanguinity and affinity) for marriage.

In the Indian Hindu community, especially in the Brahmin caste, marrying a person of the same Gotra was prohibited, since persons belonging to the same Gotra are said to have identical patrilineal descent. In ancient India when Gurukul was in existence, the shishyas (the pupils) were advised against marrying any of Guru's children, as shishyas were considered Guru's children and it would be considered marriage among siblings. However, there were exceptions, including Arjuna's son Abhimanyu's marriage to Uttra, the dance student of Arjuna in Mahabharata. The Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, brought reforms in the area of same gotra marriages. Before this act, the Indian constitution banned same gotra marriages. Now the Indian constitution guarantees any two consenting adults (women 18 or older and men 21 or older) from any race, religion, caste or creed to engage in the institution of marriage.

Many societies have also adopted other restrictions on whom one can marry, such as prohibitions on marrying persons with the same surname, or persons with the same sacred animal. One example is South Korea. Even today, it is generally considered taboo for a man to marry a woman if they both have the same family name. The most common surname in South Korea is "Kim" (almost 20%); however, there are several branches (or clans) in the "Kim" surname. (Korean family names are divided into one or more clans.) Only intra-clan marriages are prohibited, as they are considered one type of exogamy. Thus, many "Kim-Kim" couples can be found.

Anthropologists refer to these sorts of restrictions as exogamy. One exception to this pattern is in ancient Egypt, where marriage between brothers and sisters was permitted in the royal family — as it was also permitted in Hawaii and among the Inca. This privilege was denied commoners and may have served to concentrate wealth and power in one family.[citation needed] The consequence of the incest-taboo is exogamy, the requirement to marry someone from another group. Anthropologists have thus pointed out that the incest taboo may serve to promote social solidarity.

Societies have also at times required marriage from within a certain group. Anthropologists refer to these restrictions as endogamy. An example of such restrictions would be a requirement to marry someone from the same tribe. Racist laws adopted by some societies in the past, such as Nazi-era Germany, apartheid-era South Africa and most of the United States in the first half of the 20th century, which prohibited marriage between persons of different races, could also be considered examples of endogamy. In the U.S., these laws were largely repealed between 1940 and 1960. The U.S. Supreme Court declared all such laws unconstitutional in the case of Loving v. Virginia in 1967.

Cultures that practiced slavery might admit that slave marriages formed but grant them no legal status. This was the practice under the Roman empire, so that in the Acts of Perpetua and Felicitas, the freewoman Perpetua could be described as "a married matron" but Felicitas as the "fellow-servant" of Revocatus — even though the Christians regarded, religiously, such marriages as binding. Likewise, slave marriages in the United States were not binding, so that many contrabands escaping slavery during the American Civil War sought official status for their marriages. Among the rights distinguishing serfdom from slavery was the right to enter a legally recognizable marriage.

Weddings

Couple married in a Shinto ceremony in Takayama, Gifu prefecture (Jim Maes).

A marriage may be celebrated with a wedding ceremony,[20] which may be performed by a religious officiator or through a similar government-sanctioned secular process. Despite the ceremony being led by somone else, most religious traditions maintain that the marriage itself is mediated between the two individuals themselves using vows, with the gathered witnessing, affirming, and legitimizing the marriage. Marriages are perpetual agreements with legal consequences, terminated only by the death of one party or by formal dissolution processes such as divorce and annulment.

The ceremony in which a marriage is enacted and announced to the community is called a wedding. A wedding in which the participants marry in the "eyes of the law" is called a civil marriage. Religions also facilitate weddings, in the "eyes of God". In many European and some Latin American countries, when someone chooses a religious ceremony, they must hold that ceremony separate from the civil ceremony. Certain countries, like Belgium, Bulgaria and the Netherlands, demand that the civil marriage take place before any religious marriage. In some countries — notably the United States, the United Kingdom, the Republic of Ireland, Norway and Spain — both ceremonies can be held together; the officiant at the religious and community ceremony also serving as an agent of the state to enact the civil marriage. That does not mean that the state is "recognizing" religious marriages — the "civil" ceremony just takes place at the same time as the religious ceremony. Often this involves simply signing a register during the religious ceremony. If that civil element of the full ceremony is left out for any reason, in the eyes of the law no marriage took place, irrespective of the holding of the religious ceremony.

While some countries, such as Australia, permit marriages to be held in private and at any location, others, including England, require that the civil ceremony be conducted in a place specially sanctioned by law (i.e., a church or registry office), and be open to the public. An exception can be made in the case of marriage by special emergency license, which is normally granted only when one of the parties is terminally ill. Rules about where and when persons can marry vary from place to place. Some regulations require that one of the parties reside in the locality of the registry office. Because of Australia's very relaxed rules on marriage, some celebrities (such as Michael Jackson) have opted to marry in Australia, so as to have a private ceremony.

The way in which a marriage is enacted has changed over time, as has the institution of marriage itself. In Europe during the Middle Ages, marriage was enacted by the couple promising verbally to each other that they would be married to each other; the presence of a priest or other witnesses was not required. This promise was known as the "verbum". If made in the present tense (e.g. "I marry you"), it was unquestionably binding; if made in the future tense ("I will marry you"), it would, by itself constitute a betrothal, but if the couple proceeded to have sexual relations, the union was a marriage. As part of the Reformation, the role of recording marriages and setting the rules for marriage passed to the state; by the 1600s many of the Protestant European countries had heavy state involvement in marriage. As part of the Counter-Reformation, the Catholic Church added a requirement of witnesses to the promise, which under normal circumstances had to include the priest.

Marriage and religion

A Muslim couple being wed alongside the Tungabhadra River at Kampi, India.

Many religions have extensive teachings regarding marriage. Most Christian churches give some form of blessing to a marriage; the wedding ceremony typically includes some sort of pledge by the community to support the couple's relationship. Religious communities widely hold marriage as a relationship uniquely allegorical to God's relationship with "His people;" the husband representing God and the bride representing the whole of God's chosen people.

Liturgical Christian communions, notably Anglicanism, Catholicism, and Orthodoxy, consider marriage (sometimes termed holy matrimony) to be an expression of grace, termed a sacrament or mystery. In Western ritual, the sacrament is bestowed upon a husband and wife by the spouses themselves as ministers, with a bishop, priest or deacon normally witnessing the union on behalf of the church. In Eastern ritual churches, the clergyman functions as the minister. Western Christians commonly term marriage a vocation, while Eastern Christians term it an ordination and a martyrdom, though the theological emphases indicated by the various appellations are not excluded by the catechetical teachings of either tradition. Marriage is commonly celebrated in the context of a Eucharistic service (a nuptial Mass or Divine Liturgy). The sacrament of marriage is iconic of the relationship between Christ and the Church. While most Reformed Christians would deny the elevation of marriage to the status of a sacrament, nonetheless it is considered a covenant between spouses before God.

In Judaism, marriage is viewed as a contractual bond commanded by God in which a man and a woman come together to create a relationship, in which God is directly involved.[21] Though procreation is not the sole purpose, Jewish marriage is also expected to fulfill the commandment to have children.[22] The main focus centers around the relationship between the husband and wife. Kabbalistically, marriage is understood to mean that the husband and wife are merging together into a single soul. This is why a man is considered "incomplete" if he is not married as his soul is only one part of a larger whole that remains to be unified.

Islam also recommends marriage highly; among other things, it helps in the pursuit of spiritual perfection. The Bahá'í Faith sees marriage as a foundation of the structure of society, and considers it both a physical and spiritual bond that endures into the afterlife. Buddhism does not encourage or discourage marriage, although it does teach how one might live a happily married life.

Hinduism sees marriage as a sacred duty that entails both religious and social obligations. Old Hinduism literature in Sanskrit gives many different types of marriages and their categorization ranging from "Gandharva Vivaha" (instant marriage by mutual consent of participants only, without any need for even a single third person as witness) to normal (present day) marriages, to "Rakshasa Vivaha" (marriage performed by abduction of one participant by the other participant, usually, but not always, with the help of other persons). There are elaborate laws in Manusmriti sacred book directing which castes and which varnas can marry which castes, and the penalties for breaking these nuptial laws.

For the most part, religious traditions in the world reserve marriage to heterosexual unions but there are exceptions including Unitarian Universalist and Metropolitan Community Church.[23]

Marriage and cohabitation

Marriage is an institution which can join together people's lives in emotional and economic ways. Marriage can also lead to the formation of a new household, but among some people (e.g. the Minangkabau of West Sumatra) residency after marriage is matrilocal, with the husband moving into the pre-existing household of his wife's mother.[24]

In many Western cultures, married people usually live together in the same home, often sharing the same bed, but in some other regions this is not the tradition.[25] In southwestern China, for example, walking marriages, in which the husband and wife do not live together, have been a traditional part of the Mosuo culture.[26] Walking marriages have also been increasingly common in modern Beijing. Guo Jianmei, director of the center for women's studies at Beijing University, told a Newsday correspondent, "Walking marriages reflect sweeping changes in Chinese society."[27] A similar arrangement in Saudi Arabia, called misyar marriage, also involves the husband and wife living separately but meeting regularly.[28]

Conversely, marriage is not a prerequisite for cohabitation. In one study, Jay Teachman, a researcher at Western Washington University, studied premarital cohabitation of women who are in a monogamous relationship.[29] Teachman’s study showed "women who are committed to one relationship, who have both premarital sex and cohabit only with the man they eventually marry, have no higher incidence of divorce than women who abstain from premarital sex and cohabitation. For women in this category, premarital sex and cohabitation with their eventual husband are just two more steps in developing a committed, long-term relationship."[30]

Marriage and economics

The economics of marriage have changed over time. Historically, in many cultures the family of the bride had to provide a dowry to pay a man for marrying their daughter (in Early Modern Britain, the social status of the couple was supposed to be equal; also, after the marriage, the entire property (called "fortune") and expected inheritances of the wife belonged only to her husband, a frequent subject in Early Modern British literature; she was often called "his property", which did then include the protection a single woman did not have). In other cultures, the family of the groom had to pay a bride price to the bride's family for the right to marry the daughter. In some cultures, dowries and bride prices are still demanded today. In both cases, the financial transaction takes place between the groom (or his family) and the bride's family; the bride has no part in the transaction and often no choice in whether to participate in the marriage.

In some cultures, dowries were not unconditional gifts; if the groom had other children, they could not inherit the dowry, which had to go to the bride's children, and which, in the event of her childlessness, had to return to her family -- sometimes not until the groom's death, or his remarriage; often the bride was entitled to inherit at least as much as her dowry from her husband's estate.

Morning gifts, which might also be arranged by the bride's father rather than the bride, were given to the bride herself; the name derives from the Germanic tribal custom of giving them the morning after the wedding night. She might or might not have control of this morning gift during the lifetime of her husband, but is entitled to it when widowed. If the amount of her inheritance is settled by law rather than agreement, it may be called dower. Depending on legal systems and the exact arrangement, she may not be entitled to dispose of it after her death, and may lose the property if she remarries. Morning gifts were preserved for many centuries in morganatic marriage, a union where the wife's inferior social status was held to prohibit her children from inheriting a noble's titles or estates. The morning gift would be to support the wife and children. Another legal provision for widowhood was jointure, in which property, often land, would be held in joint tenancy, so that it would automatically go to the widow on her husband's death.

In many modern legal systems, two people who marry have the choice between keeping their property separate or combining their property. In the latter case, called community property, when the marriage ends by divorce each owns half; if one partner dies the surviving partner owns half and for the other half inheritance rules apply. In many legal jurisdictions, laws related to property and inheritance, provide by default for property to pass upon the death of one party in a marriage to the spouse first and secondarily to the children. Wills and trusts can be recorded to make alternative provisions for property succession.

In some legal systems, the partners in a marriage are "jointly liable" for the debts of the marriage. This has a basis in a traditional legal notion called the "Doctrine of Necessities" whereby a husband was responsible to provide necessary things for his wife. Where this is the case, one partner may be sued to collect a debt for which they did not expressly contract. Critics of this practice note that debt collection agencies can abuse this claiming an unreasonably wide range of debts to be expenses of the marriage. The cost of defence and the burden of proof is then placed on the non-contracting party to prove that the expense is not a debt of the family.

The respective maintenance obligations, during and eventually after a marriage, are regulated in most jurisdictions; see alimony.

Some have attempted to analyse the institution of marriage using economic theory; for example, anarcho-capitalist economist David Friedman has written a lengthy and controversial study of marriage as a market transaction (the market for husbands and wives).[31]

In most countries, the tax-rate structure is progressive, that is, a higher income pays a higher rate of tax. In such a context income averaging is advantageous to the taxpayer. Married couples normally combine their income which, when the spouses' monetary incomes are disparate, affords them the advantage of this income averaging. To compensate for this somewhat, many countries with progressive taxes enact higher tax rates on that averaged income (married couples in such jurisdictions pay more than twice the tax of a single person making half of the income). So couples with disparate incomes (which is the case for a stay-at-home spouse married to a "breadwinner") will gain a tax advantage from the income averaging. However married couples having roughly equal personal incomes gain nothing from such income averaging yet remain subject to the higher tax bracket (for married filing jointly) and thus pay more total tax than they would as two single persons. This is commonly called the marriage penalty in the tax laws.

Moreover, when the rates applied by the tax code are not based on averaging the incomes, but rather on the sum of individuals' incomes, higher rates will definitely apply for two-earner households in progressive tax systems. This is most often the case with high-income taxpayers and is another situation where some consider there to be a marriage penalty.

In some cultures, women are expected to marry a spouse more powerful economically, socially, or politically. Known as hypergyny, this practice is common in India.[citation needed] Though an expected social norm in America, hypergyny is slowly being replaced by Isogamy, marriage between equals, and the marrying 'down' of woman.[citation needed] Many anthropologists ascribe this to increased gender equality between women and men.[citation needed]

Arranged marriage

An arranged marriage between Louis XIV of France and Maria Theresa of Spain

A pragmatic (or 'arranged') marriage that is facilitated by formal procedures of family or group politics. A responsible authority sets up or encourages the marriage; they may, indeed, engage a professional matchmaker to find a suitable spouse for an unmarried person. The authority could be parents, family, a religious figure or a consensus. The former two often start the process with informal pressure, social pressure, whilst the latter two often start the process with a formal system or statement. In both cases, the authority has a compelling veto over the marriage, and this system is socially supported by the rest of community so that to deny it is extreme and drastic. Once declared, an engagement is implicit, which follows through with a formal marriage ceremony.[citation needed]

Arranged and 'pragmatic' marriages are typical of dowry-based inheritance systems. Women in these societies inherit male wealth at the time of marriage, causing the parents to have a particular interest in their daughters' marriages. These same societies demanded pre-marital chastity and kept a high degree of separation of the sexes until marriage.[citation needed]

Though now a rarity in Western countries, where people find their partner, in countries such as India, arranged marriages are widely prevalent even today. In villages marriage of a child has a lot to do with family property, parents adopt practices of child marriages and arrange the wedding sometimes even before the child is born (though made illegal by Child Marriage Restraint Act of the Indian Government). In Urban India, people take help of thriving institutions known as Marriage Bureaus, where candidates register themselves with their profile at a set fee.

A diluted/moderate version of arranged marriages are widely prevalent, specially in Urban areas, where parents suggest a possible candidate with the intention of marriage preceded by significant period of courtship. This practice creates less social pressure from the stringent practices adopted in the villages.

A related form of pragmatic marriage, sometimes called a marriage of convenience, involves immigration laws. According to one publisher of information about "green card" marriages, "Every year over 450,000 thousand United States citizens marry foreign-born individuals and petition for them to obtain a permanent residency (Green Card) in the United States."[32] While this is likely an over-estimate, in 2003 alone 184,741 immigrants were admitted to the U.S. as spouses of U.S. citizens.[33]

Popular culture often associates Love and Marriage. But a U.S. senator has written that doing so harms the the institution of marriage. "If marriage begins to be viewed as the way two adults make known their love for each other, there is no reason to marry before children are born rather than after. And if it is immaterial whether a couple should be married before the birth of a child, then why should they marry at all?"[34]

Same-sex marriage

Main article: Same-sex marriage

From 2001, five nations have made same-sex marriage legal, including the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, and South Africa. Israel recognizes same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions. In the United States, Massachusetts is the only state to recognize same-sex marriage under the name marriage. Civil unions are a separate form of legal union open to couples of the same sex, and they are currently recognized in only 24 out of 193 countries worldwide and some U.S. states. Many U.S. states have adopted referendums or laws that generally restrict marriage recognition to heterosexual couples. Federally, the U.S. Senate has considered, and failed to pass, a Federal Marriage Amendment.

Marriages between same-sex partners are rare or nonexistent in most societies. Civil unions, however, are recognized and accepted in approximately 30 countries. Same-sex unions have also been recorded in the history of pre-modern Europe.[35] Same-sex marriage remains statistically insignificant worldwide, as it is not legally recognized in most countries. However, in countries where it has been adopted, applications for marriage licenses have far exceeded governmental estimates of demand.[36] As homosexuality has become more accepted in Western cultures, more governments are allowing and/or sanctioning marriage of same-sex couples.

These developments have created a political and religious reaction in some countries, most notably in the United Kingdom, where the Church of England, after long debate, officially banned blessings of gay couples by Church of England clergy[37], and in the United States, where several states have specifically defined marriage as between a man and a woman, often by popular referenda[citation needed]. The state of Mississippi passed a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman and refusing to recognize same sex marriages from other states. [2] The measure passed with 86% of the vote, the highest percentage seen on a statewide level[citation needed]. Conversely, several states have sanctioned some form of same-sex unions, such as California and Massachusetts. In addition, Lutheran churches in Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden and some Lutheran churches of the Evangelical Church in Germany allow blessing ceremonies for same-sex couples. In other countries (such as Finland) such ceremonies are discouraged and rarely performed by the church.[citation needed]

Termination

In most societies, the death of one of the partners terminates the marriage, and in monogamous societies this allows the other partner to remarry. A spouse who outlives the other is referred to as a widow (female) or widower (male). Many societies also provide for the termination of marriage through divorce. Marriages can also be annulled: canceled through a proceeding that establishes that a marriage was invalid from its beginning.

Several cultures have practiced temporary and conditional marriages. Examples include the Celtic practice of handfasting and fixed-term marriages in the Muslim community. Pre-Islamic Arabs practiced a form of temporary marriage that carries on today in the practice of Nikah Mut'ah, a fixed-term marriage contract. Muslim controversies related to Nikah Mut'ah have resulted in the practice being confined mostly to Shi'ite communities.

Criticisms of the institution of marriage

Some commentators have been critical of marriage, sometimes condemning individual local practices and sometimes even the entire institution. A good many of the criticisms are developed from a feminist viewpoint that claims marriage can be particularly disadvantageous to women. However, there are other viewpoints from which marriage in its usual forms is problematic. Father's Rights advocates claim that no fault divorce and a family courts bias toward giving women custody of children encourages divorce. Criticisms from same-sex rights movements of the institution focus on its general exclusion of homosexuals, likening this to old prohibitions on cross racial marriages.[citation needed]

See also

Types

Lists and statistics

File:Maritalstatus.jpg
Marital Status in the U.S.

Related concepts

References

  1. ^ "Dictionaries Take Lead in Redefining Modern Marriage". Washington Times. Retrieved 2007-02-03.
  2. ^ | Merriam-Webster definition.
  3. ^ a b c Murdock, George Peter (1949). Social Structure. New York: The MacMillan Company. ISBN 0-02-922290-7. See also: Kaingang.
  4. ^ Krier, James E. (2006). Property. Aspen Publishers. ISBN 0735557926. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) Excerpt - page 335: '... at the wedding; hence the importance of including in the marriage ceremony the words, "With all my worldly goods I thee endow." ...'
  5. ^ GALLAGHER, MAGGIE (2002). "What is Marriage For? The Public Purposes of Marriage Law" (PDF). LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW. Retrieved 2007-01-08.
  6. ^ Eleanor, Schick (1999). Navajo Wedding Day: A Dine Marriage Ceremony. Cavendish Children's Books. ISBN 0761450319.
  7. ^ Greif, Avner (2005). "Family Structure, Institutions, and Growth: The Origin and Implications of Western Corporatism"
  8. ^ The Catholic 1992 Catechism on Matrimony. Retrieved February 4, 2007
  9. ^ Witte Jr., John (1997). From Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western Tradition. Westminster John Knox Press. pp. page 91. ISBN 0664255434. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  10. ^ Jones, Richard E. (2006). Human Reproductive Biology, Third Edition. Academic Press. ISBN 0120884658. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  11. ^ Ventura, SJ. (1995). Births to unmarried mothers: United States, 1980–92 (PDF). National Center for Health Statistics. ISBN 0-8406-0507-2.
  12. ^ Bawah, AA. (1999). "Women's fears and men's anxieties: the impact of family planning on gender relations in northern Ghana" (PDF). Studies in Family Planning. 30 (1). Population Council: 54–66. ISSN: 0039-3665. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  13. ^ Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance (December 31, 2006), [http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_sex.htm HUMAN SEXUALITY AND GENDER TOPICS: Subjects of major concern to many faith groups], Religioustolerance.org. Retrieved February 4, 2007.
  14. ^ Clements, M. (1994, August 7). Sex in America today: A new national survey reveals how our attitudes are changing. Parade Magazine, 4-6.
  15. ^ Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T, & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  16. ^ Wiederman, M. W. (1997). Extramarital sex: Prevalence and correlates in a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 167-174.
  17. ^ http://www.southerncenter.org/af_jan07_lesson5.pdf
  18. ^ Diouf, Nafi (May 2, 2004). "Polygamy hangs on in Africa". The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
  19. ^ Schwimmer, Brian. (2003). Polygamy. Kinship and Social Organization. http://www.umanitoba.ca/anthropology/tutor/marriage/polygamy.html.
  20. ^ Eleanor, Schick (1999). Navajo Wedding Day: A Dine Marriage Ceremony. Cavendish Children's Books. ISBN 0761450319.
  21. ^ (Deuteronomy 24:1)
  22. ^ (Genesis 1:28)
  23. ^ "World Religions and Same Sex Marriage", Marriage Law Project, Columbus School of Law at The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, July 2002 revision [1]
  24. ^ Sanday, Peggy Reeves (2002). Women at the center : life in a modern matriarchy. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-8906-7.
  25. ^ Rosenblatt, Paul C. (2006). Two in a Bed: The Social System of Couple Bed Sharing. State University of New York Press. ISBN 0-7914-6829-1.
  26. ^ Lu, Yuan (Nov, 2000). "Land Of The Walking Marriage - Mosuo people of China". Natural History. American Museum of Natural History. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  27. ^ Gargan, Edward A. (2001-03-19). "China's New Brides Put Freedom First / All perks, no work in 'walking marriages'". Newsday. pp. A.04. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  28. ^ Karam, Souhail (July 21, 2006). "Misyar offers marriage-lite in strict Saudi society". Reuters.
  29. ^ Jay Teachman (2003), Premarital Sex, Premarital Cohabitation, and the Risk of Subsequent Marital Dissolution Among Women, Journal of Marriage and Family 65 (2), 444–455.
  30. ^ "Premarital Sex, Cohabitation, and Divorce: the Broken Link" (PDF) (Press release). National Council on Family Relations. 2003.
  31. ^ The Economics of Love and Marriage
  32. ^ http://www.usimmigrationsupport.org/greencard_marriage.html
  33. ^ http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/yearbook/2003/2003IMMtables.pdf
  34. ^ Brownback, Sam (July 09, 2004). "Defining Marriage Down - We need to protect marriage". National Review. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  35. ^ Boswell, John (1994). Same-Sex Unions in Premodern Europe. Villard. ISBN 0679432280. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  36. ^ "Gay men are in much more of a hurry to 'wed' their partners". Times Online. 2006-12-05. Retrieved 2006-12-11. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  37. ^ "House of Bishops issues pastoral statement on Civil Partnerships". Church of England press release. 2005-07-25. Retrieved 2006-12-05. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Further reading