www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1963192.1963301acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams

Published:28 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online social media are complementing and in some cases replacing person-to-person social interaction and redefining the diffusion of information. In particular, microblogs have become crucial grounds on which public relations, marketing, and political battles are fought. We demonstrate a web service that tracks political memes in Twitter and helps detect astroturfing, smear campaigns, and other misinformation in the context of U.S. political elections. We also present some cases of abusive behaviors uncovered by our service. Our web service is based on an extensible framework that will enable the real-time analysis of meme diffusion in social media by mining, visualizing, mapping, classifying, and modeling massive streams of public microblogging events.

References

  1. J. Bollen, H. Mao, and A. Pepe. Determining the public mood state by analysis of microblogging posts. In Proc. of the Alife XII Conf. MIT Press, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Grier, K. Thomas, V. Paxson, and M. Zhang. @spam: the underground on 140 characters or less. In Proc. of the 17th ACM Conf. on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), pages 27--37, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Leskovec and C. Faloutsos. Sampling from large graphs. In KDD '06: Proc. of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international Conf. on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 631--636, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Mustafaraj and P. Metaxas. From obscurity to prominence in minutes: Political speech and real-time search. In WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line, page 317, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Ratkiewicz, M. Conover, M. Meiss, B. Gonçalves, S. Patil, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. Detecting and tracking the spread of astroturf memes in microblog streams. Technical Report arXiv:1011.3768 {cs.SI}, CoRR, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. H. Wang. Don't follow me: Twitter spam detection. In Proc. 5th International Conf. on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Yardi, D. Romero, G. Schoenebeck, and danah boyd. Detecting spam in a Twitter network. First Monday, 15(1), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WWW '11: Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web
        March 2011
        552 pages
        ISBN:9781450306379
        DOI:10.1145/1963192

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 March 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • demonstration

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader