www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Holocentric chromosomes in meiosis. I. Restriction of the number of chiasmata in bivalents

  • Published:
Chromosome Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of chiasmata in bivalents and the behaviour of chiasmata during the meiotic divisions were studied in Psylla foersteri (Psylloidea, Homoptera). Two chiasmata with a frequency of 97% and one or three chiasmata with frequencies of 2% and 0.9%, respectively, were observed in the largest bivalent in male meiosis. Meiosis was normal for the largest bivalents with one or two chiasmata, whereas bivalents with three chiasmata were not capable of completing anaphase I because of their inability to resolve the chiasma located in the middle. Consequently, the bivalent was seen as a laggard joining together two metaphase II daughter plates. Apparently, cells of this kind are eliminated. Inability to resolve the chiasma situated in the middle is attributed to the condensation process, which is unable to change the spatial orientation of successive chiasma loops in holocentric bivalents so that chiasma loops would be arranged perpendicular to each other at metaphase I. Thus they retain their parallel orientation from diplotene to metaphase I. Consequently, sister chromatid cohesion is exposed for release only in the outermost chiasmata but the chiasma in the middle continues to interlock the chromosomes in the bivalent. The elimination of the cells carrying bivalents with more than two chiasmata creates a strong selection against the formation of more than two chiasmata in holocentric bivalents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bickel SE, Orr-Weaver TL (1996)Holding chromatids together to ensure they go their separate ways.BioEssays 18: 293 -300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darlington CD (1965) Cytology.London: I &A Churchill Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grozeva S, Nokkala S (1996)Chromosomes and their meiotic behaviour in two families of the primitive infra-order Dipsocoromorpha (Heteroptera) Hereditas 125: 31 -36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkka O (1964)Recombination in six hemipteran families. Evolution 18:81 -88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones GH (1987)Chiasmata.In:Moens PB,ed. Meiosis. Orlando: Academic Press,pp 213 -244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsova VG, Maryanska-Nadachowska A, Nokkala S (2003)New approach to the Auchenorrhyncha cytogenetics: chromosomes of the meadow spittlebug Philaenus spumarius (L.) treated by various banding techniques. Folia biol (Krako ´w)51:33 -40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maryanska-Nadachowska A (2002)A review of karyotype variation in jumping plant-lice (Psylloidea,Sternorrhyncha, Hemiptera)and checklist of chromosome numbers. Folia biol (Krako ´w)50:135 -152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nokkala S, Nokkala C(1997)The absence of chiasma ter-minalization and inverted meiosis in males and females of Myrmus miriformis Fn.(Corizidae,Heteroptera). Heredity 78:561 -566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nokkala S, Laukkanen A, Nokkala C(2002)Mitotic and meiotic chromosomes in Somatochlora metallica (Corduli-dae,Odonata).The absence of localized centromeres and inverted meiosis. Hereditas 136:7 -12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perez R, Panzera F, Page J, Suja A, Rufas JS (1997)Meiotic behaviour of holocentric chromosomes:orientation and segregation of autosomes in Triatoma infestans (Hetero-ptera) Chromosome Res 5:47 -56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suomalainen E, Halkka O (1963)The mode of meiosis in the Psyllina.Chromosoma 14:498 -510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian R, Yuan F (1997)Chromosomes in twenty-ve species of Chinese membracids (Homoptera,Membracidae). Entom Sinica 4:150 -158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlmann F (2001)Chromosome cohesion and segregation in mitosis and meiosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13:754 -761.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White MJD (1973)Animal Cytology and Evolution,3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nokkala, S., Kuznetsova, V.G., Maryanska-Nadachowska, A. et al. Holocentric chromosomes in meiosis. I. Restriction of the number of chiasmata in bivalents. Chromosome Res 12, 733–739 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CHRO.0000045797.74375.70

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CHRO.0000045797.74375.70

Navigation