www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Current management of the adolescent varicocele

  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adolescents with varicoceles represent a large and heterogeneous group. This patient population has rapidly changing hormonal levels and may present at different stages of physical and pubertal development. At the same time, the adolescent varicocele is becoming a more widely appreciated and diagnosed entity with an estimated incidence of 15% to 29%. Although research into the pathophysiology and appropriate management is evolving, the implications of this disease for this age group are difficult to ascertain. Specifically, it remains unclear which patients need intervention and when the optimal time is to intervene. This review aims to clarify some of the controversy and to provide the most contemporary understanding of this disease entity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Zampieri N, Cervellione RM: Varicocele in adolescents: a 6-year longitudinal and followup observational study. J Urol 2008, 180(Suppl 4):1653–1656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cervellione RM, Corroppolo M, Bianchi A: Subclinical varicocele in the pediatric age group. J Urol 2008, 179:717–719.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hargreave TB: Varicocele-a clinical enigma. Br J Urol 1993, 72:401–408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kendirci M, Kadioglu A, Boylu U, Miroglu C: Urogenital surgery of the 15th century in Anatolia. J Urol 2005, 173:1879–1882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herman JR: Varicocele: some interesting early approaches. Urology 1978, 12:498C–498D.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kass EJ, Chandra RS, Belman AB: Testicular histology in the adolescent with a varicocele. Pediatrics 1987, 79:996–998.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Okstein CJ: Adolescent varicocele. Pediatrics 1987, 80:971.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein M: Adolescent varicocele. J Urol 1995, 153:484–485.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beck EM, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M: Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a macroscopic and microscopic study. J Urol 1992, 148:1190–1194.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gill B, Kogan SJ, Maldonado J, et al.: Significance of intraoperative venographic patterns on the postoperative recurrence and surgical incision placement of pediatric varicoceles. J Urol 1990, 144:502–505.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oster J: Varicocele in children and adolescents. An investigation of the incidence among Danish school children. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1971, 5:27–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Skoog SJ: Benign and malignant pediatric scrotal masses. Pediatr Clin North Am 1997, 44:1229–1250.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kadyrov ZA, Teodorovich OV, Zokirov OO, et al.: Bilateral varicocele: epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnosis [in Russian]. Urologiia 2007, 3:64–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shinsaka H, Fujimoto N, Matsumoto T: A rare case of right varicocele testis caused by a renal cell carcinoma thrombus in the spermatic vein. Int J Urol 2006, 13:844–845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shiraishi K, Takihara H, Kamiryo Y, Naito K: Usefulness and limitation of punched-out orchidometer in testicular volume measurement. Asian J Androl 2005, 7:77–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nashan D, Behre HM, Grunert JH, Nieschlag E: Diagnostic value of scrotal sonography in infertile men: report on 658 cases. Andrologia 1990, 22:387–395.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cayan S, Akbay E, Bozlu M, et al.: Diagnosis of pediatric varicoceles by physical examination and ultrasonography and measurement of the testicular volume: using the prader orchidometer versus ultrasonography. Urol Int 2002, 69:293–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Diamond DA, Paltiel HJ, DiCanzio J, et al.: Comparative assessment of pediatric testicular volume: orchidometer versus ultrasound. J Urol 2000, 164:1111–1114.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gat Y, Zukerman Z, Chakraborty J, Gornish M: Varicocele, hypoxia and male infertility. Fluid Mechanics analysis of the impaired testicular venous drainage system. Hum Reprod 2005, 20:2614–2619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Braedel HU, Steffens J, Ziegler M, et al.: A possible ontogenic etiology for idiopathic left varicocele. J Urol 1994, 151:62–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wishahi MM: Anatomy of the venous drainage of the human testis: testicular vein cast, microdissection and radiographic demonstration. A new anatomical concept. Eur Urol 1991, 20:154–160.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wishahi MM: Detailed anatomy of the internal spermatic vein and the ovarian vein. Human cadaver study and operative spermatic venography: clinical aspects. J Urol 1991, 145:780–784.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wishahi MM: Anatomy of the spermatic venous plexus (pampiniform plexus) in men with and without varicocele: intraoperative venographic study. J Urol 1992, 147:1285–1289.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Coolsaet BL: The varicocele syndrome: venography determining the optimal level for surgical management. J Urol 1980, 124:833–839.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Turner TT: The study of varicocele through the use of animal models. Hum Reprod Update 2001, 7:78–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Saypol DC, Howards SS, Turner TT, Miller ED Jr: Influence of surgically induced varicocele on testicular blood flow, temperature, and histology in adult rats and dogs. J Clin Invest 1981, 68:39–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nagler HM, Lizza EF, House SD, et al.: Testicular hemodynamic changes after the surgical creation of a varicocele in the rat. Intravital microscopic observations. J Androl 1987, 8:292–298.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ross JA, Watson NE Jr, Jarow JP: The effect of varicoceles on testicular blood flow in man. Urology 1994, 44:535–539.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tarhan S, Gumus B, Gunduz I, et al.: Effect of varicocele on testicular artery blood flow in men—color Doppler investigation. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2003, 37:38–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hanley HG, Harrison RG: The nature and surgical treatment of varicocele. Br J Surg 1962, 50:64–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zorgniotti AW, Macleod J: Studies in temperature, human semen quality, and varicocele. Fertil Steril 1973, 24:854–863.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gazvani MR, Wood SJ, Thomson AJ, et al.: Assessment of testicular core temperatures using microwave thermography. Hum Reprod 2000, 15:1723–1726.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wright EJ, Young GP, Goldstein M: Reduction in testicular temperature after varicocelectomy in infertile men. Urology 1997, 50:257–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ali JI, Weaver DJ, Weinstein SH, Grimes EM: Scrotal temperature and semen quality in men with and without varicocele. Arch Androl 1990, 24:215–219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Turner TT, Lopez TJ: Effects of experimental varicocele require neither adrenal contribution nor venous reflux. J Urol 1989, 142:1372–1375.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Harrison RM, Lewis RW, Roberts JA: Pathophysiology of varicocele in nonhuman primates: long-term seminal and testicular changes. Fertil Steril 1986, 46:500–510.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Shiraishi K, Takihara H, Naito K: Testicular volume, scrotal temperature, and oxidative stress in fertile men with left varicocele. Fertil Steril 2008 Aug 4 (Epub ahead of print).

  38. Turner TT, Lysiak JJ: Oxidative stress: a common factor in testicular dysfunction. J Androl 2008, 29:488–498.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ozbek E, Cekmen M, Simsek A, et al.: Comparison of antioxidant enzyme activity in the internal spermatic vein and brachial veins of patients with infertile varicocele. Int Urol Nephrol 2008, 40:679–683.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sakamoto Y, Ishikawa T, Kondo Y, et al.: The assessment of oxidative stress in infertile patients with varicocele. BJU Int 2008, 101:1547–1552.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zini A, Blumenfeld A, Libman J, Willis J: Beneficial effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on human sperm DNA integrity. Hum Reprod 2005, 20:1018–1021.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Benoff S, Chu CC, Marmar JL, et al.: Voltage-dependent calcium channels in mammalian spermatozoa revisited. Front Biosci 2007, 12:1420–1449.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Yesilli C, Mungan G, Seckiner I, et al.: Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm creatine kinase, HspA2 chaperone protein (creatine kinase-M type), LDH, LDH-X, and lipid peroxidation product levels in infertile men with varicocele. Urology 2005, 66:610–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shook TE, Nyberg LM, Collins BS, Mathur S: Pathological and immunological effects of surgically induced varicocele in juvenile and adult rats. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol 1988, 17:141–144.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Turner TT, Jones CE, Roddy MS: Experimental varicocele does not affect the blood-testis barrier, epididymal electrolyte concentrations, or testicular blood gas concentrations. Biol Reprod 1987, 36:926–932.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Cameron DF, Snydle FE: The blood-testis barrier in men with varicocele: a lanthanum tracer study. Fertil Steril 1980, 34:255–258.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Marmar JL: The pathophysiology of varicoceles in the light of current molecular and genetic information. Hum Reprod Update 2001, 7:461–472.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Naughton CK, Nangia AK, Agarwal A: Pathophysiology of varicoceles in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 2001, 7:473–481.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sofikitis N, Miyagawa I: Effects of surgical repair of experimental left varicocele on testicular temperature, spermatogenesis, sperm maturation, endocrine function, and fertility in rabbits. Arch Androl 1992, 29:163–175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Rajfer J, Turner TT, Rivera F, et al.: Inhibition of testicular testosterone biosynthesis following experimental varicocele in rats. Biol Reprod 1987, 36:933–937.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Turner TT, Evans WS, Lopez TJ: Gonadotroph and Leydig cell responsiveness in the male rat. Effects of experimental left varicocele. J Androl 1990, 11:555–562.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Fisch H, Hyun G, Hensle TW: Testicular growth and gonadotrophin response associated with varicocele repair in adolescent males. BJU Int 2003, 91:75–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Hadziselimovic F, Herzog B, Leibundgut B, et al.: Testicular and vascular changes in children and adults with varicocele. J Urol 1989, 142:583–585.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hadziselimovic F, Leibundgut B, Da Rugna D, Buser MW: The value of testicular biopsy in patients with varicocele. J Urol 1986, 135:707–710.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Goldstein M: New insights into the etiology and treatment of male infertility. J Urol 1997, 158:1808–1809.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Lenzi A, Gandini L, Bagolan P, et al.: Sperm parameters after early left varicocele treatment. Fertil Steril 1998, 69:347–349.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Madgar I, Weissenberg R, Lunenfeld B, et al.: Controlled trial of high spermatic vein ligation for varicocele in infertile men. Fertil Steril 1995, 63:120–124.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Report on varicocele and infertility. Fertil Steril 2006, 86(Suppl 5):S93–S95.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cayan S, Woodhouse CR: The treatment of adolescents presenting with a varicocele. BJU Int 2007, 100:744–747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Skoog SJ, Roberts KP, Goldstein M, Pryor JL: The adolescent varicocele: what’s new with an old problem in young patients? Pediatrics 1997, 100:112–121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Gershbein AB, Horowitz M, Glassberg KI: The adolescent varicocele I: left testicular hypertrophy following varicocelectomy. J Urol 1999, 162:1447–1449.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Gorelick JI, Goldstein M: Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 1993, 59:613–616.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Paduch DA, Niedzielski J: Semen analysis in young men with varicocele: preliminary study. J Urol 1996, 156:788–790.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Schlesinger MH, Wilets IF, Nagler HM: Treatment outcome after varicocelectomy. A critical analysis. Urol Clin North Am 1994, 21:517–529.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Alukal JP, Zurakowski D, Atala A, et al.: Testicular hypotrophy does not correlate with grade of adolescent varicocele. J Urol 2005, 174:2367–2370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Diamond DA, Zurakowski D, Bauer SB, et al.: Relationship of varicocele grade and testicular hypotrophy to semen parameters in adolescents. J Urol 2007, 178(4 Pt 2):1584–1588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Zampieri N, Corroppolo M, Zuin V, et al.: Longitudinal study of semen quality in adolescents with varicocele: to treat or not? Urology 2007, 70:989–993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Andrade-Rocha FT: Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of adolescents, adults and older men with varicocele. J Postgrad Med 2007, 53:8–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Carrillo A, Gershbein A, Glassberg KI, Danon M: Serum inhibin B levels and the response to gonadotropin stimulation test in pubertal boys with varicocele. J Urol 1999, 162(3 Pt 1):875–877.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Kass EJ, Freitas JE, Bour JB: Adolescent varicocele: objective indications for treatment. J Urol 1989, 142:579–582.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Kass EJ, Stork BR, Steinert BW: Varicocele in adolescence induces left and right testicular volume loss. BJU Int 2001, 87:499–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Kass EJ, Belman AB: Reversal of testicular growth failure by varicocele ligation. J Urol 1987, 137:475–476.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Cayan S, Akbay E, Bozlu M, et al.: The effect of varicocele repair on testicular volume in children and adolescents with varicocele. J Urol 2002, 168:731–734.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kolon TF, Clement MR, Cartwright L, et al.: Transient asynchronous testicular growth in adolescent males with a varicocele. J Urol 2008, 180:1111–1114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Marks JL, McMahon R, Lipshultz LI: Predictive parameters of successful varicocele repair. J Urol 1986, 136:609–612.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Marmar JL, Agarwal A, Prabakaran S, et al.: Reassessing the value of varicocelectomy as a treatment for male subfertility with a new meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2007, 88:639–648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Schlegel PN: Is assisted reproduction the optimal treatment for varicocele-associated male infertility? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Urology 1997, 49:83–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Hargreave T, Ghosh C: Varicocele: does treatment promote male fertility? Urologe A 1998, 37:258–264.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Salzhauer EW, Sokol A, Glassberg KI: Paternity after adolescent varicocele repair. Pediatrics 2004, 114:1631–1633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Schwentner C, Oswald J, Lunacek A, et al.: Optimizing the outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy using isosulfan blue: a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 2006, 175:1049–1052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Goldstein M, Tanrikut C: Microsurgical management of male infertility. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2006, 3:381–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Schiff J, Kelly C, Goldstein M, et al.: Managing varicoceles in children: results with microsurgical varicocelectomy. BJU Int 2005, 95:399–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Yaman O, Soygur T, Zumrutbas AE, Resorlu B: Results of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in children and adolescents. Urology 2006, 68:410–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Riccabona M, Oswald J, Koen M, et al.: Optimizing the operative treatment of boys with varicocele: sequential comparison of 4 techniques. J Urol 2003, 169:666–668.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Mazzoni G: Adolescent varicocele: treatment by antegrade sclerotherapy. J Pediatr Surg 2001, 36:1546–1550.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Mazzoni G, Minucci S, Gentile V: Recurrent varicocele: role of antegrade sclerotherapy as first choice treatment. Eur Urol 2002, 41:614–618.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Pasqualotto FF, Lucon AM, de Góes PM, et al.: Is it worthwhile to operate on subclinical right varicocele in patients with grade II–III varicocele in the left testicle? J Assist Reprod Genet 2005, 22:227–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Jarow JP, Ogle SR, Eskew LA: Seminal improvement following repair of ultrasound detected subclinical varicoceles. J Urol 1996, 155:1287–1290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Yamamoto M, Hibi H, Hirata Y, et al.: Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm parameters and pregnancy rate in patients with subclinical varicocele: a randomized prospective controlled study. J Urol 1996, 155:1636–1638.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Kass EJ, Marcol B: Results of varicocele surgery in adolescents: a comparison of techniques. J Urol 1992, 148:694–696.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Feber KM, Kass EJ: Varicocelectomy in adolescent boys: long-term experience with the Palomo procedure. J Urol 2008, 180(Suppl 4):1657–1659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Misseri R, Gershbein AB, Horowitz M, et al.: The adolescent varicocele. II: the incidence of hydrocele and delayed recurrent varicocele after varicocelectomy in a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2001, 87:494–498.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Glassberg KI, Poon SA, Gjertson CK, et al.: Laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy in adolescents. J Urol 2008, 180:326–330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Hassan JM, Adams MC, Pope JC 4th, et al.: Hydrocele formation following laparoscopic varicocelectomy. J Urol 2006, 175:1076–1079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Kocvara R, Dvoracek J, Sedlacek J, et al.: Lymphatic sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a microsurgical repair. J Urol 2005, 173:1751–1754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. VanderBrink BA, Palmer LS, Gitlin J, et al.: Lymphaticsparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy versus microscopic varicocelectomy: is there a difference? Urology 2007, 70:1207–1210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Diamond.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gargollo, P.C., Diamond, D.A. Current management of the adolescent varicocele. Curr Urol Rep 10, 144–152 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-009-0026-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-009-0026-7

Keywords

Navigation