www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cervical Pap Smear and Colposcopy in Detecting Premalignant and Malignant Lesions of Cervix

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of pap smear and colposcopy in detecting the premalignant and malignant lesion of the cervix. In this cross-sectional study, a total number of 160 women who presented with abnormal clinical problem or routine checkup during a 6-month period were included. All the patients underwent pap smear and colposcopy by the same gynecologists team, and finally, cervical biopsy was performed in all the individuals. The demographic and clinical characteristics as well as the obstetrics history were recorded. The diagnostic accuracy of each test was calculated according to the biopsy as gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) were recorded and compared between two modalities. Overall, we included a total number of 160 patients with mean age of 37.6 ± 7.32 (ranging from 24 to 63) years. The sensitivity and specificity of pap smear were found to be 47.19% and 64.79%, respectively. The PPV and NPV of the pap smear were calculated to be 88.69% and 38.46%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity, PPV, and NPV of the colposcopy were calculated as 64.72%, 52.74%, 76.32%, and 95.41%, respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the pap smear and colposcopy was reported to be 82.2% and 96.3%, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate that colposcopy has a higher diagnostic accuracy in detecting cervical premalignant and malignant lesions compared to the pap smear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM et al (2017) Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol 3(4):524–548. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Opoku CA, Browne EN, Spangenberg K, Moyer C, Kolbilla D, Gold KJ (2016) Perception and risk factors for cervical cancer among women in northern Ghana. Ghana Med J 50(2):84–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sims A, Archie-Booker E, Waldrop RT, Claridy M, Gerbi G (2018) Factors associated with human papillomavirus vaccination among women in the United States. ARC J Public Health Community Med 3(1):6–12. https://doi.org/10.20431/2456-0596.0301002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tuesley KM, Jordan SJ, Siskind DJ, Kendall BJ, Kisely S (2019) Colorectal, cervical and prostate cancer screening in Australians with severe mental illness: retrospective nation-wide cohort study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 53(6):550–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867418814945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Willems B, Bracke P (2018) The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia. BMC Health Serv Res 18(1):943. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3746-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pimple S, Mishra G, Shastri S (2016) Global strategies for cervical cancer prevention. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 28(1):4–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/gco.0000000000000241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schneider V (2017) Criticism of the pap smear as a diagnostic tool in cervical cancer screening. Acta Cytol 61(4–5):338–344. https://doi.org/10.1159/000477653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cobucci R, Maisonnette M, Macedo E, Santos Filho FC, Rodovalho P, Nobrega MM, Goncalves A (2016) Pap test accuracy and severity of squamous intraepithelial lesion. Indian J Cancer 53(1):74–76. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-509x.180825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harding C, Seal A, Pilotto L, Mackey K, Duncan G, Huynh R, McWilliam R, Blake S (2016) Accuracy of screening tools for pap smears in general practice. J Innov Health Inform 23(3):835. https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v23i3.835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Killeen JL, Dye T, Grace C, Hiraoka M (2014) Improved abnormal pap smear triage using cervical cancer biomarkers. J Low Genit Tract Dis 18(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e31828aeb39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, Walter SD, Hanley J, Ferenczy A, Ratnam S, Coutlee F, Franco EL (2007) Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 357(16):1579–1588. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa071430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kasraeian M, Asadi N, Ghaffarpasand F, Karimi AA (2011) Value of transvaginal ultrasonography in endometrial evaluation of non-bleeding postmenopausal women. Climacteric 14(1):126–131. https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2010.514079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Karimi Zarchi M, Binesh F, Kazemi Z, Teimoori S, Soltani HR, Chiti Z (2011) Value of colposcopy in the early diagnosis of cervical cancer in patients with abnormal pap smears at Shahid Sadoughi hospital, Yazd. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 12(12):3439–3441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karimi-Zarchi M, Peighmbari F, Karimi N, Rohi M, Chiti Z (2013) A comparison of 3 ways of conventional pap smear, liquid-based cytology and colposcopy vs cervical biopsy for early diagnosis of premalignant lesions or cervical cancer in women with abnormal conventional pap test. Int J Biomed Sci 9(4):205–210

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nkwabong E, Laure Bessi Badjan I, Sando Z (2019) Pap smear accuracy for the diagnosis of cervical precancerous lesions. Trop Dr 49(1):34–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049475518798532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huy NVQ, Tam LM, Tram NVQ, Thuan DC, Vinh TQ, Thanh CN, Chuang L (2018) The value of visual inspection with acetic acid and pap smear in cervical cancer screening program in low resource settings - a population-based study. Gynecol Oncol Rep 24:18–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2018.02.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Aijaz M, Alam K, Maheshwari V, Hakim S, Kamal M (2019) Clinicopathological study of role of CD34 expressions in the stroma of premalignant and malignant lesions of uterine cervix. Ann Diagn Pathol 38:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2018.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240(4857):1285–1293. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3287615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tuon FF, Bittencourt MS, Panichi MA, Pinto AP (2002) Sensibility and specificity of cytology and colposcopy exams with the histological evaluation of cervical intraepithelial lesions. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 48 (2):140–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-42302002000200033

  21. Dovey de la Cour C, Guleria S, Nygard M, Trygvadottir L, Sigurdsson K, Liaw KL, Hortlund M, Lagheden C, Hansen BT, Munk C, Dillner J, Kjaer SK (2019) Human papillomavirus types in cervical high-grade lesions or cancer among Nordic women-potential for prevention. Cancer Med 8(2):839–849. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1961

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hortlund M, Elfstrom KM, Sparen P, Almstedt P, Strander B, Dillner J (2018) Cervical cancer screening in Sweden 2014-2016. PLoS One 13(12):e0209003. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaferle JE, Malouin JM (2001) Evaluation and management of the AGUS Papanicolaou smear. Am Fam Physician 63(11):2239–2244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheung AN, Szeto EF, Leung BS, Khoo US, Ng AW (2003) Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population. Cancer 99(6):331–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the patients and their families who patiently participated in the current study. We would also like to acknowledge the editorial assistance of the Diba Negar Research Institute for improving the English and style of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Infertility Research Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Division of Oncology Gynecology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, OB & GYN ward, Faghihi Hospital, Zand Blvd, Shiraz, Iran

    Fatemeh sadat Najib, Zahra Shiravani, Tahereh Poordast & Elham Askary

  2. Fellowship of Oncology Gynecology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Masooumeh Hashemi

  3. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Sanam Sharifi

Authors
  1. Fatemeh sadat Najib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masooumeh Hashemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zahra Shiravani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tahereh Poordast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sanam Sharifi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Elham Askary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tahereh Poordast.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board and medical ethics committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Najib, F.s., Hashemi, M., Shiravani, Z. et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cervical Pap Smear and Colposcopy in Detecting Premalignant and Malignant Lesions of Cervix. Indian J Surg Oncol 11, 453–458 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-020-01118-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-020-01118-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation