Abstract
Drawing on the symbolic interactionist tradition, this paper focuses on the construction and management of welfare stigma in female welfare recipients' daily lives. In-depth interviews with ten women on welfare are analyzed, particularly in terms of how respondents manage their use of food stamps as stigma symbols. The complex and often contradictory pictures the women in this study painted of their feelings of stigma do not support the assumption, which underlies most research on welfare stigma, that welfare stigma is a coherent and relatively constant entity. The results of this study suggest instead that welfare stigma may vary depending on the social audience, situation, and recipient's life history. This analysis suggests that a symbolic interactionist approach to studying welfare stigma illuminates complex and dynamic aspects of welfare stigma that are obscured in other approaches and that future research on welfare stigma would benefit from drawing on the symbolic interactionist tradition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Duncan, G., and Hoffman, S. D. 1985. “A Reconsideration of the Economic Consequences of Marital Dissolution.”Demography, 22: 485–497
Duncan, G., and Morgan, J. 1981. Persistence and Change in Economic Status and the Role of Changing Family Composition. In: Hill, M., Hill, D. and Morgan, J., (Eds.),Five Thousand American Families, Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.
Fraser, N. 1989Unruly Practices, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Fraser, N., and Gordon, L. 1994. “A Genealogy of Dependency: Tracing a Keyword of the U.S. Welfare State.”Signs, 19:2:309–336.
Goffman, E. 1986.Stigma, New York: Simon and Schuster.
Horan, P., and Austin, P. 1974. “The Social Bases of Welfare Stigma.”Social Problems, 21:5: 646–657.
Katz, M. 1989.The Undeserving Poor, New York: Random House.
Kerbo, H. 1976. “The Stigma of Welfare and a Passive Poor.”Sociology and Social Research 60:2:173–187.
Loewenberg, F. 1981. “The Destigmatization of Public Dependency.”Social Service Review 55:3: 434–452.
Mead, L. 1986.Beyond Entitlement, New York: Macmillan.
Mink, G. 1990. The Lady and the Tramp: Gender, Race, and the Origins of the American Welfare State. In: Gordon, L. (Ed.),Women the State and Welfare, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Newman, K. 1989.Failing From Grace, New York: Vintage Books.
Nichols-Casebolt, A. 1986. “The Psychological Effects of Income Testing Income Support Benefits.”Social Service Review 60:2:287–302.
Quadagno, J. 1994.The Color of Welfare, New York: Oxford University Press.
Simmel, G. 1971. The Poor (Original, 1908). In: Levine, D. (Ed.),On Individuality and Social Forms, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Skocpol, T. 1988. The Limits of the New Deal System and the Roots of Contemporary Welfare Dilemmas. In: Weir, M., Orloff, S. and Skocpol, T. (Eds.),The Politics of Social Policy in the United States, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Skocpol, T. 1992.Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Snow, D., and Anderson, L. 1993.Down on Their Luck, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Stuart, A. 1975. “Recipient Views of Cash Versus In-Kind Benefit Programs.”Social Service Review, 49:1:79–91.
Weitzman, L. 1985.The Divorce Revolution, New York: The Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rogers-Dillon, R. The dynamics of welfare stigma. Qual Sociol 18, 439–456 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404490
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404490