as si
THE EDUCATION Of
AGONSEHVATIVE
REVI10 P. OLIVER
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Dr. Revilo
Pendleton Oliver, Professor of the Classics
at the University of Illinois for 32 years, is a
scholar of international distinction who has
written articles in four languages for fhe
most prestigous academic publications in
the United States and Europe.
During World War II, Dr. Oliver was
Director of Research in a highly secret agen-
cy of the War Department, and was cited for
outstanding service to his country.
One of the very few academicians who
has been outspoken in his opposition to the
progressive defacement of our civilization,'*
Dr. Oliver has long insisted that the fate of
his countrymen hangs on their willingness
to subordinate their doctrinal differences to
the tough but idealistic solidarity which is
the prerequisite of a Majority resurgence.
SOME QUOTABLE QUOTES FROM
AMERICA’S DECLINE:
On the 18th Amendment (Prohibition): “Very few Americans were sufficiently
sane to perceive that they had repudiated the American conception of government
and had replaced it with the legal principle of the ‘dictatorship of the proletariat,'
which was the theoretical justification of the Jews' revolution in Russia."
On Race: "We must further understand that all races naturally regard themselves
as superior to all others. We think Congoids unintelligent, but they feel only con-
tempt for a race so stupid or craven that it fawns on them, gives them votes, lavish-
ly subsidizes them with its own earnings, and even oppresses its own people to
curry their favor. We are a race as are the others. If we attribute to Ourselves a su-
periority, intellectual, moral, or other, in terms of our own standards, we are simp-
ly indulging in atautology, The onlyobjective criterion of superiority, among human
races as among all other species, is biological: the strong survive, the weak perish.
The superior race of mankind today is the on§ that will emerge victorious— whether
by its technology or its fecundity— from the proximate struggle for life on an over-
crowded planet."
AMERICA’S DECLINE
Order No. 01007- $10.00
plus $1.50 for postage & handling
376 pp., pb.
ORDER FROM:
LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS, Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 UC/ J
» !'■
::£-i
I; \
' *
W. .
I ; ■'
t :
i '
f *
r i
1 1
i. i
;i /
7
8
1
Liberty Bell
Hans Schmidt:
| “Sch(w)indler , s 'List”, .. page Sit | llMl
mill 7 :|a 3{ i
Good-bye to the:
Tyler C.
This is Your Brain, on Television/ page 32,
Colin Jordan: l ll lllllll illll
National Socialism: - 111 111 1111
What is National Socialism, page 44.
Letters to the Editor, page 46. 7
ilililililllllll
♦
i
\bice Of Thinking Americans
LIBERTY BELL
The magazine for Thinking Americans, has been published monthly since
September 1973 by Liberty Bell Publications. Editorial office: P.O. Box 21, Reedy
WV 25270 USA. Phone: 304-927-4486.
Manuscripts conforming to our editorial policy are always welcome and may
be submitted on IBM-, Apple //e-, or Apple/Macintosh-compatible diskette, or in
double-spaced, neatly typed format. Manuscripts can not be returned unless
accompanied by stamped, self-addressed envelope. Manuscripts accepted for
publication become the property of Liberty Bell Publications.
© Copyright 1991
by Liberty Bell Publications.
Permission granted to quote in whole or part any article except those subject to
author’s copyright. Proper source, address and subscription information must be
given.
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION RATES:
SAMPLE COPY $ 5 00
THIRD CLASS-BULK RATE-USA only $40 00
FIRST CLASS- US A $50.00
FIRST CLASS-all other countries $60.00
AIR MAIL-Europe, South America $70.00
Middle East, Far East, South Africa $75.00
Sample Copy . $ 6.50
BULK COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION:
10 copies $ 22.00
50 copies .' $ 90.00
100 copies $150.00
500 copies $600.00
1000 copies ...‘I $900.00
FREEDOM OF SPEECH — FREEDOM OF THOUGHT
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
The editor/publisher of Liberty Beil does' not necessarily agree with each and
every article in this magazine, nor does he subscribe to all conclusions arrived at
by various writers; however, he does endeavor to permit the exposure of ideas
suppressed by the controlled news media of this country.
It is, therefore, in the best tradition of America and of free men everywhere
that Liberty Bell strives to give free reign to ideas, for ultimately it is ideas which
rule the world and determine both the content and structure of our Western
culture.
We believe that we can and will change our« society for the better. We
declare our long-held view that no institution or government created by men, for
men, is inviolable, incorruptible, and not subject to evolution, change, or replace-
ment by the will of an informed people.
To this we dedicate our lives and our work. No effort will be spared and no
idea will be allowed to go unexpressed if we think it will benefit the Thinking
People, not only of America, but the entire world.
George P. Dietz, Editor & Publisher
D-DAY — 6 JUNE 1944
Reflections by One American Veteran
of the Second World War
by
Chcu les E. Weber y Ph.D ♦
Television stations throughout the United States are now
showing many views of the events of a bloody painful day that
took place a half century ago, gruesome scenes that included great
physical and mental pain for the participants, scenes that were re-
corded in thousands of feet of motion picture film. What did this
pain and these sacrifices on the beaches of Normandy really bring
about for Americans?
I am an American veteran of the Second World War, bom in
1922 just several days before Mussolini’s “march on Rome.” I was
sworn into the Army of the United States on 13 January 1943 and
discharged from military service on a pleasant spring day in
Heidelberg, 13 April 1946. During the three and a quarter years I
went to places to which I was ordered and did what I was ordered
to do. Since my overseas service was in Europe, my reflections on
6 June 1944 are mosdy concerned with the American military role
in Europe. When I view the film showing American military ac-
tions on 6 June 1944 I realize how fortunate I was not to have
been in a location such as the ‘Omaha” sector that day.
After the end of military actions in 1945 I was involved in a
process usually summarized by the word ‘Denazification,” which
afforded me the unusual opportunity of listening to views on both
sides of the war. My training had been in military intelligence and
my Military Occupational Specialty Number was 631, that of an
intelligence non-commissioned officer.
Opposing American military forces invading Europe in June
1944 were men of my race, in fact exclusively of my race, from
various parts of Europe, a Europe which had been exhausted by
nearly five years of war. At the time the United States was closely
allied with the most destructive tyranny which had ever existed in
the history of mankind. Men from many lands were opposing the
Liberty Bell /June 1994 — 1
advance of Communism into western Europe: Finns, Germans,
Hungarians, Italians, Romanians, Slovaks and Croatians as well as
nearly a million volunteers from the Netherlands, Belgium, France,
Denmark, Norway, etc. These volunteers included some of the fin-
est and most courageous men of all the combatants, not only in
terms of their military feats, but also because their governments,
some of which had fled into exile, disowned them and later tried
many of them as traitors for idealistically defending Europe against
the armed forces of Communism.
During the past few decades a number of courageous histori-
ans have been reevaluating die history of the Second World War
and in particular the American r61e in it. A notable, early example
is the book by the American intelligence officer. Col. John Beaty,
The Iron Cwtain Over America (1951) [available from LBP, $8.50
& $1.50 postage], A recent and quite disturbing book by the Cana-
dian journalist James Bacque, Other Losses (1989), deals with the
ruthless American treatment of Germans who had laid down their'
arms in 1945. Such historians have had the courage and intellec-
tual integrity to delve objectively into the realities of American par :
ticipation in the war in spite of a flood of continuing propaganda
by the American mass media that present the history of the war as
an American involvement in a “good war.” In addition to the two
titles mentioned above there are scores of other important books
in this category.
On 1 September 1939 National Socialist Germany, wisely or
not, attempted to gain back by force of arms parts of which had
been taken from Germany by Poland by force of arms during
1919-1920. Three days later the war between Germany and an
overconfident Poland was expanded into a world war by declara-
tions of war against Germany by a heavily armed and overconfi-
dent England and a somewhat hesitant France which considered
itself well protected behind an impressive line of modem fortifica-
tions. The motives for these declarations were complex, but fear of
German competition for export markets was unquestionably a
prominent factor at a time of lingering massive unemployment in
England. On 3 December 1939 another event took place about
which nearly all Americans are unaware. It is known to historians
2 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
I
as the Bromberg Bloody Sunday, a mass murder of civilian ethnic
Germans by Poles. This event, which was soon documented by a
large illustrated official publication of the German government,
brought about a grim and desperate atmosphere from the very
start of the war.
We know from documents of the Polish Foreign Office cap-
tured in Warsaw in 1939 by invading German forces that the dis-
eased, ruthless occupant of the American White House, who was
still preoccupied with massive unemployment after seven years in
office, was ordering his diplomats in Europe to help set the scene
for a war which was indeed destined to solve his problems with re-
gard to massive unemployment The shrewdly duplicitous, menda-
cious Roosevelt assured the American people that he had no
intention of sending their sons to fight on foreign battlefields, for
he was well aware that the vast majority of Americans wanted no
involvement in the European war that was raging at the time, es-
pecially after the outbreak of hostilities between Germany and the
U.S.S.R. Even such prominent Americans as Charles Lindbergh
and Walt Disney helped to lead the struggle against the threat of
involvement in the war.
On the basis of published histories of Soviet military units we
know today that a Communist invasion of western Europe was be-
ing planned, an earlier attempt at which was frustrated during
1919-1920. (See Bulletins 4 and 40, page 4.) In 1941 Soviet forces
were being ordered into offensive positions with their powerful,
modem tanks in number far greater than those at the disposal of
the German commands. When German political and military lead-
ers became convinced that time and further delay were putting
Germany at a military disadvantage that would become ever more
difficult to overcome, after arrogant demands by Soviet diplomats
in the autumn of 1940 and after a brutal Soviet occupation of the
Baltic republics in 1940 (a preview of what defeat by the U.S.S.R
would mean to Germany and indeed to the rest of Europe), Ger-
man leaders ordered an offensive action against the U.S.S.R on 22
June under the code name Operation Barbarossa, which met with
astonishing successes against the Soviet armed forces that had
been preoccupied with future offensive actions without making
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 3
sufficient defensive preparations, thus another instance of overcon-
fidence. The initial German military successes took place in spite of
inadequate preparations for a sustained offensive, even including a
shortage of uniforms suitable for winter warfare.
Roosevelt had an intense personal hatred of Hider, who had,
in some important ways, been far more successful in solving eco-
nomic problems of their respective lands. Roosevelt had come
from a very wealthy family, in contrast to Hider, who came from
modest circumstances and who had served his nation in its armed
forces as a close witness to the horrors of war. During 19401941
under Roosevelt’s leadership American armed forces and materials
of war were being committed increasingly to military actions
against Germany in spite of the overwhelming sentiments of the
American people against military involvement in another Euro-
pean war. In a long speech on 11 December 1941 Hider finally ex-
pressed his recognition that Roosevelt’s diabolical efforts had won
out against the will of the American people and that a state of war
with the United States existed. (See Bulletins 29 and 36.) How-
ever, without such a formal declaration, the full forces of American
military and industrial potential might have been delayed for
months or even years. Hitler had underestimated the will of the
American people to stay out of the European war. When one reads
Hitler’s speech of 11 December 1941 it becomes apparent that
Hider had become deeply involved emotionally by American ac-
tions against German naval forces in the Adantic The Japanese at-
tack on Pearl Harbor several days earlier had made Roosevelt’s
desire for full American involvement an easily attained reality and
his political position virtually unassailable.
The beaches of Normandy, soaked with the blood of American
young men on June 6, 1944, are a symbol of American sacrifices in
a war which produced results that later caused many thoughtful
Americans to ask themselves what the bitter sacrifices had really
brought about. For over four decades eastern and much of central
Europe were tortured by a brutal, exploitive Soviet occupation.
During 1945-1946 expulsions of ethnic Germans from areas that
had been parts of Germany for centuries resulted in the deaths of
millions [Suggested r eading: Gruesome Harvest: The Costly Attempt
4 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
to Exteiminate the German People , by Ralph Keeling, available from,
LBP, $5.00 + $1.50 postage]. By the start of the Soviet blockade
of Berlin in June 1948 all Americans except the most simple-
minded admirers of Roosevelt had to ask themselves what we had
done as a nation. I was still in Europe during the summer of 1948,
having taken a position with the Department of War, after my dis-
charge from the army. The summer of 1948 was one of great ten-
sion and fear that a war would break out again, this time in a
military vacuum that would have permitted a rather sudden defeat
of whatever western military forces were still left in Europe and a
subsequent Soviet occupation of most or all of Europe that had not
already been occupied by Soviet forces.
We Americans can be proud that our Constitution forbids “ex
post facto” laws in keeping with thousands of years of European le-
gal traditions expressed, for example, in the ancient Latin legal dic-
tum, “nulla poena sine lege.” One day in the summer of 1946 I
attended the protracted show trials in Nuremberg of German lead-
ers who had been obeying the laws of their country and defending
it against ruthless foes who had made genoddal threats against the
German nation in the form of the Morgenthau Plan and other
means. The Nuremberg trials were a cynical repudiation of Ameri-
can legal principles, against which some courageous American
voices were raised at the time, including some members of the
United States Senate. Both Senator Robert Taft and Senator
Joseph McCarthy died prematurely.
The Nuremberg trials, with their cynical disregard of American
and European legal principles (similar to present efforts to sup-
press investigations of various historical questions in Canada and
Europe), can be seen as a sort of psychological necessity for most
Americans who had come to realize what their country had done
in Europe and that a military vacuum had been created in Europe
with little more than American atomic bombs as a deterrent to fur-
ther Soviet military advances. The trials helped to rationalize the
moral aspects of our conduct of the war, including the merciless
and largely unnecessary bombing of German and other civilian
populations, as in the case of Dresden in February 1945. The dis-
graceful American postwar treatment of German prisoners of war
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 5
and Operation Keelhaul were not well known at the time to most
Americans. Such actions were not worthy of a nation that claimed
the influence of Christian moral principles.
The American ‘Victory” of 1945 and the subsequent Nurem-
berg trials have poisoned and debilitated the psyche and even the
will to survive of the Aryan component of the American popula-
tion. They have acted like a boomerang that returns to strike the
thrower. In one law after the other, in one judicial decree after the
other and in one foreign policy after the other the poison and de-
bilitation have manifested themselves. During the past few dec-
ades the fortunes of the Aryan components of the American
population have been declining year in and year out. The ‘Holo-
caust” material and other myths and quasi myths generated with
well calculated objectives during and after the Second World War
have so thoroughly poisoned and debilitated the American Aryan
will to survive that this component of the population of the United
States is being overwhelmed demographically and economically,
seemingly almost without its awareness, let alone a will to resist,
on the part of the victims. The defense of the Aryan nations has be-
come unfashionable, an action out of season, even immoral.
The flood of illegal immigrants into the United States from un-
successful lands, “affirmative action” (a cynical euphemism for put-
ting Aryan men at a disadvantage in employment), the frequency
of abortions which have caused an absolute and even greater rela-
tive decline of the Aryan population of the United States, the in-
creasing incidence of miscegenation, our lack of a will to punish
sufficiently crimes against Aryans by members of hostile races, the
hostility to what remains of Caucasian populations in Africa on the
part of “our” State Department, the giving away of our canal at
Panama by an obviously corrupted Congress against the over-
whelming sentiments of the American people and welfare policies
which have caused such a dysgenic development of the population
of the United States that it can no longer compete successfully on
world markets are just some of the tragic manifestations of the poi-
soning and debilitation of the American Aryan mind, which seem
to me to be the insidious, seldom recognized result of American in-
volvement in the Second World War. Wars seeih to have the abil-
6 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
ity to ‘hallow any cause,” to use Nietzsche’s phrase. Whatever
Hitietis faults or mistakes might have been, his basic aim was the
welfare of Aryans. Through the constant denigration of Hider and
his National Socialism in the popular media, dais aim is being con-
standy denigrated, in turn.
The economically debilitating ‘Cold War” and the costiy wars
in Korea and Vietnam must also be regarded as at least indirect re-
sults of what I am inclined to call ‘The War to Make the World
Safe for Communism” and the tragic mistakes which the United
States made during and after that war, notably its naive or even
treasonous support of the evil Soviet empire. The Second World
War offered a perfect pretext for the growth of Big Government
and the introduction of payroll deductions. They are amongst the
most damaging, still-extant legacies of the war as far as the Cauca-
sian taxpayer is concerned.
The' members of the airforces of England, Germany and the
United States were physically and mentally outstanding specimens
of Aryan man. Their genes were the supreme result of hundreds of
thousands of years of evolution of mankind. They died by the
scores of thousands while fighting each other in the flames, explo-
sions and impacts of falling aircraft. In most cases their genes were
lost forever. That loss was a striking example of the dysgenic ef-
fects of modern warfare. Far more insidious and perhaps far more
important were the poisoning and debilitation of the psyche of Ar-
yan man as a result of the war.
It seems especially ironic that a president who slyly and self-
ishly evaded military service during the war in Vietnam and whose
past personal behavior is a source of shame to our country is now
representing the United States in commemorations of the sacrifices
made by American soldiers on the beaches of Normandy and cen-
tral Italy. Clinton has the duplicitous manner which is all too remi-
niscent of Roosevelt’s manner.
It is proper that we honor the well-intended sacrifices of
American soldiers who were killed and wounded during the Sec-
ond World War but we must also keep the result of these sacrifices
in their proper perspective, especially with regard to the long-
range results of the war. O
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 7
V
“SCH(W)INDLER’S LIST”
A German View of this Zionist Propaganda Movie
by Hans Schmidt
As I am writing these lines, the anti-German propaganda
movie “Schindler's List” has been in the theaters for 16 weeks.
It is shown in 1,382 locations across the country, and has so
far grossed $74.7 million. Needless to say, the Jewish over-
lords are making every effort to promote this hate film, and
everywhere brainwashed teachers are taking their pupils to
see it.
Have no fear though: I stick by my prior statement that al-
most everything the Oberjuden are doing now, including this
stupid film and the numerous “Holocaust” museums and me-
morials, will backfire. (Just notice what is currently happening
to the unrepairable relations between Blacks and Jews.)
Below you will find an important Zeitdokument (document
pertaining to our era). As you can see, it is from the 31 October
1919 issue of an American Jewish magazine (The American He-
brew) and must therefore be true. Please notice that Gov.
Gwynn spoke already then of “6 million” apd a ‘holocaust.”
This information was discovered by the Polish Historical Soci-
ety, 91 Strawberry Hill Ave., Stamford CT 06902.
I hope you realize that I had to see “Schindler’s List.” With-
out viewing it, I would be unable to give my personal assess-
ment of this piece of Liigenpropaganda. But don’t worry, I didn’t
pay the full price of admission. However, before I tell you of
my impressions, please read the two newspaper items below.
The (German- American!) man from Pennsylvania assumes that
the film provides “documentary evidence” of the ‘Holocaust,”
and the seemingly also German-American woman from upstate
New York came away feeling that she now owes the Jewish
race [sic] a debt that can never be repaid. Precisely what the
Jewish activists had intended when they embarked on produc-
ing “Schindler’s List.” Am I concerned because this movie had
such an impact on people like that? Not in the least. It isn’t the
Buehlers and the Herrs of this world that will play important
8 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
THE AMERICAN HEBREW
OcLoboi 3ij 3010
The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!
By MARTIN H. GLYNN .
(Rormcr Governor of (he Elate of X. Y.)
From ncroxi Ibe »ca »lx million men
and women call lo us (or help, md eight
hundred thousand little children cry for
bread.
These children, thci/e men and ■women
are our fellowmemhcra of the human
family, with the same claim on life as
ve, the eame susceptibility to the winter's
cold, the same propensity to death before
the fanga of hunger. Within them reside
the Illimitable possibilities for the ad*
yancemcnl of the human race as naturally
would reside In six million human beings.
ltV may not be their keeper t but tee
ought to be their helpers.
In the face of death, in the Ihroea of
aUrvallon there Is no place for mental
distinctions of creed, no place for physical
differentiation* of race. In this catas-
trophe, when jb million hurosn being* -
are being whirled toward the grave by a
cruel and relentless fate, only the most
Idealistic promptings of human nature
should sway tbs heart and mors ths
hand.
Six million men and women are dying
from lack of the necessaries of life; eight
hundred thousand children cry for broad.
And this fats Is upon them through no
fault of their own, through no transgres*
•ion of the laws of Ood or man; but
through the awful tyranny of war and a
bigoted lust for Jewish blood.
In this threatened holocaust of human
life, forgotten are the niceties of philoso-
phical distinction, foi gotten are ths dif-
ferences of historical Interpretation; and
the determination to help the helpless, to
ah e 1 1 er^ae^bo^jj^^^j^oth^he^a k ed
;■ w < sr •. . , a-j-. ■
’>• r «• »%**£ * .
, V’ j .. Vs*. !•
wmm
WclH. *-
fe/V'-.L •
.7 5
s *
iL.r Vr • /
' *V L. T s,
4 , * s»«» ■
' ■ 7t /-r v -L
.. V«i* .* * :t
, i ~ •
/ •'
w
.«jf
Wr]* » t? t , •
WiiiTiira t
In all of ua by tho hand of Ood, and tbo I hit 771 h DIvlHlon alone there wers H.OOU
man or woman who can, end will nol, of them, «»d In Arguime Forest this dltl*
hear the cry of the starving; who can, slim rrtpj'qyd ht^tlp rmrm guna. Thla
and will not, lake heed of tbo wull of ' > 1 ^*vJLi Ut , iBli || bo ^s
jjylng; who tan, and will not,
hand lo
roles in the tough times to come. Particularly people like that
will suffer horribly because of their obvious stupidity and gulli-
bility. They, like the Jews, will do everything wrong from this
time forward.
The underlying lie and misconception about “Schindler’s
List” is the generally broadcast assumption that the “Schindler
Jews” would all have been murdered had Oskar Schindler not
“rescued” them. Naturally, that is total nonsense. I say it again:
If Hitler had really intended to have all the Jews within the
German WWII realm killed, there would not have been “mil-
lions” (according to the New York Times of April 1993) of survi-
vors. Even in the movie there are hints of the infighting for
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — :
needed workers among Third Reich authorities that had taken
place especially in the latter stages of the war, when all kinds of
laborers, including the Jewish ones,' were in desperate short-
age. That was probably the sole reason why the train with the
“Schindler women” had been diverted to Auschwitz (a huge in-
3^ £ W 3
n /*
° 2 3
pi <4-5 ro 3 3 —
m cr^n ^ -
o v O i — a> to
rs 3* 3 tT
o £2 ™
^ 2 m T
g-°-g=rSg ;
S.! 2 -?a e?S
c ?4- rr !“t
fD ^”OQ fa ra
3 * 5*3 °
c - -
■ — • 3 to ,£w
3. p o cr ra ui
*“o 5 rp 3 °
f 3 t’
* — r J— I o hj
?T3 3 V 3 1*1
rs tro
3 ra 3 3-: a> -
£T. to q. D oq
I ro S(n D- o
3 n 1
§ 5 1
< 3
3'-
h- •«
ro m
’ 10 at ,4 S' xr
S? °-9g -3 3
.3 o3.re gK
e w <« a-" §
X O 3 < 2 3
* o 3 r> <2 3
< gVP cr 3
t)v O Q *0 5
W * < to spg
to 1-32 3 3
■iS.33 «K“
C n> 3 ^rp
:S 3 £ g -
- r-f- O 3 -C W
o w r’ - <-♦ - p
a q =2.3
< 3 $ ft 3
3*0 O C
p 3 o 2 3
°£1S § 3
: q 2I._3 ^
• 5. P O
•to n 3 sr
Ta“§ 2 -l|l 3 "“il 5
f/5 CJ /T> 3 c+* r ■*- pi- p
01 D- M .l< r- 3‘ 3* 3* " ^
^ to *-i
:X) ju
P 3 £
3 CL P *-4
n'q< F
3 Tr>
n
5‘sraw
g ~.rr <
-- P P 3
CD M o
c o 55 3
— 5 3 _
3 -
«« 5 g 9
v; w5 o
o p jl —
f*- 3 O P
i— - pi 3 ~ to
C 3 t r-r
to Q to’ *— 1
£ 5f jr.“<o
a tfl 3 o
ofg o
3.0 ■§ S
■f 7 o «
♦ r_i ^
3 r^t: o «
3s«h;|
i‘H £2 ° a:
- nr ^ clO ,
^^istoj-t. 3- •— • ~ nr.
to P 4 r— ,-.- Q ,p tf -
o q-o.aq S'.
§ g 2.00-
2 ° 2 n> 3 ^
ra^nr^So’toV
0 -P .0 g rr-3 • to 3 o
■ ^ frt — (D a”
ta K tn ” 3_ci-
3 2*3 £J 3 Cn in
r a C (X> O
3 « 3 a< Cf
nrn«3 _ P 2
q: °
n>
4 to
* M ■
•< 3.*
c tr?
;Q'!? Z
: eJ" ^
■CS 1
P
:p =»***
M. 1 ^
Oo‘o co 3
3 oq ’-‘3
M* M 2
r-H r-+- * ^
S’ O 3 3 “O
^ 3 r-sP P
3 O O
aq
O J- 3. 3 c
< n to - -
t S3 i to to
3 _ C-j
r— uq to <
cl< F 1
_ p “ :
P 3 < ;
D 3 P ;
£ 3 £'
r:p 2 *
0 3 3*
grpi
3 r+- 3 (
CL 3H7S *
o fl 23,
:i*V S
I AV
j— ^
p 3
Cl —
CT“
?o
i-4
X
3 Slf 3“5
X W —hJ P 3
> 3 s^< |
3 ElP A P to
<-r
O
cr
3
W
£0
§g*
o 3
P N*
to i — 1
JT" C
p 3
n 3
h j r\ -h*
5 § | o
o 2 p o p*c
p ^ p 2 a> 3
^ 3 o -3.0
g.x 3
£^t— IP ^ F
to c^'er P ° *<
CU ^ k— -
CO < P P to
JC 3
C
o'-<
■to
r— to
|*5:
. 3 o
>P
P- 3 P
3 ■— * r—
>3 O- o “
^ ro g, = £
G^ggSo
* p P q O 3
P 3 on o
g*3S£H
3 S- §
K—( O
o’ 0
2 ( ~ 1 '
'3 O
Cl
o
O c-
FS
to
Q
to cu
b:^
p _.
cl
2 > 1
S 3 s
3 O 3
— *1 F
3 o<<
r-— as 3
5*3 to"
n>
to Oq S
ST 3 3 '
^ »-3
o2c
•— » *
4 3 .
o 2 -
. 3 nr
: 3 °
Oc §
0 o 3
^ «
«s-a
1 g°
S3 3 cr p *3
o’ o “ p 2
- 3 d ti o
p- o sr o B
g* » tS 5a
s' C CIO 2 g 1
3 a* S s. S
■ 2 cr. « ar
— 1 3 cr 1 .
’< CTQ r* O
O ^ tJ. f4
c GT O O
g F to
3 1 — 1 as
O a* d
o c nr
q 3- o
3 r o
3 CD
— O to
> P P
3 'CD CT3
O s o
n. jr g.
Q 2 o
n X nr
♦ . ' 3
Cl — - 3
o nr o
o n 0
to
q-cr
-3 m
o> 0
a. ::
fu ■••
X
• f.
. P Vi
'3 .-
an-
o ,w
<3 nc
p F
3 ro
P --
CL < -
• O
*— t 3
r— <— *
— nr
to «
11 dd
^ M
3 *-r*
£U t3
. P t±J
. O F
,• c ty)
* g Pd
o' p
P 3 O
3 3 Cl
3 id
to o oj
pj <3 <-
< n 03
O) " o
cr s? 2
3 ft) t-L
w ^ o
ro q
3 8
. CU CL
P* cr
P ro
£L CL
|§
3 p (
cr,
sf«
>§•
y» 3
3 CX
F<
2, o
g JT
CD 3
3 0
p
< I— t
p 3
^ 3
'■j q.
L* 1 o
H> >-T-l
fO HH
X o
<D >
3 6
<T> <-
P ^
H 4 . H
3 *
ci 3
nr
ro ^
*~^23
w o
o o
a> cl
a> pi
Po
2 3
2 3 cr s.
3 0 *-
rt> l <
P c rr
’< o P
2 erf’
p. o ro
OlP ►—
“ to ft}
H'2.S
er3“
c o 3
3 -.d
3 !? 3
p 4o*
° CD P
to to o
♦ o
CL d
m cr
n M *
ro <
3 ju
' cr
q 1 ro
Oq XJ
fD 3
3 0 >q
p ^ nr
3 0 3.
P 3 to
cr cr. — .
o' o 1/1
3 3 P
. M rocL
V-4* ^TJ
o 2°*
•-f r+
3 — n
nr; p to
2 ro 2
F’ to p
‘C crq ^
* 0O3.
O Oq
3 P
h, 3
o cr.
3 O
p cr
q ro
3 to ><
to cr or
*— < 2 o
ro 3 .
f 3 3' c/i
p 3 p
c o cr
,f4 C 3*
X 3 3
I — p
rgs
c p r*.
3 * — • to
p3 r
g o to
^ < r^-
p cr
^ CLro
F?B
3
3 o
q nr
<; a> ►— I 1
IT) c — O
3 n> w
cr ^ 3
p ^ p
3
3 3 <
113 P P
3- n <
Pp 4
• cr»
p o
„ ID
Cr nr
p p
£y/?/i ct/^./u, y fi8c>ur s/Aa
10 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
dustrial complex), if this part of the story is true.
In the meantime (as a direct result of the publicity, and be-
cause Jews have an innate need to “shine”), there must be
6,000 (rather than the 1,000 plus) former Schindler Juden liv-
ing in the U.S. alone. Those that I saw on TV looked quite and
healthy and wealthy, no doubt due to the involuntary largess of
the Germans. We can safely assume that most of them would
have survived the war even without Oskar Schindler, those that
wouldn’t have made it would probably have been victims of the
emergency wintertime transport from Auschwitz (and other
concentration camps) to locations in the West: of Allied air
raids, and of epidemics such as occurred at Bergen-Belsen, that
were the direct result of the chaotic conditions at war’s end.
Since I come from an area in Germany where there is a
concentration of heavy industry, I well remember the multi-
tudes of foreigners working in the coal mines, the steel mills
and the other plants during that time. On weekends, the inner
city of Saarbriicken was crammed full of (especially) ‘French
and Polish POWs, Ukrainian and Russian Ostarbeiterinnen (fe-
male laborers from the East), Spanish and French volunteer
workers, and forced (in today’s nomenclature “slave-”) laborers
from Holland and Denmark, none of whom were with armed
German guards. Several times I also took notice of Jews with
the Star of David sown on their clothes riding in the street car
(the last time I saw this was when I was in furlough shortly af-
ter the destruction of Saarbriicken in an air raid on 5 October
1944). Nobody bothered them or anyone else. There were not
even altercations between the various groups of foreigners, as
is occurring in ’’free" Germany today. That in 1943 and 1944 I
wasn’t surprised or shocked by Jews having a symbol of their
origin attached to their clothing can be easily explained: at that
time nearly everybody wore some kind of uniform or special
designation “marker.” The Ostarbeiterinnen, for instance, had a
tag with the word OST (East) on their coats or dresses, and I
was proud of the insignia on my uniform.
Another lie concerning Steven Spielberg’s film is the fact
that he projected the Jews as totally innocent bystanders who
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 1 1
had to obey any or all German orders, “or else.” We know that
Germany had a right to regard and treat all Jews anywhere in
the world as enemy aliens ever since 23 March 1933, when the
leadership of World Jewry had declared war on Deutschland be-
cause Hitler was on the way to curtail the (then existing) inor-
dinate Jewish power in and over the Reich.
(The argument that World Jewry was in no position to de-
clare war on Germany, since at that time there was no standing
Jewish army, doesn’t hold water: then as now, the top Jewish
leadership was able to mobilize and utilize the armed might of
the entire non-Jewish nations for their own nefarious purposes.
Compare how the armed forces of the United States and the in-
dustrial and economic potential of this country have been used
in the furtherance of Israeli and Zionist aims. Remember the
Gulf War.)
Whoever saw Spielberg’s film must have noticed the total
absence of weapons in the hands of the Jews of Cracow. This is
contrary to the facts. On a wall of the Washington Holocaust
Museum I discovered a sign with the statement that in more
than a hundred ghettoes underground organizations of the Zi-
onists and young Jewish Communists had been in existence.
What do you think these people did, only deal in black market
activities? I have in my possession a great number of books
written by Jews about the ‘heroic deeds” of the Jewish partisan
fighters. There is no doubt that they did great damage to the
German war effort, the main purpose of which it was to keep
(Jewish-) Bolshevism out of Europe. The activities of these par-
tisans had to be countered with all the force the Germans could
muster. Finally, since the benign ghetto concept didn’t work,
the Reich Government had no choice but to quarantine many
Jews in the now notorious concentration camps.
The overblown scenes of the brutal cleansing of the Cracow
ghetto by German forces must be compared to current attempts
by the American government to fight against the proliferation
of drugs in (black) American ghettoes. We all know how deter-
mined SWAT and DEA forces break into house where drugs are
suspected, and how rough the people inside (including chil-
12 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
j
t
l
\
l
i
dren) are being treated. Yet, this involves only drugs. Imagine
how these same American police forces would have acted had
some of the inhabitants of these drug houses been suspected of
blowing up a hospital filled with wounded officers, as hap-
pened near Cracow. (There, Jewish partisans blew up a Ger-
man hospital train.) I guess, ‘Waco” tells us that in such a case
there wouldn’t be anybody left to be put in a concentration
camp. Therefore, any American abhorrence of what happened
or might have happened in wartime Poland is totally mis-
placed.
The “Schindler’s List”-assumption that Jews in ’Nazi" Ger-
many were totally without rights and representation is also
false. Up until the clearance of the ghettoes toward the end of
the war (Warsaw 1943), Cracow 1944, Lodz 1943 or 1944,
etc.) each ghetto had a Judenrat (Jewish Council) where the
day-to-day operations of the ghetto, and the relations with the
German authorities, were handled. The Jews could and did
complain, and were listened to, as can be read in ghetto dia-
ries. At any rate, the Jews in the ghettoes had more rights un-
der German suzerainty than had the German population under
American occupation between 1945 and 1947 (an American
‘law” of 1945 proscribed the death sentence for anyone caught
with a kitchen knife more than 9 inches long. Once in the con-
centration camps, Jews were not without recourse against mis-
treatment and brutalities, as is proven by trial records of camp
guards that can still be seen in various archives. That a “com-
mandant” like Amon Goth would use people for target shoot-
ing, as is shown in Spielberg’s propaganda movie, was simply
impossible.
Only recently I came into possession of evidence that at
least up until 1943 (until after the German defeat at Stalin-
grad) the European Jews still had their own newspapers, and
that at least until 1938 — five years into the Third Reich— there
were as many as 65 Jewish publications in Germany, many of
which were openly anti-"Nazi”. Compare this to the almost total
destruction of the German language press in the United States
in the First World War (meaning, of course, that Americans
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 13
Hi
have absolutely no right to criticize the Germans for similar ac-
tions against their minorities 20 years later) . Or, can anyone
tell me how many publications in the Japanese language were
still being printed in America in 1944? Knowing this system
here (and its actions and reactions). I’d bet not one.
Incidentally, the propaganda being spread that “the Nazis”
treated all Jews alike, namely bad, is also untrue. In this regard
I would only like to mention that as late as January 1945 privi-
leged Jews were transported in first-class train accommoda-
tions from the Bergen-Belsen transit camp (where only a few
months later thousands, among them Anne Frank, were to die
of hunger typhus) to Switzerland; that up until the spring or
summer of 1944 the bulk of Hungarian Jews lived far better
and more free than the population of Germany, and that a Jew-
ish hospital (only for Jewish patients) existed in Berlin right to
the end of the war when the Russians took it over for their own
wounded.
Those of you who have seen “Schindler’s List” may remem-
ber that the road leading to the Plaszow camp had been plas-
. tered with gravestones from Jewish cemeteries (with the
Hebrew inscriptions conveniently facing up). Spielberg obvi-
ously wanted to create the impression that the ‘bad Nazis” had
destroyed all Jewish cemeteries, and used the gravestones for
road building. In forty-five years in the U.S., I have never read
an article stating the fact that during the entire Third Reich the
only damage to Jewish cemeteries in Deutschland was caused
by Allied bombs. There was not even the ubiquitous vandalism
so endemic in democracies”. (A few years ago there were re-
ports of one Hamburg Jewish cemetery having been turned
into a parking lot but the reason for this was simply because
the leaders of that particular Jewish community had sold the
property (illegally, to boot) once most of the congregation had
left Germany).
I have stated before that the entire “Schindler’s List” Rum-
mel (hullabaloo) was caused by the consternation of the top
Jewish leadership over the fact that the disbelief in the “Holo-
caust fairy tales was taking hold of the psyche of majority
14 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
Americans. Proof for this assumption could be found on 7 April
1994, the (now official) ‘Holocaust Remembrance Day”, when
the Jewish propaganda chiefs went crazy. There were memo-
rial services in the most incongruous places, among them the
United States Naval Academy, were Spielberg received an
award, (and, I assume, at West Point and Colorado Springs), at
the U.S. Capitol, and in many state legislatures. Watching TV
on that day I counted no less than 3 mentionings of the ”6 mil-
lion Jews killed by the Nazis" in a five minute broadcast. In my
imagination I could see millions of Americans yawn when they
heard this.
Watching recent Jewish antics regarding the ‘Holocaust”
and “Schindler’s List” (and also their shock over the fact that
most majority Americans gleefully expect that the (part-Jewish)
American boy accused of “vandalism” in Singapore will be
caned), I came to the following conclusion:
The Jews know all the weaknesses of the Aryans
but they do not know our strengths... and therein
lies their misfortune.
When the newsmedia broke the story about the caning of
Michael Fay, I did not have the slightest doubt that most ^
Americans (including the Blacks) agreed with the stance of the
Government of Singapore that six lashes were appropriate. I
also ‘knew” that deep down most white Americans wished that
such a punishment could be meted out here. Nevertheless, the
(almost 100%) liberal editors of this nation’s newspapers were
genuinely shocked to discover that Americans were so ‘blood-
thirsty”, a term one publication used, and wanted to see ’’this
poor boy, who only caused material damage" to suffer. For me
this is proof how far removed the liberal mediacrats are. from
the people’s real thinking. It is interesting to note that a con-
certed campaign in behalf of the miscreant was admitted in one
of the papers I am reading regularly. Obviously, this would not
have happened had Fay not been (part-?) Jewish. They even
managed to utilize the services of Bill Clinton.
* * * jfC
The bolshevisation of the United States is now taking place
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 15
at a rapid pace. If you were sitting where I am, and you would
see all the information regarding this fact accumulating at my
desk, you would turn gray in a week. ‘They” never stop... The
United States (as we know it) is doomed. As predicted in our
March GANPAC BRIEF, the Oberjuden are using so-called laws
and many regulations to hog-tie the population of this country.
Roberta Achtenberg, the lesbian Jewess now in high position at
HUD, works 25 hours a day to forcefully integrate America’s
housing now that it is obvious that 30 years of pro-race mixing
propaganda has failed. Senator Howard Metzenbaum, another
Jew, is not satisfied with the Brady Law, and wants to impose
even more stringent gun controls. The new law he is proposing
would require the purchase of a federal license for an “arsenal” by
any citizen having more than 1,000 rounds of ammo at home.
Obviously this is an attempt to make criminals out of all those
Americans who strongly believe in the Second Amendment, and
are sufficiently armed to fight a tyrannical government, should
this become necessary. By the way, that is one thing that gets me
about the gun control advocates: their dishonesty regarding the
need for (many) weapons. They always say, “one doesn’t need this
or that weapon for sporting purposes” while defenders of the Sec-
ond Amendment know and claim that this is not the major pur-
pose of (much of) gun ownership. These same ‘liberal” liars are
those who claim that revisionists say that there had been no Ger-
man concentration camps during World War II, something I’ve
never heard or read from anyone on our side.
^ ^ <7* *T'
The following is very important.
GANPAC has changed its (real) title and purpose from a “po-
litical action committee” to a “political affairs committee.” The ac-
ronym GANPAC remains the same. Note the new impressum:
GANPAC is the only organization politically defending and rep-
resenting the interests of the 60 million Americans who have
declared themselves “German-Americans,” this nation’s largest
ethnic group. It is GANPAC’s aim to fight the constant defama-
tion of all things German by the American newsmedia, to inform
the American public of the great contributions by the German-
Americans and Germans to the growth and well-being of this
16 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
nation, and to help build a better society for all.
The GANPAC BRIEF appears monthly. Subscription/donation
rates are $50 per annum ($25 for students and Social Security
recipients — U.S. addresses only.) Back issues are available.
Write for list.
©German-American National Political Affairs Committee,
P.O. Box 11124, Pensacola FL 32524-1124.
What led to this change? You may remember that PACs are
under the supervision of the FEC, the Federal Election Commis-
sion, and that all PAC’s have to mail frequent (at least twice a
year but more often in election years) financial reports to that
office. In these reports we have to list all those contributors and
additional information on them who give more than $200 a
year. Suddenly, these requirements were strengthened, and I
have a hunch that the real aim of these new regulations is to
(eventually, soon) encompass all contributors, no matter how
small their checks. The Jewish overlords never miss a beat
when broadening their influence, and widening their (ADL-
like) “supervision.” They’d love to get the names, addresses,
employers, etc., of all American and German patriots into their
supercomputers.
At any rate, when a PAC receives more than $200 a year from
someone, ‘best efforts” have now to be made to get certain infor-
mation from these individuals, and the following has to be stated
in a letter to them: ‘Federal law requires political committees to re-
port the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer
for each individual whose contributions aggregate in excess of $200
in a calender year.” Reading this, and knowing how the U.S. gov-
ernment sometimes passes retroactive laws, we at GANPAC real-
ized that we had to take some measures to safeguard our
contributors (almost all of whom contribute less than the amount
in question per annum) . And, really, the only way to do this was
to alter the constitution of our organization so that it does not fall
under FEC jurisdiction. Is there a drawback in all of this? Nothing
of importance. We must realize that, due to various factors (some
mentioned in last month’s BRIEF), GANPAC was never able to
reach the bulk of German-Americans, and thi s obviously cur-
Liberty Bell / June 1994— 17
tailed our fundraising activities, as well as our intention to sup-
port candidates worthy of our sympathies. Due to this fact our
greatest success stories lie in another field; a field wherein we
intend to remain for many years to come, namely, “to set the
record straight.” Your comment is invited.
Clinton: Currently I am of the opinion that Bill and Hillary
will not finish their second year in office. ‘They” (whoever that
is) will not let up on the Whitewater affair. Instead, ever new
revelations will be broadcast that will shake this Presidency.
Clinton’s assertion that “the American people” wanted him in
office, is obvious nonsense. 23% of the eligible voters (many of
them illiterates) do not constitute the people. If Clinton gets
pushed out of office, we must regard him as a victim of the in-
fighting amongst our international enemies.
May I suggest that you just write GANPAC or “German-
American” on the checks with your subscriptions and/or contri-
butions. I really appreciate all your support. Remember, we
(GANPAC) did contribute much to blow the lid off the Holo-
. caust myth. YOU helped us fight for the truth. Thank you.
Sincerely, Hans Schmidt
From GANPAC BRIEF Ho. 139/May 1994
Box 11124, Pensacola FL 32524-1124
BOOK REVIEW
by
Charles E. Weber, Ph.D.
Deborah Lipstadt
Denying the Holocaust / The Growing Assault on Truth
and Memory
New York: The Free Press, 1993. ix + 278 pages.
During the past few years a number of facts have come to
light which have seryed to clarify the question of the ‘Holo-
caust” claims that have played an important role in shaping
American foreign policy, especially in the Middle East and per-
haps to a lesser extent with regard to the lands which tried at
great sacrifice and with heroism to block the Communist tide
into Western Europe during 1941 to 1945. The death records
of Auschwitz have been released, detailed analyses have been
published of the American aerial photographs made of Ausch-
witz during 1944, a forensic analysis of the surface stonework
of walls of alleged lethal gas chambers has been undertaken
by a courageous American expert on penal execution proce-
dures and the supreme court of Israel has discredited the testi-
mony of a considerable Number of witnesses who claimed that
the American citizen John Demjanjuk was a certain concentra-
tion camp guard. American citizens are being taxed to pay for
the United States Holocaust Memorial museum recently
opened in Washington. Advertisements in important university
campus newspapers (e.g., of Cornell, Duke, University of Geor-
gia, University of Illinois, Louisiana State University, Univer-
sity of Michigan, Ohio State University, Rutgers and
Vanderbilt) have brought up the need for public, open debate
on the ‘Holocaust” question. These and other developments
have caused a reevaluation of the ‘Holocaust” claims in broad
sections of the American public and even in academic circles.
(A large number of revisionists of the “Holocaust” material
have advanced degrees in such diverse subjects as history and
chemistry.)
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 19
It is consequently not astonishing that those who have sup-
ported the Extermination Thesis over the years have become
embarrassed or even panic-stricken. Professor Lipstadt, who
occupies the Dorot Chair in Modern Jewish and Holocaust
Studies at Emory University, expresses her panic in the open-
ing paragraphs of her preface: “When I first began studying
Holocaust denial, people would stare at me strangely
That situation has changed dramatically. Regrettably, I no
longer have to convince others of the relevance of this work.”
She is especially disturbed (page 208) by the advertisements
that have appeared in campus newspapers that appeal for
open debate on the ‘Holocaust” material. In some senses, her
panic is justified. Such well-known historians as David Irviiig
have even begun to question the wisdom of England’s ever
having declared war on Germany (page 8) and have attacked
the character and motivations of Winston Churchill. (See New
York Times Book Review, 29 August 1993, page 3.)
As a result of pressure from well-funded and politically
powerful Jewish organizations a number of governments, even
including those in Bonn and Vienna, which purport to repre-
sent the German people, have taken strong measures to pre-
vent any discussion in public which questions the validity of
the ‘Holocaust” claims. In 1985 and 1988 Canada conducted
trials on a preposterous legal basis against a German citizen
residing in Canada just for having published a small book that
raised questions about the ‘Holocaust” material. Fortunately,
reason finally prevailed and the defendant, Ernst Zundel, was
exonerated by the Canadian supreme court. By the way, such
desperate measures by those who have a vested interest in up-
holding the Extermination Thesis serve to publicize the tre-
mendous political power and financial resources of Jewish
organizations. They also call attention to the importance at-
tached to the Extermination Thesis by Jews and their lackeys
in the press and the electronic media.
Lipstadt repeatedly asserts that those who contest (“deny”)
the ‘Holocaust” material do so because they have some sort of
plan to revive National Socialism or Fascism. Perhaps that is
20 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
true in the case of a few individuals, but in the case of most re-
visionists I have known— and I have known many of them—
the motivations for contesting the ‘Holocaust” material are far
simpler. People of German descent are angered by the ‘Holo-
caust” material because it puts them at social and even eco-
nomic disadvantages. Lipstadt also equates casting doubts on
the ‘Holocaust” material with anti-Semitism. Actually, revi-
sionists have a wide range of attitudes toward Jews. Most of
them, however, are probably uneasy about the huge sums paid
to the Jewish state in Palestine which American and German
taxpayers are forced to pay and most of them no doubt resent
the anti-Aryan role of the Jews in the media, especially in tele-
vision. Does that constitute an irrational, unreasonable hostil-
ity toward Jews (“anti-Semitism”? At various places in the
book Lipstadt expresses concern about the putative successes
of those who cast doubts about the ‘Holocaust material. As an
author who has written a good many pages on the Extermina-
tion Thesis (even including a review that appeared in the very
first issue of the Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1980) I
can assure Prof. Lipstadt that the advocates of the Extermina-
tion Thesis have some overwhelming advantages, such as the
role of the media, especially the television networks largely
controlled by Jews in the United States, as has been well docu-
mented. I recall that no less than $140,000,000 was expended
in the production of the lavish television series, War and Re-
membrance. The financial resources of those who contest the
Extermination Thesis are very small compared to the almost
unlimited resources of its advocates, even including the re-
sources of the federal government, which has given heavy fi-
nancial aid to the advocates of the Extermination Thesis,
including the lavish expenditures for the Holocaust Memorial
Museum in Washington. There are a number of reasons why
many Americans do not want to hear doubts about the Exter-
mination Thesis. We fought a long, cruel and expensive war
against National Socialist Germany, a war which many Ameri-
cans would like to remember as a “good war” in spite of its dis-
astrous results, the enslavement of half of Europe by the
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 21
1
Communist tyranny and the expenses of the “Cold War/’ in-
cluding our painful experiences in Korea and Vietnam. Many
Americans have a psychological compulsion to believe that Na-
tional Socialist Germany was even more evil than the Soviet
Union with which we allied ourselves. (Lipstadt, to her credit,
acknowledges that Stalin killed more people than the Nazis,
page 213.)
The first and longest chapter in the book (“Canaries in the
Mine,” pages 1-29) surveys diverse manifestations of “Holo-
caust denial” in various parts of the world, even including Ja-
pan and Brazil. Chapters Two (pages 31-47), Three (pages
49-64) Four (pages 65-83) and Five (pages 85-102) are de-
voted to the early history of revision of the Holocaust” mate-
rial. Pages 85-102 are devoted to the pioneer in the field, the
late Prof. Austin J. App. Later chapters focus on Richard Har-
wood (Richard Verall), Arthur Butz, Willis Carto, Ernst Zun-
del, Fred Leuchter and Bradley Smith. Even President Reagan
is reproached for one of the most decent things he did while in
office (page 210). David Irving is characterized (page 181) as
“one of the most dangerous spokespersons for Holocaust de-
nial.”
In no less than three places (pages 44, 86 and 97) Lipstadt
claims that the genocidal Morgenthau Plan was never put into
effect. This is not exactly true or true only to a limited extent,
as anyone knows who lived in Germany during 1945-1948, as
I did when I was involved in ‘Denazification” and translating
historical materials. Without an industry to produce export-
able goods Germany would starve. As a matter of fact, Ger-
many underwent a considerable deprivation of its industry
after the war in various ways. Not only were German factories
dismantled and sent to the U.S.S.R., but German patents were
confiscated and the German economy was largely paralyzed by
a lack of a currency reform and prices and wages controlled at
such levels that there was little incentive for production which
conformed to the law. After all, one of the chief incentives that
England had for declaring war on Germany on 3 September
1939 was to keep German goods out of world export trade at
22 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
a time when unemployment was a desperate problem. The
Morgenthau Plan was genocidal in nature because Germany
had long been dependent on imports of grain and other food-
stuffs to make up for the limits of its agricultural capacity in
relation to its population, which had grown rapidly in the
nineteenth century. Even the Germany of 1937 had an area
only roughly comparable to that of the state of Texas. An im-
portant aspect of the Morgenthau Plan lies in the fact that it
became known to the German government after it was in-
itialed by Roosevelt in September 1944. It, along with the de-
mand for unconditional surrender, stiffened German
resistance. Also known to the German government was the
proposal by T. Kaufman that all Germans in their reproductive
years be sterilized, a proposal put forth as early as 1941 in the
little book, Germany Must Perish [available from LBP, $4.50 +
$1,50 postage], another genocidal threat against Germany,
not mentioned by Lipstadt, of course.
A whole chapter is devoted to the Institute of Historical
Review (pages 1 137-156) without a mention of the very de-
structive arson attack against the Institute in 1984. Nor can
mention be found of the attack against Prof. Faurisson which
nearly cost him his life. Lipstadt has good reason for not men-
tioning these violent crimes because the y vividly demonstrate
the bankruptcy of the Holocaust” material, most of whose ad-
vocates refuse to debate the Extermination Thesis in public, in-
cluding Lipstadt.
On page 164 Lipstadt makes an enigmatic observation
about the Protocols of the Elders of Zion: “In fact, when it was
originally published in France in the mid-nineteenth century,
Jews did not appear in the book at all.” Actually it seems prob-
able that the Protocols [available from LBP, $4.00 / $9.00 +
$1.50 postage] were inspired by Hermann Goedsche’s “Auf
dem Judenfriedhof in Prag” (1868), a translation of which ap-
peared in the July 1993 issue of the Liberty Bell, a periodical
which has contained many articles on the “Holocaust” ques-
tion, It is not mentioned by Lipstadt. /
Especially damaging to Lipstadt’s credibility is her mention
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 23
f
(page 167) of a report supposedly filed in June 1943 which
claimed that five crematories in Auschwitz would have a 24-
hour capacity of 4,756 bodies. Since there are 1440 minutes in
a day, five units would be operating a total of 7,200, even if in
constant use. Less than two minutes would thus he allowed for
each body. Since a crematory unit requires about two hours to
reduce a body to ashes, Leuchter’s estimate (mentioned by Lip-
stadt) of 156 bodies per diem seems quite reasonable. Such
nonsense in the ‘Holocaust” literature has caused widespread
doubts about its validity in the case of people capable of inde-
pendent thought.
Chapter 10 (pages 183-208), ‘The Battle for the Campus,”
is devoted to the efforts of Bradley Smith, and the Committee
for Open Debate on the Holocaust (C.O.D.O.H.). This commit-
tee has attempted to place large advertisements in various
campus newspapers with a considerable measure of success. A
partial list of universities whose newspapers have accepted or
rejected such advertisements is given in an important footnote
on page 184. Lipstadt goes into great details of the reactions
. to such advertisements and the circumstances of their accep-
tance or rejection as the case might be. In spite of all the 26
pages devoted to such details, the reader is left puzzling as to
just what the advertisement contained, a matter which could
have been easily clarified by reproducing the text of the adver-
tisement, a secret which Lipstadt apparently wants to keep
from her readers for some reason or another. The dust-cover
of the book does give the modest and restrained headline of
one of the versions of the advertisement: ‘THE HOLOCAUST
STORY: How much is false? The Case for Open Debate.” At the
conclusion: of the long chapter Lipstadt admits that she is pes-
simistic about the effects of the advertisement and the effects
of C.O.D.O.H.
Some years ago I had my own astonishing and depressing
experiences with the kind of Zionist influence that has more
recently succeeded in suppressing the advertisements which
Bradley Smith and his C.O.D.O.H. attempted to place in some
campus newspapers. The Winter 1984 issue of the German
24 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
Quarterly, published by the American Association of Teachers
of German, of all organizations, contained an advertisement
for my propaedeutic book. The ‘Holocaust’: 120 Questions and
Answers. This advertisement caused a tremendous flapping of
wings and cackling within the Association, The Spring 1984 is-
sue of the German Quarterly contained letters (pages 361-^
362) of regret about the “advertisement for anti-Semitic'
literature” which got past the Business Manager of the German
Quarterly. The two letters were from Ruth K. Angress, former
editor of the German Quarterly and from Robert A. Grovier, its
Business Manager. The Winter 1985 issue contained (page 91)
an AATG Executive Council resolution about the “inadver-
tently accepted” advertisement and stated: “The AATG Execu-
tive Council categorically repudiates and condemns the
dissemination of material that is anti-Semitic or that can be
construed as an apology for Nazism.” Of course, no proof was
■ offered that my book expressed hostility toward Jews (“anti-
Semitism”). Thus, further advertisements for my book were
prohibited in a journal published by an association of aca-
demic people who have a particular interest in a factual, bal-
anced treatment of the ‘Holocaust” question.
On page 204 Lipstadt mentions “a book charging Gen.
Dwight Eisenhower with consciously causing the death of a
million German POWs at the end of the war." Strangely, Lip-
stadt does not mention the author and tide of the book, James
Banquets Other Losses (1988) [available from LBP at half
price, $12.50 + $2.00 for postage] . Is this just one more secret
which Lipstadt wants to keep from her readers? Is there any-
thing improper about comparing known Allied war crimes
with putative German war crimes?
We note another strange omission in Chapter Ten (‘Watch-
ing on the Rhine," pages 209-222). This chapter is devoted to
the inhibited, pale revisionism of German historians, such as-
that of Hellmut Diwald, whose Geschichte der Deutschen I re-
viewed in the very first issue of the Journal of Historical Re-
view (Spring 1980). By the way, Lipstadt does not eveh
mention the German title of this important book (page 210),
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 25
SO we. must doubt diat she ever read* it or 'that she even knows •
enough German t:o have read it. (She misspells a number of
German words;) Not a single mention is-made of Wilhelm
Staglich’s Der Auschwitz Mythos [available from LBP,- German
laiig-.. edition, pb; $ 13 . 00 4- $1.95 post.. The Auschwitz Myth;
Engl. Edition, hb: (limited stock); $19.50 \+ $3.00 post;] copies
of which were 1 confiscated by 'the Bonn govern rnenf, which
also: deprived Staglich of his doctoral degree, o ri the basis of a
law signed by none other than Adolf Hitler and never repealed
by the Bonn government:'- (Staglich was a judge and his book
presents -important analyses of the evidence pertaining to the
“Holocaust” question.) Lipstadt also ; makes no-mention of an-
other important refutation of the "Holocaust” material by a
German author, Die Auschwitz Liige : [available from EBP/ Ger-
man lang. edition, $7.50 + $1.50 post., Rngl. ’edition] Ausch-
witz: An Eyewitness Report, $3.00 + $1.50 post.] by Thies
Christophersen, who had to flee to Denmark to escape the
harsh measures* of the Bonn government, which has- a 'great
and riot entirely unjustified fear'of a boycott of its -vitally’ im-
portant-export trade: Both of these men were on military duty
in Auschwitz, the latter as 'an agronomist engaged in an at :
tempt to find a plant substitute for -rubber production, one of
the economic projects in which internees at Auschwitz were
involved. Has Lipstadt ever heard of these books? They would
certainly seem like grist for her mill. On page 11 Lipstadt de-
scribed the Austrian- magazine Sieg as a “newspaper;” One
must ask what sort of knowledge, if any, ‘Lipstadt 1 has of Ger-
man publications on a first-hand basis.' ■ c: .: -i.v'; i' driri-v
■’ Lipstadt claims that implementation of the Final- Solution
was worked out at the famous Wannsee Conference in Janu-
ary 1942 (page 214). One must ask: if she ever read the puta-
tive (known- only in one copy) minutes of- the conference,
whicludoes not mention plans for the extermination of the
Jews, ■ and indeed mentions • their eventual release (“by FfeilaS-
sung ! % Wliat, then, was die ‘Final -Solution” to which Lipstadt
alludes? . .:J .‘-cvv r'. ! v-u ';.0v : i. . oit,'!
One must also ask if Lipstadt ever examined the German
26 — Liberty Bell / June 1994 ~
wording of Himmler’s Posen speech of 4 October 1943, parts
of which do not make sense in the circumstances under which
the speech was given. She quotes part of the speech on page
128. (See Staglich, Auschwitz Mythos, pages 91 ff.)
On pages 228-229 Lipstadt discusses gastight doors of gas
chambers. One Jewish source has provided us (perhaps unwit-
tingly) with a picture of such a door. It is clearly inscribed
with a warning about the danger from gas. Obviously, lice can-
not read but human beings can, and such an inscription would
not have been on the door if the chamber were to have been
used to kill people. Some of the best evidence against the
“Holocaust” claims is from Jewish sources!
As an historian who has written many pages that express
my doubts about the “Holocaust” claims, I welcome Prof. Lip-
stadt’s book. Although she very stubbornly adheres to the
usual version of the Extermination Thesis in the face of mount-
ing evidence against them, she does mention revisionists’ argu-
ments against the Extermination Thesis in a number of places
in attempts to refute or deride them, such as the discussion of
the effects of residues of Zyklon-B on pages 224-225. Many a
reader of pages 229 ff. would have remained unaware that
doubts have been cast on the authenticity of Anne Frank’s di-
ary if he had not read these pages.
- Let us hope that Prof. Lipstadt’s book will lead many a
reader to investigate the writings of those who have contested
the “Holocaust” claims. Many a reader of the book will have
been previously unaware that there is another side of the
‘Holocaust” controversy, a side which is never heard on televi-
sion networks in the United States. The book is also an en-
couraging record — albeit a partial one — of the
accomplishments of a small, meagerly financed, idealistic
group of revisionist historians who have worked against over-
whelming odds. □
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 27
Good-bye to the White Tip
by
N.B. Forrest
The news from South Africa is grim. It is now obvious that the
turn to so-called “Majority” rule will end in either a bloodbath
(white blood, that is) or civil war, to be followed by the departure
of the whites or the establishment of a white rump state. The idea
of a “multiracial, multicultural” South Africa was always twaddle,
but now we are beginning to see that ideas do indeed have conse-
quences. The insane idea that a modern industrial state with a
large white population could be peacefully delivered into the
hands of Bantu savages will now be shown to be, beyond a
shadow of a doubt, one of the sickest ideas to come out of our
very sick century.
It is sobering to think that a partitioned mini-state is the best
the whites of South Africa can hope for. Ten years ago white
South Africa stood free and independent, powerful enough to bid
defiance to the Soviet Empire and send its Cuban lackeys running
with their fails between their legs. The so-called black “frontline
states” huffed and puffed about fighting a war to the finish with
the “racist South Africans,” but it was all bluster.
A combination of pressure from abroad and weakness from
within has destroyed that South Africa. As ashamed as I am of our
own country’s complicity in the war against the continent’s White
Tip, the real enemy, as is always the case, came from within. A
seedy collection of Jews, white liberals and Afrikaner turncoats
drove the dagger into the heart of South Africa.
My thoughts and prayers will be with the conservative Afri-
kaners as they struggle to save what they can from the wreckage.
As a student of the Boer War and the Afrikaners’ long racial war
with the Bantu, I am confident that the Afrikaner nation will not
pass from the scene. In all the world there is not a worthier branch
of our race. Only time will tell what form it will take, but some
part of South Africa will remain firmly in the hands of the men
and women who created that unique country.
That said, we must also recognize the inevitable. White rule in
28 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
South Africa as it has existed for centuries will end before this
year is out. What possible benefit can flow from this? Where could
a silver lining lie? As painful as it is to list them, a number of posi-
tive elements can be counted on to result from the coming disaster
in South Africa:
For the first time a modem Western industrial nation will face
total extinction. The gruesome process will be broadcast into
every livingroom in the world. Even Joe Sixpack and the effete,
degenerate plutocrats who rule us will be forced to look up from
their soup bowls. The images that have become familiar to us
from Liberia (Jeeps festooned with body parts parading around
the capital) and Somalia (the mutilation of dead soldiers) will be
branded into the mind of every Westerner who still has a mind.
Within one year, two at the most, planeloads of bedraggled
survivors will begin arriving in London, Paris, Amsterdam and
New York, carrying with them hair-raising stories of murder, rape
and pillage. First-person accounts of a descent into the heart of
darkness. Many of these people will have an “ex” in front of their
names. Ex-Finance Minister, ex-Foreign Minister, ex-Rector of this
or that university, ex-editor of this or that liberal newspaper. They
will all have tousled hair, sunken eyes, haggard jowls and the gen-
eral appearance of persons who have been sitting on a toilet read-
ing the evening news when, inexplicably, they have been sucked
down into the water closet, dragged by an irresistible force
through the sewer pipes and left exhausted and despairing on the
banks of some horrid cloaca. They will search for sympathy
among their fellow “sheeple” in Western universities, think tanks
and newsrooms, explaining that, although they were the ones who
brought about “majority rule,” by some strange twist of fate and
due to the bad faith' of “right-wingers,” their beautiful vision of
South Africa had collapsed into a nightmare. Smugly sure of their
reception, they will be pained and alarmed to see that their weak-
ness and betrayal of their own people in favor of dark-skinned
barbarians have earned them no points with the powers-that-be in
the West. Shunned and cast out into outer darkness, the dolts will
never understand why. The why is simple. The swine in the West
who leaned on these fools to sell out their country knew damn
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 29
Well what the end result would be. Having done their dirty work,
the swine will not want these living witnesses to the catastrophe
to hang around. Don’t be a stranger, de Klerk. Drop by sometime
for a drink.
The dark and threatening differences between modem West-
ern man and black African proto-humanoids will become star-
dingly clear to even the most lobotomized couch potatoes. When
the new ‘leaders” of South Africa drop the mask, and their canni-
bal souls (such as they are) crawl to the surface, we will all have
the pleasing experience of seeing ‘heroes” transformed into crea-
tures out of The Night of the Living Dead. Saint Nelson Mandela
will appear in a different light when he is up on a platform in
front of a shrieking mob, munching on a freshly excised piece of
human liver, borrowed from the supine corpse of some unfortu-
nate “political rival.”
Since South Africa was the economic engine that kept a large
part of Black Africa in business, a rapid slide into economic de-
pression is likely. The resulting chaos may be hard to detect, since
Black Africa has been tumbling into the pit since the colonial mas-
ters left. It will show up, however, in a fairly quick breakdown in
whatever public health services still manage to function in that
v
part of the world.
Millions of whites will soon either be dead or out of South Af-
rica. For the most part these will be intelligent, educated people
who have seen their country crumble before their eyes. They
should be welcomed with open arms.
The looming disaster in South Africa will thoroughly discredit
the multicultural drivel being spooned down our throats. Even the
dumb oxen among our leaders will be able to see that “multicultu-
ralism” is a recipe for human train wrecks of monstrous propor-
tions.
The fall of South Africa is a terrible event for Western man.
For the first time since the collapse of the Roman Empire, our peo-
ple will be permanently expelled from land that had been wrested
from primitive natives and formed into a white homeland. The
white man has lost much ground since the end of WWII, most of it
in areas where we did not belong and should never have been.
30 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
South Africa is different. It was “Western,” the cradle of a small,
but noble arid tough .white 'nation, i tj \ ' s? i y> ■■ y. : :
Up;
but no one has come
i his ( ha me, ' A ; . ? ■ . 11 ’ 1 A ,• ) . * •' ; •
t , c
•* . v
' HBO and Pepsi have .Vent posters' 16
| 20,000, predominantly black schools that.,
.contain the following doggerel: "We [Ne-
groes]' afe the btiilcters of th^ pyramids; -
look \vhat you hid, y , ,So much, to tell the.
world the truth ho longer hid/" 1 - :
South Africa. There is something tragi- , ... , .. - The Jewishness of Vladimir Zhirinov-
cally prophetic about the TV and 'phpt^/’Z' % V} , ’ ; ^Ky' haVbeOh pretty well confirmed by the
graphic coverage of those three South Af- . „ discovery of his birth certificate. It shows
rican white separatists who went to Bop- : , ' v that his original name, until he changed it
huthatswana to help it remain a black'/;;:' ,-VWaft (age 18, was Eidelshtein. His mother
An-
. . Volf
. . <ii >biMwidnt6iii» ■ Zhirinovsky v/as.
W:- V •'•►*,'**= Amyn Apijii 2S> 1946, .18 monlhs: after,
crept 'out of Ihe'car ‘ oftto the'grtiW. •••' the'tfestlr oHls 1 mother's ftiil husband
Turnmg (he remand redder- as they bled, .Land live months after she married her soc-
nospjtal. y\s ... . , ond. husband, presumably Zhirinovsky's
the- videotapes -whirled" ‘and. Cameras ' father. Thfere could- have boor, anofhV
clicked, . a black .polieeman calmly y/enj ..... ^.man between, times when Mrs, Zhirinov-
over and executed the two whites with ■' ’ "sky was a wjclpw, \ ‘ . - • .
three-shots each fo their, heads. The' white \ : ,
reporters .and photographers who were re-v. • ;
Cording this eVent did nothing toVfoja thb ! ‘ ,,v
mur'ddr . of,; their /acial ;kin. is. this .same «,-•
scenario, expanded a million tirnes, going
to belthe, l fate ; of all South African whites? - ! I
In 1 another 59 or,100,ye^rs,.w.i[l it be the ,
fate of all 'American whites? As subscriber ‘ ''
Zip 913 wrote, "Those photos radicalized *n • • * ?. . ,
me more than reading a, hundred issues of. . , The Myers Park Presbyterian Church
■ inMauratiori.'Thei-eMs no quarter in a race.'’ *•/ 1 " A '° CnaH6ttei.(NG),dnvited' members' of its
vyaf, .v'Our Jenemies^-jews,; bfacks arid/. .'.A ’ ! })' ^8f e g a f!on to. participate in a; S^der ...
white ; rehegades — want us all deadf If Meal on March 29. "Come ceiebtate the
sdmeohe' calls' me a ; racist, my rep ly is; : V ' ••• Plover, ,fe^st «nd learn about. q.ur deep
TOTALLY * . • A .. r . ' ?, 4 Christian roots In the Jewish tradition*
- I. Z This feastbelebrates the liberation of our’!'
i-- ' . ." ' Hebrew ancestors from slavery in Egypt," ,
WMl ' v CTh'e italics are the editpds.)
Janet Reno, whose mother is an hono-
i! • frary. princess of the (Mlccosukee 'Indians,
......recently attended a Jewish art .exhibit in . .
f ' Florida where she was kidded that the '
; , \ ■ } ’ Miccosukees may ; have beep one qf the; : ;.
■ Jost tribes, Reno y/asnT kidding back
'• *■ : ^ 4 when 'she Went out ' of her Way to 1 pra l^e ’
A , , ;J e V<s fpr. building ."Vjiami ; Beach put • of ...
nothing/ Some ndn-jews 'after a Visit to "
V ]i 1 ; y Miami Beach -might. say Jews made worse. ■ /
than nothing out of nothing.
V- . ; f ■
ijF 1 ’) \i, .';i . /he re^l. ; pame of Phranc>. .the ( ,self 7; ,•
. " designated ‘ all-American Jewish 1 lesbian
p /On€ $qcond before the black racist V/ k r , K : ' folk; singer, is Susan GoUliebi Qne .of her
. executed the last of the three whites. - "hit" songs is Take Off Your Swastika ,
Z ‘ ' ''n ••• .• -r c v ./n,;: T
t ■
,;.>i
: : 1. .' -i
- >, , V I' ) .
I
■\ > v
1
. ;*
•' :r ,
,‘v
From Instauration, May 1 9^4, published by-
; . ...Howard Allen Enterprises, Box 76
?• ■u.,y < .h: ■ Cape Canaveral FL 32920.
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 37
This is Your Brain On
Television
by
Tyler C . Turner
Today, individuals spend an average of at least eight hours a
week watching television. But, before televison was invented,
books were the best form of entertainment available. Now that
watching television has displaced reading, we must observe the
dire effects of this action. The era when books and stories were the
primary form of entertainment had many advantages that the era
of television either lacks or indirectly destroys. Reading not only
provided the people in past , ages with entertainment, but it also
stimulated their imagination, appealed to their intellect, and in-
stilled moral values. Television, on the other hand, stagnates
ima gination, appeals to base emotions, and undermines our soci-
ety’s moral fiber.
One of the advantages reading has over television is that it
stimulates your imagination. For example, whenever you read a
book, you must use your imagination to envision what is taking
place or being presented. Even when reading about science or
mathematics, you must employ you imagination in order to com-
prehend the abstract ideas presented. Similarly, in reading stories
you must use your imagination to follow the character through his
various adventures. This, in turn, will improve your ability to think
and reason. When thinking and/or reasoning, a well-developed
imagination enables you to visualize all the factors in the delibera-
tions and the solutions or deductions derived thereby. Therefore,
you can readily see the importance of a well-developed imagina-
tion. Reading stimulates the use of your imagination, and as a re-
sult, it gives your imagination the opportunity to develop.
Watching television, on the other hand, hinders this develop-
,ment. Moreover, television stagnates your imagination. Everything
you see on television is spoon-fed to you. When watching a movie,
for instance, you view the character and his surroundings on a
screen. You follow all his adventures on the screen rather than in
your mind. In fact, you don’t use your imagination at all. Even
32 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
when you’re watching the news, the information presented by-
passes your' imagination.* Thus, while television is manipulating
your thoughts and emotions, your imagination stagnates. The old
saying, “if you don’t use it, you lose it!” applies here as it does any-
where. You can draw your own conclusions from the facts pre-
sented, but when your imagination deteriorates, or doesn’t have
the opportunity to properly develop, your ability to think and rea-
son will also deteriorate.
i' ' • t
In the era when reading was the prevalent means of entertain-
ment; the people then had a well-developed imagination. In addi-
tion,. the books and stories produced appealed to the peoples’
intellect. The writers utilized witty aphorisms, and alluded to ear-
lier works that had the effect of forcing serious thought out of the
reader. Hence, only the most learned and intelligent people could
really appreciate their value. Furthermore, the books and stories
these writers created became a cultural expression, and the intelli-
gentsia of a society are the epitome of that society’s culture. Nearly all
the books and stories composed back then appealed to the intellect,
and, therefore; were directed towards the intelligentsia.
i ;
In contrast, television is aimed at the masses. And, as a result,
it appeals to peoples’ emotions rather than their intellect. When
you watch television, you aren’t forced to think. The colors, ac-
tions, and words are designed to provoke common emotions. Tele-
vision prograhis may entice a variety of sensual feelings, but they
will seldom ever compel thought. The masses in general have a
very low intellect. Therefore, since television is aimed at the
masses, it can only appeal to base emotions, rather than intellect.
But in the era of their prevalence, books and stories not only
appealed to peoples’ intellect, they also instilled the reader with
*At this point, I’d like to bring to your attention a valuable facility of
imagination. As you are reading, your mind forms an image of what is be-
ing presented. Therefore, if your imagination perceives something illogical
Or absurd in that image, it will automatically dismiss it as such. But when
you bypass your imagination, something that would normally seem illogi-
cal or absurd enters into your mind as being somehow relevant. And as a
result, your reasoning will become utterly confused; you will never per-
ceive a cogent image of what entered your brain with so many absurd no-
tions floating around in your mind.
i
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 33
. ■ ' V
JEWISH
CLAPTRAP
morals and values. For instance. I’ll never forget what Hector did
in The flliad. when he was faced with going back into batde or stay-
ing at home with his wife and son. He exemplified a man with the
courage to fulfill his true duty. He knew that he would probably die
in battle against Achilles, but he had the courage to turn from the en-
treaties of his wife, and face the enemy of his country. Just this one
story instilled me with a sense of loyalty, courage, and duty.
Television, however, rather than instilling morals and values,
strives to undermine them The reason for this is beyond the scope of
this article, but the fact that television undermines our traditional mor-
als and values is undeniable. For example, just watch one program
on any night of the week, and you will see most of our traditional
morals undermined and ridiculed. It may not be manifest; but even
in subtle instances you will see honest people portrayed as stupid or
gullible. In another program, you may find homosexuals characterized
as normal people with just a “different sexual orientation” rather
than the sick, degenerate creatures they really are. Change the
channel, and you will find another program that portrays miscege-
nation as something that a healthy society should condone rather
than deplore. Television is undermining all our traditional morals
and values, and what is worse, it has a tendency to applaud overt
immorality.
The books and stories of old provided us with many advan-
tages besides entertainment. Thus, while we were reading about
the war between the Trojans and the Greeks, or Njal’s house being
burned to the ground, we were also developing our imagination,
and thereby improving our ability to think and reason. Moreover,
we were being instilled with a sense of honesty, courage, loyalty,
34 — Liberty Bell /June 1994
and many other invaluable virtues. But television, on the other
hand, is incessantly destroying our imagination and undermining
our morals. Take note, however, that I’m not suggesting we should
regress back in time (even if this were possible) when there wasn’t
any television. Television is here, and here to stay. But even so,
television doesn’t have to be such a bad thing. On the contrary, it
could be adopted to rekindle the fire of our traditional morals and
appeal to our intellect. If television were directed towards the in-
telligentsia, and viewed only in moderation, it could become a real
asset to our society. But, because of the programs currently pre-
sented and the amount of time most people spend watching it,
television will eventually transform our society into a colony of de-
riioralized, degenerate, and mindless drones. □
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 35
.’S'
^ IN THE 1
BEGINNING OF A
CHANGE, THE
PATRIOT IS A
SCARCE MAN AND
BRAVE, HATED, AND
SCORNED. WHEN HIS
CAUSE SUCCEEDS
HOWEVER, THE
TIMID JOIN HIM, FOR
THEN IT COSTS
NOTHING TO BE A
PATRIOT.
Mark Twain
36 — Liberty Bell /June 1994
NATIONAL SOCIALISM:
A Philosophical Appraisal
by
Colin Jordan, England
Twenty-one years after the physical defeat of National So-
cialist Germany in the outcome of her heroic struggle against
the overwhelming array of men and materials marshaled
against her by the Bolshevist-democratic alliance, the appear-
ance of this journal in 1966 reflects that revival of National So-
cialism which is a feature of the day.
That the creed should live on and manifest itself as it does
now, after being subjected to two decades of the greatest cam-
paign of defamation which the world has ever known, is a proof
of its continuing validity and appeal and its worthiness for the
future. It has survived the
flames of war and the
tempest of vilification be-
cause, when war has done
its worst and vilification
has run its entire gamut,
National Socialism re-
mains, in the final analy-
sis, synonymous with
higher man’s will to sur-
vive, his instinct for health
and strength, and his de-
sire for beauty in life; and,
as long as that will, that
instinct, and that desire re-
main on this earth, the
creed of National Social-
ism will remain, indestruc-
tible.
Beyond and behind
all the minutae of political implementation and the particulari-
ties of time and place. National Socialism, properly understood.
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 37
I
is nothing less than an orientation of the mind, the dominant
impulse of which is to live to the full, through the development
of one’s potentialities and the satisfaction of one’s needs, under
conditions of natural competition and selection, reconciled to
cooperation, within the organized community of the folk.
In this its roots go back to Plato’s Greece and his conception of
a natural life, consisting in the full realization of man’s true nature
through the power of government within his native community.
It echoes the Roman notion of dutiful citizenship: the notion
that the good and noble life consists in Stoic service to the state.
It revives the blood feelings and sense of community of the
Nordic tribes of early Europe: the feeling that man is essentially
a member of the folk, and that all members of the folk are
bound together closely with reciprocal duties and obligations.
National Socialism, in this way, reaches back to the old,
healthy, organic values of life in revolt against the whole struc-
ture of thought of liberalism and democracy, with its cash
nexus; its excessive individualism; its view of man as a folkless,
interchangeable unit of world population; its spiritual justifica-
tion in a debased Christianity embracing a sickly ‘humanitarian-
ism,” which will always tolerate a greater harm for the sake of
avoiding a lesser one; and its fraudulent contention that the ar-
AMERICANA
Swastikas symbolized good luck in 1908 presi-
dential election between William Howard Taft
and William Jennings Bryan.
tificially induced and numerically determined wishes of the
mass are the all-important criteria.
History is a saga of social decay and renewal. National So-
cialism is the twentieth century’s remedy of renewal for the
great degeneration of modem times under the disintegrating,
debasing, and emasculating thought and practice which
emerged with the dismption of the old medieval order of stabil-
ity by the developing forces of capitalism and the industrial
revolution; flourished under the laissez-faire liberalism of the
eighteenth and nineteenth centuries; came to a climax under
the democracy of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries; and
will result in the world triumph of communism by the end of
this twentieth century unless National- Socialism comes to power
in time, over a sufficient area of the globe.
National Socialism, therefore, is immensely more than a transi-
tory political scheme. It is a historic tendency of rebirth: our age’s
movement of renaissance, a movement revolutionary in scope and
spirit, seeking no compromise with the present order, its perni-
cious practices, and its false values, but their complete replace-
ment.
As such it is worldwide, and it is life-wide. It is worldwide in
that, in its essentials, it is valid and vital universally, qualified
only by the fact that it is Aryan in emanation and tradition, and
upholds and depends on qualities to be found par excellence in
the Aryan people.
It is life- wide in that it is not an aspect of life, but the whole
of life seen from one aspect. It is an attitude of mind expressible
in respect of virtually anything and everything. National Social-
ism stands relentlessly opposed to every manifestation of ill
health, ugliness, and degeneracy in the cultural and spiritual, no
less than in the political and economic spheres. In fact, it consti-
tutes a way of life. A man does not call himself a National So-
cialist as a mere label of intellectual endorsement. He is born
with a propensity to National Socialism, his mind aesthetically
craving the discernment and fulfillment of a healthy pattern of
life, and he not only thinks and feels, but acts as a National So-
cialist, if he is really and entirely one.
\
38 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 39
Total in its scope of thought, National Socialism amounts to a
philosophy and a faith. It evaluates good and bad, right and wrong,
as that which benefits or harms the folk, and man viewed as a mem-
ber of the folk; and, in place of the sentimental debility of the
democratic mind, accepts that the end justifies the means, pro-
viding the means do not contradict the end. It sets a meaning
and purpose of cosmic dimension to life as a personal fulfill-
ment, within the continuity and development of the folk, be-
tween germination in the womb out of the bloodline of the folk,
and the metamorphosis of the grave, with its physical redistribu-
tion to the universe.
The basic criterion and primary value of National Socialism,
from which all else springs, is, as Adolf Hitler makes clear in
Mein Kampf, its concept of the folk, seen as man’s essential envi-
ronment and, indeed, his extension of personality.
The significance of the folk is, primarily, that of a racial
community. It is the ethnical enlargement of the family. Man is
not a self-contained unit and an end in himself, as the sages of
liberalism and democracy assert. He belongs to his folk. His life,
as a part, is interwoven with the life of the whole, not only pre-
sent, but past and future, for while men come and go the folk
lives on, continuous, eternal, providing its members perform
their duty to it. Thus, in identifying himself with his folk, man
prolongs himself through the multiplicity of his ancestors and
his descendants, and thereby attains immortality.
The folk exists in smaller and larger forms, ranging from the
family, to the clan, to the tribe or regional community, thence to
the nation, and beyond to the race. In modern times, the con-
ception of the folk has become too largely identified with the
nations of the contemporary states. The feeling of kinship and
community, which rightly expanded from the tribe and petty
kingdom to the modern nation-state, has, however, become far
too concentrated as this level. The lower and smaller, but
equally important, communities within the nation-state have
been disrupted and deprived of vitality, while the expansion of
folk consciousness from the level of the nation-state to that of
the entire race has been checked. Yet folk feeling, to be whole-
somely potent, must flow from its roots through the local and
provincial communities to the limits of the race, because the full
security and prosperity of the parts can only be found in that of
the whole.
Today and in the future. National Socialism must embody
this essential extension of the feeling of kinship and community
beyond the bounds of the contemporary nation-state and con-
ventional nationalism, so that the nation-state becomes an inter-
mediate unit in the structure of the folk, and its nationalism and
racialism become integrally subordinate to a nationalism of the
whole race.
At the same time, the local communities require to be re-
vived, the provincial sub-nations recognized and respected, and
peoples subject to an undesired, alien rule given their ethnic
freedom by separation.
National Socialism’s belief in the folk as the basic value, and
its totality of outlook, result, figuratively speaking, in thinking
with the blood on all questions.
This immediately and inevitably gives rise to the definition
of citizenship as a matter of race: only those who are members
of the folk are members of the nation, and only those who are
members of the nation can be citizens of the state— to para-
phrase the fourth of the Twenty-five Points of Adolf Hitler’s
NSDAP.
It also generates the belief that it is necessary not merely to
preserve the racial character of the folk, but also, by eugenic
measures, to improve the quality of the folk. It is National So-
cialism’s revolutionary contention that the way of real progress
lies in breeding better human beings.
Since all citizens are of the same race, they have a transcen-
dent bond of kinship uniting them as blood brothers above all
sectional and class differences and personal distinctions. Na-
tional unity, i.e., cohesion and corporate life in place of the class
warfare of Left and Right, is one of the great secondary princi-
ples of National Socialism. All occupations and pursuits, all
manner of persons and all fields of activity, must be integrated
into the corporate life of the community.
40 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
Liberty Bell /June 1994 — 41
The social feeling of oneness must find practical expression
in, and in turn be stimulated by, a sincere and profound concern
for social and economic justice. Consciousness of kinship and
care for the collective good of the folk demand that every citizen
must have an equal opportunity to develop and exercise his tal-
ents and rise according to his merits; and that every citizen must
receive a fair return for his services to the community, and even
the simplest worker an assurance of the necessities of life.
Thus we arrive at the socialist element in National Social-
ism. This is not the Marxist socialism of state ownership of the
means of production and distribution, which is the economic
Suggested literature:
Mein Kampf, pb., $15.00 + $2.25; hb., $20.00 + $3.00; Germ. lang.
edition, hb., $40.00 + $6.00. - The Testament of Adolf Hitler, $5.00 +
$1 .50. - Adolf Hitler: A Short Sketch of His Life, pb., $5.00 + $1 .50. -
The Programme of the NSDAP, $5.00 + $1 .50. - A Straight Look at
the Third Reich, by the late Prof. Austin J. App, $4.50 + $1 .50. - Hitler
Speaks to America, $3.00 + $1.50. - The Hitler We Loved and Why,
$8.00 + $1 .50 - Hitler, the Workless and the Needy, $3.00 + $1 .50. -
Lincoln Rockwell Nails the Jews, $2.00 + $1.50. - A Revolution in
Thought, Dr. Otto Dietrich, $3.00 + $1.50. - Germany Declares for
Peace, $3.50 + $1 .50. - What the Socialism [as in National Socialism]
Really Means, $.300 + $1.50. - Exchange of Communications Be-
tween the President of the United States and the Chancellor of the
German Reich, April 1939, $3.50 + $1 .50. - Bolshevism in Theory and
Practice, Dr. Jos, Goebbels, $3.00 + $1.50. - Communism With the
Mask Off, Dr. Jos. Goebbels, $3.50 + $1 .50. - They Call it Democ-
racy: We Call it a Racket, John Tyndall, $3.50 + $1.50. - The
March Up Country, H.A. Covington, $8.00 + $1.50. For our latest
Book / Price List, please send $1.00 to:
Liberty Bell Publications. Box 21. Reedy WV 25270. TJ.SA.
Organizations / Publications:
National Alliance, P.O. Box 330, Rte 39, Hillsboro WV 24946. -
N.S.W.P.P., c/o Dixie Press, Box 608, Raleigh NC 27602-0608. -
N.S.D:A.P.-A.O., Box 6414, Lincoln NE 68506. - NS Vanguard, Box
328, The Dalles OR 97058. - Aryan Nations, Box 363, Hayden Lake
ID 83825. - Euro-American Alliance, Box 2-1776, Milwaukee Wl
53221 . - NS Publications, Box 27486, Milwaukee Wl 53227. When writ-
ing to these organizations, Include $2.00 for an introductory packet,
over-government of the ant heap, and as objectionable as the
predatory individualism of the capitalist system, which is the
economic under-government, or anarchy, of the jungle. Instead,
it is Folk Socialism, or the regulation of private enterprise for
the equitable division of its fruits, under equitable conditions.
The economic injustices and social evils of capitalism have fos-
tered Marxism, with its pernicious form of public control of the
economy, and the alternative to both lies in National Socialism.
The folk ideal, which entails the defense of the race, the
unity of the nation, and the welfare of the people, engenders
National Socialism’s principle of leadership and an elite in the
service of those objectives. Its conception of a natural order is
one which not only ordains that men are bom into the folk for a
life within the folk, but also that they possess hereditary differ-
ences of capacity to serve the community.
Accordingly, for the maximum good of all, the superior must
lead the inferior. The natural leaders must be selected, estab-
lished as a hierarchic elite under a supreme leader, and empow-
ered to fulfill their functions.
Unlike liberalism, National Socialism does not regard the di-
rective power of the state as something essentially repressive,
but instead as a great, beneficial power of guidance and arbitra-
tion, encouragement and protection. It upholds the dictum: “All
for the folk and the folk for all.” It sanctions whatever means are
necessary, in whatever fields, to ensure that everyone and
everything in die community is in harmony with this.
It sees the duty of National Socialist government as the repre-
sentation of the will of the folk, conceived not as the transitory
whim of some democratic mob, but as the higher interest of the
community, viewed in historical perspective as a continuity of pur-
pose, embracing not only the general good of the present, but the
heritage of the past and the needs of the future as well.
Reprinted from National Socialist World No, 1, originally published in 1966
by The National Alliance, Dr. William Pierce, Editor,
42 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
Liberty Bell I June 1994 — 43
What is National
Socialism?
National Socialism is a world view for White people, based
on the ideas and concepts of the German racial nationalist phi-
losopher and statesman Adolf Hitler (1889-145). National So-
cialism was adapted to the political and racial conditions of the
United States by the late U.S. Navy Commander George Lincoln
Rockwell (1918-1967).
Owing to the tragic and unnecessary suffering which took
place during the Second World War, and because certain power-
ful elements in our society to this day maintain an interest in
obscuring and concealing the truth, half a century after the
war’s end massive misconceptions still exist in America today
about what National Socialism was and is. The National Social-
ist body of belief is founded on three basic principles:
1. NATURAL ORDER — We believe that the universe is
governed by natural laws. In order for Man to be happy and
successful, he must first learn what these laws are and then fol-
low them. We believe that Man is part of the natural world and
that he is in no way separate or distinct from it Because of this, we
believe that society should be structured in accordance with the
laws of Nature, and not in opposition to them as is the case today.
2 . RACIAL IDEALISM —
Racial idealism is based on the
love of one’s own people. It
means placing the interests and
welfare, of the racial community
to which you belong ahead of
your own personal interests and
desires. As racial idealists we
have no wish to harm, exploit,
or persecute other racial
groups, despite a persistent me-
dia campaign of abuse and de-
liberate falsification to the contrary.
We are only interested in protecting
our own people against extinction, a
fate all too likely if nothing is done
about present conditions in America.
We believe that all men are not
created equal. Just as every individual
has his own strengths and weaknesses,
so each race has certain qualities
which make it different from other
races, We believe that the White (or Aryan) race has the right to
maintain its own biological, cultural and political independence
and integrity, and that we have the right to control our own
destiny. We also believe that the White race has the right to de-
fend itself against all physical, economic, and spiritual attacks,
no matter where they come from.
3. THE UPWARD DEVELOPMENT OF THE WHITE
RACE — We want to do more than just defend our race; we
want to see it improve. This can be done by encouraging a high
birth rate among those sections of the White population which
are the healthiest, strongest, and most intelligent. At the same
time, our science should work to eliminate hereditary weaknesses
and defects among our people. Our goal is that each new genera-
tion of White children will be better than the one before it.
In the United States and Canada, National Socialism is rep-
resented by the NATIONAL SOCIALIST WHITE PEOPLE’S
PARTY, which was originally founded by George Lincoln Rock-
well in 1967 and reconstituted in 1994. The N.S.W.P.P. fights
for the survival of the White race and for true racial justice
through the establishment of a sovereign Aryan Republic on
North American soil. For more information on our organization
and its beliefs, contact us: N.S.W.P.P. Central Support Unit, c/o
Dixie Press, P.O. Box 608, Raleigh, NC 27602-0608, USA. All in-
quiries will be treated in the strictest confidence. □
liberty Befl i June 1994 — 45
. 44 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
Dear George:
I am enclosing $80, for re-
newal of my subscription...
I have been watching this bad
business between the Institute for
Historical Review and the Spot-
light The IHR was doing a good job in blowing up the “Holohoax”
for a while, but it had a wide range of members, and I think it
lacked unity in other fields, such as race, and quite a few more.
I have seen the case put from each side, and I believe I need more
evidence before I make much judgement. However, I did read what
Marcellus had to say in regards to the works of Leon Degrelle, and I
am certainly not inclined to agree with him Members of my family
fought the Germans in both world wars. My father was in France on
the Somme, and saw quite a lot of very hard fighting. My father never
had a hateful word for the German people, or for his “enemy,” the
frontline soldier. I can see now how much of the trouble was caused
by the conniving race, and believe it a tragedy that so many of the
best examples of our race killed each other so unnecessarily. The
world would be a far different place if we had been able to unite, as
we have sometimes done in the past, but this time against the real
and common foe. The immense tragedy of wasted effort is awesome
to contemplate. We need the story of this century to be also told
from the German side. Degrelle, I believe, did a good job with his
Hitler Born at Versailles ; I was looking forward to the rest. The
murders done at Nuremberg are nothing for Americans or British
to be proud of, So many who could have written a history died. The
British did it once before after Waterloo with the execution of Ney,
The bravest of the brave.” I would like to find out what people were
really responsible for THAT decision.
I am still trying to work out what is going on with the IHR
business...
Yours sincerely
D.B., Australia
ee © ©
Dear Mr, Dietz:
I have not taken the time to express my appreciation for the
46 — Liberty Bell /June 1994
work you have done and are doing in producing the Liberty Belt
Thank you and those who write for the Liberty Bell , especially
| Revilo P. Oliver, for a year of history, social commentary and
I wit...
I Best wishes,
I R.P., Oregon
| 80 89 8B
| Dear Mr, Dietz,
k Please renew my subscription...
ii Professor Oliver's prolific accounts of history are always
| worth reading and together with the writings of N. Carter and
•■f Dr. Bentinck your journal has become quite formidable. Philo-
sophically however, greater depth in perception and purpose — *
without coming full circle back to metaphysics- — -would be
■ desirable. The old Hellenes had worked out a concept of what
they call arete, sometimes incorrectly interpreted as simply vrr-
,f tue. In reality it meant much more, a kind of all encompassing
■i wholesomeness and ethical standard for mind and soul, intellect
1 and psyche.
Perhaps someday Dr. Oliver could examine that previous
* \
I subject, that cohesive ingredient of human endeavor, which tran-
scends mere polemics.
Keep up the good fight!
Sincerely,
W.A., New York State
80 © 80
Greetings!
I hope all is well with you. Enclosed is a little contribution..
Again I want to emphasize to you that what makes LB great
is that it tends toward atheism, or at least anti-Christianty. I
threw up reading Bertram Russell when I was about 13 years old
and since then haven't had the burden of religious fallacy to over-
come. Some publications which correctly perceive severe prob-
lems with America (and the world), look utterly foolish when
*
they begin to talk about the Lord Jesus Christ, etc.
Well, take care! Your pal,
T.T., New Jersey
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 47
r
83 S3 ©
Dear Mr. Dietz;
Please find enclosed my renewal pins a modest contribution.
I especially like your current issue, and the articles by Camp-
bell and Vanderpool. I hope to see more material along these
lines, and like the “She Cannot...” that I sent you last fall. Let
IHR make an industry out of ping-ponging the gas chamber story
and give us more of other things.
Thanks very much,
Dr.KN., Utah
© © ©
Dear Editor:
It took about 500 years for the “Master’s Little Darlings” to
corrupt and destroy the Roman Empire. They have done it to us
in a little over 200 years. Of course, the Romans didn’t have zion-
ized movies, television, a phoney banking system, high-tech por-
nography, the Melting Pot, or an overdose of Judeo-Christian
preachers to contend with.
Up until a few weeks ago, when the prospect of caning an
American boy in Singapore came to fight, it was hard to come up
with something that could bring Millions of our Do-Gooders,
whimps, criminals, and most of the 750,000 lawyers and politi-
cians back to reality. For years now, the American people, in
business for themselves, find that it gets harder and harder to
follow the rules in trying to make an honest living, without one of
the arms of BIG GOVERNMENT forcing them into some crimi-
nal activity in order to save his family and business, especially if
he is successful.
This kind of thinking had a lot to do in starting the Civil
War. The Pat Cats in the Ivory Towers in London and New York
couldnt stand to see the Southern Parmer making a good liv in g
on cotton. Not all of the Carpetbaggers left the South after the
war. They made Federal District Judges out ofem, and we have
had our noses dragged through the do-do ever since. Today, our
farmers are making a little money on onions and tobacco, and
they are under attack by the Peds. If they can* t own it or control I
it, they destroy it.
Just watching the caning process in action on every court-
house lawn in the country, 24 hours a days (3 shifts) could help
to save our country. IPs never too late, until we give up our right
to bear arms.
G.T., Georgia
mmm
An Appeal For Help
Many of you who receive this will know who I am Many of you
have met me at some place or another during the past 12 years. The
enclosed letter from my son, Yorie [see note below], is a plea for help
that has been needed but unfulfilled for far too long.
I appreciate the assistance many of you have given over the
years. Unfortunately — and I sorrow to say this- — it has never
been enough. I don't know what will be enough.
If you have even a little faith, it is said that it can move
mountains. The corresponding reality, as I think we all know, is
that "faith without works is dead. 5 Gordon was a man who al-
^ ways applied his work with his faith. He put his life on the line
V for what he believed. He spent virtually every cent he ever had
| beyond the necessities required by his family, attempting to help
j his fellow Americans, and often the family did without for the
greater cause.
’ My son languishes in prison but is guilty of no crime*
He has lost his father, alongside whom he loyally stood for the
cause in which they both believed.
I have concluded that this nation has lost its manhood.
Harry we have witnessed in the murders of Vicki and Sammy
Weaver and the people at Waco is not only tragic, it is inexcus-
able. I understand the suffering of Randy Weaver. Most of you
cannot. That so much injustice and tyranny goes unchallenged is
proof that few real men still live in America.
In the las t several decades America has turned into a waste-
land. Its women are not safe from rape anywhere. Homosexual-
a ity and even bestiality are presented as normal behavior to our
children in grade schools.
I am getting old. My grandchildren have no present let alone
a future. My son is still suffering in prison Although he still tries
48 — Liberty Beil / June 1994
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 49
to pursue justice against many impediments deliberately created
by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to hinder his legal work — he is
alone. He suffers alone, and even if he has to pursue everything
alone, I know he will continue with determination that comes
from a knowledge that he is innocent of the charges placed
against him.
We need help. Not words. No war was ever fought with
words alone, nor will one ever be. I believe Yorie's convictions can
be reversed.
Three high-powered lawyers who have reviewed some of the
issues believe it almost certainly can be done. But — yes, but — the
price is high. Overturning Yorie's convictions won't be easy, but
what we've endured thus far has not been easy either.
I am doing all I can. I'm not young anymore and this is tak-
ing its toll on me. I hope I live long enough to see justice done in
this case. It would be a start towards eliminating the terrible in-
justice that has grown so great in this nation.
Please help us. It's against my nature to beg, but I will if it
would make the difference. Our sincere thanks to those who have
helped and to those who will.
Joan Kahl Britton
3564 Windrift Way #251
Oceanside CA 92056
[For space reasons we cannot reprint the 6-page letter from
Yorie von Kahl (No. 04565-059 (A-3), Box 1000, Leavenworth KS
66048) to his mother, dated May 5, 1994. If you wish to receive
photocopies. Please send $1.00 for postage and copying charges to
LBP, or send donation to Mrs. von Kahl at above address .]
© ffi SB
Dear George:
Most knowledgeable people assumed rightly so that all the
controversy surrounding the Michael Fay caning in Singapore,
was due because of Mr. Fay's part Jewish ancestry.
I really don’t think most white people knew that the kidnap
victim Polly Klass’s mother was a Kikess. Because Polly’s pater-
nal grandparents lived in Monterey, a town nearby, our local pa-
per in an interview brought it out. Since the kid could have been
Anne Frank’s twin sister, I was not surprised. It also, of course,
; exp laine d the intense media interest and outcry of all the politi-
j cians. This fact, as far as I know, never received major media at-
j tentiom In fact, several Bay Area papers printed several articles
I speculating why the people were so aroused by her case.
| In the last 20 years a number of frightful missing children,
I nearly all white, have made headlines of very short duration,
i then down the memory hole. So friends, you no longer have to
S ask, “why Polly Klaas?”
5 For Our Race
; • . C.E.R., California
' i
® CQ CD
a? a?
Dear Mr. Dietz:
The postoffice has just come out with a stamp honoring the
; Buffalo Soldiers. The Buffalo Soldiers were negroes who served
. in the U.S, Army around the turn of the century. The stamp fea-
! tures a heroic figure of a mounted negro firing his rifle in a very
manly fashion. This at a time when our government is doing
L everything it can to disarm Whites.
I Reportedly, negroes were used in the government’s slaughter of
f Whites in the Branch Davidian massacre in Waco.
Can you imagine the postoffice coming out with a stamp hon-
oring the Texas Rangers?!!
Yours truly,
J.McC., Washington
© © ©
Dear George:
Sorry for the delay in getting my subscription renewal in. I had
about decided to let my sub to Liberty Bell lapse since I am getting
married in a few months and Fve been a bit concerned about how
my bride-to-be would take to Revilo P. Oliver (for example). In other
words, she is not a female Lincoln Rockwell (though she can toler-
ate my pagan religious opinions). However, she is chomping at the
1 bit to have kids, which is definitely the important thing [you aren’t
j kidding! — Congratulate your bride-to-be, C.N., on her attitude re
I kids! — G.D.] Hope everything is going well with you and yours.
-i,
'i'
50 — Liberty Bell /June 1994
Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 51
I
Sincerely, C.N., North Carolina
8B: SB .80
, i ■ ■
Our tainted Leaders have just recently installed another
Communist government; this time in South Africa. If you re-
member, they invited Mandela of the A.N.C. to speak before Con-
gress a year or so ago, and with standing ovations, Today these
■ leaders are doing back-flips and hand stands, celebrating their
latest communist victory.
Just before Christmas, in 1913, Congress gave away its Con-
stitutional right to regulate our money system. Four years later,
in 1917, we helped to finance the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia,
where our friends, the Romanov family, were murdered and the
Russian people enslaved. This was the birth of Communism, and
we fought two world wars to keep it alive. We disarmed a Chris-
tian ally in China, Chiang Kai Shek, allowing Mao-Tse-tung to
communize the Chinese mainland, replaced Batista of Cuba with
Fidel Castro, and the list goes on.
We fought two no-win wars in Korea and Vietnam. We were
not allowed to win because they were Communists, so thousands
of our boys were killed and wounded for nothing.
Lies and cover-ups became a way of life with our leaders, and
finally when the word Communism began to have a bad smell,
they changed the name to Democracy. The trouble with that is,
Democracy and Communism is sort of like Republican and
Democrat; there’s not a dime’s worth of difference in the two. We
were founded as a Constitutional Republic. The World War I sol-
diers’ handbook [see "Official Definition of Democracy” reprinted
below; also read, They Call it Democracy:’ We Call it a Racket ,
available from LBP, $3,50 + $1.50 postage] warned the people
about the dangers of a Democracy; FDR gave us one anyway.
Now, as soon as we give up our rights to bear arms, our local
police will most likely be replaced with foreign troops under the
control of the United Nations. It appears we have taken to heart
the advice given us by our Judeo-Christian preachers, "...turn the
other cheek and love thine enemies.” Love is for our family,
friends and neighbors, not your enemies.
G.T., Georgia
52 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
Official Definition
of
DEMOCRACY
Here arc four (4) fac simile section reproductions taken from
a 156 page book officially compiled and issued by the U. S. War
Department, November 30, 1928, setting forth exact and truthful
definitions of a Democracy arid of a Republic, explaining the differ-
*
ence between both. These definitions were published by the author-
ity. of the United States Government and must be accepted as
i
authentic in any court of proper jurisdiction.
. These precise and scholarly definitions of a Democracy and a
Republic were carefully considered as a proper guide for U. S.
soldiers and U. S. citizens by the Chief ol Staff of the United States
♦ ,
Army. Such definitions take precedence over any "definition” that
may be found in the present commercial dictionaries which have
suffered periodical "modification” to please "the powers in office.”
Shortly after the "bank holiday" in the thirties, hush-hush
orders from the White House suddenly demanded that all copies
of tljis book be withdrawn from the Government Printing Office
and the Army posts, to be suppressed and destroyed without ex*
planation.
( This was the beginning of the complete red control of the
Government from within, not from withotjt.
w Liberty Bell / June 1994 — 53
i
(No. I f»c
TRAINING MANUAL
No. 2000-25
TM 2000—2
1
WAR DEPARTMENT,
Washington, November 8 0 , 19 t 8 ,
CITIZENSHIP
Prtpirtd under dirtetiot of the
Chief of Staff
This ms mini snpersedos Manual of Citizenship Training
The use of the publication u The Constitution of the United States , 0 by Harry
Atwood , is by permission and courtesy of the author .
The source of other references is #hoton In the bibliopraphy ,
(No. 2 fac limile)
CITIZENSHIP
TM 2000-25
118-180
Democracy :
A government of the masses.
Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of
“ direct ” expression.
Results in mobocracy.
Attitude toward property is communistic — negating property
rights.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate,
whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, preju-
dice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences.
Results in domngogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
54 — Liberty Bell / June 1994
(No. 3 •imile)
TM 2000-25
120-181 CITIZENSHIP
Republic:
Authority is derived through the election by the people of public
officials best fitted to represent them.
Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights,
and a sensible economic procedure.
' Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with
fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to
f consequences.
I A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be '
brought within its compass.
i Avoids me dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mpbocracy.
I Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and
1 progress.
1 Is the “ standard form ” of government throughout the world.
M A republic Is a form of government under a constitution which provides for
9 the election of (1) an executive and (2) a legislative body, who working
« together in a representative capacity, have all the power of appointment, nil
I pmver of legislation, ull power to raise revenue and appropriate expenditures,
K nm| are required to create (3) a judiciary to pass upon the justice and legality
I of their governmental acts and to recognize (4) certain Inherent Individual
I rights.
B Take away any one or more of those four elements and you are drifting into
9 autocracy. Add one or more to those four elements and you are drifting Intd
B democracy. — Aurood.
H 121. Superior to all others, — Autocracy declares the divine
1 right of kings; its authority can not be questioned; its powers are
1 arbitrarily or unjustly administered.
| Democracy is the “ direct ” rule of the people and has been re-
| peatedly tried without success,
1 Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weak-
I ness of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely
1 in mind, defined a representative republican form of government
m They “ made a very marked distinction between a republic and A
9 democracy * * * and said repeatedly and emphatically that
1 they had founded a republic.”
(No- 4 foe •imile )
[A. G. 014.33 (4-28—28) .]
Bx order of the Secretary of War
Official :
LUTZ WAHL,
Major General,
The Adjutant General
C. I\ SUMMERALL,
Major General t
Chief of Staff \
ADDITIONAL COPIES
or THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
U. 3. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON, D. C.
AT
SO CENTS PER COPY
Why Democracies Fail
A Democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of
Government It can only exist until the voters discover
they can vote themselves largess out of the public
treasury* From that moment on the majority always
votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from
the public treasury with the result that Democracy always
collapses over a loose £scal policy, always to be followed
by a Dictatorship,
(Written by Professor Alexander Froser Tytter , nearly two centuries ago
while our thirteen original states were still colonies of Great Britain ,
At the time he was writing of the decline and fall of the Athenian
Republic ouer two thousand years before .)
— Reprinted from the Freeman Magazine
Did I Bay "republic)” Bv God, ye«, I said "republic!” Long live the
glorious republic of the United States of America. Damn democracy.
It is a fraudulent term used, often by ignorant persons but no less often
by intellectual fakers, to describe an infamous mixture of socialism, miscegena-
tion, graft, confiscation of property and denial of personal rights to individuals
whose virtuous principles make them offensive.
by Westbrook Pegler in the New York Journal American of January
25th and 26th, 195 I, under the titles "Upholds Republic of U, S.
Against Phony Democracy" and "Democracy in the U, S. Branded
Meaningless."
56 — Liberty Bell /June 1994
~~ KEEP THE LIBERTY BELL RINGING!
Please remember: Our Fight is Your fight! Donate whatever you
can spare on a regular- monthly or quarterly- basis. Whether it is
$2 $5. $20., or $100. or more, rest assured it is needed here and
will be used in our common struggle. If you are a businessman,
postage stamps in any denomination are a legitimate business ex-
pense -and we need and use many of these here every month
and will be gratefully accepted as donations .
Your donations will help us spread the Message of Liberty and
White Survival throughout the land, by making available addi lonal
copies of our printed material to fellow Whites who do not yet know
what is in store for them. I
Order our pamphlets, booklets, and, most importantly, our
reprints of revealing articles which are ideally suited for maldis-
tribution at reasonable cost. Order extra copies of Liberty
distribution to your circle of friends, neighbors, and relatives, urging
I them to subscribe to our unique publication. Our bulk prices are
shown on the inside front cover of every issue of Liberty Bell.
■ Pass along your copy of Liberty Bell , and copies of reprints you
obtained from us, to friends and acquaintances who may be on our
“wave length," and urge them to contact us for more of the same.
Carry on the fight to free our White people from the shackles of
alien domination, even if you can only join our ranks in spirit. You
can provide for this by bequest. The following are suggested forms
of bequests which you may include in your Last Will and Testament.
1 I bequeath to Mr. George P. Dietz, as Trustee for Liberty Bell
Publications, P.O. Box 21 , Reedy WV 25270 USA, the sum of $ , . .
for general purposes.
2 I bequeath to Mr. George P. Dietz, as Trustee for Liberty Bell
Publications, P.O. Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA, the following
described property for general purposes.
DO YOUR PART TODAY-HELP FREE OUR WHITE
I RACE FROM ALIEN DOMINATION!
I