ABOUT, THE AUTHOR: Dr. Revilo
Pendleton Oliver, Professor of the Classics
at the University of Illinois for 32 years, Is a
scholar of international distinction who has
written- articles In four languages for the
most prestigous academic publications in
the United States and Europe,
During World War II, Dr. Oliver was
Director of Research in a highly secret agen-
cy of the War Department, and was cited for
outstanding service to his country.
One of the very few academicians who
has been outspoken in his opposition to the
progressive defacement of our civilization,
Dr. Oliver has long Insisted that the fate of
his countrymen hangs on their willingness
to subordinate their doctrinal differences to
the tough but idealistic solidarity which is
the prerequisite of a Majority resurgence.
SOME QUOTABLE QUOTES FROM
AMERICA’S DECLINE:
i
On the 18th Amendment (Prohibition): "Very few Americans were sufficiently
sane to perceive that they had repudiated the American conception of government
and had replaced it with the legal principle of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat,'
which was the theoretical justification of the Jews’ revolution In Russia."
On Race: "We must further understand that all races naturally regard themselves
as superior to all others, We think Congoids unintelligent, but they feel only con-
tempt for a race so stupid or craven that it fawns on them, gives them votes, lavish-
ly subsidizes them with Its own earnings, and even oppresses its own people to
curry their favor. We are a race as are the others. If we attribute to Ourselves a su-
periority, intellectual, moral, or other, in terms of our own standards, we are simp-
ly indulging in a tautology. The only objective criterion of superiority, among human
races as among all other species, is biological: the strong survive, the weak perish.
The superior race of mankind today is the one that will emerge victorious— whether
by its technology or Its fecundity— from the proximate struggle for life on an over-
crowded planet."
AMERICA’S DECLINE
Order No. l 007 -$ 8.60 376 pp., pb.
plus $1 .600 (or postage and handling. ORDER FROM:
LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS, Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA
Liberty Bell
* , *V V
* fcfc
— M—
':w:»;*******’**‘***«*****«‘’ 4 **^tt^tttt^x*Xvtt^x*j$x*:v&»***^
| E. Weber, page 30. HUMOR AND FILM FROM
wmm PERSPECTIVE wig SAMMY i CLICK, 'Iby
Nicholas Carter, page 37 TRIAL BY JEWRY, by
iiiiliiiiiiwi
MARCH:I989
\foice Of Thinking Americans
t.
o
LIBERTY BELL
The magazine for Thinking Americans, has been published monthly since Septem-
ber 1973 by Liberty Bell Publications, George P. Dietz, Editor. Editorial office: P.O.
Box 21 , Reedy WV 25270 USA- Phone; 304-927-4486.
/
Manuscripts conforming to our editorial policy are always welcome, however, they
cannot be returned unless accompanied by stamped, self-addressed envelope.
Manuscripts accepted for publication become the property of Liberty Bell Publica-
lions.
©Copyright 1988
by Liberty Bell Publications.
Permission granted to quote In whole or part any article except those subject to
author's Copyright. Proper source credit and address should be given,
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION RATES:
SAMPLE COPY $ 4,00
THIRD CLASS-BULK RATE USA only $35,0 °
FIRST CLASS-USA $45.00
FIRST CLASS-all other countries $50.00
AIR MAIL - Europe, South America $60.00
Middle East, Far East, So. Africa $65.00
BULK COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION:
10 COPIES * I 22,00
50 COPIES $ 90,00
100 COPIES • • $ 150 ' 00
500 COPIES • • $600.00
1000 COPIES ' $900.00
VAViVMVi
i * i Kv«Vi
‘AWMVi
wwXvi
KVtV»ViV4V»v»v*v*v»vr»v«v#
FREEDOM OF SPEECH -FREEDOM OF THOUGHT
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
The editor/publisher of Liberty Bell does not necessarily agree with each and
every article In this magazine, nor does he subscribe to all conclusions arrived at
by various writers; however, he does endeavour to permit the exposure of Ideas
suppressed by the controlled news media of this country,
It is, therefore, in the best tradition of America and of free men everywhere
that Liberty Bell strives to give free reign to ideas, for ultimately It is ideas whic
rule the world and determine both the content and structure of our Western culture.
We believe that we can and will change our society for the better. We declare
our long-held view that no institution or government created by men, for men, is
inviolable, incorruptible, and not subject to evolution, change, or replacement by
the will of the people.
To this we dedicate our iives and our work. No effort will be spared ana no
Idea will be allowed to go unexpressed If we think It will benefit the Thinking People ,
not only of America, but the entire world. . .
George P. Dietz, Editor & Publisher
%
.v.v.v
HITLER & YAH WE H
It is not remarkable that so many Christians are taken in by
the J ews’ Holohoax. They have grown up reading in their Bible all
sorts of tales about absurdly improbable or physically impossible
events, and believing them or trying to believe them. Their percep-
tion of reality and common sense have been fatally etiolated or
completely paralysed. One wonders why they do not believe the
stories about Cinderella, Little Red Riding Hood, and Aladdin.
What is astonishing is that they evidently can keep their Chris-
tianity and their faith in the Holohoax in separate compartments
in their minds and never relate one to the other. Even their clergy,
who are supposed to have been educated in the Faith and to be
able to think in religious terms, seem never to have made a con-
nection between the two things. At least, I have never heard of a
Christian minister who, believing in the “Holocaust,” extolled
Adolf Hitler for his great and godly achievement, and from his
pulpit invited his congregation to thank their god for having in-
spired his German hero.
The holy man feels certain that Hitler parboiled or gassed or
incinerated or vaporized six million sweet Sheenies— or sixty mil-
lion, it doesn’t matter. Very well.. But what happened then? Berlin
was not engulfed by an earthquake. Frogs did not pop out of every
tuft of grass in Germany. Children bora to German women at that
time were not strangled in their cradles. The German armies were
not laid prostrate by the Angel of Death. And the sun did not hide
his face in horaor or rash back eastward, leaving the land in per-
petual night.
Surely those facts, admitted by everyone, including alb't'he
Jews, should make even a Christian theologian start to thinl^' Ac-
cording to his Holy Book, in the truth of which he must irrtplicitly
believe because it is the only basis for his business, old'Yahweh
spent four thousand years watching over and cherishing 1 his pet
tribe of barbarians and helping them swindle and plunder civilized
nations. He hypnotized a King of Egypt so that he could afflict the
• *
Liberty Bell / March 1989 1
Egyptians with every kind of plagne and suffering, and murder
their newborn children, just, to amuse his darling predators. He
taught his People how to swindle and rob the Egyptians, and then
he suspended the laws of nature to help them escape with their
loot.
When his Chosen were butchering the ancient Palestinians
and stealing their country, he even made the sun stop in its tracks
to give the marauders more daylight so they wouldn't have to stop
massacring the rightful owners of the land. When the Assyrians
wanted to clean out a nest of bandits in one of their provinces, he
slew the entire Assyrian army overnight. Whenever his barbarians
got into trouble, old Yahweh was Johnny-on-the-spot to protect
them with every kind of miracle.
Now, given Yahweh’s record, which Christians believe in-
dubitable, you can see the problem. When Hitler was trying to
clean up Germany and exterminated six million or six billion of
Yahweh’s Yids, Yahweh did absolutely nothing -did not even give
a sign of life. Surely a Christian shepherd must wonder about that,
and wonder how he can explain it to his sheep.
Christians, of course, have a ready explanation. According to
the belief universally held by Aryan and Semitic Christians from
the inception of the cult late in the Second Century until about the
middle of the Twentieth, Yahweh, who, on the record, is the most
irascible of all gods, lost his temper when the Jews rejected his
only begotten son and persuaded the Romans to crucify him. He
accordingly transfered his favor to the more civilized races whom
he had theretofore persecuted and exploited for the benefit of his
Chosen, and he told his former darlings, as is confirmed by some
passages in the “New Testment” and the virtually unanimous tes-
timony of the divinely inspired Fathers of the Church, that he was
going to punish them until they came to their senses and
apologized to his immortal son for having killed him.
Since then, for twenty centuries, old Yahweh gave his Yids
hints from time to time to remind them of their guilt, but they
remained obdurate, thinking that all they had to do was to con-
tinue to mutilate sexually their male offspring, even though Yah-
weh had said that he had lost his taste for sacrificial foreskins. It
is no wonder that after twenty centuries of unprecedented for-
bearance, Yahweh lost patience and decide to teach the barbarians
a real lesson. So he inspired Adolf Hitler, a Christian hero in spite
2 Liberty Bell / March 1989
*
r
of himself, to give the ubiquitous Yids a taste of what is in store
for all of them, if they don’t repent pronto.
This explanation, furthermore, should commend itself to all
good Christians, and indeed to all purveyors of “Holocaust”
stories, because it makes those stories plausible, as no other inter-
pretation can. The tales told by Yiddish survivors all descxibe acts
that are flagrantly impossible by the ascertained laws of chemistry
and physics. It follows, therefore, that the extermination was car-
ried out in violation of the laws of nature, i.e., miraculously and by
divine intervention. We need no longer question the testimony of
even the survivor who saw Germans extermining little Kikes by
just touching a match to them, whereupon the greasy infants
blazed like pitch-pine torches. With God, all things are possible.
We need not even wonder at the multitude of survivors who
watched, undisturbed, while their poppers and mommers and
cousins and aunts were being exterminated, but were so oddly
overlooked by the methodical Germans, whose attention to detail
is proverbial. Yahweh made them invisible and so preserved them
to bear witness to his miraculous vengeance on their perverse and
ingrate race.
It follows, therefore, that Hitler was doing the Lord’s Work in
accordance with the Lord's Will, and I shudder at the perverse
impiety of Christians who fail to honor him as a Man of God and to
praise him in their litanies. Catholics and Lutherans, indeed, could
recognize him as a saint, every bit as good as Peter and Paul, and
they could give zest to their religion by building new churches
consecrated to St. Adolf. And that, incidentally, would show the
Neo-Nazis their failure to understand the True Religion and would
make them desist from their blind incredulity.
Now all this is what simple logic and faith requires of all Chris-
tians who retain what was once the unquestioned faith of all True
Believers. I simply cannot understand why they are now so im-
pious as to believe in the “Holocaust” and yet fail to draw the
obvious conclusion that their religion imposes on all who think
•about it,-
The foregoing considerations apply, of course, only to tradi-
tional Christianity, and not to the heresy recently promulgated by
the high-powered con men who continually fleece the suckers of
millions with their posturing and vulgar oratory over the Jews’
boob-tubes. They claim that Yahweh still loves his predatory bar-
barians, having overlooked such a trifle as their lynching of his
Liberty Bell / March 1989 3
only begotten son. And they threaten feeble-minded Americans
with divine vengeance, if they fail to believe whatever Jews say or
to venerate every hair on the head of every one of God's Own. But
they face the same facts.
The satanic Germans incinerated six million or billion of God's
Darlings and reduced them to holy Smoke, but old Yahweh didn't
do a thing. The Jews themselves had to use their scabrous puppets,
Roosevelt and Churchill, to stampede hordes of Aryan nitwits
against Germany, while old Yahweh didn't bother to perform even
a teeny-weeny miracle to show that he was still interested.
Now the only logical conclusion for the big-time salvation-
hucksters to draw from the events in which they claim to believe is
that old Yahweh is either dead or has decided that the earth isn't
much fun and has gone off to some livelier planet in some galaxy
thirty or forty million light years away. It is obvious, however,
why they don't draw that necessary conclusion: it would spoil their
swindle.
So we are left the problem that real Christians seem impiously
unwilling to face.
Now it is to the honor of the Jews that some of them are not
so voluntarily obtuse. I learn from an article reprinted in Chris-
tian News , 6, June 1988, that many “ Jewish fundamentalists,"
headed by a Rabbi Kook and his disciple, Rabbi Menachem Kasher,
celebrate the so-called Holocaust because it was the means
whereby “God instructed His people that the Emancipation, in
which so many Jews had placed their hopes for equality in a
democratic Europe, would not provide Jews with an escape route
from the burden of their Covenant. Thus the Holocaust is seen as
God's way of coercing His chosen people back to the Holy Land
and convincing them of the urgency of its complete reunification."
(Obviously, the “reunification" is to be procured by exterminating
all the Palestinians again, just as at the time of the first invasion,
as described in the Jew-book.) Kasher and his fundamentalists “in-
terpret Arab-Israeli wars as part of the redemption period of the
Messiah Son of Joseph, during which 'miracles are shrouded in
natural events.'" They think it likely that “two much more terrible
wars lie ahead before the appearance of the Messiah Son of
David."'
No W; whether or not you agree with those Jews or like them,
you must -respect them for having thought logically about their
“Holocaust," as Christians refuse to do. They, too, can justify the
4 Liberty Bell I March 1989
I;
l
>
absurd tales of the Jews in the survior-racket by supposing that
, Yahweh permitted miracles to facilitate the extermination of six
million or six billion Sheenies, by which he instructed the rest of
his Chosen to high-tail it for Palestine and slaughter the Semites
■- who perversely want to go on living in their own country. Thus
Hitler again must appear as the (perhaps unwitting) servant of the
| Lord, the “scourge of God," by which Yahweh chose to whip his
I darlings back to the place in which he wanted them to be. As a
f 1 doer of God's Will, he is certainly above reproach, and I hope the
[ Zionists will show him condign gratitude and honor.
As for the oddly recalcitrant Christians, I can offer them an
alternative solution, which many of them may prefer. It is part of
\ their religious doctrine to believe that the Yids will eventually
* accept their Jesus and thus be reconciled to old Yahweh. Well,
! that prophecy seems likely to be fulfilled,
j; If the Jews, having infected our race with the lentivirus of
I. Christianity, which, after fifteen centuries, has reduced it to the
i present state of mental palsy, in which Europeans and Americans
moronically acquiesce in the flooding of their countries with
anthropoid garbage and racial enemies— if the Jews succeed in
: exterminating the hated Aryans by drowning them in a fetid mass
of mongrels, they will owe their victory and their undisturbed
possession of the world Yahweh gave them to Jesus, the would-be
christ whom they rejected as a failure and impostor. They will thus
I have to venerate him at last as an emissary from their god, sent to
procure his Chosen People's eventual triumph over the hated
goyim , and so they will belatedly worship him as the true Messiah,
j Son of David. Thus the prophecy will be fulfilled and the Christian
i faith in it fully vindicated.
But even according to this scenario, the Christians are
; obligated to venerate Hitler, who, by his wonderful Holocaust,
! divinely inspired and miraculously earned out, made it possible for
God's Chosen to paralyze the last vestige of intelligence in the
Aryan boobs and thus achieve their final triumph and the annihila-
tion of the race they have always hated above all others. Hitler
will not, of course, deserve the rank of Jesus, but he must be
i recognized as a kind of auxiliary messiah, must he not?
: This interpretation, by the way, also offers the big-time
■ hokum-hucksters an opportunity to escape from the logical dilem-
ma, which I pointed out above. They can say old Yahweh planned
Liberty Bell / March 1989 $
it that way all along, and that should wow the millions of suckers
who watch them on the boob-tubes and simper mindlessly.
As for believing Christians, it remains to be seen, of course,
whether they are still capable of a modicum of logical thought
THE LATEST ON JESUS
In Liberty Bell , October 1986, I reported that old Jesus had
come back to earth and was hiding out in the frowsty purlieus of
London's East End, having disclosed his identity only to a fourth-
rate British artist named Benjamin Creme. Jesus was to have been
interviewed by the press in a tavern, but he missed the engage-
ment because some of the journalists had been drinking and had
unseemly thoughts.
Now I learn from the Denver Post , 24 November 1988, that
Apostle Creme was in Denver to spread glad tidings. He says that
Jesus has already appeared on television several times, suitably
disguised, and is getting ready to make a dramatic appearance in
propria persona. The stock market will crash before the end of
April 1989, and then all Hell will break loose, preparing mankind
for the Day of Declaration, when old Jesus will throw off his dis-
guise, announce that he forbids nuclear warfare, and bless the
whole world with oodles and oodles of brotherhood and “sharing.”
Jesus has evidently been studying Sanskrit while he was holed
up in the East End, for he now says he prefers to be addressed as
Maitreya ('the friendly one'), although, in keeping with the
doctrine of the Hindu Vedanta, he adds it doesn't really matter
what you call him.
The Christian News , 12 December 1988, reprints a manifesto
issued by Jesus under his new name, Maitreya the Christ, doubt-
less through his chosen mouthpiece:
“I am the Creator of the Universe. I am the Father and
Mother of the Universe. Everything came from Me. Everything
shall return to Me. Mind, spirit, and body are My temples for the
Self to realize in them My Supreme Being and Becoming.”
You will note that old Jesus has not only gone ecumenical, but
has taken over the act of Brahma, which (Brahma is neuter)
regularly every 8,640,000,000 years extrudes the Universe from
Itself, lets Its creation gradually decline during half of that time,
until It reabsorbs everything into Itself. Then It snoozes for
4,320,060,0Q0 years, until It wakes up and starts the creation busi-
6 Liberty Bell / March 1989
;
ness' all over. But when you consider that spacious chronology,
|: doesn’t it seem that Jesus-Maitreya is rushing things a little?
What’s more, in the style of his boasting manifesto the Christ
j has imitated the pronouncements made by most of the Egyptian
f' gods when Egypt was flourishing, e.g.:
I “I am the great god who gave birth to himself, even Nu, who
f created by his name the Divine Substance as a god. I am he who is
| not driven back among the gods. I am Yesterday; I know Tomor-
J row.” e.q.s,-
| Or, if you want some real syncretism and theocrasy, try this
it one:
| “I am the Great One, son of the Great One. I am Fire, the son
I of Fire. I am Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. I shall be bom a
f second time. I am the Soul who created the gods.... I am Osiris,
t brother of Isis. I am Orion. I am Anubis. I am Horus. I am Tern. I
was in the birth-chamber of Osiris. I was bom with him [sic]. I
J renew my youth. I am the girdle of the robe of Nu. I rescued the
' Eye of Ra when it grew dim. I judged Set. I turned night into
day.” e.q.s.
So it seems that Jesus-Maitveya, who is Christ (i.e., King of
the Jews), has been dallying with the mysticism of both India and
Egypt. Now all this raises knotty problems in theology, which I
cannot pretend to solve, You might ask your favorite holy man to
explain it all to you. And you’d better do it before the end of April,
when things begin to happen, You may not have a chance after
that.
ON TACTFUL TACTICS
j I have just received a letter from a man whose name you
! would recognize, who earnestly warns writers for Liberty Bell that
“Every time you use the word 'Aryan,' you lose friends, due to the
brainwashing of most Americans.... If they see the word ‘Aryan,’
they don’t read any further.” That is doubtless true.
Over the years since I first began to write for this periodical I
l have from time to time received admonitions that a winter should
! never mention races, because the American boobs have been con-
i' ditioned to wax irate at a suggestion that they may not be the
t lowest form of anthropoid life; that one must never mention Adolf
; Hitler with approval, because the boobs have been trained to bite
1 when they hear his name; that one must never speak unflattering-
I ly of God’s Race, because that makes the boobs clap hands over
Liberty Bell / March 1989 7
their ears and run away in a panic; that one must never speak ill
of “democracy/ because Americans dote on it; and that one
alienates readers by denouncing Reagan or any other individual,
because that is impolite and "we should attack ideas, not men.” In
shoiT, a prudent writer on our side should make what he writes
even more insipid than the average column by a syndicated pundit
in the newspapers.
I have been advised that by designating male homosexuals as
perverts, I offend some persons. I write English and I refuse to
use the argot common in low-grade brothels and newspapers, in
which prostitutes of one kind or another do not hesitate to pros-
titue the word 'gay/ It is true that there are English words which
designate homosexuals, such as 'paederast/ 'sodomite/ 'catamite/
'pathic/ etc., but all such words in good usage imply in an in-
dividual certain specific tastes and practices which are not found
in all male homosexuals, so that 'pervert' seems to be the only
inclusive term.
I am aware that certain individuals who make valuable con-
tributions to what is called the "right wing" are perverts, I recog-
nize their contributions without prejudice, and although I cannot
understand them, I can think of adequate explanations for their
conduct in terms of contemporary society, whether or not they are
Christians. I do not reject their service to our cause, but the ines-
capable fact is that, unless they are genetically defective and rep-
resent an heredity that should not be continued, they represent a
vice that is now actively promoted by schools and government
precisely because it, to the extent that it becomes prevalent, has-
tens the desired extinction of our race. That is a fact of which we
must not lose sight, whatever our attitude toward what is biologi-
cally a perversion. 1
I have received a number of earnest warnings that to subject
Christianity to historical criticism and sarcastic comment inevitab-
ly "turns off* a large potential readership, and, worst of all, is so
1. The social aspects of the phenomenon deserve careful consideration,
especially with reference to the behavior of many species of higher mam-
mals when they are held captive in zoos. — I will report the opinion of a
man who has long observed the “right wing/ that a certain kind of male
pervert is the most desirable recruit in “activist” organizations, since
such men, who are “tough” and ruthless by nature, have made themsel-
ves expert in karate, judo, and similar exercises, including the techni-
ques that British experts taught participants in "French Resistance”
during the war of 1939-1945, who learned how to kill efficiently without
using weapons or leaving clues to their identity.
8 Liberty Bell / March 1989
i
"divisive” that it amounts to sabotaging all efforts to resist the
Jewish occupation and control of the country that once was ours.
That is indeed a serious, charge, but I note that all such warnings
come from persons who modestly avow that only they and the
members of some sect or coterie are really Christian, while they
frankly admit that 95% or 99.9% of all the Christians in the United
States have been fatally misled by their dervishes about the true
tenets of the religion they profess and have thereby become in-
strumentalities of our enemies.
The authors of these admonitions differ about what should be
done. Some counsel prudent silence about religion, apparently in
the hope that the 95% or 99.9% of Christians will somehow desert
their Pied Pipers and rally to the support of our race of their own
accord. That hope seems to me to be utterly illusory. It is tan-
tamount to launching a frontal attack in battle while ignoring a
large army of enemies on one’s flank.
Some advisers urge that we limit ourselves to denouncing the
hokum-peddlers who are forever yelling that "anti-Semitism [!] is
anti-God,” and to showing how false is their claim; but that would
necessarily involve trying to flit lightly over the quicksands of a
theology that has no basis in historical fact. Others contend that
our only hope lies in purging Christianity of its many false
doctrines and restoring the “true” Christianity, which is known to
the counsellor either by personal revelation from Jesus, which will
not persuade persons who have received quite different revela-
tions from that oddly inconsistent and changeable authority, or by
the theology of his little cult, which, like all theologies, is based on
a selection of passages in the Christians’ Holy Writ which are to
be taken as authoritative, despite the many other passages in the
same collection that unmistakably contradict the ones selected.
But that would leave us embroiled in polemical controversy with
all but the votaries of some one little cult, and that would be as
fatally “divisive” as any alternative policy.
So every advice to “go easy” on Christianity would, in one
way or another, land us in an impasse. It is, however, quite true
that, as my well-meaning advisers insist, what I and others write
about Christianity in the pages of Liberty Bell is "divisive” in the
sense that we bitterly offend Christians who are inclined to favor
efforts to preserve our race and regain possession of the United
States and are therefore potential allies.
Liberty Bell / March 1989 9
It is the tacit premise of all who write to advise me that it is
the purpose of Liberty Bell to sponsor a mass movement. The
publisher assures me that is not true.
He believes that there is a place for a periodical that will state
clearly and without mitigation or euphemisms the realities of our
present situation, however grim, that may be, for the information
and consideration of persons who may hope to cope with it by
some feasible course of action. So uncompromising a journal will
necessarily appeal only to a minority, but that will be the minority
of which some members may possibly be able to lead a movement
that will have a chance of success.
It is quite true that any man who would lead a mass movement
must make many arduous and painful decisions about the policies
that will give him the greatest chance of victory. It is imperative,
however, that he make them with a full awareness of the realities
with which he must deal; otherwise, his failure is assured. It may
well be requisite for him to enlist followers by doing his best to
temper the cruel wind for shorn lambs and to avert by skillful
compromises or evasions possible causes of disruptive dissension
or premature despair. To do this effectively, however, he must
first of all not delude himself; he must know what he is doing. He
may have to be less than completely candid in what he tells his
followers, but that is often regrettably necessary in practical
human relationships.
A general, for example, may deem it best to encourage his
troops with a prospect of certain victory, but when he does so, he
must himself be fully cognizant of the enemy's forces and resour-
ces; if the situation is a desperate one, he must know the facts that
he conceals from his men, for if he does not, he and they will
inevitably be routed in an irretrievable defeat. If he has battalions
of doubtful courage or loyalty, he must assign them to positions in
which the outcome of the battle will not depend on them,
If I were writing for an organization led by a man in whose
sincerity and understanding I had confidence, I would accept his
judgement about what it would be best not to say, and although I
would never make a statement that I did not believe to be true, I
would not take exception to misleading or outrightly mendacious
statements made by my colleagues of which he did not disapprove.
And I would take care not to quarrel with them for any reason.
That, I think, is the loyalty that one owes to any leader of a
political movement. And that, I mean to say, is what I would do if
10 Liberty Bell / March 1989
I were forty years younger and chose to associate myself with a
political organization. At my present age, I would simply refuse to
undertake so trying a function, for there are many better ways of
employing the little that is left of my life.
Since the publisher of this magazine wishes me to do so, I have
, undertaken to present in these pages my best estimate of the facts
ij of our present plight. I have no illusion of infallibility -that is a
; luxury that can be enjoyed only by those who are favored with
( revelations .from omniscient spooks —but I try to state candidly the
t facts as I perceive them and the inferences and deductions that are
t logically to be drawn from them. And I try always to remind the
r. readers of the historical antecedents of the present, for a given
1 situation can be estimated accurately and understood only in
terms of what caused it.
Christianity is a superstition which, I believe, was always
deleterious to our race, even in the early centuries in which it was
not patently incredible; it now so flagrantly contradicts the scien-
tifically ascertained facts of physics, astronomy, geology, and biol-
ogy that no rational and educated man can believe it, except by
deliberately letting his reason be overruled by irrational emotions;
and its scabrous history shows it to have always been an imposture
contrived by hallucinations, forgery, and calculated mendacity. It
is now being used by fakirs and shamans to befuddle our people
and ensure the doom of our race. I believe that our only hope lies
in destroying the enormous hoax and the baleful fascination it
exerts over the gullible masses, its victims.
That does not mean that if a man who sincerely holds to the
doctrine of some Christan sect makes an effoii; on behalf of our
declining race, I will not respect him, admire his courage, and
gladly accept his cooperation in our common purposes— it was in-
deed for such cooperation that I ventured to hope when I wi'ote
Christianity and the Survival of the West in 1969, long before the
electronically instigated epidemic of mindless fanaticism that is so
large a pax*t of the religion today. I shall respect his efforts, but
.with a foreboding that his faith may make him count on super-
natural support or on a loyalty among his followei's that will be
wanting in a crisis.
If any man is sure that he can found and lead an effective
movement on behalf of our race by pi'ofessing Chidstianity while
dissembling his knowledge of the religion for the sake of such
precarious support as he may win from some dissident Christian
Liberty Bell / March 1989 11
sects, I shall wish him well, and I hope that he will profit from
some of my most sardonic comments on contemporary cults, which
illustrate the mentalities with which he must deal. He may suc-
ceed, but if he does, I shall be tempted to believe in miracles after
all.
AVALANCHE IN THE ALPS
Americans have always thought of Switzerland as an isle of
security in the heart of Europe, and a very considerable number of
them rely on that country's unique financial system to preserve
some of their capital from the exactions and depredations of the
task-masters of international crime, to whom the boobs subjected
themselves by permitting enactment of the White Slave Act, offi-
cially called the Sixteenth Amendment, They should particularly
perpend the astonishing transformation of the Swiss Federation in
recent years.
Americans who visited Switzerland in the late 1940s and
remained long enough to form some opinion of the nation— the
better part of a year, at least— were impressed, not always
favorably, by the character of its people. The Swiss were proud of
their sturdy independence, which they guaranteed by legally re-
quiring every able-bodied male to undergo military training and to
have a rifle and, preferably, other firearms always at hand and
ready for immediate use. They were proud of their Confederation,
which both united the nation and granted to each of the twenty-
two cantons more autonomy than was enjoyed by American states.
They were proud of the legend of William Tell, who refused to doff
his hat before an Austrian overlord, and of the Lion of Lucerne,
the magnificent sculpture that commemorates the loyalty unto
death of the Swiss Guards who wei'e massacnred in the Tuileries in
1792 because Louis XVI, his mind mazed by Chidstian hokum and
the babbling of “intellectual” advisers, did not have the fortitude
to be King of Finance.
The Swiss, having successfully remained aloof from the
Suici4e of Europe in 1939-1945, complacently felt a sense of great
superiority to the nations that had foolishly destroyed each other
in that insane conflict. Their attitude of cold indifference to the
rest of the world was a little tempered by sympathy for Germany,
blent of admiration for the Germans' heroic defense of their
country against the rest of the world and compassion for their
suffering at the hands of the ferocious victors. The Swiss felt an
i, ».
amused corffempt for the Italians and the Mediterranean peoples
i generally, arid a particular dislike of Americans, whose bumptious
1 • self-righteousness during their War to Save the Soviet was espe-
cially resented, while some educated Swiss remembered that the
j American itch for meddling with other peoples' business had been
, first manifested in 1852 by an insolent demand that Swiss cantons
j be deprived of their right to exclude Jews.
f All other nations, even the uncouth Americans, were free to
( base their espionage apparatus in Switzerland, so long as they
j‘ paid handscjmely, confined their operations to the territories of
| other nations, and did not try to elude the surveillance of the
I Swiss intelligence service, which prevented them from spying on
j Switzerland;
’ Eveiyone in the world was invited to place his money in the
j Swiss banks, in gold, if he wished, enjoying the security that was
given by the nation’s sound currency, the integrity of its bankers,
I and the law which gave depositors a guaranteed privacy unique in
; the world, with the perfect anonymity of the famous numbered
; accounts.
Some Americans described the Swiss as "clannish,” resenting
; their general attitude of aloofness toward foreigners, who were
i always welcome to stay in Switzerland so long as they spent
; money freely, but were rigorously excluded from economic activity
• pnd usually from social intercourse also. The Swiss sometimes
! described themselves as "the hotel-keepers of Europe.” Foreigners
| in the country were like the guests in a first-rate hotel, given what
{ they paid for, a professionally impersonal courtesy. An American
1 student complained that he had been in Switzerland for more than
a year on a fellowship and had not made a single friend, even in
, the loose collegiate sense of that word, and had not seen the inside
j of a Swiss home or become acquainted with a single Swiss, for
! even university students of his own age retreated behind a bander
; of impersonal and almost business-like politeness.
■ There may have been some justification for the charge that the
. Swiss were “materialists,” for although Switzerland had produced
great artists, such as Bocklin, and great scholars, such as
Burckhardt, national life was dominated by business and most in-
dividuals seemed to find content in good food and physical com-
fort, while the social criterion was money and decorously
established prosperity, not culture. ' .
12 Liberty Bell / March 1989
Liberty Bell / March 1989 13
Religion was of no real impoiTance; some individuals felt a
personal preference for one or another kind of ceremony that was
a matter of tradition rather than faith, but the nation as a whole
was indifferent to beliefs about the supernatural, which, after all,
had nothing to do with the operation of the factories on which the
nation's commerce depended. The grotesque theocracy of Calvin
at Geneva was remembered with a laugh or with the pertinent
observation that the Swiss character soon reduced it to the genial
rule of a patrician order, who made the city an intellectual capital
in the Eighteenth Century. The Swiss took a certain pride, as in
possession of a rarity, in the presence in their countiy of the oldest
Protestant sect, the Waldenses (V audois), who had their origin in
the Twelfth Century, had stubbornly survived innumerable per-
secutions, and, although they had found their principal refuge in
the high valleys of the Piedmont, south of the Alps, now main-
tained their small congregations in Switzerland, where tolerance
made them immune to the harassment they had suffered from the
Italian government.
The Swiss were a polyglot nation. Every educated person was
fluent in both German and French, had a working knowledge of
English and Italian, and might also speak Romansh, which had
been recognized as a fourth official language in 1937 and given a
factitious painty with German, French, and Italian. One peculiarity
was the persistence, even among educated people, of familiarity
with a local patois, such as Bemish, which is said to be a dialect of
German, although native Germans say it is as unintelligible to
them as it is to all mortals who did not grow up in the region
around Berne. The Swiss were cosmopolitan, in the sense that
they had a tolerant familiarity with the vagaries of many nations,
and also intensely nationalistic, confident of their superiority to
the rest of the world.
Americans who knew Switzerland around 1950 or in the fol-
♦ *
lowing decade were certain that the nation had a stability that
would endure far beyond the foreseeable future without essential
change. That Switzerland is now gone, like a hamlet in the Alps,
buried by an avalanche.
The once proudly independent nation is now a province of the
World Conquerors, the Masters of Deceit. The recent stages of
Swiss degradation and servitude can be traced in the files of that
unpretentious little periodical, the Courrier du Continent, publish-
ed by G.-A. Amaudruz in Lausanne.
It is obvious that the brains of the Swiss have been rotted by
the Jews' favorite poison, humanitarian swill. The nation that
f once held all foreigners at arms’ distance has now been overrun by
swarms of “refugees,” niggers and wogs, anthropoid vermin im-
: ported with the blessing of rabid holy men and simpering female
sentimentalists, who seem to welcome their own eventual enslave-
,s •
\ ment by hordes of mongrels, come to produce the situation so
i vividly portrayed in Jean Raspail’s Camp of the Saints (available
from Liberty Bell Publications, $9.50 postpaid). And, as should
now be obvious to everyone who is willing to use his mind, the
, importation of such creatures, whether as “refugees” or under
I some other patently spuxious pretext, is part of a global plan to
exterminate Aryans everywhere. (Cf. the article by Ivor Benson in
| Liberty Bell, April 1988, pp. 13-20.) A nation that permits such an
influx is obviously no longer fit to survive.
How completely the Jews now have their claws about the
necks of the Aryans in Switzerland was shown by the case of Mme.
Mariette Paschoud, who, an instructor in the state schools, dared
to express doubts about the Sacred Sheenies’ absurd Holohoax.
{ The Swiss were horrified that a lowly Aryan should dare to ques-
tion a Holy Lie, and the woman was hounded from her tenured
position. When the distinguished Professor Faurisson wanted to
! come to Switzerland to testify about the Hoax on her behalf, he
was refused admission, since no Swiss should have the mush in his
; skull disturbed by facts. And now, according to the Courrier,
November 1988, the Jews say they are worried because the wicked
woman's husband holds a governmental position; they say that
Switzerland's fair name as an “humanitarian country” is
blemished by the employment in an official capacity of a man who
did not murder or, at least, divorce a wife who sinned against
God’s Race. A courageous Swiss replied that the Federal govem-
| ment is not at the orders of the Kikes’ Defamation League, but
1 don’t assume that he will not suffer for his audacity.
; From the same issue of the Courrier I learn that Henri Ro-
: ques and his publisher, Pierre Guillaume, were expelled from Swit-
| zerland and forbidden to return because they had permitted
; themselves to be interviewed by the press in Geneva. The police
: who expelled the two gentlemen claimed they had sinned by men-
I tioning Mme. Paschoud and thus “intervening in Swiss affairs,”
) but according to M. Amaudruz, who was present at the interview,
that was false. The lie will show you how Jewish morality has
r
i Liberty Bell J March 1989 IS
14 Liberty Bell / March 1989
infected even the Swiss police. It is likely that MM. Roques and
Guillaume would not have been allowed to enter the country, had
their names been recognized at the border. Switzerland, with a
tender Christian concern for “all mankind,” now welcomes Jews,
niggers, wogs, perverts, degenerates, drug-addicts, drug-vendors,
and the bandits of international finance, but it cannot tolerate
Aryans who are so prejudiced that they do not worship Yahweh’s
Yids.
Perhaps I should remind the reader of the character of the
men who were run out of Switzerland. Henri Roques, an engineer
whose age was reported as sixty-six, decided to seek a doctoral
degree in the field of Humanities at the University of Nantes, and
for his doctoral dissertation he chose a critical study of the tes-
timony that the Jews extorted from a frightened German by
threats and perhaps torture, doubtless promising to spare him as a
reward for his perjury, after which, as is the custom of the
predators, they disposed of him so that he would have no oppor-
tunity to retract his lies. Readers of the fundamental woi'k by
Professor Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, will not need
a discussion of the thoroughly discredited and self-contradictory
statements of Kurt Gerstein, who, at the behest of the Jews who
had their claws about his throat, cheerfully swore to a wild assort-
ment of chemical and physical impossibilities.
M. Roques made a detailed study of the various stories
Gerstein told, from which the Jews select what they want for a
given imposture on the credulity of the Aryans, whom they now
despise for their venality and stupidity. The inevitable conclusion
of such a study was that Gerstein was simply a liar and that there
is no valid evidence for the existence of the famous gas chambers
in which six million of God’s Darlings were supposedly killed
before they crawled into the United States to join in the occupa-
tion of their newest Promised Land.
M. Roques’ dissertation was submitted to a panel of scholars
of which Professor Jean-Claude Riviere was the Chairman, and
they were so impressed by its meticulous accuracy, thorough
documentation, and critical acumen that they not only approved it
unanimously but added to their endorsement a special commenda-
tion, so that the University of Nantes conferred the doctoral de-
gree on the candidate with the French equivalent of magna cum
laude.
That was an event that made Americans rejoice that academic
integrity survived in one part of the world, but the rejoicing was
premature. The apaches who operate the French government for
the Master Race foamed at the mouth at the thought that univer-
sity professors should not be as corrupt as they were. They
“revoked” the doctoral degree -they didn’t think of revoking Dr.
Roques’ birth-certificate, too -and punished Professor Riviere by
sh am efully demoting him and officially censuring his colleagues.
Dr. Roques (as he should be entitled, because no set of thugs
can cancel an academic achievement, any more than they can can-
cel a man’s birth) found in M. Guillaume a publisher so courageous
that he dared print the historical study. At last reports, the
traitors who rule France are acting to suppress the book that
offends their owners.
The same issue of the Courrier reports that the Jews an-
nounce that the Swiss Parliament is going to enact a law that will
make doubts about the Holohoax or failure to venerate Jews a
felony, doubtless to be punished more severely than trivial crimes,
such as rape and murder. As the editor remarks, it is odd that the
members of the legislative assembly had not been told they were
going to enact such a law, which is thus far only a proposal made
by a Kikess in a letter to the Federal Council. But it is likely that
when the Jews crack the whip, their Swiss dogs will obey. It is
ominous that the editor of the Courrier, who has resolutely pub-
lished his admirably concise little periodical for almost a quarter of
a century, unperturbed by Jewish threats, in the current issue (No.
297) asks for help in distributing it while there is yet time, “vu la
menace d’une loi-museliere.”
The very possibility that a law to muzzle Aryan dogs lest they
divulge facts inconvenient to their Yiddish masters could be
proposed in Switzerland will give you the measure of that once
proud and independent nation’s degradation and ignominy.
Americans who have thought to place any of their resources in
safe-keeping in Switzerland should take warning. In a nation so
■rotted, nothing can be kept secret from the world's ubiquitous
parasites, and whatever the integrity of the bankers, American
deposits in Switzerland soon will be, if they are not already,
known to the Defamation League. And if the deposits have been
kept secret from the vultures of Infernal Revenue, the knowledge
can be used for blackmail or reprisal.
16 Liberty Bell / March 1989
Liberty Bell / March 1989 17
I
The Swiss can no longer boast of their independece. They sur-
rendered without even a token resistance and are now in the
plight of the Germans, who can at least remember with pride the
valor and heroism with which they sought to maintain their inde-
pendence against the crazed hordes of their own race who were
stampeded against them. According to the Christian Science
Monitor , 13 December 1988, Major General Otto-Emst Remer,
author of Verschworung und Verrat urti Hitler (reviewed by Dr.
Charles E. Weber in Liberty Bell , June 1987, pp. 52-58; cf.
February 1988, pp. 3 f .), is being prosecuted by the renegades who
misgovern Germany for having given someone a videocassette
that suggested doubts about the Holohoax. Yahweh's Chosen now
feel assured that they have the Allans of the whole world by the
neck and can rub their faces in Yiddish excrement.
And finally, if you want a preview of what is in store for
Americans, I note that Notre Europe , in its issue for October 1988,
reports that a French court, sustained by an appellate court, has
taken a four-year-old girl from her parents, on the grounds that
her father has expressed National Socialist opinions. The court
found that the child's character would be "perturbed” by contact
with such a parent. What the French jurists mean, of course, is
that the girl might not grow up to be a feeble-minded whore, as all
Aryan females should be in the "One World” that will have its
capital in Jerusalem.
MORE FUN
The contempt that Jews feel for the stupid Aryans, who are so
gullible that they believe not only the big Holohoax but any little
hoax by a whimsical tribesman, must be nearly infinite —and, I
fear, justified. I gave a few examples of Yiddish Spqfi in Liberty
Bell , March 1988.
When the Courrier du Continent for February 1988 came to
hand, it repoifed two noteworthy examples. One gave the con-
clusion of a panic in Holland, where the government, determined
not to get in Dutch with the Jews, ordered a theatre in Rotterdam
to close a quite innocuous play which, however, seemed to dis-
please the Master Race. The next day the press screamed that vile
Neo-Nazis had, in reprisal, kidnapped a forty-nine year old Kike,
Jules Croiset, an extremely popular and prosperous funny man in
the theatres, and what was more, many lovely Jewish families
received vilely threatening letters from the secret Storm
18 Liberty Bell / March 1989
Troopers, who were doubtless preparing to staii: stuffing Sheenies
into gas chambers. The great horde of Jews in Holland began
promptly to moan and wail about how awfully God's Innocents are
always persecuted for their righteousness. The Minister of Justice
in the Dutch government went into a frenzy, calling out the police
to track down the horrible monsters who didn't love Yahweh's
Masterpieces. Feeble-minded Aryans beat their breasts in public
and begged to be forgiven for existing, while the editors of the
jewspapers tried to scream louder every day.
That was in November 1987 and for the rest of the year, as
squadrons of police rushed hither and yon in a vain search for the
malefactors, all of the Netherlands was in an agony of suspense
and its good burghers quivered in fear lest a hair on a godly head
be harmed by the elusive evildoers.
Worse was to come with the New. Year. The Belgian police
arrested the sportive Jules Croiset, who had kidnapped himself to
a hideout in Bruges, from which he was watching the fun. He
confessed that he had not only staged his kidnapping, but had
written all the letters with which his imaginary Neo-Nazi gangs
threatened to slay his holy compatriots. But the outcome merely
proves how virulent is "Aunt-eye-see-me-tism” in the Low
Countries, for, believe it or not, there were suggestions that the
jolly boy should be prosecuted for his prank.
At about the same time, the State Procurator in the Italian
province of Bolzano, at the foot of the Alps, a man whose name
suggests that he may have superhuman ichor in his veins, had a fit
when he noticed that the inhabitants, who still speak German
despite all the efforts of the Italian government, were buying and
often displaying German medals and insignia bearing the dread
Hakenkreuz, the lightning-symbol of the horrible Schutzstaffel, or
the Totenkopf of several famous regiments. That could portend
only a revival of "racism,” the un-Christian belief that Aryans
were not created to nourish the world's parasites. He ordered the
confiscation of all such damnable things in his province.
Then an Italian periodical, Orion , disclosed- the delectable fact
that the principal wholesale distributor of the forbidden merchan-
dise is a Jew who imports it from the factories in Israel, where it
is manufactured with dies that were stolen and asported by Jews
after the defeat of Germany, Aren't God's People cute?
Now Christian News, 5 December 1988, quotes a tirade by the
Reverend Andrew Weyermann of the Evangelical Lutheran
Liberty Bell! March 1989 19
Church, who orated: "How many more times must monuments
raised in redemptive memory be defaced? The violent re-emerge,
brandish swastikas, and seem to rewrite history by smearing the
word 'liars' on the monuments. How many more genocides must
occur before the Lord comes to exterminate the unjust?''
As we all know, Christian shamans sweat with righteousness
and drip with love for all mankind when they howl for blood, but I
fear the Man of God will have to wait a long time for Jesus to pop
out of the clouds and sate his homicidal lusts. He will learn that
this is a do-it-yourself world.
One must, however, admire the Jews for their powers of
self-control. Many of them, no doubt, watched the Reverend's war-
dance and heard him yell for scalps, but I will wager that not one
burst into loud guffaws while in public.
MINI-HOAX ABORTED
The National-Zeitung (Munich), 4 November 1988, disclosed an
amusing little contretemps in the German postal service, which
had decided to issue a postage stamp that would make the stupid
Aryans grovel a little more abjectly at the stinking feet of their
Yiddish masters. Chosen was the picture of a holy synagogue
wrapped in flames as it was destroyed in the awful Kristallnacht
in 1938, when some Germans, too enthusiastically celebrating
their liberation from their parasites,’ broke a few windows. The
picture of the burning Gotteshaus, which is reproduced in the
newspaper, would have made a quite picturesque postage stamp
and might have impressed some dolts. The pious undertaking,
however, was ruined by the Keystone Agency, which supplies
photographs to German newspapers. In a bulletin to all of its sub-
scribers the agency identified the picture as showing the
synagogue burning after it was set afire by an incendiary bomb
from British planes in a raid on 24 November 1943.
So, alas! the mendacious postage stamp could not be foisted on
the German public, because it was impossible to blame the British
barbarians, who, as the Principal Secretary of the British Air
Minstry had boasted in a book published in 1944, had inaugurated
the terroristic bombing of open cities and civilians in Germany to
force Germany to bomb civilians in England and thus generate
enthusiasm for Churchill's War— a war Churchill had contrived to
please the Sheenies who were his paymasters. But surely there
must have been horrible Neo-Nazis in the press agency that
spoiled the godly little hoax. German laws which forbid the lower
races to question whatever God's Own choose to tell their victims
will doubtless be tightened to prevent such intempestive dis-
closures of truth in the future.
i
ARE ARYANS OBSOLETE?
Our race has always reserved its highest admiration for per-
sonal courage and personal honor, which form our ideal of man-
hood. The great heroes of our race are warriors: Arjuna, Achilles,
Horatius, Gunnar, Gawain, Roland.... In battle they slay the
enemy hero (whom we also admire, e.g. Hector) in a fair fight or
many lesser men who attack them simultaneously. They single-
handed slay dragons, as do George, Beowulf, Siegfried.... Or they
defeat supernatural forces by sacrificing themselves for their na-
tion, as did Curtius, Decius .... And always they keep unblemished
their honor, their integrity as warriors and men.
The Aryan hero is a pointed contrast to the Jew boy, David,
who, when a warrior, Goliath, stands before his army and, in keep-
ing with the old Aryan tradition (cf. the Horatii), challenges his
adversaries to send a champion to meet him in a duel, sneaks up
and kills him from a distance with a slingshot. That is like chal-
lenging a man to a duel with swords and then drawing a pistol and
shooting him. It offends our sense of honor, and even the Jews
thought it best to mitigate the offense by making Goliath absurdly
accept a challenge from his puny adversary, but the unvarnished
story corresponds to the ethic of a race that is practical and
believes in killing an enemy efficiently and preferably by
treachery, involving the least risk to oneself— a race that despises
us for our romantic notions of personal honor and fairness even in
combat.
The Aryan ideal is personal courage in hand-to-hand combat,
preferably with swords. When missiles, arrows and bullets, be-
come the major weapons, they are still preliminaries, so to speak,
of a fight man-to-man. Even in naval warfare, Roman galleys or
' British ships-of-the line, when the catapults and cannon have done
their work, the final combat is typically by boarding. The Light
Brigade at Balaklava rode against the cannon and sabered the
Russian gunners. Arid during the two catastrophic World Wars,
knighthood returned for a season with duels in the air.
We admire the great commanders who lead armies or fleets to
victory: Alexander, Caesar, Napoleon; Don Juan, Nelson— or were
20 Liberty Bell / March 1989
Liberty Bell / March 1989 21
defeated with honor by overwhelmingly superior forces: Rommel,
Von Spee....
The instinct of personal combat is in the blood of our males,
when not degenerate, even in childhood. One of the delightful
stories of “Said” (H. H. Munro) deals with a silly woman who does
not want her boys to play with toy soldiers and imagine war and
slaughter, so she tries to substitute peaceful playthings, aldermen
and parliamentarians and reformers like John Stuart Mill, who
orate and vote instead of fighting, with the result, of course, that
the healthy boys convert the figures and use them as soldiers in
pitched battles.
Manhood for Aryans means courage and honor, and even in
the terribly mechanized and dysgenic wars of this century there
was still a place for virile fortitude and heroism. But we seem now
to face a future in which our racial psyche will be frustrated and
otiose— a future in which great wars will be won by scientists and
technicians, who may be cowardly little weaklings, but will loose
ballistic missiles and laser beams against which all personal
courage will be vain and, indeed, impossible. So far as we can •
foresee, the spiritual force that made our race great and made us
the masters of the entire planet before poisonous superstitions
made us degenerate and moronic — that vital force, even if revived,
will be ineffectual, powerless, and useless. Are Aryans now ob-
solete? • D
mmmmmmmMimiSM
liiliiillillllllllllllll
IlillllliiiliffiillWil
this thesls fie lookf kt thexfdti
Mliiiililiiloiiiilhii
illliiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iilliiiiiilMiiiiiihilii:
muMinQiii
ahcl W: raci:!! Be h wl< : : goe : s!
Biliillllillllilllilll
tne wnite Hace today* and ...
d|ci hsjpM: jci®
MIHlfiHHI
\A/oQtd rn-KAn hO conH :< fci4 Of) inf'll
sf.rw.O :/ V7.ct f: l: jfv: b.y I : 1 f.V. K |y \ M M
22003) to: LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS, Box 21 j Reedy WV
22 Liberty Bell / March 1989
A RATIONAL RELIGION
Nicholas Carter
T he human animal has but a brief interval of unmeasured time, an
indefinite, but ever-running hour-glass, that will —as surely as the
sun will continue to crown one horizon and dissolve into the other — run
out. And then his place will know him no more; and all of his sighs and
songs and furies, will be no more.
[ “I could be bound in a nutshell,” mused a great poet, “and count
myself king of infinite space, were it not that I dream ”
t Oh, those tantalizing dreams; those ever-erupting echoes motivated
by longings deeply rooted in the primeval subconscious self: desires not
always fully understood, not always spelled out in the all-too-often
murky language of the conscious self; yearning visions more often than
not dammed up, or subverted by, the thousand unnatural and negative
shocks that our beings have been made heir to by religions and
philosophies rooted in renunciation and self-hate, in fear, mysticism,
and fate; or in a dreadful, mindless dabbling with psychedelic drugs.
Since we are not born in nutshells, since we are dreamers, we can-
not exist without questions. We cannot live without seeking answers to
questions. Just as it is the nature of the scorpion to sting, it is the nature
of man to wonder. We are islands of wonderment in an ocean of ques-
tions. Among them:
How came this universe to be, and what is it made of? What is the relation-
ship between mind and matter? Is knowledge empirically relativistic or is it
abstractly absolutist? What is the measure of good and evil in the universe?
Is man free to mold his own destiny or is he a mere straw In the wind? Is
1 death the end of our existence? Is the human soul “personal” or immortal? Is
there a God?
Only the philosophically-aware person— in the truest sense of the
concept: an individual with an integrated view of life that is both ration-
al and consistent, as opposed to the followers of the magicians of mys-
i ticism, who succumb to the rankest of superstitions, and the simplest
psychological pacifiers -can begin to approach these questions. Only
■j the thinker who looks by means of human reason for intelligible
theories that apply to the world or the meaning of life can begin to find
■! answers to these questions that truly relate to the “human condition.”
1 Like it or not, the lifestyle of the individual is in his own hands. The
course of a human life is marked out by the values he, or she, has
1 chosen. Neither myth, nor mysticism, nor magic, nor warm-blooded
|: feelings can truly assign value. Only cool-blooded rationalism can
Liberty Bell f March 1989 23
enable the individual to make the decisions that will effect his personal
life in ways that will be both fulfilling and enriching. “Whilst I study to
find how I am a microcosm or little world, I find myself something more
than a fearful fool mesmerized by a catalogue of simple-minded
wonders.” Thus speaks the eclectic human being in a world in which
irrational certainty is invariably more comfortable than rational doubt-
in which the most esoteric questions are invariably linked to the least
objective solutions.
I am referring to the world of “faith.”
From Adae (the ancestral reverential customs of the Ashanti and
kindred peoples of Ghana) to Zombie (the faith of the “living- dead,”
those whose souls have been eaten by witches), thousands of religions
shingle the metaphysical summits of the human species. Everywhere on
earth, we find people turning to some version of a Supreme Being: a
personal SXJPER-parent who will provide them with comforting
answers and easy salvation. From the grave Moslem worshiper in
mosques, on housetops, and in the vastness of the desert; to the Hindu
in his intricately carved temples, to the Buddhist before his flower-
strewn shrine, to the Parsee before the sacred fire, to the Sufi or Yogi
wrapped in mysticism, to the American Indian before the “Great
Spirit” — a wide assemblage of God-seekers inhabit the world.
Everywhere we see morality and reason subordinated to the beliefs of
cults, denominations, and mysterious schemes that have survived down
through the ages, or that happen to be contemporarily in vogue.
Even some scientists manifest a thirst for transcendence.
Is the universe a “cosmic computer” — a cellular automaton, as it
were? Cellular automata can produce endlessly intricate patterns from
the merest shred of a program; and that makes them very good can-
didates for computers of the cosmic variety. Ergo, a simple number—
81 , for instance — might be pinpointed via cellular automation, as
possibly containing the secret leading to the origin of life. But what
would a monstrous computational universe really tell us about the
reasons for life evolving in the first place? Well— we could always con-
clude that some cosmic computer programmer set the whole works in
motion for the purpose of determining this, that, or something else. But
that would bring us back to square one, wouldn’t it?
Sociobiology, on the other hand, propounds the revolutionary /
theory that plants and living creatures are like huge robotic devices that
are employed by genes in order to reproduce themselves— genetic
entrepreneurs, as it were. Ergo, the transmission of genetic information
is the mis on d etre of the entire system. Out of this theory comes the
24 Liberty Bell / March 1989
evolutionary basis for cooperation and altruism. As a result of this
“ruthless genetic calculus,” we cooperate with each other, even to the
point of sacrificing our lives if necessary, because a goodly number of
our genes will be preserved. Are we really so mechanistic or robotic
that our reasons for living and dying — regardless of the emotional
and/or rational content of those reasons— are simply rooted in the
preservation of our genes?
Other social scientists describe society as simply an “organism” -
with life meaning nothing more than “unity.” This “general systems
theory” involves a fusion of evolution, information, and society, with the
predetermination of life being to create more and better information—
an “intention” of life that supposedly bears with it such moral impera-
tives as pacifism and ecological awareness. (And, no doubt, various and
sundry other utopianistic commandments such as total equality, total
happiness, and total sexual fulfillment.)
Consider, too, the crazy quilt of transcendentalism that exists out-
side of “organized” religion.
In this most advanced age of science and technology, East Indian
faith-healers, New Age gurus, and scholarly apostles of the dictates of
chance, carry the revolt against reason to countless thousands of
Americans. What honest passion or ecstasy, what sense of life, what
truthful desire, can be found in the First Church of Satan in San Fran-
cisco, where chickens are beheaded, naked women are used as altars,
and phallic symbols are shaken toward each point of the compass for
benediction; or in the throwing of the I Ching— that Chinese classic of
cosmic gibberish; or in the simplistic mumbo-jumbo (“Rather than
propel, the stars impel.”) of astrology, wherein fate and character are
supposedly explained by concentrations of burning gases out in space?
The newest “faith” is the so-called Yuppies’ religion: the New Age
philosophy. Common to many of its adherents are a belief in reincarna-
tion, in astrology, in the miraculous powers of quartz crystals, in trance
channelers, or mediums, individuals who claim to have the power to
summon up voices from centuries ago. There are now New Age chur-
ches, radio programs, stores, tapes, newsletters, magazines, seminars,
and classes, and jewelry containing “healing” stones. Mysticism running
rampant!
But what of those of us who cannot accept the world of transcen-
dentalism? Can there be more to religion than magic, mysticism, and
miracles; more than spiritualism and supernaturalism; more than the
occult, the uncanny, and the mysterious that has degenerated into mys-
tification? Can we be “cosmic dancers” linked to nature rather than
Liberty Bell / March 1989 25
SUPER-nature? Is there life after theism?
Without question, the answer is — YES! Contrary to theists
everywhere, “religious atheist” is not, like “objective theologian”, an
oxymoronic description. Religion can also be defined as a specific sys-
tem of non-theistic reverential belief. That religion can exist without a
belief in a personal God is Siddhartha Gautama's great contribution to
the world of metaphysics. In the sense that the Buddha was a non-
theist, I am a non-theist. I am referring to the mortal Buddha— the
living Buddha before all of the legends about him were absorbed by
myth, and he was transformed into an unadulterated, virgin-born,
miracle-performing, deity.
Uncompromisingly, the religion of Buddha (budh denotes both to
wake up and to know) was atheistic, since he did not believe in the
existence of a personal God (or even a divine Trinity) in control of the
universe, or in a world that was created by, and was governed by, a
single Supreme Being having human traits of intelligence and will in
magnified form.
All concepts of a Supreme Being have their origins in the in-
doctrination of a particular “faith.” There is no difference in principle
in the manner in which little children, or converts, are affected by con-
ditioning to believe in the doctrines of Christianity, witchcraft, Com-
munism, voodoo, Judaism, or any other system of belief. The hucksters
of deism would have us believe that religious language refers to divine
reality that exists in its own right, independent of our human desires
and thoughts. It is safe to assume, however, that divine reality had ab-
solutely nothing to do with the deification of Nero, the Buddha, the
Dalai Lama, and even Hirohito and Mao Tse-tung; nor with the total
acceptance of these counterfeit deities on a reverential level in typical
doctrinal language by millions of people. Obviously, the concept of God
is precisely what the deification-conditioned mind decrees it to be.
Understanding this rather simple psychological phenomenon better
than most philosophers, Buddha sought a way of salvation with depend-
ence upon a self-reliant ethical life as opposed to the blind dependence,
upon any kind of divine being. He scorned as futile all supernatural
theories regarding cosmic ultimates; he was indifferent to the fashion of
philosophical flight into mysticism and supernaturalism; and he ignored
the trappings of organized religion: worship, prayer, sacrifices,
sacramentalism, priests, scriptures. Priests were unnecessary because
each person should work out his own salvation. Sacrifices were un-
necessary because there were no gods to whom to offer them.
In the simplest terms, his primary concern was with the inevitable
26 Liberty Bell / March 1989
consequences of human conduct. His “faith” was one of morality, self-
appreciation, ethical individualism, and self-reliance— a faith with deep
reverence for the universe; and an equally deep respect for Dhdrma , the
Eternal Law of the universe. In Buddha's understanding, the eternal
Supreme Force of the universe replaced the creative Supreme Being.
Rather than “force,” I prefer “substance” — the term cleverly used by
Christians (“Three persons in One Substance...”) to embrace the con-
cept of a Triune God, the mystery that three are one, and one is three.
In essence, then, we are all persons of one substance— that of the
Supreme Substance of the universe. We do not know whether the
universe as we know it had a beginning— all Big Bang speculations to
the contrary notwithstanding— or if it will have an end. From the
standpoint of certainty, we know only that it is there, here, and seeming-
ly everywhere.
Any interest in reincarnation on the part of Buddha wa‘s equivocal
at best, for the reason that he did not believe in an immortal soul. After
death, what? Reunion with the universe, as that basic matter of which
we are composed is reabsorbed. Nirvana is reached. Oblivion is at-
tained. There is eternal rest.
What of the soul, or personality that includes the mind, memories,
and the propensities that have accumulated from a unique pattern of
life experiences? Buddha surmised that the personality was not immedi-
ately extinguished at the time of death, but was slowly lost by degrees.
The doctrine of transmigration is founded on this theory. But even for
the brilliant Buddha, this was mere speculation without objective foun-
dation. Some Burmese believe. that the personality-soul forms into an
invisible butterfly at the moment Of death. Seeing a dead human being
and a dead animal side by side, appearing as always, so strangely similar
\ in death, and picturing invisible butterflies hovering over the corpses is,
at best, imagination boggling— assuming, that is, that the Burmese see
I souls, in all living things. If not, why not? The earthly human condition
/ differs in degree but not in principle from the earthly animal condition.
1 We eat, sleep, defecate, give birth, and even experience rapid eye move-
ments (REM) when we dream, just like animals; and we cease to be
•with a similar kind of whisper.
Regarding death and the final dissolution of the personal soul,
there is no test for determining if it is lost by degrees after quietus.
Thanks to modem medical knowledge regarding diseases of the elderly,
however, we can at least speculate about the degree of loss before
death. Imagine a stop-action camera recording the total progress of
Alzheimer's Disease in a patient. The finished film would reveal the
Liberty Bell / March 1989 27
slow but progressive disappearance of everything that composed that
person’s identity/personality/soul*- leaving only a living shell with eyes
that look but do not see.
Physically, spiritually, logically— where did it all go? Was it slowly
deposited into some metaphysical receptacle somewhere? Did it slowly
form into an invisible butterfly, as opposed to taking shape suddenly at
the moment of a different type of death? Perhaps. But the dictates of
logic point in an entirely different direction: That human soul simply
ceased to be— just as the life of an engine ceases to be— or, as we say,
“dies” — when a breakdown occurs, or when the source of power is in-
terdicted.
Within the circle of the imposing universe enveloping us, not all is
mysterious. Some of the questions that plagued our ancestors have been
answered. Most importantly, we know that the Second Law of Ther-
modynamics-events in the physical world proceed spontaneously in
only one unique direction— is neither schizophrenic (the law has only
one face and only one bearing) nor surrealistic (the law never varies
from day to day or year to year). Just as the same stream at any given
point will never be exactly the same again, the same precise conjugation
of atoms, molecules and bodily cells can never come together again to
produce the same personal soul; nor can that same soul ever be reincar-
nated in conjunction with a different stream of atoms, molecules, and
bodily cells, not only for the future as we see it, but for all eternity.
We know, too, that gravity, the speeds of light and sound, the com-
positions of earth, air, fire/ and water, the change of the seasons, etc.,
never violate the law of identity. Apart from being deterministic but
random -which explains the unpredictability of weather— the Supreme
and also Moral law of the universe never plays magical tricks (miracles
and wondrous predetermined acts) on Mother Nature and her flock of
humans. We evolve out of one sleep to life; and we are reabsorbed into
another sleep, losing only our personal souls, and leaving only the—
WHY. And there’s the rub. It isn’t going quietly into that good night
that’s tough. It’s going without answers. And this simple fact gives every
stone-age witchdoctor and New Age guru the hook he needs to help
him ensnare his share of the human species. Tragically, the human con-
dition that we experience isn’t enough for the human animal. With self-
interest rooted in superiority and egotism rooted in arrogance, he
declares that his uniqueness qualifies him for immortality. (“I think;
therefore, I am divine.”) Curiously, some of these same presumptuous
creatures preach that the ego “oozing like a secret sore,” and the self
that “overlays and obscures the Infinite beneath,” must be eliminated,
28 Liberty Bell / March 1989
before one can ever transcend creaturely existence and be transfigured
by that “clear day of eternity which never changes into its contrary.”
■Rather than life being “out of joint,” these self-deluded fools are “out of
joint” with life. In an attempt to shatter the bubble of the universe, they
gamble all of their living currency on a strategy that has as its founda-
tion a paranoic denial of the essential elements of the human condition:
rational self-interest and self-esteem.
Admittedly, we are not only ignorant of many things, we are faced
with the unchangeable fact that life chases death. Our perceptions
regarding the essence of the human condition can be changed, however.
We can stop whining like lonesome orphans looking for “the great
heavenly companion who understands.” We can face the fact that for
just as long as we refuse to take a moral stand against supernaturalism,
we will never grow up. We may come of age as far as years and size are
concerned; but we will never be emotionally mature. Greed for comfort-
able doctrinal retreats tend not to edification. We can work to develop
the kind of courage and moral strength that will enable us to handle the
feelings of guilt, fear, and uncertainty that leave us vulnerable to the
witchdoctor’s philosophy. We can begin to icach our children to revere
the universe and the physical body rather than revering some magical
creator of those substances; to appreciate the fact that not one single
ordinance of the Supreme Law of the universe can ever be violated
(smoking, drinking, using drugs, etc.) with impunity; to understand that
for as long as they believe in immortal souls, they will never truly
respect their mortal souls; and to realize that for as long as they worship
some divine PAPA who will make everything right in the end, they will
never truly take responsibility for their lives and their actions.
The impossible dream? Maybe. Nonetheless, I envision a future
world in which honest, fearless human beings will raise their children to
be as courageous and emotionally and morally sound as they are; a
world in which people will be willing to accept their mortal material
selves without the need to believe in immortal, non-material souls;
people who will have the courage to traverse the razor’s edge of reality,
secure in the knowledge that even though they will die without pat
answers to every probing question, they will have made the best of their
lives within the bounds of rationality rather than in the bonds of super-
stition.
If an intelligent extra-terrestrial happens to visit our little planet in
the sun before that day comes, and if he stays long enough to take a
good look around, his telepathic response to his spaceship will probably
be: “Beam me up, Zemclaw. This place is a child’s night-mare.” D
*
Liberty Lett / March 1989 29
IN CONNECTION with a memorial observation of the 50th anniver-
sary of Reichskristallnacht by the Bundestag (The western German
legislative body) a speech was given by its President which attracted
widespread attention in the world. Although such prominent Jewish
leaders as Furst and Wiesenthal were not inclined to find the speech
offensive to Jews and although it contained not the slightest denial of
the “Holocaust” material, Jenninger was forced, to his astonishment, to
resign his very important position as a result of pressure from his fel-
low members of the Bundestag and from Israel. Ironically, Jenninger
had made many trips to Israel and was a faithful minion of Israel.
The American press took some notice of the speech, typically with
just a few short quotations. I, for one, was curious to know what sort of
speech could have caused such an uproar and to see the original Ger-
man text of the speech. After vain attempts to obtain a copy of the
original text, I finally encountered it in the November issue of the im-
portant Unabhdngige Nachnchten (Postfach 400 215, D-4630 Bochum,
West Germany). The copy was postmarked 27 November but did not
reach me until 14 January.
I was astonished when I read through the 5 1/2 pages which the
text of the speech occupied. It was full of the contrition and self-flagel-
lation that typify the position of officials of the Bonn government with
regard to the history of the National Socialist period (1933-1945). Parts
of it could have been written by the worst detractors of the German
nation. There was, however a modest defense of Germans by a recita-
tion of the earlier successes of the National Socialist government,
which, Jenninger claims, seduced Germans into supporting a govern-
ment which went on to commit crimes in their name. Otherwise, Jen-
ninger interpreted German history in a manner unfavorable to
Germans. His version of history was distorted by omissions, if not
simply errors in some instances, some of which we shall point out
below in connection with specific passages in my translation.
Jenninger's speech reminded me of a sort of joke which was
30 Liberty Bell / March 1989
making the rounds in Germany after the war. It went something like
this: Who is being toughest against former Nazis? The Russians? No.
The French? No. The British? No. The Americans? No. Well, who
then? The Germans themselves!
Indeed, Germans at that time were suffering from the results of an
extremely painful, costly war fought while the National Socialist
government had been in power. During this past decade, the Second
World War, instead of receding in the awareness of the Germans,
seems to be the subject of ever more intense self-recrimination on
their part in all three German states, where there is hardly any reaily
open debate about the events and causes of the war and the nature of
National Socialism. The governments in Bonn, Berlin, and Vienna are
eager to show the world how vigorously they can repress attempts at
historical revisionism aimed at more objective versions.
Why has this self-recrimination intensified in recent years? One
factor might be the natural friction between generations, amongst a
number of factors. There are even instances where Bonn and Vienna
have taken measures against foreign revisionists who have undertaken
to save Germans from themselves as a result of a realization that the
demographic and psychological decline of the German nation con-
stitutes a harm to Western Civilization and to Aryans in general. In the
case of the Bonn government in particular, there seems to be an over-
riding fear of a boycott of German export goods, a boycott like the one
which was undertaken by Jews as early as 1933 and which could again
have a devastating effect on the German' economy, beset as it is al-
ready by an unemployment problem of some dimensions. Germany
* must export or starve, as it did during the first half of 1919 as a result
of the continued Allied blockade.
Let us now turn to my translations of selected passages from
Jenninger’s speech together with some comments on them. Readers df
the Bulletin [or of Liberty Bell\ who wish to study a copy of the original
German text should write to the Committee for the Reexamination of
History of the Second World War [or to Liberty Bell Publications, for
copies of the Jenninger speech; please include $1.50 for the copying
cost and mailing]. My own comments on the following pages are iden-
tified by being enclosed in square brackets.
Ladies and Gentlemen t The Jews in Germany and throughout the
world recall the events which took place 50 years ago today . We Germans
also remember that which took place in' our country a half century ago
and it is good that we do this in the two states on German soil This is
the case because our history cannot be split up into good and evil and the
Liberty Bell / March 1989 31
responsibility for the past cannot be distributed in accordance with the
arbitrary geographical arrangements of the postwar era .
That which transpired in Germany 50 years ; ago today had never
taken place in any civilized country ever since the middle ages . [Jen-
ninger contradicts his own statement by his later nse of the Russian
word pogrom , unless we assume that Russia was an uncivilized land in
the nineteenth century.] And, even worse : the riots were not a matter of
some sort of manifestations of a spontaneous popular anger motivated as
usual, but rather an action thought up, instigated, and promoted by lead-
ing figures of the government [This statement is perhaps the most ques-
tionable one in the whole speech. Ingrid Weckert’s book on the
Reichskristallnacht, Feuerzeichen, furnishes convincing evidence that
such leaders as Hitler, Goebbels, and Goring were appalled at the
' riots that had taken place on the night of 9-10 November 1938. Was
Jenninger objective enough to have read Weckert’s book while prepar-
ing his speech? I doubt it! For a review of Feuerzeichen, see Bulletin 31
[or Liberty Bell for January 1989]. It is inexcusable that Jenninger failed
throughout his speech to mention the humiliating murder of a German
diplomatic official in Paris and an earlier murder of a prominent Na-
tional Socialist in Switzerland in 1936, in both instances by Jews. Even
the bloody (or even bloodier) race riots that took place in Tulsa, Ok-
lahoma in 1921 are reputed to have been touched off simply by a
young Negro’s insult of a Caucasian woman.]
On the 30th of January 1933 the National Socialists had taken power
* in the German Reich . The five and one-half years between then and
November 1938 were enough to cancel out the equality achieved by Jews
during a century and a half It began with the boycott of Jewish busi-
nesses in April 1933 and the immediate forced pensioning of Jewish civil
servants . During the same year there followed the first prohibitions of
Jewish journalists and artists to practice their professions . The Nurem-
berg Laws' of 1935 made Jews second-class citizens without civil rights .
The Law for the Protection of German Blood and Honor' ushered in the
unspeakable crime of * racial shame.' [Rassenschande, i.e., miscegena-
tion. Germany was by no means the only country with laws that pro-
hibited miscegenation. Many states in the United States had laws
based on the same principle. Jenninger’s statement about the boycott
of Jewish businesses should also be challenged. In the (London) Daily
Express of 24 March 1933 there was a long, front-page article about
Jews’ plans for an international boycott of German exported goods.
32 Liberty Bell / March 1989
Liberty Bell l March 1989 33
The initial boycott of Jewish stores in Germany lasted only a day,
1 April 1933, a Saturday.]
[The Austrian magazine Sieg (Postfach 5, A-6911 Lochau, Austria,
1/1989, page 18) believes that Jenninger’ s speech was almost certainly
written by Dr. Thomas Gundelach and states that it is reputed that
Jenninger delivered the speech without having previously read it. The
following eight paragraphs of the text would seem to be the principal
cause of the howling about the speech. However, these paragraphs
contain some noteworthy and correct insights.]
Hitler's successes were perhaps even more devastating for the fate of
the German and European Jews than his evil deeds and crimes . The
years from 1933 to 1938 are something that provoke our fascination, even
from the present point of distant hindsight and with the knowledge of
what happened after that, inasmuch as there has scarcely ever ^ been in
history a parallel to Hitler's political triumphal procession during those
first years.
The reincorporation of the Saar [as a result of the plebiscite on 13
January 1935 under the supervision of the League of Nations, with ap-
proximately 90% of the votes cast in favor of the return to Germany],
the introduction of universal conscription, massive rearmament [defying
the humiliating limitations of the Versailles Treaty], signing of the
British-German naval treaty, occupation [by German armed forces] of
the [previously demilitarized] Rhineland, Olympic Summer Games in
Berlin, the annexation [AnschluC] of Austria and the [beginning of the]
i Greater German [GroBdeutsches] Reich ' and finally, just a few weeks
before the November pogroms, the Munich Agreement [involving the ap-
proval of the British, French, and Italian governments of the annexa-
tion of the Sudetenland], the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia
[involving the independence of Slovakia and the status of Bohemia and
Moravia as a German protectorate]; by this time the Versailles Treaty
was only a scrap of paper and all at once the German Reich was the
hegemonical power of the old continent [of Europe].
For the Germans, who had preponderantly sensed the Weimar
Republic as a consequence of foreign humiliations , all of this must have
seemed like a miracle . And that was not alii massive unemployment had
been turned into full employment, mass misery had been turned into
something like prosperity for the very broad masses . Instead of despair
and hopelessness, optimism and self-confidence were prevailing. Had not
Hitler made to come true that which [Emperor] Wilhelm II [reigned
1888-1918] had merely promised, namely to lead the Germans into mag-
nificent times? Was he not really selected by Providence, a leader of the
kind that is bestowed on a nation only once in a thousand years?
To be sure, in free elections Hitler had never been able to obtain for
himself a majority of the Germans . But who would doubt that in 1938
the vast majority of Germans were standing behind him and identifying
themselves with him and his policies? Certainly, some 'quarrelsome
faultfinders' (Haffner) wanted to keep things stirred up and were hounded
by the SD [Security Service] and Gestapo [Secret State Police], but
most Germans —and indeed Germans from all classes, from the middle
classes as well as from the working classes— were probably convinced in
1938 that Hitler should be viewed as the greatest statesman in our history.
And another thing must not be overlooked; all of Hitler's aston-
ishing successes were on the whole and individually a belated slap in the
face of the Weimar system . And [the] Weimar [Republic] was not only
, synonymous with weakness in the face of foreign nations, with quarrels of
political parties and changes of government, with economic misery, with
chaos and street fights and political disorder in the broadest sense, but
[the] Weimar [Republic] was of course also a synonym for democracy
and parliamentary government, for division of powers and civil rights, for
freedom of the press and assembly and finally for a maximal degree of
Jewish emancipation and assimilation .
This is to say that Hitler's successes belatedly discredited especially
the liberal system based on a parliament, the very democracy of [the]
Weimar [Republic], Under these circumstances, for many Germans there
was no longer even a question of what system was preferable. Perhaps in
some individual aspects of life people enjoyed less individual freedom
but they were, after all, getting along personally better than previously and
without any doubt the Reich was great, indeed greater and more powerful
than previously. Had not the leaders of Great Britain, France, and Italy
paid their respects to Hitler in Munich and helped him to attain a further
success, one of those which was considered impossible?
And as far as the lews were concerned, had they not assumed a role
for themselves in the past that was inappropriate for them? Did they not
finally have tq accept, for once, limitations in exchange? Had they per-
haps even deserved to have some limitations imposed on them? And,
especially, was not the propaganda in essential points— aside from wild
exaggerations not to be taken seriously— in keeping after all, with one's
own suppositions and convictions?
And if things got too bad, as in November 1938, one could, of
course, still say to himself, in the words of a contemporary, 'Of what
concern is that to us? Look away if you find it horrible . It is not our fate’
(Rauschning). [Jenninger is apparently quoting Hermann Rauschning,
Liberty Bell / March 1989 35
34 Liberty Bell/ March 1989
the author of Gesprdche tnit Hitler (Conversations with Hitler), which
has recently been proved to be a fraudulent book by the Swiss his-
torian, Wolfgang Hanel. Jenninger weakens his credibility as an his-
torian by citing such a source. See the investigation of Rauschning’s
book by Hanel published in 1984 by the Zeitgeschichtliche
Forschungsstelle Ingolstadt.]
[On the fourth page of the text, as printed in the Unabhangige
Nachrichten, Jenninger trots out the old, threadbare Freudian explana-
tion for Hitler’s hostility toward Jews, viz., a miserable childhood,
failure as an artist, sexual disturbances, etc. Such an explanation, how-
ever, could hardly be applied to the brilliantly successful American in-
dustrialist, Henry Ford. During 1920-1922 Ford subsidized an extensive
series of studies on the Jewish problem [see The International Jew: The
World's Foremost Problem , 4-volume set, approx. 1000 pages, $26. plus
postage, available from Liberty Bell Publications]. They were soon
translated into German [see Der Internationale Jude, $13.50 + postage,
available from Liberty Bell Publications] and it is apparent that they
were the most important, but by no means the only, American in-
fluence on Hitler and his NSDAP.]
[Jenninger then goes on to quote at length a vividly embellished
account of an “eyewitness” describing a mass shooting of prisoners in a
ditch. The quotation does not even specify that the victims were Jews.
Jenninger gives no source for this quotation but it would seem typical
of the sort of “evidence” presented at the Allied show trials in Nur-
emberg. Again, without giving a source, Jenninger then quotes from
document PS-1919 presented at the Nuremberg trials. Even here he
makes a distorting omission. PS-1919 is quoted in Wilhelip Staglich’s
important Der Auschwitz Mythos [available from Liberty Bell Publica-
tions, $13.00 + postage] pp. 91-92, pp. 63-65 in the English edition. It
is from a speech allegedly given by Reichsfuhrer-SS Heinrich Himmler
before an audience of SS Gruppenfuhrer in Posen on 4 October 1943,
This document is frequently quoted by Zionists because it speaks of
extirpation (Ausrottung) of the Jewish people. Staglich, however,
makes a convincing case against the authenticity of this document on
the basis of historical improbabilities in the text.] □
This article reprinted from Bulletin No. 33, published by the Committee for the
Reexamination of the History of the Second World War, Charles E. Weber, Ph.D.,
Chairman, 1628 So. College, Tulsa, OK 74104. Annual subscription to Liberty Bell
$35.00. Sample copy and copy of our extensive book list $4.00. Order from:
Liberty Bell Publications, Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA
36 Liberty Bell / March 1989
. I
HUMOR AND FILM
FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SAMMY GLICK
b y
Nicholas Carter
I s Jewish humor basically different from that of Gentiles? Do motion
pictures produced, written, and directed primarily by Jews, differ
basically from films made by Gentile artists of the medium? With little
room for doubt, the answer to both of these questions, in my opinion, is
YES.
Consider first, the concept of comedy. There is a scene in the latest
Zucker, Zucker and Abraham produced flic, “The Naked Gun,” for
, instance, that exemplifies the ambiance of Jewish humor,
A young woman, standing rather high on a ladder, is apparently
looking for something in an attic. The leading actor in the production is
standing at the foot of the ladder. From the angle of the viewer, he
could be looking right up her dress. “Nice beaver,” he casually com-
ments. A moment later, she hands down a stuffed animal —a beaver,
Now most Americans know that the word “beaver” is euphemistically
used in a descriptive sense that has only a tantalizing relationship with
the animal in question. Hence, the “humor” in the situation.
In truth, this is a splendid example of Jewish humor. It is cheap,
sordid, childish, and the kind of comedy that belongs to the Marx
Brothers, the Three Stooges, Buddy Hackett, and numerous other
Jewish comics. Curiously, most Gentile comedians, from Richard Pryor
to Robin Williams can use forbidden words and off-color jokes, and still
be charmingly acceptable. On the other hand, there are people like
Lebanese Catholic Danny Thomas and the late Myron Cohen (there are
some decent Jewish comedians) who are able to delight audiences for
lengthy periods of time without using a single off-color remark.
For the most pertinent perspective on what generally passes for
Jewish humor, however, one need look no further than an appearance
on the Johnny Carson show by Jewish actor Walter Matthau a few years
back. The very first thing Matthau said when he sat down was, “My wife
told me not to tell a toilet joke .” And then he promptly told a toilet
joke.
For a revealing perspective on the Jewish approach to films dealing
mostly with non-Jews (specifically: white Gentiles), a little fantasizing
might help. Let us suppose that a Gentile-controlled film studio in, say,
Russia, is going to produce a number of scripts dedicated to providing
Liberty Bell / March 1989 37
the world with Gentile versions of the universal Jewish lifestyle. Ergo,
consider the following scenarios:
The action of production number one— a comedy in which many of
the scenes are quick skits having nothing to do with the loosely running
story-line — takes place on a jumbo jet. In one scene, two stereotypical
Jewish children (George Burns and Barbara Streisand look-alikes, per-
haps), about ten years of age and extravagantly dressed, are seated
together. The boy is puffing on a cigar. He offers one to the little girl.
She accepts; but when he starts to clip the end for her, she reaches for
the cigar, saying, “Oh no, I prefer my cigars UNcircum-cised, like my
men.” In another scene, we meet the pilot, a stereotypical hook-nosed
Jew wearing a self-conscious grin, as if he has just been caught eating
something forbidden. He is soon disclosed as a child molester due to
his oblique references to his sexual preferences for little boys.
The locale of the second picture is a small Israeli town on the West
Bank, The town policeman has killed an Arab during the commission of
a crime. The Arab's brother, a noted terrorist, sends word to the
policeman that he, along with some of his henchmen, are coming to
avenge his brother's “murder,” Needing help, the policeman turns to
the townspeople. All of them— including his former military com-
mander, his service buddies, his relatives, his neighbors, even his wife—
are too cowardly to offer him any assistance. The film climaxes with a
battle in which the policeman, facing the Arabs alone, fights to victory.
In production number three, a wealthy Israeli newspaper owner ex-
presses his opposition in editorials to the refusal of the government to
deal with the Palestinians, to the brutalization of the Palestinians, and to
the continued reliance on American aid. In response to his; “anti-Semi-
tic” views, powerful Israelis produce a film viciously smearing him as
one of the worst human beings imaginable: cold, ruthless, friendless,
despicable, with no sense of decency and fairness; and incapable of
finding love, short of picking up women on the street. In fact, his soul is
so empty, the only comforting thing on his mind as he dies, is the name
of a boyhood toy.
The next movie is designed to degrade the Israeli military. The lo-
cale: an air base somewhere in Israel. The base commander is a
psychopath who wants to shoot any serviceman with dust on his shoes,
or a single undone button. At his elbow at all times is a rat-faced little
guy ready to cite chapter and verse from military regulations whenever
the general goes off the deep end. E.g.: “Oh no, General. We can't
shoot him for belching!” The Colonel in charge of supplies, meanwhile,
is deeply involved in the black market. In order to cover up his ac-
38 Liberty Bell / March 1989
tivities, he makes a deal with the Arabs to blow up his own supply
depot, thus ensuring that the missing items will be listed as having been
destroyed. His black market associate among the enlisted men is an
incipient Nazi who acts like a storm trooper. The base rabbi is a coward
and a bumbling fool who can't hit the ground with his hat. And the rest
of the characters are assorted criminal types and sexual perverts.
And now a film dealing with the activities taking place within a
large but modem Israeli company that employs several vice presidents
and numerous young people, including many pretty girls. The most ur-
gent business on the minds of the managerial staff, however, appears to
be the seducing of young female employees. Without the slightest shred
of common decency, they promise the girls everything for their favors,
and give them nothing in return. To avoid the public eye, as it were, the
VP's make a deal with an unmarried male employee for the purpose of
'using his dwelling for their numerous sexual liaisons.
Film number six belongs to the anti-law- and-order movie genre.
The sheriff of a small Israeli town and his deputies, capture a vi-
cious but charismatic Arab criminal, and incarcerate him in the local
jail. More interested in gaining political power than in doing his job, the
sheriff is obsessively ambitious and ruthlessly amoral. Most of the
townspeople— with one of the exceptions being the local newspaper
editor— are as corrupt and indifferent to decency as the sheriff. As the
result of his arrogant treatment of the newspaper man, his indifference
to the welfare of his men, and his plans to use the capture of the
criminal for his own political gain, his deputies turn against him and
help the criminal escape from jail. The last thing the deserted sheriff
sees as he stands in the middle of the street screaming to the high
heavens about betrayal, are his deputies driving off into the sunset with
the Arab.
Many more examples could be cited in this motion picture “hit
list;” but to continue, I suspect, would be akin to beating the proverbial
dead horse.
The purpose of these satirical exercises has been to emphasize by
example how six major American films — “Airplane,” “High Noon,”
“Citizen Kane,” “Catch 22,” “The Apartment,” and “The Posse” -
would appear to the world at large if all of the ugly people involved in
the stories were Jews rather than white Gentiles. For those who are
fortunate enough not to have wasted good money to see “Airplane,” a
couple of incidents from that flic will clarify my “jumbo jet” scenario: A
handsome Anglo pilot asks a little boy if he has ever seen a grown man
naked; and a little blonde girl comments that she likes her coffee black ,
Liberty Bell / March 1989 39
like her men. Obviously, deliberately slanted writing of this sort reaches
outside the perimeters of socially acceptable comedy for propaganda
messages that are more closely related to racial denigration than to
entertainment and enlightenment.
Is the Hollywood Writer’s Guild “practically a Semitic closed
- shop,” as a Jewish publication reported a few years back? I really don’t
know. Considering the large number of movies and TV programs that
portray Anglos in the most negative ways, however, it isn t difficult to
conclude that not only is the number of Sammy Glicks in Hollywood far
out of proportion to their numbers in our society, a goodly number of
them ate deliberately using the propaganda medium of the motion pic-
ture to express their contempt for, and hatred of, the American
majority.
For the very best in prime, Grade A, racial denigration, I refer the
reader to “Soap,” a TV series starring a large, white Gentile family,
whose members, without exception, are obscene caricatures of human
beings. The only decent person in the entire household- no coin-
cidence, to be sure— is the Black manservant.
In other words, the savaging of Anglos appears to be one of the
primary occupations of the Sammy Glicks of Hollywood. We are con-
stantly being portrayed as sex-crazed, power-warped, minority-hating,
immoral polluters of sane society. “Nashville,” “Nasty Habits,” “Roots,”
“Little Big Man,” “Dallas,” “A Woman Called Moses,” “A Wedding,”
“Mandingo,” “Buffalo Bill and the Indians,” “Carnal Knowledge,”
“Joe,” “The Border,” “Alamo Bay,” “Mississippi Burning,” and “The
Chase” merely scratch the surface of the parade of Hollywood motion
pictures that could all be subtitled “Anglos You Love To Hate.”
Of all the world’s social systems, the Western world of the white
Gentile is so distinctive in character and imposing in its duration, that it
could logically be described as the most “human” of societies, and the
most “civil” of civilizations, Nonetheless, what we frequently hear from
a disproportionate number of minority members— intellectual terrorists
who destroy with words instead of bombs— are public declarations via
novels, text books and film productions, to the effect that the “white
race” is the cancer of the human race.
Always contributing to the foundation upon which the individual
minority racist builds, is the very effective method of media propagan-
dizing known as saturation programming. We Americans are regularly
bombarded throughout the year, on both commercial and public tele-
vision, with guilt-producing dramas, documentaries, and news-film an-
thologies, that are supposed to “educate” us about past and present
40 Liberty Bell / March 1989
“white supremacist,” “anti-Semitic,” and “anti-civil rights” activism. For
forty years, Nazism has been kept alive by a continual pageantry of
programs portraying old Nazis, ex-Nazis, resurgent Nazis, neo-Nazis,
and even cloned Nazis; and the latest in a lengthy procession of assemb-
ly-line Holocaust productions is a story about an SS officer who under-
goes plastic surgery so that he can assume the identity of a Jew. What
next.. .an animated Holocaust extravaganza starring Irving Rabbit?
If the white race was generally as worthless and corrupt as the
holier-than-thou, always wronged and never wrong, minorities would
have us believe, there would be no Western civilization; no great art,
literature, music, or architecture; no great cathedrals, art galleries,
libraries, universities, or hospitals; no concept of individual rights; Noth-
ing— except a terrifying primitive world filled with collectivism and
tribalism.
Sammy Glick found the freedom and opportunity in predominantly
white, Christian America to achieve all possible success. And what does
he give us in return? Out of proportion to his numbers in our society—
the significant words are, to repeat, OUT OF PROPORTION— he
gives us an overwhelming lust to defile and destroy our civilization and
culture. Think about that the next time you see one of Sammy Glick’s
productions. d
BHBHi
inpnBgn3iinHni
oiiliii
Liberty Bell / March 1989 41
TRIAL BY JEWRY
THE
GREAT HOLOCAUST TRIALS
IN TORONTO 1983 - 1988
by David McCalden
i , i i 1 h i i ■ *
TRIAL BY JEWRY
The Great Holocaust Trials
in Toronto 1983 - 1988
by David McCalden
First Edition 1988
© Copyright 1988 by Liberty Bell Publications
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Additional copies available from;
Liberty Bell Publications
P.O. Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA
or
Truth Missions
P.O, Box 3849, Manhattan Beach CA 90266 USA
Printed in the United States of America
Red Cross Witnesses in Need of Treatment
Next up, the Crown called two witnesses from the Canadian Red
Cross Society, who might have stepped right out of an episode of Monty
Python. Their testimony was hampered by chaos and confusion; some
due to the language barrier, and some because of the misrepresentation
of one organization as another. .
The Crown first presented Ren6 de Grace, the National Director
for International Affairs of the Canadian Red Cross Society. De Grace,
a French-Canadian, told the court that his office maintained a library ot
publications and bulletins from various “Red Cross” organizations, such
as the International Committee of the Red Cross (Geneva), and the
League of Red Cross Societies, and his own Canadian Red Cross
Society. He presented into evidence an IRC bulletin dated 1 February
1978 disclaiming the “300,000 total of victims” attributed to the ICRC
by Harwood on page 30 of Did Six Million Really Die?. De Grace m
cated that the “300,000" figure came, not from the ICRC, but from a
similar organization, the International Tracing Service, based at Arolsen
in West Germany.
The relationship between the Canadian Red Cross, and the Inter-
national Committee of the Red Cross, and the International Tracing
Service, would gradually become a subject of debate; with the Crown
eventually reversing themselves, instead arguing emphatically that we
had been right in the beginning!
In cross-examination, we had Mrs. Marshall ask the witness about
the paperback book published by the ICRC entitled The Work of the
ICRC for Civilian Detainees in German Concentration Camps 1939-1945,
but although he knew of the title, he did not feel qualified to comment
on its contents. In fact, the 125-page paperback consists of extracts
from the ICRC’s 3-volume hardback series Report of the ICRC on Its
Activities During the Second World War. Revisionists point out that early
editions of the ICRC’s reports (e.g., 1946, 1947) contain very few refer-
ences to “death camps” or “gas chambers.” Only subsequent editions
include such terminology.
Monsieur De Grace had brought along with him a “German-speak-
ing” assistant, Mrs. Elisabeth Perz, who was supposed to translate for
the court the Arolsen document which did indeed cite the “3000,000"
total of victims. Unfortunately, Mrs. Perz’ German was about on a par
with M. De Grace's English. Her testimony was marred by stumblings,
mis-translations, and plain ignorance. Even Mrs. Marshall was on the
ball, when she confined her cross-examination to the following ex-
change:
Mrs. Marshall; “Do you know what [this document] is about at all?
Mrs. Perz: “No, I don't."
Mrs. Marshall: “You have no idea at all?"
L
Mrs. Perz: “I have no idea."
Mrs. Marshall: “Thank you."
The presentation by the Crown of Elisabeth Perz as both an “ex-
pert" German translator, and an employee of the “Red Cross" was in-
dicative of the cavalier attitude with which they approached this
trial— at least in its early stages.
In an effort to reclaim lost ground, the Crown Attorney, P eter Grif-
fiths, re-summoned Ren6 de Grace, to put to him some questions he
had obviously forgotten to ask him during his Examination-in-chief. In
particular, Griffiths focused on Harwood's unfortunate mistakes on
page 27 of Did Six Million Really Die?, where he misrepresented Allied
camps as German camps; and ICRC Report , Volume 1 as ICRC Report ,
Volume III. (This, and similar, errors have been cleaned up— with the
help of this author— in the latest British edition of Did Six Million Real-
ly Die?)
A Survivor Manqu^e
Reluctantly, the Crown next exhibited Mrs. Sabina Citron, the in-
stigator of the private suit against Zundel. Although Mrs. Citron's
Holocaust Remembrance Association had been expelled from the
Canadian Jewish Federation for ill-discipline, and although she profes-
sionally operated a union-busting, immigrant sweat-shop, plastics fac-
tory, Crown attorneys were so overwhelmed by her garrulous manner
that they meekly acquiesced to her arrogant demands for the largely-
Gentile Canadian government to take over her private, vengeful, specifi-
cally-Jewish law-suit, and spend taxpayers' money instead of her own, in
venting her spleen.
Every North American city has a “Sabina Citron." She has her own
maverick “survivor" organization. She presents herself as a “Holocaust
expert" for TV and radio appearances. She occasionally acts as a
docent at “Holocaust" exhibits, where she buttonholes visits with her
tales of woe. And she solicits invitations to schools and colleges, where
she is given free rein to impose her own neuroses on impressionable
children and adolescents. Unfortunately, only in Toronto is a “Sabina
Citron” taken seriously enough for the state to take over her legal ven-
dettas.
50
51
Mrs. Citron testified that she had grown up in Lodz, Poland. After
the war broke out she and her family relocated to the Jewish ghetto at
the nearby town of Kielce, and worked in a number of war-production
factories.
In July 1944— five years after the German invasion of Poland—
Sabina and her siblings were transferred to Auschwitz, in box-cars. In
sworn testimony, she testified that the 120 mile journey took “about a
week” (Prelim, p. 175).
Upon arrival at Auschwitz, she and her family were forced to take
a shower, their clothes were taken away for disinfection, and they were
given prison uniforms, Sabina was allocated prisoner number A-15134,
which was tattooed on her forearm, and embroidered on her uniform.
During five more transcript pages (pp. 177-182) Mrs. Citron
rambled on, complaining in the typical Jewish fashion about the fit of
her uniform, the size of her clogs, the space of her bunk, the quality and
frequency of her meals, and the earliness of the roll-calls. At the begin-
ning, Judge Hryciuk attempted to move things along, but to no avail.
Mrs. Citron insisted on hogging the limelight with her tales from the
Holocaust. Or perhaps, they were not totally her own: much of her
story appears to be a paraphrase of that of Kitty Hart, the British-
Jewish-Polish survivor whose memoirs have been made into both a book
( Return to Auschwitz , Athenaeum, 1983) and a TV video (Kitty: Return
to Auschwitz, Yorkshire Television, 1979).
In Kitty’s yarn, she was in the hospital block of the extermination
camp (!) when a selection for the “gas chambers” was imminent. Her
mother, who happened to be a nurse, hid her under a straw mattress (p.
105) and placed a corpse on top to hide her. In Sabina’s story, her
mother told her to hide under the bunk-boards (Prelim, p. 181) and
threw herself on top. Miraculously, both survived.
After just two weeks (Prelim, p. 182) at Auschwitz, Sabina was
transferred by passenger train to Bomblitz near Hannover, in Germany-
proper, where she worked in a munitions factory, and “couldn’t believe
[her] good luck” with the excellent accommodations.
With the war coming to an end, Sabina was transferred to the tran-
sit- or holding-camp of Bergen-Belsen. After just three weeks there, she
was ^transferred to yet another munitions factory at Elsing. Shortly after-
ward, tthe war came to an end, and Sabina was free to emigrate to
Canada.
However, immediately after the war Sabina Citron returned briefly
to Lodz in Poland to see who and what had survived. In testimony
(Prelim, p. 185) she acknowledged that “people were coming [back]
from all over.. .people who were returning were coming there because
there was. ..a small Jewish center which was receiving returning
refugees. And it was sort of holding lists of people who had already
arrived so that families could be re-united.”
In Lodz, Sabina was able to determine that both her parents and
one of her two brothers had survived the war; four out of five family
survivors certainly exceeded the average German or Polish ratio.
Whatever happened to the missing brother was never determined.
As soon as our Mrs. Marshall started to cross-examine Sabina
Citron, a curious incident took place. From the press-gallery, a
reporter, Sol Littman, passed a folded note to a court usher, who in
turn passed it to Crown prosecutor Peter Griffiths. At that time, Ditt-
man was still allegedly a reporter for the Toronto Star and the CBC-TV
Newshour ; but shortly after this incident he abandoned all pretence at
objectivity and revealed his true colors as the “Canadian” representative
of the Simon Wiesenthal Center of Los Angeles. Littman insists that he
only became a partisan on the subject of “war criminals” and their
“apologists” because the Star had assigned him to cover the extradition
case of one Helmut Rauca to West Germany. (Rauca was shipped-out
to West Germany in 1983, but died before his trial could be held.)
The court transcripts reveals that Littman only passed his note (in-
structions?) to Griffiths when the name of a fellow CBC-TV reporter
was brought up. Sabina Citron confessed on the witness stand that she
had never actually received a copy of Did Six Million Really Die? in the
mail, or seen Did Six Million Really Die? on a news-stand; in fact, she
had only been confronted with a copy of it by CBC’s Steve Peabody,
who had quizzed her on how much she was outraged by it. Thus, at a
stroke, the Crown’s argument of “mischief to the public interest” was
nullified; neither an individual TV reporter nor an individual publicity-
seeking Jewess could conceivably be regarded as “the public” — even in
the People’s Republic of Canuckistan— or so we thought!
In a rare act of courage, Judge Hryciuk publicly rebuked Littman
for his impertinence. During the lunch-break I interviewed Littman on
the subject. He complained that Hryciuk was only a “second-rate [Uk-
rainian] judge” who would never progress. Littman also objected to a
Zundelist photographer taking pictures of us, because he is a “male
model” whose features are “copyrighted”!!!
Besides becoming the “Canadian” representative of the Simon
Wiesenthal Center, Littman also published a book on the Rauca case,
entitled War Criminal on Trial, where he vocally complained that Rauca
had died in West German custody before he could receive “justice.”
52
53
» V
Revisionists got a taste of Littman’s accuracy in the Simon Wiesen-
thal Center’s Response newsletter dated February, 1988. On page 6, Litt->
man authoritatively, reported that Ernst Zundel had “married the
daughter of Canadian fascist leader Adrian Arcand.” Although Jamck
Zundel was indeed French-Canadian, and although Ernst Zundel had
gained much insight from interviews with the late Arcand, there was no
familial connection at all. Naturally, Littman never apologized for, or
withdrew, the claim. Nor was he sued for “publishing false news.”
In fact, Littman’s prestige was dramatically shattered during the.
hearing of the Deschenes Commission, which was set up to figure out
Canada’s response to the Zionist’s complaints about “Nazis amongst
US.”
Littman had insisted that the Deschenes Commission should inves-
tigate whether or not the “Doctor of Death”, Josef Mengele, had ever
emigrated to Canada. He withdrew this demand shortly after he himself
found it spurious, but the Deschenes Commission still spent two chap-
ters discussing it. Even so, at one unusual hearing, Littman was per-
sonally rebuked for wasting the Commission’s time, by an impertinent
Ottawa commissioner; naturally the commissioner issued contrite
apologies afterward.
Likewise, the Deschenes Commission gave short shrift to the rant-
ings of Saint Simon Wiesenthal himself. Saint Simon had published a list
of 217 members of the Waffen-SS Galicia Division, who “may 5 ’ have
visited Canada “since so many fellow Ukrainians lived there.” The
Commission determined that of the 217 named, 196 — or 90% — had
never set foot m Canada. Eventually, the Commission determined that
there were “twenty” suspected Nazi war criminals in Canada, and
another 200 or so in need of investigation. The first of the twenty, Imre
Finta, was charged in 1988, and his trial is due to begin in September
1989. However, this may not be so easy. The “eye-witnesses” all live
either behind the Iron Curtain in Hungary, or behind the Kosher Cur-
tain in Israel. Since the exposition of Revisionist views is illegal in both
statelets, it will be difficult for Finta’s lawyer- also now Ziindel’s
lawyer - Doug Christie, to perform effective depositions in such cir-
cumstances. After all, John Demjanjuk’s lawyer, Dov Eitain, was killed
after “falling” from a 15th floor window in Jerusalem, and his colleague
Yoram Sheftel was mutilated in an acid-attack at Eitan’s funeral.
Eitan’s defenestration immediately reminds us of the similar fate of
Czechoslovakian prime minister Jan Masaryk in 1948, and that of U.S.
Secretary of Defense James Forrestal, in May 1949. Masaryk’s death
ensured the complete Communist hegemony over his country, and
Forrestal’s sent a message to his Pentagon colleagues not to challenge
Zionist hegemony over his.
Mrs. Marshall led Citron through a tiresome recapitulation of her
wartime experiences, which didn’t seem all that different from my ovyq
mother’s account of World War Two. My Mom left school at 14 years
of age— the limit of free education in those days — and started work as a
weaver in a Belfast linen factory. When the war broke out, she and her
mother both were assigned jobs in the munitions factory of Mackie’s— a
foundry which ordinarily made-tea-drying machinery for export to
India. Although Belfast was way on the periphery of the United
Kingdom, its heavy industry— especially its ship-building, aerospace,
and munitions facilities — quickly attracted the attention of the
Luftwaffe. On the night of 7/8 April 1941, a German bombing raid
killed 755 civilians; the second-highest nightly total after London’s. Un-
doubtedly, Belfast’s dense and inadequate housing contributed to a
higher casualty toll than the much larger cities of Coventry, Liverpool,
and Glasgow.
Just as in England, plans were quickly made to evacuate Belfast
children to the safety of the countryside. However, in an uncanny echo
of German policy in Poland, the Northern Ireland Minister of Home
Affairs, Richard Dawson-Bates, pointed out that at least 5000 urban
evacuees were nevertheless “unbilletable owing to personal habits which
are sub-human camps or institutions... must be instituted for these”
(In Time of War , Robert Fisk, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983, p.
437). As New York City engineer Fritz Berg has so perceptively pointed
out (Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1988-1989, p. 433 ff), much of
the German concentration policy toward Poland’s Jewish population
was based on laws of hygiene, not the laws of racism.
(However, Belfast’s evacuation policy was short-lived. Billeting in
rural homes never amounted to much, and Mr. Dawson-Bates’ pro-
posals for “camps” were never put into action. Many Northern Ireland
Catholic families sent their children to safety in the southern Irish Free
State; although the Luftwaffe mistakenly bombed neutral Dublin
twice— in January 1941 and May 1941. [The Allies likewise bombed
neutral Switzerland.] Most Belfast families trekked to the countryside
each night to sleep in barns, under hedges, and in ditches.)
The Germans interned people for political reasons; so did the
British, who had an entire “concentration camp” consisting of several
hotels at Douglas on the Isle of Man— Sir Oswald Mosley, leader of the
British Union of Fascists, was the principal guest, even though he had
54
55
dutifully requested BUF members, such as the late Dr. Peter Peel, to
accede to their draft orders. . •
The Germans interned people for racial reasons; so did the
Americans who rounded up 150,000 Japanese — half of whom were U.S.
citizens — and shipped them off to camps in the high desert of the
Arkansas swamps. The British shipped stranded German passport-
holders— many of them Jews — to Canada, and to the Isle of Man.
The Germans invaded and occupied other nations. So did the Al-
lies; the Soviets invaded Poland (in cahoots with the Germans), and
also Finland. Britain invaded and took over Iraq. And the United States
invaded and took over Iceland and Greenland. Since Churchill and
Roosevelt were secretly collaborating to finagle the United States into
the war, U.S. troops began secretly arriving in Northern Ireland several
months before Pearl Harbor, to spec out potential military bases (After
the Battle #34). After the Japanese “sneak attack” on 7 December 1941,
Churchill formally turned over Northern Ireland to the U.S. military to
use as their European playground, prior to D-Day. In tribute to their
Ulster hospitality, the U.S. Army left behind at Belfast’s City Hall a
small monument, which bears a close resemblance to a 4-foot tall Gil-
lette shaving stick.
A couple of years before she passed away, I managed to take my
Ma to see the movie Yanks which, she told me, accurately depicted—
despite its left-wing bias -the relationship between the British citizenry
and the U.S. soldiers, who were widely regarded as being “over-paid,
over-sexed, and over here!” Although the older generation pretend that
they are more righteous and less “sinful” than their “swinging sixties”
offspring, it is common knowledge that during World War Two every
belligerent nationality had a tendency to engage in end-of-the-world
sexual antics. In Belfast, afternoon tea dances were popular during the
war because so many women, like my mother, worked the night-shift.
Although she dated, several GIs-including a Brooklyn Jew by the name
of Silver— my Ma assured me that none of these relationships was ever
consummated. After my Dad returned from his wartime service in the
Aldershot cookhouse, suffering severe potato-peeler nicks and cuts, he
married her, virgo intacto .
Bearing all this background in mind, it is difficult to consider Mrs.
Sabina Winter-Citron’s wartime anecdotes as anything out of the ordi-
nary. She herself confirmed that she only spent two weeks at the “mill
of death” Auschwitz, without providing any explanation as to her
miraculous survival, apart from her “hiding under the bed-boards”
scenario (Prelim, p. 181), Since many sources insist that Auschwitz was
indeed a pure “extermination plant,” Mrs. Citron’s testimony con-
tradicts their credibility, or vice versa. However, it must be stated that
Mrs. Winter-Citron appeared to give more honest testimony than some
of her peers. She admitted to brief, fortnight stays at both Auschwitz
and Belsen; to transportation in passenger trains; and to (non-lethal)
delousing procedures; and to her refusing to work and not being
punished (p. 181, p. 192).
Unlike many of the “fishing yarns” told by her kinsmen, Mrs.
Citron’s narrative struck me as fairly honest, and free of significant ex-
aggeration, or fantasy. In fact, it was precisely because her testimony
was so banal that the Crown decided not to re-exhibit her at the main
trial, which would begin the following January 1985.
Obviously, Judge Hryciuk was un-nerved by the absence of Holo-
caust horrors from Mrs. Citron’s testimony; especially as she was the
original Complainant. He summoned both attorneys into his chambers,
and apparently insisted that the Crown should exhibit some more sen-
sationalistic witnesses, and then wrap things up as quickly as possible.
He had already made up his mind that Ernst Ziindel had a case to
answer.
The hearing resumed on Tuesday 26 June 1984 at 10:00 A.M., with
another Holocaust survivor, Arnold Friedman.
Like so many “Holocaust survivors,” Friedman originated in the
area of the Carpathian Mountains, which straddle the border of
Czechoslovakia, Poland, Romania, and the USSR. Carpathian “sur-
vivors” figure largely in “Holocaust” anecdotes, largely because they
were usually not interned until Spring 1944; quite late in the War.
Besides Friedman, other Carpathian survivors include: Mel Mer-
melstein (from Munkacs), Lili Jacob-Meier (from Bilke), Elie Wiesel
(from Sighet), Emil Hecht (from Svalvava), Robert "Maxwell” (from
Solotvino), Filip Muller (from Sered), Rudolf Vrba (from Trnava), and
Kitty Felix-Hart (from Bielsko).
Munkacs (various spellings) was the “capital” of the Carpathians, a
RUritania-type district which had changed hands on an almost annual
basis for centuries. During most of the war, it belonged to Hungary,
which was allied to Germany, but for purely pragmatic reasons. Even-
tually, the Germans grew tired of their bumbling, and took over the
Budapest r6gime. Before long, they started rounding up Jews from the
outlying villages, collecting them at industrial rail-yards, before shipping
them to industrial complexes like Auschwitz, which was desperately
short of labor.
56
57
Although many Jews in the provincial parts of Hungary were quick-
ly rounded up and shipped out, negotiations between Budapest’s weal-
thier, urban Jews and the Nazi occupiers led to a curious arrangement
whereby prominent Jews would not be drafted if they could come up
with the necessary bribes. A Jewish emissary, Joel Brand, was sent to
neutral Turkey to negotiate a tripartite agreement between the German
embassy, the Allied embassies, and the Zionist organizations, which
would allow Hungary’s Jews to emigrate peacefully to Palestine, in
return for the Germans receiving money and desperately needed trucks.
(This was not the first time during the war that Jewish communities
had entered into negotiations with the Nazis. On 11 January 1941 the
Stem Gang [including the current prime minister, Yitzhak “Shamir”
Yezernitzky] wrote to the German embassy in Turkey offering a Nazi-
Zionist military alliance, in return for first dibs on Palestine. Earlier
still, American Zionist organizations in 1933 negotiated a Transfer
Agreement with the Nazis, whereby German manufactured goods could
be exported to Palestine, so long as German Jews were allowed out
also.)
Listening to Arnold Friedman’s testimony in Toronto, for a mo-
ment I thought I was hearing Mel Mermelstein of California. Friedman
works at a lumberyard; Mermelstein owns a lumberyard. Friedman was
16 in 1944; Mermelstein was 18. Friedman had four siblings; Mer-
melstein had three siblings. Friedman was initially interned at the rail
yards of the Munkacs brickworks; so, too, was Mermelstein. Friedman
was shipped to Auschwitz-Birkenau; so was Mermelstein. Friedman’s
train took the by now obligatory “one week” to wend its way to
Auschwitz; Mermelstein’s must have been an express, taking only “three
days” to cover the 250 miles from Munkacs.
The older inmates -the kapos -would torment the teenage Fried-
man by telling him that his “friends just went to Heaven”, pointing out
the “flames. ..spewing out of.. .the crematorium” (Prelim, p. 206).
Likewise, the kapos told the teenage Mermelstein that if he didn’t work
hard he would “come out like smoke” (By Bread Alone , p. 113).
Both Friedman and Mermelstein came up with the most bizarre
“Wieselian” scenarios. Friedman insisted that the teenage inmates
could tell the nationality of the gasses by determining the color of the
crematorium flames and smoke; apparently skinny Polish Jews pro-
duced red flame, whereas fat Hungarian Jews produced yellow flame.
However, each time Friedman repeatedly tried to introduce this novel
scientific theory, Crown prosecutor Peter Griffiths would try to head
him off at the pass, being only too aware that such crackpot allegations
could only dissuade a jury of the witness’s credibility. (See: Preliminary
p. 206, pp. 213-214; and especially EZ#1, p. 326, where Griffiths asked
for a recess as soon as the incorrigible Friedman started yet again his
“colored smoke” thesis!)
Likewise, Mel Mermelstein’s book By Bread Alone insists (p. 115)
that:
Suddenly the road burst upon the scene — a scene right out of
Dante's Inferno . Ahead were three huge pits dug deep into the
ground. In each a fire was raging. Around the flaming pits naked men
were running in an endless circle. All around I could see SS guards
and kapos swinging their leather whips and driving the prisoners from
behind into the pits. I couldn’t believe my eyes.
I kept pushing myself away from the pit but something kept draw-
ing me back. I was torn between two worlds, the living and the dead.
I pushed myself closer to the edge of the pit. My God, I could see
humans in the fire, writhing and moaning.
No, doubt, this excerpt helps to explain why Mermelstein has been
seeing a psychiatrist for some twenty years, and why he makes repeated
annual visits to Auschwitz. He has been to Auschwitz— the scene of
Jewish “destruction” — almost twenty times, but has visited Israel — the
scene of Jewish “salvation” — only two or three times.
Mermelstein’s scenario is completely implausible. The water-table
at Birkenau is so high that any “deep pit” would immediately flood with
water. (The “ultra-methodical” Germans were so clever that they built
Birkenau on a swamp; hence the repeated epidemics.) Even in the best
of conditions, it is next to impossible to bum anything in a pit. Ever try
burning a dead pet, or leaves, or vegetable waste, in a pit? Even with
gasoline or kerosene propellants, all that happens is that the surface
gets scorched, and the fire goes out. Any fire needs a draught under-
neath. Pits do not have air intakes from underneath. Ergo, Mermelstein
is either a liar or a nut.
Additionally, what possible motive would the Germans have had for
chasing naked Jews around blazing pits? Something’s wrong some-
where. I would suggest that Mermelstein’s imagery has more to do with
his religious upbringing than it does with empirical reality.
At the main trial EZ#1 we taxed Friedman on his “colored smoke”
theories, and after considerable effort, he finally admitted that during
his time at Auschwitz he had “listened to other people,..maybe I would
have attached more credibility to your [explanation] than theirs, but at
the time I accepted theirs” (EZ#1, p, 445).
Friedman’s admission at the main trial caused a sensation through-
out the Canadian media, and the Holocaust industry. We’ll get to those
58
59
developments in sequence. Right now, I’d just like to draw attention to
the uncanny synchronicity between the symbolic flaming/smoking
chimneys/pits” of Mermelstein/Friedman etc. with the yarns presented
in that other book of Jewish fairy tales, the Holy Bible,
According to Jeremiah 7:31, when the Jews were in exile in Babylon
they eagerly worshiped the Baylonian’s fire-god Moloch, by sacrificing
their babies in a “gas oven.”
Deuteronomy 4:23 tells us that “the Lord thy God is a consuming
fire; even a jealous God,” Deuteronomy 29:20 elaborates that “the Lord
and his jealousy shall smoke against that [sinner].” Nahum 1:6 tells us
that God’s “fury is poured out like fire.” II Samuel 22:9 insists that
“there went up smoke out of [God’s] nostrils, and fire out of his mouth
devoured; coals were kindled by it.” If we are to believe Daniel 4:26, the
Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar ordered everyone to worship his gold-
en statue: when three Jewish advisors refused, they were thrown into a
blazing gas-oven, pre-heated to seven times its regular temperature.
Miraculously, the three Hebrews were seen to walk around, unsinged,
inside the furnace, in the company of the Messiah himself. Once they
were released from this magickal oven, King Nebuchadnezzar naturally
had the three Jews promoted; he had obviously never heard of the
Canadian-Jewish debunker of “psychics, ESP, and magick”: The Amaz-
ing Randi, who writes frequently for Free Inquiry and The Humanist.
To be continued in the next issue of Liberty Bell.
DOES THE WEST HAVE THE WILL TO SURVIVE?
That is the obvious question posed by Jean Raspail's terrifying novel of
the swamping of the White world by an unlimited flood of non-White
"refugees,” But there is also a less obvious and even more fundamen-
tal' question: Must Whites find their way to a new morality and a new
s^rtt^!f^ ; t|f1orclor to face the moral challenges of the present and
ovefebme tljem? THE CAMP OF THE SAINTS is the most frightening
bpqk you will evor read, it is frightening because it is utterly believable.
The armada of refugee ships in Raspail’s story is exactly like the one
that dumped 1 50,000 Cubans from Fidel Castro's prisons and insane
■asylums on our shores, in 1 980 — : except this time the armada is from.
: j jl, ; ti m es as large a population. And it is only the
first arrpsda of many. If any book will awakon White Americans to the
danger they face from uncontrolled immigration, it is THE CAMP PF
TfTfE SA/^T$. Fob your copy (Order No; 3014) : send $9.50 (which Ip*
aVa" liberty bell publications
For postage and handling please add:
On domestic orders, $1,50 for orders under $10.00, 15% of order total for
orders over $10,00. On orders from abroad $2.00 or 20% respectively.
Sample copy of our monthly magazine Liberty Beil and copy of our huge
Book List containing hundreds of "Eye-Openers”, $4.00. Subscription for
12 hard-hitting, fact-packed issues $35.00. Order from:
LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS
Postoffice Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA
THE ANTI-HUMANS
by D. Bacu (307 pp.' hb. $7.00) describes what was done to the young men
whom Corneliu Z. Codreanu, the founder of the Legionary Movement in
Romania, inspired, when, seven years after his brutal murder, Romania was
delivered to the Bolsheviks. They were subjected to what is the most fully docu-
mented Pavlovian ‘experiment 1 on a large number of human beings, it Is likely
that the same techniques were used on many American prisoners in Korea and
Vietnam. The Anti-Humans is a well-written document of great historical and
psychological importance. Reading it will be an emotional experience you will
not forget. ("A sequel to Orwell’s 1 984" -R.S.H. "A searing expose of Red be-
stiality I "-Dr. A.J. Appp). Order #01013. Single copy $7.00, 3 for $15.00.
For postage and handling please add:
On domestic orders, $1.50 for orders under $10.00, 15% of order tota! for orders
over $10.00. On orders from abroad $2,00 or 20% respectively.
Sample copy of our monthly magazine Liberty Beil and copy of our huge Book
List containing hundreds of "Eye-Openers”, $4.00. Subscription for 12 hard-hit-
ting, fact-packed issues $35.00. Order from:
LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS
Postoffice Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA r_;
I 1 - T< - - . ~ ■ - — " '
Liberty Bell / March 1989 55
60
JEWS
mm
THE NEW YORK TIMES, MONDAY, 1ANUAR Y 9, 198 ?
3 Face Jail
In F r aud
Of Medicaid
BySELWYN RAAB
Sheldon Weinberg owned a modest dress
shop in Brooklyn before he and his sons
branched off into Medicaid ventures. Their
new business quickly brought them the lav-
ish trappings of success: .six-figure in-
comes, a yacht, a $100,000 Rolls-Royce,
apartments in Trump Tower, a butler, a
maid and a $2.5 million home In Florida.
But that wealth, prosecutors say, .was
hardly created by the delivery of medical
services to poor people, but by a $16 million
fraud, the largest theft of Medicaid funds,
officials say, since the program began 22
years ago.
The Weinbergs, the prosecutors say, oper-
ated a sophisticated computerized system
' of fraud that included the submission of
381,000 fake claims to the state and pay-
ments of $5,000 a week to a dentist to aid in
the scheme. One son was said to have used
part of one clinic as an office for a commodi-
ty-trading business.
; Tomorrow, Mr. Weinberg, 64 years old,
and his sons, Jay, 35, and Ronald, ^2, will be
sentenced in State Supreme Court in Brook-
lyn for the fraud, which took place over
seven years at clinics in the Bedford-Stuyve-
sant and Bushwlck sections of Brooklyn. '
Roller-Coaster Rise and Fall
A portrait of the Weinbergs’ roller-
coaster financial rise and fall emerged from
court and legal documents and from inter-
views with friends and former business as-
sociates of the three men.
It showed a failure by state supervisory
agencies to closely monitor the operation
and detect the fraud. It also raised questions
about the licensing and monitoring of large
outpatient centers. Background checks of
owners of Medicaid clinics are rarely con-
ducted by the State Health Department or.
the Social Services Department after clinics
are licensed, state officials said. State law
allows investors without health-service ex-
perience to operate Medicaid clinics.
For example, Jay and Ronald Weinberg
continued to run the clinics after they were
convicted in state court? in the early 1980 s
of financial crimes unrelated to Medicaid
fraud. The brothers were on court-ordered
probation while co-administrators of the.
clinics. At a trial on the fraud charges in
November, defense lawyers contended
that hone of the Weinbergs had stolen a
penny. The lawyers described the
Weinbergs as .victims of unscrupulous
employees who engineered the frauds
for their own profit and of other em-
ployees who testified falsely out of ha-
tred for the sons,
But James A. Durkin, who is in
charge of the state agency that super-
vises Medicaid payments, said: "It
was'an unprecedented scam in size and
sophistication. They used an ingenious
trick, a computerized system to invent
phantom records and services for ac-
tualpatients.”
Mr, Durkin, the director'of audit and
quality control for the Social Services
Department, said that his unit has de-
vised new ways to detect abuses by
large Medicaid providers, partly be-
cause of the Brooklyn case.
The efforts, he noted, include com-
puterized verification that a patient ac-
tually visited a clinic at a specific time
and random checks by mail with pa-
tients to check if bills are valid.
Assets Have Been Seized
Officials in the Social Services De-
partment and the State Health Depart-
ment, which licenses medical centers,
said they were unaware of the sons'
convictions. Both had been convicted of
failure to pay bills. In addition, Jay
Weinberg was convicted of writing bad
checks and of violating Security and
Exchange Commission laws by failing
to register as a broker.
56 Liberty Bell / March 1989
The state's Special Prosecutor for
Medicaid fraud, Edward J. Kurfansky,
began an investigation of the Wein-
bergs in 1986 only after a former em-
ployee of their clinic in Bedford-Stuy-
vesant was arrested in another case
and, in a plea agreement, provided in-
formation on the Weinbergs.
Under court orders, Mr. Kuriansky's
office has seized from $5 million to $6
million in assets held by the Weinberg
family. More assets are being sought,
but it is unlikely that the full $16 million
will be recovered, an official said.
The Weinbergs were indicted in 1987.
In November 1988, a jury found each
defendant guilty on multiple counts of
grand larceny, conspiracy to defraud,
of filing false Instruments and of -falsi-
fying business records.
Prosecutors from Mr. Kuriansky’s
office charged that the three then had
participated in the submission of
381,000 fake claims to the Social Serv-
ices Department from 1980 to 1987. The
bills were for fictitious examinations
and medical services for 3,000 patients
enrolled in the Medicaid program who
had sought treatment at the two clinics.
Medicaid pays physicians, dentists
and health-care centers for the care of
low-income and welfare patients. The
Federal Government pays 50 percent
of the cost and state and local gover-
nments pay the remainder.
The Weinbergs, through their law-
yers, declined to be interviewed.
Sheldon Weinberg, according to
friehds, grew up in the Bensonhurst
section of Brooklyn, where his father,
Phillip, owned Phillip’s Dress Shop in
Bath Beach. Sheldon took over the shop
at 86th and Bay 25th Streets after his
father retired in the early 1960’s.
Friends said that Mr, Weinberg, and
his wife, Roslyn, raised Jay and Ronald
in a large house in Manhattan Beach,
about five miles from the family’s
dress shop. Although, as teen-agers and
young men, the sons had worked in the
shop and in the.dress business they had
no desire to work in the garment indus-
try, the friends recalled.
In 1975, when his lease expired, Shel-
don Weinberg left the dress business.
Former associates of Mr. Weinberg
said Jay convinced his father to invest
in a Medicaid center.
With a $400,000 loan, Sheldon Wein-.
berg In 1976 organized the Bedford-
Stuyvesant Health Care Corporation
and built the first clinic at 1413 Fulton
Street. He also hired a professional
staff to provide medical services.
Later, the corporation with another
$400,000 loan, opened a-satellite clinic
at 331 Knickerbocker Avenue in Bush-
wick.
A year after the opening of the Bed-
ford-Stuyvesanl clinic, Sheldon and
Roslyn Weinberg sold their Manhattan
Beach home- and bought a .house,
valued at $500, 0Q0, with a private dock,
in Hewlitt Bay Park, L.I. Mr. Weinberg
and Jay also acquired a $55,000, 34-foot
yacht, which they named The Corsair.
In. August 1982, at a hearing con-
ducted by the State Health Department '
over allegations of lax medical condi-
tions at’ the Bedford-Stuyvesant center,
Sheldon Weinberg said he took control
of the clinic In 1981 to iron out manage-
ment problems. "I threw both my sorts
out,’’ he said at the hearing^
An examiner for the Health Depart-
ment found that medical standards at
the center were acceptable and It was
permitted to continue operating.
Home in Boca Raton ,
Prosecution witnesses at the fraud
trial in November testified that both
sons were actively involved with the
Bedford-Stuyvesant center. Prosecu-
tors asserted that most of the frauds
concerned billings from that clinic.
In 1983 Sheldon Weinberg and his
wife mpved from Long Island and built
a home at the St. Andrews Country
Club in Boca Raton, Fla. The home is
now appraised at $2.5 million. In Flor-
ida, Mr, Weinberg bought a $100,000
Rolls Royce, a $70,000 ’custom-built
Zimmer automobile that resembled a
1930's-sly!e limousine and a $40,000.
Corvette, court records said.
Mr. Weinberg and Jay also rented
luxury apartments on the 63d floor of
Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue near
57th Street. Sheldon Weinberg was pay-
ing $180,000-a-year in rent In 1987,
In 1987, Jay was indicted on charges
that he arranged a fire in 1983 that de-
stroyed records at the Bedford-Stuyve-
sant clinic. He is awaiting trial on
charges of arson and of collecting
$50,000 in fraudulent insurance claims,
A key prosecution witness at the
fraud trial was David Z. Beldengreen, a
Manhattan dentist who had been em-
ployed at the Bedford-Stuyvesant cen-
ter from 1979 to 1984. He testified that
at the direction of the defendants he
"created”, thousands of fake bills for
Liberty Bell f March 1989 57
Medicaid patients and was paid at least
$ 5,000 a week for doing so. .
Dr. Beldengreen, in exchange for
possible leniency in an unrelated
$450,000 Medicaid fraud, touched off
the investigation of the Weinbergs.
After he was arrested in 1986, the den-
tist told prosecutors in Mr. Kurlansky’s
office about the irregularities at the
Bedford-Stuyvesant clinic.
Dr, Beldengreen is awaiting sentenc-
ing after pleading guilty to grand lar-
ceny and promising to make restitution
of $60,000 to the state in his own case.
At their peak, from 1984 to 1986, the
Weinbergs employed about 25 doctors
full and part-time and about 25 other
employees. The clinics generated up to
$200,000 a week in fake claims, accord-
ing to evidence presented by Richard S.
Harrow, the lead prosecutor.
From 1980 to 1987, the clinics got
about $15 million for genuine Medicaid
services, prosecutors said. Mr. Durkin
maintained that the submission of
about 50 percent in genuine bills helped
to conceal the fake claims.
‘Obnoxious, Spoiled Young Men’
Former employees of the Bedford-
Stuyvesant clinic testified that Jay
Weinberg operated a commodity-trad-
ing company on the second floor of the
clinic and that his employees were paid
from the clinic's payrolls.
Ronald Weinberg, according to testi-
mony, also apparently violated the
Medicaid reimbursement regulations
•by using the clinic as a garage and of-
fice for another family business, a
limousine-rental service,
None of the Weinbergs testified .it
the trial. Sheldon Weinberg’s lawyer,
Maurice H. Sercarz, in his summation,
portrayed Sheldon Weinberg as a
“man of means" who had bona fide in-
vestments that enabled him to lead a
“high life."
Mr. Sercarz asserted that the former
employees were “eager to twist the
truth“ in their testimony for the prose-
cution because they disliked Jay and
Ronald Weinberg, whom he described
as “obnoxious, spoiled young men."
Sheldon and Jay Weinberg, who were
convicted of first-degree grand -lar-
ceny, face maximum sentences of 25
years, Ronald Weinberg, . who was
found guilty of second-degree grand
larceny, faces a maximum tehm of 15
years. They will be sentenced by Jus-
tice Ruth Moskowitz.
Like Father (Sheldon)...
-rrr-
Like Son (Jay)...
Like Son (Ronald).
THE NEW YORK TIMES , WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 11 /9SV
Father Jumps
Bail in Fraud
On Medicaid
Faced Prison Sentence
— 2 Sons Given Terrtis
BySELWYN RAAB
On the day of his sentencing for partici-
pating in a $16 million Medicaid fraud, She!- *
don Weinberg failed to show up In a Brook-
lyn court yesterday and was declared a fugi-
tive from justice.
As authorities began an international
search for Mr. Weinberg, he and his two
sons received prison terms for their roles in
the largest theft of Medicaid funds since the
program began 22 years ago. Investigators
said Mr. Weinberg, who was free on $250,000
ball, and his wife, Roslyn, had disappeared
with most of their belongings from ‘their
rented house in Lawrence, L.I, • .
An empty safe, 25 pairs of men and
women's shoes, towels from the Helmsley
Palace Hotel and several of Mrs. Wein-
berg's dresses were all that remained in the
house, an investigator said.
Mr. Weinberg, who is 64 years old, was
sentenced in absentia to 7 to 21 years in
prison. One son, Jay, 35, whom prosecutors
described as the "mastermind” of the
scheme, was sentenced to 8VS to 25 years,
the maximum that could be Imposed.
Another son, Ronald, 42, was sentenced to
5 to 15 years.
Up to $6 million of the family’s assets
have been seized under court order.
Judge Defends Ball Decision
Justice Ruth Moskowitz imposed the sen-
tences in State Supreme Court. When the
three men were convicted on charges of
grand larceny and conspiracy In November,
she had denied a prosecution request that
she revoke Sheldon Weinberg^s bail and jail
him until sentencing. In explaining her deci-
sion yesterday, Justice Moskowitz said she
had "bent over backwards to be fair" to Mr,
Weinberg, who had no previous convictions.
"He has spoken loud and clear and told
this court that he is leaving only his shoes
behind," she said after issuing a warrrant
for his arrest.
'Edward J. Kuriansky, the special state
prosecutor for Medicaid fraud, said Mr.
Weinberg’s flight "is his final act of disre-
sprect for our system oflaw."
Lawyers for the three defendants, la ask-
ing for leniency for their clients, each placed
the prime responsibility for the Medicaid
frauds on other members of the family.
Sheldon Weinberg's lawyer said the .sons
had initiated and carried out the schemes,
and lawyers for each son named the father
or the other brother as the chief instigator.
"Wherever he is now, he is living in hell,"
Maurice H. Sercarz, Sheldon Weinberg’s
lawyer, said of his client. "His sons are In
prison and wife has been wrecked by what
be has done."
Later, outside court, Mr. Sercarz said he
believed Sheldon Weinberg had fled because
he thought his wife_might suffer a physical
or mental breakdown if her husband
were Imprisoned.
Mr. Weinberg and his two sons ran'a
dress shop in the Balh Beach section of
Brooklyn before 1976, when they began
opening medical clinics, primarily for
Medicaid patients, In the Bedford-Stuy*
vesant and B.ushwick sections.
None of them had medical training
or experience. They hired physicians
and dentists to treat impoverished pa-
tients who qualified for Medicaid.
At the trial, prosecutors presented
evidence that, from 1980 to 1987, the
Weinbergs were paid for 381,000 fake
Medicaid claims totalling mere than
$16 million.
Trump Tower Apartment
Court records and a pre-sentencing
report by Mr. Kurlansky's office said
that, after opening the clinics, Sheldon
Weinberg left Brooklyn for lavish
homes on Long Island; in Manhattan
and In Boca Raton, Florida. When they
were indicted in 1987, Sheldon WeirP
berg and his wife lived, in a Trump
Tower apartment that rented for
$180,000 -a year and had a fountain In
the living room. Their son Jay lived
next door In one that rented for $48,000.
JustJce.Moskpwitz said she hoped the
long sentences would send Medicaid
providers a "loud and clear message"
that "if you steal from the state you
will be punished."
Jay Weinberg, who is already serv-
ing up to four years for failing to file
state income- tax returns, pleaded
guilty yesterday to arson. He said a fire
in 1983 at the Bedford-Stuyvesant clinic
was arranged by his father to destroy
Medicaid records. He was given the
maximum sentence on that charge:
three years, to run concurrently with
the fraud and conspiracy sentences.
His brother Ronald Weinberg, who
had been free ort $100,000 bail, Was
jailed after the Sentencing yesterday.
Last Seen Thursday
The chief prosecutor, Richard Har-
58 Liberty Bell / March 1989
Liberty Bell / March 1989 59
row, said thal Sheldon Weinberg was
also suspected of stealing $1 million
from an employee’s pension fund at the
Medicaid clinics and that Ronald Wein-
berg faced tax-evasion charges.
An investigator in the Medicaid
fraud prosecutor's office, John Lydon,
said yesterday that Sheldon and Roslyn
Weinberg were last seen by friends at
'their home at 280 Narragansett Avenue
Jn Lawrence on Thursday.
Mr. Weinberg's passport was confis-
cated when he was indicted in 1987* but
investigators said they suspected he
had obtained another one under a ficti-
tious name.
TUB NEW YORK TIMES , FRIDAY, JANUARY 13, 1989
Pro-Israel Lobbyists
WASHINGTON, Jan. 12 (AP) — For-
mer United Stales official's filed a com-
plaint today against an influential pro-,
Israel lobbying group and 53 political
action committees, charging they had
violated Federal elect ion laws.
The complaint, filed with the Federal
Flection Commission, charges thal the
'American Israel Public Affairs Com-
mittee has overstepped its I- ‘gal
hounds as a lobbying group by working
id elect or defeat political candidates
based on their positions toward Israel.
The complaint said that the commit-
lee channeled money and volunteers to
such campaigns in violation of its
legistered purpose as a lobbyist. The
committee, which in the past has
denied such activities, declined to dis-
cuss the details of the complaint filed
■ today, citing F.F.C. regulations on con-
fidentiality.
Those who filed the complaint in-
clude George Ball, Under Secretary of
Slate; James Akins, former Ambassa-
dor to Saudi Arabia; Andrew Killgore,
former Ambassador to Qatar; Adm.
Robert J. Hanks, retired, who headed
the Navy's Middle Fast Tusk Force;
Richard Curtiss, a former chief inspec-
tor of the United States Information
Agency, ant! Paul Findley, a former
Representative from Illinois who con-
tends he was defeated in 15182. because
of a campaign by the pro-Israeli lobby-
ing group.
Action Sought by F.E.C.
The complaint, researched by the,
American Arab Anti-Discrimination
Committee, which is a major Arab-
American organization, asks the elec-
tion commission to force the public af-
fairs committee to register as a politi-
cal action committee. Jf the group did
so, it would have to file reports on its
activities with the election commis-
sion.
This could hamper the effectiveness
of the lobbying group, which operates
behind the scenes to recruit support fur
Israel, the largest recipient of United
States aid with $3 billion annually, and
to oppose weapons sales to Arab coun-
tries.
In a statement, one of the. plaintiffs,
Mr. Curtiss, spoke of the lobby’s "for-
midable. ability to mobilize congres-
sional support" and said the ability
Face Charge
on Election Role
was "based not upon an appeal to the
American national interest but upun
Threats by a special interest that has
resorted to conspiracy and collusion."
Dispute Has Long History
A statement by the public affairs
committee said its "members proudly
participate in the American political
process and do so within the law," add-
ing, "We are confident the F.F.C. will
expeditiously cun cur."
Mr. Curtiss and others have long
argued that Washington's policy is
skewed in Israel’s favor to the detri-
ment of United Slates standing in the
Arab world, both politically and eco-
nomically.
There arc only a handful of pro-Arab
political action committees in the
Untied Stales and they are outspent as
much as 10-to-l by the pro-Israel
groups.
The complaint, the first against ihc
public affairs committee In its 15-ycnr
history, also charges thal the group
coordinates the activities of dozens of
political action committees and uses
• them to channel money to candidates.
The complaint cites two ; internal
memos from the public affairs com-
mittee, one of which urges a colleague
to insure that pro-Israel political action
committees channel contributions lo
certain Senate candidates.
The petition also seeks to prove collu-
sion between the public affairs com-
mit te.e and 53 pro- Israel political uci-
iion committees through their common
cause and an overlap of their officials.
11 is not uncommon in Washington
for directors of political action commit-
tees to be active on boards of special in-
terest groups or corporations,
if the charge of collusion is accepted
by the election commission, it could
find that the political action commit-
tees exceeded their contribution limits
because the law treats all contributions
by affiliated committees as though
they were made by a single group.
60 Liberty Bell / March 1989
KEEP THE LIBERTY BELL RINGING!
Please remember: Our Fight Is Your fight! Donate whatever you
can spare on a regular- monthly or quarterly- basis. Whether it is
$2., $5., $20., or $100. or more, rest assured it is needed here and
will' be used in our common struggle. If you are a businessman,
postage stamps In any denomination are a legitimate business ex-
pense -and we need and use many of these here every month -
and will be gratefully accepted as donations .
Your donations will help us spread the Message of Liberty and
White Survival throughout the land, by making available additional
copies of our printed material to fellow Whites who do not yet know
what is in store for them.
Order our pamphlets, booklets, and, most importantly, our
reprints of revealing articles which are ideally suited for mass dis-
tribution at reasonable cost. Order extra copies of Liberty Bell for
distribution to your circle of friends, neighbors, and relatives, urging
them to subscribe to our unique publication. Our bulk prices are
shown on the inside front cover of every issue of Liberty Bell.
Pass along your copy of Liberty Bell, and copies of reprints you
obtained from us, to friends and acquaintances who may be on our
“wave length," and urge them to contact us for more of the same.
Carry on the fight to free our White people from the shackles of
alien domination, even if you can only join our ranks in spirit. You
can provide for this’by bequest. The following are suggested forms
of bequests which you may include in your Last Will and Testament:
1 . 1 bequeath to Mr. George P. Dietz, as T rustee for Liberty Bell
Publications, P.O. Box 21 , Reedy WV 25270 USA, the sum of $ . . .
.... for general purposes.
2. 1 bequeath to Mr. George P. Dietz, as Trustee for Liberty Bell
Publications, P.O. Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA, the following
described property for general purposes.
DO Y OUR PART TODAY-HELP FREE OUR WHITE
RACE FROM ALIEN DOMINA TION!