www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Full text of "Liberty Bell archive"

See other formats





THE EDUCATION OF 
A CONSERVATIVE 


ABOUT THE AUTHOR; Dr, Revilo 
Pendleton Oliver, Professor of the 
Classics at the University of Illinois 
for 32 years, is a scholar of inter- 
national distinction who has writ- 
ten articles in four languages for the 
most prestigious academic publi- 
cations in the United States and 
Europe. 

During World War II, Dr. Oliver 
was Director of Research in a high- 
ly secret agency of the War Depart- 
ment, and was cited for outstanding 
service to his country. 

One of the very few acade- 
llgllB* mi clans who has been outspoken in 

his opposition to the progressive 
defacement of our civilization, Dr. Oliver has long insisted that the 
fate of his countrymen hangs on their willingness to subordinate 
their doctrinal differences to the tough but idealistic solidarity 
which is the prerequisite of a Majority resurgence. 

SOME QUOTABLE QUOTES FROM AMERICA >S DECLINE 
On the 18th Amendment (Prohibition); “Very few Americans were* 
sufficiently sane to perceive thc f they had repudiated the American 
conception of government am* had replaced it with the legal 
principle of the ‘dictatorship f the proletariat/ which was the 
theoretical justification- of the Jews’ revolution in Russia.” 

On Race; “We must further understand that all races naturally 
regard themselves as superior to all others. We think Congoids 
unintelligent, but they feel only contempt for a race so stupid or 
craven that it fawns on them, gives them votes, lavishly subsidizes 
them with its own earnings, and even oppresses its own people to 
curry their favor. We are a race as are the others. If we attribute to 
ourselves a superiority, intellectual, moral, or other, in terms of our 
own standards, we are simply indulging in a tautology. The only 
objective criterion of superiority, among human races as among all 
other species, is biological: the strong survive, the weak perish. The 
superior race of mankind today is the one that will emerge 
victorious— whether by its technology or its fecundity— from the 
proximate struggle for life on an overcrowded planet.” 

AMERICA ’S DECLINE 

ORDER No. 1007-$8.50 376pp.,pb. 

plus $1.00 for post. & handlg. ORDER FROM: 

LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS, Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA 




Yoice Of Thinking Americans 



LIBERTY BELL 

The magazine for Thinking Americans, is published monthly bv 
Liberty Bell Publications, George P. Dietz, Editor. Editorial Offices: 
P.O. Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA - Phone: 304-9274486. 

Manuscripts conforming to our editorial policy are always welcome, 
however, they cannot be returned unless accompanied by stamped, 
self-addressed envelope. Manuscripts accepted for publication 
become the property of Liberty Bell Publications. 

COPYRIGHT 1983 

. by Liberty Bell Publications 

emission granted to quote in whole or part any article except 

those subject to author’s Copyright. Proper source credit and address 
should be given. 

0 a AAr, T r- ™ ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION RATES : 

SAMPLE COPY with several reprints * 3 nn 

THIRD CLASS - U.S.A. only .... 

™ST CLASS - U.S.A.-Canada-Mexic'o only * ! 332 00 
FIRST CLASS - All foreign countries $35 00 

AIR MAIL - Europe-South America $45 00 

Middle East-Far East-So. Africa .' .’ .' $49 ‘ 00 

Sample Copy 3 4 * 00 

BULK COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION- 
10 copies , 

100 copies $110.00 

d °° c T es ' $400.00 

1000 copies $700.00 

These prices apply only to our standard 52-page editions. 

FREEDOM OF SPEECH-FREEDOM OF THOUGHT 
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION 

The editor-publisher of Liberty Bell does not necessarily agree with 
each and every article in this magazine, nor does he subscribe to aU 
conclusions arrived at by various writers; however, he does endeavor 

medkof thJ e counS! re ° f SUppresSed ^ the controlled news 

It is therefore in the best tradition of America and of free men 
e Tf- ry ^ here ^t Liberty Bell strives to give free reign to ideas for 
u imately it is ideas which rule the world and determine both the 
content and structure of culture. 

We believe that we can and will change our society for the better. 

We declare our long-held view that no institution or government 
created by men, for men, is inviolable, incorruptible, and not subject 
to evolution, change or replacement by the will of the people 

1 o this we dedicate our lives and our work. No effort will be spared 

. ™°. , ® a ^ be , flowed to go unexpressed if we think it will benefit 
the Thinking People, not only of America, but the entire world 

George P. Dietz, Editor & Publisher 



THE RISING SUN 

By Jim Taylor 
(Foreign Correspondent) 

TOKYO, JAPAN —I arranged to stop off in Japan for a few days on my 
way back from Hong Kong to assess the present extremely volatile rela- 
tions between this highly industrialized nation and the United States. 
And, I may add, the current situation is even worse than I had imagined. 
It is not a matter of small differences this time. It is now an immense 
problem, involving the basic Japanese way of life and our American fu- 
ture. At the outset, I can state that it doesn’t look bright for U.S. inter- 
ests. 

The core problem is not anti-Americanism. The Japanese are not at 
odds with either the American people or even the very unreliable Ame- 
rican government. AIDS, “anti-Semitism,” semi-conductors, and the ris- 
ing value of the yen are the chief divisive elements in Japanese minds. It 
follows, of course, that these factors will alter dramatically what the Ja- 
panese think of America. 

My first knowledge of Japanese life came right after World War II 
when I spent a year here with the U.S. Naval Occupation forces. At that 
time, the country was totally united, even in total defeat. It was during 
1946 that their beloved emperor was no longer a living god. Japan, I am 
sure, was the only country in the world where complete and absolute 
authority reigned supreme in all phases of life. This was proven when 
the surrender document was signed. Although the Japanese troops were 
fierce fighters on every front, the minute they were ordered to cease 
hostilities, not another shot was fired. The Japanese population was 
transformed in one small minute from a resolute enemy into a docile na- 
tion, ready to obey any orders by the occupying powers. They were no 
dissenters. There were no guerrilla fighters taking to the hills. All was 
quiet and orderly. 

To the great masses of the Japanese people, General Douglas Mac- 
Arthur, the supreme commander, became a kind of new “god” to re- 
place the emperor. However, this feeling toward MacArthur and the 
American conquerors in general did not last. When I was again in Japan 
during the Korean conflict, I noticed many subtle changes. 

Some Americans, who are resentful of Japan’s great success in the 

Liberty Bell / November 1987 



U S. mar k etp, ace and throughout the world, may believe that Japan also 
wdl be plagued with the many ills of present industrial nations, such as 
Amenc a T Ma ny Americans seem to think that the only way to compete 
with the Japanese is to persuade them to have high-priced and greedy 
a or umons who want a three-day work week with a company executive 

pay , f 6C T ^ Cy , argUe that > “ time > Ja Pan will have major labor 
p ob eras, work ethics trouble, rebelhous drug-taking youth, “women’s 

hb crusades, and a total breakdown of family life, just like the U.S. 
Well, don’t count on it! 

Am ™J ^ mei J an T attitade is the sa me thing as blaming Japan for 
, . . S r °ables. Just because Japan can make better products and 

°! C doesnt mean that we should condemn them and shut off 

e apanese. That’s like a man who is a total failure blaming 
° 6 f S .,°. r IS ack of success. It is not Japan’s fault that Americans can- 
ot build an automobile any longer which will not break down. The 

£ tl 1 ™ T ?r n0t m b i nn ®! ng Japan>S factories down lo our level of inef- 

Tn r \ U1 J rebU ! Idmg the pride of Americans b the work place 
and m the finished product, as it used to be in the U.S. 

The Japanese take great pride b their work. They are together as a 

nation without any illegal aliens, mborities screaming for more welfare 

and less work, or any type of Dissension b the ranks. Trade unions here 

are symbolic and work with the management -not agabst it. Most 

workers enjoy lifetime employment by a sbgle employer. They become 

oyal, efficient, and trusted employees. They do not shop around and 

toil nf '1 1 Way AmCricanS like to do - Aad Japanese union workers 
toil oyer 200 hours a year more than their American counterparts. 

It is not by accident, but by nature, that Japanese high school stu- 
dents record the world’s highest grades on tests of skill and btelligence 
w lie American teen-agers have dropped down to the bottom of the list. 

, “ e threat ° f organizations of “women’s lib-type,” there has 

been little change ,n the attitude of women here. Once women worked 
and then married, never to return to the work place. Now, they work, 
marry, and later return to work after they are 35 or 40. 

A ® f ° r Spo . rts ’ d,e Japanese do not allow such activities to bterfere 
with their work They enjoy tennis, golf, and the American sports of 

populi £md basketba,, ~ not football. Soccer, however, is quite 

If you want to see what amounts to a free show for Americans, and 
a lesson in efficiency at the same tune, I suggest you go to a large 
epartment store in Tokyo at the moment it opens b the mornbg. At 

2 Liberty Bell / November 1987 


■ t 


r. • k* ' t 


'V 


■ •' ■> 


\ the •nppomtedi^ pot One ^ tw6 girls in. , . . 

dqrbyr^ge hntSrPP^ thej doprA'and bpW . • * , 

vi-rv m*ac&Poilv..fa the waiting customers; ^ V V 


• unison.. Itis.almosCjiko entering a miiitar^hase.^., ^;, ■' v ^ 

A ■, ... .. • \Vhat' r ’.surprised ' me'\niostv uk" that- ^heri^Jai5'ahes rf e;.-t^lew%on . ^ 

newscasters" conie. out, the> still.JioWvpolitgly to; their vast bu*t unseen' 

^utUqnce; > • " ■ 

ThcTapahese were, the Very first. tb.makd^e^feiisiye use ofi dblM^e * 
young children in- televison'ComtnercialSr They arb'- so -fetching that-no - . .. . 

one would want to. turn away from' the TV set at ad..timdihere. ] sat ,, 
entranced-inmy ro'bm watching thentdbspite the' fact that ! wasntiiiter- 
cstedtb tWpgrams. In. thfeU.Si-, ohildtcft ar'e now used also for com- • ■ 
mercials such' as Burger King, etc! ydikve seen them: But these little v . 

Japanese'ypuugsters could ;Charm. the most cynical, t^eyisto^vViewers. ■. • , « 

Sbce I cover mostly wars;' politics,' and foreign affairs; h-Was .a real. — 

pleasure 'ahd.a change of pace to dismiss World affabs and just, watch . 

the children on TV here. They sell with a light touch, soft anddelightfiil. 
as the tiny whiskers on a kitten or the morning dew on a petal of a rose; 

You may be mildly surprised at a few comments made to me here m 
Tokyo as ! conducted my own little survey of Japanese buyers, mostly 

housewives;-' ' ' ' .. , , 

Here is what one 50-yeafrold mother, obviously a comparison shop- 
per, told me. “We used to buy American things 20 years ago. We liked 
them fine then,” she confided to me. “But not now. When I see Ame- 
rican labels now I put it right back down. I used to like American shirts 
for my husband. Now American shirts not good at all. When first wash- 
ed, the buttons fall of and collar sags. Very poor quality now. We got 
smarter. No more do we buy American. I buy West-German shirts 

now.” . j 

A male shopper told me essentially the same thbg. Japan used to 

emulate America. Now we do not. It led us down the wrong path,” he 

said. . , 

The ancient tea ceremony of Japan, which Americans never under- 
stood and dislike, but sometimes put up with in order to get Japanese 
contracts, is relaxing, gracious, and restores one’s dissipated nervous 
energy. A great deal of Japanese busbess has been lost to European 

companies due to American impatience. 

Japan is a special place because it possesses the powers to in- 
fluence a continent and perhaps the world. Yet is is merely a small 

Liberty Bell / November 1987 3 




/ string of offshore islands with few natural resources. 

linedffcT « the Scrape, ed, and expresswa,- 

ma] rock giden. mSP °” "» ■!>'« beauty ot a small but for- 

WofLTr 7 j‘ S ““ B8h ““e 5 P“ d . 1« the people occupy 
hours of time each day over a small conversational courtesy. 

in their own(T Wl | ) v der Japanese “professionals” are called that 

t“a^ c r» , a H ,0 ” S ; T ethW il is a <**"">- « pH a garden, a meal. 

foli^al^ur^O 56 ‘a^P^ahieveor eiddbit^acefiil^erfectUm^ymmetry^r 

or sorting ornffiS^ 6 ”’ ’’'c'" 8 golf ' ,lmni "8 a symphony orchestra. 
Japan ha, T^ J r StrKtS ' (te J arc unsurpassed. 

most modern Ts 1 : 5 '- . most challenging and perhaps the 

i • • > u expensive city in the world. Yet there are still 

aboripne villages less than an hour’s flight away. 

If you’re planning to visit Japan, remember that to sav courtesv 

reSyouXt wh™ 8 ^ Japanese is puttin g it mildly. Also, let me 
remind you that when you think a Japanese seems to be beating around 

the^bush, your interlocutor is not being devious at all, he is ^pfy big 

0 J^ m ° re a ? abs 5 the Japanese customs than for American 

have’ no resn^M^ 8 fa the Kenned y persuasion, who seemed to 
ave no respect for other cultures, told me that tradition is nnihmrr 

“wiLThTlr? t r° d ° thingS 3 certain Way instead of improving on 
it. With that attitude, I can see why he did not have much success Z 

usrness here. He couldn’t sell that idea to the hard-working Japanese 

JapanMevalues wih prevafl 6 e “ her ' In t,,e e " d ’ 1 ttat *">«°nai 

becaS ; z k as \it r 

government tried to institute a program for fesfina *11 a * * The 

thfs However ^ pressured Japanese leaders out of 

are tSdl their “ gK ° ng and S mg a Pore, individual Japanese 
are taking their own precautions to prevent this “American disease” 

seems to be able to distinguish Americans from all other Euronean- 
possible. V1Sd0rS S ° tly t0 aV ° id C ° Dtact with Americans whenever 


Liberty Bell / November 1987 


Believe it or not, some cashiers at places used by Americans use 
clear plastic gloves when handling money, which they then disinfect 
before sending it to the bank. 

It makes one feel like a leper to get on a train and have people 
move away. No one wants to sit next to an American because the 
Japanese have read many stories about three more American nurses 
who contracted AIDS from patients in emergency rooms. There is also 
an article quoting an American doctor saying that it is possible to get 
AIDS by shaking hands with a victim, if one’s hands are chapped. So, 
out of necessity, the Japanese are taking no unnecessary chances with 
American visitors. 1 

When an American leaves a restaurant, out comes the Lysol spray. 

When I visited Japan in 1976, I noticed a certain disillusionment 
developing toward the United States. Now in 1987 it is full blown. 

For the first time since the end of World War II, large numbers of 
Japanese intellectuals, many in influential positions, are turning away 
from the U.S. Most feel that the U.S., through the influence of the 
powerful Zionist banking interests, is turning against their country. They 
say Americans are now resentful of Japan’s astounding success. Think- 
ing Japanese are resentful of America’s economic and moral decline. 
Some respond with anger. Others fear for the future in a world led by 
the U.S., a nation with no respect at all for the one billion Moslems of 
the world, due to Israeli control in Washington. Yes, even here, as in 
Europe, everyone is fully aware of the fact that the Zionists control 
Congress and the White House -even if many Americans don’t seem to 
have founds this out. 

“I would say that most Japanese are deeply worried about the 
seemingly endless demands of the United States,” said Mr. Yoshio 
Okawara, a former ambassador to Washington, and now an adviser to 
Keidanren, the Japanese Federation of Economic Organizations. “They 
wonder when these ceaseless demands, which were never necessary, will 
finally end.” 

A number of Japanese intellectuals see strong reminders of at- 
titudes that emerged in the 1930’s, when militarists grew alarmed by 
what they considered anti- Japanese moves by the U.S. at the urging of 

1. It has been estimated that by 1992 there will be nearly one million people in the U.S. 
with AIDS. Already, the news media honor these victims as kings of the universe. This is 
to soften up you taxpayers, because the cost of caring for them will eliminate most of the 
defense budget, lower your living standard, and bankrupt the U.S. 


Liberty Bell / November 1987 


5 


the Soviet Union, and caused the Japanese military build-up that 

ohmaxed with the attack on Pearl Harbor. More about this later when I 

will delve into the actual causes of World War II, which have been kept 
irom the American, people. 

Japanese officials are now more subdued and far more polite than 

111 ^ s ‘ hostility toward the U.S. and the Zionists who 

run Washington is gradually increasing. The austere Japanese avoid 
cading it directly by a name such as trade war. But there are clear signs 
that the fundamental relationship between the U.S. and Japan has 
reached a major turning point. 

t r c “? j ° in f d the Ja P anese Nay y “ World War II and fought against the 
U.S said Akira Ogata, a commentator for NHK, the prestigious 
public television network here. "Since then, I and most of my generation 
ave come to accept the U.S. as an absolute necessity. We’ve accepted 
trade unfairness like changes in the weather, something natural and un- 
avoidable, and tried to adapt in a passive and uncomplaining way, as 
one does with storms or weather changes. 

Most Japanese have not been willing to fight against severe and 
restrictive U.S. trade policies which are hurting us, until this point. Now 
we re surprised by the rise of the barriers. It’s a shock,” he continued 
At the same time voices are being raised against Japan in the U.S., at- 
tacking us unfairly as an economic threat to America. Most people have 

not yet begun to fully resent U.S. pressure, but I worry that they are 
coming rapidly to such a view.” 

^ n °lher view of the both intellectuals and businessmen here is that 
the long postwar interplay between the U.S. as benevolent conqueror 
and Japan as the resurgent victim has fully run its course, leaving a 
Japan that is now a kind of created Frankenstein monster. 

The U.S. never anticipated the emergence of Japan as an 
economic giant, and it is difficult for Americans to accommodate them- 
selves to this,” said Wataru Hiraizumi, a 22-year veteran of the national 
Diet (parliament). "Likewise, it’s difficult for Japan to see the United 
States as just another ordinary country, and not a god-like giant.” 

Xenophobia, a fear or perhaps hatred of strangers or foreigners, is 
never ar below the surface in this homogeneous island nation. Mr. 
Hiraizumi predicted that neither the U.S. nor Japan will alter its ways 
appreciably but will continue to live together in a kind of uneasy adjust- 

“Japan is not going to change/' Mr. Hiraizumi stated, “We love to 
work hard, and Americans don't. Japan will not slow down. We're too 

6 Liberty Bell / November 1987 

l 


poor. You have to be poor to work hard. The U.S. has everything. We 
have nothing. There is a constant reminder, a hidden complex, that you 
have to work or starve. Our country is too small for 120 million people, 
and we can not produce enough food. The result is that we'll continue 
to work hard and amass huge surpluses of money. We'll buy up your 
land, and you'll live there and pay rent to us. We won't go to war. We 
won't destroy each other. So, we are condemned to live together. But 
remember this. We didn't want it. You opened the gate." 

But what makes Japanese different now is that they view AIDS as a 
foreign disease, one that has been brought to Japanese shores by out- 
siders, meaning Americans, either by homosexual activities or by tainted 
blood products American companies sold to Japanese hemophiliacs. 

A recent poll showed that over 84 percent of the Japanese thought 
that Americans even suspected of having AIDS should not be allowed 
to enter Japan. A survey showed that over half the people said they felt 
very uncomfortable about using toilets in hotels used by Americans and 
most felt unsafe about using swimming pools, if Americans used them. 
One school group said that all Japanese students and teachers returning 
from the U.S. should undergo blood tests before being allowed reentry 

to Japan. 

Americans, on the other hand, think the Japanese are taking over 
the U.S. Recently, when the U.S. government announced a huge bond 
sale, the Treasury Department was depending on the Japanese to buy a 
large portion of it. It's like selling part of our homeland to a foreign na- 
tion, but our national debt is so high we have to do it. One reason prices 
are so high on the New Stock Exchange is because the Japanese are 
buying American companies. Most Americans are unaware of this new 
influence because they never see any Japanese businessmen, It is done 
by brokers and middlemen. 

Americans still think of Japanese as craftsmen, good at fixing things 
and making electronic devices -not as wealthy power brokers in inter- 
national finance. There is no reason for us to be angry with the 
Japanese, They are only doing what we did in countless foreign 
countries for a hundred years. We were successful because we were 
doing things better than the countries we moved in on. 

That's essentially what the Japanese are doing now. They operate 
quietly and diligently. They make all the concessions, but they also end 
up with all the profits, just as we used to do. They even pay us -the fine 
tribute of learning our language. We don't learn theirs. 

Another new expression of Japanese Angst is the surprising emer- 

Liberty Bell / November 1987 ? 


gence of very strong “anti-Semitism.” But I guess this should not really 
surprise anyone, because anyone anywhere in the world would have to 
be totally stupid not to realize that America is under the domination of 
the Zionists. And since the Japanese are anything but dumb, it should 
not e surprising they have figured things out, Even in a country where 
there are few Jews, anti-Jewish literature has rocketed to the top of the 
best-seller fists. And every Japanese keeps up with the Ernst Ziindel 
case in Canada. They know all about the appeal, the new trial, etc. 

i ri A r?, rd ! ng t0 Mr ' Yasushi Yamaguchi, a political scientist on the 
statt ot Osaka University, eighly-two anti-Jewish books have appeared 

this year. Also, the Jewish Defense League has asked the U.S. to put a 
halt to the anti-Jewish feelings now sweeping across this country. It is so 
bad that a publisher told me that the word “Jew” in a book title 
automatically guarantees high sales. One such book, When You Under- 
stand the Tews You Begin to Understand the World, reportedly has now 
sold over a million copies. Written by Masami Uno, it is particularly 
popular among officials of the Bank of Japan, the nation’s central bank 
It is also required reading in classes on foreign affairs at the university 
level. Over here they want to know who controls America and the bank- 
ing world, even if most Americans do not. 

w reaS ° n f ° r the interest is the claim b y ex P erts here that 

ashington has allowed and even urged the world Zionists to force the 

yen up against the dollar, thereby making Japanese exports more costly 

in international markets and potentially causing a recession in Japan. 

As many Japanese see it, the latest of these attacks was President 
Reagan s imposition of tariffs on some Japanese electronic products in 
retaliation for Japan’s alleged failure to abide by a bilateral trade agree- 
ment on semi-conductors. Few Japanese believe that the sanctions were 
imposed because of Japanese pricing of semi-conductors. Rather they 
believe the tariffs demonstrate that the U.S. has panicked and intends to 
punish Japan for its achievements to please the world bankers. 

Americans have never had an economic or business competitor of 
this magnitude,” said Mr. Hiraizumi. “This is why you Americans are 
having a hard time with us. You’re unnaturally scared.” 

In speaking with two well-known Japanese philosophers, Dr. 
Kayano Isharo and Professor Araki Itagaki, and with retired General 
Uchida Honjo, I learned several interesting things about the very begin- 
nings and reasons for World War II. First, the long-held theory in the 
Western world that China and Japan were always bitter enemies is 
simply not true. Most of the ranking Chinese military officers prior to 

& Liberty Bell / November 1987 


World War II attended military schools in Japan, Chiang Kai-shek not 
only went to Japanese schools but actually served in the Japanese Army. 
Several times in the biography of the great Chinese leader, he mentions 
his Japanese brothers kindly and with great respect; stating that these 
two kindred nations would always stand together against both Com- 
munism and the onslaught of Western imperialism. Despite differences 
over who should control Manchuria, there were always many points of 
perfect agreement between China and Japan. 

It is true that Japan needed living space and from 1895 onward took 
by force of arms some Chinese territory. The idea of a Co-prosperity 
Sphere came at a time when China had no real government and after 
1917, when the Japanese feared that Soviet China would engulf all of 
China. 

Dr. Isharo showed me translated documents retelling the start of 
the Pacific part of World War II in a very different light from what you 
have read in American and British history books. Both Japanese intel- 
lectuals and high military officers in the 1930’s agreed on one major 
premise, from which they never wavered. They determined Communism 
to be evil and that it had to be halted before it spread over Asia. This 
alone was the reason Japan sided with Germany and the Axis powers. 

Without exception, their documents and logs reveal that the chief 
reason for the attack on Pearl Harbor came out of the country’s violent 
hatred of Communism, rather than any major policy differences be- 
tween Japan and the U.S. 

Under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Japanese knew better 
than most Americans at the time that hundreds of Jewish Communists, 
such as Alger Hiss, were the chief policy makers in Washington. They 
also knew of Mr. Roosevelt’s very great fondness for things Communist 
and of his admiration for Josef Stalin. When they listened to radio 
broadcasts from the White House (“Fireside Chats”), they listened in 
awe as old F.D.R, praised the Red r6gime of the butcher Stalin. All this 
half-convinced the Japanese that the U.S. was on the verge of coming 
under Communist domination. They also feared that the U.S. might as- 
sist their new Soviet allies to conquer Japan.^ When the American 
leader called Stalin his “best friend” and always referred to him as 
“good ole Uncle Joe” the Japanese took it seriously, even if Americans 

did not. 

2. The Japanese may or may not have known that this opinion was shared by European 
observers, who, after Franklin Roosevelt’s government got under way, saw that the 

Liberty Bell / November 1987 ® 


The Japanese emphasized that they never considered General 
George Catlett Marshal as anything more than a Red puppet who was 
promoting Communist China, I must admit that, until now, I never read 
anything at all in any American publication that fear of all-out Com- 
munism had anything to do with the Japanese reasons for attacking 
P earl Harbor. It is a new idea to me. But it makes sense. 

To back up this anti-Communist theory, I was shown a number of 
documents. The chief one is dated September 7, 1931, At a meeting be- 
tween Chinas Ambassador to Japan, Chiang Tso-pin, and Japan’s 
Foreign Minister, Hirota Koki, the Japanese offered a proposal for a 
joint effort to halt the spread of Commnunism in Asia. 

THE JAPANESE PROPOSAL 

“1, China shall abandon her policy of playing off one major power 
against another and shall cease to use the influence of the European 
countries and the United States as a counterpoise to Japan, If, while 
professing friendship with Japan, China continues to flirt with Europe 
and America, the realization of a Sino- Japanese rapprochement will be 
difficult indeed. 

“2. China shall, in conjunction with Japan; devise ways and means 
for the eradication of Communism, Since the source of this Communist 
menace comes from a country in the north (Russia), it is necessary for 
China to cooperate with Japan in the common defense of her northern 
border regions,” 

At a meeting on September 18, the Chinese offered a counter 
proposal, 

THE CHINESE PROPOSAL 

“1. China has never entertained the idea of playing off one country 
against another, China has never allowed her relations with other 
countries to have any adverse effect on Sino-Japanese relations, least of 
all to discriminate against Japan or to do damage to Japan. 

United States was being converted into an auxiliary of the Soviet Union, The Czech 
economist, Anton Zischa, in his book, Japan in der Welt, published in Germany in 1936 
by the Jewish publisher, Goldmann, was convinced that the Soviet Union and the United 
States were then allied for the purpose of encircling and destroying Japan, and he 
thought it likely that the two allies might jointly attack Japan soon after he wrote, early in 
1936. Americans who have been brought up on the usual lies should particularly note that 
it was possible for a Jewish publisher to bring out and sell in Germany a book sharply 
critical of Hitler’s policies four years after Hitler came to power. 


10 


Liberty Bell / November 1987 


“2. While unable to have governmental dealings with Manchuria, 
China’s attitude toward the present state of affairs in that area is one of 
peace in order to avoid confrontation. And China will endeavor to 
enable the people inside and outside the Great Wall to maintain normal 
economic relations. 

“3. As to how Communism on China’s northern borders is to be 
suppressed, China is prepared to discuss with Japan more effective 
means thereof, provided Japan will carry out into effect the three basic 
principles proposed by China for the improvement of Sino-Japanese 
relations and China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity are 
respected.” 

Manchuria, called Manchukuo by the Japanese, 3 was an unsettled 
point at this time; but the halting of the spread of Communism was of 
more pressing importance. 

In Manchuria, something called the a Youth Alliance of North 
China” was organized by the Japanese rotting It was basically an anti- 

3. ‘Manchuria’ is a regularly formed Latin name, coined late in the Seventeenth Century 
by European geographers to designate the homeland of the people who were then ruling 
China. The Manchus are a Mongolian people, ethnically distinct from the Chinese and 
with distinctive faces. They were originally called the Niuchi, but were given the name 
‘Manchu’ (“the pure race”) in the Thirteenth Century by their first great chieftain, Aisin 
Gioro, who was bom of a virgin, as is customary for persons of divine descent. He was 
said to have been the ancestor of Nurhachu, who first unified the Manchu tribes and 
began in 1617 incursions into Chinese territory, which reached a climax in 1644, when the 
Manchus, invited into China by one faction in a three-sided civil war, occupied the 
country and put one of Nurhachu’s sons on the throne as Emperor of China and founder 
of the Manchu (Ch’ing) dynasty that ruled China until 1912, when it was overthrown by a 
revolution led by Sun Yat-sen, a Marxist said to be of mixed Chinese and Jewish ancestry, 
with the support of cliques of Chinese Jews whom the revolution and the continual civil 
wars that followed it made extremely wealthy. Manchuria, called Manchukuo by the 
Chinese, had been joined to China by the Manchu dynasty and was early occupied by the. 
Chinese Communists with lavish support from the Soviet Union, just across the border. 
The Japanese, for their own advantage, of course, made Manchuria independent of 
China in 1931 and placed on its throne the last living descendant of the Manchu dynasty. 
Western busybodies, who so constantly talked about the “self-determination of people, 
should have been pleased that the Manchus regained their independence, even if that was 
achieved with Japanese help. 

4. Ronin in Japanese history were members of a military class or caste (samurai) in feudal 
Japan who, for one reason or another, were deprived of the chief or lord to whom they 
had given an unalterable loyalty. In other words, they were masterless samurai. Among 
the venerated heroes of Japanese history are the Forty-Seven Ronin, who avenged the 
treachery that had destroyed the lord to whom they had given their allegiance; the story is 
told with substantial accuracy in John Masefield’s play, “The Faith- 


Liberty Bell / November 1987 


11 


Communist group. However, it is easy to see how the Chinese would 
think it was also anti-Chinese due to the seemingly permanent Japanese 
influence in the area. ' , 7 

* * * 

Japanese historical experts, the most knowledgeable people in the 
world about foreign affairs of this era, also made it quite clear to me 
that the real reason for forcing King Edward VIII to abdicate the 
British throne was not his impending morganatic marriage to Mrs. Wal- 
lis Simpson; but was strictly because of the King’s inbred pro-German 
sympathies. I was shown a reference book entitled King George VI, by 
the well-known British biographer, Mr. Denis Judd, head of the history 
department at the Polytechnic Institute of North London. This book 
was published in 1982 and is probably available in most U.S. public 
libraries, if any scholars wish to follow up the statements I am quoting. 

On page 137, it reads: “King Edward VIII was notoriously sym- 
pathetic toward the fascist dictatorships of Germany and Italy. That the 
King should have taken these views is not impossible to understand. 
Horrified at the examples of poverty which he had seen at first hand in 
his own country and believing that something could be done about it, he 
admired the centralized governments of Germany and Italy as great role 
models. Disliking and fearing Bolshevism and the growing Jewish in- 
fluence in London, like so many other members of Britain’s ruling class, 
Edward VIII was prepared to flirt with fascism.” 

There is ample evidence to support this view of the king. Shortly 
after King Edward acceded to the throne, von Hoesch, the German am- 
bassador in London, sent a dispatch to Berlin dated January 21, 1936 in 
which he said, “You are aware from my reports that King Edward, quite 
generally, feels warm sympathy for Germany. I have become convinced 
during frequent, often quite lengthy, talks with him that his sympathies 
are deep-rooted and strong enough to withstand the contrary influence 
to which they are not seldom exposed.” 

Here is another direct quotation from the same book: “King Ed- 
ward had no desire to oppose German and Italian expansion. On the 
contrary, when German troops reoccupied the Rhineland in March of 

ful.” In modem times, such as in the 1930’s, the word is used to refer to soldiers of for- 
tune. 

Continued on page 55 

12 Liberty Bell / November 1987 


NOTES ON SOCIOBIOLOGY 

by 

Allan Callahan 

The word “sociobiology” came to public attention in 1975 with the 
publications of Sociobiology: The New Synthesis , by Harvard zoologist 
Edward O. Wilson. In the old “nature vs. Nurture” controversy it 
provided new ammunition for those who hold that the former has more 
to do with human behavior and personality than the latter. And even 
though he carefully explained and repeatedly said that he doesn t hold 
that certain kinds of people are genetically superior to others, Wilson 
was doused with a bucket of water at a scientific meeting in 1978 by 

protesters who labeled him a “Nazi” and '“racist.” 

Although the nature advocates are-making some gains, they are still 
timid and still very much on the defensive. And their caution is very un 
derstandable because there are myriads of egalitarians around, watch- 
ing them like hawks, and just itching to try and slap them down at any 

moment. 

One excuse that these watchdogs give for behaving as they do is 
that they want to prevent the horrors of another attempt to bring into 
being a superior race. They are referring, of course, to Germany and 
WWH. Now, there were many more causes of of WW II than the “supe- 
rior race” thing, but let’s single out this one factor and examine it. 

We have to be aware of opposites here. If the Germans under Na- 
tional Socialism wanted to create a superior race, then do those op- 
posed to create an inferior race? They say that Gerpiany was willing to 
fight to preserve the Aryan genepool? Well then, do dissenters 'want to 
destroy that genepool? it is time the improvement-haters faced up to 
reality. It is time they took responsibility for their. part in WW II, and any 
destruction caused by those precepts. This they do not want to do. They 
want to shove the blame for the whole war off onto Germany, and lay 

everything onto her. 

A perfect example was given by President Truman, When speaking 
of the destruction in German cities during the war, Truman said that 
“they did it themselves.” Alrightthen, who damaged the English cities? 
Why, the Germans of course did this, we are told. They are responsible 
for the destruction in both English cities and German cities. The Allies, 


•* • < 


Liberty Bell / November 1987 


13 



/*// &jaJ & 
r /d> 4 

then, by this reasoning, sat out the whole war on the sidelines, taking no 
part in it, seeing as how the bad old Germans did all the damage them- 
selves, Good thinking!! 

Suppose some White sociobiologists really do want to preserve 
their own race — is this a crime? If a black man said he wanted to 
preserver his race, would there be an outcry? Is it more important to 
improve horses and cattle than to improve people? Naturally no one is 
suggesting that we herd humans into pens and breed them like livestock. 

Any improvements will come differently, more slowly, and will have to 
fit in with our morals. Some critics argue that to accept sociobiology 
would mean that we are saying the ideal children of the future should all 
be White. They miss the point. What we are saying is that, as far as race 
is concerned, the ideal children in a While society should all be White, 
and the ideal children in a black society should all be black. We don't 
want them all scrambled up. Ditto for the other races. No good can 
come from breeding a bunch of mulattoes, mestizos, zambos, ter- 
ceroones, quadroones, cholos, musties, fusties, and dusties. 

Noble Prize-winning physicist William Shockley has been a favorite 
whipping boy of recent years because he committed a “thought crime/ 5 
Specifically, he does not believe that blacks are genetically equal to 
Whites in intelligence. Truly this is the most horrible of all crimes. He 
also feels that overall intelligence is declining in the U.S. because of 
over-breeding among the “genetically disadvantaged, 55 a large section of 
the population which includes most blacks. And to fight against this dys- 
genic trend he advocated giving money to low IQ people who would 
agree to be sterilized. If they were of childbearing age and had incomes 
top low to be taxed, he proposed paying them $1,000 for each IQ point 
they registered below 100. 

Naturally, muddle-headed America, drunk on “equality, 55 doesn't 
want to hear a courageous man like Shockley give his honest opinion, 
and isn't likely to buy any sensible suggestion like this, but Singapore 
has put into effect a race-improvement program. In this progressive 
Asian country, people without a university education are rewarded if 
they will agree to sterilization after having only one or two children, and 
those with college degrees are given incentives to have large families, 
the Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew, defends the policy by saying that 
with-out it Singapore's “levels of competence" would drop due to gra- 
dual genetic deterioration. 

$ 

Continued on page 55 

14 Liberty Bell I November 1987 





NOTES ON SOCIOBIOLOGY, continued from page 14 

One common argument against sociobiology is that it teaches that 
intelligence is inborn and unchangeable, causing a lot of agony to those 
who were shortchanged at birth. But it is the hereditary limits that are 
unchangeable, not the IQ scores. These scores can usually be raised, to 


a certain extent, by diligent study. But an individual's hereditary limits 
are like a framework; he can move up or around inside the one he was 
born with, but cannot get out of it. 

Accepting this truth should not cause mental anguish in anyone, un- 
less he has been programed into thinking that he should feel anguish. 
The mind is no different than the body. We all know that we can im- 
prove our bodies to a certain extent, but can't get beyond our limits. The 

mind can be improved within limits, too. 

A huge, powerfully built man is naturally not built for speed. Should 
he feel mental anguish about this? If he really wants to run he can im- 
prove his running a good deal by running exercises, but he can never be 
a champion runner. So what? A small, slender man can never he the 
heavyweight boxing champion of the world, either, because he can never 
gain the needed size and strength. He can gain some size, and some 
strength, and greatly increase his boxing ability, but he can never be 
heavyweight champ. Should the knowledge of this cause him mental 

agony? 

Blacks did not inherit the mental ability of Whites, but this should 
cause no hand-wringing. They can't help what they inherited, and can’t 
blame anyone, unless they want to blame Yahweh, the Jewish tribal god, 
who created everything, or so they say. Anyway, they are good in certain 
sports, and can be proud of this. 

Years ago negroes were told they had certain rights, or should have 
them; that they should be able to go into White societies, marry White 
women, do this and do that, and that it was all a legacy that was laid out 
for them. All they had to do was demand it, ever more loudly. These no- 
tions were originally put into their noggins by White race-mixing 
agitators, as blacks would never have dreamed of asking for these things 
themselves. 

Egalitarians fear that the more sociobiology takes hold, the more 
chance there will be that negroes will be considered inferior. But let me 
point out here that blacks are superior to Whites in adapting to black 




cultures, just as Whites are superior to them in adapting to White cul- 
lures. 


What is black culture? Go look at those tribes in Africa that hav 


been influence the least by Whites and you will see how they live Th 
huts are built of sticks and mud. It is dark and gloomy mside as 
are no windows. The smoke from cooking fires is pervasive for there 
are no chimneys. There may be vari-ous kinds of filt on 
Creepy-crawlies fell out of the thatch roof, but the black man do 
mind'particularly, he can put up with it. The White man would find 
more difficult to adapt to these conditions; therefore, the black man is 

superior when it comes to living in a black culture. White 

On the other hand, the negro finds it harder to adapt to the White 

man’s towns and cities, to his technology, to his ways and and his 

ture. The latter is superior here. , p 

One of the best proofs of nature of nurture comes from the study 

twins, especially from the study of identical twins raised separat y 
Some of the key work here has been done at the Minnesota Cente 
Twin and Adoption Research. Hundreds of pairs of twinshaveb 
tested here since 1979, including fo.urty-four sets of identical twms _ 
were adopted into different home. These investigations .leave no d mb 
that brainpower and behavior are determined more by the DNA in t 

cells of humans than by their environments 

If the egalitarians do not succeed in slapping it down, we see that 
sociobiology does offer a bright new hope. No, it does not mean that t 
U.S. will reintroduce slavery. It simply recognizes that man is part of 
nature, that the laws of heredity have not been repealed, and that t 
currently popular slogan of “equality” does not mean biological 

eqU The acceptance of nature over nurture could also mean that there 
™ll eventually be a move toward the geographical separation of the 
races, not because anyone forces them to move m this direction, but be- 
cause it is in accordance with their inborn feelings, which they may no 
be fully aware of. Man is a territorial animal, and unless racial gro p 
have their own territories, they are not living m harmony with natund 
law. And when they do not so live, it creates all sorts of problems, wh 

origins may be unsuspected. 



< 


56 


Liberty Bell / November 1987 ■ f 


THE RISING SUN, continued from page 14 

; I 1 _ 

1936, thus raising the possibility that Britain might intervene, he made it 
clear to the German government that he opposed any British interven- 
tion. When, in that same year, Italy invaded Abyssinia, he worked to un- 
dermine any government attempt to stand up to this invasion. He was 
reported as assuring Mussolini's ambassador of this. 

4 ‘In May of 1936, the King said that the League of Nations, which 
was trying to enforce economic sanctions against Italy and to which the 
British government had pledged support, could be considered dead and 
that for peace in Europe it was absolutely essential that the two great 
nations of Germany and Italy should be afforded full satisfaction by 
granting them, with full realization of their needs, the necessary colonial 
markets." 

So plain had the King's sympathy for Nazi Germany become by 
December of 1936 and so strenuously had he tried, to influence the 
British government that Chips Channon, writing in his diary, said, * He, 
too, is going the dictator way, and is pro-German, against Russia and 
against too much slipshod democracy. I shouldn't be surprised if he 
aimed at making himself a mild dictator, a difficult task enough for an 
English king." Mrs. Simpson was also very pro-Nazi; indeed Lord Louis 
Mountbatten later claimed that she encouraged the King in his tenden- 
cies. 

The dictators may have miscalculated the power which the 
monarch possessed in the British political system. But they were right in 
supposing that they had a strong friend on the throne of England, and 
this was one reason for the German decision to send Baron von Rib- 
bentrop to London as the new ambassador to London in 1936. In his 
memoirs, he explains his feeling that he could be of more use at the 
Court of St. James than as director of foreign policy in Berlin, because 
Hitler's main intention at the time was to neutralize or make an ally of 
Britain, if possible with an Anglo-German alliance. 

Certainly, Prime Minister Baldwin decided to withhold from the 
King certain sensitive documents. Since there was no way of restricting 
the King's tendency to speak spontaneously and freely to foreign ambas- 
sadors, it seemed expedient to restrict his access to confidential 
material. But in fact, the prime minister had no right, according to con- 
stitutional practice, to withhold any government papers from the King. 

So there is more than ample evidence now available to prove that 
the ruling faction in Britain actually wanted to get rid of the King for his 


Liberty Bell / November 1987 • 


57 


pro-Nazi views, rather than because of his dalliance wWh Mrs. S 1 ™?* 0 "’ 
the American divorcee. British kings have a long and Wesome tetory 
such indiscretions and this was never considered reaso" 
rid of any of them. But growing Jewish pressure made it ' • » * 

die King to remain on the throne, and the government needed an exm.se 
to get Mm out of power. And Mrs. Simpson, whose teputaBonlvas cer 
tainly aheady tarnished before she Sven met the King, provided just 
St means l, accomplishing this. An anti-Ziomst, »„t.-Commun st mid 
pro-German king could not be tolerated by the war-monger at that 
Le. Most historians now believe that poor Mrs. Simpson was not the 

real reason for his abdication. „ T i •&. h toeen the 

On page 148 of this biography is found, The rift between 

Windsors and the Royal Family was not helped by jhe ^ 

couple’s visit to Nazi Germany m the summer of 1937 The N 
propaganda machine was quick to make capital out of hevis t. 
Windsors met many leading Nazis, including Goerrng, Himmler, H 
17 My the Fifcer himself. Both the Duke and Duchess waked ^en- 
thusiastic at what they saw in German factories, hospitals amiy™* 
camos Wherever they went they were given unexpectedly warm wel 
comes % the people of Germany. In return, the Duke was reported m 
the p^ as having given the full Hitler salute on at least two ^occasion. 
The Duchess told reporters that ‘Hitler was the most charming man she 

^ to were many others throughout the British Empire who were 
just as pro-German as the King. For instance, in 1939, South Africa was 
essentially pro-German, especially the Afrikaners; the Nationahst P^ty 
led by Malan and Strijdom, was unashamedly pro-Nazi. Britam had t 
force South Africa to intern these pro-German leaders, including thre 
who later became prime ministers of the republic, 

before she lapsed into the senile coma that P te “ d f b^soU^ him 

have been written by a fatuously infatuated man j etter are now 

»•> “» s IS. i" « ia»g Ed. 

being used to conceal the pressures that the Jews a 6 p the 

ward to facilitate driving Great Britain Into a suiada 1 war aga.: nsi Gernj 

letters are not comparable to the famous “D.anes of Adolf Hitler, they y P 


58 


Liberty Bell / November 1987 


When he was the American ambassador to England, Mr. Joseph 
Kennedy, the father of President John F. Kennedy, was also very pro- 
German and outspokenly condemned Britain for taking up arms on the 
side of the Communists. His exact words were, “I back the Chamberlain 
policy of an accord and peace with Germany. I find it quite incredible 
that Britain should pursue a war apparently being fought to protect the 
territorial integrity of the Communists in Eastern Europe.” Old Joe was 
outspoken, and, of course, that’s why he was fired. 

The Japanese scholars pointed out to me that Bulgaria, despite a 
plea from King George VI not to aid Germany, decided to do so anyway 
to prevent the Communists from ravaging the country. King Boris told 
his London cousin, “Against honesty, they (Communists) set dishonor; 
against our faithfulness, they set treachery; and against justice, they set 
terrorism. How can England and you justify aiding such people?” 

Dr, Isharo asked me, “Did you know that King George VI, unlike 
his brother Edward, sent a specially-made British sword with a two- 
edged blade, made of the hardest steel, to Marshal Josef Stalin? 
Winston Churchill delivered it in November of 1942 at the Tehran Con- 
ference. Stalin was overcome. King George paid great homage to Com- 
munism as did President Roosevelt, It appeared to us (Japanese) that 
both Western powers were using Marxism against us in 1940 and 1941.” 

This marks the first time anyone in authority has ever mentioned 
these reasons for Japan’s part in World War II. Of course, I knew that 
during November of 1941 F.D.R. sent daily antagonistic and contradic- 
tory messages to Japan in an obvious attempt to provoke that govern- 
ment into action. Mr, Roosevelt wanted to join the war on the side of 
Britain, but Congress and the American people would not go along with 
him. An overwhelming majority of Americans were opposed to his plan. 
So he had to find other means of getting us involved. His work paid off 
on December 7, 1941, as we all know now. 

Looking at it strictly from a Japanese point of view, the resulting at- 
tack on Pearl Harbor is not so difficult to understand. Even King 
George VI, who wanted desperately for America to declare war on 
Germany, viewed the Pacific war clouds in a more understanding man- 
ner than the White House. Here is the official statement made after 
World War II had ended. 

nothing, for everyone knows that otherwise rational men often become inexplicably and 
ridiculously infatuated with artful women. — Editor.] 

Liberty Bell / November 1987 59 


fi 


/ 

/ 


y said “The attack upon Pearl Harbor was not. without just cause. 

He said, the ta k up Japanese expansion 

The U.S. was gravely upset by the rate ana exten y Indeed, 

at the expense of the Chinese Communists in , n f 1940 

shortly after signing the Atlantic Charter ™* ^^ShtX correctly 
F . D . Rj issued a serious -J- s .„p their ,g- 

S3, hfhavior against the Chirrese ~sri, who wearied - 

with Russia, Britain’s new to send the Russians to 

stronger messages to the Japanese, threatening 

attack Japanese forces in China.” Mhi the Russia ns were 

Long before the Japanese entered Mancnur , 
there in force, claiming title to the Chinese Eas ^ h 

Chinese forces along the ’ e ' d of the Chinese railway. 

Th^Russtan'occupatton was characterised by great pillage, arson and 
"~eShi„g the Russians did was burn do™ 

ConsSate at Changsha. It became quite obrious tat T. "? 

not fear the weak Chinese fortes, but were deafly afaudrf the nuhtar, 

minded Japanese, who had defeated Russra in the 1905 w. 

By 1931, the Russians had created a Chinese ' Communist army t 

carry out their demands. The following capb * bs Y ou 
.. tober 24, 1931 was addressed to Commumst cadres m four vrhagea 1 
can see how harsh were these unreasonable demands on an already rnr 

POV to"rte been instructed by the 
complish the Mowing tasks within one week. As of Oflober 5 » each 
village is required to send five persons to the enlarged y, 

to the Youth Vanguard; four to the fighting company; two to the car 
corps; ^o toTe work’ers' corps; three to die propaganda corps; and 

three to the inspecting corps. . . of 

“Each village must dehver 30 catties of saltpete 

winter uniforms. Delivery must be within 10 days of this not c • 

“All grain produced by the village must be concentrated m Soviet 

storage, and no village is permitted to retain any. , f • 

%’ow about landlords, rural bullies and reactionary etements m 
your village? How many have been ar rested and how many 

Liberty Bell / November 198/ 

60 


caped? Each village/must submit a detailed list of these to the higher 
authorities within 10 days. 

“The Soviet vis in urgent need of tailors, blacksmiths, charcoal 
burners. It also needs wood boards, bamboo, big kettles. You are re- 
quired to supply them within the shortest period of time. 

“Today, We have received another letter from the Soviet asking 
each village to supply 80 bales of cloth and two students from each 
school. Each village is also asked to send 30 men to the transport corps 
of the Red Guard.” 

As you can tell by the above orders, the Communist army was es- 
sentially a guerrilla force exercising a terrorist control of the 
countryside, which was their source of food supplies and manpower. 

Japan’s leaders in the realm of foreign affairs believed that their 
over-crowded nation’s survival required the creation of a powerful 
colonial empire on the Asian continent. Not everyone , in Japan agreed 
with this concept. But all agreed that the Communist menace in China 
had to be dealt with soon. One group of extremists, young army colonels 
called the Sakura Kai (Cherry Society), conceived the idea of gaining 
lining space while at the same time protecting themselves by driving the 
Soviet Communists out of North China. Lt. Colonel Hashimoto Kingoro 
/was their leader. 

It really wasn’t any better from the Nationalist Chinese standpoint 
to have Japan occupying Manchuria than it was to have Russian Com- 
munists encroaching upon their land. So on September 21, 1931, Dr. 
Sao-ke Alfred Sze, China’s representative at Geneva, acting upon in- 
structions from the Nationalist government, formally submitted to the 
League of Nations China’s case against Japan. 

A resolution was passed by the League for Japan to withdraw from 
China. But it seems that since Japan feared the Communists more than 
the powerless League of Nations, they simply ignored all such demands 
and withdrew from the world body instead of leaving China. 

However, by the time that the Russians were driven out of China, it 
was too late for the cancer of Communism to be eradicated. It had al- 
ready infected many Chinese leaders, including Mao Tse-tung. He set 
up seven "Soviet” districts in North China from Hunan to Fukien. 
These districts covered parts of seven provinces with a land area of 
200,000 square miles and a civilian population of nine million. 

The Japanese had to oppose both the Chinese Communists and the 
Nationalists. Chiang Kai-shek had the toughest task of all for he had to 
fight on three fronts, against the Japanese, the Chinese Communists, 

Liberty Bell / November 1987 61 


\ 

l 

\ 


\ . ' 

defending territory from the Japanese and concentrated on elnrn g 
the Chinese Reds, who, he thought, were the great evd.\ 

Chiang’s fifth long campaign to extermmate the Commumsk b ga^ 

in 1933 on October 2 when he told a meeting of sta 

Nanchang: “Our preparation for this campaign has be ^ f 

going and meticulous in every way. There is no question ha we sh^ 

succeed in exterminating the Communists. It is imperative that we com 

nlete our work within the shortest possible time. The original three-year 
p ete our worx wuun in r first phase 

plan must be achieved in record time, we musi mu f /U 

of our plan -destruction of the mam Communist forces and the capt 
of the perilous international situation and of the problems at-home, 
cannot afford to spend three or five more years to finish ^b 

This time old Chiang was smart enough to hire some exceUe 

military help. He brought in a large number of veteran 
to plan and execute the attacks on the Reds. They did th j • 

And these same gallant German officers later serve m P^ J \ 
they fought the Communists a second time. Then, of comse.tog 
World War n, these same experienced German commanderswe \ 
the Communists for a third time. It is not news that the Germans were\ 
on the winning side against the Commies in Chma and Spam; but no^ \ 
World War II, where the Commumst side was supported by g , . 

Fr To„“ee! h old^D.R. proven .nodes to get Africans involved 
in World War II. He often said to his cronies. Before we m e 
war...before we even make weapons...we first must make enemies^ 
that is exactly what he did, with the help of his Jewish tads. -He 
created a propaganda war with many untrue statements about both 

G "S“e d loTdead historical facts lead one to believe that Charles 
A. Lindbergh, Henry Ford, Sr., General George S. Patton, King .Edward 
VIII, and even Winston Churchill, in hindsight, were correct m believing 

that America was on the wrong side in World Warn. 

As to the present on-going trade war with Japan 
dent Reagan, the Japanese are absolutely blameless for Am 

deficiencies in the work place. But Mr. Reagan is usm g e 
tactics of President Roosevelt, the man he admires most to blame 
Japan for current U.S. woes. Before our big spender in the ^ 
House can raise taxe s, he must make an enemy of Japan m the eyesof 
— Liberty Bell / November 1987 


I * 


the gullible American public. Whom the gods wish to destroy, they first 
make angry. ■ ' 

Well, let me tell you about this trade business and whom you should 
really blame. Take baseballs, for instance. They are not made in the 
U.S. anymore. The favorite American pastime isn’t so American now. 
No, the balls aren’t made in Japan either, nor in Taiwan or any other 
baseball-mad place. The baseballs used in the Little Leagues right up to 
the Majors are now made in Haiti, of all places. Yes, that little Car- 
ribean country, which also gave us AIDS, relayed from darkest Africa, 
now produces our baseballs. 

Next time you go to the ball park, look closely at the fine print at 
the edge of your ticket. Chances are you’ll read the words “printed in 
Taiwan.” Look at the scoreboard. It is Japanese, inside and out includ- 
ing the computers that run it. The uniforms are from Hong Kong and 
Taiwan. The bats, most of them, are Canadian-made. The shoes are 
from Italy, Taiwan, or Korea. The socks were made in Taiwan or 
Mexico. In the lining of the baseball caps is a line reading “Made in 
South Korea.” The infield is maintained with a machine made by the 
Honda people. The hot-dog you eat may be the only true American 
item left in the ball park. And I would not even guarantee that. 

* * * 

Although Mr. Reagan is doing his best to spread the shadow of war 
in the Persian Gulf, you had better hope he is not successful, because 
we cannot win such a conflict despite the possible loss of a million 
American lives. 

After the attack on the U.S.S. Stark, all the other frigates in the U.S. 
Navy were quickly tested. None of them worked. Their gun-control 
banks failed. If you have watched “60 Minutes,” you already know that 
our tanks don’t work, our helicopters are death traps, and our military 
amphibious craft sink right to the bottom of even small rivers. 

Recently, in a Nevada test dubbed Mighty Oak, the system failed 
and blew up. We lost 32 million dollars worth of hardware. According 
to the government report, the military equipment was exposed to high 
radiation. Someone forgot to close a steel door. 

Our space shuttles have been blowing up on takeoff and the 

guidance systems on jet fighters are faulty. These items were made in 

America. Is it any wonder that most people will not even buy a car made 
in the U.S.? 

. The Iraqi s attack on the American frigate Stark raises questions 
Liberty Befl / November 1987 ’ 


that go far beyond those of why the attack took place and how it could 
have succeeded. Far more disturbing than the Stark s inexplicable fail- 
ure to defend itself is what the success of the attack says about the pro- 
fessional competence of the U.S, military, whose $300 bi ion annu 

cost represents so much of our gross national product. 

The broad question of whether the United State is capable of em- 
ploying military power is an admittedly unpleasant one. Yet t e recur 
rent failure of American arms since General Douglas Mac t ur s 
spectacular landing at Inchon, Korea in 1950-the U.S. military’s last 
major unqualified success -has undoubtedly raised this question in the 

minds of our allies and potential adversaries alike. , 

It is therefore necessary to recognize that the assault on the Stark 
was but the latest sad page in a dismal chapter in American military his- 
tory. Here is a partial list of the sad failures since the final days of the 

great Patriot, General MacArthur. 

• In late 1950, following the masterpiece of military genius at Inchon, 
U.S forces, under other commanders, advancing northward toward 
the Yalu River were surprised by a massive Chinese attack that re- 
sulted in the longest retreat in American military history. 

• In 1965, after years of piddling around, U.S. combat ground forces 
began a seven-year intervention in Vietnam’s civil war and failed to 
defeat a pajama-clad enemy vastly inferior in numbers, technology, 
arms, and intelligence corps. And remember that the North Viet- 
namese won it without any air force at all; and despite the fact t at 
the U.S. used what military experts at the time said was the best air 

force in the world. 

• In June of 1967, after monitoring the U.S.S. Liberty’s movements for 
a month, General Dayan ordered Israeli armed forces to destroy this 
vessel in international waters and to kill every man aboard. With the 
entire Sixth Fleet a few miles away, the U.S. was unable or unwilling 

to protect the Liberty. 

• In 1968, after the government of North Korea saw how very weak and 
impotent the U.S. had become, as shown by the attack on the Libert y, 
this little fourth-rate country captured another intelligence-gathering 
ship, the U.S.S. Pueblo , and kept the crew in prison for a year. 

• In 1970, a U.S. strike force attempted to rescue American POW’s at 
North Vietnam’s Son Tay Prison camp, only to find that the camp 
was empty because certain American liberals had tipped off the 

Reds about the raid. 


64 


Liberty Bell / November 1987 


• In 1975, U.S. Marines assaulted Koh Tang Island in search of the 
crew of the hijacked merchant ship Mayaguez , only to botch it up and 
take heavy casualties. Then it was learned that the crew had been 
released elsewhere before the attack. 

• In 1980, an operation to rescue American personnel held hostage in 
Iran disintegrated in the desert when Marines on drugs crashed into 
our own planes. The Pentagon report blamed “poor planning, poor 
preparation, and poor execution.” 

• In 1983, a lone Arab freedom fighter took a truck load of explosives 
and blew up the Marine compound in Lebanon, killing 250 Marines, 
who were there only to protect Israel. 

• Two days after the Beirut disaster, a U.S. invasion of tiny Grenada 
went over like a Laurel and Hardy comedy. With no opposition at all, 
the U.S. managed to attack an insane asylum and a hospital by mis- 
take. If the Cubans at the airport had not held their fire until fired 
upon, the landing would have failed. 

I have not mentioned the Kennedy Brothers’ invasion of Cuba be- 
cause it was not wholly American. But it was also a real embarrassment, 
especially when the president went out of his mind with fear and 
withdrew the promised air support. J.F.K. simply lost his will at the last 
minute and abandoned the anti-Communists we had landed at the Bay 
of Pigs to a painful fate at the hands of Mr. Castro. And that is not the 
only black mark against Mr. Kennedy. When the Soviets began illegally 
and against all existing agreements to construct the Berlin Wall in viola- 
tion of World War II treaties, President Kennedy cowardly did nothing, 
saying that a reasonable response would have started World War III. 

As General MacArthur used to say, a military commander ruled by 
fear always loses. This was proven again when President Lyndon B. 
Johnson shivered with fear and did nothing about either the Liberty or 
the Pueblo. He also put limits on battlefield commanders in Vietnam, 
fearing that tough combat sorties against North Vietnam would draw 
t e Red Chinese into the conflict. Ordering American soldiers not to 
fire unless fired upon in Vietnam was letting the enemy have first 

chance to kill Americans. It was a crime, evidently caused by abject and 
uncontrollable fear. 

And I am not forgetting Mr. Reagan’s orders to the Marines in 

Beirut to stand guard with unloaded weapons, thus causing them to be 
slaughtered. 

Not only in the military do we now teach cow ardice. We teach bank 
Liberty Bell / November 1987 g 5 


I 


.5 


t •- . : • « • 




-•t*' '2 k > ik Kvtm ~ % 


. A .-., .--7 


. . • K :„wp„-,l AgSbW. -'t; 7; ,bi, hL aid«r* th.-, i a;,i.'r 

:::,’ . •■K=:-J'^ cv.p;.wM ‘ ^ j $*«&&**.'**&> »*-. 

; * Hin^tPr At^hric^ns-and others aDOdiu, * u ^ m , 


■:f *?&£3££v ' 

• . \ - tx.w'as so.^e oaLibya.and Lebaribn were just -.. 

. as coldly as . any of the^lher^ disasters y anything tq 

X d v°^StSS' : ' 

■ =SS£SH»HS 

ST?Uk *> Philippines, and 
American military installations is in grave doubt, I P _ 
popular opposition is almost certain to block renewai of ^y b^e 

S£— £ Bven in .he ^ £L°Sd“ 

Congress cut military aid. Our friends are non-existent t y 

who can blame them? , . nn( .u of least 

Onr national psyche seems lo be condtuoned to the pad. ot least 

. * , •/ tn pnrliire racial violence and humihation. It is as n 

resistance, to submit, to end , • 0 f f ea r and doubt. Given 

Ampnratis are now overcome by a paralyse U1 . * 

aT tone of Americanjhoughttoday, we cannot win a trade w_ 


- - - “ Liberty Bell I November 1987 

66 


J apan or a shooting war anywhere. 

r > ■ 

* * * 

One small news item here caught my attention. It proves what I 
have been writing. The Shimizu Land Corporation, Japan’s largest con- 
struction company, has just been signed up to build the Camelback 
Esplanade in Phoenix, Arizona. When the American owners of this 
huge project were asked why they are using a Japanese firm instead of 
an American one, they said they “didn’t want it to fall down.” Doesn’t 
. that tell you something? This same Japanese firm has already built two 
large developments in Phoenix. 

This article first appeared in the November 1987 issue of Liberty Bell. 
Annual subscription $25.00. Sample copy & booklist $3.00. 

i I 

Reprints of Jim Taylor’s articles are available at the following prices: 

THE NEXT VIETNAM (Sept. 1986 issue): 4/$l, 50 10/$3.00 50/$13.00 

100/$25.00. HAMMERING THE U.S. (Oct. 1986 issue): 5/$100 
50/$9.00 100/$16.00. BUSH AND ZION (Nov. 1986 issue): 3/$1.50 
10/$4.50 500/$20.00 100/$35.00. REAGAN AND ZION (Dec 1986 
issue): 2/$1.50 10/$6.00 50/$25.00 100/$45.00. ANTI-AMERICANS 
(Jan. 1987 issue): 2/$1.50 10/$6.00 50/$25,00 100/$45.00. MORE OF 
REAGAN’S LIES (Feb. 1987 issue): 2/$1.50 10/$6.00 50/$25 00 
100/$45.00. HOW ZION TRIUMPHS (March 1987 issue): Single 
copy $1.00 10/$8.00 50/$35.00 100/$60.00. FRIENDS WE 

BETRAYED (April 198 issue): 2/$1.50 10/$6.00 50/$25 00 

100/$45.00. THE GREAT TERRORIST (May 1987 issue): 2/$150 
10/$6.00 50/$25.00 100/$45.00. ISRAEL’S PRESIDENT (June 1987 
issue): 2/$l,50 10/$6.00 50/$25.00 100/$45.00. YOUR ENEMIES 
(July 1987 issue): 2/$1.50 10/$6.00 50/$25.00 100/$45.00. THE END 
OF A LOST EMPIRE (August 1987 issue): 2/$1.50 10/$6.00 

50/$25.00 100/$45.00. ZION’S HITMEN (September 1987 issue)- 
Single Copy $2.00 10/$15.00 50/$60.00. THE RISING SUN (Novem- 
ber 1987 issue): single copy $1.50 5/$6.00 10/$10.00 50/$45.00. 

For Postage and Handling include $1.00 for orders under $10,00, 
10% for orders over $10.00. Order from: LIBERTY BELL PUBLI- 
CATIONS, Box 21, Reedy WV, 25270 USA. 

Liberty Bell / November 1987 ~~ — qj 


OWN A PIECE OF AMERICA! 

THET1METO BUY LAND .SNOW! 


72 ACRES, mostly P^sture w/some wo^lan^ Fork 

well fenced. Located p mjes west of R ed ^ ljfied buyer with 

Owner will sell on i Land > S^^V$25 f 000. 

$5,000 downpayment. An exceiiem duy , hpr ideal 

125 ACRES, mos ^^^ < ^|'nves^^nL°o^ted in Reedy Dis- 

for hunting/vacation camp, or investmem, 

Wet. An outatanding buy a < and , 
20.6 ACRES wo^land with some n & schoo)bus rou te 

Sic Tphone L R s e mn y by property. An e,ce„en, bu, a. 

$ Tacres, 2,3 o, » ww-jft yjSj: r«- 

schoolbus route, phone & electric lines run oy p v 

cellent buy at $10,500. ■ ot Rppdv 2 

2 STORY BRICK .BUILDING on ' ¥^1^ a ^d'ef- 

BRs, LR, kitchen, bath s ^r Also included, 'older, 2 story, 
l ficiency apt on ground floor. Als nc Both apart . 

multi-room building ne)J door at $25,000 

ments presently rented; out-. An excellent, ouy * 

3 -BEDROOM RANCHER in Reedy. R “"’ | c aI ° 0Un ^ n8 | e d 

Huge livingroom, c °V n j^t^,tinn throuahout. Natural gas 

familyroom. Wall |° ^L^ SJ X wSer. All of this on 3/4 
Stv h e?,J Se & cSS'oS y by. ,0 m»es bon, county 

46 ACRES 'n ^^Ta^ Sel The'e is 

pasture, 8 ac. meadow bottom 1 ' ^ ro0 ms 2 living rooms, 
an older 2 storv ^ome natura | q as- & wood heat. Also 

k „ne h ton SeSbuWinV Annual taxes $165. An out- 

Annua, taxes $141. An excel- 
lent buy at $45,000. D C A I T Y 


68 


Liberty Bell / November 1987 


' KEEP THE LIBERTY BELL RINGING! . 

Please remember: Our fight is Your fight! Donate whatever you 
can spare on a regular— monthly or quarterly— basis. Whether it is 
$2., $5., $20., or $100. or more, rest assured it is needed here and 
will be used in our common struggle. If you are a businessman, 
postage stamps in any denomination, are a legitimate business 
expense -and we need and use* many of these here every month, and 
will be gratefully accepted as donations. 

Your donations will help us spread the Message of Liberty and 
White Survival throughout the land, by making available additional 
copies of our printed material to fellow Whites who do not yet know 
what is in store for them. 


Order our pamphlets, booklets, stickers, and-most importantly - 
our reprints which are ideally suited for mass distribution at 
reasonable cost. Order extra copies of Liberty Bell for distribution 
to your circle of friends, neighbors and relatives, urging them to 
subscribe to our unique publication. Our bulk prices are shown on 
the inside front cover of every issue of Liberty Bell . 

Pass along your copy of Liberty Bell , and copies of reprints you' 
obtained from us, to friends and acquaintances who may be on our 
'wave length,’ and urge them to contact us for more of the same. 

Carry on the -fight to free our White people from the shackles of 
alien domination, even if you can only join our ranks in spirit. You 
can provide for this by bequest. The following are suggested forms 
of bequests which you may include in your Last Will and Testament: 

1 . I bequeath to Mr. George P. Dietz, as Trustee fox Liberty Bell 
Publications, P.O. Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA, the sum of 
*$ for general purposes. 

2. 1 bequeath to Mr. George P. Dietz, as Trustee for Liberty Bell 
Publications, P.O. Box 2.1, Reedy WV 25270 USA, the following 
described property for general purposes. 

DO YOUR PART TODAY - HELP FREE OUR WHITE 
RACE FROM ALIEN DOMINATION! 


II