?Hf EDUCATION Of
A CONSERVATIVE
REVIIO P. OtIVIR
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Dr. Revilo
Pendleton Oliver, Professor of the
Classics at the University of Illinois
for 32 years, is a scholar of inter-
national distinction who has writ-
ten articles in four languages for the
most prestigious academic publi-
cations in the United States and
Europe.
During World War II, Dr. Oliver
was Director of Research in a high-
ly secret agency of the War Depart-
ment, and was cited for outstanding
service to his country.
V •
One of the very few acade-
micians who has been outspoken in
*us opposition to the progressive
defacement of our civilization, Dr. Oliver has long insisted that the
fate of his countrymen hangs on their willingness to subordinate
their doctrinal differences to the tough but idealistic solidarity^
which i^ the prerequisite of a Majority resurgence.
SOME QUOTABLE QUOTES FROM AMERICA 'S DECLINE
On the 18th Amendment (Prohibition): ‘‘Very few Americans were
sufficiently sane to perceive that they had repudiated the American
conception of government and had replaced it with the legal
principle of the ‘dictatorship of the proletariat/ which was the
theoretical justification of the Jews' revolution in Russia."
* «
On Race: “We must further understand that all races naturally
regard themselves as superior to all others. We think Congoids
unintelligent, but they feel only contempt for a race so stupid or
craven that it fawns on them, gives them votes, lavishly subsidizes
them with its own earnings, and even oppresses its own people to
curry their favor. We are a race as are the others. If we attribute to
ourselves a superiority, intellectual, moral, or other, in terms of our
own standards, we are simply indulging in a tautology. The only
objective criterion of superiority, among human races as among all
other species, is biological: the strong survive, the weak perish, The
superior race of mankind today is the one that will emerge
victorious— whether by its technology or its fecundity— from the
proximate struggle for life on an overcrowded planet.”
• AMERICA’S DECLINE
ORDER No. 1007 — $8,50 376pp.,pb.
plus $1.00 for post. & handlg. ’ ORDER FROM:
LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS, Box 21 ; Reedy' WV 25270 USA
\foice Of Thinking Americans
'X
LIBERTY BELL
The magazine fof Thinking Americans , is published monthly by
Liberty Bell Publications, George P. Dietz, Editor. Editorial Offices*
P.O, Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA' - Phone: 304-9274486.
Manuscripts conforming to our editorial policy are always welcome,
however, they cannot be returned unless accompanied by stamped,
self-addressed envelope. Manuscripts accepted for ' publication
become the property of Liberty Bell Publications.
COPYRIGHT 1984.
by Liberty Bell Publications
Permission granted to quote in whole or. part any article except
those subject to author’s Copyright. Proper source credit* and address
should be given.
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION RATES:
SAMPLE COPY with several reprints $ • 3.00
THIRD CLASS — U.S.A. only $25.00
FIRST CLASS — U.SIA.-Canada-Mexico only $32.00
FIRST CLASS — All foreign countries .V, $35 ; 00
AIR MAIL — Europe-South America , . $45.00
Middle East-Far East-So. Africa $49,00
Sample Copy > $4D0
BULK COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION:
10 copies $ .18.00
50 copies . . . $ 65.00
1Q0 copies . , $110.00
500 copies . ; . . . ; .$400.00
1000 copies $700:00*
Th ese prices apply only to our standard 52-page editions,
FREEDOM OF SPEECH-FREEDOM OF THOUGHT
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
The editor-publisher of Liberty Bell does not necessarily agree with
each and every . article in this magazine, nor does he subscribe to all
conclusions arrived at by various writers; however, he does endeavor
to permit the exposure of ideas suppressed by the controlled news
media of this country,
It is, therefore, in the best tradition of America and of free men
everywhere, that Liberty Bell strives to give free reign to ideas, for
ultimately it is ideas which rule the world and determine both the
content and structure of culture.
We believe that we can and will change our society for the better.
We declare our long-held, view that no institution or government
created by men, Tor nien, is inviolable, incorruptible, and not subject
to evolution, cliange dr replacement by the will of the people.
To this we dedicate our lives and our work. No effort will be spared .
and no idea will be allowed to go unexpressed if we think it will benefit
the Thinking People, not only of America, but the entire world.
' George P. Dietz, Editor & Publisher
v.
A-
.by
Revilo P. Oliver
A RELIGION FOR ARYANS
Many believe that, as is quite possible, a large population of
mediocrities requires the spiritual sustinence of a religion that
promises survival after death as a compensation for the inevitable
disappointments and sorrows of human life. If that is so, a
replacement must be found for the demoralizing cult of the
Jew-god that has, for fifteen centuries, blighted our race and
sapped its vital instincts. And if the substitute religion is not to
impair our race’s vitality, it must be in harmony with the Aryan
*
psyche.
An attempt to design and launch such a religion is being
made by a group who call themselves Reincarnation, Incorpo-
rated, with perhaps a gentle pun in the title. Their initial
promotion is a forty-page tabloid paper, oddly but cleverly
entitled What Is, of which seventy thousand copies are said to
have been distributed from the new Delphi (P.O.Box 3009,
Agoura Hills, California). A second printing of the same quantity
is in prospect to recruit more “New Age Activists,” as members
of the cult like to call themselves.
The obvious basis for an Aryan religion is the doctrine of
metempsychosis, which is congenial to our racial psyche and
was a faith held wherever our race established its superiority ,
from India to Scandinavia. It reappears, with only a little
modification, in Schopenhauer’s doctrine of the palingenesis of
the will. 1 It is foreign to ah the Semitic religions, and appears
among Mongolians only under the influence of Buddhism,
which was exported from India to China.
Belief in the transmigration of souls is not inherently
1. Schopenhauer drew inspiration for much of his philosophy from the
fifty Upanisads that he read in the Latin translation by Anquetil Duperron
(Strassburg, 2 vols,, 18014802), of which he said {Parerga, II, 185 J, ^
has been the most elevating reading which (with the exception of the
original text) there can possibly be in the world. It has been the solace o
my life, and will be of my death.”
December 1986 ^
unreasonable. It is untainted by the trumpery ‘revelations 5 and
preposterously childish tales of the Jewish concoction called
Christianity. Since souls are, by definition, invisible and im-
palpable, one cannot prove that they do not exist and do not
ixei as a catalyst, so to speak, in initiating and maintaining the
chemical and bio -electrical reaction called life. And if souls
exist as a kind of subtle energy, the transfer of the undetectable
-spark from one organism to another would conform to a
psychic law of the conservation of energy, and one could, of
course, give the doctrine a now fashionable embroidery by
discoursing on analogies with quantum mechanics. A soul thus
conceived could be the real personality of an individual, and not
entirely irrational explanations can be found for an incarnate
souks inability to remember its previous incarnations. Unlike
other religions, a faith in metempsychosis need involve nothing
that is demonstrably false.
The doctrine of metempsychosis was brought to its fullest
and most logical form by the Aryans of India, who perfected it
by combining with it the concept of karma ( karman ). 2 This
produces a grandiose system of psychic evolution that neatly
parallels the scientific fact of biological evolution. The indivi-
dual soul is presumed to have begun with the lowest and simplest
form of organic life and to have developed itself, through its
experiences and actions in each incarnation, ascending gradually
to ever higher forms of life and eventually to the higher mam-
mals, who become capable of conscious moral activity. By the
time that we become human beings (perhaps even before), the
moral quality of an individual’s actions automatically determine,
by an unalterable natural law, his social status and his fate
(i.e,, what happens to him, as distinct from what he does
voluntarily) in his next incarnation. If he discharges faithfully
his moral obligations in the status in which he is bom, he will
have a higher (and morally more demanding) status in his next
life, if, on tire other hand, he violates the morality of the
natural law, he will revert to a lower social status and suffer in it
condign tribulations, or, if his guilt exceeds such demotion, he
i everts to a subhuman mammal and has to progress to human
fonn once more.
This is, of course, a rational religion. Karma is governed by
2. When one cites Sanskrit nouns and adjectives, one does not give the
nominative singular, as in Greek and Latin, but the special base, or ‘pausa ’
.P™ useci m d * c tionaries and in grammatical treatises, from which
the inflected cases are derived.
2
Liberty Bell
a natural law inherent, like gravitation, in the structure of the
universe. There is no need for a theodicy, the intellectual reef
on which all monotheist religions are wrecked. There is no need
for a creator of an eternal universe and no function for a god
who intervenes in human affairs. One of the six orthodox
religious philosophies of India, the Nimvara-Safhkhya, is
frankly atheistic in the sense that it excludes a creating or
governing god, although it does admit higher forms of life to
which humans may evolve and thus become beings - that are
superhuman, just as we are supersimian.
If you must have a god, the alternate ( Sesvara ) system will
give you one who is like the god in Plato’s Politicus: he designed
and fashioned the perfect mechanism of the universe and, after
setting it in motion, left it to function automatically, giving no
further attention to it and its inhabitants. Only fools would try
to attract his attention by performing childish rites or whimper-
ing prayers, but by the moral law of the universe austerities and
self -mortification automatically (and regardless of an individual’s
intent in performing them) release the cosmic energy of tapas
and thus confer psychic powers that may be exerted in this or
in subsequent lives.
You will have seen that this is also a socially perfect religion.
However disagreeable may be your present status in life and
however great may be the injustice and suffering that you must
endure, you are thus expiating your moral errors in a preceding
life, while your fortitude in accepting without protest the
consequences of your past immorality automatically generates
the moral quality that will raise you to a higher status in your
next life. The doctrine even reconciles the races: a nigger is
assured that by good conduct he can ascend racially and even-
tually be bom an Aryan. 3 A society that fully accepts the
belief in karma is one in which discontent, social agitation,
political conflict, and revolutions are all impossible.
9
3. The stages of transition from the Vedas to the doctrine of the later
Upanisads is obscure, but one conjecture, drawn from the term d.vija
(Tom again’), applied only to Aryans, is that originally only Aryans were
thought capable of reincarnation, while black-skinned Dravidians and apes
were thought to perish like all other lower mammals. That was a biolo-
gically wholesome attitude, and an historian may regret that it was super-
seded by formulation of the complete scheme of spiritual evolution called
karma. By another conjecture, one regarding the origin of the caste
system, one can suppose that the civilized white race that preceded the
Aryans in the Indus Valley was included among the Torn again.’
December 1986 3
Such is the perfectly logical and coherent religion that the
Aryans in India fashioned from the religion of the J^g-veda that
was theirs when they invaded that subcontinent and which
they never formally repudiated, despite the implications of the
doctrine I set forth above. 4 The older religion and its analogues
naturally 'dominated! the great literature in Sanskrit. All belief
in hyper-physical phenomena was, for a time, challenged by the
strictly rational and materialistic (i.e., scientific) conception of
the universe and life called Lokayctu . 5 The religious concep-
tions of India were profoundly perturbed and altered by the dis-
astrous and egalitarian heresy called Buddhism, a religion that
had been fashioned from gross perversion of the austere and
profoundly pessimistic philosophy of Gautama. And the
common people, increasingly mongrelized by miscegenation in
defiance of the Aryan Laws of Manu, while never doubting
metempsychosis, sought to evade natural law by magic, that is,
by invoking the intervention of a god (e.g., Krishna) or goddess
(e.g, Kali) whom they pleased and flattered by sacrifices and
other acts of special devotion.
It would be pointless to mention here the wild variety of
grotesque sects, each with its gang of holy men intent on
exploiting the superstitions of the populace, that flourish in
modem India, but it may be relevant to give a glimpse of the
corruption of the old Aryan conception of reincarnation and
karma among the most highly cultivated Hindus of the age that
followed the rise of Buddhism in India. A good example is one
4. 1 have given a concise-perhaps too concise-summary of Hindu religions
and religious philosophies in Appendices A, B, and C to my translation of
the Mrcchakatlka (Little Clay Can); cf. Appendices D, E, and L. The
essentials can be learned from any good reference work.
5. In a very early article, written with Spenglerian fatalism, I wrote; “We
need not be astonished that Hindu skepticism enjoyed only a relatively
brief existence; no malism was ever more than transitory, for in philoso-
phy, as in daily life, men are naturally cowards and optimists. Skepsis
always consumes itself; it is a brilliant flame that, like a magnesium flare,
bursts forth for a moment in the tenebrous night, and then vanishes,
leaving the darkness more impenetrable than ever.” According to Spengler,
gerontic civilizations enter a period of “second religiosity” before they die;
we may now have reached that stage, Other and perhaps better explana-
tions are possible, such as the observed decline of the level of intelligence
in proletarian and multiracial societies, or the necessary effect of a civiliza-
tion that contravenes the innate instincts of our species. (I am thinking of
an extremely important article by Alan McGregor that will appear in. a
coming issue of th c Mankind Quarterly; I plan to consider it in connection
with the phenomena of sexual perversion.)
4
Liberty Bell
\
of the great works of Sanskrit literature, the Kadambari of Bana
(completed after his death, c. A.D. 650, by his less talented
son). It is written in the ornate and alembicated prose that is
esteemed as more poetic than verse— a mannered and artificial
style that reminds one of Euphuism, but paradoxically also
reminds one of the German style of Kant, for, given the incom-
parable lexical and syntactical suppleness of Sanskrit, it can be
said of Bana, as it was of Kant, that he often dives into a sen-
tence and comes up, several pages later, with the verb in his
mouth. The Kadambari is a work that was accessible only to the
most highly cultivated readers. 6
The story opens at the court of a famous king and dramatist,
Sudraka, whose very name shows that he was not a true Aryan.
(He cannot have been a ^udra, but he probably was a hybrid
like Dumas, his father's Aryan blood mingled with that of a
woman of lower race.) To him comes a Candala, a maiden of
wondrous beauty, although she belongs to the very lowest and
most despised caste. 7 (Don't worry: you will eventually
discover she is the goddess Lakshmi in disguise.) She presents
to the king a learned and eloquent parrot, who, after composing
verses in the king's honor, narrates a long and intricate romance,
inset with subordinate stories, which is the body of the work
but need not be outlined here. The wise parrot's discourse
6. If you have sufficiently mastered Sanskrit to read the Mahabhcirata or
the Katbasaritsagara without difficulty, you will find that reading Bai>a is
like breaking trail in three feet of snow. There is an English translation by
C. M. Riding (1906), which I have not seen. Aside from the inimitablv
ornate and poetic diction, Bana’s work has a considerable charm in its
sensitivity to the beauties of nature, but the late Arthur Berriedale Keith,
the foremost authority on Sanskrit literature, was certainly right in saying
that it will seem fantastic, uninteresting, and tedious to readers who have
no settled belief in metempsychosis.
7. The offspring of a white woman of the highest primary caste by a
brown-'skined male of the lowest is the result of miscegenation so r mon-
strous that he (or she) is particularly accursed. The descendants of such
persons are Candalas ; they are legally dead and must carry rattles to warn
of their approach so that decent persons can avoid ItheToathsome sight.
They serve as executioners and porters of corpses, since they cannot be
more polluted than they are by birth. They are, however, morally superior
to Englishmen and Americans, who commit the heinous crime of eating
beef and will therefore be reborn as pigs or worse.
December 1986
5
causes the "veil of ignorance’ 5 to fall from before the kind’s
eyes, and he learns of his earlier incarnations on earth and at
the behest of the disguised Lakshmi before she ascends ? to
heaven, he dies and eventually discovers that he is really Lord of
the Night, Regent of the Moon. His terrestrial sufferings have
atoned for the moral lapse that brought upon him the curse
that sent him to earth, so he rejoins his favorite wife and wins
Kadambarl, the maiden whom he especially loves and long
desired in vain. The three thereafter dwell in his lunar orb
together with their friends and associates, but from time to time'
revisit the two terrestrial kingdoms that belong to them.
You will not need to be shown how drastically this story
departs from the basic simplicity and rationality of the Aryan
doc urine of karma that I outlined above, I have mentioned it
expressly to show how the pure doctrine of karma can survive
contamination by notiohs of deities who intervene in earthly
affairs,^ incarnate divinities, and even the mystical efficacy of
curses, That should make us cautious in criticizing modem
adaptations of the doctrine that are designed for popularity
today. *
The concept of a transmigration of souls is, as I have said,
native to our race. It. reappeared frequently in the literature of
the Nineteenth Century (e.g„ in two of Edgar Allen Poe’s most
memorable short stories or Theophile Gautier’s Avatar ), Lang-
don Smith spontaneously saw the parallel between metempsy-
chosis and biological evolution in his one well-known, poem,
When you were a tadpole and I was a fish,/ In the Paleozoic
time. In our century , the concept has been popularized by the
“memories” of “Bridey” Murphy, Joan Grant, “Taylor Cald-
well (Mrs. Marcus Reback), and others, The doctrine, further-
more, is susceptible of a kind of “proof.”
Most literate persons read in their youth vivid tales set in
ancient or transcend en tally exotic cultures, such as Ryder
Haggard’s She, Flaubert’s Salammbo , Georg Ebers ’ Der Kaiser,
Merejkowski’s Tutenchamon auf Kreta , Maseras’ Ildaribal
Pierre Louys Aphrodite , or any of a hundred others. Such
stories, set in a panorama of a vanished civilization, make a deep
impression on the minds of youthful readers, but fade from the
conscious mind in subsequent decades. As the readers, especial-
ly if they are female, approach or enter middle age, their
8. The parrot is an estimable young man who was reborn as a parrot
because he was cursed, not by a holy man as is so common in Hindu story,
but only by a maiden whom he had wearied with protestations of love,
^ Liberty Bell
I , youthful impressions, nan: fee* recalled! m hypnosis; they nagy
f spontaneously mistake them for memories, of a past incarnation,
|f and they will almost certainly do so, if they have been prepared
for a “past life regression” by a skilled hypnotist.
f _ There should, therefore, be a large and active market, for a
new religion based qn metempsychosis and! karma, now that
Mme. Blavatsky’s Theosophy is quite worn outL. It, is; not easy , •
however, to estimate the potential of Reincapiaiijion,, Incorpor-
rated.
The forty pages of its tabloid, half of them written by one
man, are chiefly devoted to glowing descriptions of how won-
derful it is to be a “New Age Activist,” and they have compara-
. tively little to say about a specific metaphysical doctrine, One
principal theme is a vehement but entirely justified polemic
against the Jesus-jerks of the “Moral Majority” and “New
Christian Right,” who are so lavishly promoted by the Jews/
boob;4ubes and; have already excited such mindless fanaticism
that one of the chief hokum-peddlers has set himself up as a
candidate for the Presidency, and the Revolutionary Tribunal in
Washington has shown ominous signs of coming to a working
agreement with the crude communism of early Judaeo-Christian
cults. One can only applaud the polemic, which gives the new
religion a present utility.
The bits of doctrine that one can gather from obiter dicta
scattered through the forty pages indicate that the basic doc-
| trines of karma have been incorporated in am odd mishmash.
The sect teaches acceptance of the world as it is, and that is
good, but then we encounter a blob of Christian sentimentality
i in the strange affirmation that. “the Law of Grace supersedes
the Law of Karma... All your positive and loving thoughts and
actions go to cancel out your stored-up bad karma.” Now this
directly contravenes the basic doctrine, according to which
sentiments and thoughts have no effect in themselves, and
actions are all that count. The word karman means *a’n act,
deed,’ and is in some writings taken as an antithesis to belief
and the kind of thought that does not result in physical action.
Thus karmanurupa may designate what is in accord with a
constant action or function, such as a chemical reaction, as well
as the conduct and fate of a man that are in accord with his
actions in a previous life. It is the latter conception, of course,
that is fundamental to the religio -philosophical doctrine that
takes its name from karman .
Then we are told “everyone is here on earth to fulfill their
December 1986 7
[sj'c] dharrna and to resolve their karma by rising above fear snH
learnmg to express unconditional love ” I am not sure what
means Dharma is ‘duty, propriety, justice,’ and hence thp
prescribed conduct of a man (or woman) in the social status and
position to which he (or she) has been born. Fulfilling those ?
obligations faithfully advances one spiritually; violation of that -t
duty will result in rebirth in a lower and more unpleasant status '
It is the dharma of a slave to serve -his master loyally; the I
dharma of a soldier, to slay the enemies of his king; and the I
dharma of a king (as is so clearly stated in the famous Arthasas- !
tra), to be merciless toward criminals and subversives, and to
root them out, even by using a corps of agents provocateurs.
There isnt a word about bubbling with love, conditional or
unconditional.
The “New Age Activists,” we are told, “will be an army of
people armed with love” and they will “replace repression and
ear with peace and light.” So we end with more of the old
uncombe. Such pie may be served in the sky, but it will never
be found on earth, and it is a peat disservice to arouse an
appetite for an imaginary confection. I suppose this nonsense
was put in to stimulate the glands of compulsive do-gooders.
I refrain from commenting on the two-page spiel by a
certain Joseph Goldstein, who twice assures us that “Sexual
misconduct can most easily be understood as refraining r ! 1
rom those actions of sensuality which cause pain and harm to
others. If he means what he says, he should laud the famous
Marquis de Sade, who was most emphatically not guilty of such
misconduct*
What is most disturbing is that Reincarnation, Incorporated,
carries with it a whole passel of fakirs and mystery -mongers, all
eager to perform magic if you cross their palms with silver. One
female will bang a Tibetan gong (probably made in Brooklyn)
to help you remember your past lives in Tibet and to “facili-
tate.. the nsmg of the Kundalini.” I forbear asking about her
qualifications, but in my quite limited reading in the sources, if
memory does not deceive me, it was implied that only males
have a kundalini a cute psychic snake that issues from the
sexu organs, climbs up the spine, and enters the brain to fill it
with transcendence.
There are “psychics” who will read your destiny from tea
eaves, from quartz crystals (giving you “crystal energetics”),
from the palms of your hands, just as they used to do in the
• tents of the old carnivals. “International authorities” will teach
° Liberty Bell
/
you how to raise your “vibrational level” and will introduce
you to “spirit guides,” just waiting to act as your unseen (but
not unpaid) cicerone and show you the sights of spookland;
how to have fun in trances, even if you don’t know what you
are doing; how to work up enough “psychic ability” to remem-
ber at least three of your past lives; and how to get such a big
dose of awareness that you will be “attuned to the awesome
power that guides the universe” and make “love’s psychic
dimensions” work for you. “Top parapsychologists” will teach
you how to have “extra-sensory perception” and “nurture your
ESP ability,” to the astonishment of your friends. (That should
be lots of fun, but my guess is that any card-sharp could teach
you more about stacking a deck of cards— and would do it for
less.) And to complete the show, there are astrologers all over
the lot, and all of them have got computers now and can tell
you with scientific accuracy just what the planets, including
Pluto and, I suppose, the larger asteroids, such as Vesta, Ceres,
and Pallas, are going to do to you tomorrow. One wizard, who
has the same address as Reincarnation, Incorporated, will, for
only $16.00, jiggle his “IBM System 36” computer for you and
give you a printout to “bring energy to each part of your
personality”— and, you know, a big computer like that just
couldn’t make a mistake.
Now I am sure that some prospective customers will be
repelled by some or all of those side-shows and turn away from
the main tent, and others will be displeased by the somewhat
inept collocation on page 9 of “the liberal leadership, New Age
practitioners, homosexuals (estimated at over 40 million)” as
three groups, presumably equally precious, who will be run into
“Nazi death camps,” if the awful “Fascists” get control after
the impending collapse of this ruined and bankrupt country.
What I do not profess to know is what percentage of potential
customers will be alienated by such ingredients in the. mish-
mash.
The potentiality of Reincarnation, Incorporated, further-
more, is delimited by the fact that if a. new religion is to attract
multitudes, it must exhibit a great novelty and seem to be
radically new. It must differ drastically from all religions in
vogue when it is introduced. The new cult, however, offers
only crambe reptita, warmed-over cabbage. The chatter about
“love” and “higher consciousness” and “transcendental values”
that Theosophy peddled in its hey-day, when such figments of
the imagination differed attractively from the dreary quibbles
Decern ber 1 986 9
of Christian theology, are now stale and tedious; they are
offered today by a hundred competing sects and with only
slight variations.
To give a specific example: What does Reincarnation
Incorporated, offer that is not also offered by the Stelle Group
which I mentioned obiter in Liberty Bell , August 1984, p. 13?
The differences are only in the trimmings of the worn-out
garments.
If a new religion based on metempsychosis and karma is to
command wide adherence, it must offer some doctrine that is
not now tediously familiar to everyone who has gone shopping
in the salvation-marts.
In sum, then, I am inclined to believe that the new religion
is perhaps fatally flawed as it comes from its makers, and I
should suppose that it has little chance of becoming more than
just another weird cult for people who want to believe whatever
is incredible. But when I remember the jumble of inconsistent
and even antithetical ideas in all of the most popular cults in
India, of which the best is illustrated by the Kadambafi y I
prudently refrain from categorical predictions about what
Weishaupt’s “marvellous mind of man” cannot be made to
believe.
* * *
THE BALANCING ACT
In the American Atheist for April 1966, Madalyn O’Hair
published an exegesis of one of the early Jewish hoaxes, the
preposterous tale called Exodus in the Jew-book. As everyone
knows, it is an absurd story of how the vicious and sadistic god
whom the Jews created in their own image afflicted the Egyp-
tians, in all the ways a depraved imagination could invent, so
that his chosen predators could gloat over the suffering of the
goyim. The tale, of course, is no more historical than any story
in the Arabian Nights , although it is more disgusting. It is
simply fiction of wish-fulfillment, devised so that the Jews
could enjoy in imagination a momentary satisfaction of their
insatiable hatred of civilized mankind. But it also served as a
hoax, comparable in audacity to their recent “Holocaust,” by
which they indulge their venomous hatred of the Germans, a
people who tried to emancipate themselves from servitude to
their parasites.
10
Liberty Bell
Incredible as it should seem, the Jews, through their
Christian subsidiary, put oyer the hoax about their “exodus”
from Egypt, making stupid goyim believe the crude fiction was
historical and that the impossible events described in it had
actually occurred. Even today, many Christian dervishes claim
that the whole of the frowzy and grotesque Jew -book is “the
verbally inspired, infallible, inerrant Word of God.” Mrs.
O ’Hair’s exegetical paraphrase of the wild story is both accurate
and hilarious, and it would be salutary reading for the probably
numerous Christians whose minds were not permanently
deformed in childhood.
What interests us in the article are the introductory para-
graphs in which Mrs. O’Hair reports an experience that is a
perfect example of the technique that is used to keep Americans
befuddled.
i
To her astonishment, a radio station invited her to give a
half-hour presentation of the case for atheism. When she
arrived at the station, however, she found present a Catholic
priest, “decked out in the usual black garb, obviously in mourn-
ing for the death of his brains,” and a rabbi, who “sported a
dinky, somewhat dirty, doily on the top of his head.” The
sleek hireling who was conducting the interview explained that
the station had to present “all sides” and give a “balanced”
presentation. When it was pointed out that, by that criterion,
whenever howling dervishes make their pitch for the Jesus-
business, an atheist should participate to “balance” the presen-
tation, the shyster was aghast; he wriggled and explained that
there weren’t enough atheists to make it good business for the
station.
The two hokum-peddlers, the Jew and his Christian under-
study, naturally began with a typically dishonest attack on the
speaker, and the “moderator” joined them in their yapping.
Mrs. O’Hair had about six minutes in which to ward off the
attacks, but even so, she evidently made a better presentation
than the schemers expected, for the taped interview was never
broadcast.
This is a perfect example of what “fairness” and “balanced
presentation” mean in the various media of communication, the
daily press, the radio, and the boob-tubes, all of which are
either owned or otherwise controlled by the predatory race.
The hireling in the radio station who set the trap for the
speaker was only one of the innumerable pimps who exploit the
gullibility of the ignorant masses. It is possible, of course, that
December 1986 H
he believed the hackneyed sales-talk of the holiness-vendors
their unproven and dubious claim that their superstition some- "
how reduces the incidence of crime . 1 He could have been
convinced that religion was a “social good,” and therefore to be
promoted, as the Fathers of the Church promoted their cult, by
every sort of trickery and mendacity, the end supposedly
justifying the means. Butwhat the mannikin may have believed
is irrelevant. There is only one relevant fact: he had a job.
He had a job— and with it, the morality of a slave. He was a
creation of the most potent and least noticed device that the
Jews use to destroy the civilization and race they hate, poison-
ing the one and enslaving the other. That device has been
presented to the unthinking public as two forms of social
organization that are made to seem antithetical, Communism
and Capitalism, although they are really complementary and
like two sides of one coin, since one implies the other. Thus
persons who mistake propaganda for reality fail to see that
the function of both is to abolish private property and thus
reduce the entire population to effective slavery. The imposi-
tion of Communism on Americans has thus far been primarily
carried out by the corporations created by financiers with the
1 . A more valid claim for religion was generally accepted in the Nineteenth
Century, when faith in the supernatural was regarded as a prophylactic
against subversion and revolution, That was largely a consequence of the
French Revolution, which is often called “atheistic” because Hebert and
his followers, who were stridently atheistic, were prominent in the early
stages of the Revolution and until the devious Robespierre had their heads
c opped off. In his denunciation of them, Robespierre, appealing to the
egalitarian frenzy of the crazed nation, charged that “atheism is aristo-
™ c ; ( Hebert was the son of a bankrupt goldsmith, but the inventor of
World Government for World Peace, Jean Baptiste du Val-de-Grace, alias
Anacharsis Clootz, was a Baron of Dutch origin with an estate in Prussia.)
Robespierre was a deist who believed in the necessity of religion, and after
he cleverly used the “Hebertistes” and the “Dantonistes” to destroy each
i e3 \ 1£ . had their heads Amputated, he celebrated the return to religion
with the famous Fete de 1’Etre Supreme (1794), just before the Terror was
accelerated into the phase of most intense and wholesale butchery. The
savagery and horror of the French Revolution induced George Washington
who was also a deist, to include a strong recommendation of religion in his
Farewell Address (1796). He carefully avoided mention, of Christianity,
but that hoes not stop Jesus’s sales-force from claiming his endorsement.
The claim that Christianity is a stabilizing force in civilized society has,
of course been conclusively refuted by the fact that the great majority of
its influential holy men, whether Catholic or Protestant, are now Com-
munist agitators, although theypreferto talk, with characteristic hypocrisy,
of a social gospel” or “liberation theology.” They have reverted to
primitive Judaeo-Chnstian Bolshevism
12
Liberty Bell
i
aid of counterfeit currency. And few have been sufficiently
alert to notice what was happening.
Even fifty years ago , after the Jews and their accomplices
had already destroyed the primacy of landed wealth, the one
sure guarantee of such liberty as is humanly possible, the
average American town had its “leading citizens,” the owner of
the local hotel, the owner of the local department store, the
owner of the local foundry or factory, and men similarl y
situated, who had the power to make their own decisions and
hence the independence that goes with the ownership of proper-
ty. Today they are all gone, replaced by “managers,” the
hirelings of corporations that are owned by corporations that
are in turn owned by the freebooters of what is called “inter-
national finance.” And, in conformity with the strategy of
uprooting Americans, the “managers” are periodically shipped
from one part of the country to another, having no real home.
If the corporations were replaced, as in Russia, by the state, no
one would notice a significant social difference.
The manager has a job, not a position. He is told what he
must do, and he can “get ahead” only by doing it efficiently to
the satisfaction of the manager above him, who is similarly
situated and dependent on his superior in a chain that goes back
and back to financiers of whom the underlings do not even
know the names. And the managers, wherever they are in the
chain, have less opportunity for self-respect than their meanest
employees. The charwoman can always find another job.
Managers may sometimes shift from one corporation to another,
but only if they have “made good” in slavish obedience to their
preceding masters. The charwoman can always escape from her
small debts. The manager, like most Americans, is hopelessly in
debt. He is probably married, but does not have a wife: he only
cohabits with a woman who has a job of her own. They are
probably “buying” an overpriced house, unaware that they are
only renting it from tax-collectors and usurers. They are
likewise “buying” automobiles, which have been made a neces-
sity, and also elaborate boob-tubes, and a hundred other gadgets
they imagine part of a “good life” that is a perpetual discontent
with they know not what.
The hirelings who produce radio and television programs
have jobs . 2 Their job is to keep the public befuddled, and unless
2. Years ago, there were a few men who imagined they really owned local
radio stations and thus had the freedom to broadcast programs that
December 1 986
13
they are very stupid, they know it. A man with such a job may
soothe his conscience, if he still has one, by telling himself, or
even by believing, that he is promoting a “social good.” But as
he swallows tranquillizers to quiet his nerves and pills to quiet
his ulcers, he knows that his job depends on doing his master’s
bidding. He must promote religion and shield it from intelligent
criticism. He must promote the vast nexus of corruption called
“democracy” and prevent exposure of what it really is. And,
above all, he must beware of making a Jew frown. Economical-
ly he is a slave and intellectually he is a pimp.
He hopes to delude observers by chattering about “fairness”
and “freedom of information” and “balanced programs,” but
he knows that his job is to prevent such things. He must
prevent atheists from impugning the gospel-racket; he must
prevent “racists” from mentioning the simple facts of biology
that his unsophisticated audience would recognize as obvious, if
they thought about the evidence of their own quotidian experi-
ence ; he must prevent honest historians from publicly question-
ing the Jews’ great Holohoax, that absurd lie by. which they
achieved much of their present power. He is expected to
employ every dirty trick and dishonest device to keep the
public ignorant and deluded. He must neglect no opportunity
to ridicule or defame the rash individuals who disobey his
masters. And if, despite all the efforts of press, radio, and
television, the American pigs become a little restless, he must
obey the order to man the pumps and squirt some more sludge
on them. The poor pimp knows his job depends on satisfying
his owners. ,
It does no good to rail at the pimps; in their situation, they
really have no feasible choice. It does no good to call for
accuracy in the media. One may expose a lie here and there, if
it is about something trivial, but the effort is like trying to
control a flooded river with a bucket. It does no good to wish
were not Kosher, They were quickly put out of business by the Federal
Communications Commission,
3 . About a quarter of a century ago, a standard trick of professional liars
was exhibited in the best cartoon ever published by National Review. The
drawing showed an announcer seated between two supposed opponents
and saying, as I recall, “Now for our debate. Here on my left is that
genial, liberal humanitarian, Joe Doddy, who believes that Foreign Aid
should be increased by 300%, And here on 'my right is his adversary, that
arch-conservative reactionary, Jacob Blow, who believes that Foreign Aid
should be increased by only lOC^.”
Liberty Bell
that the American boobs had not taken “spiritual” bait and
given themselves into slavery, making of themselves domesticated;
animals who have surrendered their freedom in exchange for
routinely provided fodder. They are now living on Orwell’s
Animal Farm. And if you persist in clinging to some hope,
realize that it depends on some catastrophic eolapse of the
intricate but rotten structure at a time when there is still a
minority of intelligent Aryans who will recognize their last
opportunity when it comes if it does.
In the meantime, thank Mrs. O’Hair for having given us so
clear an illustration of one major factor in our dolorous plight.
* * *
TRIUMPHANT ECUMENISM
1 Most Americans will remember that in January 1959 afoul
and probably part-Jewish murderer named Fidel Castro seized
the Island of Cuba with the surreptitious support of the govern-
ment in Washington, which was implementing Lenin’s strategy
of encircling the United States before it falls, “like a ripe fruit,”
into the hands of Judaeo -Communist “World Government.”
And the Jews’ leading liepaper, the New York Times, assured
American suckers that the bearded monster was an agrarian
reformer” and the “George Washington of Cuba, while oui
domestic pests, the rabble of neurotics who" call themselves
“intellectuals” because they vociferate so loudly, went into
hysterical ecstasies over the “great democratic leader” and spat
at their betters. When the Communist base so near our shores
was well established in 1961, the government of which
Jackanapes Kennedy was the front-man made Castro’s power
absolute by betraying into his hands, with the treachery for
which Americans are now famed throughout the world, the
anti-Communists in Cuba in a complex operation of which only
the prearranged massacre at the Bay of Pigs became generally
known. .
When the monster came into power in 1959, one of his first
reforms was a violent liquidation of the Catholic Church in
Cuba by killing or driving into exile all the clergy and ecclesiatics,
except the few who were willing to become his shepherds.
That, you will remember, was before the Jews consolidated
their control of the Vatican.
Now we learn from the Wall Street Journal, 19 September
December 1986 ^
1986, that “Castro has declared that he is a Christian— a state-
ment that has led to mass conversions among tire old revolu-
tionary guard. Now hardly a day passes without some promi-
nent Cuban Communist discovering that he has always been a
Christian at heart.” The present Archbishop of Havana, Jaime
Ortega, like so many prelates and priests throughout Central
and South America, has been chanting hosannas to the bloody
degenerate for years, and he has now seconded Castro’s invita-
tion to Papa John Paul II to visit his faithful sons in Cuba.
In the meantime, filthy Fidel has become a theologian and
has had someone mix for him a pail of pious slop that will be
smeared on paper by Simon & Schuster, a publishing firm that
reportedly paid $1,300,000 for the privilege of vending Castro
on Religion to half-witted Americans.
The Vatican announces that the Pope may visit Cuba in
1987 to hob-nob with his new buddy and celebrate another
triumph for the ecumenical movement and the religion the Jews
made for goyim.
Surprised? What did I tell you?
* * *
WHAT IS NEXT?
Rational predictions of the future can be made only by
dispassionately reasoning from available information that, on
critical examination, appears to be reliable. Obviously, any
deficiency in the accuracy or adequacy of the information will
produce a : great deviation in the inferences drawn from it, much
as ah error of a fraction of an inch in sighting a rifle will send
the bullet many feet away from the target. If one understands
that necessary limitation, one can make logical conjectures
about the near future.
• Liberty Bell is not a newspaper, but, as I write, it seems
likely that its American readers may first learn from it news of
capital importance, which changes a conjecture made on the
basis of general probability into an ascertained fact with which
we must henceforth reckon.
On 5 October 1986 the Sunday Times (London) could
congratulate itself on one of the greatest “scoops” in the
history of journalism. It is said that in New York the editors of
the Post alertly picked up the news and put it on the presses
with appropriate headlines, but peremptory orders from the
16 Liberty Bell
l
| owner, a Jew named Murdoch, Sowed Mxexn ;to ; replace .and
I destroy the copies that had been printed with information he
I wanted concealed from the American swine, lest they become
restive in their sty .
The Sunday Times carried a headline .in 18 & -point ;type,
“Revealed: the secrets of Israel’s nuclear ^arsenal,” which
introduced three pages of articles, complete with (phof.qgraphs
and an architectural plan, written by r a team -of : six reporters,
assisted by. four research consultants. The scientific :data in the
article were verified and its authenticity certified by ten “senior
scientists,” some of whom are named. The Jews, of course,
denied everything so long as they could and then refused to
comment.
What had happened was that Mordeehai Vanunu, a techni-
cian employed for almost ten years in the secret plant in which
the Jews manufacture nuclear bombs, defected from Israel and,
whether he intended it or not, also defeated from his world-
(• destroying race, taking with him more than sixty color photo -
graphs that he had found opportunities to take inside the huge
plant of six storeys, all buried beneath a seemingly ordinary
| building at Dimona in the Negev Desert, on the road from
(j Beersheba to Sodom. When American curs of high rank insisted
I' on visiting Dimona, they were reluctantly permitted to see parts
< of the building on the surface after the entrances to the six
storeys of the underground installation had been bricked up.
Although Americans will soon be taught .that they must
l never think about what is done by the masters whom they must
| adore, such thought has not yet been legally forbidden and the
f penalties for it have thus far been informally exacted. Years
j ago, therefore, some of us dared to infer that the Jews were
1 busy producing a stock-pile of the most advanced nuclear
weapons after large quantities of uranium were stolen from the
United States by Israeli agents with the cooperation, needless to
say, of Jews ensconsed in the gullible Americans’ atomic agency.
But perhaps ‘stolen’ is the wrong word. For all practical pur-
poses, the Jews now own the United States and all the livestock
in it, so how can one say that they stole their own property? •
Observers who knew something of the mentality and
methods of Yahweh’s Master Race were, as I have said, con-
| vinced that while the Jews kept their American cattle jabbering
1 about “world peace” and similar childish fantasies, they were
; hard at work in Israel, which is to be the capital of their “One
j World” Empire, secretly manufacturing nuclear weapons for use
[ Decern ber 1 986 1 7
against goyim whenever expedient. But that was only a con
elusion drawn from a logical extrapolation from the little that
was known, and there were no ascertained facts to confirm it.
Now, thanks to Vanunu, it is indubitable that the Jews, for
the past twenty years or more, have been producing in their
secret plant in Israel nuclear bombs of the most advanced
design, certainly thermonuclear bombs, including, in the opinion
of experts, the dreaded hydrogen bomb which Oppenheimer
and other high-minded Jews, whom the Americans had put in
charge of the development of atomic weapons, tried to prevent
the American cattle from learning how to produce — the hydro-
gen bomb which was used so effectively by our subversive
propagandists to scare Americans silly and make them jabber
about “disarmament,” on the premise that all other peoples
were as imbecile as they.
The Sunday Times describes in great detail the plant at
Dimona, the equipment on each of the six undergound storeys,
the manufacture of nuclear bombs, and the elaborate verification
that the newspaper prudently obtained from experts before it
printed its “scoop.” The one essential fact is that Israel, through
its possession of a large stock of the most destructive armaments
known ^to man, is one of the world’s formidable military
powers. The details given on the three large newspaper pages
and the photographs that accompany them are interesting, but
cannot be summarized here. 2
1. Whether the United States or Israel is the more formidable nuclear
power is an interesting question. The United States boas ts that it has
27,000 afomic weapons;” most of these are small and intended fdr <.
tactical use on a battlefield, but it may be taken for granted that the
United States has more bombs of high-power than Israel. Against this
must be set three crucial factors, videlicet: (1) Americans, their minds
filled with Christian drivel, are frantically opposed to the use of the most
modern weapons, and many of them are so moronic they want to destroy
our stockpile to set a good example for the Soviets, whom they suppose to
bd equally feeble-minded; (2) Our armed forces are so honeycombed with
traitors and aliens that any attempt to use such weapons against the Soviet
and possibly against any other nation or country would surely be sabo-
taged; and (3) No use of such weapons could be made without the permis-
sion of the Jews, who now are in total control of the government in
Washington that has all Americans at its mercy. The Jews have no masters
but themselves and are too intelligent to place idle fancies ahead of their
own racial advantage or to admit enemies into their armed forces and
government.
2. Vanunu s defection seems to have been motivated, at least in part, by
his failure to be as violently anti-Semitic as most Jews; he even seems to
Liberty Bell
Now that it is known (except to the American people) that
( “poor little Israel” is one of the earth’s major nuclear powers,
I and is quite capable of annihilating every city of any importance
I in the Islamic countries whose territory she intends eventually
* to take, the Jews, who refrained from using atomic weapons
? against Egypt in 1973 because they didn’t want the despised
i goyim to perceive the extent of their military power, no longer
have a secret to preserve in that way, and the only question is
when they will think it expedient to use some part of what
must by this time be a very large stock of the most potent
weapons in the world.
This alters to some extent our extrapolations from the
present to the future.
Jim Taylor’s report from Oman in the September issue was
one of the most important articles that Liberty Bell has pub-
lished, and the conclusions you drew from it were amply
corroborated and confirmed by admissions that the government
in Washington thought it expedient to make, rather than
jf attempt a categorial denial when the report was published. The
Associated Press, in a despatch published in many newspapers
(e.g., the Fort Collins Coloradoan) on 25 July, had reported
what could scarcely have been successfully concealed, large-
scale manoeuvres of the 35,000 American soldiers who are
being intensively equipped and trained for desert warfare,
admittedly in preparation for their use “to restore order in a
Mideast country,” The United Press, on 9 August (in, e.g., the
Arizona Republic ), published the “first public acknowledge-
ment” that military supplies have been stockpiled in Oman,
“for use by U. S. troops who 'may be called into action in an
emergency in that region,” where, as Mr. Taylor reported and
have had sympathy for the Semitic populations of the Near East, whom
the Jews of Israel hate and despise as much as they do their American
subjects. As I write, it is reported that Vanunu has “disappeared.” If the
Jews kidnapped him, it will be a long time before he is permitted to die,
The plant at Dimona was constructed and equipped for the Jews by tire
French, who kept the underground structure secret and claimed that the
structure visible on the surface was only for research into the “peaceful
use” of atomic power on a small scale. Americans are such dunderheads
that they wanted to help the world to “peaceful use” of such power, and,
of course, the countries they helped, such as India and Pakistan, were not
so stupid that they did not use the equipment to produce atomic arma-
ments for eventual use against their enemies.
Decern ber 1 986 1 9
♦
Washington at last admitted, American and Omani troops have
been drilling in anticipation of that “emergency.” The supplies
include more than 10,000,000 gallons of fuel for jet fighters
and bombers .
It has long been obvious to anyone who thought seriously
about the situation in Asia Minor and the Arabian Peninsula
that the focus of the Jews’ hatred of the “Arabs” is Saudi
Arabia, for if that nation is destroyed, the other Islamic nations
will be effectively demoralized. It may be taken for granted,
therefore, that Saudi Arabia is the Jews’ principal target,
whether or not it is the country that the Jews order their
Americans to attack first.
It is no great secret that the C.I.A., as an auxiliary of the
Mossad, has long been working to undermine Saudi Arabia,
doubtless from the spy base in Oman that Mr. Taylor described,
and it was probably with justice that the C.I.A, was suspected
of having contrived the mad Shi’ite seizure of Mecca some years
ago. With all the resources of American taxpayers at their
disposal, the C.I.A.-Mossad complex could incite a “democratic”
revolution in Saudi Arabia by suborning native traitors or by
sending in a force of Shi’ites. The big-hearted Americans could
then “help” the Saudi government by sending in the usual
“peace-keeping force,” which would, as usual, be used to
intensify civil war and eventually stage “free elections” to hand
the country over to the enemies of civilized mankind. Action
against Saudi Arabia would be especially attractive because (1)
the simple-minded Americans could be fed the usual slop about
the evils of monarchy, for which they have a traditional appe-
tite; and (2) temporary or permanent destruction of the great
oil fields would permit herding the Americans with an “energy
crisis” more real than the fake one of a few years ago. (Try to
imagine an American severed from his automobile!)
If it is preferred to start the attack on Saudi Arabia indi-
rectly, there are so many easy ways that one cannot guess which
would be chosen. The so-called “terrorism” of the Islamic
states, which served Reagan, in his role as Heap Big Chief Sitting
Bull, as a pretext for his terrorist attack on Libya, might be
used, but seems unlikely, although it is to be noted that Syria,
which proclaimed solidarity with Libya a little while ago, was
taught a lesson by the performance in London that gave the
Jews’ shabbat goyah, Maggie Thatcher, a pretext for insultingly
breaking diplomatic relations with Syria, 3
3 , It is true, of course, that the Islamic nations of the Near East, like the
20
Liberty Bell
The ruling consideration here is the attitude of the Ameri-
can herds. Any pretext, of course, would serve for old Ronnie
to send in the Air Force and the specially trained troops, as he
pan do any monent his directors give him the order, and that
force would suffice to smash up the Arab countries and create
enough chaos and bloodshed to please the Jews, but, as Mr.
Taylor hinted in his article, it would surely be advantageous to
involve the Americans in another Vietnam or, if possible,
something better. If a whole plane-load of Yahweh s Super-
humans were really destroyed, the average American would
merely shrug his shoulders instead of becoming bellicose. The
only act of “Arab terrorism” that could be blown up into a
Crusade would be an assassination of old Ronnie, and this is a
distinct possibility. He is becoming something of an embar-
rassment anyway and if he were blown up to Heaven and the
wicked Moslems blamed for it, his Ascension would stir up all
the boobs who still' imagine that he is a great “conservative” or
revere him as an ally of the evangelical witch-doctors. It
would be easy to manufacture evidence that the ambassador of
some Moslem country had made the bomb in his kitchen some
night and with his own diabolical hands, and there could be
oratory about an outrage to the (imaginary) dignity of the
“American people.” So this is a possiblity to be borne in mind,
but it would be a relatively awkward way to start a war as
distinct from “hotting up” a war already started.
A better scheme would be to sink some ships, tankers or
dispossessed Pales tinian s, have no more effective means of opposing the
enormous power of the Jews and their American and Soviet colonies than
“terrorism,” such as the British and Americans used against France after
the German victory, hiring for that purpose virtually all the criminals in
France and paying them in gold (American eagles or small, specially cast
bars of gold) since the apaches were too canny to take colored paper in
payment. So it was plausible enough to claim that some blundering Syrian
had tried to destroy an airplane loaded with the only precious form of
human life by putting a bomb in the luggage of a pregnant woman, where
it was, of course, easily and inevitably discovered, It is unlikely but
conceivable that some one in the Syrian Embassy knew that such an
attempt would be made and did not point out how certainly it would fail.
What is preposterous is that it could have been possible to prove that the
Syrian Ambassador was a party to such an attempt. That would have been
absurd, even if the attempt had not been so childishly awkward. The
Syrians may be amateurs in the great game of diplomacy , but they surely
know better than that. And that is the detail which shows that the whole
trumpery affair was the work of Jewish agents.
December 1986
21
American naval vessels, in the Straits of Hormuz with bombs
dropped from an American plane that could be disguised as
coming from either Iran or Iraq. 4 As you saw from the little
map that accompanied Jim Taylor’s report, Oman is on the
border of Saudi Arabia and faces Iran across the Straits, while
Iraq is at the head of the Persian Gulf. It would be easy to
launch a reprisal against either Iran or Iraq, whichever is
selected for the operation. And since a war between Iraq and
Iran is now being waged sporadically, the other country would
become our ally and the usual American “help” could be given
it to destroy it, too. And Saudi Arabia could be penetrated by
a “peace keeping” force to “protect” and betray it.
An alternative would be to incite a revolt in Iran as a
pretext for the usual “peace-keeping” operation. Whichever
scheme is chosen, it would obviously be best to destroy the oil
fields at the very beginning. That would impoverish the Arabs,
but the real advantage would be that it would make gasoline
rare in the United States. If there is anything that can make an
American fighting mad and I mean mad — it would be being
deprived of his cherished and almost indispensable go-cart. And
that, in turn, would be an ideal opportunity to invoke the
President’s power to relocate his subjects, throwing families out
of their homes to “save energy” by turning the houses over to
persons employed in the vicinity, preferably niggers or spiks.
In the present situation, Vanunu’s courageous revelation of
Israel s secret will not be disadvantageous to Jewry, If Ameri-
cans find out about it, some of them, especially the horde of
peace-lubbers, may be indignant, but the Jews need no longer
care what their subjects think, except to discipline them if they
think out loud. The real effect of the disclosure is profoundly
to discourage the Semites, who, already confronted by the
overwhelming power of the United States and the passive
hostility of the Soviets, now find themselves menaced by a
terrifying weapon that hysterical propaganda has made to seem
even more ternble than it really is. This will inevitably incite
4. It will be remembered that when Begin, the celebrated terrorist, best
known for dynamiting the King David Hotel to kill British swine, was the
Pnme Minister of Israel, he was officially censured by the Jews’ parliament
for having failed to disguise the bombers (made in U.S.A.) that he sent on
a terrorist raid on Iraq : he should have disguised them as Iranian planes
and thus started the desired war between Iran and Iraq. The war was
successfully instigated later, and is exacerbated by religious antagonisms
that it would be too long to describe here.
22
Liberty Bell
defeatism and agitation by Islamic cowards for surrender.
It is now possible for the Jews to take over the lands they
most covet without using their Americans, compelling the
Semitic nations to surrender by threats or by making Damascus
or Baghdad a lesson more appalling than Hiroshima was made
by the primitive little atomic bomb that was used there. This,
however, is unlikely, for that would prevent afflicting the
Americans 'with a new and better Vietnam, in which our men
and resources could be squandered on an ever greater scale, and,
what would be even nicer, opposition to the war could be called
“anti-American” to excite the fanaticism of the proletariat and
liquidate all remaining reluctance to serve Yahweh and his
righteous supermen.
This discussion of strategy and tactics is entirely conjectural,
I need not say, but it is safe to assume that “another Vietnam”
is scheduled for the near future, and will be begun in some
clever way, unless in the meantime there should be discovered
some even more effective means of harassing the American
cattle and herding them into the pens prepared for them in the
■ - ■ n
great stockyard.
f
December 1986
111 ^^
Please help us expose
THE BIGGEST JEWISH LIE!
* A •
V-C^v-V'' . Z-v *vi'' ;
Please help us spread
. THE TRUTH!
• A .’•* , ’ ’ • .Av.n . -•
' -t •, S S..''- *■?...,! / •'
mm i
Order extra copies of
THE HOAX OF THE 20th
CENTURY
at these prices:
1 /$7.00— 3/$1 8.00—1 0/$55.00
T 00/$450.00— 1 000/$4,000.00
>* - >"Vx v ;
THE ''HOLOCAUST" - FACTOR FICTION?
Were six million Jews really gassed-or has a colossal hoax
been perpetrated on the world?
Professor Arthur Butz has carefully investigated the alleged
extermination of 6,000,000 Jews during World War II and has
written a book which thoroughly documents his startling findings.
His book strips away the cover of fraud and deceit from this
emotion-charged topic and lays bare the full and complete truth
THE HOAX OF THE 20th CENTURY, pb„ 315 pp $7.00
Order No. 8012 plus $1.00 for post. & handling
ORDER FROM:
LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS, Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA
or /
V v f .
Ta bear
&
witness
to the
tru th
w e
nCTWORH
NOTHING BUT HARD FACTS!
NO GAMES - NO FICTION!
NO I.D. REQUIRED - FREE ACCESS
Tib© IHbU-Uifii©
COMPUTER
INFORMATION
NETWORK AND
DATABASE
_©
300/1200
BAUD SERVICE
ON-LINE
24 HOURS
To be well informed, you must read Liberty Bell. Annual subscription, 12
hard-hitting, fact-packed issues $25.00. Order from Liberty Bell
Publications, Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA.
REAGAN
AND ZION
by
Jim Taylor
Foreign Correspondent
Although President Ronald Reagan cannot run for re-elec-
tion, he nevertheless gave another humiliating command per-
formance at the annual international B’nai B’rith gathering at
the Sheraton Hotel in Washington.
This convention was not just for American Jewish leaders,
but was international in scope. (As all readers know, the
universal Zionists do not consider themselves as real citizens of
any one country.) This means that Mr. Reagan was addressing a
group of world-wide adherents to the Zionist cause not just a
group of Jewish citizens in America. Despite the fact that that
spe akin g in so biased a manner to a foreign international organi-
zation is not in keeping with the traditions of the highest office
in our nation, Mr. Reagan again promised everything and every
resource that America possesses to Israel and to continue to
promote the evils of international Zionism.
As the President spoke, his unshakeable dedication to
Zionism became readily apparent as he mentioned that the
extra $2.6 billion of the recent $9.5 billion for Israel was a
direct gift, not in any way a loan. Of course, the “loan” to
Israel won’t be repaid either, so he might as well have included
the entire giveaway under the heading of donations to Israel.
The President also made mention of our great “Judeo-
Christian” nation, which drew loud applause from the assembl-
ed Zionists. Until recent years, when Mr. Reagan took office,
no one ever heard our country described as being “Judeo-
Christian.” No prior President ever went that far in describing
our nation under Zionist rule. But I can guarantee you that
from now on every U.S. President will use those same words to
describe America.
As for myself, I never even knew that the U.S. was a Judeo-
Christian nation until the present administration told me via
publicity releases that it was to be designated as such. What
December 1986
C/farQ
about all the many minor religious sects in this country other
than the Hebrews? There must be at least a hundred others.
Why leave them out? It would be a little unwieldy to have to
announce about a hundred hyphenated religious denominations
when describing this country. Another thing which bothered
me about Mr. Reagan’s penchant for describing us as a Judeo-
Christian nation is that the Judeo-part, less than two percent of
our population comes first with the Christian designation of the
majority coming last as a sort of added-on after-thought. 1 In a
few more years you may hear a leader call this simply a Judeo-
nation, which it is now if you go by power in Washington.
And I see that Mr. Reagan is still using that old, worn-out,
tear-jerker about a poor old Jew in Nicaragua named Isaac
Stavisky who was supposedly a victim of extreme “anti-Semit-
ism.” What Mr. Reagan “forgot” to mention in his speech
about Mr. Stavisky is the fact that while that poor old Jew was
undergoing the “hardships” of “anti-Semitism,” he also became
very wealthy, as did many other Jews in Nicaragua at the time.
The President also promoted the Zionist-backed scheme
.called the Genocide Convention, which he stated the U.S.
finally ratified. There was nothing in his talk about benefiting
Americans, just a guarantee of all-out assistance to Zionism.
As I read Mr. Reagan’s speech, so full of undiluted praise for
the Zionists, I was made to wonder if he is a bom masochist,
who enjoys taking a beating so often from his supposed “friends.”
I would like to remind Mr. Reagan that despite the fact that he
loves the Zionists like a brother, this feeling is not reciprocated
at all. They simply use him. They did not vote for him, preferr-
1 . [Reagan could pretend that he was using ‘Judaeo-Christian’ in the sense
in which it recently came into use among clergymen who abandoned the i
Western Christianity that was for so long traditional among our people.
Christianity, of course, is the poisonous superstition that the Jews foisted
on ignorant and gullible Aryans with the help of White crackpots and
swindlers. To, make the fictions of the “New Testament” acceptable to
non-Jews, however, they had to season it with some adverse criticism of
themselves, and so the Christian cult, further modified for propagation to
Europeans, conformed to the instinctively anti-Jewish sentiments of our
race until the 1920s, when the tales in the appendix to the Jew-Book
could no longer be believed outside a nursery, and ambitious clergymen
started to promote instead a “social gospel” that was a reversion to the
primitive Jewish Bolshevism that figures largely in the “New Testament.”
They elected to call this reversal of Western Christianity ‘Judaeo-Christian,’
as indeed it was, thus also currying favor with the Jews, There are reports
that the broken-down old actor in the White House is so ignorant he
believes that hokum.— Editor]
26
Liberty Bell
ing a man named Walter Mondale in the last election. And these
same people he holds in such high esteem not only dislike him,
but make speeches against him all across the country .
All those billions of dollars for Israel, which Mr. Reagan is
bragging about, are not his to give away. It is not government
money. It does not grow on the cherry trees in Washington.
Before the President can give these billions to the Zionists, he
must first extract this money from your pockets. And by doing
so against the will of the majority of Americans, he has proven
that he has no honor, no integrity, no courage, and no respect
for America.
And when Mr. Reagan and Congress opened up the U.S.
Treasury and made it a grab-bag for the Israelis to reward them
for committing genocide against the Palestinian people and
other heinous crimes in Lebanon, it amounted to nothing short
of treason.
But I think all Americans should read for themselves Mr.
Reagan’s entire speech. It is a bit long. But the people of this
country are never going to read it in any other publication.
You aren’t supposed to even know about it.
The address is radical, even sickening to average Americans.
So I would not advise anyone with high-blood pressure to read
it. I have a White House copy. Here it is in its entirety :
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
REMARKS OF THE PRESIDENT
TO THE B’NAI B’RITH INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION
11:33 A.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Max Fisher, if I’d be really
smart, I’d just sit down and leave your introduction do it and I
wouldn’t speak. I thank you very much, as a long-time friend.
And I thank all of you. It’s a deep honor for me to speak to
you, the members of one of the oldest and largest Jewish
organizations in America. For more than 140 years, B nai
B’rith has sponsored religious, cultural and civic programs,
conducted studies of vital issues, combatted bigotry and worked
December 1986 ^
tirelessly to advance the cause of tolerance and humanity. And
because of your efforts, today our country has a bigger heart, a
deeper sense of the generosity of spirit that must always define
America. And on behalf of all Americans, I thank you. (Ap-
plause.)
Four years ago, as aprivate citizen, I argued that the strength
and well-being of the United States and Israel are bound inextric-
ably together. “No policy,” I asserted, “no matter how heart-
felt, no matter how deeply rooted in the humanitarian vision we
share can succeed if the United States of America continues its
descent into economic impotence and despair.”
Well, today, as President, I come before you to report on
the progress that we’ve made together during these past four
years. Once again, I want to talk about American policy toward
Israel— today’s new policy of deepened friendship and strength-
ened support. But first, permit me to share with you my view
of how working together the American people have replaced
our own nation’s descent into impotence and despair with the
rebirth of freedom, prosperity and hope. ■
Four years ago, we saw the first years of back-to-back
double -digit inflation since World War I. The prime interest rate
was rising sharply. And in December, 1980, it reached a point
not seen since the Civil War. In just four years, taxes roughly
doubled, and average monthly mortgage payments more than
doubled, and the real after-tax income of the average American
actually began to decline. It all added up to the worst econom-
ic crisis our country had faced since the great depression.
In foreign affairs, we had lost the respect of friend and foe
alike. And our will power had grown weak and soft, undermin-
ing, commitments to allies like Israel. Our leaders seemed to
have lost faith in the American people and in America’s future;
they spoke of a national “malaise.” On television, we saw the
Stars and Stripes being burned in foreign capitals. And from
Afghanistan to Grenada, the Soviets were on the march. Sel-
dom in all its proud history had the United States of America
reached such a pathetic state of apparent impotence.
Well, today, just four years later-we are seeing not humili-
ation, but well-justified pride pride in our country, our ac-
28 Liberty Bell
complishments, and ourselves. On the economic front, from
New York harbor to San Diego Bay, a vast and vigorous econom-
ic expansion is taking place. Inflation has plummeted to just 4
percent, and the prime interest rate has fallen by almost 9
points.
Productivity is up, consumer spending is up, housing starts
are up, and take-home pay is up. Our tax rate reductions have
restored incentives to the American people; and when tax
indexing goes into effect this January, they’ll get more help in
the form of long-overdue protection against the unfairness of
bracket creep. (Applause.)
The best news of all— during the past 19 months, six and a
half million men and women have found jobs that we’ve created.
On an average, each month, more jobs than all the Common
Market countries created in the last ten years. Europe is calling
our success the American miracle.
Well, as we’ve worked to promote economic growth, we’ve
made certain that the safety net for the truly needy has remain-
ed in place. Indeed, after correcting for inflation, under our
adminstration, average food stamp payments, medicare pay-
ments, medicaid payments, have all risen. We can and are
promoting economic vitality while showing the disadvantaged
genuine compassion.
On civil rights, we have enforced the law with new deter-
mination. The Justice Department, since we took office, has
filed more criminal charges on civil rights violations, brought
more violators to trial, and achieved more civil rights con-
victions than ever before. So, let no one doubt our commitment.
As President, I will enforce civil rights to the fullest extend of
the law. (Applause.)
i
Yet, at the same time, we remain unalterably opposed to an
idea that would undermine the very concept of equality itself—*
discriminatory quotas. Ours is a nation based on the sacredness
of the individual, a nation where all women and men must be
judged on their own merit, imagination and effort— not on what
they are, but what they do. Now, you know, I can remember a
time— I’m old enough to remember a time— when America did
have quotas, and they were used in attempt to make discrimina-
Decem her 1 986 29
i
tion legitimate and permanent, keeping Jews and other targets
of bigotry out of colleges, medical schools and jobs. And I i
can’t state it too forcefully: this type of thing must never
happen again. (Applause.) ‘
I
►
To combat crime, our administration has increased the law 1
enforcement budget by more than twenty percent, established
12 regional drug task forces around the country, and hired more
than 1,900 new investigators and prosecutors. We’ve also
reasserted some basic values— values that say there is such a
thing as right and wrong; that the innocent victim is entitled to
as much protection under the law as the accused; that individual [
actions do matter, and, that yes, for hardened criminals preying
on our society, punishment must be certain and swift. (
And now that we’re getting back to these fundamentals of
our Judeo-Christian tradition, the will of the people is at last
being done. In 1982, reported crime dropped 3 percent— the
first decline since 1977. And last year, reported crime dropped
7 percent— and this is the first time the serious crime index has
ever shown a drop for the second year in a row, and the sharp-
est decline in crime statistics since 1960.
In the Armed Forces, our troops have newer and better
equipment, and their morale has soared as we begun to give
them the pay, the training and the respect they’ve always
deserved. And in foreign affairs, our country is being respected
again throughout the world as a leader for peace and freedom.
We’ve strengthened our relations with Asian allies like Korea
and Japan", deepened our friendship with China. In Europe, we
and our NATO allies went through months of Soviet attempts
to divide us and emerged more firmly united than ever. And in
Central America, we’re supporting the free nations of the region
against the threat posed to them by the Sandanista regime in
Nicaragua. In July of 1983, it was my privilege to meet a brave
refugee from Nicaragua, Isaac Stavisky, He told me about 50
Jewish families who had emigrated to Nicaragua from Eastern
Europe since the 1920’s, and about the tragedy that befell
them. But let me read you Isaac’s own words: Nicaraguan Jews
never encountered anti-Semitism until the Sandanistas started
their revolution. Graffiti by Sandanistas was widespread,
with attacks on Jews and their religion. One was, “Death to the
Jewish pigs.” In 1978, the Sandanistas sent a strong message to
the entire community when the synagogue was attacked by five
30 Liberty Bell
Sandanistas wearing face handkerchiefs. They set the building
on fire by throwing gasoline in the main entrance doors, shout-
ing P.L.O. victory slogans and anti-Jewish defamatory language.
Once the Sandanistas came to power, they moved swiftly
against Jews. Jewish -owned properties were among the first to
be confiscated and Jews were forced into exile.
i
Permit me to add that on the first anniversary of the Sanda-
nista revolution, Yasser Arafat visited Nicaragua and spoke
these words, “What the Nicaraguan people' did in Nicaragua will
be done by the Palestinians.”
Well, today, some in our national life would have America
take a position of weakness in Central America, or, through
callous indifference, withdraw from that region altogether.
These politicians, would give free reign to Marxist-Leninists who
would persecute Central American Catholics and Jews, leaving
them defenseless against Sandanista intolerance.
We stand four-square on the side of human liberty. And I
pledge to you that we will maintain that stand as long as I am in
this office. (Applause.)
Anyone who has contemplated the horror inflicted on Jews
during World War II, the deaths of millions in Cambodia or the
travail of the Mesquito Indians in Nicaragua must understand
that if free men and women remain silent in the face of oppres-
sion, we risk the destruction of entire people, (Applause.) I
know that B’nai B’rith has been among the most concerned of
the groups advocating American support for the Genocide
Convention. With a cautious view, in part due to the human .
rights abuses performed by some nations that have already
ratified the documents, our administration has conducted a long
and exhaustive study of the Convention. And yesterday, as a
result of that review, we announced that we will vigorously
support, consistent with the United States Constitution, the
ratification of the Genocide Convention. (Applause.) And I
want you to know that we intend to use the Convention in our
efforts to expand human freedom and fight human rights
abuses around the world. (Applause.) Like you, I say in a
forthright voice , ‘ ‘N ever again ! ” (Applause .)
Now there’s is one final aspect of our national renewal that I
must mention: the return that millions of Americans are making
to faith-faith as a source of strength, comfort and meaning,
December 1 986 31
This new spiritual awareness extends to people of all
religions and all beliefs. Irving Kristol has written, “the quest
for a religious identity is, in the postwar world, a general
phenomenon, experienced by Jews, Christians, and Muslims
alik e. It does not seem, moreover, to be a passing phenomenon,
but rather, derives from an authentic crisis— a moral and spiritual
crisis as well as. a crisis in Western, liberal-secular thought.”
: i n our country, Kristol asserts, “Ever since the Holocaust
. and the emergence of the state of Israel, American Jews have
been reaching toward a more explicit and meaningful Jewish
■identity.” . And . according to Rabbi Seymour Siegel of the
Jewish Theological Seminary, this trend among American Jews
is illustrated by a growing interest in Jewish history and the
Hebrew language and by the rise of— and I hope I get this
■right-EBaal Heshuva Movement— a powerful movement of Jews,
yo.ung::and old, Orthodox, Conservative and Reformed, return-
ing to the ancient ways of the faith.
As Americans of different religions find new meaningfulness
in their beliefs we do sb together— returning to the bedrock
values of family, hard work, and faith in the same loving and
almighty God.
And as we' welcome this rebirth of.faith, we must even more
fervently .. attack ugly , intolerance. We have no place for haters
in America. (Applause.)
Well, let .me— let me speak plainly. The United States of
America is,: and must' remain a nation of openness to people of
all beliefs. Qur very unity has been strengthened by this plural-
ism. That’s how we began. This is how we must always be.
The ideals of our country leave no room whatsoever for in-
tolerance, anti-Semitism, or bigotry of . any kind— none. The
unique thing about America is a wall in our Constitution,
separating Church and State. It guarantees there will never be a
state religion in this land, but at the same time it makes sure
that every single American is free to choose and practice his or
her religious beliefs or to choose no religion at all. Their rights
shall not be questioned or violated by the state.
And during the dark days of World War II, legend has it an
event took place that I believe is a timeless symbol of regard for
32 Liberty Bell
our fellow men that true tolerance and brotherhood demand.
Soon after the Nazis invaded De nm ark in 1940, they published
an edict that all Jews identify themselves by wearing an arm-
band showing the Star of David. Well, the next day, the
Christian King of Denmark appeared in public. He was wearing
a Star of , David. (Applause.) He was— I have been told— (Ap-
plause.) I was told, on my one visit to Denmark there, that
after he had done that, every citizen of Denmark, from then on,
appeared in the streets wearing the Star of David.
We in America have learned the lesson of the Holocaust, and
we shall never allow it to be forgotten. Oppression will never
extinguish the instinct of good people to do the right thing.
i
In America, Jew, Christian, Muslim, believers of all kinds,
and non-believers,’ too*— as George Washington wrote to a Jewish
congregation in Rhode Island-each “shall sit in safety under his
own vine , and fig-tree, and there shall be none to make him
afraid.” (Applause.)
)
A renewal of faith and confidence, a resurgent economy, a
rebirth of strength and purposefulness in our foreign relations—
yes, we Americans have made a new beginning, just as 4 years
ago I said that we must. And this new beginning is good, not
only for us, but for our allies. And now, it is to our relations
with Israel that I would like to turn.
The first step in understanding American -Israeli relations
is to recognize our common values, aspirations, and interests.
This has fundamental consequences for our diplomacy in an
environment of widespread hostility to Israel. Nowhere does
this hostility appear more clearly than in that international
institution that should be a citadel of goodwill, but that all too
often becomes a platform for propaganda— the United Nations.
From the 1970*s on, the United Nations has too often allowed
itself to become a forum for the defamation of Israel.
In 1975, for example, the United Nations Third Committee
proposed an anti-Semitic resolution that condemned Israel as
racist. The American delegate, Leonard Garment, objected
forceably, arguing that the resolution used the word racist, not
as a term for “a very real and concrete set of injustices, but
December 1986
33
merely an epithet to be flung at whoever happens to be one’s
adversary.” Those were his words.
Nevertheless, the resolution passed, by 70 votes to 29, with
27 abstentions. The resolution then went to the United Nations
General Assembly which ratified it by a vote of 72 to 35. The
words, that our Ambassador to the United Nations, Daniel
Patrick Moynihan, spoke at that moment of shame were forth-
right .and courageous. “The United States rises to declare
before the world that it does not acknowledge, it will not abide
by , and it will never acquiesce in this infamous act.” (Applause.)
Well, sadly, in the years thereafter, the United States did
not always give Israel such steadfast support. American policy
toward Israel was often weak and muddled. It reached a low
point on March 1, 1980. That day, the American delegate to
the United Nations actually voted in favor of a resolution that
repeatedly condemned Israel. Some 48 hours later, President
Carter disavowed the vote, and announced to the press that it
had all been a mistake-a bad mistake. And it certainly had.
Well, since taking office our administration has used every
effort to reaffirm before the world our unwavering support for
the State of Israel. And in the United Nations, our stand has
been made unmistakeable by our Ambassador and your good
friend, Jeane Kirkpatrick. (Applause.) Just three weeks ago at
the United Nations Population Conference in Mexico City , we
joined Israel in opposing and voting against a resolution that
attacked the State of Israel. And let me make it plain to the
friends and enemies of Israel alike, that what Max Fisher just
told you is absolutely true and still the policy of this govern-
ment, and that if ever expelled, yes, Max, and all of you, we
walk out together with Israel. (Applause.) In concrete terms, ;
our adminis tration has strengthened the American-Israeli
alliance in three crucial ways.
First, we have upgraded and formalized our strategic
cooperation. For the first time in history , under our administra- .
tion, the United States and Israel have agreed on a formal
strategic relationship, the American-Israeli Joint Political-Mili-
tary Group has already begun regular meetings. Together, we’re I
developing plans for joint efforts to encounter the Soviet ^
threat to our mutual interests in the Middle East. :
Liberty Bell
Recently, we renewed an American-Israeli Memorandum of
Agreement that provides for cooperation on military research
and development, procurement and logistics. Under the terms
of the agreement, the United States has already purchased
Israel-manufactured radios, remotely -piloted vehicles, anti-tank
weapons and components for sophisticated aircraft. We, in turn,
are making available the latest technology for the development
of the Israeli-designed LAVI fighter aircraft— (Applause)— and
for a new class of missile attack boat, the- SAAR 5. (Applause.)
Second, we’ve markedly increased our economic assistance
to Israel. From 1981 to 1984, we provided Israel with aid
amounting to nearly $9.5 billion, more than has been provided
by any previous administration over a comparable time . Just as
important, we have restructed the form of our assistance.
Indeed, in 1985.,. our entire $2.6 billion in aid to Israel will take
the form not of loans, but of grants. (Applause.)
i
And, third, we have begun formal negotiations with Israel
for a free trade area agreement. When signed and ratified, this
agreement will allow the duty-free entry of Israeli products into
the United States, and will at the same time completely open
the Israeli market to American goods. (Applause.) Over the
past five years, our trade with Israel has been growing at an
average annual rate of some 10%. This free trade agreement will
enable that vital economic partnership to grow even more
quickly in years to come .
These measures have made our relation with Israel closer,
and our friendship stronger, than at any time in the history of
our two nations. Indeed, Prime Minister Shamir recently
described American-Israeli relations as having never been better.
(Applause.) And that warm relationship is crucial as we strive
together for peace in the Middle East. So let me outline our
work in this regard. ,
America’s peace efforts still stand on the foundation of the
Camp David Accords. Those accords, which established peace-
ful relations between Israel and Egypt, led to the return of the
Sinai to Egypt by Israel in April of 1982— and the United States
was proud to play a central role in achieving this step of the
Camp David process. Then on September 1 of 1982, 1 set forth
a set of fair and balanced positions on the key issues— issues
December 1 986 35
34
which the negotiating parties must deal with to achieve a lasting
peace. The positions I outlined included our firm opposition to
the formation of any independent Palestinian state. Today ,
those positions remain fully valid, and they represent the
foundation of our continuing labors .
And let me assure you, we will never attempt to impose a
solution on Israel, nor will we— (Applause)— nor will we ever
weaken in our opposition to terrorism by the PLO or by any-
body else. (Applause.) As I said when I addressed you in 1980,
terrorists are not guerillas, or commandos, or freedom fighters
or anything else. They’re terrorists, and should be identified as
such . (Applause .) We will go on working with all our hearts to
help the people of the Middle East achieve a just and lasting
settlement— a settlement that agrees, in the words of my state-
ment of September 1982, that Israel “has a right to exist in
peace behind secure and defensible borders, and it has a right to
expect its neighbors to recognize this.” (Applause.)
When I spoke to you 4 years ago, peace was eluding the
Middle East. It still does! But now we and the state of Israel
have fax greater cause for hope.
Today, the United States is rebuilding its defenses, and that
is restoring confidence in our leadership and making the parties
more willing to take risks for peace. Today, the United States
re-energized its vast and productive economy, and that will help
to make Israel more prosperous. And today, the United States
has stopped wringing its hands apologetically and once again
begun to play its rightful role in the world-with faith, confi-
dence and courage. And that means Israel can depend on us.
(Applause.) .
We who are friends of Israel may differ over tactics. But
our goal remains always unchanged— permanent security for the
people of that brave state. In this great enterprise, the United
States and Israel stand forever united.
And as we approach the Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashanah,
let us pray that the new year wiil be a Shanah Umetukah (Ap-
plause) — a good and sweet year for both America and Israel.
For make no mistake — in a world where so many are hostile
to freedom, where millions live in poverty and oppression, those
few nations who share the light of liberty must stand together.
If we do not, we take the awful chance that the darkness will
gQ Liberty Bell
overwhelm us one by one. But standing together, we can pierce
the darkness and shed our light over all the earth.
Thank you. God bless you all. (Applause.)
END 12:00 P.M. EDT
* * *
'\
On the day President Reagan ordered the U.S. Sixth Fleet
to attack Libya, I got calls from ABC radio news and from the
ABC outlet in Phoenix, KFYI 910. They wanted me to be at
radio station KFYI early the next morning to talk about Libya
and Colonel Muammar al-Qaddafi. I was also asked to answer
questions from listeners for two hours.
My appearance on this radio station was publicized and
promoted right up to air time ; so a very large listening audience
was assured, since such a timely topic was to be discussed just as
the confrontation in the Gulf of Sidra took place. And I was
the only scheduled guest.
Let me say at once that the radio executives who made it
possible for me to have two hours of air time for my views must
have considered me to be knowledgeable about both Libya and
Colonel Qaddafi. However, I seriously doubt that they antici-
pated that I would deliver a blistering attack on the infantile
U.S. policy of carrying out Israeli orders to bash Libya in direct
violation of international law and under the most shallow
of disguises, such as the one about holding U.S. Navy “training
exercises.” Or else, I would not have been invited to speak and
answer questions on this important subject.
Anyway, I arrived at the radio station about 30 minutes
before air time, as requested, to receive a minimum of in-
structions about the format of the program, which, I might add,
was still being promoted every five minutes on the air.
I spoke about conditions in Libya and let everyone listening
know the real reason for the President’s child-like actions in
attacking such a tiny nation. My main point, of course, was
that bashing Libya had nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism
of any sort. As I began to expose carefully the clever U.S.-
Zionist plans for the destruction of Libya, the host of the
program became more nervous by the minute. He was chain-
smoking in between brief announcements to the effect that the
views I was expressing were my own and certainly not those of
the station or the network. He also made it quite clear to the
audience whose side' he was on by telling them that he per-
December 1 986 37
sonaUy did not believe 90% of what I was saying. I suppose he
already had visions of what the various Jewish hate groups,
listening in to my attack on their plans, were going to say to
him for letting me on the air.
Naturally, several rabid and foaming-at-the-mouth Zionists
called in to threaten me during the show. This certainly did not
bother me in the least and it didn’t slow down my attack upon
them. I am used to it. The truth hurts. And you seldom hear
it these days with the press under such restraints, imposed by
Zionists . I think the facts I presented shocked the many Jewish
groups listening to the program. Here they thought they had
everything under control so that only their side would ever be
presented to the American public; yet here I was lambasting
them and pulling no punches whatsoever. It must have been
enough to give a few hard-working Zionists a heart attack.
They were hearing on the air exactly what their organizations
are dedicated to preventing the people of the United States
from ever hearing. It must have made them furious. And
despite all this, I never wavered in denouncing them and the
joint Israeli-American plans in the Mideast. I suppose I will pay
for this indiscretion later if they can think of something nasty
to do to me simply because I exercised my American right of
free speech.
However, I must tell you that the greatest surprise of all, to
both myself and the host, was that a large majority of the
callers agreed totally with my viewpoints. That never happened
before on any program. I usually stand alone with a large
segment against me screaming wildly because they have no
logical arguments to use against my proven facts.
I also spoke about South Africa, the many Marxist states in
Africa, and especially about my recent clandestine visit to the
Cuban-run Communist nation of Angola. I tried to bring as
much as possible to the attention of the vast listening audience,
including the fact that Ferdinand Marcos was not run out of the
Philippines because of his wealth and excesses, but only for his
strong stand against Communism and Zionism. I also predicted
that the U.S. will now assist in the downfall of South Korea for
the very same reasons. Then the U.S. will pay that small nation
to submit to Communist rule.
Near the end of this scheduled program, a man called in to
Say that he had a question for me which he would ask me next
time I was on this news analysis show. I told him that he had
better ask it now because, the host was so upset and frightened
38
of what the Zionists were going to do to him for allowing me on
the program that I would certainly never again be invited to
participate .
For quite obvious reasons, I have rarely been on the same
television or radio station twice. The Jewish hate organizations
see to that. And I usually never expect to be on the same
program twice. Once is all it takes to rile up the hateful gang of
Zionist protectors, both Jewish and non-Jewish, who control
everything in the country now. Stations and Jewish groups
learn very quickly that I am the only American journalist who
cannot be controlled, regulated, or even influenced by then-
threats and intimidation. Today, in America, I am sad to say,
speaking out against the powerful Israeli Lobby and the various
Jewish hate groups who back it up is considered to be the next
thing to treason.
A few days. after my radio broadcast, I received word from
Washington that the Israelis, instead of being happy about Mr.
Reagan’s bash of Libya for them, are furious with the President.
They say he didn’t destroy enough bases in Libya to suit them,
as he has for many years promised to do. Even the Prime
Minister of Israel emphasized the fact that no Libyan planes or
air bases were destroyed in the U.S. Navy’s raid on that small
nation.
And the gist of it is that the Israelis have warned Mr. Reagan
that they may be forced to do what he and the entire Sixth
Fleet failed to do— bomb every military base in Libya. So the
President of the United States risked world-wide denunciation
by committing illegal acts to please the Zionists and it was not
enough for them. They are crying for more Libyan blood to be
spilled. As always, they want more.
You cannot please these people. They are never satisfied.
It is like expecting them to say thanks when the American
taxpayers shell out billions for them. They never do. They just
demand (not ask) for more and more. It never ends. And if
this doesn’t expose for all to see that Israel is nothing more than
a nation of total parasites, then nothing will.
From the Egyptian government, I have received some
information which I am sure the White House doesn’t want
readers of this column or any other Americans to know about.
It concerns secret pressures and threats by the U.S. government
against Egypt, if that nation does not see fit to obey Zionist
wishes and attack Libya.
You see, both American officials and the canny little
Decern her 1986 39
blighters who run Israel have agreed that it would be much
better for them if Egypt, with a large standing axmy, would
invade and destroy Libya. That way, both the U.S. and Israel
could sit back and lie about it, pretending that neither of these
two Zionist nations had anything to do with it. It would seem
to the rest of the world to be merely an Arab problem and an
Arab war. Thus, the U.S. and Israel could avoid world opinion
and censure by the U.N. for starting a war in North Africa just
to bring down the hated Qaddafi government.
But the plan didn’t work, according to Egyptian officials.
The government of Egypt has released information stating that
the U.S. has three times recently attempted to force Egypt to
attack Libya. Mr. Reagan has even. threatened to cut foreign aid
to Egypt if that country does not do the bidding of the Zionists
by attacking Libya.
You have heard many times the age-old expression of let s
you and him fight.” Well, that is exactly what the U.S. is trying
to put over on Egypt. In essence, President Reagan told Egyp-
tian President Hosni Mubarak to start military action against
Libya— or else. Mr. Reagan stressed the fact that the U.S. has
furnished arms to Egypt and he wants that country to show
that it knows how to use them by invading Libya.
According to President Mubarak’s chief assistant, a White
House meeting was held last July at which Robert McFarlane,
“National Security Adviser,” decided that Egypt should invade
Libya. Both the White House and the CIA approved of this
plan. But the Egyptians flatly refused to become a military arm
of world Zionism by attacking Libya.
Next Mr. Reagan sent Vice Admiral John Poindexter, USN,
to Cairo and offered President Mubarak all the military funds
and arms needed for such a thrust at Libya. This generous
offer was also turned down by the Egyptian government as
being an insane idea.
In November, according to the Egyptians, Mr. Reagan tried
a third time to force Egypt into war with Libya.
I firmly believe that the facts I have just given show exactly
what the U.S. and Israel are up to in North Africa. If Egypt
continues to refuse to participate in such an outrageous war of
aggression, then I suppose the next step will have to be a joint
U.S.-Israeli invasion of the tiny and militarily -weak, anti-Com-
munist nation of Libya.
The six -year-long campaign of sheer hatred and terror
against Libya and Colonel Muammar al-Qaddafi by the ill-ad-
40 Liberty Bell
vised United States government shifted into high gear about
four months ago when President Reagan personally injected
scare tactics into this war of nerves. But, you noticed, in all the
newspapers and television programs devoted to putting fear into
Colonel Qaddafi, Israel was never mentioned even once. This is
being done purposely. And the Zionists are keeping very quiet
about Libya. It is not mentioned at all publicly by the Israeli
Embassy in Washington.
However, the one and only reason why the U.S. is waging
war against Libya ip the first place is simply because President
Reagan made a sworn promise to Israel before he took office in
1980 that before he left the White House in 1988 he would
have murdered Colonel Qaddafi and brought down the present
government of Libya which would then become an American -
Israeli colony, as Egypt is being made today. And although Mr.
Reagan has certainly tried every way known to man to assassi-
nate the Libyan leader, he has not been successful. Colonel
Qaddafi, at this writing, is still very much alive, depite the fact
that Mr. Reagan did succeed in murdering his youngest daughter
and wounding his wife and several other children of his family.
He also destroyed the Libyan leader’s home in Tripoli. Mr.
Reagan, through the CIA, also paid over five million dollars of
the taxpayers money to a gang of Israeli-trained terrorists and
common criminals who were sent into Libya three times for the
►
express purpose of killing Colonel Qaddafi, All this, depite U.S.
laws which strictly prohibit such action by the United Stats
government or any agency thereof, Mr. Reagan then tried to
foment a revolution inside Libya to overthrow Colonel Qaddafi.
Again Israeli-trained agents were dispatched to Tripoli, This,
too, ended in total failure. And that’s why Mr. Reagan was
driven to use force, in the form of the armed might of the
United States, to blast Libya. Nothing else had worked and the
Israelis were getting more and more impatient, day by day.
They want those promises kept and time is running out for a
lame -duck president.
Last August, a delegation of Israelis and their American
Jewish stooges paid Mr. Reagan another visit and demanded for
about the onethousandth- time that Mr. Reagan destroy Libya,
their chief enemy in the Arab world. And the Zionists didn’t
mean just dropping a few bombs on that small North African
nation. They want Libya destroyed totally, blown up and done
with forever. And they are furious with Mr. Reagan for taking
six years to do so little against Colonel Qaddafi. They term it a
December 1 986 41
simple operation and do not understand why Mr. Reagan
cannot carry it out quickly.
And this is exactly why hapless little Libya is again facing
destruction at the hands of American military might. It hasn’t
got the slightest thing to do with terrorism. That’s a very
shallow dodge , implemented solely as a disguised ploy to get the
support of the American public for making Libya a disaster area
resembling the city of Dresden in Germany at the end of
hostilities during World War II.
For a while, the U.S. government put out statements on the
hour, every hour, such as “We have hard evidence that Qaddafi
is planning terrorist attacks in Europe;” ‘ ‘Colonel Qaddafi’s
fingerprints are all over plans for .new terrorist missions;” and
“Terrorist plans show the imprint of Libya.”
All such statements are just that, merely statements, not
proof. In fact, to be accurate, those fancy but meaningless
statements from the White House are in reality just plain lies
with no basis at all, in truth. When some over-paid and under-
thinking W 7 hite House or State Department spokesman stands
up and says that Qaddafi’. s fingerprints are all over some imagi-
nary terrorist plan, those axe just words. They are not evidence.
No court on earth would listen to such unmitigated hearsay
nonsense . Too many Americans think that because someone at
the White House issues some wild and unfounded statements
about Libya, it must be true.
During the past six years of Mr. Reagan’s terms of office, he
has had every agency of the United States government world-
wide trying to dig up evidence that Colonel Qaddafi arranges
acts of terrorism. Yet in all that time, not one iota of proof has
been found that ties Libya to any sort of terrorism whatsoever.
Now it seems logical to me that if Colonel Qaddafi really were
engaged in such activities, as Mr. Reagan claims, then surely the
combined efforts of the FBI, the CIA, the National Security
Agency and the many other investigative bodies assigned to “get
Qaddafi evidence” would have turned up some proof by now.
In their hurry to claim that Qaddafi’s hit squads were
closing in fast on the White House in 1981 to kill the President,
the U.S. accepted a pack of lies and manufactured “evidence”
given to the State Department by the Israeli Embassy, consist-
ing of photos of 14 Arabs called terrorists by MOSS AD, But
the FBI quickly demolished this theory by releasing informa-
tion that these Shi’ite Arabs, who were supposed to be working
for Qaddafi, were actually very much against the Libyan leader
42 Liberty Bell
and had made attempts to assassinate him, not the president of
the United States. This proved to be a great embarrassment to
the Israelis and their U.S. government stooges in the State
Department. And, even now, when I speak with European
diplomats, they still joke about the fake hit squads of 1981,
This kind of stuff makes the U.S. government look very foolish,
which it is.
As everyone knows, the Israelis asked both President Ford
and Pesident Carter to close the Libyan Embassy in Washington.
Both refused on the ground that there was no reason to do so.
But this attitude changed when Mr. Reagan reached the White
House. He quickly did the bidding of the world Zionists and
booted the Libyan Embassy out of Washington on only four
days’ notice.
Even this was not enough for the extreme zealots at the
Israeli Embassy^ . They then asked Mr. Reagan to use American
influence to pressure the United Nations to kick out Libya.
And Mr. Reagan would have done so, if he had had the authori-
ty to do so. But he did the next best thing. He ordered all
Libyan diplomats at the U.N. confined to an area no more than
two miles from the United Nations building. This meant that
the Libyan ambassador could not even go to his own home in
New Jersey. He had to get an apartment in Manhattan. Later,
i '
the U.S. relented just enough to allow him to use his residence
two weekends per month. But he was not even allowed to even
enter his own home until after 5 P.M. on Friday. When he
arrived home at 4:30 P.M., he was forced to just sit idly in his
car for 30 minutes before U.S. agents would permit him to
enter his own home. How’s that for restrictions? Ambassadors
in the Soviet Union have much more freedom. And remember
that the U.N. Charter states that all members have to be treated
equally. What a joke President Reagan made of that clause !
Another form of arranged harassment of the Libyans prevent-
ed the Libyan ambassador from visiting his doctor, a New York
physician whose office was more than two miles from the U.N.
Does this sound like America, the land of the free, to you? As
Mr. Mahmoud B. Sokni, Libyan press attache at the time told
me, “It is like throwing rocks at the Statue of Liberty.”
The most recent phase of this bash-Libya and Scare-Libya
business began when one of the most vicious of all the Israeli
war criminals arrived in the United States on August 2 to
become 'military attache at the Israeli Embassy in Washington.
Major General Amos Yaron has been found guilty several times
December 1986 43
at the world court for such matters in Geneva because he has
repeatedly violated Article 147 of the Fourth Geneva Conven-
tion. Next to General Ariel Sharon, the “Butcher of Beirut/ 5
iGeneral Xaron is the most wanted war criminal by the Arab
mationa, This killer is the one whom General Sharon put in
:charge bf the Sabra and Shatilamassacres in Lebanon during the
3£98'2 invasion. And it was he who allowed “protected per-
sons/ 5 unde^^^ ;in writing from the United States
government., rto be slaughtered that fateful day when Israeli
^officers :put :on Lebanese “Christian 5 5 militia uniforms to super-
vise "this :mass 'killing :bf old men, women and children. It was
done "to break dta morale of the hard-pressed Palestinians, who
■were ?then engaged in a desperate struggle against superior Ameri-
cambacked .Israelis around Beirut.
Several Arab-American organizations have protested the
.admission .into The U.S* of this depraved war criminal. “We
have a vital responsibility to bring ICaron’s •bloodstained cre-
dentials to the American public’s attention, 55 -said Mr. Joseph
Najjar, coordinator of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination
Committee.
In an attempt to prevent GeneraTYaron from being admitted
to the United States, Mr. Najjar told the State Department,
“Human decency demands that our government have nothing to
with a foreign representative whose own government stripped
him of his field command for his involvement in the Sabra and
Shatila massacres. 55
But, as always, Mr. Reagan and the State Department
allowed this wax .criminal to be admitted to our country, and
with full diplomatic immunity, too. Right after his arrival, the
Israeli Embassy secretly released to one of the most undesirable
yellow journalists in the country, Mr. Norman Pearlstine,
managing editor of 'the . Zionist-controlled Wall Street Journal, a
completely fabricated story that the Libyans were planning to
blow up U.S. bases in Europe. And, of course, the White House
staff, ever anxious to further ingratiate themselves with the
Zionists, echoed whatever absurd rumors Mr. Pearlstine printed
in the Journal
This nasty turn of events ‘went on for over two months
before our European allies demanded some form of proof that
Libya was planning such actions in their respective countries.
They notified Washington that their own intelligence services
had been unable to verify any of the patent nonsense put out
by the Israeli Embassy through their man at the Wall Street
44
Liberty Bell
Journal Then, when Washington failed to supply them with
any evidence, manufactured or otherwise, the European diplo-
mats threatened to bring this matter before the United Nations
if Mr. Reagan did not recant some of this warmongering talk he
gave out to the press just to back up what the Israelis had done
and to again incense the American public against little Libya.
Then the Knight-Ridder newspaper chain released a story by
James McCartney and David Hess, which stated, “Over the past
10 days, the Reagan administration has manufactured a non-
existent crisis with Libya as part of an anti-terrorism effort that
even top White House officials admitted was a complete fabrica-
tion. It began with directives from President Reagan to fire a
shot across the bow of Libyan leader Moammar Khadafy.”
When this story hit the streets across America, then Mr.
Reagan and the State Department were forced to back up and
admit there was no evidence against Libya whatsoever. But no
White House spokesman dared to tell the truth about the part
tire Israelis played in starting the entire matter with their stooge
at the Wall Street Journal , Mr. Pearlstine.
So I say, now that the White House, the CIA, the National
Security Council, and the State Department have finally ad-
mitted lying about Libya to please Israel, how are you ever
going to believe the next big lie about Qaddafi or Syria or
whatever the Zionists come with next time?
Remember that Mr. Reagan does not have a very good
record for veracity. He lied about the hit squad scare in 1981.
He lied about the Libyans 5 being behind the Berlin nightclub
bombing. He lied about Libya’s being responsible for the Rome
airport attack. He has lied about Libya for over six years now.
When are the people going to stop believing him?
As Dr. Ali Treiki, Libya’s ambassador to the U.N., whom I
know personally, told NBC, “If there is any evidence at all, why
doesn’t Mr. Reagan present it at the United Nations for all the
world to see and judge?” 5
Of course, Mr. Reagan does not dare take Dr. Treiki up on
that offer, because there is no proof and no such Libyan plans
•' ever existed.
In my next column, I will reveal letters by Libya and by the
U.S. State Department which show the illegal actions of the
American government against Libya.
And you don’t have to like Libya or Colonel Qaddafi to see
that a great injustice has been done against that small North
African country just to satisfy the greed and powerlust of Israel.
December 1 986 45
MW
"life
FOR MY LEGIONARIES
■ I
Tke Legionary Movement in Ro-
mania, commonly known as the Iron
G.u ard , — p e r h ap s the * ol de st an ti-
Communist movement in the world,
still alive — was founded by Corneliu
Z. Codreanu in 1927. For My Le-
gionaries (353 pp., pb,, $8.00), Co-
dreanu ’s stirring work, is a complete •
and authoritative account of the
ideals and principles of the Legionary
M ovement which shaped the cha-
racter of young Romanians before
WW II. Control over the communica-
tions media and the normal channels
of book distribution by our inter-
national enemies makes it impossible
to reach the broad market this
unique book deserves. We are certain
- . that the rapidly deteriorating politic-
r *#**£■<■ ^ . al conditions will preclude a second
: 2- edition, and F or My Legionaries will
; [ v . soon become a collector s item. This
book also provides the ‘missing
pieces’ of the drastically censored The Suicide of Europe by Prince D.
Sturdza; the identity of those who masterminded Romania’s takeover
and who are now engaged in carrying out the same program in the
U.S. will no longer be unkown to you. (“Solzhenitsyn would appear
to‘ have not the slightest inkling of who conquered HIS count-
ry! ”-B.C.)
THE ANTI-HUMANS
by D. Bacu (307 pp., hb., $8.00), describes what was done to the
young men whom Codreanu inspired, when, seven years after his
brutal murder, Romania was delivered to the Bolsheviks, They were
subjected to what is the most fully documented Paviovian ‘experiment’
on a large number of human beings. It is likely that the same tech-
niques were used on many American prisoners in Korea and Vietnam.
The Anti-Humans is a well-written document of great historical and
‘psychological importance. Reading it will be an emotional experience
you will not forget. (“A sequel to Orwell’s 1984"— R.S.H.; “A searing
expose of red bestiality!” — Dr.A.J. App).
FOR MY LEGIONARIES THE ANTI-HUMANS
ORDER No. 6003 ORDER No. 1013
$8.00, single copy $7.00,3 for $15.00
plus 10% for postage and handling
No Anti-Communist library should be without these two companion
books! Order your copies from: Liberty Bell Publications, Box 21,
Reedy, WV 25270 today. Please include 10% for postage andhandling.
THE NORDIC PRESS
HITLER HAD IT EASY!
Hitler had it easy! That’s right, Hitler had an easy job of
uniting' his Aryan comrades in Germany if compared to the
problems co nfr onting today’s racialists. Hitler lived in an Aryan
community in an Aryan nation. Hitler’s contemporaries knew
they were Aryans. Hitler’s followers were sick of the treachery
and debauchery of their leaders. Hitler’s followers were able to
see the gleaming future which National Socialism offered the
Aryan peoples.
Few today live in an Aryan community. Our country is
filled with the world’s “wretched refuse.’’ Since the end of
World War II our schools have preached the Jew doctrine of
democracy and equality. From kindergarten (my, does that
German word still survive?) through the university, our young
are taught race is a myth and it is only the environment which
shapes the individual. The genetic inheritance our Aryan
ancestors passed to each of us counts for nothing— only environ-
ment determines our destiny. Therefore, the downbreeding of
the Aryan with the mud races of the world is of no consequence,
in fact it is desirable, our children learn, for all artificial barriers
created by race will be eliminated and we will be one happy
band of downbreeds wallowing in the mud of “equality .”
Those who march today under the symbolic banners of the
Siegrunen and the Hakenkreuz find it difficult, often impossible,,
to awaken fellow Aryans to the racial issues confronting them.
Germans of the Hitler era knew the facts of genetic life. They
were aware of the disruptive influences caused by the incursion
of the Jew. The Jew was correctly identified as an alien.
Despite the time of residency in Germany, for a few years
or generations, the Jew remained a Jew. There was no confusion
as to the genetic pools, one was Aryan, one was foreign.
In Germany of the Hitler era there were pockets of degener-
acy which would match anything in contemporary society. The
faggots of Berlin were as brazen as their degenerate fellows
mincing the streets of America today . The moral degeneracy of
the Weimar politicians was equaled, if not surpassed, by the
cesspool called Washington and reflected in the fifty state
December 1986 47
capitals. The major difference was the queer and the degenerate
government sickened the vast majority of the German population.
Today, from every direction, the queer, the doper, the corrupt
politician become the norm. The materialism of our contem-
porary world leaves everything to a “me-too-ism” which permits
any activity, no matter how corrupt or depraved, as long as it
pushes the individual upanotch or two in the consumer society.
To 'Hitler, honor and loyalty were important, the concepts of
the spiritual values of our ancient Aryan peoples remained.
Find them in today’s world!
Hitler and his followers had a vision of a world returned to
the concepts of Aryan purity. Of Aryans working within an
Aryan community, for the advancement of Aryan values— fami-
ly, individual honor, genetic purity and folk before self. The
National Socialists of today must show these values by their
personal life and conduct in this land of foreign occupation, for
the majority of Aryans today are so lacking in racial spirit it is
difficult for them to combat the corrupting influences of the
gutter values of a Jew dominated society.
Despite the differences, Hitler’s battle was monumental.
National Socialism was elected to political power following his
years of struggle and sacrifice. Hitler’s first attempt at political
power ended in failure before the Feldherrnhalle in Munich on
the 9th of November in 1923. It was only by the hand of
providence Hitler’s name was not amongst the sixteen who died
in the abortive putsch. From Landsberg prison Hitler then
wrote Mein Kampf in which he described his political philoso-
phy and his determination to attain his political goals. The
domination of the Hitler will was to be reflected in the monu-
mental film “Triumph des Willens” produced by Leni Riefen-
stahl in 1934 to show what was indeed the triumph of the will
of one man who had emerged to lead the Aryan peoples— Adolf
Hitler.
Despite the adversities of the contemporary Aryan world,
there is no shrinking from the task. Hitler’s ideals are more
valid today, for we see National Socialism as the sole means of
survival for our Aryan folk and culture. When our Aryan
people regain their self-respect and identity as a people unique
in culture and genetic potential, then, once again, a leader will
emerge to bring us to victory through Aryan unity. Each
National Socialist must continue the struggle and lead by
example in a world of increasing darkness. The light of those
lives will draw other Aryans to the warmth of the Aryan hearth
48 Liberty Bell
and to the growing family of Aryans gathered there.
Raise the fallen banner, march to victory under the Haken-
kreuz of old. The Siegrunen, the sign of victory and Aryan
purity, shines from the hearts of our Aryan comrades leading us
from darkness into light. Each one must act today or the Aryan
tomorrow will never come.
«£» ti« ili ili
»t»
y AIDS IS A QUEER DISEASE
A Sure, you’ve read it, or heard it on the radio or saw it
presented on television. AIDS is now a heterosexual disease. It
V v
• is no longer to be considered as an affliction of the male sodo-
• mites and intravenous drug users. It just might show up in the
sexually active young people at your high school, or work, or
bar, or etc., etc., etc. But, don’t you believe it. It is more of
the propaganda disseminated by the liberals in a rapidly failing
effort to salvage the precious “rights” of the sodomites to infect
the general population.
A national publication and a TV-network anchorman were
blabbing the liberal line in September. The pitch was the
disease is “apparently” spreading through the heterosexual
population by normal intercourse. The readers and listeners
were then led down the garden path to believe AIDS is now
spread in the same manner as the more common venereal
diseases such as gonorrhea, herpes, or syphilis. Therefore, since
it is a disease just about anyone who risks sex with more than
one partner can have— male or female— then it can not be
condemned as a “moral” failing of sodomites or those jabbing
needles into their bodies to satisfy their craving for drugs. The
“civil rights” of the sodomites come before the nation’s health.
We may all rejoice that AIDS is to be shared equally in this
grand era of the great democracies. The problem with all of this
is that it simply is not true.
The United States Government operates what is called a
Center for Infectious Diseases, a part of which is the Centers for
Disease Control in Atlanta. The word “Centers” is a plural
because more than one disease is studied there, AIDS being just
one of them. They issue weekly statistics tracking the increase
of AIDS in the United States. On 1 September 1986, the AIDS
statistical identification showed 72.2 percent of all AIDS cases
reported were in homosexual/bisexual men. Next were the
Decern ber 1 986 4 9
intravenous drug users with 16.9 percent of the cases, 5.3
percent from unknown causes and 1 .7 percent of the total were
“believed” caused by heterosexual contact. The “believed”
cases assigned to heterosexual contact places them on just a bit
firmer ground than the larger number listed as being from
“unknown” causes. The tragic groups are located in an ad-
ditional 1 .7 percent who got the virus through blood transfusions,
compliments of our medical community, and the 1.4 percent
who are children.
A network evening news anchor said on September 2nd
and 3rd that the CDC listed 900 women as having acquired
AIDS through heterosexual contact, which is amazing! The
CDC’s statistics of September 1st list only 339 women known
to be infected with AIDS through contact with a person either
with AIDS or at risk for AIDS. Apparently, in the United
States, from the CDC statistics released on September 1st until
the network television program on the 2nd, an additional 561
women were diagnosed with AIDS! Unless it had been heard
elsewhere, one would assume the figures on national TV were
grossly in error, for certainly no one would deliberately paint
such a distorted picture for the American viewers. But then,
AIDS is a queer disease!
Total active AIDS cases for males in the U.S. as of 1 Sep-
tember were 22,639; for women, 1,791, and these figures
represent all causes of infection. Since AIDS statistics were first
kept in 1979, there have been a total of 24,430 cases of AIDS
reported, and 13,442 deaths, or, 55% of those who have AIDS
have died. As there is no known cure, the fatalities will even-
tually near 100%.
No, AIDS is not primarily a heterosexual disease. It is a
disease brought into our society by the abnormal practices of
the sodomites whose anal intercourse provides an entry for the
virus into the recipient’s body. As long as we permit the
sodomite to continue to defy nature they will continue to
infect others and to spread the fatal disease. Regardless of
your moral viewpoint concerning sodomites, nature finds anal
intercourse between males contrary to the regulatory practices
established for sexual procreation and those violating the
natural law are now paying with their lives. All “life styles” are
not equal in the eyes of nature any more than are all men,
women or races equal. Nature does not recognize any equality
other than the equal right of the strong to prevail and the weak
to perish.
50 Liberty Bell
A
■ X
• x'
Of course, you, as a racially aware member of our Aryan
race, recognize the propaganda for what it is— an attempt to
further destroy our national and racial fabric by allowing the
degenerates to further infect us. AIDS can not be cured as of
this time, but its spread could be greatly reduced by quarantining
those who carry the virus. Some now suspect there may be
other means of the ,, ixus spreading beyond those mentioned,
insects, perhaps, though this has yet to be proven, what ever the
reason for the “unknown” cases, they can be controlled by
controlling the movement of the sodomites. They should not be
permitted in any Aryan community. The disease is not rapidly
spreading into the female population and thus becoming a
threat to them, AIDS is, and remains, a contamination spread
primarily by sodomites, 72.2 percent of the total, and by
intravenous drug users, 16.9 percent. Suspected heterosexual
contamination is represented by only 1.7 percent of the total
number of cases. Yes, AIDS is a queer disease.
4l> *1*
ffl
AIDS IS OUR ISSUE!
PURITY OF THE BLOOD PROTECTS FROM AIDS
The emerging catastrophe of the AIDS plague looms larger
on the front pages of newspapers each day. As the full impact
of what lies ahead begins to sink into the thickened skulls of
System-supporters, new ways to exploit the disaster begin to be
heard from America’s pulpits and legislatures. But racialist
Aryan-warriors MUST NOT let this issue become the property
of federal charlatans and system-conservatives. The unified cry
from Aryan racialists must become “AIDS IS OUR ISSUE!”
Recent system news stories indicate a growing interest by
if “conservatives” seeking to exploit AIDS hysteria for political
gain. Howard Moye, a Republican challenger from North
Carolina seeking a seat in the House of Representatives, is using
. radio advertising to exploit AIDS fears in his push for a seat in
. the House. Some “conservative” groups are using AIDS fears to
: push for opposition to legislation which would prohibit discri-
mination against AIDS patients. Such activities are likely to
have an effect and find great sympathies among Americans
fearful of the killer AIDS virus. They will probably even find
sympathy among Aryan racialist warriors. But such sympathies
rob the Aryan racialist movement of its greatest potential
Decern ber 1 986 51
political issue ever!
While System-conservatives and pseudo^Jew bible thumpers
prophesy about the threat to “family,” they offer no true
solution to a social order which seeks to solve symptoms and
not* causes. The cause of the AIDS crisis is not sexual predis-
position.or even homosexual excesses. It is, simply stated, the
direct: result of the willful negligence of Purity of the Blood.
*
While Christian conservatives are preaching out one side of their
mouths about the evils of the “killer virus/’ they turn and offer
i
their solution: stricter adherence to the Judaic value system
that brought us to this place in time. If only we study the
history of the Jews (Bible) a little more our salvation will come!
Conservative politicians on the other hand could care less
about the issue of Blood-Purity. AIDS is just another political
issue which might be the ticket to a pork-barrel position in our
nation’s capitol or a state legislature. It might just as well be a
discussion about tariffs or the three-martini lunch deduction.
System conservatives will NEVER recognize this issue for what
it is: THE END RESULT OF A WORLDVIEW WHICH STATES
THAT BLOOD-PURITY IS IRRELEVANT TO THE EXIST-
ENCE OF A NATION!
Aryan racialist warriors must pick up this issue as if it were
our fallen battle standard! AIDS IS OUR ISSUE!
The greatest 20th century Aryan racialist prophesied the
AIDS cataclysm. He came to offer a fatally corrupted world a
thousand years of life if it would only change a few of its
practices and beliefs. For delivering his message he was re-
warded with DEATPI, like so many foresighted Aryan racialists
today! But his vision is as true today as it was a half-century
ago, only that same, dying materialist worldview is now too
corrupt and rotten to be ressurrected or saved. It is up to
modem Aryan racialists to once and for all sound the death
knell for a system which rejected the only viable option offered
for its continued existence. This time, we spare no prisoners!
Adolf Hitler warned 50 years ago:
...there is only one holiest right, and this right is at the same
time the holiest obligation, to wit: to see to it that the blood is
preserved pure..” (Mein Kampf , Houghton Miflin ed., 1971,
pg.402).
He stated that the vitality of a people lies in the purity of its
blood, not merely in the discrete “genes” as mechanistic scien-
52 Liberty Bell
tific -materialists would advocate today. Scientific materialists
b. would advocate that by proper manipulation and implantation/
y transplantation any old piece of humanoid flesh could be made
s]l equal to an Aryan! Adolf Hitler said something completely
$ different and his message is only now being proved correct! No
■ v.;' matter what the liberal-materialists and their worn out world -
view may say to the < ontrary, the central issue facing society at
,*1} the close of the 20th century is the same one it so desperately
, fought against at the opening of the 20th century: THE ISSUE
i OF BLOOD PURITY!
i
Who today would seek voluntary surgery and would
accept the blood of an unknown donor without suspicion and
alarm? The perverse practice of piping Hottentot blood gathered
from street winos and drug addicts into the veins of otherwise
healthy individuals will soon be at an end. The “science” of
buying and selling organs from decapitated auto -accident
victims for the preservation of life forms purposely less endowed
•Jjsjfv by nature has seen its zenith! The insidious “scientific” practice
A of ripping still -beating hearts from the chest cavities of species
t; (baboons) which are not our enemies and which did “mankind”
} no harm is now repaid! And the one man who came to turn a
world from such ungodly (read “Un-Aryan”) practices told the
world it would be so !
He spoke of the community that WE, HIS SPIRITUAL
HEIRS , ARE TO FIGHT FOR AND BUILD . . .
“It must set race in the center of all life. It must take care to
keep it pure. It must declare the child to be the most precious
treasure of a people.” (Mein Kampf , pg. 403)
; ; “A folkish state must therefore begin by raising marriage from
the level of a continuous defilement of the race, and give it the
consecration of an institution which is called upon to produce
' T images of the Lord and not monstrosities halfway between man
'y ! and ape ” (pg. 402)
“No boy or girl must leave school without having been led to an
ultimate realization of the necessity and essence of blood
. purity.” (pg. 427)
He knew such a task would not be accomplished in five, ten
or twenty years but rather over generations...
\
“Here the state must act as the guardian of a millennial future
December 1986 53
in the face of which the wishes and selfishness of the individual
must appear as nothing...”' (pg.404)
t
of the faculty md ability to procreate on the
pa$g the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over a
of stx; hundred years, would not only free humanity
fir©® m imoneasurable misfortune, but would lead to a recovery
whd^h today seems inconceivable.” (pg. 405)
W&at is- really at stake in regards to the AIDS issue is the
difference between political gains to be made by System politic-
al parties and racial victory to be gained by Aryan warriors.
Aryan racialists are the moral and spiritual superiors to System
lackeys and members of political parties. Let it be clear to all
Aryan* warriors^ that what we fight for is not merely a change in
political authority but rather the total victory of a PHILOSOPHY
OF LIFE! He said..,
“While the program of a solely political party is the formula for
a healthy outcome of the next elections, the program of a
philosophy is the formulation of a declaration of WAR against
the existing order, against a state of affairs; in short, against an
existing view of life to general.”
The AIDS issue is but one battle to that WAR in which we
are engaged. It is but one front at which we must fight. But if
our standard is our declaration of will to preserve the purity of
our blood, our victory is guaranteed! As we struggle on the
many fronts we face in our fight against a decaying and rotten
Worldview, we must remember that victory is ours! The greatest
Aryan leader promised it to us...
“And assuredly this world is moving toward a great revolution.
The question can only be whether it will redound to the benefit
of the Aryan humanity or to the benefit of the eternal Jew.” ,(p.
427)
“A state which in this age of racial poisoning dedicates itself to
the care of its best racial elements must someday become lord
of the earth.” (pg.688)
Next time you read the System press or watch the evening
news and hear of some hoped-for vaccine which will let a dying
Worldview continue on, without interruption, remember the
issue at hand: Purity of -Blood. The next time some bible-
54 ' , Liberty Bell
thumping pseudo-Jew, tells you that Jahweh is angered and has
set a pestilence upon the gentiles, take a close look at the
source. The next time some opportunistic System-politician
wails about AIDS and asks for your vote, ask him about the real
issue: Purity of Blood. Lastly, the next time anyone who is
outside of your Worldview expresses concerns about the AIDS
epidemic, be sure to tell them why AIDS IS OUR ISSUE! □
Another Look
At The Ger stein Statement
Robert L. Frens
In his book, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century , Dr.
Arthur Butz comments upon 'some of the asininities of that
so-called document, the "Gerstein Statement.” This supposed
confession of a certain Kurt Gerstein was used as partial evidence
: f |' for the justification of hanging some of Europe’s finest men
S' following that unnecessary conflagration known as the Second
|§ World War.
.hV This statement was again questioned during the 1985
S; political trial of Ernst Ziindel, a courageous revisionist publisher/
S speaker and resident of Toronto, Canada. Under questioning by
defense counsel Doug Christie, Dr. Raul Hilberg, an alleged
i-W; '‘expert” on a certain group of vanishing people, admitted that
i . Gerstein’s confession did indeed contain some errors. While Dr.
, Butz described Gerstein’s confession as "absolutely insane,” Dr.
/Hilberg commented that some remarks were “imaginative.”
; One of the "imaginative” descriptions involved the gassing to
, [‘death of people using the exhaust fumes from a diesel engine.
|f||Friedrich P. Berg, an accomplished civil engineer and revisionist
’^searcher, has presented valuable information demonstrating
;>M the tenuous nature of this method as a means of extermination.
• hfeDr. Butz points out that the job of cramming 700-800 people
l into a room of 45 cubic meters would require a scrap press to
V, accomplish. The people would thereby be crushed rendering
"gassing” rather superfluous.
Aside from Dr. Butz and Mr. Berg, I decided to view this
December 1986 56
episode from another perspective.
The technical information I used was found in the reference
works, Essentials of Nutrition , by Dr. Sherman of Columbia
University, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , from the
Chemical and Rubber Publishing Company , and Merck's Manual ,
a well-known physicians’ guide. I followed selected Gerstein
statements but they were not taken out of context. The
essence of these statements is as follows:
1. The chambers, numbering four, were of 45 cubic meters
volume. This is about 1590 cubic feet.
2. 700 to 800 people were placed in a chamber. The
assortment contained “lots of children of all ages,” women,
“men standing on the feet of others,” and babies at the breast.
3 . Once the chamber was filled, the doors were closed.
4. The people were to be “gassed” using the exhaust fumes
from a diesel engine .
5. The diesel engine could not be started.
6. Gerstein’s attention is fixed upon his stopwatch. He
monitors the elapsed time while the other chambers are loaded.
7. After 2 hours and 49 minutes, the engine starts and the
gassing begins.
8 . “After 28 minutes only a few are alive. After 32 minutes,
finally, all are dead.”
As a counter to the argument of Dr. Butz, I will invoke the
worn circular premise: “It was possible because it happened.”
Therefore, my discussion allows for the possibility of 700
people standing on a floor area of 25 square meters without
being crushed to death.
To continue, I will use the following conversions and data:
1. 700 people were placed in the chamber.
2. The chamber was of 1590 cubic feet volume.
3. There was an even distribution of babies, children,
women, and men.
4. The smallest baby weighed 10 pounds.
5 . The largest man weighed 150 pounds.
6. The average human body has a density of 60 pounds per
cubic foot.
7. In a standing state, the human body utilizes .012 kilo-
calories of energy per pound per minute.
8. Each kilocalorie of heat energy requires nearly one liter
of air for its production.
56 Liberty Bell
r .'\
f
m
$ <m
.* »
7m-.
m
¥
p,
b
P -
•"V/
'S'
9. Air is about 21 percent oxygen by volume.
10. Body glucose was the source of energy.
11. A cubic foot is equivalent to 28.32 liters.
12. By volume, the fatal level of carbon dioxide in the air is
12 percent.
Using 3,4, 5, we can say that the average person weighed 80
pounds. Therefore, the chamber contained 700 times 80
pounds or 56000 pounds of human material. Dividing this by
the density of 60 pounds per cubic foot, we arrive at a volume
of 933 cubic feet which represents the volume occupied by the
victims. This would leave 657 cubic feet of air in the chamber.
The concluding question would be, “How long could these 700
people live having access to 657 cubic feet of air, assuming that
they will all have died of carbon dioxide poisoning?”
At this point I would like to call attention to a rather
common error, the one that assumes that carbon dioxide is
“harmless.” One’s body can handle small amounts of this
substance without effect in the same manner as it handles table
salt, or hydrogen cyanide, for that matter. For many materials, it
is all a matter of concentration. Carbon dioxide poisoning
begins near the 5 percent point, causing extreme discomfort.
The fact that the body can recover from this, given access to.
fresh air, does not in the least detract from its poisonous nature.
Hydrogen sulfide is a more poisonous gas than hydrogen cyanide,
but in small concentrations it is merely the “stink” of rotten
eggs.
I will spare the reader the equation and calculator work, and
conclude that the 700 people, under the given conditions,
ft exhaled 4.43 cubic feet of carbon dioxide into their chamber
a for each minute they were alive. Twelve percent of 657 cubic
feet is 78.8 cubic feet. Therefore, in about 18 minutes the
- carbon dioxide level would have been such that all would have
been dead.
If we assume that poisoning by carbon dioxide is impossible
and that the body can consume oxygen to the last molecule, we
'can arrive at a corollary conclusion. In the chamber, there were
657 times 21 percent, or 138 cubic feet of oxygen. During
[■ glucose combustion, the consumed volume of oxygen and the
produced volume of carbon dioxide is the same. At a rate of
4.43 cubic feet per minute, it would take our 700 people (138
divided by 4.43) 31 minutes to have consumed all of the
oxygen present. In this case, they would all have been a victim
iDon&m hor 1 QRfZ 57
of hypoxia.
Whether they were all dead in 18 minutes of carbon dioxide
poisoning or in 31 minutes due to hypoxia, the point remains
unchanged. Gerstein notes that the people were still waiting
after 70 minutes. After another 99 minutes, the engine finally
starts ;and the gassing commences. This continues for 32
minutes,
‘This different view of Gerstein ’s account additionally serves
to illustrate the patent nonsense of that “confession.” The
nonsense of the past and the continuing nonsense regarding the
so-caHed “Nazi horrors” would be comic were it not for the fact
that this nonsense is believed by the unthinking public.
But nonsense it is to believe, that 700 people could be
herded into a building the size of a two-car garage, and that
they would still be calmly breathing after 30 minutes of such
confinement. □
j
L. P agar ell
Reprinted from Insight
241-720 6th Street, New Westminster B.C. V3L 3C5 Canada
British author David Irving shocked many of the 250 people
who crowded into the Sandman Inn Hotel in Vancouver on 31
March to hear him speak by telling them that Hitler did not
want any harm to come to the Jewish people. His disclosure
that original documents show that from 1923 until 1944 Hitler
ordered a number of times that Jewish people should not be
harmed in any way resulted in gasps from a few in the audience.
Irving, who is fluent in German, is widely respected as a
diligent researcher who studies original documents and material,
from personal diaries of National Socialist leaders to records of
telephone conversations of people such as Heinrich Himmler,
when preparing his manuscripts.
Examples of Hitler’s attitude towards the Jews given by
Irving were:
1. In 1923, when party leaders were told that a number of
Jewish people had been physically and verbally abused on a
58 Liberty Bell
r
street in Munich, Hitler ordered that the men who did this be
brought before him, reprimanded, and thrown out of the party.
2. On November 9th. 1938, the so-called “Crystal Night,”
when Hitler was informed late in the evening that synagogues
and Jewish stores were being attacked, he immediately ordered
that all police be dispatched to stop the actions and that those
responsible' be caught and punished. Irving held up a copy of
this order.
3. In 1942, Hitler ordered that the transport to; and the
resettlement of the Jewish people in, the eastern territories be
stopped until the end of the war.
4. Not one document has ever been found which shows that
Hitler ordered, or was aware of, the liquidation of Jewish
people in camps or anywhere else either before or during the
war. Irving reiterated his 1000 pound sterling offer to anyone
who can produce such a document.
Other important points mentioned in the speech were:
1. Hitler offered very favorable terms to Britain in June of
1940 for a negotiated peace, which at least 3 of the 6 men in
the British War Cabinet wanted to accept. However, Churchill
demanded the war continue with increased bombing of German
cities because he realized he may lose his job as Prime Minister
if he “...made peace with Hitler.” To prevent the British people
from finding out the terms of the German peace offer, he
prevented the British ambassador in Washington, who was aware
of the terms, from speaking to anyone about it. Rudolf Hess
flew to Britain in 1940 to help persuade Churchill to be reason -
} able by speaking with political friends there. The records of the
Hess flight were ordered by Churchill to be kept locked in a
vault in the British archives until the year 2030.
2. Franklin D. Roosevelt, Thomas Ickles, the U.S. Secretary
■ of State, and Canadian Prime Minister Mackenzie King are all on
■' record as describing Churchill as being a drunk.
3. One reason that disease was wide-spread in the concen-
tration camps when the Allied forces entered them at the end of
'V the war was because of an Allied campaign to bomb medical
and pharmaceutical factories.
4. Churc hill became obsessed with destroying Germans. On
July 6, 1944 he ordered that 2,000,000 Anthrax bombs be
dropped on German cities and continued these demands for one
month. A few Anthrax bombs were dropped on an island during
the war to test them, and that island is uninhabitable to this
day. Anthrax is a disease carried by pigs and sheep which causes
December 1986 59
high fever arid death .
Irving was asked whether he believed there was a central
agency or group twisting and manipulating the news presented
in the media today. His reply was that such an agency was not
necessary because reporters, editors, and media owners have an
‘instinctive,’ in -bred awareness of the way that ‘news’ is to be
presented to further the interests of certain groups in society.
On the whole, Irving’s informative- and often humorous
speech was received with overwhelming enthusiasm by those
who attended.
Does the West have the will to survive?
That is the obvious question posed by Jean Raspail's
terrifying novel of the swamping of the White world
by an unlimited flood of non-White "refugees." But
there is also a less obvious and even more
fundamental question: Must Whites find their way
to a new morality and a new spirituality in order to
face the moral challenges of the present and
overcome them? THE CAMP OF THE SAINTS is the
most frightening book you will ever read. It is
frightening because it it is utterly believable. The
armada of refugee ships in Raspail's story is exactly
like the one that dumped 150,000 Cubans from
Fidel Castro's prisons and insane asylums on our
shores in 1 980 — except this time the armada is from
I ndia, with more than 70 times as large a population.
And it is only the first armada of many. If any book
will awaken White Americans to the danger they face
from uncontrolled immigration, it is THE CAMP OF
THE SAINTS. For your copy send $9.00 (which includes $1 .00 for shipping) to:
LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS, Box 21, Reedy, WV 25270 USA
60
Liberty Bell
KEEP THE LIBERTY BELL RINGING!
Please remember: Our fight is Your fight! Donate whatever you
can spare on a regular— monthly or quarterly— basis. Whether it is
$2., $5., $20., or $100. or more, rest assured it is needed here and
will be used in our common struggle. If you are a businessman,
postage stamps in any denomination, are a legitimate business
expense— and we need and use many of these here every month, and
will be gratefully accepted as donations.
Your donations .wili help us spread the Message of Liberty and
White Survival throughout the land, by making available additional
copies of our printed material to fellow Whites who do not yet know
what is in store for them.
Order our pamphlets, booklets, stickers, and— most importantly—
our reprints which are ideally suited for mass distribution at
reasonable cost. Order extra copies of Liberty Bell for distribution
to your circle of friends, neighbors and relatives, urging them to .
subscribe to our unique publication. Our bulk prices are shown on
the inside front cover of every issue of Liberty Bell
Pass along your copy of Liberty Bell , and copies of reprints you
obtained from us, to friends and acquaintances who may be on our
‘wave length/ and urge them to contact us for more of the same.
Carry on the fight to free our White people from the shackles of
alien domination, even if you can only join our ranks in spirit. You
can provide for this by bequest. The following are suggested forms
of bequests which you may include in your Last Will and Testament:
#
1. I bequeath to Mr. George P. Dietz, as Trustee for Liberty Bell
Publications, P.O. Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA, “the sum of
$ for general purposes.
2. 1 bequeath to Mr. George P. Dietz, as Trustee for Liberty Bell
Publications, P.O. Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA, the following
described property for general purposes.
DO YOUR PART TODAY — HELP FREE OUR WHITE
RACE FROM ALIEN DOMINATION!
V'. »y...