>*■
- ; *■
■ » • , i v
• »>v!i
• . V -
■ • ■- m'*’. -,v. * ;*>■,. \u
» * • • r» • * ' w*Jl *V ’ r.
* . *V ;y "
- . '( .#,*• . . • ••«
^/f7*i vTtt <
"Jewish Power? — It's nothing compared with the awesome
power of the anti-Semites! Believe me, I know — my
television network is doing a mini-series about them."
VOICE OF AMERICAS NEW REVOLUTION
^K6)' i r Q-
:i ijiifNJi;;:
71
• THE LIBERTY BELL
is published monthly by LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS, George
P. Dietz, Editor. Editorial offices: P.O. Box 21, Reedy, W.Va. 25270
USA. Phone: 304-927-4490.
Manuscripts conforming to our editorial policy are always
welcome, however, they cannot be returned unless accompanied by
stamped, self-addressed envelope. Manuscripts accepted for publi-
cation become the property of Liberty Bell Publications.
COPYRIGHTT 1981 by Liberty Bell Publications
Permission granted to quote in whole or part with
proper source credit and address.
One
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION RATES: Year
THIRD CLASS— Bulk Rate-USA only $13.00
FIRST CLASS— USA, CANADA, MEXICO $20.00
THIRD CLASS-ALL COUNTRIES-OVERSEAS $19.00
FIRST CLASS-ALL COUNTRIES-OVERSEAS $22.00
AIR MAIL— EUROPE— SOUTH AMERICA $32.00
AIR MAIL-FAR EAST -MIDDLE EAST-AFRICA $37,00
Single copy, 3rd class in plain envelope . $ 1.50
10 copies via UPS $ 10.00
1 00 copies via UPS ' * $ 75,00
500 copies via UPS . $250.00
1000 copies via UPS ; $450.00
ADVERTISING RATES:
FULL PAGE $100.00
HALF PAGE $60.00
QUARTER PAGE $ 35.00
EIGHTH PAGE $ 20.00
DISCOUNTS: 5% on 6 month contract; 10% on 12 month contract,
payable in advance. DEADLINE is the 15th day preceding the
month of publication.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH— FREEDOM OF THOUGHT
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
The editor-publisher of THE LIBERTY BELL does not necessarily agree
with each and every article appearing in this magazine,, nor doeshe.. subscribe to
all conclusions arrived at by various writers, however, he does endeavor to
permit the exposure of ideas suppressed by the controlled news media of this
country.
It is, therefore, in the best tradition of America and of free men everywhere
that THE LIBERTY BELL strives to give free reign to ideas, for ultimately, it
is ideas which rule the world and determine both the content and structure of
culture.
We believe that we can and will change our society for the better. We
declare our long-held view that no institution or government created by men,
for men, is inviolable, incorruptible and not subject to evolution, change or
replacement by the Will of the people.
T o this we dedicate our lives and our work. No effort will be spared and no
idea will be allowed to go unexpressed if we think it will benefit the people,
not only of America, but the entire World, G0or „ 0 p, DietZi Editor & p ubMther
PLEASE, HELP US
SPREAD THE TRUTH!
Order additional copies of
THE HOAX OF THE 20th. CENTURY
by Prof. A.R. Butz
at these prices:
l/$6.00-3/$15.00-10/$45.00
100/$400.00-l,000/$3, 500.00
from:
LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS
Box 21, Reedy, West Virginia 25270
CONTENTS
VOL. 8 - NO. 10
JUNE 1981
Letters to the Editor 3
The Enemy of Europe, Part II 7
/
I
Read what famous
and 'infamous' men have
to say about the JJews.
200 pp., pb., $5.50 plus
10% for postage. Order from
LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS
Box 21, Reedy, W.Va. 25270
COMMUNISM
IS JEWISH!
stamp $3.75 postage $0.50
ORDER TODAYI
$8,50 postpaid
Aluminum paperweight
$4.50 postpaid
For novelty paperweight use only.
Not intended for any other use.
ORDER FROM:
LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS
Box 21, Reedy, W.Va. 25270 USA
KEEP THE LIBERTY BELL
RINGING!
Please remember: OUR fight is YOUR
fight! Donate whatever you can spare
on a monthly basis. Whether it is $1.,
$2., $5. or $100 or mqre, rest assured
it is needed here and will be used in our
common struggle. If you are a business'
or professional man, send us postage
stamps in any denomination; remem-
ber — they're tax-deductible! Your do-
nations will help us spread the Message
of Liberty throughout the land by
making available additional copies of
our printed material to patriots who
do not yet know about what is in store
for them.
Buy our pamphlets, booklets, stickers
and reprints. Buy extra copies of The
Liberty Bell for distribution to your
friends and neighbors and urge them
to subscribe to our publication. Our
bulk prices are included with every
issue.
Pass along your copy of The Liberty
Bell, end copies of reprints you pur-
chased from us, to a friend or acquain-
tance who may be on our 'wavelength'
and urge them to contact us for more
of the same.
Carry on the. fight to free America and
the world frofb alien domination, even
if you can only join our ranks in spirit.
You can provide for this by bequest.
The following are suggested forms of
bequests which you may include in
your will:
a. I bequeath to Mr George P. Dietz
as trustee for Liberty Bel| Publi-
cations, Main Street (P.O. Box 21)
Reedy, W.Va. 25270 USA, the sum of
$. for general purposes.
' b. I bequeath to Mr George P. Dietz
as trustee for Liberty Bell Publi-
cations, Main Street, (P.O. Box 21)
Reedy, W.Va. 25270 USA, the fbllow-
ing- described property for
general purposes.
DO YOUR PART TODAYI
HELP FREE AMERICA
FROM ALIEN DOMINATION! .
The Liberty Bell
2
Dear George: 17 Feb. 81
I hope you will forgive my persistance on the matter, but I feel obliged
to illuminate the further ‘‘administration of justice” in Belgium. This time
the continued witch-hunt in Brussels on the French speaking “extreme
right movements” — “Front de la Jeunesse.”
In a style worthy of the “Inquisition,” 35 members of this group have
been summoned to the Brussels Court of of Justice for a first hearing on
February 12,1981. The accusation: demonstrations without authorization,
private militia taking part in exercises with arms and ammunition,
intentional arson on the premises of the Belgian-Vietnamese Committee,
etc.
During the same period, and in addition to the already existing laws in
Belgium on the subject, a bili has been introduced (Socialist member of
Parliament Glimmer-Dujardin) and is already adopted in parliament, to
make punishable by law: hatred against foreigners and incitement to
discrimination on the basis of race, colour or ethnic descent. Incriminatory
will then be these infringements in meetings, assemblies and public places.
Also by publications, pictures, emblems or symbols which can be pasted
up, distributed, publically displayed or mailed to different persons. -
Master mind behind all this, Socialist minister of civil affairs Moureaux.
The policy of this sinister hireling is to destroy the active ranks of the
opposition with these curbs and to break the spear heads via costly and
devastating mass-trials.
In Belgium we’ll have to work out a new strategy.
Best regards,
. P.W., Belgium
il, kU .1.
iy* 'I*
Dear Mr. Dietz: 1 March 81
Thank you for the books you sent, and especially for all the extra
material you included. I really appreciated it very much.
The material you sent me is used in monthly discussions of our school’s
history society, of which I am the chairman. Last year I used Prof. Butz’
and Mr. Christophersen’s publications to write my history thesis on the
Auschwitz Myth. I got almost 90%, regardless of the “most extraordinary
conclusion” (my teacher’s comment) to which I came! I also wrote an
article on the environmental and genetic theories and racial achievement
for the German (third language) part of our school magazine. My German '
teacher, used to European educational standards, called it a “bomb” and
said that she didn’t want to see her class smeared as “Nazi.” Fortunately
however, it was published, and strangely enough not one Jewish or other
student or teacher has reacted yet.
June 1981 3
\
Since most of the members of our history society are in Std. 7 (15
years) and cover WW II etc. this year in class, I am planning to hold a
discussion on the real solution to the kosher surplus, just after they have
finished the Six Million lie in class! I shall inform you about the results
and reactions among them.
A militant right-wing organisation, consisting mostly of blue collar
workers and called the “Wit Kommando 55 (White Commando), is presently
active in South Africa. Their symbol is a cross (WtK) and they want to
prevent a Marxist regime by attacking liberal persons or institutions who
propagate race mixing. In April 1980, fires broke out in the office of the
Institute for Racial Affairs. In August the office of Prof. Jan Lombard,
who initiated a plan of multiracial cooperation, was bombed. In December
the offices of Prof. F.A, Maintz, a sociologist who testified for the defense
in the Silverton terrorist case, were also attacked, but in none of the above
cases anyone was injured.
Other attacks were made on the Transkei consulate in Port Elizabeth
and on the house of a Member of the Executive Committee, Mr.
Watterson. Death threats were received by well-known TV commentator
Cliff Saunders, the principal of a gymnasium, who enrolled the son of a
Black attache at his school, and Bishop Desmond Jutu, black general
secretary of the S.A. Council of Churches, who is very sympathetic
towards black terrorists.
On 6 February, Mr. M. Bolla (Italian), Mr. M. Huggett (English), Mr.
W.G. van Dyk (Afrikaner), and Mr. B.M.A. Fetheringham, were arrested
and explosives and “subversive I * * * 5 * literature confiscated. Mr. Allen
Fetheringham is the chairman of the S.A. National Front, which ceased to
exist 16 months ago and then went underground as the W.K. Since the
police investigation is not finished, no date for the court hearing is
available yet.
I am including another order herewith and would be most grateful if
you could send me a copy of “Unser Liederbuch 55 which you mentioned in
your letter to me, with the other books.
Thank you in anticipation, and White Power!
H.M., So. Africa
♦t* ^ ^1*
Dear Mr Dietz: 1 March 81
Young black urban guerrillas have a new thing going in Miami. They
throw bricks through windows of locked doors of cars at stop signs, red
lights, and rob passengers. Most are White females. There were over 26
incidents or attacks of this nature on February 27, 1981, between 79th
Street and 54th Street N.W. on 22nd Ave. and 27th Ave.
Commie groups are agitating young blacks to do this. Revolutionary
Workers (RW) of Atlanta, Georgia., and Communist Workers Party (CWP)
are the main agitators. I believe this summer in Miami will be worse than
last summer, with Commie groups agitating and with Castro Invasion
Agents in Miami also.
j
The Liberty Bell
!
White Power!
J.T., Florida
* * * * *
Dear George: 5 March 81
Reference the pro and c.on articles in the “Liberty Bell 55 on
Christianity. Much of what is said on both sides of the issue is true.
However, do you think it wise to stir up this age-old controversy and lose
the friendship of the people for whom you profess an affinity and
zealousness in trying to awaken them to the peril of their real foe — the
conniving Jew?
As old Ben Franklin said so many years ago, “We must all hang
together, or assuredly we shall hang separately. 55 In over 50 years of
association with various tight-wing patriots it has been my tacit
observation and experience that practically every organization dedicated
to saving the country has been destroyed from within by endless bickering.
My! how the Jews love and encourage the yokels to squabble among
themselves while they band together and take over. [You are absolutely
correct! The Jews are not splintered into ‘Methodists, 5 ‘Baptists, 5
‘Mormons, 5 ‘Assemblies of God, 5 ‘Identity Christians, 5 and all the rest of
the sorry lot believing in Oriental myths. When it comes to fighting their
enemies, the Yids are ONE race-of-the-mind and of ONE religion. Our
White brethren have been robbed of their race-consciousness and fighting
spirit by their Christian ‘businessmen-of-God 5 !]
Remember, if we don 5 t have common cause [We do! But RACE is the
issue — not an Oriental religion that, first of all, has made drooling idiots
and mental slaves out of many of our fellow White Men, and, secondly, a
religion that has put the Yids into the positions of power they now hold,
and which is determined to keep ‘God 5 s Chosen 5 in these positions, come
what may!] under a captain of our own choosing to steer the good old
conservative ship of the U.S. on this hazardous voyage, none of our breed
will be given another opportunity to guide her under our God-given
Constitution for which the “Founding Fathers 55 gave their all.
Although Reagan is far from being the ideal conservative that he
pictures himself, we should be thankful that Carter, the Southern
skalawag, has been turned out of office in disgrace [But Carter was a good
“Born-Again Christian!] . Never in the history of the U.S. has any
President gone down to such ignominious defeat. A victim of his own
dishonesty and deceit. He was a typical example of a Janus-faced politician
wearing one face for himself, and another to the public, finally becoming
bewildered as to which was his rightful one. His double dealing belatedly
caught up with him. He was weighed in the balance and found wanting.
Let’s keep religious controversies out of the Liberty Bell and
concentrate on getting the DeviPs disciples out of our government,
schools, information media, big business, churches and our country.
, No one has ever condemned the Jews in more vitriolic language than
Jesus Christ. Read Matt. Chapter 23: and other paragraphs in the Bible.
June 1981
«
J.C.L., North Carolina
P$: Enclosed is my check for a one year renewal of my subscription to the
Liberty Bell.
J* •i' «A* >!>
V *r* *T* ■T*
Dear Mr Dietz: . 7 March 81
The Jan. 81 issue of the Liberty Bell is fantastic. ‘Good Riddance’
indeed to that mattoid vampire Lennon! Please send me another copy of
that issue.
I also thoroughly enjoyed “The Whiteman’s Guide Book”. The whole
issue is a masterpiece.
Best regards
G.R., Illinois
sb 4* 4* 4*
^ o' n'
Dear Mr Dietz: 10 March 81
Just a note to tell you that ‘Liberty Bell’ gets more dynamic with each
issue, and that I think you and what you are doing is terrific — but — I also
think it is too strong for beginners and that we should reserve this sort of
thing for the inner core and proceed more cautiously if we intend to win
over the neophytes.
We have only to look at the methods used by our enemy to see that we
must lead them carefully into this. Most of the uninformed could not
possibly change overnight from Christianity to the Nature Gods of our
Germanic forefathers. We have all been saturated for too many centuries in
this drivel. So, I wish there was some way that you could continued to give '
us awakened ones more of the same and publish a more toned down
version for the beginners. [That’s impossible! A cancerous tumor cannot
be treated with Bufferins. It requires radical surgery or the patient will
die!] I couldn’t possibly give some of my friends copies of these more
hard-hitting issues of late [Why couldn’t you? Does the survival of our
White Race mean less to you than the friendship and good-will of your
friends who are yet mental slaves, but who could conceivably be turned
from ‘neophytes’ into ‘people-in-th e-know ’? Let them read our material
and give them a chance to make up their own minds. If they are worth
saving at all, they’ll get the message!]
I hope this does not offend you; personally I regard you as one of our
racial heroes. Please accept the enclosed check as an enthusiastic
contribution to your work [Thank you very much indeed!]
Sincerely,
Mrs J.M., California
* * * *
Dear Mr Dietz: 11 March 81
How precious are the words of those who seek the truth! That’s how
we feel about your publication THE LIBERTY BELL. As soon as your
„ magazine arrives, I find my husband poring over it. Then, bursting with the
f latest information, he’ll sit me down and explain over all the fascinating
material you present. A lot of it is new to us, but we are very open-minded
continued ' on page 5 5
6 The Liberty Bell
\
ENEMY
OF EUROPE
u
| PART II, continued from previous issue
Copyright ©1981
by Thomas Francis
1
i
|
All rights reserved. No part of this
book, except brief excerpts for the pur-
• pose of review, may be reproduced in any
form without written permission by the
publisher. For information write to:
X
l LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS
Box 21, Reedy, W.Va. 25270 USA
1981
Liberty Bell Publicalioiis
V
i
THE INNER ENEMY OF EUROPE
An inner enemy is more dangerous than an outer one,
because while he seems to belong, he is actually a kind of alien.
The Inner Enemy of Europe is at once a stratum of the
population, a world-outlook, and a Culture-illness. The Michel-
stratum is Europe’s Inner Enemy, the stratum that commits
treason organically and instinctively. Its world-outlook is that
of the past Age of Nationalism, Economics, Democracy,
Capitalism. Because it looks backward and resists the Impera-
tive of the Future with pathological intensity, this stratum is
the embodiment of the Culture-disease called Culture-retar-
dation.*
f
, An inner enemy is dangerous in two respects: first, because
of his own activity, and, second, because of his usefulness to the
outer enemy. During the Second World War, the European
Michel consciously worked for the defeat of Europe and the
victory of the American-Russian coalition. Examples of this
conduct were Churchill and Attlee in England, Badoglio and
Mauggeri in Italy, Haider, Hassel, and Goerdeler in Germany,
the Communists in France, the Netherlands, Spain, and Scandi-
navia. Without this organic, professional treason on the part of
the European Michel, the Outer Forces could never have
defeated Europe. After the War, the American occupation of
Europe and the despoliation of Europe were made possible only
by the Michel-stratum, which hired itself out to the enemy to
establish vassal-governments, churchill-regimes, in every pro-
vince of Europe. During this period between the Second and
Third World Wars, the Michel as an American agent is more
dangerous than he would otherwise be in himself. The reason
for this is the advance of History since the 19th century has
rendered his world-outlook completely useless to him, even for
purposes of sabotage, while to the Americans it is still useful as
a means of control over Europe. Thus the Culture-disease of
Culture-retardation remains in the body of Europe only because
of the American occupation.
If “capitalism” is understood not simply as an economic
technique, but, above all, as a spiritual-ethical principle, we may
* Cf. IMPERIUM, p. 410 ff.
48
designate the world-outlook of the Michel as Capi-
talism . In the 20th century, Capitalism is inwardly dead, both in
the broader sense of a Cultural-ethical world-outlook and as an
economic technique. The fact that it is dead is shown every
time its representatives approach some new problem in the
world of facts. Their solutions are uniformly rigid and in every
case misfire, even when the problem is purely economic. After
the Second World War, the English government that called itself
“socialist” decided to “nationalise” the railways. The sole
possible raison d'etre for nationalisation of the railways lay in
reducing costs for the ultimate consumer, thus granting a sort of
general rebate. But there resulted a doubling of all fares and a
continuation of the separate identity of the lines, even to the
point of competitive advertising. The programme remained in
existence only for the sake of the principle of nationalisation.
All other “nationalisation” schemes that originated with this
capitalistic, class-war inciting Marxist regime ended similarly.
The singularly unhappy career of the capitalist system was
continued throughout Europe after the Second World War, to
be sure, because of intervention coming from the Culture-
periphery. Unhesitatingly, the Washington regime employed the
resources of the North American continent to shore up the
tottering system. Thus it is only the extra-European power of
the Washington regime that subjects Europe to the negative
world-outlook and outworn economic system of capitalism. A
European revolt against capitalism is ipso facto a revolt against
America. A Socialist Europe, founded on the principle of the
sovereign, organically articulated State, would be an indepen-
dent Europe and master of its own economy. This economy
would not be established for reasons of class-war, nor for the
purpose of realising any rigid, abstract ideas. On the contrary, it
would be an economy that overcomes the economic problems
of Europe in the spirit of the 20th century, and, indeed, in their
sole possible way of solution: the State as organism and its
economy as part of an organic totality to which all private and
class interests are subordinate.
Before the First World War, the European power-monopoly,
the monopoly of trade and technics, secured all requisite
markets for the products of Europe, and with these products
Europe paid for the raw and other materials it ordered from
abroad. The First World War undermined this system in that,
49
t
for its duration, it deprived the overseas consumers of European
merchandise, and thus gave them the stimulus to construct
factories of their own. After the War, the capitalist international
economy was never again able to solve its problems,, not even
through extensive state-intervention in the form of protective
tariffs, and the like. This development was concluded by the
Second World War. The old system passed away.
The only solution for the economic problems of Europe
consists in the most intensive possible rationalisation of all
existing possessions and in the acquisition of new resources for
the European economy. Naturally, America insists that Europe
keep the capitalist system. A Socialist Europe does not need
America, whereas a capitalist Europe is a beggars* colony of
America.
In the basic world-outlook of both the American population
and the ruling economic caste the world is still the object of
plunder. America is not interested in forming and organising the
world, but in creating the widest possible opportunities for
financial-economic penetration of other countries. It is driven
even to military conquest to attain this goal securely. Again,
this is 19th century motivation, and its corrosive, pathological
revival in our Age is a symptom of Culture-retardation.*
To the finance-capitalist politico-military thought is merely a
tool, albeit that it may seem to predominate at times. It is a
dangerous . weapon. The possibility is ever present that a
political general might like to rule the roost. The political
general is the nightmare of the finance-capitalist, and therein lies
the explanation for the inferior businessman-type and feeble-
minded liberals that make up the American generalcy. All
officers of strong will and superior intellect are weeded out
before they attain to the rank of general; and in 1941 the Army
regulations were so revised that automatic promotion to general
— which had been the rule in the American Army since its
beginnings in the 18th century •— was eliminated, and promo-
tion to that rank made dependent on c ‘service, ** i.e., subservi-
ence to the Washington regime, or in other words, on the lack
of any earnest will and strong instincts.
To recapitulate everything: the Inner Enemy of Europe may
be described in three ways:
1. With regard to his Culture-biological value.
2. With regard to which stratum embodies him.
3. With regard to his conception of the world.
1. The Inner Enemy is the bearer of Culture-retardation.
2. The Inner Enemy is the Michel-stratum; his leaders are the
churchills.
3. The Inner Enemy is Capitalism^ whereby the word is used
in its total meaning of a Cultural-spiritual-ethical-economic
principle.
In contrast to the foregoing, the true European spirit may be
likewise sketched:
1. It is Culture-health, i.e., the actualisation of the Inner
Imperative, accepting the challenge of the Future.
2. It is in the charge of the Culture-bearing stratum, the
highest elite of the population, which stratum comprises
no more than circa 250,000 souls.
3. It is the grand Idea of Imperialism* the world-outlook that
is suited to the coming European Imperium of Culture-
State-Nation-People-Race-Society.
For the purpose of demonstrating with the utmost clarity the
elements of the two world-Outlooks in this period of Western
History between the Second and Third World Wars, a paradigm
is appended:
Capitalism
Rationalism
Materialism
Sensualism
Will-to-Riches
World as object of plunder
Wealth as social distinction
Society as a collection of indi-
viduals
“Pursuit of happiness**
Imperialism
Faith
Primacy of the Spirit
Idealism
Wm-to-Power
World as object of organi-
sation
Rank as social distinction
Society as organism
Fulfilment of Duty
* Cf. IMPERIUM, p. 517 ff.
SO
Ascendant instincts:
1. Absolute Western self-pre-
Decadent instincts:
1. Acquiescence to the Outer
51
II
servation
2. Absolute will to biological
fertility
3. Absolute will to increase
power
Hierarchy
Discipline
Authority
The superpersonal organism as
State
Aristocracy
Society as an organic unity
Sexual polarity
Europe as Imperium
Europe as Nation
Europe as Fatherland
Order
Stability .
Responsibility, all public
power exercised and ad-
ministered openly
Resurgence of Authority
Ideal of Chivalry, faith in one-
self
Respect for the political ene-
my
Cultivation of soldierly virtues
Eroticism as legitimate source
of joy and fertility
Affirmation of War and Con-
quest
Separate status of Culture-
alien
Revolt
2. Race-suicide, birth control,
Puritanism, ! Bohemianism
3. Surrender of the World-he-
gemony of the West
Equality
Freedom, ethical laissez-faire
Parliamentarianism
The superpersonal organism as
society
Plutocracy
Class-war
Feminism
Petty -statism
Chauvinism
Petty -nationalism
Freedom
Constant motion, business-
cycles
I r r e sp onsibility , anonymity,
public power in the hands
of private persons, finance-
capitalists, labour-dictators
Communism, Democracy Li-
beralism
Separation of Word and Deed,
systematic hypocrisy
Replacement of respect by
hatred, “war-crimes trials,”
ideals as a substitute for
Honour on the battlefield
Cult of bourgeois virtues, the
derision of soldierly virtues
Eroticism as vice, the cult of
immorality, general spread
of clandestine and illegal
prostitution, an Erotic with-
out t consequences
Pacifism, preparation of the
c oloured p opulations for
“self-government,” the
“right of self-determina-
tion”
Equality with the Culture-
alien, the “melting pot”
52
Western Man as an indi-
vidualised human being,
completely different from
primitive non-Westem hu-
mans, Western Man in the
service of a great Mission:
the fulfilment of the Euro-
pean Culture
Art practiced in conformity
with the Cultural task
Politico-military expansion
Rousseau: Man as Savage
Darwin: Man as Animal
Marx: Man as economic crea-
ture
Freud: Man as sexual creature
Science-as-Religion: Man as
Machine, capable of limit-
less existence, “Victory
over disease,” etc.
“L’art pour Fart”
Financial-military-economic
expansion
From a cursory glance at the list of examples it is obvious
that the reigning forces of Culture-retardation make use of the
ideas and instincts of Imperialism whenever and wherever they
find it necessary and possible. For instance, they subordinate
Art to Politics. They have set up a new, inverted hierarchy in
which the American and the Michel are the patricians and the
true European is the plebeian. They preach “democracy” while
ruthlessly imposing their will on the masses and pressuring them
in so-called elections; they deny the rightness of the Idea of
Conquest while occupying Europe with their troops and forcing
its people to take on heavy political, military, and economic
burdens in the interest of the extra-European powers, and so
on.
This is the Age of Absolute Politics, and everyone who acts in
this Age, acts in its spirit, whether he knows it or not, whether
he wishes it or not. If he reflects, makes use of, values that run
counter to his stated political beliefs and aims, then he is either
hopelessly stupid or is pursuing some other goal than the
fulfilment of the Destiny of Europe — * the formation of the
Western Imperium in the spirit of Ethical Socialism.
There are two designs here: the first is the design of the
European Michel, who seeks only his own advantage (the
churchills) or that of his class (the finance-capitalist class; the
proletarian usufructuaries of the looting of the body of
Europe). The second design is that of the Cultural-outsider, the
total alien, who in his boundless rancour directs a political
will-to-annihilation against the West, who negates its Inner
\
53
Imperative, who would strangle its Destiny and divert it from
the. Future. Geographically, he may act from outside the
Western Culture, or inside, in the form of Culture-distortion. In
each case, it is his spirituality that clinches the matter, and the
Culture-distorter is one of the Outer Enemies of Europe.
i
i
K
\
t
i
t
I
THE OUTER ENEMIES OF EUROPE
When used in Politics, the word enemy has a meaning
completely different from what it has when used in regard to
Culture or private life. In private life, we call him our enemy
who bears us ill will. Applied to world politics, this definition is
meaningless, for no state bears ill will in any private sense. That
is true even in those cases in which a political unit is animated
by a purely negative will, and would express it politically. For
the form-world of Politics itself conditions all political activity
and transforms its whole content into power activity. However,
Politics seldom does supply its own motivation — that is to be
sought in another realm.
The motivation of the global power-struggle in our Age of
Absolute Politics lies in Culture . On the planet there is only one
High Culture in the process of fulfilment, the Western Culture,
and as a spiritual front it naturally assumes the following form:
the West against the Outer Revolt. The spiritual motivation of
the politics of all outer forces whatever is the will-to-annihilate
the Western Culture. In a power-struggle between Europe and
any outer force, each contestant will, however, strive for power,
that means control over the other. The motivation of the
contestants will become apparent only after a power-decision in
the struggle. Thus it is obvious that the West does not have the
desire to destroy the peoples, territories, resources, and low
cultures of the outer forces, whereas these outer forces most
emphatically wish to destroy the peoples, landscape, resources,
and the High Culture of Europe, as the Russian-American
occupation of Europe after the Second World War demon-
strated.
In the purely spiritual sense, then, Europe has but one
“enemy,” the Outer Revolt against the World Hegemony of the
West. From this great, fundamental fact we know that the
Outer Revolt will provide Europe with political enemies so long
as the Age of Absolute Politics lasts. A European victory in the
struggle for the planet will not extinguish the Outer Revolt as a
spiritual front; it will simply prevent it from again rising to the
level of political intensity.
At present, this spiritual front is divided into two political
units: Russia and America-Jewry. Culturally, it is anomalous
55
54
(
i
that America and one of the outer enemies of Europe are
interdependent, for America belongs by its origin and fate to
the Western Culture. All the same, it must now be counted
among the enemies of Europe, since ethically and politically it
is dominated by the Culture-alien Jewish entity of Church-
State-Nation-Society-Race. Just how this domination came
about is of less concern to Europe than the fact of it. Tlie
objective events of world-history sincel933 show that in not one
instance has America pursued an American nationalist policy,
but exclusively a policy in the interests of the Jewish entity.
In order to bring the metapolitical realities of this period
between the Second and Third World Wars into clearer focus,
each of the Outer Enemies of Europe must be examined
separately.
America is, and shall always be, a colony of the Western
Culture. A colonial spirituality determines the fate of colonies.
So it has been with every previous Culture. When on the j
Home-soil the parent-Culture becomes extinct, everywhere the
colonies perish. Population-streams may continue in primitive
form; landscapes, of course, remain, but they are desolate and
tyrannise the human beings that just yesterday dominated
them; edifices may yet stand, but their symbolism is no longer
understood. A colony is linked by a mystical bond, as though
by a spiritual umbilical cord, to the parent organism, a bond
just as inexplicable and just as real as the one that binds the
Culture to the soil on which it was bom. A colony thus shares a
common history with the parent-organism, and its life reflects —
with a natural and organic retardation — the development of the
Culture. In the case of America, this retardation generally
corresponds to the life-duration of one generation. This lagging
behind is not the same thing as Culture-retardation, for it is
natural and unavoidable. Still, that tardiness is serviceable to the
Culturally-parasitic group which is now contriving to prevent
the American colony from reflecting the development of its
parent-organism. This pathological design is unattainable, ,of
course, but any such deviation from Culture-health must have
enormous effects on the host before the parasite is expelled.
The Jewish entity is a Cultural form- world of its own stamp,
and can therefore nev er be assimilated by the Western Culture.*
* Cf. IMPERIUM, p. 376 ff. ' :
56
Since this entity finds itself inside the West — geographically
speaking — and since it must seek its political actualisation, it
necessarily influences Western politics in the direction of its
own interests. Though it be of alien origin, it must not appear
alien; its politics must be regarded as though it were legitimate
politics, and not the alien politics it is. The Western ideology of
the 18th and 19th centuries was admirably suited to the
political needs of the Jewish entity, but with the passing away
of that ideology and the birth of the Age of Absolute Politics,
the preconditions for the successful political activity of the
Jewish entity on European soil completely vanished. The fictive
constructs of “Liberie, Egalite , Fraternity have entirely died
out in Europe; hence the political history of the Jews, as
quasi-members of the Western nations, has also ended. Even so,
the colonial tardiness in Cultural development and the disease
of Culture -retardation make it possible for Jewry to retain its
uncontested domination over the American people.
In this period of history, America and Jewry form a
Symbiosis. The head of the organism is the Jewish entity, the
body is America.
The problem of the existence-duration of this Symbiosis is of
only secondary importance to Europe. No one predicted the
French Revolution in regard to its time or its form. No one
predicted the Russian Revolution of 1917, or the European
Revolution of 1933, or the American Revolutions of 1775 and
1933. No one can in any way presage the time or the form of a
Third Revolution in America which will take the power away
from the Jewish entity and place it in the hands of a new
American ruling-stratum.* That Revolution is an organic possi-
bility — indeed, even more: it is an organic Unavoidable. But
since the time of its outbreak is still an Imponderable, the
possibility of such a Revolution can play no role in the
formation of Europe's policy, for a policy cannot be based
upon Imponderables, though it must be flexible enough to
adapt itself when they emerge from the realm of the Unfore-
seen. When the Revolution starts, it will bring in America a
re-awareness of European politics and a re-evaluation of
\ Europe's meaning.
* Cf. IMPERIUM, p. 549 ff.
u
57
The Symbiosis of America and Jewry in this moment of
history between the Second and Third World Wars is decisive
not only for America, but also for Jewry. During the centuries
of its “dispersion,” the Jewish entity never attained to the
position of absolute sovereign over the fate of a Western
host-people. But now it has come to that, and Jewry has
identified itself for political purposes with America before all
the world. In that Jewry became the overlord of America, it lost
the most important of its other possessions and bases. Before
the Jewish hegemony over America, the height of Jewish power
was in Bolshevist Russia. In 1945, the superficial observer might
have gained the impression that the total political power of the
planet was being gradually collected into one political unit.
That was in fact the aim of the Jewish leadership, and the
means of creating the “world government” was to be the
resurrected “League of Nations.”
As has already been shown in IMPERIUM,* a world-state is
an organic impossibility, and likewise a logical one. State is a
political term, and political power results from polarity. A state
is thus a unit of opposition. Although in theory a world-state
would not have an opposition, if one were founded, it would at
that very instant split into two or more political units. These
would develop along regional, cultural, class, or economic lines
— even along the lines dictated by a dominant political figure.
Ignoring the concrete example of failure afforded by the
“League of Nations” after the First World War, the Jewish- Ame-
rican Symbiosis attempted through its “United Nations” to
create a power-monopoly for itself.
One great obstacle was present: Russia . It had been hoped,
even taken for granted, that Russia would remain sufficiently
under the control of the Jewish entity to collaborate in the
scheme and, together with America, formally surrender its legal
sovereignty to the “United Nations.” But the rise of the
American-Jewish Symbiosis undermined the position of the
fragment of the Jewish “diaspora” in Russia. So long as Jewry
acted alone, it was politically effective in Russia. The world-
wide identification of Jewry with America aroused Russian
nationalism, with the result that the Culture-alien Jewish entity
of Church-State-Nation -Society-Race lost its status as a mem-
ber, so to speak, of the Russian national structure and was
re-classified as a foreign element, thus losing completely its
political effectiveness inside Russia.
As we have seen, the sole great spiritual- Cultural “enemy”
Europe has is the Outer Revolt, against the West, the great
No to the Western World-Mission, and this Spiritual-Cultural
front is divided into two political units, of which Russia is the
second. Between the First and the Second World Wars, Russia
was generally acknowledged to be the leader of the Outer
Revolt, but in the Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1906, it was vice
versa. At that time, Russia figured as a Western power against
the Outer Revolt, which was led by Japan as the only sovereign
power outside the Western Culture. In between lies the
Bolshevist Revolution of 1917.
*
The Bolshevist Revolution was more than political; it was
Cultural. Power was tranferred from the Westernised elements
in the church, state, army, aristocracy, and intelligentsia to a
group basing itself upon the instinctively nihilistic stratum of
the Russian peasant masses. The primitive Russian Soul, unsure
of itself, had been forced by the Romanovs and the powerful
inroads of German culture in Russia to submit to Westernisa-
tion. Consequently, there arose in Russia a dreadful tension of
polarity between the two Souls, the Western and the proto-
Russian. Dostoievsky’s The Possessed depicts how it fermented
nihilistically beneath the surface. It was this underground
Russia that, led by the Jewish entity, broke away in 1917 from
the West. By 1923, the civil wars had ended, and Western
culture was for the time banished from Russia. A community of
destiny with Asia and its revolt against the West, rather than
with a Europe whose form-world it had just expelled from
Russian soil, more nearly answered the expectations of the new
Russia.
The Russian Soul is too virile ever to be strangled by
something alien. Hence the Jewish entity, despite the dominant
position to which it had attained with the Revolution of 1917,
was incapable of maintaining its unconditional rule. The
expulsion of Trotsky in 1928 marks the downward turning
point for Jewry in Russia.
And yet the Bolshevist Revolution did not eliminate the
59
* Cf. IMPERIUM, p. 166 f; 170 f.
58
Hi
S
s
s'
polar-tension within the Russian Soul. So long as the Russian
Soul, chaotic and full of longing, animated by a strong will yet
of weak resolve, exists within the sphere of influence of a
Western organism that is conscious of its World-Mission, there
will remain in Russia a powerful urge towards reunion with the
West. The European Revolution of 1933 found an echo in
Russia, and when the European armies entered Bolshevist
territory in 1941, they, were hailed everyplace there as
“liberators. ” Marshal Vlasov could have raised armies of
millions and affiliated them with the European military forces,
but, unfortunately, the European Command did not make use
of such aid until it was too late. The possibility indeed exists
that a second monstrous upheavel — with a pro-Western
Cultural aim — will overthrow the Bolshevist regime. This
possibility might be realised either through a renewed Western
invasion or through the appearance of a new Peter the Great. It
is a further Imponderable. Today Europe must reckon with
Russia as part of the Outer Revolt against its World-Mission.
Since there are only two political powers in the world, the
world situation can assume only the form of preparation for
war between them: America- Jewry versus Russia.
If Bolshevism is understood as the urge to destroy the
Western Culture, then these two extra-European powers form an
anti-Cultural Interregnum in Western History, the Concert of
Bolshevism. Both powers are formless and personal; neithei is
the expression of a superpersonal Soul, a higher Destiny, an
organically necessary Imperative to a World-Mission. The Outer
Forces, whatever the extent to which they have Western
technics at their disposal, whatever Western customs they
practise, whatever superficial display of literary connexions
with the West they make, are, in fact, to be classed in the same
category with the formless powers of Tamerlane and Genghis
Khan, Sun Yat-sen and Kemal Atatiirk, Lobengula and the
Mahdi. Europe is still the bearer of a World-Idea, a great
World-Hypothesis; it still has an inward necessity to view the
world in a particular fashion, an Ethic whereby it conducts
itself towards it in a particular fashion and reconstructs it in a
particular fashion. For the single, all-encompassing reason of
this total difference between Europe, on the one hand, and the
formless extra-European powers on the other, Europe can have
at bottom no interest in the projected Third World War within
60
the Concert of Bolshevism per se. Nor would it make any
difference in this if the War broke out in 1960 or 1975.
Nevertheless, Europe is linked politically to the projected
Third World War, and it must exploit every possibility in the
diplomatic preparations for that war to push through its
Liberation. Europe must recall its Destiny and its World-
Mission. It must assess the differences between the two powers
in the Concert of Bolshevism, and adapt itself so that it will
profit from their changing fortunes in the events to come.
Europe must form its policy.
61
1
THE DEFINITION OF ENEMY
As we have seen, the word “enemy” has a different meaning
when applied to Culture, private life, Politics. In the Cultural
sense, Europe has only one “enemy,” and that is the Outer
Revolt against the World-Mission of the West. It embraces all
primitive populations, even in those cases in which they live
geographically within the Western Culture, as in North and
South America, and includes all fellah-populations now inhabit-
ing areas where High Cultures once fulfilled themselves, for
example, the Islamic, Hindu, and Chinese populations. Likewise
it embraces populations in whose areas a High Culture has never
existed, for example, the barbaric Russians and Mongols, the
savages of Africa, South East Asia, and the Pacific islands. The
Jewish entity comes from the Magian Culture and will always
belong to it spiritually, that Magian Culture which during its
life-span gave rise to the Arabian, Persian, Nestorian, and Parsic
peoples, among others. While some of these entities may have
lost individuals to the West, alien units cannot be assimilated by
the West in their entirety. Superpersonal realities on both sides
forbid it. It is an organic impossibility. The world-wide Cultural
front against the West is divided into two political units, Russia
and America-Jewry, and the word enemy is used quite
differently in Politics.
Politics means so living life that its possibilities are exhausted.
In the course of events, Politics divides its world into political
friends and political enemies. Before Politics undertakes this
division, all outer units are potential enemies, and it is the task
of Politics to select one or more units as enemies, then, if
possible, to win the other units as friends.
The choice of enemy is the most important decision in the
entire realm of activity called Politics. The mighty En glis h
Empire, which dominated the world for more than a century,
foundered on its simple but profound mistake of choosing the
wrong enemy in two World Wars. The whole adroit ancillary
diplomacy, the total war-effort, and the military victory itself
did not succeed in preventing the disappearance of the greatest
Empire in history and the destruction of England’s own
sovereignty. The English homeland was not even spared the
ultimate humiliation of occupation by foreign troops, and, what
is more, these troops came from its erstwhile colony. The
62 '
formulation of policy is esoteric , and this is proved by the
selfsame example: Notwithstanding the collapse and disappear-
ance of the English Empire, notwithstanding the reduction of
England itself to the status of an “unsinkable aircraft carrier”
for foreign air-forces, the -Culture-retarding stratum and the
broad masses were successfully persuaded by foreign propagan-
da that a great “victory” had somehow been won for England.
Political blunders can be made at two levels: at the highest
level, where the enemy is determined and friends can be
obtained, or at the lowest, where the policy based thereupon is
carried out. The word error, in the strict sense, can be used in
Politics only with regard to the future. Thus one must reproach
England for choosing Germany as its enemy in the Second
World War when it was obvious that its choice was an error. The
great von Moltke defined strategy as “the art of making one less
error than your adversary.” This definition can be likewise
applied to Politics. Considered in retrospect, Life is a fabric of
errors. No one can foresee the Future.
Politics is concrete; it is the art of the possible, not of the
desirable, not of the moral, not of what is worthy of aspiration.
Politics is an art, and it is the grandest of all arts, since its
material is human life and its completed work the blossoming of
a superpersonal Destiny. When a work of art is executed by an
inferior, an imitator, an academic, the result is a piece of
bungling. The indispensable gift of the politician is the gift of
vision; after it comes finesse in political activity. Without prior
vision, the whole fateful proceeding comes to naught.
A statesman comes nearest to the gift of vision when he is
aware of his own strength of will and that of his people and
perceives the power-currents of the political world. A steady
adherence to both of these fundamentals will preserve him from
the far-reaching error of choosing the wrong enemy. It is
tantamount to waging war against oneself. In the Second W orld
War, England sacrificed both the remnants of its Empire and its
own independence for the benefit of America and Russia. There
are still people who would deny this fact, but only facts are
positive, not the sclerotic opinions of half-blind dotards.
The Political Genius is a superlative artist, and thus free of all
negativity in his creations. To his task he brings no hatred, no
63
malice, no envy, nor any will-to-destruction that does not serve
his will-to-power and will-to -creation. He is incapable of
pursuing a policy that is basically “anti "-oriented, for example,
a policy that has the slogan “Win the War!" as its “war-aim."
Such slogans may have certain propaganda value for the policy
of a political Genius, but only the shamelessly hate-filled
reactionary of the Churchill sort makes a policy of his hatred
and asserts that “victory" at the cost of self-destruction is
something worth seeking. Naturally, the political Genius re-
moves from his path all forces opposing him, so far as he can;
but this “anti"-tactic he employs for the sake of increasing his
power, not from jealousy, prejudice, hatred, or mere dislike.
The problem of choosing an enemy is the same for Europe
today, i.e., for the Culture-bearing stratum, as it would be for us
if Europe were constituted as an actual political unit. Today
Europe is an area and a People. If it pursues the right policy,
tomorrow it will be a power — * by virtue of its Inner Imperative
alone, which proceeds from the unfulfilled Destiny of the
Western Civilisation. The fact that Europe has a World-Mission
guaranteees that it will play a role in the centuries to come.
Whether this role will be an active one, or merely passive, will
become evident in our decades, and will be determined by the
policy of the European Culture-bearing stratum.
The choice of an enemy .is not arbitrary: We can designate a
political unit as enemy only if, first, we can overcome that
unit, and, second, by overcoming it gain power. Clearly, in this
second Interbellum-Period Europe cannot overcome any power
militarily because there does not and cannot exist a European
military force as long as Europe is not constituted as a sovereign
state. Any military force directly or indirectly under the
command of the Washington regime cannot be called a
“European military force." The nationality of an army is that
of its political leadership, not of its common soldiers or its
officer-corps. In these circumstances, Europe is compelled to
win power by spiritual-intellectual means. It must extract power
from one or both of the Outer Forces, Russia and America-Jew-
ry. That one of these two units from which Europe can draw
true political power, viz., unlimited control over its own land
and people, is the political enemy. It cannot be emphasised
enough that the enemy-definition does not entail, from the
European standpoint, any judgement of especially bad ethical,
64
moral, aesthetic, or cultural qualities on the part of the enemy.
Culturally, aesthetically, morally, ethically, there is no choosing
between Russia and America- Jewry. Yet , politically, Europe is
compelled to distinguish between them, by its organic necessity
to translate its Inner Imperative into action. It would be
impossible for Europe to play a passive role in History, even if it
wished, or it were wiser to do so. While Life advances, there is
no standing still.
The Definition of Enemy is a problem that must be solved in
the total historical frame-of-reference of our Epoch. Thereby
the power-currents of the century, the power-problems resulting
therefrom, and the relative danger for Europe must be
considered.
s
65
THE PO WER-PROBLEMS
OF THE SECOND INTERBELL UM-PERIOD
Owing to the false form of the first two World Wars and to
the presence of a Culture-disease in the Western Civilisation, the
power-problems in this period between the Second and the
Third World Wars are the same ones that have confronted
Europe for half a century, but now intensified to the highest
possible degree.
In the year 1914, the power-problems were the following:
how to preserve Europe’s world-hegemony and how to make
possible the conversion of Europe frojpi an accumulation of
petty-states with the hand-me-down world-outlook of a
nationalist-capitalistic parliamentarism to the determined shape
of Europe for the 20th century, viz,, an Authoritarian Socialist
structure of Culture-Nation-People-Race, the Imperium of the
West. The form of the First World War, shaped by Culture-retar-
ders like Grey, prevented a natural, organic solution of this
power problem.
Between the First and Second World Wars, important steps
were taken within Europe for the organic solution of the second
problem, the transition of the 20th century phase of the
European organism into the world of reality. Hardly anything
was done for the solution of the first problem, owing to the
precarious world situation at that time, although the Italian-
Abyssinian War did bring a general increase in power for
Europe.
But this organic move forward was halted by the meddling of
America- Jewry in intra-European affairs, and, as we have seen,
this meddling brought about, in the same sterile form as the
First World War, the tragedy of the Second World War. About
1939, the power-problems consisted in the re-establishment of
the world-hegemony that had been almost entirely destroyed by
the First World War, and in the completion of the half-
actualised Imperium of Europe. The Second World War,
occasioned by the extra-European, non-Western force of Ameri-
ca- Jewry and by the Churchills of France and England, once
again thwarted the organic solution of these two problems.
As a result of the Second World War, it can be seen that the
power-problems are essentially the same two. Only their order
of precedence has changed, so that now the problems are, first,
the Liberation of Europe from extra-European rule, for the
entirety of Europe is ruled from alien capitals; and, second, the
i fulfilment of Europe’s World-Mission, i.e., the reconquest of its
world-hegemony and the establishment of its World Empire.
| Every power-problem, contains a disjunction between the
distribution of spiritual power-sources, on the one hand, and
the distribution of acknowledged power and its attributes on
the other. The spiritual power-source — the possession of a
: World-Mission, a calling, a mighty, positive Inner Imperative,
and a nation-forming ethic — are found concentrated almost
entirely in Europe. The spiritual resources that exist outside
Europe, in Russia, America-Jewry, and Japan, are merely a
reflex of the European ~ a European Will that is inspired there
by Europe. In actuality, the Outer Forces are seeking to realise
the World-Mission of Europe, even though they lack the Inner
Imperative to it. Their motivation is completely negative.
Thereby is explained the circumstance that the immense
concentration of power in the Washington and Moscow regimes
has brought no Order to the world, that both regimes
perpetuate the Chaos left over in the 20th century from the
19th century. Only Europe can give back to this chaotic world
the Principle of Order.
66
67
THE AMERICAN PO WER-A CCUMULA TION
The American power-accumulation can be called an “empire”
only in a loose, transferred sense. 1 Within the Symbiosis
America-Jewry, neither the Jewish entity nor the subordinate
American element thinks in terms of American Imperialism.
Thus the American head-of-state specifically declared to the
populace that no people on earth was in any sense subject to
America, that America’s “defense” of other peoples did not
entitle it to demand reciprocity from them, and, moreover, that
under no circumstances would America “dominate” another
people. What is of particular significance in this is the
anti-imperialist ideology, not the fact that all these principles are
completely disregarded in the political conduct of America-Jew-
ry. The intention here is to prevent the rise of American
Imperialist thinking, for that would run counter to the
anti-nationalist policy of the dominant part of the Symbiosis.
But if the Imperialist urge within the American people were of
deep, imperative force, and pregnant with the Future, it could
not be suppressed, and the power-accumulation that the
Washington regime at present administers would be organised
into an American Empire.
However, a true American Empire that is hierarchically
organised and politically administered will never be, since it is
not among the formative possibilities of the American charac-
ter. Now, a nation cannot arise by happenstance — a people, yes
— but a nation is the outflowing of a High Culture.* Though
America can never belong to any other Culture than the
Western, in American life Western culture is only a veneer. Its
inward influence on the American population was too slight, for
example, to have prevented the invasion of Culturally-alien
units. There is no American Idea, no American nation, no
American ruling-stratum — three ways of expressing the same
thing. To be sure, there is an American People, whose members
are in fact characterised by an individual imperialism , which is
instinctive, racial, economic. But this individual imperialism can
never lift itself to political heights. The true American People is
a unit based upon matriarchy. By its own choice, it leads a
cocoon-like life within a closed system. The soul of this People
is too oriented to the feminine pole of existence, and it
* Cf. IMPERIUM,p. 328 ff., p. 334 ff., p. 398 ff.
68
therefore cherishes peace, comfort, security, in short, the values
of individual life. War, conquest, adventure, the creation of
form and order in the world — these do not interest the
American People. Empire-building demands sacrifices; yet, for
sacrifices to be made, and- not just sacrificial victims slaugh-
tered, there must be an Idea.
The American power-accumulation arose without sacrifices
through America’s chance intervention at two decisive moments
in world affairs. In the First World War, America’s sole war-aim
— according to the public and private utterances of all leading
Americans who were in favour of intervention in that War —
was to defeat “German tyranny.” As was shown in the analysis
of Politics in IMPERIUM, to have the defeat of an arbitrarily
chosen enemy as a “war-aim” is to have no war-aim at all. Thus
America had no political aim in that War. The role England
played in America’s entry into the War is not important here.
Important only is the stock of ideas that were played out to set
the American People in motion. In the Second World War,
America’s internal propaganda was exclusively non-political.
Again, the chief “war-aim” was to “defeat Germany,” and the
one attempt to display a positive “war-aim” was a series of
negative proposals — all of them reflecting the feminine values
of a matriarchy — to free the world of hunger, fear, etc. The
psychological orientation of the American People prevents
American governments in peacetime from clearly expressing a
demand for war. In wartime, it is obligatory to speak only of
“peace.” “Victory” is supposed to bring only “peace,” and not
an extension of power. Above all, the purpose of victory is not
an American Empire. After the extinction of the Federalist
Party in 1828, no political grouping in America publicly
advocated the creation of an American Empire. The average
type of party-politician ensures, however, that every public man
would advocate political imperialism were the idea popular.
The American power-accumulation in this epoch between the
Second and Third World Wars has arisen without sacrifice. Had
sacrifice been necessary for it, then it would not have arisen.*
Before 1914, America controlled only a small section of the
world-surface; the North American Continent, Central America
* Cf. IMPERIUM, p. 472 ff., p. 482 ff.
69
below Mexico, small areas of northern South America, Not even
the Caribbean Sea could be called American, since European
bases were numerous there and the American fleet was inferior
in number to more than one European fleet. In the First World
War, 10,000,000 men lost their lives on the battlefield. Of this
total sum America’s tribute amounted to 120,000; for this
slight toll in blood, America acquired sufficient new territories
and bases, obtained enough.power for itself at sea, to have l/5th
of the earth’s surface under its control: North America, the
whole of Central America, including Mexico, the entire Caribbe-
an, much of South America, and half the Pacific. After the War,
in accordance with the feminine-matriarchal orientation of the
American People, the greater part of these power-acquisitions
was abandoned — this occurred through the Washington Naval
Treaty of 1921, under- which America obligated itself to sink half
its fleet without demanding the equivalent from England or
Japan. Yet the fact remains: America acquired a power-area
that was four times larger than its original with the vanishingly
small blood-toll of 120,000.
By 1939, America had gained control, pari passu with the
steady decline of England’s power, of 1/5 of the earth-surface.
At the end of the Second World War, America controlled
18/20ths of it. That is the largest power-accumulation ever to
come about in the entire history of High-Cultures. The total
number of dead of all belligerent states amounted to approxi-
mately 15 million. America’s portion of this loss was 250,000.
In the Second World War, then, America acquired control of
more than half the world without its having to make a blood
sacrifice worth mentioning in connexion with such an opera-
tion.
Not even such unparalleled political successes fill the soul of
the American People with satisfaction. America, as a People, is
organic, and will forever remain isolationist. Isolationism is the
only American characteristic that can be called “nationalism.”
The American soul does not delight at all in this world power. It
finds in it no reason for pride. When in 1947 the Washington
regime calmly handed over China to Russia, that is, the focus of
America’s quarter of the world’s power, Americans- to ok no
notice. The diplomatic intermediary in the transfer was publicly
honoured and draped with medals. Only a few years after the
War, ships were taken from the American fleet and delivered to
70
Japan en masse to serve as the basis of a new Japanese havy. No
American nationalist protested, for in America there are no
nationalists, only victimised isolationists.
It is a strange phenomenon, and History will deal with it as
with so many other transient paradoxes, that between the
Second and Third World Wars American troops were stationed
all along the perimeter of the political world, viz., the northeast
quadrant of the planet, and this wide dispersion of American
armed forces did not involve any kind of national exultation for
Americans, The reason for that is Americans are primarily
economics-oriented. The Masculine Principle is to realise higher
ideas through art, warfare, Politics. Nothing could be further
from the American ideal than that. The Feminine Principle is to
nourish - and preserve life — that is the American ideal.
Americans therefore do not delight in an “empire” that
continually lays claim to their wealth and constantly demands a
reduction in their standard-of-living. In its traditional isolation,
America needed no armies, garrisons, subventions to foreign
countries, and Great Wars. The superficial politisation • of
America has brought the American People economic injuries,
and thus confirmed it in its isolation.
The American casualty list in the first two World Wars, slight
as they were numerically, hit the American People in a sensitive
spot. No mother rejoices in the death of her children, and
matriarchy informs the American soul, Americans do not love
their victories, whereas the deaths they count bitterly. Long
before American intervention in each of the two World Wars,
there was already a de facto state-of-war between America and
European or Asiatic belligerents. In each case, the possession of
numerous “allies” provided Americans with a certain solace. In
the Second World War, long lists of American allies were pub-
lished, and considered effective propaganda even though few of
the “allies” were still power-factors or even existed. Indeed, with
the alternative: war now with allies, or war later, standing alone ,
America can be forced into a war. The old European proverb:
VieV Feind y vieV Ehr finds no resonance in matriarchal America,
This American character-trait is a Ponderable of which
Europe must take account in shaping its policy, In the
American mind (and likewise in the policy-decisions of the
Culturally-alien Washington regime), Europe is the basis of
71
every war-plan against Russia. This Ponderable might be used by
Europe in either one or the other two ways, as will be shown
later. Moreover, Europe’s Culture-bearing stratum must keep in
mind that it does not matter at this time whether America, as a
People, can regain its independence and sovereignty or whether
it will remain simply the instrumental part of the Symbiosis
America-Jewry. For political purposes, America and Jewry have
become a unit; what name this unit receives is not important.
It remains for us to compare and evaluate from a political
standpoint the psychology of the two extra-European powers,
America-Jewry and Russia.
THE CONCERT OF BOLSHEVISM.
Neither Russia nor America-Jewry belongs to the Western
Civilisation, though America, considered abstractly in and of
itself, as it was before the Revolution of 1933, is still a
European colonial-people.
Hence there is no Cultural casus belli in the coming Third World
War between these two powers. They both belong to the Outer
Revolt against the world-supremacy of the West, and the
collective term for this revolt, which turns, destroying and
negating, against the creative affirmation of the Western
Destiny, is Bolshevism . Within the Concert of Bolshevism there
are, of course, differences as well as similarities. Both must be
evaluated.
With both world-powers, the reigning ideology comes from a
bygone Western world-outlook. The American ideology of
“freedom,” “equality,” and legalism stems from 18th century
Europe, as does its underlying philosophy of materialism. The
Russian ideology of Marxism comes from 19th century English
Capitalism, of which Marxism is a supplement. In Russia,
Marxism is treated as a religion , for the prime characteristic of
the Russian soul is its religiosity. Whatever this soul takes
seriously, be it even the absurd end-product of Western
materialism — Pavlovian reflexology, scientific psychology — , it
deals with in a religious way, that is, in a way transcending
action. Nowhere in Russian life is there anything that in any
way corresponds to the Marxist schema. The Russian soul, is
not yet politically mature, and Russia continues to use Marxism
as a political export article, even though a market for it no
longer exists, since the First World War buried the form-world
of the 19th century for ever, America-Jewry, which is similarly
maladapted to the New Age, exports to Europe the shop-worn
ideology of Montesquieu, Constant, Mill, Bentliam, and hopes
that on this basis it can turn the Destiny of Europe back two
centuries.
■ In America, on the other hand, Marxism is not a theory but a
fact. In the realm of facts, Marxism means class-war. America is
the classic, land of finance-capitalism and trade unions, the two
organised groups that systematically plunder the national
economy. Not only Marx, but all 19th century theorisers were
73
72
obsessed with economic doctrines — Malthus, Darwin, Mill,
Spencer, Shaw. American life is essentially oriented to econo-
mics, and every aspect of Life is simply referred for its
justification thereto.
Feminine-matriarchal life is routine; hence American life is
routine and technicised. Books instruct the population “How
To Win Friends,” how social life, family life, sexual life are to
be conducted. Yet this uniformisation of life is not perceived as
burdensome or ignominious— the American population is entirely
passive and feels quite at home in this atmosphere of a nursery.
The social instincts predominate over the individual instincts,
and every American child is taught from his earliest days that
the essence of leading a successful life consists in “getting along
with people.” There is no other way to realise this ideal than to
renounce one’s individuality. That is the explanation for the
difficulty of kindling any kind of political opposition in
America. As soon as a policy secures a foothold and becomes
popular, it is right and respectable. Radical or persistent
criticism is impossible in America; the term “individualist” is
nearly an . insult. The extirpation of strong individuality pre-
cludes the rise of a true elite, an aristocracy, a ruling-stratum,
for these are always based upon strong individuality and the
feeling of uniqueness. All feelings of superiority, of higher
self-esteem, of uniqueness are educated out of the American
while he is still in kindergarten. It is impressed on him that his
existence, his problems are exactly like those of everybody
else.*
An elementary demand of Life, however, is that every group
possess a stratified social articulation. America’s “elite” for
economic, technical, industrial, social purposes is the business-
class, those thirty-thousand technical-managerial brains that
permit American life to function. For political purposes, the
“elite” is the Jewish entity, which enjoys a monopoly of power
in all matters but is especially conspicious in the direction of
foreign affairs. The technical-managerial caste has no sense of
carrying out a mission; it does not regard itself as superior in
nature , but only as more proficient in intellectual-technical
matters. This type of social-technical differentiation resembles
that which exists among the social insects, for example, the bees
* Gf. IMPERIUM, p. 502 ff., p. 524 ff.
74
and ants.
Russian life is fundamentally barbarian. The barbarian is to
be distinguished not only from Culture-men, but from savages,
primitives, fellaheen, and decadents as well. Barbarian is a word
full of promise, for the barbarian is inwardly in motion. The
Germanic tribes that occupied Imperial Rome were barbarians,
and from this Germanic stock came, many centuries later, men
who wrought the Western Culture. The barbarian is the
pre-Cultural form of humanity, just as different from the fellah,
the end-product of a Culture, as from the savage, the proto-hu-
man type that stands in no relation whatever to a High Culture.
The barbarian is strong-willed yet irresolute. He can be readily
converted to new doctrines — witness the Russian “conversion”
to Marxism — , but the conversion must be superficial, for mere
verbiage cannot abolish the difference between Culture-man and
barbarian. The barbarian is rough and tough, not keen-witted,
full of artifice, and certainly not legalistic and intellectualised.
He is the opposite of decadent. He is ruthless and does not
shrink back from destroying what others may prize highly.
America’s ideology — 18th century .materialistic egalitarian-
ism and 19th century capitalism — and Russia’s ideology — 19th
century proletarian capitalism — are both permeated with the
spirit of their respective populations, the American ideology
with that of the amalgam of negro-Jewish-Asiatic-Indian-Euro-
pean elements, as modified by the peculiarities of the landscape,
the Russian ideology with that of the nomadic tribes of Asia,
which are imbued with the enormous impersonality of the
Asiatic steppes.
The Culture-man outside the Culture-sphere stands in danger
of losing his Cultural-orientation — what the British civil
administration in India used to call “going negative.” During the
expansion of the American population over the vast plains, the
American colonial lost well-nigh every contact with Western
tradition and Western happenings, and his Western culture was
diluted. Only in one part of America was there a successful
transplantation of Western culture, in the South, but it was
destroyed, for all practical purposes, by the victory of the
Yankees in the Secession War, 1861-1865. While the American *
lost his Western culture, step by step, he became primitive. Had
he fought a Culturally-alien world, such as the Chinese or
75
Hindu, he would have retained his Cultural-orientation in fullest
measure, for conflict with the Alien strengthens the Proper. But
he fought merely savages and, more often, the landscape itself,
the hardships of Nature. In the inward contest between Culture
and Landscape, Landscape was largely the victor. Because
comfort is one of the main ideals of the American, his vital
impetus finds expression primarily in the domain of technics.
Unrestrained by tradition, by political or social considerations,
he fell head over heels into absolute technical development , and
— in technics — he made his the foremost among the Western
Colonies. Thus, as a result of his century of state-less expansion,
the American succumbed, on the one hand, to the primitivity of
his vast and empty continent, while, as a result of the
concentration made possible for him by the absence of
power-struggles, on the other, he made himself in some respects
superior to Europeans. This had as its consequence yet another
peculiarity.
The simultaneous presence of primitivity and over-civilisation
in the American shaped his relationship to Europe into an
unhealthy one. With his strong technical aptitude, he came to
regard Europe as inferior ,' with his primitivity, he failed to
comprehend Europe’s Cultural Imperative in the 20th century.
Hence he offered no resistance when the Culture-distorting
regime foisted on America the idea that it had to educate
Europe.
This idea could be all the more inculcated since America is by
nature feminine-matriarchal and attributes great value to formal
education. In America the autodidact will find neither political,
academic, professional, nor social recognition. This peculiarity
of the American character has been aggravated by the Culture-
distorting element, and American schools and universities have
been made into scholastic factories that produce uniform
biological units. They have eradicated human individuality, so
far as that can be attained at all in the human species. All values
imparted through this “education,” such as comfort, security,
and social uniformity, may be found on the purely animal level
in man. None appeal to the specifically human level, which is
embodied at highest potential by the unique and individualised
human being, with his loftier values.
While the American is a Culture-man, reprimitivised on the
one side of his being, over-civilised on the other, since he is
completely and entirely animated by the ideals of peace,
comfort, and security, the Russian is a barbarian, and still
wholly primitive. Centuries of Petrinism never touched the
underground Russia. No. matter that it figured as such for
centuries, Russia never became a nation of the West. America is
a genuine Western colony, though, to be sure, it must now be
counted part of the Outer Revolt.
The orientation towards technics is common to both:
America is technical by instinct; Russia has become so under
compulsion from its leaders, who have only politico-military
reasons for embracing technics. In the field of philosophy, .
America’s sole contribution to the Western intellectual heritage
was Pragmatism — the doctrine that Truth is “what works.” In
other words, Truth is not a function of the Soul, but of Nature.
Pragmatism is at once a primitive and over-civilised philosophy,
primitive, because its position vis-a-vis Truth is devoid of higher
culture; over-civilised, because it makes all Truth merely an
attribute of Technics , Expressed in terms of the American
psychology: “True is what procures me more security, more
comfort.” In America, obsession with technics is the expression
and content of life of the population. It is instinctive , and
America naturally seeks to export it to whatever countries its
armies and bomber-squadrons have conquered. In Russia, on the
other hand, the technics-obsession merely serves political and
military ends, and is imposed on the Russian population only
through the apparatus of a political dictatorship. The Russian
experiences things primarily in a religious way; hence the
incredible spectacle of his worshipping a machine.
Russia exhibits the same education-obsession as America: In
the words of Lunacharsky: “Education, distributed according
to Marxist principles, can make even the most mediocre
Oriental intelligent.” Once again, a common denominator with
America. There, too, “intelligence” is regarded as something
that can be acquired, and, moreover, as the only distinction
between human beings. Both Russia and America hold that the
External forms and conditions the mind. Both emphasise totally
environment and experience, negate dogmatically Spirit and
Soul. For both the collective man is the ideal and the prevalent
type. In both there naturally exists the most extreme in-
tolerance towards anything other than the mass-ideal.
76
77
In Russia, the craze for uniformity, including the education-
mania, is likewise imposed from above to carry out a political
programme. The emphasis on the power of environment, the
adoration of reflexology, the idolisation of machines, of
statistics and percentages, and of economic theories generally
all this is in Russia simply technique , and it is all essentially
negative: the Russian peasant-barbarian soul is a religious
ferment, and, as such, abhors economic theories, machines,
science, and nationalism. The programme of Moscow-Bolshe-
vism represents a means of quashing the hyper-individuality of a
people of Pugachevs, Aksakovs, Kropotkins, Nechayevs, Dosto-
ievsky s, Rasputins, and Skoptsy . Primarily , Moscow -Bolshevism
is a method for politicising the religious-barbarian Russia. That
the Moscow regime uses Marxism as an export-article is simply
political idiocy, and the possibility constantly exists that it will
one day discard it because of its ineffectiveness.
For Europe the following distinction is important: Ameri-
can-Jewish Bolshevism is the instinctive destruction of the West
through primitive, anti-Cultural ideas — peace, comfort, securi-
ty, abolition of individuality — , through over-technicisation,
through the imposition of Culture-distortion and Culture-retar-
dation. Russian Bolshevism seeks to attain the destruction of
the West in the spirit of pan-Slavic religiosity, i.e., the
Russification of all humanity.
Thus American- Jewish Bolshevism poses a real spiritual threat
to Europe. In its every aspect, American- Jewish Bolshevism
strikes a weak spot in the European organism. Even in Europe
there exists a stratum, the Michel-stratum, the inner- America,
which is animated by the purely animal American ideal of
peace, comfort, security, abolition of individuality. Even in
Europe there is an element that would like to replace culture
with machinery. Even on Europe Culture-retarding regimes can
be imposed, if necessary with American bayonets. Even in
Europe Culture-distortion is present: the dictature over Europe
of the American-Jewish Symbiosis itself. And even in Europe, in
the midst of the Age of Absolute Politics, the Cato-type exists:
You can watch him babbling, misty-eyed, about democratic
ideals while the Barbarian and the Distorter occupy the sacred
soil of the West. The 20th century European Cato would rather
see the West destroyed than have finally to toss the rubbish of
democratic ideals on the scrap heap of history, where the corpse
78
of Democracy lies stinking and putrescent after a half century
of decay.
Russian Bolshevism is simply barbarism, and therefore finds
no resonance anywhere in Europe. Even Europe’s lowest
spiritual stratum, the inner traitor, the Michel-stratum, has
nothing whatever in common with the pan-Slavism of barbaric
population-streams. Russian religiosity has been temporarily
and, from a Cultural standpoint, falsely raised to political
intensity as a reflex of the great Western spiritual development,
the Resurgence of Authority, the genesis of the Imperium-Idea.
Without the Western Culture, there would be no such structure
as Russia, only marauding tribes of barbaric horsemen like the
Cossacks in Taras Bulba .
Russian Bolshevism is therefore less dangerous to Europe
than American-Jewish Bolshevism, for no aspect of its menace
corresponds to a weakness in Europe’s spiritual armour. Europe
actually has an inner America, the Michel-stratum; however,
Europe has no inner Russia. Obviously, the so-called Com-
munist Parties are not at all the reliable tools wherewith a
Russian occupation of Europe could be built. In fact, the work
of these Communist Parties is already done. They were useful
instruments of early Bolshevism’s foreign policy, especially in
the period 1933-1939. During the Second World War, they
helped save Russia’s existence as a political unit; after the War,
they helped create the Russian power-accumulation, extending
from Hanover to Hong-Kong, the largest contiguous power-
accumulation in the history of the world. Yet, today, between
the Second and Third World Wars, all Communist Parties,
including the American, are politically insignificant.
The Communist Parties of the West are simply class-war
units, not bearers of barbarism and Russian pan-Slav national-
ism. In the 20th century, all are forced to think in terms of
facts and not merely words, so far as Politics is concerned, and
Russia’s connexion with Western class-war rests simply on
words. Russia claims to be the bearer of class-war in the West.
Nevertheless, during the Second World War the Moscow regime
forbade the American Communist Party to engage in class-war-
• fare. Actually, the entire policy of using Marxism as a political
export-article is now political stupidity, for Marxism has lost its
former rabble-rousing value in the West. The highpoint of
79
class-wax in the West has passed.
In particular, it was the re- orientation of Russian World-poli-
cy after the Second World War, the turning against the Jewish
entity of Church-State-Nation-People-Race, that sealed the
doom of every Communist Party in the West, the one in-
America included.
The blow that the American- Jewish Symbiosis has dealt the
European organism is well-known. The values of this Symbiosis
are purely animal, anti-Spiritual, anti- Aristocratic, anti-Cultural,
anti-Heroic, anti-imperialist, and therefore appeal to the worst
element in the European population and to the worst in every
individual European; In each point of its attack, America-Jewry
opposes the values of Capitalism to those of Imperialism, the
heroic world-outlook of the Age of Absolute Politics, With the
spiritual-ethical values of Capitalism, America-Jewry is planning
to kill the Western organism. But since the Past can never
destroy the Future, only attempt to thwart it, that means
American bayonets imposing the anti-Cultural Interregnum on
Europe, and therein lies the possibility that for Europe will
follow many decades of degradation, chaos, darkness, stultifi-
cation, misery, and wasting away.
The effect that a Russian occupation of Europe would have
on the Western Culture is not yet equally well-known, and can
be determined only by uncovering its organic basis.
The Russian is a barbarian; the European is a Culture-man in
his late-Civilisation phase. Before this moment in History,
barbarians have violently invaded Culture-areas. In the 16th
century B.C., Northern barbarians invaded the Egyptian Cul-
ture-petrifact, to enact the chapter of history that is called the
“Hyksos”-era. About 1700 B.C., the Kassites conquered and
occupied the Babylonian Culture-area, and, around the same
time, the Aryans in a barbaric wave from the North flooded
into and conquered the Culture of the Indus, Chinese history in
its first stirrings is the epic of a barbarian invasion by the Chou.
Imperial Rome — even Republican Rome — was invaded more
than once by the barbarian Germans and Gauls. In none of
these historical instances did the invasion of the barbarians
destroy the body of the Culture; in each case the result was
finally the absorption of the barbarian elements into the
80
Culture-body or their expulsion. The barbarian comes to
destroy and stays to learn. Spiritually, the barbarian is a tabula
rasa . Labile and childlike, he is eager to apply the new
doctrines, new life-forms, to which he has been converted.
Hence the Romanov Petersburg of the 18th and 19th centuries
displayed a higher degree of Western Politesse and social-form
than any European capital before it.
The belief that a Russian-barbarian occupation of the whole
of Europe would be similar to the Russian occupation of half of
Germany after the Second World War is a completely false
estimate of the possibilities. A Russian occupation of all Europe
would involve an entirely different distribution of forces and a
completely different psychological situation. In the first place,
the Russian occupation after the Second World War originated
as a gift from America. Cynically, Europe’s border against Asia,
which had been pushed back gradually over a millenium, was
restored to its place of 900 years ago. Thus the history, honour,
and traditions of thirty generations of Europeans were out-
raged. The atrocities committed during the first years of the
Russian occupation were permitted, encouraged, and even
imitated by America. Without American encouragement, Russia
would not have been in the position to commit its atrocities. In
the second place, Europe was not politically able to intervene to
protect 30,000,000 Europeans, for every European country was
governed by the churchill-regimes the Americans had appointed,
and these puppet-governments greeted barbarian Russia as their
“valiant ally” while their members exchanged decorations with
those of the Moscow regime.
Russia’s occupation of a small part of Europe and its
domination over one tenth of the European population after
the Second World War were made possible only by the
Washington regime, which, in 1945, wanted Europe so divided
that the Red Flag would wave over Berlin and Vienna. If the
Washington regime, instead of giving Russia simply a small part
of Europe, had abandoned to it all of Europe — and that is a
possibility contained in the events -o come — , the division of
forces would be completely different. Instead of America-
Jewry, the whole of Russia, Eastern Europe, and most of
Western Europe — under churchill-regimes — ranged against part
of Germany, then against 200,000,000 Russians, would be
arrayed the total body of the West, 250,000,000 men who are
superior to them in intelligence, technical skill, organisational
81
talent, and will-to-power. If this happens, America will be
expelled from Europe, once and for all. Europe will have but a
single enemy. That would be a unifying factor such as did not
exist from the First Crusade until Lepanto.
A Russian occupation would develop along one or the other
of two lines. The first possibility is an endless series of
European uprisings against Russia that could result only in the
expulsion of the demoralised barbarians. The second possibility
would result from Russia’s introducing a clever regime and
according Europe extensive autonomy and magnanimous treat-
ment. Within a few decades, this Europe would naturally aim at
infiltrating horizontally the whole Russian seat of origin, its
technical, economic, social, and, finally, military and political
life. Instead of the Russification of Europe, as Dostoievsky and
Aksakov dreamt of it, would result the Europeanisation of
Russia once again, and this time in far stronger degree. This
would occur from pure historical necessity , since this is the Age
of Absolute Politics and Europe is politically shrewd whereas
barbarian Russia is formless and politically inept, fluctuating
between senseless vehemence and inner doubt. Not even the
most brilliant statesmen in Russia could use this barbarian
material to subjugate Europe in this Imperialist stage of its
Destiny. An attempt by Russia to integrate Europe into its
power-accumulation peacefully would eventually result in the
rise of a new Symbiosis: Europe-Russia. Its final form would be
that of a European Imperium, An attempt by Russia to chastise
and terrorise Europe without the help of America would result
in Russia’s expulsion from Europe for good, by a Europe whose
own dormant barbarian instincts had been thus reawakened.
If Russia should occupy Europe and attempt to imitate the
American policy of encouraging petty-statism, to divide and
conquer, it would fail utterly. America has been successful in
that policy only because of its access to the European
Michel-stratum with its lickspittle Churchills. The Michel yearns
for American capitalism and liberalism, but trembles with
abyssmal cowardice before Russian barbarism. The Communist
Parties would be of slight use to Russia in any attempt to set up
puppet-governments on the model of America’s churchill-
regimes. The leadership and membership of these Communist
Parties is composed of inferior European types, not of pan-Slavs
or religious Russian nationalists. The barbarian, immature and
82
unversed in the subtleties of the art of Politics, trusts only those
who are of his own religion, and the true religion of the Russian
is not Marxism, but Russia. The first victims of a Russian
occupation of Europe would be the European Communists,
who would be liquidated at the slightest suspicion of disloyalty.
Their “Communism” stems from books, their pro-Russian
sentiments from hatred and envy of their European surround-
ings, their utopian orthodoxy about Russia comes from a lack of
realism and an exaggerated intellectualism. The Russian knout
and the Russian revolver would soon teach them what they have
not learnt from their books, would shatter their utopian ideals
and give their hatred a new focus.
Russia’s effect on petty-statism and petty-nationalism would
in no way resemble America’s successful perpetuation of these
Culture-pathological phenomena. To carry out its policy in
Europe, America needs petty-statism. Not only does it work in
the spirit of the principle, divide et impera , it also cannot think
outside the narrow framework of it. After the Second World
War, the Washington regime, which held absolute power to
force its will on enfeebled Europe, announced its policy of a
“united Europe.” It then proceeded to Balkanise Europe
politically and atomise it socially in unparalleled fashion.
Numerous congresses of toothless and infantile old men from
the, 19th century passed even more numerous resolutions, but
the result was continued disunity and chaos. The childish
dotards had received permission from Washington to jabber
about the “unification” of Europe as much as they liked, but
they were not allowed to say a word about the Liberation of
Europe. That is why all these congresses led to nothing. For the
Unification of Europe and the Liberation of Europe are one and
the same process: seen from within, it is Unification; from
without, liberation.
The fact that Russia used the fiction of “independent” states
in its post-War occupation of Eastern Europe offers no criterion
for its policy in the event it should occupy Western Europe, the
Europe that is ‘synonymous with the Western Culture. In any
case, simply the presence of the barbarian, let alone his policy,
would dissolve the Inner Enemy of Europe, the Michel-stratum,
and thus liberate all creative forces within Europe from the
*
tyranny of the Past.
83
Without the Michel, without his leaders, namely the Chur-
chills, without American bayonets, the distribution of forces
would be as follows: the European will-to-power and the
European Destiny against the sheer military might of a
barbarian horde. The dissolution of the Michel-stratum would
automatically destroy petty-statism, for petty-statist ideals and
theories are preserved only in Culture-retarding brains. The
barbarian, whether he wished it or not, would complete the
spiritual unification of Europe by removing the only inner-
European obstacle to that unity. From the Spiritual to the
Political is but one step.
The following would be the results of the two possible kinds
of Russian policy, the far-sighted policy of striving to integrate
Europe into an enormous Russian Empire, embracing the whole
world, and the policy of attempting to rule Europe by terror
and violence.
Should Russia aim at a lasting incorporation of Europe into
its Empire, it could succeed only if it granted Europe significant
concessions. The first of these would have to be administrative
autonomy for Europe as a unit, for that is the desire of all
Europeans — the Michel-stratum and its leaders, the senile
Churchills, of course, excepted.
Should Russia attempt to terrorise Europe, it would summon
forth in the European People the will to counter-terror. Faced
with the barbarian, all Europeans, even the simplest minded
liberals, would learn the necessity of inner firmness, of a stem
will, the virtues of Command and Obedience, for these alone
could force the barbarian to accept demands, or else retreat to
his tundras and steppes, All Europeans would realise that not
parliamentary babble, class-war, capitalism, and elections, but
only Authority, the Will-to-Power, and finally, the military
spirit could ever drive out the barbarian. The expulsion of
England’s army of 40,000 men by a few hundred Irish
guerrilla-fighters in the years 1916-1923 would be repeated on a
larger scale. In a great, unrelenting War of Liberation, Europe
would unite itself, and cast the barbarian back to the distant
plains of Asia.
To conclude: Between the two powers in the Concert of
Bolshevism that dominates this Second Interbellum-Period,
8 4
there are numerous similarities, some profound, others super-
ficial. Neither of the two is an organism with a positive Mission;
neither of the two exhibits the inner qualities that alone can
found and preserve a world-system; neither of them has or can
have an aristocracy; in short, neither of them is the seat of a
High Culture. In both the element of Landscape predominates
over the cultural component in every stratum of the human
material; both make use of an antiquated Western ideology that
is completely ineffectual in the world-situation of the Age of
Absolute Politics; both have not the faintest inkling of the
Imperium-Idea, the necessary , fulfilment whereof is the total
historical meaning of this Age; both believe it possible to attain
a static world-order in which History would have ceased to
•exist, and this belief makes both dangerously relentless; both
believe Europe can be destroyed as a politico-Cultural unit, and
degraded to the level of China.
Thus, from the European standpoint, there is in a Cultural
sense no choice between these two powers, for both represent
fundamental opposites to European Cultural imperatives.
In their political relation to Europe, however, the two
extra-European ppwers widely and fundamentally differ. Owing
to the presence of a European inner America, the Washington
regime is able to establish or maintain in every European
country: Culture-distortion, petty-statism, finance- capitalism,
democracy, economic distress, and chaos. Regardless of its
intentions, Russia produces a spiritual aversion throughout
Europe, If America, deliberately or otherwise, relinquished to
Russia the whole of Europe, Russia’s occupation would have to
be based either on terror or large-scale concessions to procure
collaboration. Both occupation policies would end in the
domination of Russia by Europe, either through a peaceful
inner conquest or a series of Liberation Wars that Europe would
wage as a unit against Russia. Barbarian Russia can only awaken
Europe’s sterner instincts. The American-Jewish Symbiosis,
composed of fellah- Jews and American colonials who are at
once primitive and over-civilised, appeals to the lowest stratum
of .Europe and to the lowest stratum in every European, the
stratum of animal instincts, laziness, cowardice, avarice, dis-
honour, aqd ethical individualism.
America can only divide Europe— no matter what its
policy.
85
Russia can only unite Europe— no matter what its policy.
From their comparative relationships to Europe, it follows
quite clearly that a Russian-barbarian domination of all Europe,
if such a thing were brought about by American policy— and
that is the only way such an event could occur — would be less
injurious to the Destiny of Europe than a continuation of the
American-Jewish domination, for the barbarian, by his very
presence, would dissolve the Inner Enemy of Europe, the
Michel-stratum, and unite Europe spiritually.
This brings us to the concrete question of political decisions
for Europe. The political question would be: How is power to
be enlarged? But since Europe has no power, the question is:
How is power to be obtained? There are only two political
units in the world; hence the question is simply: From which
political unit can Europe wrest away power? Or in other
words: Who is the Enemy?
THE POLITICAL ENEMY OF EUROPE
The armistice that concluded the Second World War left
Europe divided between Russia and America- Jewry. Russia
received ten per cent of Europe’s population, America-Jewry
was allotted ninety per cent. By Europe is meant here, of
course, the Cultural Europe, viz., Germany, France, England,
Italy, Spain, together with tiny provinces like Switzerland, and
not the geographic “Europe” that is an historically worthless
concept.
The Washington regime naturally seeks to convince its
European subjects to identify the interests of America-Jewry
with their own and therefore prepare Europe for war against
Russia in alliance with it. The propaganda that aims at enlisting
Europe’s participation in this war has three main points: first,
Russia is not a “democracy”; second, it “enslaves” other
peoples; third, a Russian occupation of Europe would result in
the slaughter of the whole European population or a consider-
able part thereof.
The first point is politically meaningless, nor is the second
point worth taking seriously. To enslave two hundred and fifty
million people who are spiritually, ethically, scientifically,
technically, militarily, and politically the most highly developed
in the world is impossible. So far as Europeans can be enslaved
at all, they are already enslaved by America-Jewry. Today the
people of Europe work with every possible exertion for the
enrichment and aggrandisement of the financiers, industrial-
barons, politicians, and generals of North America. Slavery no
longer means the rattling of chains, rather shortages of currency
and materials, rationing, unemployment, occupation soldiers
and their families, puppet-governments, re-armament and mili-
tary programmes on a gigantic scale.
The third point seeks to frighten Europeans into a war to
destroy America-Jewry ’s sole dynamic opponent, thus placing
the masters of New York and Washington in control of the
entire world. But again, to kill a considerable part of the
European population through short-term violent measures
would be. impossible. The well-planned and systematically
executed starvation of Germany by the American-Jewish
occupation during the period 1945-1948 killed approximately
87
86
3.000. 000 people. That is probably the largest number of
people that could have been killed by such methods. Over-
heated brains that could be persuaded that Europe “killed
6 . 000 . 000 Jews” can readily imagine the course a Russian
massacre of hundreds of millions of human beings would take.
People who believe in such nightmares lack a sense for 1
exaggeration, and their psychology is entirely wanting. No great
number of men can be trained to kill, directly and systematical-
ly, as a daily performance, from morning till evening, over an
extended period, unarmed men, women, and children. Certain-
ly, the mere sporadic killing of the kind involved in every
military invasion could never reduce the population of Europe
to any great extent.
If a selective killing should be the method in an attempt to
behead the European organism, then Russia would be likewise
incapable of that. This was the method of the American- Jewish
“war-crimes” programme, the most extensive terror in the
history of the world. America- Jewry attempted to isolate the
elite and string up its members one by one; but there, too, it
missed the mark. Russia did not practise any systematic
“war-crimes” terror, in spite of encouragement on the part of
America-Jewry, since it was more interested in individuals as
material for the Future than in settling past accounts according
to Mosaic Law. Furthermore, the American Colonials and their
exotic leaders understand much better than the barbarian how
to go about isolating and exterminating superior individuals, for
the inner structure and cohesion of the Western Culture are
much less familiar to him and much less understood by- him. A
profound ignorance of the outside world goes hand in hand
with Russian xenophobia.
America-Jewry insists that Russia could overwhelm Europe—
quite mechanically and automatically— were not American
colonial troops here. Yet the fact remains that only America’s
intervention in the Second World War prevented Europe from
destroying Russia as a political unit. The present Russian
power-accumulation was thus created by America-Jewry, Never
in the five centuries of Russian history has Russia been able to
make way into Europe unless supported by one or more
European states. Against Frederick the Great Russia received
aid from France, Austria, and Sweden; against Napoleon Russia
received aid from England, Austria, Prussia, Sweden, and Spain.
88
In 1945, Russia penetrated into Germany only with America’s
assistance. Before American intervention, Europe had hurled
the barbarian back across the Volga. Russia is a threat only to a
divided Europe; a united Europe could destroy the power of
Bolshevist Russia at the moment of its choosing. That Europe
has need of America-Jewry to defend itself against Russia is a
crass lie.
Only America can grant Russia entry into Europe; this was
true in 1945, and will be just as true in 1967 or : 1975. There are
two ways in which America-Jewry could deliver Europe to a
Russian-Bolshevist occupation: by voluntarily making Russia a
gift of it, as it did with China in 1947, or by losing a war against
Russia from European bases.
In any case, Europe— that means here above all the Culture-
bearing stratum— will choose its own enemy because the
250,000 men who are mystically charged with fulfilling the
Destiny of Europe are by nature inwardly free of Culturally-
alien influences. Enemy propaganda, however great its extent
may be, cannot frustrate the Destiny of a High Culture, for that
Destiny is above mechanism and technics, and propaganda is
simply a technique. An enemy occupying Europe can probably
round up herds of civilians by means of its puppet-governments
*
and call the result an army, but beyond that it cannot go. An
army means, first, morale; second, an officer-corps; third, a high
command; and, fourth, the human material of the troops. A
herd of civilians conscripted under foreign coercion would
possess no morale and have no European officer-corps and
European high command. Without these, they would be only an
armed mob, and, as such, not a formidable match for the
barbarians.
We have seen that it is a deep spiritual need of the
matriarchal American People to have many and strong allies in a
war; and of the ruling-stratum in America it must be remarked
that the rider is always limited to the abilities of his mount. We
have also seen that Europe is the basis for America’s every
war-plan against Russia. Europe may be able to exploit these '
facts.
To secure the collaboration of Europe in the war it is
planning against Russia, America would grant Europe huge
89
concessions— in inner autonomy, in commerce, in military
affairs, and even in administrative unification. But since
America has the Michel-stratum at its disposal, and this stratum
holds office everywhere in Europe, no demands are put to it.
Thus the Washington regime can treat Europeans as something
less than peons— peons at least receive a wage . The churchills of
every country make no demands lest they disquiet the
American bayonets upon which their tenure of office depends.
To expect pride and independence from the stratum of
professional traitors is simply unrealistic.
The second way in which the American People’s spiritual
need to have allies who might be exploited would be through an
unswerving, voluntary, neutralisation of Europe vis-a-vis the
projected war against Russia. Once the Washington regime was
forced to accept European neutrality as a fact, it would have to
abandon its plans for a European theatre- of -war and evacuate
Europe.
Either of these possibilities, if realised, could bring about the
Liberation of Europe before the Third World War. The first
possibility could be realised only if the Michel-stratum were
removed from public life, for the churchills would scarcely
place Europe’s interests above their class and personal interests,
which are protected only .by the foreign occupation.
To act creatively in Politics, one must begin with the right
choice of enemy. If one selects an enemy from whom one can
win no power, the end-result is suicide, as we saw with the
self-destruction of the English Empire in the Second World War.
Were Europe actually to fight for an enemy, that would be
proof that Europe had in fact died, but the continuing mystical
relation between the European Culture-bearing stratum and the
European population would prevent Europe from doing so.
Should the Third World War occur, Europe will participate in it
only on its own terms. That is an absolute mystical certainty.
Perhaps a herd of hapless conscripts without morale, without
European officers and a European high command, can be
thrown on the battlefield to fight for an enemy, but that would
hardly be European participation worthy of the name.
All this has long since answered the question: Who is the
Enemy ? The enemy must be a political unit at whose expense
90
we can gain power. Am erica- Jewry has the power in Europe,
and if Europe would win back its sovereignty, it can do so only
at the expense of America-Jewry. Politics is concrete, and thus
the argument that Russia wishes to conquer Europe has but
little force. Perhaps India would like to do that as well, but
Europe must reckon on facts and not on threats. America has
the power in Europe, and, therefore, America is the Enemy.
s I
Two facts dominate the politics of Europe in this historical
period: Europe will never fight for its Enemy; Europe will
survive the Third World War and its aftermath, regardless of the
newweaponry.
These are metaphysical facts; they possess Destiny value and
cannot be removed by human action. They correspond to all
life-furthering, life-affirming, power-increasing instincts of the
European People, to the superpersonal Destiny of the Western
Culture. In view of these facts, the enemy propaganda of the
Russian bogey can be called simply idiotic. America-Jewry is
the bearer of the Russian menace, today, as in the Second
World War. If it brings about a Russian occupation of all
Europe, then all Europe will persevere and overcome that
happe nin g. Should America be expelled from Europe before the
Third World War, the form of the war would be completely
different. Instead of America-Jewry versus Russia, it would then
be the European Imperium versus Russia, and in that form the
war would end in the destruction of Russia as a political unit.
For the European Imperium, the result would be external
■ security for the coming centuries. Should America attempt to
intervene, as before, this time its efforts would be of no avail,
for the European Imperium will naturally include England and
Ireland. It was only America’s 'fortuitous possession of those
bases that enabled it to stab Europe in the back during the
Second World War. From North America or Africa, America-
Jewry could do little or nothing to help Russia.
The Age is mighty and its tasks enormous, but if we hold fast
to our honour and pride, harken to our own instincts and the
Inner Imperative, we will win the upper hand in every instance.
Although the opponents are gigantic, they are formless; behind
their patchwork power-accumulations is a spiritual void which,
like a vacuum, will draw back their dispersed forces. Neither
America-Jewry nor Russia is a structure inwardly adapted to the
91
Age of Absolute Politics. The American People is matriarchal,
isolationist, and interested only in economic matters. When the
power-adventures at the antipodes run into too much money or
demand real blood-sacrifice, the Washington regime will no
longer be able to force it to tread the false path of senseless
World Wars. In the World War, Germany lost 739 Generals,*
whereas America had the death of a single General to mourn.
This fact just symbolises the truth that America has enjoyed
success without having to pay the price of it. The moment the
adventures become too costly, the Washington regime will have
to retreat, for even its “victories” mean nothing to the
American People. An apolitical people cannot win an enduring
political victory; it does not need it, or want it, or even know
how it would use the power proceeding from it.
The Russian barbarian does not understand power; he has no
knowledge of the meaning of this Age. Neither the half-
Westernised Bolshevists nor the pure-Asiatic masses possess the
qualities needed to build an empire. The spiritually unadultera-
ted Russian, whose limitations are binding for the Moscow
regime, is religious , hence inward; he is rural and land-hungry,
but there is no nobility and no religion in Russia that attend to
his material and spiritual cares. Marxism is a collection of dead
and sterile phrases, and can no more strongly inspire the
Russian than it can the European. Pan-Slav religiosity does not
seek an empire; with it an empire cannot be built.
This is the Age of Absolute Politics, and its meaning is the
fulfillment of the Destiny of the Western Civilisation; the
formation of the European Imperium and the actualisation of
its World-Mission, In this Age, a power that would impose its
will on the world must be endowed with the inner qualities that
alone can establish and maintain a world-system, the qualities of
the Spanish Europe in the 16th century, the English Europe in
the 18th and 19th centuries, the Prussian Ethical Socialist
Europe in the 20th century, which will survive the 21st century.
The one, great, all-embracing quality that is absolutely neces-
sary for such a task is the consciousness of a Mission. That
cannot come from human resolves; it can come only as the
emanation of a superpersonal soul, the organ of a higher
Destiny, a Divinity. The American-Jewish and Russian ideas of
negative world-conquest are but vague caricatures of the true,
Western European Idea of Imperium Mundi , a travesty of
92
History on the world-stage.
f
Europe recognises its Cultural enemies and its sole political
enemy. Thus it sees the only path it can follow. The basis of
Europe’s politics is faith in but under no circumstances fear of
the Future. If we follow now the path that our instincts, our
intelligence, and our Inner Imperative have prescribed, whatever
befalls us shall be good . For us there is but one crime, one
misdemeanour, and one mistake: that is to be untrue to
ourselves and follow alien leaders and hold alien ideals,
Europe also recognises its Inner Enemy: Whosoever pursues
another policy than that of a sovereign Europe, whether this be
the policy of America-Jewry or Russia, is the Inner Enemy.
Petty -statists and petty-nationalists sink to the level of spies and
foreign agents. Loyalty to Europe excludes every other political
loyalty. No European owes the petty-state of his birth any
allegiance whatever, for all these tiny erstwhile-states are now
simply anti-European tools in the hands of our Enemy, the
Washington regime.
Europe is equal to its historic task. Against the anti-spiritual,
anti-heroic “ideals” of America-Jewry, Europe pits its metaphy-
sical ideas, its faith in its Destiny, its ethical principles, its
heroism. Fearlessly, Europe falls in for battle, knowing it is
armed with the mightiest weapon ever forged by History: the
superpersonal Destiny of the European organism. Our European
Mission is to create the Culture-State-Nation-Imperium of the
West, and thereby we shall perform such deeds, accomplish such
works, and so transform our world that our distant posterity,
when they behold the remains of our buildings and ramparts,
will tell their grandchildren that on the soil of Europe once
dwelt a tribe of gods.
93
(
w
■■ill
, A *
wsa-:.
v lit *■• 7 ; .
. PLEASE
help us expose
THE BIGGEST
JEWISH LIE!
PLEASE
help us spread
THE TRUTH!
• - ■ ^ ■
Order copies of
THE HOAX OF THE
20th CENTURY
by Prof* A.R. Butz
paperback, 315 pages
at these prices:
l/$6.00-3/$15.00
10/$45.00— 100/$400.00
The “Holocaust”— fact or fiction?
Were six million Jews really
gassed ... or has a colossal hoax
been perpetrated on the world?
Professor Arthur Butz has carefully investigated the alleged
extermination of 6,000,000 Jews during World War II and has
written a book which thoroughly documents his startling findings*
His book strips away the cover of fraud and deceit from this
emotion-charged topic and lays bare the full and complete truth.
THE HOAX OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY $ 6.00
plus 60 cents for postage and handling.
Order from
!.IICi:iM Y ISi:i l, IMIltMCATIONS
P.O. BOX 21, REEDY, W.VA. 25270 USA
I
(
i LETTERS TO THE EDITOR, continued from page 6
k when it comes to the truth. In fact, this is my husband’s motto and mine
t second-hand -- the truth is the most important thing no matter where you
might find it.
| After going through the fundamental churches and then through .the
Kingdom Israel Identity churches (some of which aren’t much different
from the fundamentals in their dogmatism) with questions and doubts in
■v the back of our minds that we did not even know how to vocalize, we are
h relieved and excited to hear others express those doubts and seek solutions
#;;;*• with an open, searching mind, unafraid of the consequences, even
: welcoming them.
We can’t say we agree with everything written in your publication. How
could we or anyone,, seeing as how there are opposite viewpoints expressed
at times? However, we can safely say that it would not upset us in the least
if any of. those viewpoints turned out to be the truth. Nor would it
surprise us. In fact, your magazine makes more sense and comes closer to
the truth as we see it than any other we have ever read, [Thank you for
the compliment! We are trying hard!]
j We are now in the process of reading WHICH WAY, WESTERN MAN?,
by William Gayley Simpson and are enjoying it very much. Again, some of
• what he says we find hard to swallow, but cannot condemn him or say
that he is wrong in these areas. Who knows? And much of it just “hits the
spot,” so to speak.
Thanks again for the good words and the keen insight you display.
For Truth and Liberty ,
Mr & Mrs. E.A,S..,Ma.
>4* <4* 4*
/y» rp T*
Dear Sir: 12 Match 8.1
Please send a complete list of all your publications. I have been very
impressed with materials I encountered through second-hand sources and
which originated from your establishment.
Best regards
J.B., Virginia
‘■if 4* <1. 4 *
•p rp
My dear George: 11 March 8.1
Your publication of “The Whiteman’s Guide Book” (Liberty Bell,
January 1981) was a great shock to me! Tragic that, evidently, you and
the author have not known the strength of spiritual awareness which has
been one of the greatest assets of the American people, as it was of their
forebears [Yes, this “spiritual awareness of the American people” is
exactly what caused the slaughter of their boys on foreign battle fields
during WW I and WW II, never mind the slaughter of millions of other
White Men on the other side of the battle lines! The creasy Yids were only
the instigators — the "spiritually aware American people” were the tools!]
Have you never really comprehended Washington’s faith as his “tower of
strength? [The White Man’s faith lies in his respect for the eternal laws of
June 1981 55
K*
" t
nature — not in a “tower of strength” built on the sandy foundation of
Oriental myths!]
Reconsider the history of this nation in its days of moral strength and
the former Christian nature of its government [Come now! Wasn’t it the
majority of 'Christian 5 congressmen and senators, imbued with the
“Christian nature of its government”, who were willing tools of the Yids in
their efforts to manipulate America into two fraticidal world wars?] , as
well as the moral courage of the Pilgrims and other pioneers who made this
country truly great. Decadence has come only since the leaders have been
devoted to power and position rather than to conscience (the “knowing”
of the spirit). :
Tragic that your otherwise noteworthy messages should include such a
misleading article. May your eyes be opened to the truth of the Creator of
all that will endure, and to an appreciation of His “well-beloved 5 ’ Son.
Most sincerely,
In His Name,
Mrs B.D.H., California
Dear Landsmann: 15 March 81
Thank you very much for the Liberty Bell and the catalog. I like many
of your cassettes and will order some in the future.
George, you are doing the right thing because the Christian Identity
people are nothing but ignorant, illiterate riff-raff.
I have recommended to Cmdr. Koehl, Thies Christophersen and
Manfred Roeder to shove these people aside. For two reasons I cannot
believe in that stuff: first for racial reasons and, secondly, for linguistic
reasons. The racial reason: We are not, and never were, related to the
Semites (the Jews), the Arabs, the Abyssinians. What is contained in the
Bible is nothing but an odd assortment of lies, partial truths and historical
inconsistencies, and relates more or less to the Jews’ problems. The
linguistic reason: Our language belongs to the Aryan branch and is more or
less related to i.e., Sanskrit, Hindustani, Urdu and Farsi than to Hebrew.
Ludendorff was correct in stating that the old Hebrew had no written
vowels, and no one could therefore be sure how a word had to be
translated. The Bible has then been translated several times, thereby
becoming fuzzier and fuzzier. These Identity people base their contentions
on Bible passages that can be explained in different ways.
I hope you and yours are well.
Best regards,
■ A.W., Ohio
* * * * *
Mr Dietz: 16 March 81
Enclosed is check to cover the cost of “The White Man’s Bible”.
Did you know that the mouthy preacher John Warner of C.D.L. Report
accuses you of stealing his rights? Of publishing books that he claims to
have travelled to Europe to obtain? I welcome the expiration of my
subscription to C.D.L. Report, published by a coward, Babs Minhinette,
56 The Lib erty Bell
• *.
$
m.
V . v
•V
Vi
his former secretary, can inform you all about Warner.
He claims you are a thief real estate broker and publisher of stolen
manuscripts, tucked back in the hills of West Virginia [Just consider the
source!] . He and his so-called Christian church might bear watching.
Best regards,
C.H., Missouri
^ 4; sfc 4s
Dear George; 16 March 81
Thank you so much for your long letter and for the insured parcel
which I got safely. I think the previous parcel by ship must have got lost or
stolen. But even if you send something by surface mail, please always
register it, as English literature here is read easily. Thanks also for the
beautiful photographs of our Leader. I keep them safely and will give some
to my friends. Thank you for telling me so much about yourself. When I
read your letter, I feel as if I am with you, I also received the Liberty Bell
for January, February, March and April.
Yes, the poor Michael Caignet [one of the leaders of the French
Nationalist organisation F.A.N.E. which was outlawed by the French
government last year, who had acid thrown in his face during an attack by
Jewish hoodlums] had so much to suffer. I wrote him a nice letter and
also sent him some money as he does not have any [Letters and donations
may be addressed to: Michael Caignet c/o Notre Europe, B.P. 76-75462,
Paris-Cedex 10, France] . I wrote him that certainly one day he’ll be
avenged. Something has to happen one day, because we prefer our
WELTANSCHAUUNG to their dirty money system!
Savitri Devi has just been operated on her left eye a few days ago. Her
right eye cannot see much since the optic nerve is atrophied. She cannot
write or read at present and I write her letters. She is a bit depressed, but
when she learned that a young boy of 26 [Michael Caignet] has become
almost blind due to the acid thrown in his face, she picked up courage.
More young people are on our side and this enrages the other swine.
I read with interest the books received.
With the best greetings and good wishes for you and your family,
V.S., India
* * * sf: sf:
Dear Mr Dietz: 17 March 81
A friend of mine, a Christian-Patriot, showed me some of your booklets
last year and suggested that I might like to subscribe. For some reason I
held back, although I had enjoyed the issue she’d loaned me.
Now, I’m glad that I did not subscribe. I think the hand of God must
have been staying me. Why? Because today that same friend sent me a
photocopy of a letter from Pastor Sheldon Emry to you, with no
comment of her own. None was needed.
The forces of evil are nibbling away at the less staunch, and the not
truly dedicated “Christians” and one by one you, who seemed to be
leaders of Right, are shown to have feet of clay. Unwilling or unable to
defend the Book which was instrumental in creating this nation you imply
June 1981 57
that you defend. Shame on you!
Have you ever marveled at a book, some of which was written over
2,000 years ago, which accurately tells of our present day dope problem
(pharmaaopea), spiritism (necromancy,), or of men or women performing
sexually to their own sex (an abomination)? These phenomena, although
known in previous ages [and demonstratively practised in Old Testament
days!] , never existed in the epidemic proportions that they do now, and
thereby warranted the comments by. early prophets of today’s (latter
day’s) problems.
One by one the [self-fulfilling] prophecies have been fulfilled. A very
few are left for us to await their terrible , yet wondrous, occurrances.
Wondrous, because in their coming to pass, we reach the long-awaited end
of this system of Satan’s. And, sad to say, you have been victimized by
one of his henchmen.
I hope you wake up before it is too late, and set the record straight
with your readership— that you were mesmerized by an intellectual
adversary who used his lying logic to sway you as a carnie midway spieler
might have. Mr. Perier sounds as if he is a French Zionist. I do not know
of him but I’ll remember him now, as the purveyor of fizz water instead of
the substance of truth.
If you have realized your error and will correct the wrongs you did to
your subscribers, I would like to know, and would then be glad to
subscribe to Liberty Bell. I will be interested to hear your comments on
this. [No comment necessary! Just bring on the tar-barrel and the
feathers!]
Sincerely,
Mrs A.R.M., Arkansas
^
Dear George: 19 March 81
Skeptics like Ben Klassen have every right to call Christianity suicidal. I
wish Christians would take a look at Luke 20:35. “But those who are
worthy of the other world and the resurrection from the dead, neither
take women in marriage nor are women given in marriage to them.” Men
who do marry are merely “sons of the earth” (see previous verse) and
cannot go to heaven. Why? Because you have to be resurrected in order to
go to heaven. This is why the Catholic Church forbids the clergy to marry.
I quoted Jesus Christ, not St. Paul.
As for who will go to hell in the Final Judgment, check Matthew 25:3 3.
It says: “And he will set the sheep at his right, and the goats at his left.”
Jesus came to be the shepherd of the lost tribe of the House of Israel.
These are the only people his disciples were supposed to go and convert.
So these are the only Hebrews who are going to be considered real
Christians; these are the sheep. The lamb and sheep were Israelite symbols.
So who are the goats? The goat is an independent, resourceful animal with
a lot more brains than a sheep, and capable of defending itself. Was the
goat symbolic of any people in the ancient world? Yes, the goat was the
rebus of the Goths. Seen from the side, a goat looks like it has one horn,
58 The Liberty Bell
and this animal is the origin of the unicorn myth. What this all boils down
to is that certain Jews are saved and Germans are damned, except those
Germans who have made themselves into celibate Jews, a contradiction in
itself, since Jews are the most libidinous people on earth.
2nd Esdras (an apocryphal writing,) claims the Lost Ten Tribes, (only
one of three branches that is,) got as far west as Roumania. Now it would
be all right if Identity Christians claimed that eastern and southern
Europeans had people among them with Hebrew blood. Also, other
Levantines, even Canaanites, reached Greece and Italy as slaves. But that’s
as far as it goes. It is preposterous to claim that Vikings, Saxons, Franks,
and the rest of the Nordic tribes were descended from Abraham. The
Assyrian dispersion of the House of Israel was not complete until 700
B.C., and there were White Europeans living in Europe long before then.
They were uncircumcised, too.
We should appreciate the efforts of Identity Christians in making white
people more racially conscious. Race must be at the core of any religion
the white man has in the future, or he is doomed. To claim that only
Christianity can make white people moral is absurd and contrary to
common sense. We can and will make a better religion, and one which does
not demand that you put a lock on your mind and throw away the key.
Christianity is for the stupid, the lazy, the uneducated, and the weak, of
which there are plenty of people in this world. Maybe the Christian
Church can make “better people” out of them; it is certainly determined
to proliferate society with the teeming masses and wretched refuse. No
birth control, no euthanasia, and be sure and make everybody support all
the cripples and genetic defects and allow them to reproduce.
Best regards
J.P., Colorado
Dear George: 18 March 81
Thanks for the literature. Please send ten copies (your choice)of the
Liberty Bell. . .
I have been affiliated with various White Racist Groups but have grown
tired of their attacks upon one another. We have no time for such
things. . . I find it refreshing that you do not usually insult any but the real
enemies. Congratulations on your extraordinary work.
T.T., North Carolina
* * * * *
Dear Mr Dietz: 2 1 March 8 1
If “The Great Liberty Bell Debate” would not be so serious, it would
be amusing. I cannot refrain from giving rry comments:
To M.T., N.Y.: [April L.B.] I would also like to see the oh-so-Christians
of America repent for their sins of crime they have committed against the
German people, . i.e., for their participation in “hate Germany”
classes, for .their support of the unconditional surrender policy against
Germany, for their rape of German women, their delivery of German
prisoners of war into the hands of the Russians for shipment to Siberia,
June 1981 . 59
Siberia, and on and on, all of it in the name of Christ.
To M.B., California: You write Hitler was a Christian. Sure, he was
baptised and believed what he was taught when he was young — as 1 did!
Christianity has many levels, as has humanism, socialism, Judaism. But
many change their belief systems, especially now that we enter the Age.
of Aquarius. I, too, still believe in God (not Jahweh), as my Aryan
ancestors did thousands of years before the God of Abraham was invented.
I also still believe in Christ who drove the money changers out of the
temple and was crucified for this courageous act. But I don’t think he is
going to “save” me.
To J.S,, N.J.: Best letter.
To W.J.C., Georgia; Something similar happened to me some years ago
when I had to realize that my famous preacher was not very “loving.”
To H.C., North Carolina: Nobody says you should publicly come out
against Christianity, but we should have a discussion. Christianity is not
outdated, but the Age of Pisces is over. It was never a Bronce Age religion
— that was the Age of Taurus, 4000-2000 B.C. Christianity is not the last
Dinosaur, but a tradition we have to cope with intelligently and with
understanding, or, in your words, .with respect and dignity.
To James Combs: Again, yes, I think Hitler was an excellent Christian,
whatever that means. But his movement is known for a
WELTANSCHAUUNG, a word which cannot really be translated. There
was lots of room for good Christians in it. Well, many priests and
evangelicals didn’t like it (Bonhoeffer, Faulhaber, etc.), so they later
became traitors to their country. Oh, these good Christians.— I too belong
to the “Golden Age” generation and came over here 20 years ago. Your
insights are naive. Do you really know what it meant to “stick it out in
those years after the war in Germany?” I would have loved to get an
academic degree in those years, but since you had bombed us to death,
this was impossible. But congratulations on your degree. You are right, it
is sad that patriots are divided and I agree, we should unite. But are YOU
ready?
An Aryan sister, Va.
*****
Dear George: 22 March 81
I’ve enclosed a check for $20 for the book “The White Man’s Bible”,
with a little left over.
Some years ago I had Ben at my home when I was somewhat active
with Matt Koehl His last book was quite excellent and he writes quite
well.
My wife and I found the March issue of The Liberty Bell most
interesting. If you remember, my wife was one of those mean old Nazis
and it seems she hasn’t changed much.
Regards to you and your family.
Heil Hitler!
O.M., Florida
FOR MY LEGIONARIES^V.em. 8 :. ":
Romania, commonly known as the
Iron Guard, — perhaps the oldest
anti-communist movement in the
world, still alive — was founded by
Corneliu Z. Codreanu in 1927. FOR
MY LEGIONARIES (353 pp., pb.
$8.00), Codreanu’s stirring work is a
coinplete and authoritative account of
the ideals and principles of the
Legionary Movement which shape.d
the character of young Romanians
before WWII. Control over the
communications media and the normal
channels of book distribution by our
international enemies makes it
impossible to reach the broad market
this unique book deserves. We are
certain that the rapidly deteriorating
political conditions will preclude . a
second edition, and FOR MY
LEGIONARIES will soon become a
collector’s item. This book also
provides the ‘missing pieces’ of the drastically censored THE SUICIDE
OF EUROPE by Prince D. Sturdza; the idendity of those who
masterminded Romania’s takeover and who are now engaged in
carrying out the same program in the U.S. will no longer be unknown
to you (“Solzhenitsyn would appear to have not the slightest inkling of
who conquered HIS country!”— B.C.)
by D. Bacu (307 pp., hb.
$7.00), describes what was
-done to the young men whom Codreanu inspired, when, seven years
after his brutal murder, Romania was delivered to the Bolsheviks. They
were subjected to what is the most fully documented Pavlovian
‘experiment’ on a large number of human beings. It is likely that the
same techniques were used on many American prisoners in Korea and
Vietnam. THE ANTI-HUMANS is a well written document of great
historical and psychological importance. Reading it will be an
emotional , experience you will not forget (“a sequel to Orwell’s
1984”— R.SJL; “a searing expose of red bestiality!” —Dr. A.J.App).
No Anti-Communist library should be without these two companion books!
Order your copies from L.B. Publications, Box 21 , Reedy, W.Va. 25270. today l
S<d±£: 4j-
THE ANTI-HUMANS
THE TALMUD
containing the MIDRASHI.M, the CABBALA, the
RABBIN ICALANA, PROVERBIAL SAYINGS and
TRADITIONS. 395 pages, softcover, $20.00. Order
f rom : LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS, Box 21,
Reedy, W.Va. 25270 USA
60
The Liberty Bell