www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Key Findings:: Interested Parties, 2021

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

To: Interested Parties

From: Global Strategy Group, Hart Research & LD Insights on behalf of FWD.us and America’s Voice
Date: March 9th, 2021
Re: NEW SURVEY- Voters nationwide support citizenship proposals facing Congress

Three leading Democratic polling firms (Global Strategy Group, Garin-Hart-Yang, and LD Insights) recently
partnered with FWD.us and America’s Voice to conduct research around proposed legislation to provide a
pathway to citizenship for certain groups of undocumented immigrants. What we found is an electorate
hungry for action on immigration and very high levels of support for the major citizenship proposals facing
Congress.

After three consecutive election cycles of failed Republican anti-immigrant attacks – the MS-13 hits against
the Democrat in the Virginia Governor’s race in 2017, the caravan attack against Democrats in the 2018
midterm, and the attacks against Biden for supporting “amnesty” in 2020 – the electorate is poised to reward
lawmakers who support reasonable solutions to fix our nation’s immigration laws, starting with a pathway
to citizenship. What follows is key findings from an online survey conducted in late February among 1,200
voters nationwide and an oversample of 350 Latino voters who participated in the 2020 presidential election.

Key Findings:
Citizenship for the undocumented is a consensus issue – not a divisive one – as the major
citizenship proposals facing Congress are all very popular, with substantial support across partisan
lines. Voters far prefer the approach of providing a pathway to citizenship to undocumented immigrants
over an approach of deporting them (by a 79% to 21% margin). Even base Republicans prefer citizenship
over deportation by a 61% to 39% margin.
• Specific proposals to provide citizenship all earn similarly massive support, including with
Democrats, swing voters, Latinos, and African Americans. Notably, substantial numbers of
Republicans also support each proposal as seen in the table below.
• Voters also strongly prefer extending work permits for people in the Temporary Protected Status
(TPS) program over subjecting them to deportation (by a 67% to 15% margin).

Base Swing Base African


Proposal National Democrats Voters Republicans Latino American

DREAM Act 72 / 19 91 / 4 72 / 16 50 / 39 85 / 12 77 / 7
Support Oppose

Citizenship for
undocumented 71 / 22 92 / 4 73 / 20 46 / 44 85 / 12 79 / 10
farmworkers Support Oppose

Citizenship for
undocumented 66 / 25 89 / 5 71 / 18 39 / 50 83 / 14 84 / 5
essential workers Support Oppose

Voters want action on immigration to fix what they see as a broken system in need of major reform.
The risk of inaction is high, especially with the Democratic Base and Latino voters. Blame for
inaction will be shared across partisan lines. Three-quarters of voters (75%) believe the country’s
current immigration system is not working well, a view that is shared equally by base Democrats (71%),
swing voters (76%), and base Republicans (79%). Given this finding, voter reaction to inaction on
immigration should be considered:
• Voters will be upset over inaction, especially the voters Democrats need to show up in the
midterm elections. Nearly two-thirds (63%) of voters say they would be upset if immigration
reform does not pass and undocumented immigrants remain vulnerable to deportation, while just
37% say they would be happy with that outcome. Notably, 75% of Latinos say they would be upset,
including 38% who say they would be very upset by this outcome. The Democratic base would also
be upset over inaction (86% upset; 42% very upset).
• Republicans will not receive all or even most of the blame should the efforts to pass
citizenship bills fail. When asked who they would blame if immigration reform does NOT pass,
38% say Republicans, 22% say Biden and the Democrats, but the plurality say both parties equally.
This means that three in five voters (62%) would blame Biden and the Democrats in some capacity
if these efforts fail. And while swing voters are especially likely to blame both sides (54% would
blame both sides, 18% would blame Biden and Democrats, 27% would blame Republicans), over
a third of base Democrats (38%) would place at least some blame on Democrats for that outcome.
• A majority of voters say they would be less likely to vote for a Senator who votes AGAINST
citizenship bills. A majority of all voters (55%), and a strong majority of Latinos (65%) say they
would be less likely to vote for a Senator who votes against citizenship bills, while just 25% of voters
say they would be more likely to vote for a Senator who does that. Only 17% of voters say this
issue would not make a difference in their vote.

As you communicate on citizenship proposals, our advice is to highlight the individuals impacted
and tell their stories about who would benefit. In addition, we recommend continuing to invoke the
“keeping families together” framework that has worked well as an umbrella theme for Democrats on
immigration in recent years. Key strategic findings include:

• Amplify the stories and situations of those affected. Support is massive for providing citizenship
for many different groups, but some of the more sympathetic groups include healthcare workers,
farm and ranch workers, and school employees and teachers. Within the essential worker groups,
after health care workers, the top groups include PPE factory workers and sanitation workers.

• Reminding voters of the criteria for citizenship also boosts support and adds to the public’s
comfort with granting citizenship. Some of the more popular criteria for citizenship inclusion are
being regularly employed and paying taxes, having a spouse or child who has served in the military,
living in America for many years, and being in danger upon a return to their home country.
▪ While voters across partisan lines find the idea of employment and paying taxes to be
important, there is additional nuance to these findings by partisanship, with Democrats tending
to be more sympathetic to what might happen to immigrants (that they would be in danger as
they came here seeking freedom from oppression) while Republicans tend to be more
sympathetic to the idea of immigrants’ contributions in the U.S. (being employed, having family
serving in military, being independent and not reliant on government).

• Adapting family separation messaging to the debate over citizenship is our most resonant
message. Voters strongly support Biden’s action to end family separation policy at the border, and
in testing a variety of messages in support of citizenship, the item below tests best:
“It is cruel and wrong to deport people who have family roots in the United States, and work, pay
taxes, and contribute to our communities. We must stop separating families and allow hardworking
immigrants to gain legal status and a pathway to citizenship so that we keep families together.”

• In general, it is better to focus on all of the aforementioned sympathetic details of those


affected than to make economic arguments, including arguments about wages or demand
for labor. As we have seen in the past, talking about immigrants doing jobs Americans won’t do
is not a helpful frame, and other economic arguments are less effective than what is recommended
above.

ABOUT THIS SURVEY


Global Strategy Group, Garin-Hart-Yang, and LD Insights conducted an online survey of 1,200 nationwide voters and an oversample
of 350 Latino voters who participated in the 2020 election between February 20-26, 2021. The survey had a confidence internal of
+/- 2.8%. All interviews were conducted via web-based panel. Care has been taken to ensure the geographic and demographic
divisions of the population of the electorate are properly represented. For the target definitions described in this memo, Base
Democrats are defined as Biden voters who always/mostly vote for Democrats, Base Republicans as Trump voters who always/mostly
vote for Republicans, and Swing Voters as the remaining voters in the middle of the electorate who do not fall into either group.

You might also like