www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy: evidence and techniques

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):424-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Mar 17.

Abstract

Laparoscopic subtotal/supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) is a surgical option when hysterectomy is indicated. Proponents of LSH suggest possible advantages including reduced recovery time, decreased risk of pelvic organ prolapse, and decreased risk of organ damage, in particular to the urinary tract. Opponents of LSH have suggested that the future risk of cervical malignancy, the possibility of ongoing cyclical bleeding, limited morbidity due to total laparoscopic hysterectomy, and similar clinical outcomes render this approach unnecessary. One study compared LSH with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a randomized controlled trial that reported psychologic and sexual outcomes; however, no clinical data were published. The present review outlines techniques for subtotal hysterectomy and critically appraises the available evidence for outcomes including operative data, short- and long-term complications, and functional outcomes.

Keywords: Complications of hysterectomy; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy; Supracervical hysterectomy.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hysterectomy / adverse effects
  • Hysterectomy / methods*
  • Hysterectomy, Vaginal / adverse effects
  • Hysterectomy, Vaginal / methods
  • Laparoscopy / adverse effects
  • Laparoscopy / methods*
  • Length of Stay
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology*
  • Treatment Outcome