It is stated who is the most appropriate inventor or patent owner of inventions interacted by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Based on the opinion of the government, the process of inventions and which entity (human or AI) plays the role in each process are analyzed. The result of this study shows that assuming AI do not have intention itself, inventions interacted by AI would be recognized as ones human use the AI as “tools”, and the human could obtain the inventorship followed by the current patent law. And it concludes that patent ownership rights could vest in the entity which do “advance learning” to AI, give the AI demands of human and play reduction to practice (discover the conception of the inventions).

The enterprise's interest to the legal protection of IoT Data that will bring a profitable value is higher. On the other hand the current Intellectual Property Laws are designed to protect invented products and works the Author creates and are not designed to protect “data” without conditions. The contract based on Civil Code makes it possible to limit the licensee's use of “data”. However the best drafting to license “data” is not clear so far. This paper analyzes the coverage of the protection by the current Intellectual Property Laws and its bound. An idea of law to protect “data” as “information assets” based on the analysis is given.