www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

Announcement: Goodreads to Import WorldCat & Library of Congress Data Tonight

Comments Showing 1-46 of 46 (46 new)    post a comment »
dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Patrick (new)

Patrick Brown | 101 comments This post is a heads up that we are going to import a large amount of data tonight from some new sources like WorldCat and Library of Congress. We would love it if you guys could keep an eye out for any issues you see and post them in this thread.

Also, we will be rolling out some new librarian tools in the next few days. I'll post more info about them as I have it.

Thanks!


message 2: by [deleted user] (new)

maybe copyright issues?
hope this endeavor works out for the best! :D


message 3: by mlady_rebecca (new)

mlady_rebecca | 589 comments Thanks for the heads up.


Experiment BL626 | 358 comments Oh dear dear dear. Such massive change, I hope they will make Goodreads better. *cross fingers* *glares at Facebook*


message 5: by Jan (new)

Jan (janoda) | 140 comments Eeeek! Excitement!


message 6: by Peter (new)

Peter (pete_c) | 388 comments Patrick wrote: "This post is a heads up that we are going to import a large amount of data tonight from some new sources like WorldCat and Library of Congress. We would love it if you guys could keep an eye out for any issues you see and post them in this thread. "

I don't know if this is directly related, but I added 7 new editions of current books, all written by John Dickson Carr, and they would not combine.


message 7: by Branimir (new)

Branimir | 3 comments I can't wait to see what the new features are!


message 8: by Violetta (new)

Violetta | 477 comments Peter wrote: "I don't know if this is directly related, but..."

Ditto over here. I didn't add the books, I was returning to an author's page to finish what I'd started yesterday. It didn't work to combine her books either.


message 9: by Bob (new)

Bob | 15 comments Yes, the combine function is down for everyone - see Feedback group.


message 10: by Ryan (new)

Ryan McCloskey-Murray (rynmrry) | 8 comments I can't wait for the new features :D Thanks for the update.


message 11: by Louise (new)

Louise | 17 comments Hey folks, I've started a script to import data from WorldCat. It should mostly touch title, author, and page number fields. If you check the librarian logs, the changes should be done as "Goodreads" as soon here:

http://www.goodreads.com/book/edits/8388


message 12: by Sandra (new)

Sandra | 29549 comments Thanks for the heads up Louise :)


message 13: by Jan (new)

Jan (janoda) | 140 comments Louise, I took a look, and does this mean that we'll have to update all titles to capitalize them again?


message 14: by Louise (new)

Louise | 17 comments Hm the titles do look a little strange. I'll run a clean up script on those, so no need to change them for now. Thanks for the heads up, Jan.


message 15: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45178 comments Mod
Louise, WorldCat importing also seems to not show up as the book's source on the edit page, and it's not updating/correcting the publisher name.


message 16: by Bob (new)

Bob | 15 comments I hate to reveal ignorance, but can someone explain what this is all about? Is there some new librarian capability that didn't exist before, and how does one access it?


message 17: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45178 comments Mod
Bob wrote: "Is there some new librarian capability that didn't exist before"

Not yet.


message 18: by Peter (new)

Peter (pete_c) | 388 comments Patrick wrote: "This post is a heads up that we are going to import a large amount of data tonight from some new sources like WorldCat and Library of Congress. We would love it if you guys could keep an eye out fo..."

I hope this will not overwrite data from users.


message 19: by Trinity (new)

Trinity (snappingturtle) | 4 comments Thank you for the heads up. Exciting times...


message 20: by Michael (new)

Michael | 253 comments Peter wrote: "I hope this will not overwrite data from users."

Yes, I was worried about that, too.


message 21: by Peter (new)

Peter (pete_c) | 388 comments Michael wrote: "Peter wrote: "I hope this will not overwrite data from users."

Yes, I was worried about that, too."


Not an idle worry. I have been discussing just that problem with the data imported from publishers in another thread.


I ♥ Bookie Nookie (bookienookiereviews.blogspot.com) (ibookienookie) | 66 comments oh the suspense is killing me...


message 23: by Jan (last edited Jan 19, 2012 02:40AM) (new)

Jan (janoda) | 140 comments OH GOD.

I don't know if it's for librarians only and thus the changes told about above, or a general change, but I LOVE LOVE LOVE the new sorting options on the editions page.

Edit: I mean look at this beauty: http://www.goodreads.com/work/edition...


message 24: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45178 comments Mod
It's a general change, but I didn't realize everyone could see it yet.


message 25: by Jan (new)

Jan (janoda) | 140 comments I did a happy dance :D

Does this mean that the new librarian stuff still has to roll out?


message 26: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45178 comments Mod
There will be announcements.


message 27: by Peter (new)

Peter (pete_c) | 388 comments rivka wrote: "It's a general change, but I didn't realize everyone could see it yet."

I just saw it last night. Someone did a really good job.

That's worth at least 2 ATTABOYs. (IT in joke.)

Really, though, nice work, people.


message 28: by rivka, Former Moderator (last edited Jan 19, 2012 09:13AM) (new)

rivka | 45178 comments Mod
Thanks. :) I had nothing to do with the programming (for obvious reasons), but I did make a few suggestions. And I agree, it's very cool!

By the way, there are some things on those pages that only librarians can see (like the book source info).


message 29: by Paula (new)

Paula (paulaan) | 7012 comments rivka wrote: "There will be announcements."

:)

Librarian book edits audit page = nice!


message 30: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45178 comments Mod
Paula wrote: "Librarian book edits audit page = nice!"

I'm glad you like it. I'm not sure what you mean, though. ;)


message 31: by Paula (new)

Paula (paulaan) | 7012 comments rivka wrote: "Paula wrote: "Librarian book edits audit page = nice!"

I'm glad you like it. I'm not sure what you mean, though. ;)"


Oops - Librarian change log - proper description

http://www.goodreads.com/book/edits/1...


message 32: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45178 comments Mod
You mean the source table?


message 33: by Paula (new)

Paula (paulaan) | 7012 comments That would be it I am presuming it is new since I don't remember seeing it before - I will have to work on my powers of description :)


message 34: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45178 comments Mod
The source table is indeed brand new. :)


message 35: by Peter (new)

Peter (pete_c) | 388 comments rivka wrote: "The source table is indeed brand new. :)"

Just looked at it. Awesome!


message 36: by MissJessie (new)

MissJessie | 866 comments Query re the source table, very awesome. But

I just modified a record changing the author from Phd William R. Durland, removing the Phd.

Also made a change in grammar in the description.

Now the table shows me as having changed the author (Correct), changing the URL - didn't and there still isn't one; and changing the language to English (didn't).

Not too crazy about being shown as having modified things I have not.

Comments?


message 37: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45178 comments Mod
I've reported those bugs.


message 38: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45178 comments Mod
Out of curiosity, why are you editing authors on the book page, instead of via their author profiles?


message 39: by M (last edited Jan 19, 2012 11:08AM) (new)

M (pandabearchews) | 61 comments Actually, some of the fields like description must change by a certain percentage before we attribute you as the "source" for the field. So minor changes will not affect the source.

I will look into the language & URL concerns. Can you send me the book id?


message 40: by vicki_girl (new)

vicki_girl | 2764 comments Mayanka, can you look at following as well?

http://www.goodreads.com/book/edits/7...

It shows the description as being from B&N, where as in the edits you can see I added it (it was blank before). Actually none of the edits for this book are showing in the source data.


message 41: by M (last edited Jan 19, 2012 02:02PM) (new)

M (pandabearchews) | 61 comments The description might not apply to the edition -- if the checkbox was set to use the default description it applies to the whole work, not just the edition. We will try to make that more clear on the page.

As for the other fields, anything that you edited from a long time ago would not be filled in yet, but we will soon run a script to update them.


message 42: by vicki_girl (new)

vicki_girl | 2764 comments Here's one I just changed from the default description to a new description:

http://www.goodreads.com/book/edits/2...

The source says 'Not set'. Is that the way it's supposed to be?

Also on both my examples (msg 41, and this one), I am also listed as the source for the url, which I did not touch.


message 43: by M (new)

M (pandabearchews) | 61 comments Thanks for the examples. I will look into it and the URL field.


message 44: by MissJessie (new)

MissJessie | 866 comments Mayanka wrote: "Actually, some of the fields like description must change by a certain percentage before we attribute you as the "source" for the field. So minor changes will not affect the source.

I will look i..."


http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12...


message 45: by MissJessie (new)

MissJessie | 866 comments rivka wrote: "Out of curiosity, why are you editing authors on the book page, instead of via their author profiles?"

Because, a) I was looking at the book page in the first place and noted the error.
b) If the author is changed on the author page, as opposed to the book page, it is never re-indexed and so remains hanging in the sort for, in this particular situation, Ph.D. forever.
c) Eventually, I'll get all of them corrected anyway (Ph.D.) (until new ones come along)(perpetual maintenance). At that point,
d) Since there is a script the removes authors without books, eventually the "John Smith Ph.D." will be automatically removed anyway without additional librarian intervention.


message 46: by Robert (new)

Robert Kelly (robertmkelly) | 3 comments RE: the Original Poster and origin topic: Has anyone else noticed that WorldCat is no longer carrying the API from Goodreads Reviews?


back to top

Quantcast