www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

×
Please click here if you are not redirected within a few seconds.
After appropriate notice and hearing, the Commission found that the corporate structure and continued existence of American and Electric unduly and unnecessarily complicated the Bond and Share system and unfairly and inequitably distributed voting power among the security holders of that system, in violation of the ...
To deny that Congress has power to eliminate evils connected with pyramided holding company systems, evils which have been found to be promoted and transmitted ...
In this case, Okin, as a stockholder, attacked the transaction made by his company with its subsidiary on the grounds that it was both illegal and fraudulent.
Petitioners argue that whatever may be the extent of the power to regulate the practices of public utility holding companies, the orders of the Commission now ...
People also ask
- Description: U.S. Reports Volume 329; October Term, 1946; American Power & (and) Light Co. v. Securities & (and) Exchange Commission. Call Number/Physical ...
Case opinion for US Supreme Court AMERICAN POWER & LIGHT CO. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
This case is now before us on respondent's motion to dismiss a petition filed in this court by American Power Light Company under § 24(a) of the Public Utility ...
(d) Congress has power under the commerce clause to impose relevant conditions and requirements on those who use the channels of interstate commerce so that ...
AMERICAN POWER & LIGHT CO. v. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 4, 1945.
American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 325 U.S. 385. This opinion cites 11 opinions. 5 references to Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway ...