https://quantitycinema.com/2022/07/15/on-isiah-medina-films-2010-2020
On "Isiah Medina: Films 2010-2020"
by Frank Ruda, Kurt Walker, Kelley Dong, Sam Bodrojan, Phil
Coldiron, and Steffanie Ling (15 Jul 2022)
Frank Ruda
A Cut in the Night. Isiah Medina’s 88:88 (2015)
“Be void.” (Heather H. Yeung, “NYCTICORAX-NYCTICORAX”)
“Nothing else to see except suspension.” (88:88)
It is difficult to show and to see (a) suspension (of structure). This is not the same
as to say that it is difficult to identify when a structure stops to work, comes to a
halt, disappears, unravels, or molders. Structures stop (working) all the time –
individual bodies for example, break, die. Collective organizations disperse, die
out. Life-branches die away. Structures stopping (to) work is a mode structures
use to work. It is often how they reproduce themselves. The built-in suspension
of structures is part of the structure of structure. Yet, structures can also stop
working and stop structuring their own suspension. Then the suspension of
structure attains a different quality. Suspension (of structure) can always be a
vanishing mediator of the reproduction of structure (carnival, for example). But a
suspension (of structure) can also be unstructured, or a suspension of structure.
For a moment, at least. This is the moment of a breakup (of the structure of
suspension and structure). This is then how temporality emerges. Only by
breaking up structured time, the structure of time, by suspending time,
temporality emerges, appears, becomes visible, and is brought to the fore. We
experienced a new sense of time. Something happened. This is to say, even
though, there is no structure without the suspension of the structure (of
suspending structure), some-time is created, made and marked by a suspension
that cuts differently. Not-everything is then structure(d). But this means, to
modify Lenin on this, that there are suspensions and then there are suspensions.
One never knows in advance which is which – but we can wager. We shall –
Isiah Medina wagers on the potential of suspension, he cuts right into it.
With 88:88 he brings to light and makes visible how a cut (of electricity-supply)
must be – meta-ontologically – understood as a symptom of an in-built
suspension of structure that enforces and reproduces the latter. But he also
manages to show a(ny) reproductive suspension – always and / or nevertheless –
allows for an event – Alain Badiou’s thought is therefore present and pertinent
throughout 88:88. For a surplus of suspension – –
If all capital-movement is and always was about establishing a time-economy, a
wedging time-measurement and regime of valorization, when (its) time-display
disappears and reappears – when appearing time is cut –, there emerges the
impossible possibility of a resetting of time, of a different running of time, for a
different timing. 88:88 operates on the level of this different timing. Its medium
is what cannot but appear – behold we are in the domain of the digital – to be an
impossible cut. 88:88 cuts through this impossibility and works through
impossible cuts. It does not present a series of images, but moves, if it moves at
all, through cuts, its cuts together. It shows us nothing except cuts – – –
If capital is, in Marx’s description, a movement of value that in sustains itself by
valorizes itself and thereby creates a surplus (of value), this creation hinges on a
constitutive suspension – we could venture to call it capital’s destitutive or
suspending power: capital’s suspension is one that works in favor of the former’s
reproduction. it moves everything, everything solid is evaporated – behold,
everything solid is not melted, but vaporized, transformed into the polluting
steam of the steam engine – except its own structural need for reproduction and
growth. Everything is revolutionized so that nothing is ever revolutionized. But
in its structure of revolutionizing without revolutionizing – behold it is
prehistory after all, the night in which all revolutions are grey – it must suspend
what is doing infinitely and ad infinitum. It thus deprives revolution of its
substance; it revolutionizes in modus suspensionii (by becoming nonrevolutionizing’s revolution’s “automatic subject” (Marx)). Capital’s structure of
reproductive suspension thereby creates the and organizes the impossibility of
ever being able to change its operation – which it is why it can seem as if it were
(in our) nature. The digital medium almost mimetically – in its form and
immaterial material – redoubles this very impossibility by confronting everyone
with the impossibility of conceiving of a (digital) cut. To thus suspend the
predominant mode of suspension one has to do the impossible. One has cut
through the predominant modes of suspension, to cut them into two and
thereby cut (what) the (movement of capital does) not (cut) –
Medina / cuts.
In 88:88, he explores the appearance of a suspension of time-measurement – a
suspension that is part of the structure’s reproductive mechanisms – and
transforms this cut(ing of electricity) into something else. He enables one to
conceive of another mode of suspending, one that goes against the smooth
running of time, a cut of and in time which is constitutive of (historical)
time. 88:88 operates with and on the level of the time of the surplus-ofsuspension, on the level of the time of the cut, of the cutting of time, of the time
of cutting time. This is why Medina times differently. He forces us to think what
a cut is by exploring the mode in which a cut happens (to dis-appear in the very
medium it cut into). 88:88 thinks in cuts, cutting all (structures in which we
assume to) cut. Medina cuts into the night of the impossibility of the cut – the
digital – to clarify what it means to follow the potential of the cut in the first, and
last, place). Showing us only the dis-appearance of the being of the happening of
the cut, Medina cuts in novel ways – –
Thinking in cuts and making thought-cuts visible – 88:88 is cutting edge –,
Medina allows us see that even a capitalist (depriving) cut (of electricity) whose
restitution is commonly represented as four eights (88:88) is a mode of
suspension that can be cut into two and comes with a potential surplus-ofsuspension. To make this potential visible, Medina performs quarter turns. He
shows us that what seems like a linear sequence of structure and suspension and
suspension as structure is actually a condensation of infinity – behold the 8 is
wrongly represented infinity, behold the 8 is wrongly represented infinity,
behold the 8 is wrongly represented infinity – must actually be flattened. He
thereby indicates a possible fo(u)rtification of infinity – – –
88:88
is
∞∞ . . ∞∞
Jacques Lacan addressed the Möbius strip relationship of consciousness and the
unconscious as that of an inner eight and thereby indicated how suspension and
structure (of consciousness) leads us into the zone of constitutive disorientation.
What if we had to eight-y-fy the (revolutionary subject’s to come) inner eight to
think something other than capitalism?